Investigating the Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Animal Behaviour

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating the Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Animal Behaviour 1 Investigating the relationship between gut microbiota and animal behaviour Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Chloe Elizabeth Heys. June 2018 2 Abstract: Investigating the relationship between gut microbiota and animal behaviour Chloe Elizabeth Heys An individual’s gut microbiota is increasingly recognised as having a key role in many host behaviours. In insects, the environment largely determines the host gut microbiota, with the majority ingested through the diet. In this thesis, I examine a series of host-gut microbiota relationships within three species of Drosophila with varied ecologies. Initially, I analyse the current methods used to eliminate the gut microbiota in Drosophila melanogaster, key to studying host-microbiota relationships and providing a foundation for this thesis. I then use this information to assess the role of the gut microbiota as an honest signal in age-based mate choice in Drosophila pseduoobscura. Finally, I examine the role the gut microbiota plays in specialisation in Drosophila sechellia, through adaptation to its toxic host plant, Morinda citrifolia. To attribute a specific behaviour to the gut microbiota, it must first be removed. However, removal can have serious physiological side effects on the host organism, and the most effective and least detrimental method of doing this is widely debated. I analyse commonly used methods of removing the gut microbiota in Drosophila melanogaster and find the addition of low- dose streptomycin to the dietary media is more effective and has fewer physiological effects than other methods such as egg dechorionation or rearing on a sterile diet. Female Drosophila pseudoobscura are known to discriminate between males based on age. This may occur through the alteration of the cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile of males, which can alter due to a varied gut microbiota caused by a varied diet. I determine that the gut microbiota influences female preference for older males and is a key component of attractiveness to females. I examine the role of the gut microbiota in Drosophila sechellia, in adaptation to its toxic host plant, Morinda citrifolia, and characterise the gut microbiota of this Drosophilid species for the first time. Rearing flies on M. citrifolia, a standard laboratory diet, and an additional salak (Salacca zalacca) fruit that lacks the toxic compounds present in M. citrifolia, I find that flies reared on a laboratory diet have a significantly reduced weight. However, there is no impact on development time or subsequent mating behaviours when compared to individuals reared on the wild, M. citrifolia diet. Finally, by creating experimental evolution lines of D. melanogaster supplemented with D. sechellia gut microbiota, I disentangle the role of pH in shaping the gut microbiota from the co-evolution of the gut microbiota within D. sechellia. D. melanogaster are highly averse to the scent of octanoic acid, the main toxic constituent within M. citrifolia, whereas D. sechellia are highly attracted. After ten generations D. melanogaster show significantly less aversity to octanoic acid. I determine that Lactobacillus plantarum acts as a detoxifying agent by metabolising octanoic acid, therefore suggesting this 3 bacterium has been fundamental to the ecological transition and specialisation of D. sechellia. Taken together, the chapters of this thesis further uncover the role of host- microbiota interactions in important ecological and evolutionary processes within Drosophila, from elucidating a principle method in gut microbiota research, to underlying mate choice mechanisms and finally to dietary specialisation. 4 Acknowledgements It’s hard to know where to begin when writing this acknowledgement section. I’m very fortunate to have a lot of close friends and family in my life, so this section is at risk of rambling on like an Oscar’s acceptance speech no-one really wants to hear. I think my first and foremost thanks must go to Zen. Without a doubt, she has been the best supervisor I could have ever asked for. I had never thought about studying for a PhD before, until I was fortunate enough to be supervised by her during my Undergraduate honours project. Her passion and dedication for research inspired and enthused me to pursue my own research path, and she has been there every step of the way. She has read every piece of work I’ve ever written and offered endless support when things go wrong. She has even listened to my many chicken (and now turkey!) stories I’ve distracted her with over the years. We’ve been working together for a long time now and I’ll miss that very much. My honorary supervisor, Anne Lizé, also deserves a tremendous thank you. I’ve known Anne almost as long as I’ve known Zen, and she has provided support and essential feedback this entire journey, even