DOCSLIB.ORG

The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen A?To Matsu ("Chinese Taipei") to the World Trade Organization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen A?To Matsu ( NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE ACCESSION OF THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN A?TO MATSU ("CHINESE TAIPEI") TO THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION The Delegations of Chinese Taipei and the United States of America hereby notify that they have completed bilateral negotiations to establish terms of Chinese Taipei's accession to the Worid Trade Organization (WTO) in the context of commitments and concessions for Market Access for Goods and Services. Consequently, they join in presenting to the WTO Director Genera! one origniai copy of the agreed schedules of concessions contained in the attached Annex. For the Delegation of For the Delegation of Chinese Taipei Tne United States of America y Date: Date: General Agreement on Trade fc Ser-'ices Chinese Taipei's schedule under the General Agreement on Trade In Services (CATS) includes two exceptions from most-favorsd-nation (MFN) treatment relating tc acquisition of land and air freight forwarding services. Chinese Taipei has conditioned its commitments in these wo sectors on reciprocity. Chinese Taipei hereby confirms that the United States satisfies the reciprocity requirement that is the basis for Chinese Taipei's M?N exception concerning acquisition of rights and interests in land. Therefore, Chinese Taipei will permit U.S. natural and legal persons to acquire rights and interests in lar.d in Chinese Taipei as set forth in the list of MFN exceptions of its GATS schedule. Furthermore, Chinese Taipei hereby confirms that the United States satisfies the reciprocity requirement that is the basis for Chinese Taipei's MFN exception cenceroing limitations on the percentage of equity ±at a non-Chir.ese Taipei natural or juridical person can hold in an air freight forwarding enterprise incorporated in Chinese Taipei and on the number of non-Chinese Taipei directors of such an enterprise. Therefors. Chinese Taipei wjli not impose a Iirr.it on the percentage of equity that U.S. natural and juridical persons are permitted to hold in an air freight forwarding enterprise incorporated in Chinese Taipei cor will Chinese Taipei limit the number of non-Chinese Taipei directors cf such an enterprise. After its accession to the WTO, Chinese i aipci will r.ot apply tariffs above the rates applied in 1995 on an MrN basis, except for products that are subject to (1) a tariff quota, (2) temporary dury suspensions or reductions or are on the attached List cf Exceptions. Such products are, however, subject to the bound rates set forth ir. Chinese Taipei's marker access schedule. Since Chinese Taipei's formal market access schedule for goods will be in the Harmonized System 96 nomenclature and -hat nomenclature differs from the nomenclature in the attached market access schedule, Chinese Taipei wii! provide a concordance, in electronic form, uO the WTO Secretariat and any WTO member requesting one. This concordance will identify the changes for each tariff line associated wiih the conversion from the nomenclature ussd in the attached schedule co the Harmonized System 96 nomenclature. The conversion will be subject to verification tc ensure that the scope cf any concession, has not been altered. Members 'A-ill notify the Secretariat and Chinese Taipei cf any objections to the conversion and attempt to resolve them promptly. I .isl of Exceptions Tariff Kate of duty Initial Implementation Other duties iicm Description of products 3 negotiating period itnd number Accession Final right on the from/lo charges concession 1 2 (1) (2) 4 5 6 1)810W10 Lichees, hmgngans, fresh 20.00% 17.00% 2002 10061000 Rice in the husk (paddy or rough) ST-Anncx 5 10062000 I tusked (brown) rice ST-Anncx 5 10063000 St:mi-milletl or wholly milled rice, whether or not polished or ghr/.cd ST-Anncx 5 10064000 Hroken rice ST-Anncx 5 11023010 Ghitioims rice Hour ST-Annex 5 1107.3090 Olhcr rice Hint ST-Annex 5 110.11 '100 Grouts, mcnl vS rice ST-Anncx 