DOCSLIB.ORG

Rupsiyabagar-Khasiyabara Hydroelectric Power Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rupsiyabagar-Khasiyabara Hydroelectric Power Project CENTREFOR WILDLIFESTUDIES August3,2012 Admln. Ofrice: # {669, 31st Cross, l6th Main, Banashankari 2nd Stage, Dr.P.J. Dilip Kumar, IFS Bengaluru - 560 070, Indla. Chair,Forest Advisory Committee Tel. : +91 80 26715364,Tele Fax : +9'l 80 26715255 DirectorGeneral of Forests WEBSITE : rrvwwwcslndia.org Regd. Oflice: 26-2,Aga Abbas Ali Road (Apt.403) Ministryof Environmentand Forests Bengaluru - 560 042, lndia. ParyavaranBhavan CGOComplex, Lodhi Road NewDelhi-1 10003 Sub:Final Report of thesub-committee of the FACon the Rupsiyabagar Khasiyabarahydroelectric project i n Munsiyari (RKH PP), Uttarakhand. Sir, This reportpertains to the site inspectionthat I had carriedout withAIGF Sri HC Choudhryon April21-22,2012. The site inspection was relatedto the 261 MW Rupsiyabagar-KhasiyabaraHydro-Power Project ("RK HPP" for short)in Pithoragarhdistrict of Uttarakhand,proposed by the NationalThermalPower CorporationLimited (henceforth NTPC). The StateGovernment of Uttarakhand videtheir letter dated 21.12.2009 submitted a proposalto obtainprior approval of CentralGovernment under the Forest(Conservation) Act, 1980 for diversionof 217.522 hectare of forestland for 30 years,in favourof the useragency. The proposalwas examinedby the ForestAdvisory Committee ('FAC", for short)on 25.05.2010and rejected. As you are aware,in responseto a representationfonryarded by the Nodal Officer,Forest (Conservation)Act, 1980 (Government of Uttarakhand)in his letterdated 15.09.2010, requesting the MoEFto re-considerits decision to declineapproval of the CentralGovernment, the ForestAdvisory Committee set- up a sub-committeeto undertakea site inspection. Accordingly,the abovesub-committee of the FAC,headed by me, inspectedthe site identifiedfor constructionof the RK HPP in orderto assessfirst-hand the floraand faunaavailable in and aroundthe forestland proposed for diversion and the ecologicalvalue of the area.The mandatedinspection was carriedon 21stand 22nd April 2012. Given the shortduration of thevisit, our assessment was basedon my experienceand expertiseas a wildlifeecologist and scientist, and Sri Choudhry'sprofessional expertise as a forester.I alsodid a full reviewof existingliterature on the floraand faunaof the areaproduced by reputed scientistsfrom the Wildlife Institute of Indiaand GB PantInstitute of Himalayan Environmentand Development,I have also had informaldiscussions with ecologicalscientists from the WildlifeInstitute of Indiawho haveworked extensivelyin the region.In addition,we soughtopinion from local inhabitants aboutthe biodiversity/wildlifevalues of the areaduring our briefsite visit. The useragency (NTPC) had consistently maintained that the projectsite did not haveany ecological value. Although we couldnot obviously quantify measurementsof theflora and fauna of in andaround project site given the short durationof ourvisit, literature review and discussions with scientists and local inhabitantsshowed the siteto be of highecological/wildlife value. Basedon my experienceas a scientist,my overallassessment is thatthe area has highbiodiversity value and is importantfor habitatconnectivity in the region. Accordingly,I had stronglyagreed with the earlierdecision of the FACto reject the constructionof the damby the useragency at the proposedsite. As the chair of the sub-committeeI had senta draftreport cleady stating this conclusionto AIGFMr. Choudhry and copied to you. However,the originaldraft report sent by me has beensubstantially modified by the AIGF,and I findthat the originalclear-cut recommendation appears to have beenwatered down, and the matteragain pushed back to FACfor reconsideration.I am notin agreementwith such a suggestion,and have re- editedthe report. I firmlysupport the originaldecision of the FACto rejectthe Rupsiyabagar- KhasiyabaraHydro-Power Project on groundsof itsecological impacts. This is my firm and finalview. In casethere is stilla disagreementto thisopinion, on the partof the committee memberAIGF Sri. Choudhry, I kindly request him to add hisofficial dissent note to the end of this report,but without further editing the bodyof the textand conclusionsin thisfinal report signed by me. However,any original submissions or documentssubmitted to