from afar. Our skype sessions have been invaluable and I’m very proud of the work we have completed together. Thanks also to Al Darby for filling the gap in my knowledge regarding host-microbiota interactions. His contribution has greatly strengthened this thesis. Further thanks to Fran Blow who took time out of her own busy schedule to teach me everything she knows about microbiology! Thanks must also go to my internal assessors, Iain Young and Greg Hurst, whose constructive comments have helped shape this thesis enormously. Thank you to everyone at the University of Liverpool sports centre, where I have wiled away many, many hours over the past few years. Having a friendly place where I can go to switch off my brain for a while has helped retain my sanity. Special thanks in particular must go to Inigo, head coach of 5 our little boxing club, and the rest of the boxing crew. Thanks for allowing me to punch you! To all my friends who have supported me over the years, even the ones who have no idea what I am actually doing, thank you for listening to me tell you about fruit flies. In particular, Adam Fisher for providing stats advice even at very short notice, and Amy Eacock and Becky Jones, for letting me distract you from your own work and providing first-class dog sitting services. Amy, tin-foil ball will forever live on. Chapters four and five of this thesis would not have been possible without Matthew and Claire Heys. After my Morinda citrifolia suppliers up and moved nurseries, I found myself stranded part-way through experiments with no fruit to feed my Drosophila. After complaining to Matthew and Claire about this situation, Matthew contacted a work colleague in Malaysia and Claire a friend who was on holiday in Thailand. Between them I ended up with enough fruit to sustain my experiments and beyond! I cannot thank my parents enough for everything they have done for me. They have provided both emotional and financial support for the many years I’ve spent at University and beyond. The annual trip to Australia consisting of copious amounts of shopping with my Mum was always a much-needed break. My Dad has also read every piece of work I’ve submitted - his proof- reading skills are second to none! I’m excited to (hopefully) become the first Dr Heys in the family! Finally, I definitely would not have been able to complete this PhD without Patrick. I feel like I’ve been quite calm throughout this thesis-writing process, but I’m sure the opposite is true, so thanks for putting up with me without complaint! He has always encouraged and supported me. Thank you for making sure I always take time-out to stroll along the beach together with the dogs. I’ll conclude this section with the insightful words of my dear friend, Ellie Watts: “when faced with a difficult decision, one must always trust your gut.” 6 Table of contents 1.Chapter One: General Introduction........................................................10 1.1 The ecology and evolution of host-microbe interactions....................10 1.1.1 Microbiota and behaviour in insects..........................................13 1.2 The Drosophila microbiota................................................................15 1.3 The Drosophila gut............................................................................19 1.3.1 Drosophila gut structure............................................................19 1.3.2 Drosophila gut microbiota..........................................................22 1.4 Outline of this thesis.........................................................................25 2. Chapter Two: The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how-to guide for host-microbiota studies...................29 2.1. Abstract.............................................................................................29 2.2 Introduction.........................................................................................30 2.3 Materials and Methods.......................................................................33 2.3.1 Fly stocks...................................................................................33 2.3.2 Experimental treatments............................................................34 2.3.3 Physiological assays.................................................................35 2.3.4 Bacterial analysis.......................................................................38 2.3.5 Statistical analysis.....................................................................39 2.4 Results...............................................................................................40
Recommended publications
  • New Insights Into the Microbiota of Moth Pests
