DOCSLIB.ORG

Georgia by David Aphrasidze

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Georgia by David Aphrasidze Georgia by David Aphrasidze Capital: Tbilisi Population: 4.3 million GNI/capita: US$4,920 Source: The data above was provided by The World Bank, World Bank Indicators 2010. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Electoral Process 4.50 5.00 5.25 5.25 4.75 4.75 4.50 4.75 5.25 5.25 Civil Society 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.75 3.75 Independent Media 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.25 4.25 4.25 Governance* 4.75 5.00 5.50 5.75 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.75 6.00 6.00 Local Democratic Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.00 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.00 4.25 4.50 4.50 5.00 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 4.75 Corruption 5.25 5.50 5.75 6.00 5.75 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Democracy Score 4.33 4.58 4.83 4.83 4.96 4.86 4.68 4.79 4.93 4.93 * Starting with the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects. NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest. The Democracy Score is an average of ratings for the categories tracked in a given year. 212 Nations in Transit 2010 Executive Summary eorgia’s journey toward democracy started in the late 1980s and went through several major hurdles after the country gained independence in 1991. The Gcivil war and ethnic conflicts shaped a Georgian “failed state” in the early 1990s. The ethnic wars in Abkhazia and South Ossetia subsequently grew into the Russian-Georgian conflict that reached its peak in August 2008. The country’s relative stabilization under President Eduard Shevardnadze from the second half of the 1990s was stopped by an emerging corrupt and inefficient hybrid political system. Then, in 2003, Georgia’s population seemed to “awaken” with the Rose Revolution; the new government of President Mikheil Saakashvili launched profound reforms in almost all fields of the public and private sectors. Yet the failure of the government to engage the political opposition led to street rallies during the autumn of 2007, culminating in dispersed demonstrations and closure of oppositional television stations. Followed by the early elections of the president and Parliament, the November 2007 events marked a significant setback for Georgia’s democracy. The August war in 2008 further contributed to the internal political crisis. A new political crisis unfolded in 2009; from April to late June, a handful of opposition parties organized protest rallies, picketing parliamentary buildings, the president’s office, the public broadcaster’s building, and closing main streets in downtown Tbilisi. The opposition demanded the resignation of the president and new national elections. With some exceptions, both the government and the opposition restrained from violence. President Saakashvili reiterated his offer from the previous year to launch a second wave of democratic reforms, creating a state commission to draft a new constitution, setting up a working group to create a new election code, and slating local elections for spring 2010. Furthermore, steps were announced to increase the independence of the media and the judiciary, though by the end of the year it remained unclear to what extent the government would be willing to implement these and other reforms. National Democratic Governance. The year started with protest rallies organized by the opposition that signaled a political crisis in the country. Both the government and the opposition managed to overcome the crisis without excessive use of force, and several meetings took place between the president and representatives of the opposition. Although no remarkable results were achieved, there was a noticeable change in the political discourse. A state commission including the parliamentary minority and nongovernmental groups was created to draft a new constitution, and a working group with even broader political participation developed improvements to the electoral legislation. A mutiny in a battalion of the Georgian army raised questions about the effectiveness of civilian control over the military. A number of Georgia 213 kidnapping cases along the conflict zones kept the situation strained but without major complications. Georgia’s national democratic governance rating remains at 6.00. Electoral Process. There were no elections in 2009, but the legacy of the 2008 polls continued to impact national politics. In response, there were street rallies that aimed to compel early presidential and parliamentary elections. In September, Parliament adopted an amendment to the constitution allowing 10 opposition politicians (out of 12) elected by party lists to re-enter Parliament after they had refused to recognize the legitimacy of the elections in May 2008. By the end of 2009, only one politician had taken the offer. The year did, however, feature significant improvements in the electoral legislation; a working group with broad participation of opposition parties developed several rules, including the nomination of a Central Election Commission head and procedures for filing violations. The amendment was approved by Parliament in December 2009 and is significant for the upcoming local elections in the spring of 2010. While positive developments including achieving a political consensus over the direct election of the Tbilisi mayor and amending the electoral code ahead of upcoming local elections marked positive developments in 2009, their impact will only be seen in the coming year. Georgia’s electoral process rating remains at 