The Origins and Development of the Defense Forces of Northern and Southern Rhodesia from 1890 to 1945

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Origins and Development of the Defense Forces of Northern and Southern Rhodesia from 1890 to 1945 Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 11-10-1994 The Origins and Development of the Defense Forces of Northern and Southern Rhodesia from 1890 to 1945 Eugene Peter Jarrett Pomeroy Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Pomeroy, Eugene Peter Jarrett, "The Origins and Development of the Defense Forces of Northern and Southern Rhodesia from 1890 to 1945" (1994). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4774. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.6658 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. THESIS APPROVAL The abstract and thesis of Eugene Peter Jarrett Pomeroy for the Master of Arts in Histo:ry were presented on November 10, 1994, and accepted by the thesis committee and the department. COMMITTEE APPROVALS: J ------- ·f Rep···rtse.·htative of the Office of Graduate Stud es , (} DEPARTMENT APPROVA David A. J 1 son, Chair ------------- Departme of History *******************************************~***************** ACCEPTED FOR PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY BY THE LIBRARY b on~£~L9J2$_ THESIS ABSTRACT An abstract of the thesis of Eugene Peter Jarrett Pomeroy for the Master of Arts in History presented October 14, 1994. Title: The Origins and Development of the Defense Forces of Northern and Southern Rhodesia from 1890 to 1945 This thesis examines Northern and Southern Rhodesia's history through the formation and development of their police and military units from the time Rhodesia was created in 1890 until the end of the Second World War. Southern Rhodesia, founded after a series of short and bloody frontier wars, was a self-governing British colony under a white minority and centered its peace-time security efforts around keeping an eye on potential uprisings from the African majority. White Northern Rhodesians viewed the African majority with similar suspicion although they were never able to exclude Africans from territorial defense. Northern Rhodesia was governed from London and ultimate power did not lie with the settler community. The importance of the Second World War for Southern Rhodesia is that, because of British strategic policies, Rhodesians received perhaps the widest possible military exposure of any allied nation of the War. Because of a lingering hostility and suspicion by the Union of South Africa, Britain's prewar plans for defending their African empire were centered on making use of the skilled white manpower of 2 Rhodesia and Kenya. Added to this was the willingness and apparent positive reception by white Rhodesians of black units in the Southern Rhodesian army, a break with the exclusively all-white tradition that prevailed up until then. The political capital accrued to Southern Rhodesia because of its close cooperation with Britain was perhaps the significant factor in the establishment of the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland in 1953 which included Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland. The Federation was Southern Rhodesia's supreme political achievement and the closest it came to legal independence and international respectability. THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEFENSE FORCES OF NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN RHODESIA FROM 1890 TO 1945 by EUGENE PETER JARRETT POMEROY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY Portland State University 1994 DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to all of those people who assisted and encouraged me over the period I spent researching and writing. First I would like to thank the History Department at Portland State for showing me that formal learning can be fun, something that I had not experienced since kindergarten. Among those at PSU are Dr. Jon Mandaville, my advisor, and Dr. Jim Heath, whom I first spoke to about taking on the Master's program. A word of thanks to Dr. Lewis Gann of the Hoover Institution and Dr. Richard Wood of the University of Durban-Westville in South Africa. Thanks also to Colonel (Ret.) Curt Welch for his insights. To my old comrade-in-arms Roger England in whose garret in Grtmsbury, Oxfordshire, I lived for a year and a half. Many thanks to Anthea Bazin of the Oxford Academy who hired me and where I taught ESL for over a year allowing me to survive and complete my research. I would like to acknowledge the good people at the Banbury branch of the Oxfordshire County library system who bent over backwards to get those hard-to-find books. A mention to the nice ladies at the Grimsbury Post Office. Many thanks to Luanne Bradshaw & family, my cousin Jade Collins and others who allowed me to sleep on couches and fed me from time to time when I was cold and hungry. Last but not least, my Aunt, Catherine Pomeroy Collins, who never lost faith in me, a special word of affection and thanks for everything. To my parents, whom I love. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE DEDICATION ................................................................................................................... i I IN1R.ODUCI10N ............................................................................................... l I I IN THE BEGINNING ....................................................................................... 6 III SOUTHERN RHODESIA'S FIRST ARMY; The British South Africa Police, 1890-1926 ...................................... 10 IV NORTHERN RHODESIA'S ARMY; Origins of the Northern Rhodesia Regiment, 1891-1945 ............ 28 V THE SOUTHERN RHODESIAN ARMY, 1926-1945 ......................... 40 The :Defense Act of 1926................................................................ 40 The Southern Rhodesia Staff Corps........................................... 48 The Southern Rhodesia Council of Defense ............................ 50 VI STANDING GUARD; African soldiers, the British Empire, and Southern Rhcxlesia............................................................................... 53 The Royal West African Frontier Force and the King's African Rifles, 1800s-1945 ...................................... 53 Failure of the All-White Army and the Rhodesia Native Regiment, 1914-1918 ........................... 59 The Rhcxlesian African Rifles, 1940-1945 .............................. 66 VII THE ALLIANCE; Britain, Southern Rhodesia and the African Colonial Forces, 1935-1945 ...................................... 71 VIII WHITE RHODESIAN UNITS IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR ....... 80 iii IX THE QUEST FOR AIR POWER; the Rhodesian Air Force, 1934-1945 .................................................... 88 X DIFFICULT ALLIES; South Africa, Southern Rhodesia and the Second World War....................................................................... 100 XI CONCLUSION; the Beginning of the End.......................................... 120 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In 1991 the RAND Corporation's Arroyo Center, which is funded by the United States Army as their research and development center, issued a report on the Rhodesian counterinsurgency campaign which began in 1972 and lasted until 1980 when white minority rule came to an end with the creation of Zimbabwe. The aim was to compare Rhodesia's experience with America's in El Salvador and Vietnam. What the authors found was that many of the strengths and weaknesses of the Rhodesians reflected much of what had been acquired before and during the Second World War. 1 How was it that a small country in south central Africa, ruled by a small white minority, was able to do this? The fact that Rhodesia has passed into history does not diminish from its military accomplishments.2 From the arrival of the Pioneer Column in 1890, defense, to a greater or lesser degree, concerned the settler community and their descendants. This thesis follows the development of Southern Rhodesia's defense forces from the arrival of the settlers in 1890 until the end of 1 For the sake of simplicity and brevity, 'Rhodesian' will always refer to the white population. 2 The black-ruled nation now known as Zimbabwe was Southern Rhodesia from the 1890s until 1964. In that year Northern Rhodesia became Zambia and the 'Southern' prefix was dropped from Rhodesia's name. Nyasaland is now Malawi. 2 the Second World War in 1945 at which time Southern Rhodesia was to enter a new era as the 'senior partner' of the Central African Federation. This study deals almost exclusively with the military aspects of Rhodesian history between 1890 and 1945 but does not attempt to find explanations for broader social and political developments which have been dealt with more extensively than here. From 1890 until the defense buildup of the 1930s, Rhodesians' military fears and prejudices were, with the exception of the Boer War and First World War, primarily directed at the larger African population. After 1935 and the Italian invasion of Ethiopia, Southern Rhodesia entered a defense agreement with Britain which completely altered the focus and direction of Southern Rhodesia's defense force from the perceived internal threat to the wider external threat. This study is divided up into headings according to the military unit being examined and attempts follows a chronological format inasmuch as that is possible. The original intent was to examine just the Rhodesian Army and its origins, but this
Recommended publications
  • Survey of British Colonial Development Policy