FAC in this regardmay pleasebe appendedas required. I thankMr. Choudhry, the ProjectProponents, all membersof the FACand yourselffor entrustingthis work to me and trustthat this reportwill assistthe FAC and MoEFas expected.Kindly acknowledge the receiptof this letter. Thankingyou, Yourssincerely, K\X/\W-r I K. UllasKaranth, Ph.D., F.A. Sc. Member-FAC& Chairof the Subcommitteeon RKHPP Copyto: All membersof ForestAdvisory Committee INSPECTION REPORT OF THE SUB‐COMMITTEE OF THE FOREST ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO ASSESS WILDLIFE VALUES AND ECOLOGICAL IMPACT OF THE RUPSIYABAGAR‐ KHASIYABARA HYDRO‐ELECTRIC POWER PROJECT (RKHPP) K. Ullas Karanth, Ph.D., F.A.Sc – Member, FAC & Chair of the Subcommittee H. C. Choudhry, IFS, Assistant Inspector General of Forests, MoEF Introduction: The State Government of Uttarakhand vide their letter dated 21.12.2009 submitted a proposal to obtain prior approval of Central Government under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 for diversion of 217.522 hectare of forest land for 30 years, in favour of the National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (henceforth NTPC) to construct the 261 MW Rupsiyabagar‐Khasiyabara Hydro‐Power Project (“RKHPP” for short) in Pithoragarh district of Uttarakhand. The proposal was examined by the Forest Advisory Committee (“FAC”, for short) on 25.05.2010. The FAC after examination of the proposal observed that (i) the forest land proposed to be diverted is a virgin wilderness area and is highly sensitive to erosion; (ii) construction of road proposed as a constituent component of the project will severely accentuate the problem of erosion; (iii) the wildlife management plan prepared for the project does not address the likely impact of the proposed project on many endangered species available in the area; and (iv) the proposed project is one of the seven hydro power projects and is located in the mid‐stretch of the river. The FAC, therefore recommended that the project may be rejected on merit as it is located at the center of a highly ecologically sensitive, wildlife habitat. During the FAC meeting held on 17.06.2010, NTPC placed a request for a re‐evaluation of the RKHPP. The FAC however observed that many of its former observations still held good. After thorough deliberations, the FAC observed that no new fact related to the project has been placed before it, and therefore decided to reiterate its earlier recommendation to reject the proposal on merit. The Nodal Officer, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Government of Uttarakhand in his letter dated 15.09.2010, forwarded a copy of a representation of NTPC requesting the MoEF to re‐consider its decision to decline approval of the Central Government, in accordance with Section‐2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The Nodal Officer highlighted that certain new facts had come to light and the RKHPP needed to be evaluated anew in this light. The important facts summarized by the NTPC in their letter dated 23.05.2011, are as below: (a) Lot of human interface already exists and is increasing due to a road being constructed by the Border Roads Organisation (BRO). 1 (b) Initially, NTPC was planning to construct 18.00 km road between dam and power house of the project. After a joint survey with BRO, the NTPC has decided to follow the alignment of BRO road for 16 km. Requirement for new road has therefore been substantially reduced from 18.00 km to 1.80 km. (c) Similarly, alignment of 12 km long road requiring diversion of 112 hectares of forest land (out of 217.154 hectares of the total forest land required for the project) proposed to be constructed in the power house area has been selected in such a manner that apart from various components of the project, it also provides connectivity to seven villages located therein. Even if the project does not get clearance, the PWD, Uttarakhand will construct the said road (under tribal sub‐ plan) to provide connectivity to these villages. The effective requirement of the forest land for the project is thus 105 hectares only; (d) Tree coverage is less than 70 trees/hectare; (e) As per the National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning maps the project site is located in slight to moderate erosion zone; (f) No rare /endangered species of wildlife are observed in