5 1MM291K)A Pellets of rice ST-Anncx 5 < IMMI900A Rolled of flaked rice ST-Anncx 5 1 MM 29 90A Olhcr worked rice ST-Anncx 5 II081900A Kicc starch ST-Annex 5 19019(190 A Olhcr preparations of hcnding No. 19.01 coiUmning noi less than 30% of rice ST-Annex 5 •V90'H010 Kite threads ST-Anticx 5 I99K/H/M List of Exceptions Tariff Kate of duty Initial Implementation Other duties hem 3 Description of products negotiating period and number Accession Finul right on the from/to charges concession 1 __ 2 4 9041090A .Ucc puffed, or prepared by puffing or roasting ST-Annex 5 1904 h won hisiant rice threads Si-Annex 5 ]9<MI090C Other processed foods obtained by the swelling or roasting of rn:e ST-Annex 5 19049000A Rice prnducts. in grain form, precooked or otherwise prepared ST-Annex 5 21069099C Other food preparations containing not less than 30% of rice ST-Anncx 5 35051031A Ilice starch for fodtlcr use, ST-Anncx 5 35O51O32A Kicc starch, not for fodder use ST-Anncx 5 25231010 Clinker, cement, white 10.00% 10.00% X 23231090 Other cement clinkers 10.00% 10.00% X 25232100 White cement, whether or not artificially 10.00% 10.00% X coloured J523291O Portland cement, white or coloured 10.00% 10.00% X 25232990 Other porlland cement 10.00% 10.00% X 1998/8/14 I.is! of Kxceptions Tariff Rate of duty Initial Implementation Other duties item Description of products 3 negotiating period and mnnlier Accession i-'inal right on the froin/to charges concession 1 2 (0 (2) 4 5 6 252.UOOO Aluminous cement 10.00% 10.00% X 257.190,0 lydnuiiic cements, white or coloured 1 10.00% 10.00% X 2523100C, Other hydraulic cements 10.00% 10.00% X 29051910A Mulylene glycol 2.50% 2.50% X 29095090A Potassium jjuaiacol sul Connie (3-1 lydroxy-4- 9.10% 5.50% 2001 mcthoxybenzene sul Ionic acid monopotnssiurn salt) ;><>.1V.4990A Mffnmmic acid (N-2,3-xylylanthranilic acid); 9.00% 0.00% 2004 (2-| {2.3-Diinelhylphenyl)ainino] -hen/oic acid) 29224990H Diclofcnai: sodium (2-( (2,6-l)ichtorophenyl) 9.00% 0.00% »H iimino) bcnzenc-acctic acid inoiiosodimn salt) - 29U94999A (ilyccryl guaiacolate (3-(2-Mc(hoxyphenoxy)-l. 9.10% 5.50% 2001 2-|)iopauediol); Guaiauol |>lyc«ryl ether 2WM.WH (lUiiiCcucsin 9.00% 0.00% 2004 291O400OA Dl.-incthionine (2-Ainino-4-(mcthylthio)butyric 9.00% 0.00% 2004 acid) 2912I99OA Rniiitiiliuc IIC1 fN-f 2| [ | 5-f (5-[(Dimctliylainino) 9.00% 0.00% 2004 mclhyl]-2-rnr;myl| methyl] lhio| ethyl) 1998/8/14 I J\s\ of licentious Tariff Rate of duly Initial Implementation Other duties iicm Description of products 3 negotiating period and number Accession Final right on the from/to charges concession 1 1 (1) ! 5 6 ^'-methyl-2-niti o-1,1 -elheitcciininiim) 2933U990A ^icmiietnlc citrate (3-Pyrklinecarboxylic acid 9.00% 0.00% 1 2002 ?.-(cHcyhyl-amino) ethyl eslcr cilrale) 2933.199013 Clopcrastine 11CI (1-| 2-\ (4-Clilornpliuny 1) 9.00% 0.00% 2004 >iw:iiylTnclli-oxyJ clliytj pipeiidine ivdrochtoridci) 29109090 A l:lui]iequiiie(9-Fliii)io-6,7-dihy(tro-5-incthy!-l 9.00% 0.00% 2002 -oxo-1 HjSH-benzo [ij] quino!izinc-2-curboxylic ncitl) •;.9:M9()9OA ■nuoctuini<k:(l,^-l.)itlii<>l:un:-3-pcnrnnoic iiniKiu) 9.30% 6.50% 2001 29.U909UH Mcsulphcn (2,(j-Dinicthyl thianlliicnc & p- 9.00% 0.00% 2002 dilohicnc(lisuiridc) 29349090C Cl)Eorttie/ittume(2-('UChlnrophcnyl)tatrnliy<lnj-3- 9.00% 0.00% • 2004 uicthyMI 1-1,3-lhinzin-'l-one 1,1-dioxide) IMxtxicnm (■1-lIy(l!'oxy-2-tnethyl-N-2-|jyri»liayl- 9.00% 0.00% 2004 21 t-l ,2-bcnzolhia7.ine-3- cjirhoxamitie 1,! - tlioxkle 293490901: Oxnzolmti (lO-Chloro-2,3,7,1 lb-tetraliydro-2- 9.00% 0.00% 2004 meUiyi-1 Ib-phcnyloxazolc [3,2-d] \\,A] ben/xkI inzopin- fi(SM)-onc) 1998*8/ Ust »fl:.xccption5 Tariff Kale of duly Initial IniplcTiiculntion Other duties ilnii Description of products 3 negotiating period oi kI number Accession Final rifiht on tbc from/to charges concussion I A 5 6 293*190901* ; (5-Chloro-2(3I l)-l)c»7.oxaz(ilonc); 9.00% 0.00% 200'l (5-Uiloro-2(3!l)-bcnzoloiic); (5-Cliloro-2l I-droxy bcnzuxnzonc) 7-Ainiiiodcacct(ixyccr»lospormiic acid (7-ADC'A) 9.30% 6.50% 2001 293490»>0M 7-l*hunyliiL-ctniiiinodc»cctoxyccphalospnriinic ncicl 9.30% 6.50% 2001 (CI-l'A C) 29362990A Nicotinic Acid (3-1'yridiiiu carboxylic acid) or 