DOCSLIB.ORG

Formalization and Modeling of Human Values for Recipient Sentiment Prediction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Formalization and Modeling of Human Values for Recipient Sentiment Prediction Formalization and Modeling of Human Values for Recipient Sentiment Prediction Doctor of Philosophy OBINNA CHINEDU ONYIMADU Informatics Research Centre Henley Business School September 2017 Declaration I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. Obinna Chinedu Onyimadu ii Abstract Sentiment analysis is viewed generally as a text classification problem involving the prediction of the semantic orientation of a text. Much of the analysis has focused on the sentiment expressed in the sentence or by the writer but not the sentiment of the recipient. For example, the sentence “Housing costs have dropped significantly” might be assigned a negative classification by a sentiment analysis model, however humans from different works of life might express different sentiments. A landlord will likely express a negative sentiment while a renter might express a positive sentiment. Therefore, traditional sentiment analysis methods fail to capture the human centric aspects that motivate diverse sentiments. Additionally, attempts at predicting recipient sentiment have involved considerable human effort in the form of content analysis and empirical surveys, making the process expensive and time-consuming. Thus, the aim of this research is to develop a method of recipient sentiment analysis that is devoid of human input in the form of annotations or empirical surveys. The approach taken in this research involves applying a model of human values towards recipient sentiment prediction. The justification for this approach is based on the well-established principle that values influence human behaviour of which sentiment is a form. Therefore, if a persons’ values can be modelled quantitatively, when presented with some text, in theory the sentiment of the recipient can be predicted. This research proposes that the application of values in developing sentences is a generative process, that can be represented as a language model. A mechanism called Feature Switching (FS) that enables the determination of recipient’s sentiment from the value language model is also discussed. The resulting sentiment prediction model has an accuracy in the range of 72.2%-72.5% which is in and about the range of performance of existing systems which make use of content analysis and human annotated data. iii Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Dr Keiichi Nakata for his excellent supervision and support for making this thesis a reality. His invaluable suggestions and critical comments were key to the completion of this thesis. I would also like to acknowledge staff at the IRC and my friends for the many enlightening discussions we had at various points during this research. Finally, I want to acknowledge God almighty, without whom I would have been unable to complete this thesis. Obinna Chinedu Onyimadu September 2017 iv Dedications This thesis is dedicated to my parents, brothers and especially my wife. You all made the journey a lot easier and enjoyable. God Bless. v Table of Contents Declaration .............................................................................................................................. ii Abstract .................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................iv Dedications .............................................................................................................................. v Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES .....................................................................................................................xi LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ xiii 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Aims and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Overview of Research Methodology .......................................................................... 4 1.3 Thesis Structure ........................................................................................................... 4 2. Sentiment Analysis as a Field of Study............................................................................... 6 2.1 Brief History of Sentiment Analysis ........................................................................... 6 2.2 SA Methods and Problems .......................................................................................... 8 2.3 Review of Author/Reader Stand Point ..................................................................... 12 2.3.1 Writer/Author Emotion and Stance .................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Recipient Emotion and Stance Detection ........................................................... 14 2.3.3 Socio-Theoretic Approaches ................................................................................. 15 2.4 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 17 3. Values as a Field of Study .............................................................................................. 18 3.1 Definition of Values ................................................................................................... 18 3.2 Classification, Formalization and Application of Values ....................................... 19 3.3 Classification Methodology ...................................................................................... 21 3.3.1 Selection and Identification of Value Items ........................................................ 21 3.3.2 Categorization of items to inventories ................................................................ 22 3.4 Value Inventories ....................................................................................................... 22 3.4.1 Rokeach Value Survey (RVS) ................................................................................ 22 3.4.2 Schwartz Value Inventory (SVI) ........................................................................... 22 3.4.3 Personal Values Questionnaire (PVQ) ................................................................ 23 3.4.4 List of Values (LOV) .......................................................................................... 23 3.5 Building a Value Inventory ....................................................................................... 24 3.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 26 4. Research Methodology ...................................................................................................... 27 4.1 DSR Methodology ...................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Design Steps ..................................................................................................................... 28 vi 4.2.1 Step 1: Awareness of problem ............................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Step 2: Suggestion .............................................................................................. 