the project area; (g) Project does not lie in Eco Sensitive Zone, Wild Life Sanctuary, Bio Sphere Reserve, National Park and important migratory route of wild animals; (h) Catchment area treatment envisages expenditure of Rs. 34.67 crore out of which Rs. 8.00 crore is proposed for wildlife management; and (i) NTPC is ready to conduct additional studies on wild life management and soil erosion protection measures. The FAC, in a meeting held on 28th ‐ 29th November 2011, examined the revised petition. The representatives of the NTPC also made a presentation during the meeting. The FAC recommended that before making a final decision on the petition submitted by the user agency, a sub‐committee of the FAC will inspect the site identified for construction of the RKHPP in order to have first‐hand assessment of the flora and fauna present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion. The FAC had earlier rejected the proposal on ecological grounds, after carefully considering documentary evidence as well as a presentation made by the project 2 proponents. However, this field
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate-Glacier Relationship in the Monsoon-Arid Transition Zone: a Case Study in Himachal Pradesh, India
    Climate-Glacier relationship in the monsoon-arid transition zone : A Case study in Himachal Pradesh, India Farooq Azam Mohd To cite this version: Farooq Azam Mohd. Climate-Glacier relationship in the monsoon-arid transition zone : A Case study in Himachal Pradesh, India. Earth Sciences. Université de Grenoble, 2014. English. NNT : 2014GRENU032. tel-01230980 HAL Id: tel-01230980 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01230980 Submitted on 19 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THESIS Submitted to obtain the degree of DOCTOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GRENOBLE Speciality : Earth Sciences, Universe and Environment Arrêté ministériel : 1 November 2011 Presented by Mohd Farooq AZAM Thesis directed by Patrick Wagnon and co-directed by Christian Vincent & Ramanathan Alagappan Prepared in the Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Géophysique de l’Environnement/Laboratoire d'Etudes des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement, UJF/CNRS in Doctoral school Earth Sciences, Universe and Environment Climate-Glacier relationship in the monsoon-arid transition zone: A Case study in Himachal Pradesh, India. Defended publicly : 17 December 2014, Before the jury : Mr. Gerhard KRINNER Research Director, CNRS, LGGE (France), President Mr. Martin HOELZLE Professor, University of Fribourg (Switzerland), Reporter Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Gori River Basin Substate BSAP
    A BIODIVERSITY LOG AND STRATEGY INPUT DOCUMENT FOR THE GORI RIVER BASIN WESTERN HIMALAYA ECOREGION DISTRICT PITHORAGARH, UTTARANCHAL A SUB-STATE PROCESS UNDER THE NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN INDIA BY FOUNDATION FOR ECOLOGICAL SECURITY MUNSIARI, DISTRICT PITHORAGARH, UTTARANCHAL 2003 SUBMITTED TO THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................ 4 The authoring institution. ........................................................................................................... 4 The scope. .................................................................................................................................. 5 A DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA ............................................................................... 9 The landscape............................................................................................................................. 9 The People ............................................................................................................................... 10 THE BIODIVERSITY OF THE GORI RIVER BASIN. ................................................ 15 A brief description of the biodiversity values. ......................................................................... 15 Habitat and community representation in flora. .......................................................................... 15 Species richness and life-form
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Vulnerability in North Western Himalayas