9.00% 0.00% 2004 Niacin 29362990B Nicotinamidc (3-Pyridine carhoxiimidu) 9.00% 0.00% 2004 293930OOA Calkiuc Anhy(:t(nis(3,7-Diliydrt»-1,3,7- 9.00% 0.00% 2004 trimcChyl-11 i-p-.it mc-2,f>-dionc) 29393000 L* Caficinc Monof)ytlra(c(3p7-Dih>'(lro-1,3,7- 9.00% 0.00% 2004 trmiclhyl-111-piirinc-2,6-dione nuinoliydratc) 2939'IUOOA Pliciiylprnpanolninino MCI ((t)-Norcp!iec!rinc 9.00% 0.00% 2001 hydi(ichloride) 29395000A Thoupliyllint: sodium glyeiimlu 9.00% 0.00% 200-1 29395(J0OH Oyphyllinc(7-(2,3-['JihytIroxypropyl)-3,7- 9.00% 0.00% 2004 tf iliydro-1,3-diumtliyl-111-purine-2,6-dkint;) 1998/8/14 T)cc l,ist ofllxeqrtions Taiiif Rate of duly Initial Implementation Other duties item Description of products 3 negotiating period and number Accession I'inal on (he right froin/lo charges concession 1 (1).. 4 5 rhw)phyllinc(3.7-l )ihydro-1,3-dimcthyl-1II- 9.00% 0.00% 200<1 Ik'tberinc tannalc (7,8,13,13a-lclra(Iehydro-9, 9.00% 0.00% 2004 10-ilimcllmxy-2>(methylcnedioxy)betbinium II 1)00 A Ucti/.yl-pcnicillinc 0 sulfiixidi: (( 1s- 9.00% 0.00% 200<l {2a ,5 rr ,<i/7J)| -3,.l-di-methyl-7-oxi)-6-| (phenyl.-icetyl)amino)-4-tliia-]-!!zabicyclo- (3.'.'..0| hcptanc-2-cnr boxy lie acid sulfoxidc) 2041JOOOM Aminof'l- ■\inoxicil!in Tri'iydiali: (f1-( | 9.00% 0.00% 200-1 hy(itoxyphciiyl;:ici:(y| | amino| -3,3-diini:lhyl-7 -<ixo-4-thia-l -a/abicyclo j.1.2.0) hephime^- cnrboxylic acitl) Z'MIIWOC Ampicillin Tribydrate (6-[ (Amino]ihenylacelyl) 9.00% 0.00% 2004 amitio]-3,3-dimelhyl-7-oxo-4-iliiii-l-n7.abicyclo |.1.2.0| he|Hane-2-c:irboxylic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taiwan and China's Cross-Strait Relations" (2018)
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-18-2018 Contending Identities: Taiwan and China's Cross- Strait Relations Jing Feng [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Recommended Citation Feng, Jing, "Contending Identities: Taiwan and China's Cross-Strait Relations" (2018). Master's Projects and Capstones. 777. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/777 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Contending Identities: Taiwan and ​ China’s Cross-Strait Relationship Jing Feng Capstone Project APS 650 Professor Brian Komei Dempster May 15, 2018 2 Abstract Taiwan’s strategic geopolitical position—along with domestic political developments—have put the country in turmoil ever since the post-Chinese civil war. In particular, its antagonistic, cross-strait relationship with China has led to various negative consequences and cast a spotlight on the country on the international diplomatic front for close to over six decades. After the end of the Cold War, the democratization of Taiwan altered her political identity and released a nation-building process that was seemingly irreversible. Taiwan’s nation-building efforts have moved the nation further away from reunification with China.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations: What Are the Legitimate Expectations from the WTO Qingjiang Kong
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Journal of International Law 2005 Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations: What Are the Legitimate Expectations from the WTO Qingjiang Kong Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kong, Qingjiang, "Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations: What Are the Legitimate Expectations from the WTO" (2005). Minnesota Journal of International Law. 220. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil/220 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Journal of International Law collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations: What are the Legitimate Expectations from the WTO? Qingjiang Kong* INTRODUCTION On December 11, 2001, China acceded to the World Trade Organization (WTO).1 Taiwan followed on January 1, 2002 as the "Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu."2 Accession of both China and Taiwan to the world trading body has triggered a fever of activities by Taiwanese businesses, but the governments on both sides of the Taiwan Strait have been slow to make policy adjustments. The coexis- tence of business enthusiasm and governmental indifference * Professor of International Economic Law, Zhejiang Gongshang University (previ- ously: Hangzhou University of Commerce), China. His recent book is China and the World Trade Organization:A Legal Perspective (New Jersey, London, Singapore, Hong Kong, World Scientific Publishing, 2002). Questions or comments may be e- mailed to Professor Kong at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Scoring One for the Other Team