29 4.2.3 Step 3: Development .............................................................................................. 31 4.2.4 Step 4: Evaluation .............................................................................................. 31 4.2.5 Step 5: Conclusions ............................................................................................ 31 4.3 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 31 5. Model Design – A model of Sentiment and Values .......................................................... 32 5.1 Characteristics of Values ........................................................................................... 32 5.2 Description of Value-Sentiment Model Processes ................................................. 33 5.3 Value Model – Decomposition of Values....................................................................... 36 5.4 VSM Parameter Identification of Value-Laden Utterances ................................... 40 5.4.1 Identifying Value Subject ...................................................................................... 42 5.4.2 Identifying Value Actions .................................................................................. 44 5.4.3 Identifying Value States ........................................................................................ 45 5.5 Complex Value Laden Sentences ............................................................................. 48 5.5.1 Compound Sentences ............................................................................................ 49 5.5.2 Complex Sentences ................................................................................................ 50 5.6 Structural Representation of Value Laden Sentences ............................................ 52
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix to Memorandum of Law on Behalf of United
    APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF OF UNITED KINGDOM AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARIANS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LIST OF AMICI HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT House of Lords The Lord Ahmed The Lord Alderdice The Lord Alton of Liverpool, CB The Rt Hon the Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC PC The Lord Avebury The Lord Berkeley, OBE The Lord Bhatia, OBE The Viscount Bledisloe, QC The Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury The Rt Hon the Baroness Boothroyd, OM PC The Lord Borrie, QC The Rt Hon the Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone, DL PC The Lord Bowness, CBE DL The Lord Brennan, QC The Lord Bridges, GCMG The Rt Hon the Lord Brittan of Spennithorne, QC DL PC The Rt Hon the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville, CH PC The Viscount Brookeborough, DL The Rt Hon the Lord Browne-Wilkinson, PC The Lord Campbell of Alloway, ERD QC The Lord Cameron of Dillington The Rt Hon the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, QC The Rt Rev and Rt Hon the Lord Carey of Clifton, PC The Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC The Baroness Chapman The Lord Chidgey The Lord Clarke of Hampstead, CBE The Lord Clement-Jones, CBE The Rt Hon the Lord Clinton-Davis, PC The Lord Cobbold, DL The Lord Corbett of Castle Vale The Rt Hon the Baroness Corston, PC The Lord Dahrendorf, KBE The Lord Dholakia, OBE DL The Lord Donoughue The Baroness D’Souza, CMG The Lord Dykes The Viscount Falkland The Baroness Falkner of Margravine The Lord Faulkner of Worcester The Rt Hon the
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Poll
    SOMERSET COUNTY COUNCIL ELECTION OF A COUNTY COUNCILLOR FROME EAST DIVISION NOTICE OF POLL Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of A COUNTY COUNCILLOR for the FROME EAST DIVISION will be held on THURSDAY 4 MAY 2017, between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM 2. The names, addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated and the names of all the persons signing the Candidates nomination papers are as follows: Name of Candidate Address Description Names of Persons who have signed the Nomination Paper Eve 9 Whitestone Road The Conservative J M Harris M Bristow BERRY Frome Party Candidate B Harris P Bristow Somerset Kelvin Lum V Starr BA11 2DN Jennifer J Lum S L Pomeroy J Bristow J A Bowers Martin John Briars Green Party G Collinson Andrew J Carpenter DIMERY Innox Hill K Harley R Waller Frome J White T Waller Somerset M Wride M E Phillips BA11 2LW E Carpenter J Thomas Alvin John 1 Hillside House Liberal Democrats A Eyers C E Potter HORSFALL Keyford K M P Rhodes A Boyden Frome Deborah J Webster S Hillman BA11 1LB J P Grylls T Eames A J Shingler J Lewis David Alan 35 Alexandra Road Labour Party William Lowe Barry Cooper OAKENSEN Frome Jean Lowe R Burnett Somerset M R Cox Karen Burnett BA11 1LX K A Cooper A R Howard S Norwood J Singer 3. The situation of the Polling Stations for the above election and the Local Government electors entitled to vote are as follows: Description of Persons entitled to Vote Situation of Polling Stations Polling Station No Local Government Electors whose names appear on the Register of Electors for the said Electoral Area for the current year.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory Liberal Democrats Autumn Conference Bournemouth 14–17 September 2019
    DIRECTORY LIBERAL DEMOCRATS AUTUMN CONFERENCE BOURNEMOUTH 14–17 SEPTEMBER 2019 Clear Print This clear print / large text version of the Conference Directory matches as closely as possible the text of the published Directory. Page number cross references are correct within this clear print document. Some information may appear in a different place from its location in the published Directory. Complex layouts and graphics have been omitted. It is black and white omn A4 pages for ease of printing. The Agenda and Directory and other conference publications, in PDF, plain text and clear print formats, are available online at www.libdems.org.uk/conference_papers Page 1 Directory Liberal Democrats Autumn Conference 2019 Clearprint Welcome to the Liberal Democrat 2019 conference Directory. If you have any questions whilst at conference please ask a conference steward or go to the Information Desk on the ground floor of the Bournemouth International Centre. Conference venue Bournemouth International Centre (BIC) Exeter Road, Bournemouth, BH2 5BH. Please note that the BIC is within the secure zone and that access is only possible with a valid conference pass. Conference hotel Bournemouth Highcliff Marriott St Michael’s Rd, West Cliff, Bournemouth, BH2 5DU. Further information, registration and conference publications (including plain text and clear print versions) are available at: www.libdems.org.uk/conference For information about the main auditorium sessions, see the separate conference Agenda. DEMAND BETTER THAN BREXIT Page 2 Directory Liberal Democrats Autumn Conference 2019 Clearprint Contents Feature . 4–5 Our time is now by Jo Swinson MP Conference information: . 6–13 Exhibition: . 14–26 List of exhibitors .
