A New Era in the Right to Sign He Houhanga Rongo Te Tika Ki Te Reo Turi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A New Era in the Right to Sign He Houhanga Rongo Te Tika Ki Te Reo Turi A New Era in the Right to Sign He Houhanga Rongo te Tika Ki Te Reo Turi Report of the New Zealand Sign Language Inquiry September 2013 Human Rights Commission InfoLine 0800 496 877 (toll free) Fax 09 377 3593 (attn: InfoLine) Email [email protected] www.hrc.co.nz Language Line and NZ Sign Language interpreter available If you have a hearing or speech impairment, you can contact the Commission using the New Zealand Relay Service. NZ Relay is a telecommunications service and all calls are confidential. www.nzrelay.co.nz Tämaki Makaurau – Auckland Level 3 Zurich House, 21 Queen Street PO Box 6751, Wellesley Street, Tämaki Makaurau/Auckland 1141 Waea/telephone 09 309 0874 Waea whakaahua/fax 09 377 3593 Te Whanganui ä Tara – Wellington Level 1 Vector Building, 44-52 The Terrace PO Box 12411, Thorndon, Te Whanganui ä Tara/Wellington 6144 Waea/telephone 04 473 9981 Waea whakaahua/fax 04 471 6759 Ötautahi – Christchurch Level 2 Moeraki Suite, Plan B Building 9 Baigent Way, Middleton PO Box 1578, Ötautahi/Christchurch 8140 Waea/telephone 03 379 2015 Waea whakaahua/fax 03 353 0959 A New Era in the Right to Sign He Houhanga Rongo te Tika Ki Te Reo Turi Report of the New Zealand Sign Language Inquiry September 2013 ISBN 978-0-478-35652-6 (print) 978-0-478-35653-3 (online) Auckland, September 2013 Cover image: John Casey, Silver Image Photography, courtesy of HANDMADE PRODUCTIONS AOTEAROA. Contents Foreword 5 Acknowledgements 7 Executive summary 8 Recommendations 14 1 Background information 17 2 Education 30 3 The rights of deaf people to access communication, information and services through NZSL 50 4 Promoting and maintaining NZSL as an official language of New Zealand 74 Appendix 1 Terms of reference for the NZ Sign Language Inquiry 90 Appendix 2 NZSL interpreter support available through the Ministry of Health’s contract with Deaf Aotearoa NZ 91 Appendix 3 List of abbreviations 92 Endnotes 94 3 © Royce Flynn, Flynn Express Photo Restoration and Enhancement. 4 Foreword Deaf people, and sign language, deserve equality in New Zealand. In 2006 New Zealand passed an Act to enshrine this belief ... today, we have the potential and capacity to achieve the dream, and change futures for Deaf people now and for future generations. All we need now is for decision-makers to listen, and develop the will to act. – Sonia Pivac E ng ¯a mana, e ng¯a reo, rau rangatira m¯a, and audible applause. The rights of disabled t ¯en¯a koutou. Tihei Matariki. people, including the language and cultural rights of deaf people became international Ka p ¯o, ka ao, ka awatea. law in May 2008 when the Disability Convention came into force. This was a new To you all as leaders with wisdom and era in disability rights, the sign of a new diverse languages, greetings. dawn for disabled people around the world. Matariki emerges from the darkness and A few years later earthquakes devastated breathes again, the sign of a new dawn. the Canterbury region. Many of the usual ways of communicating and informing When the New Zealand Sign Language people of what was happening were not (NZSL) Act was passed by Parliament, the available. Some of the early television gallery of deaf people erupted, raising broadcasts included NZSL interpreters. and waving their hands in applause. For many New Zealanders this was seeing NZSL became an official language of something new – realising that NZSL is a New Zealand alongside English and te whole and vibrant language. The use of reo M ¯aori. It was a new era in the right to NZSL interpreters recognised the diversity sign, the sign of a new dawn for deaf New of people and communication needs within Zealanders. our communities. It was a first sign of hope emerging amid the devastation – the sign of Later that year, the United Nations adopted a new dawn for all New Zealanders. the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Disability Convention). However, leading up to the initial post- Again, this was met with a mix of visible quake response on TV, the situation behind 5 the scenes was very different. Deaf early childhood education; when all deaf, people and their allies had to fight to get hearing impaired, and speech impaired interpreters and to receive vital information children learn to sign; and when every about civil defence, clean drinking water, citizen can sign the national anthem. In sanitation, and health and safety issues. these ways the unique contribution of articulate deaf people is valued not only in Before and during this Inquiry, we heard their own community but across all parts of many stories of the denial of people’s rights New Zealand society. And at bedtime, once to communicate using NZSL, and children the hearing aids and cochlear