    FIVE TURTLES IN A FLASK: FOR TAIWAN’S OUTER ISLANDS, AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE HOLDS A CERTAIN FATE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ASIAN STUDIES MAY 2018 By Edward W. Green, Jr. Thesis Committee: Eric Harwit, Chairperson Shana J. Brown Cathryn H. Clayton Keywords: Taiwan independence, offshore islands, strait crisis, military intervention TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................ ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................... iii I. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 II. Scope and Organization ........................................................................................... 6 III. Dramatis Personae: The Five Islands ...................................................................... 9 III.1. Itu Aba ..................................................................................................... 11 III.2. Matsu ........................................................................................................ 14 III.3. The Pescadores ......................................................................................... 16 III.4. Pratas .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Checklist of Inland-Water and Mangrove Fish Fauna of Kinmen Island, Fujian Province, Taiwan with Comments on Ecological Conservation of Native Fishes
    316 Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 21, Suppl., pp. 316-319 (2013) DOI: 10.6119/JMST-013-1226-1 THE CHECKLIST OF INLAND-WATER AND MANGROVE FISH FAUNA OF KINMEN ISLAND, FUJIAN PROVINCE, TAIWAN WITH COMMENTS ON ECOLOGICAL CONSERVATION OF NATIVE FISHES I-Shiung Chen1, Chia-Jun Weng2, Yi-Ru Chen2, Shih-Pin Huang1, Zong-Han Wen1, Nian-Hong Jang-Liaw1, and Tsung-Hsien Tsai1 Key words: fish fauna, new record, endangered species, fish con- I. INTRODUCTION servation. The Kinmen island is located in the river mouth opening of Julongjiang River basin of Fujian Province, the territory be- ABSTRACT longing to Taiwan, ROC. In the earlier stage of 1960, the fauna of inlandwater fishes has been formally reported by The ecological status of the lowland freshwater and brack- Cheng TR [5] and he firstly mentioned about the occurrence of ish fish fauna traditionally got better protected since long time Rasborinus takakii (Oshima) [7] which found from Kinmen for military protect region without great human and agricul- waters. However, Rasborinus takakii (Oshima) has been re- ture impact in last few decades. However, many human garded as a junior synonym of Metzia mesembrinum (Jordan & reconstruction of river habitats, pollution and overuse of irri- Evermann) [6]. gation from river water have become great impact for fish In this island, the ecological status of the lowland fresh- survival in Kinmen. So far, there are totally 27 families, 57 water and brackish fish fauna traditionally got better protected genera and 68 species have been collected and recorded by our since long time for military protect region without great hu- intensive survey for those freshwater habitats in inlandwater man and agriculture impact in last few decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinmen County Tourist Map(.Pdf)