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Process
    House of Commons Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 HC 1097 House of Commons Modernisation of the House of Commons The Legislative Process First Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 25 July 2006 HC 1097 Published on 7 September 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons The Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons is appointed by the House of Commons to consider how the House operates and to make recommendations for modernisation. Current membership Mr Jack Straw (Labour, Blackburn) (Chairman) Mr Paul Burstow, (Liberal Democrat, Sutton & Cheam) Ms Dawn Butler (Labour, Brent South) Ann Coffey (Labour, Stockport) Mr George Howarth (Labour, Knowsley North & Sefton East) Mr Greg Knight (Conservative, Yorkshire East) Mark Lazarowicz (Labour/Co-operative, Edinburgh North and Leith) Mrs Theresa May (Conservative, Maidenhead) Mr Adrian Sanders, (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Mr Richard Shepherd (Conservative, Aldridge-Brownhills) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester Blackley) Paddy Tipping (Labour, Sherwood) Mr Edward Vaizey (Conservative, Wantage) Lynda Waltho (Labour, Stourbridge) Sir Nicholas Winterton (Conservative, Macclesfield) The following Members were also members of the Committee during the Parliament: Liz Blackman (Labour, Erewash) Chris Grayling (Conservative, Epsom and Ewell) Mr David Heath (Liberal Democrat, Somerton and Frome) Mr Geoffrey Hoon (Labour, Ashfield) (Chairman) Jessica Morden (Labour, Newport East) Andrew Stunell (Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove) Powers The powers of the Committee are set out in an Appendix to the House of Commons Standing Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of UK Political Leadership on the Environment Since the 2010
    A review of UK political leadership on the environment since the 2010 general election GREEN STANDARD 2013 Green Standard 2013 © Green Alliance 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- A review of UK political leadership on the Noncommercial-No derivative works environment since the 2010 general election 3.0 unported licence. This does not replace copyright but gives certain by: rights without having to ask Green Alliance for permission. Campaign for Better Transport, Friends of the Under this licence, this work may Earth, Greenpeace, Green Alliance, RSPB, The be shared freely. It provides the Wildlife Trusts and WWF. freedom to copy, distribute and transmit this work on to others, provided text is unaltered. This work Acknowledgements must not be resold or used for Thanks to the following individuals for their input: commercial purposes. These Richard Benwell, Ruth Davis, Penny Evans, conditions can be waived under certain circumstances with the written Andrew Farmer, Joss Garman, Owen Gibbons, permission of Green Alliance. For Alastair Harper, Richard Hebditch, Stephen more information about this licence Hinchley, Donna Hume, Liz Hutchins, Harry go to http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Huyton, Elaine King, Hannah Kyrke-Smith, Gareth Morgan, Doug Parr, Andrew Pendleton, Hazel Phillips, Ellie Robinson, George Smeeton, Ben Stafford and Matt Trimmer. Published by Green Alliance September 2013 ISBN 978-1-905869-96-1 Green Alliance 36 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 0RE T 020 7233 7433 [email protected] www.green-alliance.org.uk blog: greenallianceblog.org.uk twitter: @GreenAllianceUK The Green Alliance Trust Registered charity no.