    No. E 68-A RESTRICTED r:;: ONE '\f ..- tf\rhi.§..l report is restricted to use within the Bank Public Disclosure Authorized INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Public Disclosure Authorized SURVEY OF BRITISH COLONIAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY November 9. 1949 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Economic Department Prepared by: B. King TABLE OF CONTE.t-J'TS Page No. I. PREFACE (and Map) • • • • • • • • • t • • .. .. i II. SPi!IMARY • • •••• .. .. ., . , . · .. iv , . III. THE COLONIES UP TO 1940' •• .. .. .. .. • • • 1 TJi.BLES I '& II • .'. .. • • • • • • • • 8 . IV. THE COLONIES SINCE, 1940 ••• • • • • • • • • 10 TABlES III to VI • • • 0 • • • • • • • • 29 APPElIIDIX - THE CURRENCY SYSTEMS OF' THE cOtOlUAL EI'!PlRE .....,,,.,. 34 (i) I. PREFACE The British Colonial :empire is a sO!!lm-:hat loose expression embracing some forty dependencies of the United Kingdom. For the purposes of this paper the term vdll be used to cover all dependencies administered through the Colonial Office on December 31" 1948 cmd" in addition, the three :30uth African High Cowmission territories, which are under the control of the Commonwealth Relations Office. This definition is adopted" since its scope is the same as that of the various Acts of Parliament passed since lSll.~O to Dovcloptx;nt promote colomal development, including the Overseas Resourceshct y::rLcl1 established the Colonial Development Corporation. A full list of the~e ter:-itories 17ill be found in the list following. It [;hould be noted th'lt in conform..i.ty vri th the provisions of the recent Acts vIhieh apply only to flcolonies not possessing responsible govermnent,uYthe definition given above excludes the self-governing colony of Southern :Ehodesia, v(nose rela- tions with the United Kinr;dom are conducted through the Co:nmonlrealth Relations Office.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, C.1950-53
    ‘It has united us far more closely than any other question would have accomplished’.1 The African Dimension to the Anti-Federation Struggle, c.1950-53 The documentary record of African opposition to the C[entral] A[frican] F[ederation] has been the subject renewed historiographical interest in recent years.2 This paper seeks to contribute to the existing debate in three principle ways. Firstly, it will be shown that opposition to the scheme was fatally undermined by the pursuit of two very distinct strands of N[yasaland] A[frican] C[ongress] and A[frican] N[ational] C[ongress] political activism. This dissimilar political discourse produced contradictions that resulted in the bypassing African objections. In the third instance, the paper will go a step further, suggesting that the two respective anti-Federation campaigns not only undermined Congress efforts to stop federation, but laid the path for future discord in the national dispensation then materialising. In 1988, John Darwin wrote that ‘with its telescope clapped firmly to its ear, London declared that [African] opposition [to Federation] could be neither seen nor heard’.3 The well-worn historiographical path points to the fact that African opposition was effectively ignored on the basis that ‘partnership’ between white settlers and black Africans in Northern and Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland offered a strong rationale for the CAF. The requisite benefits arising would see the promotion of African economic opportunities, the placation of settler politicians seeking to reduce the influence of the Colonial Office and the preservation of British influence in the region.4 The utility of ‘partnership’ was in its ambiguity.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Resolution Were Reserved for the Europeans Alone
    United Nations FOURTH COMMITTEE, 1363rd GENERAL MEETING ASSEMBLY Friday, 26 October 1962, at 3,45 p.m. SEVENTEENTH SESSION 0 f/icial Records • NEW YORK CONTENTS failed to appreciate the seriousness of the crisis Page threatening Southern Rhodesia. Agenda item 56: 3. During the forty years which had elapsed since Question of Southern Rhodesia: report of the the first Constitution had been granted to the settlers Special Committee established under Gen­ in 1923, the Government of Southern Rhodesia had eral Assembly resolution 1654 (XVI) (con­ done practically nothing to prepare the people for tinued) self-government. Now a new Constitution was about to General debate (continued). • . 221 be introduced in order to perpetuate white domination for centuries to come. The people of Southern Rho­ Chairman: Mr. Guillermo FLORES AVENDANO desia had shown great tolerance during the longyears of white minority rule, but no self-respecting people (Guatemala). would be content with fifteen seats in the legislatl}re to represent 3 million as against fifty seats for the 250,000 white settlers. Over the years the white In the absence of the Chairman, Mr. Nabavi (Iran), settler Parliament in Southern Rhodesia had enacted Vice-Chairman, took the Chair. many repressive laws which had turned the country into a police State in the heart of the peaceful African continent. The Africans in Southern Rhodesia were AGENDA ITEM 56 subjected to economic exploitation; their wages were Question of Southern Rhodesia: report of the Special Com­ kept below subsistence level and certain positions mittee established under General Assembly resolution were reserved for the Europeans alone.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 9 on 1 April 1924 Administration by the British South