implants have and families being discouraged to learn been taken off, any mother or father can their language. Battles like these must not say “Goodnight, I love you” in NZSL to their happen in future. small deaf child. This Inquiry also found many encouraging Our call to action is to make this real, and signs. New Zealand has a strong deaf to implement the recommendations of this community with high expectations. Inquiry. To ensure that, from now on, at Frequent gatherings are held where the dawn of every child’s life there will be culture is strengthened and history passed the opportunity to learn our latest official on. There are groups beyond the deaf language, NZSL. Taking these steps together community for which NZSL can prove life will mark a new era in the right to sign. changing. There are new technologies to assist people in remote locations, an interested public who want to learn basic NZSL and increasing use of te reo M ¯aori. Government departments have Paul Gibson shown a new willingness to engage with Disability Rights Commissioner NZSL aspirations and goals, and Ministers Kaihaut ¯u Tika Hau ¯atanga understand links between language and culture and are ready to act. There is recognition that all disabled people’s rights in the Disability Convention must be made real. I look forward to a time when NZSL is constantly visible in our streets, schools, hospitals, and on TV. Imagine a time when every child learns the basics of NZSL in 6 Acknowledgements The Human Rights Commission would like to thank everybody who has worked on, contributed to, and responded to this Inquiry report and its early drafts. The Commission particularly acknowledges the deaf community who have “had to constantly retell their stories and restate their rights”. The Inquiry team was helped by Dr Rachel McKee and Victoria University’s Deaf Studies Research Unit, whose research and guidance were significant to the Inquiry. Thank you to the Commission’s staff, especially Victoria Manning. Her unique capability as an NZSL user and expert, policy analyst, and deaf community member and leader made the Inquiry both possible and credible. The Commission would also like to acknowledge Deaf Aotearoa and Handmade Productions Aotearoa for allowing us to use their images in this report. 7 Executive summary Background This Inquiry has considered the human rights implications of the barriers that In 2006, after many years of lobbying by deaf people continue to face. Its areas of the deaf community, the New Zealand Sign focus were closely informed by priorities Language Act was passed, making New identified in the Disability Convention Zealand Sign Language (NZSL) an official and through previous consultations language of New Zealand. However, the with the deaf community. The Inquiry Human Rights Commission continues to also recognises that NZSL is important receive enquiries and complaints from deaf for hearing people with communication people about discrimination they experience difficulties, and for family/wh ¯anau, friends trying to access or use NZSL. and others communicating with a NZSL user. Therefore the Inquiry’s three priority The Commission began this NZSL Inquiry areas have been: because of concerns about the barriers 1 the right to education for deaf people deaf people continue to experience when and other NZSL users using their own language. Barriers restrict their quality of life and full enjoyment of 2 the right to freedom of expression and fundamental human rights. opinion including the right to receive and impart information using NZSL In 2008, New Zealand ratified the United interpreter services Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Disability Convention). 3 the promotion and maintenance of This Convention recognises sign languages NZSL as an official language of New as equal to spoken languages. It requires Zealand. governments to progressively strengthen the status of sign language in different fields New Zealand has a responsibility to of a person’s life. These steps are necessary promote and protect its official languages. to respect, protect and promote the right NZSL and te reo M ¯aori are each vital to to dignity, equality, freedom of expression the expression of culture and identity. and independence for deaf people and other There is a strong practical need for NZSL’s NZSL users. official status as deaf people have limited 8 A New Era in the Right to Sign or no access to New Zealand’s two spoken support for families is not enough. It makes official languages, English and te reo it too difficult to create a natural learning M ¯aori. In addition, there is a deep historic environment for children to acquire NZSL justification for the official status of te reo, skills as a foundational language. based on the rights affirmed in the Treaty of Waitangi. There is much to be learnt from previous reports and good practice examples.