    [Show full text]
  • Leader of the House of Commons
    LEADER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday 16 June 2010 Parliamentary reform: the Coalition Government's agenda after Wright Speech by Sir George Young Bt MP, Leader of the House of Commons to the Hansard Society, London Introduction Thank you, Peter, for that introduction, and thank you to the Hansard Society for inviting me to speak to you this evening. This is my first keynote speech since becoming Leader of the House (and indeed Lord Privy Seal - although I hope you'll forgive me if I move rather swiftly over that part of the job, which no one has quite explained to me yet); and it gives me an opportunity to offer some reflections on this remarkable new world which was created by the electorate on May 6 - and also to lay the ground for what I hope will be a productive and even unprecedented period of parliamentary reform. In that vein, I'm with the Speaker when he said to you here last week that this is a "truly wonderful time to be in Parliament". He and I are both reformers at heart - and we've only ever had one minor disagreement a year ago about which of us should be Speaker, when I came second. But on parliamentary reform, we come from a very similar place - and, judging from his speech last week, it is a pleasure to be heading alongside him in a very similar direction. Coalition Politics Before I address the process of change in Parliament, I thought I would share with you a few personal observations about how the new Government is operating; comparing my fourteen years as a Minister under Margaret Thatcher then John Major in a single party administration with just over fourteen days under David Cameron and Nick Clegg in a coalition.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabinet Committee System
    CABINET COMMITTEE SYSTEM 1. Cabinet and Cabinet Committees are groups of Ministers that can take collective decisions that are binding across Government. The Cabinet is the supreme decision-making body in government, dealing with the big issues of the day and the Government’s overall strategy. Cabinet Committees reduce the burden on Cabinet by enabling collective decisions to be taken by a smaller group of Ministers. The composition and terms of reference of Coalition Cabinet Committees are a matter for the Prime Minister, in consultation with the Deputy Prime Minister. 2. The Coalition Committee is a formal Committee of Cabinet which meets to consider issues relating to the operation of the Coalition. It is co-chaired by The Prime Minister and The Deputy Prime Minister. 3. Each Committee has a Chair from one Party and a Deputy Chair from the other Party. The Chair and Deputy Chair have the right to remit an issue to the Coalition Committee if it affects the operation of the Coalition and cannot be resolved by the originating Committee. The use of this right will be kept to a minimum. 4. With the approval of the Chair (with the exception of those Committees requiring limited or specific attendance due to the nature of the discussion) Ministers are able to send a deputy from either their Department or their Party, as appropriate, to Committee meetings. 5. The Coalition Operation and Strategic Planning Group is a working group and is not a Cabinet Committee. It is co-chaired by the Minister of State – Cabinet Office and the Chief Secretary to the Treasury.
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNIVERSITY of HULL Do Committees Make A
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL Do Committees Make a Difference? An Examination of the Viscosity of Legislative Committees in the British House of Commons being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by Louise Thompson, BA (Hons), MA May 2013 Acknowledgements The submission of this thesis brings my time as a student in the Department of Politics and International Studies to an end. The ten years I have spent as a student here have been the very happiest and the most enjoyable. There was only ever one university at which I wanted to study, hence why I stayed so long. I have always found the department and its staff to be extremely warm, welcoming and supportive. I will always look back on these years in the department with much affection and will be incredibly sad to leave. Whilst I owe a debt of gratitude to all of the academic and administrative staff for making my time here so memorable; very special thanks must go to two people in particular. Firstly, to Professor the Lord Norton of Louth. From my very first day as an undergraduate student, through my undergraduate dissertation, a Master’s degree and now the submission of this thesis he has acted as my academic supervisor. I therefore thank him for a decade of advice and guidance. His supervision and counsel in preparing this thesis has been invaluable and has kept me on the right path whenever I have started to wander. Secondly to Dr Cristina Leston-Bandeira; my supervisor, mentor and friend, for her never ending supply of advice and words of wisdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Mendip in Somerset
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Mendip in Somerset Further electoral review August 2006 1 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents What is the Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 19 2 Current electoral arrangements 23 3 Draft recommendations 27 4 Responses to consultation 29 5 Analysis and final recommendations 31 Electorate figures 31 Council size 32 Electoral equality 33 General analysis 33 Warding arrangements 34 Frome Berkley Down, Frome Fromefield, Frome Keyford, Frome Park and Frome Welshmill wards 35 Beacon, Beckington & Rode, Coleford, Creech, Mells, Nordinton, Postlebury and Stratton wards 36 Shepton East and Shepton West wards 40 Ashwick & Ston Easton, Avalon, Chilcompton, Knowle, Moor, Nedge, Pylcombe, Rodney & Priddy, St Cuthbert 41 (Out) North & West and Vale wards Wells Central, Wells St Cuthbert’s and Wells St Thomas’ wards 44 Glastonbury St Benedict’s, Glastonbury St Edmund’s, Glastonbury St John’s and Glastonbury St Mary’s wards 45 Street North, Street South and Street West wards 45 Conclusions 47 Parish electoral arrangements 47 6 What happens next? 51 7 Mapping 53 3 Appendices A Glossary & abbreviations 55 B Code of practice on written consultation 59 4 What is the Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Conventions of the UK Parliament