    Climate Vulnerability in North Western Himalayas Mukesh Ray, NeerajDoshi, NishantAlag and R.Sreedhar Environics Trust, 2011 A Contribution to the Ongoing Nation-wide Climate Studies Vulnerability in Various Ecoregions of India, 2011 Indian Network on Ethics and Climate Change (INECC) CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 THE HIMALAYAS - PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES 3.0 VULNERABILITY OF THE NORTH WESTERN HIMALAYAS 4.0 ENVIRONMENTS OF CONCERN 5.0 REDUCING RISKS DUE TO CLIMATE CHANGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Global warming induced climate change has triggered events such as melting glaciers, rising sea levels and changing weather patterns.This in turn has lead to storms, droughts, flash floods, cloudbursts, change in vegetation. Growing body of scientific evidence has established that this phenomenon is directly linked to unprecedented amount of GHG gases released in the atmosphere largely due to burning of fossil fuels since the beginning of industrialization in last century. The situation is likely to worsenas countries with low industrialization including China and India began to pursue the same path of carbon based economic growth. However, the impact of climate change is not distributed evenly across the world. Mountain eco-systems are more sensitive to the habitat and climate change due to the interaction of tectonic, geomorphic, ecological and climate agents. For instance, temperatures are rising more rapidly in the Himalayas than the global average. Over the last decade the average temperature in Nepal has risen 0.6 degrees, compared with an increase in average temperatures globally of 0.7 degrees over the last hundred years (Gravgaard, 2010). In another Himalayan region, Tibetan Plateau, temperatures have gone up over three times the global average (Schell, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Glaciers, Glacial Lakes and the Identification of Potential
    Asia‐Pacific Network for Global Change Research Inventory of Glaciers, Glacial Lakes and the Identification of Potential Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs) Affected by Global Warming in the Mountains of India, Pakistan and China/Tibet Autonomous Region Final report for APN project 2004-03-CMY-Campbell J. Gabriel Campbell (Ph.D.), Director General International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development G. P. O. Box 3226, Kathmandu, Nepal, [email protected] The following collaborators worked on this project: Prof. Xin Li (Ph. D.), Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, (CAREERI), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, P. R. China, [email protected] Mr. Gong Tongliang, Bureau of Hydrology Tibet Autonomous Region, Lhasa, P. R. China, [email protected] Dr. Tej Partap. CSK Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India, [email protected] Prof. Dr. B. R. Arora, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology (WIHG), Department of Science & Technology, Government of India, Dehra Dun, Uttaranchal, India, [email protected] Dr. Badaruddin Soomro, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC), Islamabad, Pakistan, [email protected] Inventory of Glaciers and Glacial Lakes and the Identification of Potential Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs) Affected by Global Warming in the Mountains of India, Pakistan and China/Tibet Autonomous Region 2004-03-CMY-Campbell Final Report submitted to APN J. Gabriel Campbell (Ph.D.) Director General, International Centre for Integrated Mountain
    [Show full text]
  • India L M S Palni, Director, GBPIHED
    Lead Coordinator - India L M S Palni, Director, GBPIHED Nodal Person(s) – India R S Rawal, Scientist, GBPIHED Wildlife Institute of India (WII) G S Rawat, Scientist Uttarakhand Forest Department (UKFD) Nishant Verma, IFS Manoj Chandran, IFS Investigators GBPIHED Resource Persons K Kumar D S Rawat GBPIHED Ravindra Joshi S Sharma Balwant Rawat S C R Vishvakarma Lalit Giri G C S Negi Arun Jugran I D Bhatt Sandeep Rawat A K Sahani Lavkush Patel K Chandra Sekar Rajesh Joshi WII S Airi Amit Kotia Gajendra Singh Ishwari Rai WII Merwyn Fernandes B S Adhikari Pankaj Kumar G S Bhardwaj Rhea Ganguli S Sathyakumar Rupesh Bharathi Shazia Quasin V K Melkani V P Uniyal Umesh Tiwari CONTRIBUTORS Y P S Pangtey, Kumaun University, Nainital; D K Upreti, NBRI, Lucknow; S D Tiwari, Girls Degree College, Haldwani; Girija