    CHAPTER 9 On 1 April 1924 administration by the British South Africa Company ended and the Colonial Office took over direct responsibility for the government of Northern Rhodesia. Herbert James Stanley CMG was appointed the first Governor and Commander in Chief of the Territory. He was to be knighted later in the year. Herbert Stanley had joined the staff of the High Commissioner in South Africa in 1910 and was Resident Commissioner for Southern and Northern Rhodesia from 1915 until 1918. He had then become Imperial Secretary in South Africa. He was, therefore, well qualified for his new post. He was received at Government House by Colonel Stennett and inspected a guard of honour 100 strong under Major Dickinson accompanied by the band. Captain Castle acted as the Governor's ADC for the swearing in ceremony. Things did not go so smoothly for Stanley's first visit to Fort Jameson on 10 July. Captain Graham dismissed the guard of honour at dusk and the Governor arrived later that evening having been delayed in the two day motor journey from Blantyre, Nyasaland. The quickest route from Livingstone to Fort Jameson was still via Southern Rhodesia and Nyasaland. On 11 July Stanley inspected the police camp, gaol and other government buildings and lunched with Captain and Mrs Graham. On 12 July he held an indaba for which the Chewa formed up on the right, the Akunda on the left and the Ngoni, still organised in regiments, held centre stage. After the speechmaking by the Governor and chiefs, there were sports for all races, organised by Captain Graham.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa: Background, May 1977, Part 3
    , , . STATE~iENT OF PRINCIPLES OF U. S. FIRNS WITH AFFILIATES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA . 1. Non-segregation of the races in all eating, comfort, and ,,,ork facili ties. 2. Eoual, and fair .employment practices for all employees. 3. Equal pay for all employees doing equal or comparable work for the same period of t~me. 4 • Initiation of and development of training program~ that will prepare, in substan~ial numbers, blacks and,other non-whites for supervisory, administrative, clerlcal, and t echnical jobs. ~ . 5 . Incr~asing the number of blacks and other non-~lites in manag~ment and supervisory positions. 6. Improving the qualitY ' of employees' lives outside the work cnvi rO])Hl en t in such are as as hOl.S ing, tl'?nsporta U 0] )" school i ng, recreation and health facilities. We :lg 'r- Ct:: to fU 'rther implement these principles . Wh<;!te,J j~P l. (;':.:J:: : 1J~ E . ~.... iol1 requires a modification of existjng' South African . '\mrkir.q . con(iit:Lc:-;s . I we will seek s uch modification throug]l appropriate' ch ~ nnels. , . We be 1 i eve that the implementation of the foregoing pri n::.5.ples . Is t. consistent with respect for human dignity and will con t ribute grea t ly I to the general e~o;)omic vlelfare of all the people of the Republic. of South Afl"ica ~ . ; .' • • . r • •• t ... •..... h • • • • _ .... .t ... ;" ~ . " . , .t· - .- MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT WASHINGTON UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION Memo No. 861-77 April 20, 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT THRU: Denis Clift ~ FROM: Jay Katzen ~ SUBJECT: Anatomy of a Rebel, by Peter Joyce Attached, at Tab A, is a synopsis of the subject book, as you requested.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colonial Government and the Great Depression in Northern
    THE COLONIAL GOVERNMENT AND THE GREAT DEPRESSION IN NORTHERN RHODESIA: ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGISLATIVE CHANGES, 1929-1939 BY MBOZI SANTEBE A Dissertation Submitted to the University of Zambia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History THE UNIVERSITY OF ZAMBIA LUSAKA © 2015 i DECLARATION I, Mbozi Santebe, declare that this dissertation (a) Represents my own work; (b) Has not previously been submitted for a degree at this or any other University; and (c) Does not incorporate any published work or material from another dissertation. Signed …………………………………………………………………………………….. Date ……………………………………………………………………………………... ii COPYRIGHT All rights reserved. No part of this dissertation may be reproduced or stored in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from the author or the University of Zambia. iii APPROVAL This dissertation of Mbozi Santebe is approved as fulfilling the partial requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Arts in History by the University of Zambia. Date Signed ………………………………………………. …………………………….. Signed ………………………………………………. …………………………….. Signed ………………………………………………. …………………………….. iv ABSTRACT This study focuses on the administrative and legislative changes that the colonial government made in response to the impact of the Great Depression in Northern Rhodesia. It reveals that the government mainly responded to the decline in government revenues, the widespread poverty and destitution and the distortion of internal trade. The study shows that during the emergency period, 1932-1934, the administration made changes to government structures and functioning so as to curtail expenditure and balance its budget. It reorganised staff in the public service, reduced budgetary allocations to departments and realigned several departments and provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Names, Currency, and Acronyms