    House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Conventions Conventions of the UK Parliament Report of Session 2005–06 Volume I HL Paper 265-I HC 1212-I House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Conventions Conventions of the UK Parliament First Report of Session 2005-06 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Lords and the House of Commons to be printed 31 October 2006 HL Paper 265-I HC 1212-I Published on 3 November 2006 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Joint Committee on Conventions The Joint Committee was appointed with the following terms of reference: That, accepting the primacy of the House of Commons, it is expedient that a Joint Committee of the Lords and Commons be appointed to consider the practicality of codifying the key conventions on the relationship between the two Houses of Parliament which affect the consideration of legislation, in particular: (A) the Salisbury-Addison convention that the Lords does not vote against measures included in the governing party's Manifesto; (B) conventions on secondary legislation; (C) the convention that Government business in the Lords should be considered in reasonable time; (D) conventions governing the exchange of amendments to legislation between the two Houses; That the committee have leave to report from time to time; That the committee have power to appoint specialist advisers; That the committee have power to adjourn from place to place within the United Kingdom; That the committee do report by 21 July 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers in the 2010 Coalition Government
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06544, 15 October 2017 Ministers in the 2010 Compiled by Coalition Government Sarah Priddy This list notes ministerial office holders in the 2010 Coalition Government. Ministers’ dates of office Until the 2015 General Election, all Minsters carried on in their posts. After the Conservative party won a majority in the 2015 General Election, the Prime Minister announced senior government Cabinet appointments on 8 May 2015 at which point all Liberal Democrat Ministers ceased to be Ministers. Where a Conservative Minister continued to serve in the new Government, this is indicated in the end date column in the note: • Continued to hold the same office is indicated by ‘continued in post’ • Continued in Government but in another Department, is shown by ‘continued in Govt’ • Another role within the same government department is shown by ‘continued in Dept’ An end-date is given for all Ministers who left the Government where known. Further information The Commons briefing paper on limitations on the number of Ministers and the size of the payroll vote sets out the statutory limits that apply to ministerial appointments. Further information on Ministers is available on the Ministers’ topic page on the Parliament website which contains links to briefings produced by the House of Commons Library, the House of Lords Library and Select Committee reports. Sources Members Names Information Service; DODS People; Hansard and Number 10 press notices and the Government List of Ministerial Responsibilities. Feedback Please send any comments or corrections to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution Onitoring Rogramme 2006-08
    EVOLUTION ONITORING ROGRAMME 2006-08 Devolution and the Centre Monitoring Report January 2009 Robert Hazell The Constitution Unit www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit ISSN 1751-3898 The Devolution Monitoring Programme From 1999 to 2005 the Constitution Unit at University College London managed a major research project monitoring devolution across the UK through a network of research teams. 103 reports were produced during this project, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L 219 252 016) and the Leverhulme Nations and Regions Programme. Now, with further funding from the Economic and social research council and support from several government departments, the monitoring programme is continuing for a further three years from 2006 until the end of 2008. Three times per year, the research network produces detailed reports covering developments in devolution in five areas: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Englsh Regions, and Devolution and the Centre. The overall monitoring project is managed by Professor Robert Hazell at The Constitution Unit, UCL and the team leaders are as follows: Scotland: Dr Paul Cairney University of Aberdeen Wales: Prof Richard Wyn Jones & Prof Roger Scully Institute of Welsh Politics, Aberystwyth University Northern Ireland: Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University, Belfast English Regions: Prof Alan Harding & Dr James Rees IPEG, University of Manchester The Centre: Prof Robert Hazell, The Constitution Unit, UCL The Constitution Unit and the rest of the research network is grateful to all the funders of the devolution monitoring programme. All devolution monitoring reports are published at: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution- unit/research/devolution/devo-monitoring-programme.html Devolution and the Centre Monitoring Report January 2009 Robert Hazell Devolution and the Centre Monitoring Report January 2009 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 5 1.
    [Show full text]