Recommended publications
  • Sign Language Typology Series
    SIGN LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY SERIES The Sign Language Typology Series is dedicated to the comparative study of sign languages around the world. Individual or collective works that systematically explore typological variation across sign languages are the focus of this series, with particular emphasis on undocumented, underdescribed and endangered sign languages. The scope of the series primarily includes cross-linguistic studies of grammatical domains across a larger or smaller sample of sign languages, but also encompasses the study of individual sign languages from a typological perspective and comparison between signed and spoken languages in terms of language modality, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to sign language typology. Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages Edited by Ulrike Zeshan Sign Language Typology Series No. 1 / Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages / Ulrike Zeshan (ed.) / Nijmegen: Ishara Press 2006. ISBN-10: 90-8656-001-6 ISBN-13: 978-90-8656-001-1 © Ishara Press Stichting DEF Wundtlaan 1 6525XD Nijmegen The Netherlands Fax: +31-24-3521213 email: [email protected] http://ishara.def-intl.org Cover design: Sibaji Panda Printed in the Netherlands First published 2006 Catalogue copy of this book available at Depot van Nederlandse Publicaties, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag (www.kb.nl/depot) To the deaf pioneers in developing countries who have inspired all my work Contents Preface........................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Language Endangerment and Linguistic Diversity Ben Braithwaite
    RESEARCH REPORT Sign language endangerment and linguistic diversity Ben Braithwaite University of the West Indies at St. Augustine It has become increasingly clear that current threats to global linguistic diversity are not re - stricted to the loss of spoken languages. Signed languages are vulnerable to familiar patterns of language shift and the global spread of a few influential languages. But the ecologies of signed languages are also affected by genetics, social attitudes toward deafness, educational and public health policies, and a widespread modality chauvinism that views spoken languages as inherently superior or more desirable. This research report reviews what is known about sign language vi - tality and endangerment globally, and considers the responses from communities, governments, and linguists. It is striking how little attention has been paid to sign language vitality, endangerment, and re - vitalization, even as research on signed languages has occupied an increasingly prominent posi - tion in linguistic theory. It is time for linguists from a broader range of backgrounds to consider the causes, consequences, and appropriate responses to current threats to sign language diversity. In doing so, we must articulate more clearly the value of this diversity to the field of linguistics and the responsibilities the field has toward preserving it.* Keywords : language endangerment, language vitality, language documentation, signed languages 1. Introduction. Concerns about sign language endangerment are not new. Almost immediately after the invention of film, the US National Association of the Deaf began producing films to capture American Sign Language (ASL), motivated by a fear within the deaf community that their language was endangered (Schuchman 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Language Choice and Identity: an Investigation Based on the Comparison of Language Attitudes from Two Different Localities
    Available online at www.jlls.org JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC STUDIES ISSN: 1305-578X Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 1032-1042; 2020 Language choice and identity: An investigation based on the comparison of language attitudes from two different localities Filiz Çetintaş Yıldırıma 1 a Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey APA Citation: Çetintaş Yıldırım, F. (2020). The Language Choice and Identity: An Investigation Based on the Comparison of Language Attitudes from Two Different Localities. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 1032-1042.Doi: 10.17263/jlls.759361 Submission Date:14/02/2020 Acceptance Date:18/03/2020 Abstract This current research tries to compare and contrast the language attitudes of Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Mersin and Hatay cities located in the East Mediterranean Region of Anatolia. The quantitative results of the language attitude surveys conducted in the two cities by two different researchers (Çetintaş Yıldırım, 2019; Kocaoğlu, 2019) are compared, and qualitative conclusions which can be generalized to the population of Arabic-Turkish bilinguals are obtained. Two different but related themes (language choices and the sense of belonging to a social/cultural identity of the two participant groups) consist of the main focus. Four sets of questions for the identity theme and seven sets of questions for the language choice theme were determined from the surveys and the means of each group for every question were compared and interpreted. The comparison reveals that Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Hatay interiorize Arabic language more than Arabic-Turkish bilinguals from Mersin. The first group is more inclined to use Arabic in their professional career and transfer it to the new generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Clause Constructions in Turkish Sign Language Dissertation
    Relative Clause Constructions in Turkish Sign Language Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades des Doktors der Philosophie Fachbereiche Sprache, Literatur, Medien I & II der Universität Hamburg vorgelegt von OKAN KUBUS aus Ankara Hamburg, Juni 2016 Hauptgutachter: Prof. Dr. Christian Rathmann Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Annette Hohenberger Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30.01.2015 Angenommen von der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften der Universität Hamburg am 11.03.2015 Veröffentlicht mit Genehmigung der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften der Universität Hamburg am 23.05.2016 ii Türk Sağır topluluğuna To the Turkish Deaf community iii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the relative clause constructions (RCCs) in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). TİD, a recognized natural language, has rich, distinctive linguistic properties, as do other sign and spoken languages. For the analysis of various relativization strategies and discourse functions of RCCs in TİD, the collected data is based on TİD monologues in a small corpus (consisting of approximately three film hours), which has been annotated with special attention to RCC types in various discourse modes (narrative, information, report and description), with a high incidence of narrative passages. The distributions of head noun position, the positions of relative and matrix clauses, the accompanying nonmanual elements, and the relative elements indicated three strategies: (i) head noun exhibited within the scope of nonmanual, (ii) distinctive nonmanual scopes of head noun and modifying clause, and (iii) non-overt head nouns (free RCs). The data reveal that restrictive RCCs strongly favor circumnominal-like constructions, which are generally accompanied by squint, whereas nonrestrictive RCCs in TİD use a variety of strategies. Even though the way that relative clauses in TİD are marked also show a great distribution, the two strategies that were observed the most frequently are (i) no overt relative marker and (ii) clause-final IX (nominalizer).