Pande, Kumaun University, Nainital; C S Negi & Kumkum Shah, Govt. P G College, Pithoragarh; Ruchi Pant and Ajay Rastogi, ECOSERVE, Majkhali; E Theophillous and Mallika Virdhi, Himprkrthi, Munsyari; G S Satyal, Govt. P G College Haldwani; Anil Bisht, Govt. P G College Narayan Nagar CONTENTS Preface i-ii Acknowledgements iii-iv 1. Task and the Approach 1-10 1.1 Background 1.2 Feasibility Study 1.3 The Approach 2. Description of Target Landscape 11-32 2.1 Background 2.2 Administrative 2.3 Physiography and Climate 2.4 River and Glaciers 2.5 Major Life zones 2.6 Human settlements 2.7 Connectivity and remoteness 2.8 Major Land Cover / Land use 2.9 Vulnerability 3. Land Use and Land Cover 33-40 3.1 Background 3.2 Land use 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish Ascent of Nanda Devi, East Peak, 1939. S. B
    THE POLISH ASCENT OF NANDA DEVI, EAST PEAK, 1939 31 THE POLISH ASCENT OF NANDA DEVI, EAST PEAK, 1939 BY s. B. BLAKE AND DR. JAKUB BUJAK Polish Himalayan Expedition of which an account is given below was organised by t4e Klub Wysokogorski Polskiego Towarzystwa Tatrzanskiego (K.W.P.T.T.), the Polish Mountaineering Club. This Club had already carried out several successful expeditiol).s to various parts of the world : to the Ramada Cordillera and Aconcagua in I 934, to the High Atlas in the same year, to Spitsbergen in 1934 and 1936, to the Caucasus in 1935, to the Andes again in 1937, to Ruwenzori in 1939, besides collaborating in other Polish scientific expeditions to Greenland in 1937 and to Spitsbergen in 1938. The account was written first by Mr. S. B. Blake from his observations on the expedition, and Dr. Jakub Bujak has very kindly amplified and described first-hand certain parts of Mr. Blake's account. The narrative as here presented has been put together by the Editor of The Himalayan Journal, to whom with the authors we are greatly indebted for permission to publish this article and the accompanying illustrations and sketch-map . I. The Journey to Nanda Devi East Base Camp. By S. B. Blake. The ice avalanche. which resulted in the death of the leader and one .member of the Polish Himalayan Expedition of 1939, the brutal and tragic fate of Warsaw, the home of all the four Polish members of the expedition, and the probability that the two surviving members \vere unable to reach their homes before the frontiers were closed, have led me to place on record the story of their successful ascent of Nanda Devi East (24,39I ft.) and their attempt on Tirsuli (23,2Io ft.) at the head of the Milam Glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • Writ Petition (PIL) No.123 of 2014
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (PIL) No.123 of 2014 Aali-Bedini-Bagzi Bugyal Sanrakshan Samiti ……. Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents Mr. J.S. Bisht, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Joshi, Standing Counsel, for the State. Dated: August 21, 2018 Coram: Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma , A.C.J. Hon’ble Lok Pal Singh, J. Per: Hon. Rajiv Sharma, A.C.J. 1) This petition, in the nature of public interest litigation, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner- society which was registered on 6.10.2006 under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The registered office of the Society is at Lohajung, Post Mundoli, Tehsil Tharali, District Chamoli. The petition has been filed to conserve and preserve Bugyal (Alpine meadows) situated below the area of Roopkund in District Chamoli. Petitioner has also sought a direction to the Forest Department to remove the permanent structure/construction of fibre huts constructed in Bugyals’ area and also to stop the commercial grazing in the area of Bugyals. The population of 60,000/- comes under the Blocks, namely, Tharali, Dewal and Ghat. The area of Bugyal in these three Blocks covers approximately 4,000 square hectares in the forest area of Badrinath Forest Range. Petitioner has also placed on record the copy of the objects of the Society. 2 2) The Bugyals/ meadows are also considered as high-altitude grasslands or meadows situated in the hills, particularly in Garhwal region of District Chamoli below the peak of ‘Jyouragali’. The word ‘Bugyal’ in Garhwali basically means meadow and pasture land which exists above a certain altitude in the mountains also known as ‘Alpine Meadows’.