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review New Insights into the Microbiota of Moth Pests Valeria Mereghetti, Bessem Chouaia and Matteo Montagna * ID Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (V.M.); [email protected] (B.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-5031-6782 Received: 31 August 2017; Accepted: 14 November 2017; Published: 18 November 2017 Abstract: In recent years, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have helped to improve our understanding of the bacterial communities associated with insects, shedding light on their wide taxonomic and functional diversity. To date, little is known about the microbiota of lepidopterans, which includes some of the most damaging agricultural and forest pests worldwide. Studying their microbiota could help us better understand their ecology and offer insights into developing new pest control strategies. In this paper, we review the literature pertaining to the microbiota of lepidopterans with a focus on pests, and highlight potential recurrent patterns regarding microbiota structure and composition. Keywords: symbiosis; bacterial communities; crop pests; forest pests; Lepidoptera; next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies; diet; developmental stages 1. Introduction Insects represent the most successful taxa of eukaryotic life, being able to colonize almost all environments, including Antarctica, which is populated by some species of chironomids (e.g., Belgica antarctica, Eretmoptera murphyi, and Parochlus steinenii)[1,2]. Many insects are beneficial to plants, playing important roles in seed dispersal, pollination, and plant defense (by feeding upon herbivores, for example) [3]. On the other hand, there are also damaging insects that feed on crops, forest and ornamental plants, or stored products, and, for these reasons, are they considered pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Pests and Diseases
    Clivia assassins – pests and diseases Clivia is really quite a resistant little genus, with only a few serious pests and diseases that can be life threatening . Others, though not lethal, can seriously affect a plant’s appearance and growth . General hygienic culture conditions like good drainage, removal of infected plants and material and a spray programme can successfully prevent these pests and diseases from becoming a serious problem . Just a note of caution when working with toxic chemicals: Read the instructions of all chemicals before use! Make sure that chemicals can be mixed without detrimental effects to treated plants – if not stated as mixable, test it first on a few plants before you treat your whole collection . Plant pests Lily borer (Brithys crini, Brithys pancratii) Brithys species, also known as Amaryllis caterpillars, are serious pests amongst members of the Amaryllidaceae. They target Crinum, Cyrthanthus, Haemanthus, Nerine, Amaryllis and Clivia, to name a few. This destructive pest has three to four generations in nature annually and if a severe infestation occurs it can destroy plants within a few days. The caterpillar Breakfast! The yellow and brown-black banding is easily distinguishable with its yellow and black or brown pattern of the Brithys caterpillar makes it easy to recognise . Only a mushy pseudo stem remains banding pattern. Young larvae emerge from a cluster of after Mr Caterpillar’s visit . Growing clivias eggs, usually on the underside (abaxial side) of leaves, and then start to tunnel into the leaf. Once inside, the larvae eat the soft tissue between the outer two epidermal cell layers, tunnelling their way towards the base of the leaf.
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Bacterial Communities of Two Insect Species Feeding on Toxic Plants Are Dominated by Enterococcus Sp
    fmicb-07-01005 June 24, 2016 Time: 16:20 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 28 June 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01005 The Generalist Inside the Specialist: Gut Bacterial Communities of Two Insect Species Feeding on Toxic Plants Are Dominated by Enterococcus sp. Cristina Vilanova1,2, Joaquín Baixeras1, Amparo Latorre1,2,3* and Manuel Porcar1,2* 1 Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain, 2 Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), University of Valencia-CSIC, Valencia, Spain, 3 Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Genómica y Salud, Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública, Valencia, Spain Some specialist insects feed on plants rich in secondary compounds, which pose a major selective pressure on both the phytophagous and the gut microbiota. However, microbial communities of toxic plant feeders are still poorly characterized. Here, we Edited by: Mark Alexander Lever, show the bacterial communities of the gut of two specialized Lepidoptera, Hyles ETH Zürich, Switzerland euphorbiae and Brithys crini, which exclusively feed on latex-rich Euphorbia sp. and Reviewed by: alkaloid-rich Pancratium maritimum, respectively. A metagenomic analysis based on Virginia Helena Albarracín, CONICET, Argentina high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene revealed that the gut microbiota Jeremy Dodsworth, of both insects is dominated by the phylum Firmicutes, and especially by the common California State University, gut inhabitant Enterococcus sp. Staphylococcus sp. are also found in H. euphorbiae San Bernardino, USA though to a lesser extent. By scanning electron microscopy, we found a dense ring- *Correspondence: Manuel Porcar shaped bacterial biofilm in the hindgut of H. euphorbiae, and identified the most [email protected]; prominent bacterium in the biofilm as Enterococcus casseliflavus through molecular Amparo Latorre [email protected] techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Molecular Understanding of the Biosynthesis of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids in Support of Their Expanding Medical Use