    [Show full text]
  • Negation in Kata Kolok Grammaticalization Throughout Three Generations of Signers
    UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Graduate School for Humanities Negation in Kata Kolok Grammaticalization throughout three generations of signers Master’s Thesis Hannah Lutzenberger Student number: 10852875 Supervised by: Dr. Roland Pfau Dr. Vadim Kimmelman Dr. Connie de Vos Amsterdam 2017 Abstract (250 words) Although all natural languages have ways of expressing negation, the linguistic realization is subject to typological variation (Dahl 2010; Payne 1985). Signed languages combine manual signs and non-manual elements. This leads to an intriguing dichotomy: While non-manual marker(s) alone are sufficient for negating a proposition in some signed languages (non- manual dominant system), the use of a negative manual sign is required in others (manual dominant system) (Zeshan 2004, 2006). Kata Kolok (KK), a young signing variety used in a Balinese village with a high incidence of congenital deafness (de Vos 2012; Winata et al. 1995), had previously been classified as an extreme example of the latter type: the manual sign NEG functions as the main negator and a negative headshake remains largely unused (Marsaja 2008). Adopting a corpus-based approach, the present study reevaluates this claim. The analysis of intergenerational data of six deaf native KK signers from the KK Corpus (de Vos 2016) reveals that the classification of KK negation is not as straightforward as formerly suggested. Although KK signers make extensive use of NEG, a negative headshake is widespread as well. Furthermore, signers from different generations show disparate tendencies in the use of specific markers. Specifically, the involvement of the manual negator slightly increases over time, and the headshake begins to spread within the youngest generation of signers.
    [Show full text]
  • Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation Through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Linguistics ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2009 Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology Erin Wilkinson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds Recommended Citation Wilkinson, Erin. "Typology of Signed Languages: Differentiation through Kinship Terminology." (2009). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ling_etds/40 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistics ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TYPOLOGY OF SIGNED LANGUAGES: DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH KINSHIP TERMINOLOGY BY ERIN LAINE WILKINSON B.A., Language Studies, Wellesley College, 1999 M.A., Linguistics, Gallaudet University, 2001 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Linguistics The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico August, 2009 ©2009, Erin Laine Wilkinson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii DEDICATION To my mother iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to Barbara Pennacchi for kick starting me on my dissertation by giving me a room at her house, cooking me dinner, and making Italian coffee in Rome during November 2007. Your endless support, patience, and thoughtful discussions are gratefully taken into my heart, and I truly appreciate what you have done for me. I heartily acknowledge Dr. William Croft, my advisor, for continuing to encourage me through the long number of months writing and rewriting these chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Download, Modify and Append It As They See fit
    UC Berkeley Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society Title The Cross-linguistic Distribution of Sign Language Parameters Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1kz4f6q7 Journal Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 41(41) ISSN 2377-1666 Author Tatman, Rachael Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.20354/B4414110002 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY February 7-8, 2015 General Session Special Session Fieldwork Methodology Editors Anna E. Jurgensen Hannah Sande Spencer Lamoureux Kenny Baclawski Alison Zerbe Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley, CA, USA Berkeley Linguistics Society University of California, Berkeley Department of Linguistics 1203 Dwinelle Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 USA All papers copyright c 2015 by the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0363-2946 LCCN: 76-640143 Contents Acknowledgments . v Foreword . vii The No Blur Principle Effects as an Emergent Property of Language Systems Farrell Ackerman, Robert Malouf . 1 Intensification and sociolinguistic variation: a corpus study Andrea Beltrama . 15 Tagalog Sluicing Revisited Lena Borise . 31 Phonological Opacity in Pendau: a Local Constraint Conjunction Analysis Yan Chen . 49 Proximal Demonstratives in Predicate NPs Ryan B . Doran, Gregory Ward . 61 Syntax of generic null objects revisited Vera Dvořák . 71 Non-canonical Noun Incorporation in Bzhedug Adyghe Ksenia Ershova . 99 Perceptual distribution of merging phonemes Valerie Freeman . 121 Second Position and “Floating” Clitics in Wakhi Zuzanna Fuchs . 133 Some causative alternations in K’iche’, and a unified syntactic derivation John Gluckman . 155 The ‘Whole’ Story of Partitive Quantification Kristen A .