5.25. Civil Society. Georgia’s civic sector, which was relatively vibrant prior to the Rose Revolution, now struggles to find its niche. The main challenge is civil society’s limited impact on policy formulation. Authorities are mostly reluctant to accept policy recommendations from nongovernmental organizations, considering them unprofessional and politically biased. Local funding sources are still limited in the country. The newly founded Civic Institutionalization Development Fund of Georgia aims to support civic activities by offering small grants. This is the first attempt by the state to provide funding for the civic sector on a wide scale. Several organizations and grassroots initiatives propagate anti-liberal nationalistic and religious values. Georgia’s civil society rating remains at 3.75. Independent Media. The Georgian media landscape is one of the most developed in the South Caucasus. There are several independent television stations with news programs, dozens of independent newspapers, and a fast-growing number of online broadcasters and news forums. The media legislation is recognized as fully compliant with international standards. In 2009, one representative of the parliamentary minority was included in the Georgian National Communication Commission (NCCG). However, media independence overall is challenged by an insufficient level of professionalism and editorial independence. The lack of information and transparency about those holding shares in television stations and the frequent rotation of ownership leave room for doubt about their independence. In 2009, two major private television stations changed owners. The Board of Trustees of the Georgian Public Broadcaster was substantially reshuffled and a new general director appointed. Georgia’s independent media rating remains at 4.25. 214 Nations in Transit 2010 Local Democratic Governance. Georgia’s legislation outlines three levels of governance—national, regional, and local. Beyond the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Georgia is divided into the Autonomous Republic of Adjara and nine regions governed by presidential appointees. The president also proposes the candidacy of the head of the Adjara government to the local parliament and has the authority to dismiss both Parliament and the prime minister in several cases defined by law. Local governance comprises 64 municipalities and 5 self-governing cities including Tbilisi. In 2009, the Ministry for Regional Development and Infrastructure was established to oversee local self-governance as well as to develop a new local governance strategy. While reform measures are foreseen with the establishment of the new ministry, the actual performance of local self- governance in 2009 did not improve, thus Georgia’s local democratic governance rating remains at 5.50. Judicial Framework and Independence. The Georgian judiciary still struggles to emancipate itself from political pressure. A new ombudsman was elected by Parliament in September 2009 and described the human rights record in the country as “grave.” The Ministry for Corrections and Legal Assistance was created to improve conditions in prisons as well as the penitentiary and probation system in general. The situation in Georgia’s prisons is improving notwithstanding several reported instances of human rights violations. Georgia’s judicial framework and independence rating remains at 4.75. Corruption. The perception and experience of corruption appear to have decreased in Georgia since the Rose Revolution. Georgian citizens are confronted less with low-level corruption on an everyday basis. Yet several experts have questioned the potential existence of top-level corruption that may evade solid evidence. The government established a new council to update the anti-corruption strategy and action plan signed by the president in 2005. In addition, the government continued a liberal economic policy during 2009 and announced a new wave of economic liberalization measures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • N E W S L E T T E R
    Schools of Political Studies ISSUE 1, November 2012 ISSUE 0, October 2012 N E W S L E T T E R ISSUE 1 , November 2012 ISSUE 0, October 2012 Letter from the Director of Policy Planning, Council of HUNDREDS OF SCHOOL PARTICIPANTS AT THE FIRST Europe WORLD FORUM FOR DEMOCRACY Over 500 participants from the Schools of Political Studies converged on Strasbourg to join in the first World Forum I am delighted to preface this first issue of the Schools of Political for Democracy (5-11 October 2012). In addition to Studies’ Newsletter as I am convinced that the Schools are uniquely- attending the different events of the Forum, the placed to help build a Europe based on the core values of the Council participants exchanged views with their peers in regional of Europe. The aim of this quarterly Newsletter is to bring the meetings of Schools and achievements of the Schools to a wider audience thereby reinforcing a met their country’s sustainable and well-informed support network. judges from the European Court of Human Rights. The links between the Council of Europe and the Schools of Political Meanwhile the Secretary General of the Council of Studies create a win – win situation: the Council of Europe has gained Europe held several better access to tomorrow’s leaders and decision-makers and more meetings with the visibility amongst the population at large; whilst the Schools are Directors of the Schools assured their political independence and offer high standards of and hosted the diploma award ceremony. training and capacity-building thanks to the umbrella protection of the Council of Europe ‘label’.