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11713-11741; doi:10.3390/ijms140611713 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review Towards a Molecular Understanding of the Biosynthesis of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids in Support of Their Expanding Medical Use Adam M. Takos and Fred Rook * Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-3533-3343; Fax: +45-3533-3300. Received: 28 April 2013; in revised form: 26 May 2013 / Accepted: 27 May 2013 / Published: 31 May 2013 Abstract: The alkaloids characteristically produced by the subfamily Amaryllidoideae of the Amaryllidaceae, bulbous plant species that include well know genera such as Narcissus (daffodils) and Galanthus (snowdrops), are a source of new pharmaceutical compounds. Presently, only the Amaryllidaceae alkaloid galanthamine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used to treat symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease, is produced commercially as a drug from cultivated plants. However, several Amaryllidaceae alkaloids have shown great promise as anti-cancer drugs, but their further clinical development is restricted by their limited commercial availability. Amaryllidaceae species have a long history of cultivation and breeding as ornamental bulbs, and phytochemical research has focussed on the diversity in alkaloid content and composition. In contrast to the available pharmacological and phytochemical data, ecological, physiological and molecular aspects of the Amaryllidaceae and their alkaloids are much less explored and the identity of the alkaloid biosynthetic genes is presently unknown. An improved molecular understanding of Amaryllidaceae alkaloid biosynthesis would greatly benefit the rational design of breeding programs to produce cultivars optimised for the production of pharmaceutical compounds and enable biotechnology based approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • BRUNSVIGIA ORIENTALIS Candelabra flower, Koningskandelaar, Perdespookbossie Amaryllidaceae
    SNR FACT SHEET BRUNSVIGIA ORIENTALIS Candelabra flower, Koningskandelaar, Perdespookbossie Amaryllidaceae Late summer in Steenbok Park sees the emergence of the spectacular crimson Candelabra flower or Brunsvigia orientalis which grows in scattered colonies in coastal sand. The bud of this large bulb pushes up through the sand on its sturdy stem before a leaf can be seen, and produces up to 40 flowers in a head shaped like a rounded candelabra. As the flowers fade the ovaries enlarge and become papery and eventually the flower stem breaks away and the flower head is blown about, tumbling over the ground and scattering its seeds. These ‘balls’ blowing in the wind no doubt give rise to the Afrikaans name Perdespookbossie. The plant was initially called Amaryllis orientalis, but in 1753 Lorenz Heister, a botanist and professor of medicine at the University of Helmstädt, renamed it Brunsvigia in honour of his patron the Duke of Brunswick. Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand (1735-1806), a cultured and benevolent despot, promoted the study of plants. The bulb had been sent to Germany in 1748 by Cape Governor, Ryk Tulbagh, who was very interested in the flora and fauna of the Cape and regularly sent plants and stuffed animals to Europe. Brunsvigias are deciduous and have adapted to the dry period of the year by resting underground. The large flower heads appear shortly before the rainy season. Sunbirds searching for nectar in the tubular flowers are their chief pollinators. Once the seeds have been scattered they germinate very quickly, giving the seedling a full rainy season to develop sufficiently to withstand its first dry season underground.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Policy Review: Alternative Risk Management Measures to Import Lilium Spp
    International plant protection convention 14_EWGCutFlowers_2014_June Final policy review Lilium spp. Agenda Item: 4.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final policy review: Alternative risk management measures to import Lilium spp. cut flowers from Taiwan December 2013 International plant protection convention 14_EWGCutFlowers_2014_June Final policy review Lilium spp. Agenda Item: 4.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © Commonwealth of Australia Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, except for content supplied by third parties, photographic images, logos, and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en.