    [Show full text]
  • Verb Agreement in Brazilian Sign Language: Morphophonology, Syntax & Semantics
    Guilherme Lourenço Verb agreement in Brazilian Sign Language: Morphophonology, Syntax & Semantics Belo Horizonte Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 2018 Guilherme Lourenço Verb agreement in Brazilian Sign Language: Morphophonology, Syntax & Semantics Doctoral dissertation submitted to the Post- Graduate Program in Linguistic Studies (Poslin) at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, as a requisite to obtain the title of Doctor in Linguistics. Area: Theoretical and Descriptive Linguistics Research line: Studies on Formal Syntax Adviser: Dr. Fábio Bonfim Duarte Co-adviser: Dr. Ronnie B. Wilbur Belo Horizonte Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 2018 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pelos Bibliotecários da Biblioteca FALE/UFMG Lourenço, Guilherme. L892v Verb agreement in Brazilian Sign Language [manuscrito] : Morphophonology, Syntax & Semantics / Guilherme Lourenço. – 2018. 320 f., enc. Orientador: Fábio Bonfim Duarte. Coorientador: Ronnie B. Wilbur Área de concentração: Linguística Teórica e Descritiva. Linha de Pesquisa: Estudos em Sintaxe Formal. Tese (doutorado) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Letras. Bibliografia: f. 266-286. Apêndices: f. 287-320. 1. Língua brasileira de sinais – Sintaxe – Teses. 2. Língua brasileira de sinais – Concordância – Teses. 3. Língua brasileira de sinais – Gramática – Teses. 4. Língua brasileira de sinais – Verbos – Teses. I. Duarte, Fábio Bonfim. II. Wilbur, Ronnie B. III. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Letras. IV. Título. CDD: 419 VERB AGREEMENT IN BRAZILIAN SIGN
    [Show full text]
  • The Kata Kolok Corpus: Documenting a Shared Sign Language
    accepted for Sign Language Studies, 16 (2), Winter 2016 Sampling shared sign languages Connie de Vos Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmgen, the Netherlands Abstract This paper addresses some of the theoretical questions, ethical considerations, and methodological decisions that underlie the creation of the Kata Kolok Corpus as well as the Kata Kolok Child Signing Corpus. This discussion is relevant to the formation of prospective sign corpora that aim to capture the various sociolinguistic landscapes in which sign languages, whether rural or urban, may emerge and evolve. Keywords: corpus construction, shared sign languages, linguistic fieldwork, first language acquisition, Kata Kolok 1. Introduction1 Whether stated or implied, the emergence of sign languages has often taken to be directly linked to the establishment of formal deaf education, and other cultural centres where deaf individuals may convene. Over the past ten years, more attention has been given to the emergence of signing varieties in rural and urban areas with a high incidence of deafness, where both deaf and hearing community members form social networks, using visual-gestural forms of communication (Nyst 2012). This latter sociolinguistic category of sign language, being used by both deaf and hearing community members, is known as a shared sign language. Shared signing communities vary in detail with respect to various social factors such as the causes and incidence of deafness, community size, the ratio of deaf and hearing signers, time depth, as well as the socio-cultural construction of deafness (Kisch 2008; Kusters 2010). The linguistic and anthropological documentation and description of shared signing communities are still in their initial stages (Zeshan & de Vos 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Cards (216)
    Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Deaf in Aruba Deaf in Antigua and Barbuda Population: 800 Population: 500 World Popl: 48,206,860 World Popl: 48,206,860 Total Countries: 216 Total Countries: 216 People Cluster: Deaf People Cluster: Deaf Main Language: Language unknown Main Language: Language unknown Main Religion: Christianity Main Religion: Christianity Status: Superficially reached Status: Superficially reached Evangelicals: Unknown % Evangelicals: Unknown % Chr Adherents: 92.9% Chr Adherents: 92.5% Scripture: Unspecified Scripture: Unspecified www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Deaf in UAE Deaf in Afghanistan Population: 20,000 Population: 398,000 World Popl: 48,206,860 World Popl: 48,206,860 Total Countries: 