    PLACE- NAMES, CURRENCY, AND ACRONYMS The convention of historical writing of the country this book is about is to include a list of place- names in the front matter, with Rhodesian names on one side and the Zimbabwean names on the other. I will not do that here. The country I write about had four names between 1960 and 1980; what these were and how they changed are discussed at the start of the first chap- ter. I avoid such lists because of my concerns about a notion of before- and- after in history: a list of place-n ames and their changes suggests a too pat transformation from colony to nation, from bad to good, from minority to majority rule. Such a list also suggests that transitions are instantaneous, that a threshold has been crossed. For the reco rd, however, Rhodesia be- came Southern Rhodesia from mid- December 1979 to April 1980, when it became Zimbabwe. Salisbury, the capital, became Harare only in 1982. More common and never part of any list has been the tendency to use “Rhodesian” to mean white and “Zimbabwean” to mean African. I have tried to avoid this as often as I could throughout this book. With the breakup of the Central African Federation, Rhodesia named its currency the pound (£). Cast out of the sterling zone shortly a fter the Unilateral Declaration of In de pen dence (udi), Rhodesia valued its pound at US$2. In 1970, Rhodesia adopted the dollar as its currency. It was de- signed to be valued at half a British pound and between 1970 and 1980 hovered at about US$1.50.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION of SURINAM 1920-1970 to Norine VERHANDELINGEN VAN HET KONINKLIJK INSTITUUT VOOR T AAL-, LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE
    THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF SURINAM 1920-1970 To Norine VERHANDELINGEN VAN HET KONINKLIJK INSTITUUT VOOR T AAL-, LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE 65 THE DEMOGRAPHIC EVOLUTION OF SURINAM 1920 - 1970 A socio-demographic analysis H. E. LAMUR THE HAGUE - MAR TINUS NIJHOFF 1973 I.S.B.N. 90.247.1556.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish first and foremost to record my thanks to Professor W. Steigenga for his constant guidance and encouragement. I am also grateful to him for the freedom he allowed me, both as regards the framework of the investigation and the analysis of the data collected. His critical approach contributed in no small degree to the study being brought to a successful conclusion, and my only hope is that I have succeeded in making fuIl use of his commen tso I also wish to express my gratitude to Professor A. J. F. Köbben for his criticism and valuable suggestions. The data for the study were collected and partially processed by H. A. C. Boldewijn, W. J. Doest, D. P. Kaulesar Sukul, R. 1. Korsten, M. R. Kortram, A. R. Lamur and H. C. Limburg. Their enthusiasm, which never faltered even through the trying periods when the data were being gathered, afforded me great support. I owe them my warm est thanks. I am also grateful to Mr. J. Pinas for his assistance. For permis sion to collect the data for this study 1 wish to thank the District Commissioners, the Heads of the Offices for Population Administration and the Head of the Central Office for Population Administration. When subjecting some of the data to statistical analysis I enlisted the aid of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • History 1886
    How many bones must you bury before you can call yourself an African? Updated December 2009 A South African Diary: Contested Identity, My Family - Our Story Part D: 1886 - 1909 Compiled by: Dr. Anthony Turton [email protected] Caution in the use and interpretation of these data This document consists of events data presented in chronological order. It is designed to give the reader an insight into the complex drivers at work over time, by showing how many events were occurring simultaneously. It is also designed to guide future research by serious scholars, who would verify all data independently as a matter of sound scholarship and never accept this as being valid in its own right. Read together, they indicate a trend, whereas read in isolation, they become sterile facts devoid of much meaning. Given that they are “facts”, their origin is generally not cited, as a fact belongs to nobody. On occasion where an interpretation is made, then the commentator’s name is cited as appropriate. Where similar information is shown for different dates, it is because some confusion exists on the exact detail of that event, so the reader must use caution when interpreting it, because a “fact” is something over which no alternate interpretation can be given. These events data are considered by the author to be relevant, based on his professional experience as a trained researcher. Own judgement must be used at all times . All users are urged to verify these data independently. The individual selection of data also represents the author’s bias, so the dataset must not be regarded as being complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Distr. LIMITED CDCC 22-3/Add.1 LC/CAR/L.162/Add.1 14 April 2008 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