    [Show full text]
  • Javakheti After the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia
    Javakheti after the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia Hedvig Lohm ECMI Working Paper #38 April 2007 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) ECMI Headquarters: Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 Internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #38 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2007 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in April 2007 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4 II. JAVAKHETI IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC TERMS ...........................................................5 1. The Current Socio-Economic Situation .............................................................................6 2. Transformation of Agriculture ...........................................................................................8 3. Socio-Economic Dependency on Russia .......................................................................... 10 III. DIFFERENT ACTORS IN JAVAKHETI ................................................................... 12 1. Tbilisi influence on Javakheti .......................................................................................... 12 2. Role of Armenia and Russia ............................................................................................. 13 3. International
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Nasmyth's Georgia
    PICTURE STORY Peter Nasmyth’s Georgia January 2009 Peter Nasmyth’s Georgia Today's Georgia can only be understood if it is seen in the light of the events of the past two decades. The very difficult transformation the country went through after it declared its independence in 1991, and the conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia which plagued the country since then, still largely shape its present day policies. And nowhere is this better described than in Nasmyth's "Georgia" which is a collection of personal stories of the author and author's friends in Georgia over the years. In his words: I collected stories of people, very specific ones, through which I tell the bigger story of Georgia over time… I never wanted to write about the political forces here, rather the forces that make the politics. This will always give a book a longer life. [Interview with Peter Nasmyth, Tbilisi, October 2008] In the next few pages you will get a guided tour of this excellent book. It is written and it reads like a novel, yet it is full of facts that give a complete account of Georgia's modern day history. The descriptions are so colourful that reading this book is the next best thing to visiting Georgia yourself. What makes the book special is also that the author has updated the book and added new chapters two times after it was first published in 1998. Here we discuss the 2006 edition which covers the modern history of Georgia up to the events of the Rose Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Prisoners in Post- Revolutionary Georgia
    After the rose, the thorns: political prisoners in post- revolutionary Georgia Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the the right to life, liberty and security of person.
    [Show full text]
  • Colour Protest in Post-War Georgia – Chronology of Rose Revolution
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS DANUBIUS Vol. 11, no. 2/2018 Colour Protest in Post-War Georgia – Chronology of Rose Revolution Nino Machurishvili1 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to review political and material deprivation as a basis for social protest during the pre – revolution period in Georgia, within the framework of Relative Deprivation theory. The linkage between relative deprivation and the Gini coefficient, as well type of existing political regime and Soviet past is considered. The originality of this paper is conditioned by the new approach to Colour Revolutions, forgotten concept of Relative Deprivation is revisited and applied to the Rose Revolution in order to explain, why individuals decided to join demonstrations, as previous studies are considered a precondition for comprehending social protest against rigged elections, either the lack of democracy. This research is based on a qualitative research methodology, the basic methodological approach being the method of the case study. Among with in – depth interviews based on projective techniques with respondents grouped according to their attitudes towards Rose Revolution, quantitative data of World Bank and Freedom House coefficients are also reviewed. Empirical analysis of interviews proves the existence of political and material deprivation between social groups for the research period. This research shows the methodological value of Relative Deprivation to explain social movement motivation for the Rose Revolution in Georgia. Keywords: Colour Revolutions; Relative Deprivation; Social Inequality; Hybrid Regime Introduction 1.1. Relative Deprivation and Individual Decision to Protest This paper contributes to better understanding of causes Colour Revolutions in Post – Soviet space. It specifically deals with the case of Rose Revolution – peaceful change of Government in Georgia in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • English, French and Russian, the Media Self-Regulation Guidebook Was Launched at the Eurasia Regional Forum for Media Development Held in Paris on 17–19 April 2008