216 Total Countries: 216 People Cluster: Deaf People Cluster: Deaf Main Language: Language unknown Main Language: Afghan Sign Language Main Religion: Islam Main Religion: Islam Status: Minimally Reached Status: Unreached Evangelicals: Unknown % Evangelicals: Unknown % Chr Adherents: 8.55% Chr Adherents: 0.05% Scripture: Unspecified Scripture: Translation Needed www.joshuaproject.net www.joshuaproject.net "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 "Declare his glory among the nations." Psalm 96:3 Pray for the Nations Pray for the Nations Deaf in Algeria Deaf in Azerbaijan Population: 223,000 Population: 77,000 World Popl: 48,206,860 World Popl: 48,206,860 Total Countries:
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Real Time Hand Gesture Recognition to Improve the Accuracy of Indian Sign Language
    IJRECE VOL. 7 ISSUE 2 (APRIL- JUNE 2019) ISSN: 2393-9028 (PRINT) | ISSN: 2348-2281 (ONLINE) A SURVEY ON REAL TIME HAND GESTURE RECOGNITION TO IMPROVE THE ACCURACY OF INDIAN SIGN LANGUAGE. Pankaja Alappanavar, Avadhut Patade, Diksha Nagekar, Kiran More, Ume-Ruman Mulla (Dept. of Information Technology Engineering,) Sinhgad Academy of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India Abstract- Sign languages are natural languages that are Indian Sign Language (ISL) is on the way of used to communicate with deaf and dumb people. There standardization, this task is given to Ramakrishna Mission are many sign languages in the world. Main focus of the Coimbatore by Indian Government. Indian Sign Language is a system is on Indian Sign Language (ISL). Basically, the part of Sign Language which is mostly used by deaf and dumb system will concentrate on Hand Gestures. Hand gesture is people in India. Signs depend upon various regional a very important part of the body for exchanging ideas, languages. The problem arises when deaf and dumb people try messages and thoughts among deaf and dumb people. The to communicate using their language with the people who are proposed system will recognize the numbers 0 to 9 and unaware of their language [4]. So, it becomes necessary to alphabets from Indian Sign Language. It will initially develop an intermediate system which solves this issue by identify the gestures from Indian Sign language. The understanding various hand gestures. Researches in the field system processes the particular gesture to recognize the of sign language recognition and in the development of sign number with the help of classification using Support language translation technology was started in the 90’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Cardinal Numerals in Rural Sign Languages: Approaching Cross-Modal Typology
    Cardinal numerals in rural sign languages: Approaching cross-modal typology ULRIKE ZESHAN, CESAR ERNESTO ESCOBEDO DELGADO, HASAN DIKYUVA, SIBAJI PANDA, and CONNIE DE VOS Abstract This article presents data on cardinal numerals in three sign languages from small-scale communities with hereditary deafness. The unusual features found in these data considerably extend the known range of typological variety across sign languages. Some features, such as non-decimal numeral bases, are unat- tested in sign languages, but familiar from spoken languages, while others, such as subtractive sub-systems, are rare in sign and speech. We conclude that for a complete typological appraisal of a domain, an approach to cross-modal typology, which includes a typologically diverse range of sign languages in addition to spoken languages, is both instructive and feasible. Keywords: cardinal numerals, morphology, numeral bases, numerals, rural sign languages, sign languages 1. Introduction This article discusses primary data on cardinal numerals from three sign lan- guages in small-scale rural communities in Turkey, India, and Mexico. Re- search on such “rural sign languages” is a very recent undertaking, and here we aim to contribute toward what is known about the typology of signed and spoken languages. Sections 1.1 and 1.2 introduce the phenomenon of rural sign languages as compared to the better-documented sign languages of urban deaf communities, as well as presenting an overview of what we know about cardi- nal numerals in urban sign languages, as compared to spoken languages. Sec- tion 2 details the sociolinguistic setting of the target languages, followed by the data analysis in Sections 3 and 4.
    [Show full text]