    1 Distr. LIMITED CDCC 22-3/Add.1 LC/CAR/L.162/Add.1 14 April 2008 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH REPORT ON THE MEETINGS CONVENED In Biennium 2006 - 2007 [Covering the period 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2007] Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) P.O Box 1113, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago • Phone: (868) 623-5595 • Fax: (868) 623-8485 • www.eclacpos.org 1 MEETINGS CONVENED BY THE SUBREGIONAL HEADQUARTERS FOR THE CARIBBEAN since January 2006 Programme Description Venue No. Representatives/Experts from Budget Duration member States in attendance Code INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEETINGS 116214 Twenty First session of the CDCC 16-17 January Port of Spain 59 Barbados; Belize; Cuba; Dominican session [LC/CAR/L.86] 2006 Republic; Guyana; Jamaica; St. Lucia; Suriname; Trinidad & Tobago; Aruba, British Virgin Islands; Montserrat; Puerto Rico; US Virgin Islands; FAO; UNDP; UNEP/CAR/RCU; UNESCO; UNIFEM; PAHO;WHO; ACS; CARICAD; CARICOM; CDERA; IICA; CRNM; UWI 122802 High-level ministerial dialogue – 14-15 June Antigua and Barbuda 31 Antigua & Barbuda; Barbados; Social Security and sustainable 2006 Dominica; Jamaica; St.Kitts and development in the Caribbean Nevis; Suriname; Trinidad & Tobago; [LC/CAR/L.92] CDB; CIDA; OECS; DFID; ILO; OECS; UNDP; UNIFEM 119163-1 Caribbean Preparatory meeting for 22-24 May Antigua and Barbuda 51 Antigua & Barbuda; Belize; the tenth session of the Regional 2007 Dominica; Dominican Republic; Conference on women in Latin Grenada; Haiti; Jamaica; St. Lucia; America and the Caribbean St. Kitts/Nevis; St. Vincent and the [LC/CAR/L.127] Grenadines; Suriname; British Virgin Islands; Netherlands Antilles; Turks & Caicos; Cayman Islands; Consejo de Mujeres (Ecuador); OHCHR; UNFPA; UNIFEM; CIDA; CARICOM; CGDS 2 Programme Description Venue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Somali State
    Rethinking the Somali State MPP Professional Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Public Policy Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Aman H.D. Obsiye May 2017 Signature below of Paper Supervisor certifies successful completion of oral presentation and completion of final written version: _________________________________ ____________________ ___________________ Dr. Mary Curtin, Diplomat in Residence Date, oral presentation Date, paper completion Paper Supervisor ________________________________________ ___________________ Steven Andreasen, Lecturer Date Second Committee Member Signature of Second Committee Member, certifying successful completion of professional paper Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 5 The Somali Clan System .......................................................................................................... 6 The Colonial Era ..................................................................................................................... 9 British Somaliland Protectorate ................................................................................................. 9 Somalia Italiana and the United Nations Trusteeship .............................................................. 14 Colonial
    [Show full text]
  • The Naturalist and His 'Beautiful Islands'
    The Naturalist and his ‘Beautiful Islands’ Charles Morris Woodford in the Western Pacific David Russell Lawrence The Naturalist and his ‘Beautiful Islands’ Charles Morris Woodford in the Western Pacific David Russell Lawrence Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Lawrence, David (David Russell), author. Title: The naturalist and his ‘beautiful islands’ : Charles Morris Woodford in the Western Pacific / David Russell Lawrence. ISBN: 9781925022032 (paperback) 9781925022025 (ebook) Subjects: Woodford, C. M., 1852-1927. Great Britain. Colonial Office--Officials and employees--Biography. Ethnology--Solomon Islands. Natural history--Solomon Islands. Colonial administrators--Solomon Islands--Biography. Solomon Islands--Description and travel. Dewey Number: 577.099593 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover image: Woodford and men at Aola on return from Natalava (PMBPhoto56-021; Woodford 1890: 144). Cover design and layout by ANU Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2014 ANU Press Contents Acknowledgments . xi Note on the text . xiii Introduction . 1 1 . Charles Morris Woodford: Early life and education . 9 2. Pacific journeys . 25 3 . Commerce, trade and labour . 35 4 . A naturalist in the Solomon Islands . 63 5 . Liberalism, Imperialism and colonial expansion . 139 6 . The British Solomon Islands Protectorate: Colonialism without capital . 169 7 . Expansion of the Protectorate 1898–1900 .
    [Show full text]