    Yearbook 2008 Yearbook 10 2008 THE REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA THE REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA www.osce.org/fom THE REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA The Representative on Organization for Security and Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe ISBN 978-92-9234-627-0 Co-operation in Europe Freedom of the Media The views expressed by the contributing authors in this publication are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media. © 2009 The Representative on Freedom of the Media Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Wallnerstrasse 6 A-1010 Vienna, Austria tel +43-1-512 21 45-0 fax +43-1-512 21 45-9 e-mail [email protected] www.osce.org/fom Design & Layout: Phoenix Design Aid, Denmark ISBN 978-92-9234-627-0 Yearbook 10 2008 The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Vienna 2009 contents Contents 11 Preface by Alexander Stubb 15 Foreword by Miklos Haraszti Contributions 19 Greeting on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of ARTICLE 19 Miklos Haraszti 23 The Success Story of the Media Self-Regulation Guidebook Adeline Hulin 29 When confrontation ends and co-operation begins. The media and the government Zoya Kazanzhy Mandate of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media 35 Decision No. 193: Mandate of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media 43 Decision No. 1/07: Extension of the Mandate of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Declarations 47 Joint Declaration by the four Global Rapporteurs on Freedom of
    [Show full text]
  • Objectivity and Autonomy in the Newsroom: a Field Approach
    OBJECTIVITY AND AUTONOMY IN THE NEWSROOM: A FIELD APPROACH A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Jay F. Gabriel May, 2008 © Copyright 2008 by Jay F. Gabriel iii ABSTRACT Objectivity and Autonomy in the Newsroom: A Field Approach Jay F. Gabriel Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, 2008 Doctoral Advisory Committee Chair: Paul Garrett This dissertation provides a better understanding of how journalists attain their personal and occupational identities. In particular, I examine the origins and meanings of journalistic objectivity as well as the professional autonomy that is specific to journalism. Journalists understand objectivity as a worldview, value, ideal, and impossibility. A central question that remains is why the term objectivity has become highly devalued in journalistic discourse in the past 30 years, a puzzling development considered in light of evidence that “objectivity” remains important in American journalism. I use Bourdieu’s notion of field to explore anthropological ways of looking at objectivity, for instance, viewing it as a practice that distinguishes journalists from other professionals as knowledge workers. Applying notions of field to the journalistic field through anthropological methods and perspective permits the linkage of microlevel perspectives to macrolevel social phenomena. The dissertation demonstrates how qualitative research on individuals and newsroom organizations can be connected to the field of journalism in the United States. Additionally, it offers insight into why journalists continue to embrace objectivity, even as they acknowledge its deficiencies as a journalistic goal. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author wishes to thank dissertation chair Paul Garrett, committee members Jayasinhji Jhala and Carolyn Kitch and outside reader Andrew Mendelson for their guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • News Corporation 1 News Corporation
    News Corporation 1 News Corporation News Corporation Type Public [1] [2] [3] [4] Traded as ASX: NWS ASX: NWSLV NASDAQ: NWS NASDAQ: NWSA Industry Media conglomerate [5] [6] Founded Adelaide, Australia (1979) Founder(s) Rupert Murdoch Headquarters 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York City, New York 10036 U.S Area served Worldwide Key people Rupert Murdoch (Chairman & CEO) Chase Carey (President & COO) Products Films, Television, Cable Programming, Satellite Television, Magazines, Newspapers, Books, Sporting Events, Websites [7] Revenue US$ 32.778 billion (2010) [7] Operating income US$ 3.703 billion (2010) [7] Net income US$ 2.539 billion (2010) [7] Total assets US$ 54.384 billion (2010) [7] Total equity US$ 25.113 billion (2010) [8] Employees 51,000 (2010) Subsidiaries List of acquisitions [9] Website www.newscorp.com News Corporation 2 News Corporation (NASDAQ: NWS [3], NASDAQ: NWSA [4], ASX: NWS [1], ASX: NWSLV [2]), often abbreviated to News Corp., is the world's third-largest media conglomerate (behind The Walt Disney Company and Time Warner) as of 2008, and the world's third largest in entertainment as of 2009.[10] [11] [12] [13] The company's Chairman & Chief Executive Officer is Rupert Murdoch. News Corporation is a publicly traded company listed on the NASDAQ, with secondary listings on the Australian Securities Exchange. Formerly incorporated in South Australia, the company was re-incorporated under Delaware General Corporation Law after a majority of shareholders approved the move on November 12, 2004. At present, News Corporation is headquartered at 1211 Avenue of the Americas (Sixth Ave.), in New York City, in the newer 1960s-1970s corridor of the Rockefeller Center complex.
    [Show full text]
  • C R E E E S the Spring Semester Has Quickly Filled with Activities and and Slavic Events
    T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f T e x a s a t Au s t i n Center forR ussian East European E& urasian Studies Separatist Confl icts Challenge New Georgian President by Julie George NEWSMarch/ April 2005 When Mikheil Saakashvili became president of Georgia after Vol. 20 No.2 the Rose Revolution of 2003, one of his fi rst promises was to restore the territory of Georgia, reclaiming the separatist territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Current UN recognition understands both Abkhazia and South Ossetia as Georgian territory, but both operate independently Separatist Conflicts Challenge of Georgian law and influence. Of the many bold promises by the New Georgian President 1-2 young leader, the assurance of territorial unity is his most ambitious. The politics CREEES Calendar 3 of Soviet dissolution created opportunities Georgia: History, Legends, for separatism in the Myths and Stories 4-6 successor states. In Georgia, several From the Library 6 factors helped spur the secessionist Explore UT Schedule 7 movements by Abkhazia and South Outreach News 8 Ossetia. First, the i n d e p e n d e n c e CREEES News 9 movements of the Union Republics CREEES Travel 10 (such as Georgia) created a precedent Area Opportunities 11 for the Soviet ethnic autonomies to make similar claims for Map used with permission, GlobalSecurity.orgGlobalSecurity.org independence and http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/georgia.htm sovereignty, as they did in Chechnya, and Nagorno-Karabakh. Second, the The CREEES Newsletter is pub lished regularly during the academic year using politics of nationalism that helped drive Union Republic independence affected no state funds.