    [Show full text]
  • Witnessing Change
    WWF-India WWF-India is one of India’s largest conservation organization. Its mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment, which it addresses through its work in biodiversity conservation and reduction of humanity’s ecological footprint. WWF-India engages multiple stakeholders in an inter-disciplinary approach to address the issues pertaining to mitigation of, and adaptation to, climate change. The focus of the Climate Change and Energy programme is to contextualize climate change in the framework of inclusive development, incorporating the climate resilience built within it. WITNESSING CHANGE: Birla Institute of Technology (BIT), Mesra, Ranchi BIT, Mesra, Ranchi is a "Deemed University" offering programmes and undertaking GLACIERS IN THE INDIAN HIMALAYAS research in diverse fields including Engineering & Technology, Applied Sciences (Environmental Sciences and Glaciology etc.), Remote Sensing, Computer Applications, and Biotechnology. The Jaipur Extension Centre of BIT, Mesra has Remote Sensing Division which has been involved since 2006, in studying and monitoring few Himalayan glaciers to understand the climate change impact on the glacier fluctuations as well on the fresh water reserve in the Himalayas. The contents of this report may be used by any one providing proper acknowledgement to WWF and BIT. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources and from analysis, which the authors believe to be reliable. All opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and are based on the author’s judgment at the time of publishing this report. The authors and any one associated with the report are not liable for any unintended errors or omissions, opinions expressed herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Ecosystem Health in the Indian Himalayan Region
    Dr. Harsh Vardhan, Hon’ble Union Minister of Science and Technology, Earth Sciences, Health and Family Welfare MESSAGE The Indian Himalaya Region (IHR) stretches 2500 km across 12 States. It is home to 52 million people and source of food, water and energy for close to 1.5 billion people. The Himalayan ecosystem consists of natural and geological wealth like glaciers, snow, abundant forest cover and bio-diversity, micro flora and fauna and wild life. However the fragile and diverse Himalayan ecosystem is highly susceptible to natural hazards that arises concern about current and potential climate change impacts which include abnormal floods, droughts and landslides, loss of biodiversity and threats to food security. In recent times the receding glacier on account of climate change has aroused global concern as they are source of major rivers. A slight change in the Himalayan ecosystem can drastically alter millions of lives. In order to understand the complexity of the IHR and unravel the efforts needed to sustain the IHR, a National Mission for Sustaining Himalayan Ecosystem (NMSHE) was launched as one of the 8 national missions under the National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC). NMSHE is the only site specific mission that aims to take appropriate measures for sustaining and safeguarding the IHR. The Climate Change Programme (CCP) of the Department of Science and Technology (DST) is coordinating and implementing NMSHE in collaboration with several central government institutions and the 12 Himalayan States. NMSHE has achieved considerable progress by launching Task Forces, establishing State Climate Change Cells, undertaking capacity building initiatives and building bi-lateral mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Envis Bulletin
    ENVISENVIS BULLETIN BULLETIN HIMALAYANHIMALAYAN ECOLOGYECOLOGY ISSN: 0971-7447 (Print) ISSN:ISSN: 0971-7447 2455-6815 (Print) (Online) Volume 26, 2018 ISSN: 2455-6815 (Online) Volume 27, 2019 Biodiversity Conservation and Management Himalayan Ecology & Environment Impact of Climate Change on Himalayan Ecology ENVIS CENTRE ON HIMALAYAN ECOLOGY G.B.ENVIS Pant NationalCentre on InstituteHimalayan of Ecology Himalayan Environment & Sustainable Development (AnG.B. Autonomous Pant National Institute Institute of of Ministry Himalayan of Environment,Environment Forest and Climate Change, Government of India) Kosi-Katarmal,(An Autonomous1 Almora-263 Institute of 643,Ministry Uttarakhand, of Environment, India Forest and Climate Change, Government of India) ENVIS Centre on Himalayan Ecology Kosi-Katarmal, Almora-263 643, Uttarakhand, India ENVIS Advisory Committee