    Kinmen Northeaest Port Channel Houyu Island Xishan Islet (Hou Islet) Mashan Observation Station Fongsueijiao Index Mashan Broadcast Station Mashan Mr. Tianmo Guijiaowei Houyupo Scenic Spots\Historic Spots Caoyu Island Three Widows Chastity Arch Kuige (Kuixing Tower) West Reef Mr. Caoyu Victory Memorial of August 23 Artillery Battle Maoshan Pagoda Guanaojiao Reef Jhenwutou August 23 Artillery Battle Daoying Pagoda Kinmen Temple Dongge Museum M Guanao Victory Memorial of August 23 Liaoluo Seashore Park Kinmen County Tourist Map CM M Artillery Battle Fanggang Fishing Port Shaqing Rd. Yunei Reef Bada Tower Pubian Chou/Zhou Residence Qingyu The 11-Generations Ancestral Siyuanyu Island Haiyin Temple Longfong Temple Mashan-Yongshih Fort Shrine Tangtou Sun Yat-sen Memorial Forest Chaste Maiden Temple Famous monasteries and temples Airport Market / Supermarkets Decorated archway Military bunker / Ancient arch Legend Topography Administrative Division Chiang Kai-Shek Memorial Lieyu North Wind God• Mr. Wulong Shumei E.S. Dongge Bay Forest Wind Chicken Rocky Coast Provincial Government Park Port / Lighthouse Gas Station / Bus Station Monument Bird-watching area Wuhushan Hiking Trail Scholar Wu’s Abode, Lieyu Martyr Garden Main road Air Line County / City Hall Cinema / Stadium Chunghwa Telecom Bus stop Cemetery Flower District Xiyuan Beach Guanghua Rd. Sec. 2 Tomb of Wang Shijie Victory Gate, Leiyu College/University Junior/ TAIWAN STRAIT Township Office Broadcast / TV station Tour bus stop Checkpoints Maple District Xiyuan Rd. Generally path Dike Senior High School The 6-Generations and Mr. Sanshih 10-Generations Ancestral Shrines Lieyu Township Cultural Hall Suspension bridge Shishan Beach Police Agency Elementary School Auto repair center display Public toilets Travel leisure Ranch / Farm Xiyuan Jingshan Temple Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • CSR90 the United States, China, and Taiwan
    Council Special Report No. 90 February 2021 The United States, Cover photo: A red pin indicates Taiwan on a map of East Asia. (hyotographics/Shutterstock) China, and Taiwan: Council on Foreign Relations cfr.org A Strategy to Prevent War 58 East 68th Street 1777 F Street, NW New York, NY 10065 Washington, DC 20006 tel 212.434.9400 tel 202.509.8400 Robert D. Blackwill and Philip Zelikow Council Special Report No. 90 February 2021 The United States, China, and Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War Robert D. Blackwill and Philip Zelikow The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with Council members to discuss and debate major international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Kennedy and Quemoy Quentin Spannagel Qu
    ______________________________________________________________________________ Candidate Kennedy and Quemoy Quentin Spannagel Quentin Spannagel, from Villa Grove, IL, wrote “Candidate Kennedy and Quemoy’ during his junior year for Dr. Edmund Wehrle's Graduate Seminar in Diplomatic History in spring 2015. He graduated with a BA in History Summa Cum Laude with Departmental Honors in May 2016. ______________________________________________________________________________ Running for president in 1960, John F. Kennedy promised to explore a “New Frontier.” -- a hybrid of challenges and opportunities that promised progress in both domestic and foreign affairs.58 In essence, Kennedy advocated for a new America not chained down by the traditional approaches of the Republican administration before him. In many way, Kennedy achieved what he desired: a new, more open-minded way of approaching international issues. Though Kennedy struggled to develop a new diplomatic approach to China, he did show a willingness to compromise with the Chinese in regards to the islands of Quemoy and Matsu.59 Kennedy remained a “cold warrior” throughout his presidency but he did begin to cautiously portray himself to the communist Chinese as more open to negotiation than the Eisenhower administration. This is best reflected in Kennedy’s stance on the islands of Quemoy and Matsu during the 1960 presidential debate. The crisis between the Republic of China (ROC)60 and the communist People’s Republic of China (PRC) was one of the great political tinderboxes for American foreign policy in the 1950s and 1960s. In 1949, during the administration of President Harry S. Truman, Mao Zedong conquered mainland China, defeating the nationalist government of Jiang Jieshi.61 The Nationalists fled to the heavily fortified island of Formosa, but Jiang’s forces managed to hold the offshore islands of Quemoy and Matsu in the Battle of Guningtou (October 1949).