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Session document 26.11.2007 B6-0492/2007 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure by Jan Marinus Wiersma, Hannes Swoboda and Alexandra Dobolyi on behalf of the PSE Group on the situation in Georgia RE\696717EN.doc PE398.148v01-00 EN EN B6-0492/2007 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Georgia The European Parliament, – having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Georgia, which entered into force on 1 July 1999, – having regard to the inclusion of Georgia in the EU’s European Neighbourhood Policy and the endorsement of the Action Plan by the EU-Georgia Cooperation Council on 14 November 2006, – having regard to its previous resolutions on relations with the region, in particular its resolutions of February 2004 on EU policy towards the countries of the South Caucasus and of October 2006 on relations with Georgia, – having regard to its report on the European Neighbourhood Policy adopted in November 2007, – having regard to the recommendations adopted by the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee on 25-26 June 2007, – having regard to the declaration of 8 November 2007 by the Presidency on behalf of the European Union on the current situation in Georgia, – having regard to the conclusions of the eighth meeting of the EU-Georgia Cooperation Council held in Luxembourg on 16 October 2007, – having regard to Rule 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas the European Union is strongly committed to further strengthening its relations with Georgia; whereas the European Union therefore gives its full support to the economic and social development of Georgia as well as to the further development of its democratic institutions, full observance of democratic standards and procedures and full respect for the rule of law in the country, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    ADDING INSULT TO INJURY: EMOTION, FRAMING, AND COGNITIVE LIBERATION IN GEORGIA'S ROSE REVOLUTION By Kelli Hash-Gonzalez Submitted to the Faculty of the School of International Service of American University in Partial Fulfillment of l D \ , . l . I . (..Y \"-A Q \. ~ f', f'\Ct\ 0 /) the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In ath /I . ~ , l,·t~I -~~L.·· .·· . /(... , ... ~··-/, Dr. Charles H. Fairbanks, Jr. ~ ··· ~~x CJW--1~ /Dr:-Miguel Carter J b w OtJDh_ Dean of the School /<; 0fsT Date 2008 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY UBFV\RY C\ 2>\?\ UMI Number: 3340557 Copyright 2008 by Hash-Gonzalez, Kelli All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 3340557 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway PO Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 481 06-1346 ©COPYRIGHT by Kelli Hash-Gonzalez 2008 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This is dedicated to Kate Lomtatidze, Vera Gogokhia, and all hopeful people. ADDING INSULT TO INJURY: EMOTION, FRAMING, AND COGNITIVE LIBERATION IN GEORGIA'S ROSE REVOLUTION BY Kelli Hash-Gonzalez ABSTRACT This dissertation looks at popular mobilization during Georgia's Rose Revolution (November 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Crime and Excessive Punishment: the Prevalence and Causes of Human Rights Abuse in Georgia’S Prisons
    CRIME AND EXCESSIVE PUNISHMENT: THE PREVALENCE AND CAUSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN GEORGIA’S PRISONS Gavin Slade Iago Kachkachishvili Lela Tsiskarishvili Nika Jeiranashvili Nino Gobronidze Advisors: Baroness Vivien Stern, Professor Andrew Coyle CRIME AND EXCESSIVE PUNISHMENT: THE PREVALENCE AND CAUSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE IN GEORGIA’S PRISONS Tbilisi, 2014 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following report was made possible by generous contribution of individual experts and organizations who contributed their time and expertise. Open Society Georgia Foundation would like to extend special thanks to the authors and advisors of this report; contributing experts: Emil Adelkhanov, Giorgi Burjanadze, Mariana Chicu, Tsira Chanturia; and organizations: Article 42 of the Constitution, Georgian Center for Psychosocial and Medical Rehabilitation of Torture Victims (GCRT), Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association, Human Rights Center, Institute of Social Studies and Analysis, International Center for Prison Studies, Penal Reform International, Public Advocacy, and Youth for Justice. The Foundation would like to express gratitude to Public Defender of Georgia, to the Ministry of Corrections of Georgia, and to the Office of the Personal Data Protection Inspector, who enabled the interviewers to conduct prisoners’ survey. The Foundation would also like to thank hundreds of individuals throughout Georgia, who have participated as respondents in the survey. PREFACE In the last decade, the small south Caucasus country of Georgia has been turned into a testing ground for radical criminal justice policies. In 2003-2012, its prison population jumped by 300%, a huge increase that led to Georgia being the fourth biggest incarcerator in the world per capita by 2010. Then, following a change of government, in a three-month period, beginning at the end of 2012 around half of the 24,000- strong prison population were released in an amnesty.
    [Show full text]