Vol. 26, 2018 Vol.ENVIS 27, 2019Bulletin CHAIRMAN ENVIS Bulletin Prof. ENVISS. S. Bargali Advisory, Kumaon Committee University, Nainital, HIMALAYAN ECOLOGY Uttarakhand, India HIMALAYAN ECOLOGY Copyright © : 2018, GBPNIHESD CHAIRMAN CopyrightKosi-Katarmal, © : 2019, Almora, GBPNIHE Uttarakhand MEMBEProf.RS S. S. Bargali, Kumaon University, Nainital, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand, India Prof. Uttarakhand,Varun Joshi, IndiaGuru Govind Singh Indraprastha University, Dwarka, New Delhi, India ENVIS Coordinator Executive Editor Dr. GMEMBERS.C.S. Negi, CBCM, GBPNIHESD, Dr. G.C.S. Negi Dr. G.C.S. Negi Kosi-Katarmal,Prof. Varun Almora, Joshi, GuruUttarakhand, Govind SinghIndia Indraprastha Mr. RUniversity,anjan Joshi Dwarka,, CLWRM, New GBPNIHESD, Delhi, India ENVISEditor-in-Chief Coordinator Executive Editor Editorial Board Kosi-Katarmal,Dr. G.C.S. Almora, Negi, CSED, Uttarakhand, GBPNIHE, India Kosi-Katarmal, Dr.Dr. G.C.S.R.S. Rawal Negi Dr. G.C.S. Negi Prof. R.S. Tripathi, FNA Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphotectonic Indices of Drainage And
    Aligarh Muslim University Department of Geology December 16, 2016 Dr. S. Farooq Professor CERTIFICATE This is to certify that Mr. Mohd. Nazish Khan has carried out the investigation on Morphotectonic indices of drainage and landscape and their bearing on active tectonics in the Goriganga River Basin, eastern Kumaon Himalaya under my supervision for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. The work is an original contribution to the existing knowledge of the subject. He is allowed to submit the work for award of the Ph.D. degree of the Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. Dr. S. Farooq (Supervisor) Acknowledgement I wish to thank Prof. S. Farooq for creating in me an interest in the lofty Himalaya, and processes of active tectonics that perpetually change the shape of this orogen, and for encouraging, helping and guiding me through the years that I’ve been engaged in the investigation of the active tectonic processes in the eastern Kumaon Himalaya. I would like to extend my appreciation to the Aligarh Muslim University for the academic and technical assistance provided to me for the conduct of my research work. Thanks are due to the Chairman Department of Geology for providing institutional facilities necessary for this work. I am also thankful to the University Grants Commission for financial support in the form of a fellowship for the pursuit of this research work. A research grant NRDMS/11/1669/10/Pr:9 by the Department of Science & Technology, Government of India to my research guide, which helped procure data for this study and facilitated field work is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 9(03), 30-34
    ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 9(03), 30-34 Journal Homepage: - www.journalijar.com Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/12550 DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/12550 RESEARCH ARTICLE SPATIO-TEMPORAL CHANGE IN SNOW COVER AREA USING RS & GIS IN THE GORI GANGA WATERSHED, KUMAUN HIGHER HIMALAYA D.S. Parihar and J.S. Rawat Department of Geography, Kumaun University, S.S.J. Campus, Almora, Uttarakhand (India). …………………………………………………………………………………………………….... Manuscript Info Abstract ……………………. ……………………………………………………………… Manuscript History Present research paper is an attempt to examine the dynamics of snow Received: 05 January 2021 cover by using Normalized Difference Snow Index (NDSI) in Gori Final Accepted: 09 February 2021 Ganga watershed, Kumaun Himalaya, Uttarakhand (India). For the Published: March 2021 study of snow cover of Landsat satellite imageries of three different time periods like Landsat TM of 1990, Landsat TM of 1999 and Key words: NDSI, Snow Cover Dynamics, Kumaun Landsat TM 2016 were used. Geographical distribution of snow cover 2 Himalaya, Remote Sensing and GIS, reveals that in 1990 about 30.97% (678.87 km ), in 1999 about 25.77% Gori Ganga Watershed (564.92 km2) area of the Gori Ganga watershed was under snow cover while in 2016 the snow cover was found only 15.08% (330.44 km2). These data suggest that due to global warming about 348.43 km2 snow cover of Gori Ganga watershed has been converted into non-snow cover area at an average rate 13.40 km2/year during the last 26 years. Copy Right, IJAR, 2021,. All rights reserved. …………………………………………………………………………………………………….... Introduction:- Snow is a key component for energy balance of the earth’s i.e.
    [Show full text]