    [Show full text]
  • FROM a MILITARY FRONT to a COLD WAR HERITAGE SITE a Study of the Prospect of Matsu Archipelago As Sustainable Tourism Islands Ch
    Theme 3 Session 2 FROM A MILITARY FRONT TO A COLD WAR HERITAGE SITE A study of the prospect of Matsu Archipelago as sustainable tourism islands Chao-Ching Fu Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan [email protected] Abstract. The Matsu archipelago, located in the northwest of Taiwan Strait and composed of 36 islands, is geographically closed to the Chinese Mainland and had been functioned as the military front by the Nationalist Government in Taiwan against Chinese Communism since 1949. The role of the islands as a stronghold along the Pacific Ocean against Communism during the Cold War was reassured by the U.S. Government. For decades, the islands were not easily accessible for the ordinary people from Taiwan for the purpose of tourism. The function of the military front was lifted on the midnight of 13th May, 1994 and a new role is envisioned for both domestic and foreign tourists. In fact, Matsu had never received the attack of the war although it was treated as the military front. All military facilities were set up for the purpose of defense and had become a part of people’s life. When more and more military forces are withdrawn from the islands, the decreasing population and drop in business with the military led the island search for a new drive for the local economy. Since then, tourism has been treated as the most prospective direction for the development. World highest density military facilities such as the underground tunnels have formed a special cultural landscape and contained unique attractions for cultural tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • “Quemoy” Or “Kinmen”?: a Translation Strategy for Communication
    Intercultural Communication Studies XVIII: 2 2009 Wei “Quemoy” or “Kinmen”?: A Translation Strategy for Communication Jian-Feng Wei, National Kinmen Institute of Technology The word Quemoy has existed for about 400 years. It is a widely accepted name and most often used and recognized in the West for an island in the Taiwan Strait. However, the government of the Republic of China (Taiwan) has adopted and used a different romanized spelling, Kinmen (written with the Chinese characters 金門) to signify this outlying island for about six decades. Both Quemoy and Kinmen represent in actuality the small island, causing much confusion in symbolic exchanges or outside communication about the island. This paper discusses the significance of the island’s English name when the islanders try to communicate with other countries or other cultures in the modern context and analyzes the island’s translation strategy within the international society. On August 23, 1958, Quemoy and Matsu drew international headlines when Chinese shells rained down in the “Quemoy Incident.” Moreover, Quemoy and Matsu became a major election issue during the 1960 U.S. presidential debates between the candidates, John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. Quemoy, or Kinmen, is a small island of about 150 square kilometers situated on the far west side of the Taiwan Strait, about 200 kilometers (125 miles) west of Taiwan, and much closer to the southeast coast of mainland China than Taiwan. The shortest distance from the main island of Quemoy to Communist-held territory is only 2310 meters. Although the island is geographically very near the Chinese mainland, politically it belongs to the Republic of China (Taiwan).
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Kennedy and Quemoy Quentin Spannagel Eastern Illinois University
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep 2016 Awards for Excellence in Student Research 2016 Awards for Excellence in Student Research and Creative Activity - Documents and Creative Activity Spring 2016 Candidate Kennedy and Quemoy Quentin Spannagel Eastern Illinois University Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/lib_awards_2016_docs Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Spannagel, Quentin, "Candidate Kennedy and Quemoy" (2016). 2016 Awards for Excellence in Student Research and Creative Activity - Documents. 4. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/lib_awards_2016_docs/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the 2016 Awards for Excellence in Student Research and Creative Activity at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2016 Awards for Excellence in Student Research and Creative Activity - Documents by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quentin Spannagel Candidate Kennedy and Quemoy Running for president in 1960, John F. Kennedy vowed to explore a “New Frontier” — a hybrid of challenges and opportunities that promised progress both domestically and abroad.1 In essence, Kennedy envisioned a New America not chained down by the traditions of the Republican administration before him. In many regards, Kennedy achieved what he desired: a fresh, open-minded way of approaching international issues. Though Kennedy struggled to develop a new diplomatic approach to China, he did show a willingness to compromise with the Chinese in regards to the islands of Quemoy and Matsu. Kennedy remained a “cold war warrior” throughout his presidency, but he did begin to cautiously portray himself to the communist Chinese as open to negotiation and more forward-thinking than the Eisenhower administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Archives - Shanghai in the Form…
    3/4/2011 Digital Archives - Shanghai in the form… News | Program Information | stone weir Profile | Inquiry System | References | Discussion Corner | team | Copyright Notices Stone Shanghai Penghu County Home > Stone Shanghai Overview > Township City Village Profile Overview Magong City Husi Township "Shi Hu" is the cultural characteristics of coral reefs is one shelf fisheries, foreign countries, Baisha Township Taiwan has, but the highest density of Penghu. Penghu Islands, shed nearly a hundred islands and Siyu Township reefs in the south-east of Taiwan Strait about 60 km, 40 km wide area, the low tide area of Wangan Township 164 square kilometers, the total volume than the high tide of 37 square kilometers 127 square Chimei Township kilometers long earnings. 320 km-long winding coastline, intertidal broad shallow shelf, slope small tidal range and large, basalt and [Stone and old] [old stone] stone and other stone and easy to obtain. Particularly the shortage of local plant resources, networking almost impossible to ship from local materials. In contrast, due to generous use of natural geographical conditions, the ocean to play the livelihood of many years accumulated experience and wisdom of the marine industry, dove set of human, made in Shanghai on the sea fishing fields, the risk is small, has a catch for years, hard-pressed protein source , would be a more secure method. Juan Peng whether the first port stone weir was built in when and where, because of age- old has been untraceable. Shanghai records on stone, first appeared in 1720 in Taiwan County: Penghu large complex tax levy Shanghai two small Shanghai-twenty, and later had not been crescent academic studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Interdependence and the Development of Cross-‐Strait
    Lu 1 Economic Interdependence and the Development of Cross-Strait Relations To what degree can economic interdependence encourage peace in the inherently conflictual relationship between China and Taiwan? Undergraduate Honors Thesis, Sanford School of Public Policy Duke University, Durham, NC Michelle Lu December 2011 Professor Jentleson Professor Kelley 2 Lu Abstract By measuring the extent to which improved economic relations between China and Taiwan has led to improved political relations, this proJect uses the case of cross-Strait relations to test the idea that economic interdependence encourages peace. Trade ties and indicators of political relations measure the extent to which economic interdependence can encourage peace and work toward conflict resolution in an inherently conflictual relationship. Economic interdependence expands contacts between states, encourages the building of cooperative institutions, and introduces new incentives for peace over conflict. This paper argues that economic interdependence is not sufficient to resolve political conflict, but it builds an environment conducive to improved political relations and easing of tensions. These improvements are not high-level, political, diplomatic ties but rather the building of lower level political and societal exchange. Trade relations have grown between China and Taiwan from 2003 and 2011, and this economic interdependence is correlated with expanded interaction in tourism, transportation, political dialogue and cultural exchange. These effects allow for greater mutual understanding and contact, which create a reciprocal effect by contributing to increased economic interaction. While progress in cross-Strait relations is constrained by the internal politics of both China and Taiwan at any moment, the United States plays an important role in reinforcing the positive effects of economic interdependence.
    [Show full text]