    [Show full text]
  • Variación Geográfica De La Microbiota En Cuatro Especies Del Género Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) En Colombia
    Variación geográfica de la microbiota en cuatro especies del género Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) en Colombia Nicolás Luna Niño Universidad del Rosario Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Bogotá, Colombia 2021 Variación geográfica de la microbiota en cuatro especies del género Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) en Colombia Nicolás Luna Niño Trabajo de grado presentado como requisito para obtener el título de: Biólogo Director Juan David Ramírez Ph.D Co-director Camilo Salazar Ph.D Facultad de Ciencias Naturales Programa de Biología Universidad del Rosario Bogotá, Colombia 2021 Variación geográfica de la microbiota en cuatro especies del género Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) en Colombia Nicolás Luna1, Giovanny Herrera1, Marina Muñoz1, Melissa Herrera2, Anya Brown3, Emily Khazan3, Camilo Salazar2, Juan David Ramírez1* 1Centro de Investigaciones en Microbiología y Biotecnología-UR (CIMBIUR), Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia. 2Grupo de Genética Evolutiva, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia. 3University of Florida, USA. *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Estudios en las mariposas del género de Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) han permitido entender los mecanismos que promueven la especiación y adaptación en el neotrópico. Análisis de la microbiota en estos insectos reportan variaciones interespecíficas e intraespecíficas, las cuales no están asociadas directamente a la depredación de polen. Además, se desconoce si los ecosistemas geográficos donde cohabitan mariposas con diferentes anillos miméticos afectan la microbiota de estos individuo. Este estudio utilizó amplicon-based sequencing del gen ARNr-16S en 66 muestras que corresponden a 4 especies de distintas regiones biogeográficas de Colombia: Heliconius clysonymus (n = 4), Heliconius erato (n = 24), Heliconius melpomene (n = 19) y Heliconius cydno (n = 19).
    [Show full text]
  • Pollinator Limitation in the Endangered Geophyte Brunsvigia Litoralis (Amaryllidaceae) in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa ⁎ S
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com South African Journal of Botany 78 (2012) 159–164 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb The cost of being specialized: Pollinator limitation in the endangered geophyte Brunsvigia litoralis (Amaryllidaceae) in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa ⁎ S. Geerts , A. Pauw Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa Received 27 May 2010; received in revised form 10 May 2011; accepted 20 June 2011 Abstract The impacts of habitat fragmentation and reduced population sizes on ecological processes deserve more attention. In this study we examine pollination in rural and urban populations of Brunsvigia litoralis (Amaryllidaceae), an endangered endemic and a flagship species for plant conservation in South Africa. B. litoralis has flowers conforming to the bird-pollination syndrome, but the only flower visitor at the urban sites, the Greater Double-collared Sunbird (Cinnyris afra) (1.6 visits/flower/hour), is unable to access the nectar in the usual way due to a long perianth tube (38.8 mm) and resorts to robbing. Supplemental hand pollination was used to test for pollen limitation of seed set at the urban sites flowers were pollen-supplemented. Seed set in supplemented plants increased by more than an order of magnitude relative to controls. The longer-billed Malachite Sunbird (Nectarinia famosa) was observed as the sole pollinator of B. litoralis at the rural site where seed set was significantly higher. Although B. litoralis plants are long lived, the absence of pollinators in these urban fragments might place populations at an extinction risk. © 2011 SAAB.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheromone Production, Male Abundance, Body Size, and the Evolution of Elaborate Antennae in Moths Matthew R
    Pheromone production, male abundance, body size, and the evolution of elaborate antennae in moths Matthew R. E. Symonds1,2, Tamara L. Johnson1 & Mark A. Elgar1 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia 2Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Keywords Abstract Antennal morphology, forewing length, Lepidoptera, phylogenetic generalized least The males of some species of moths possess elaborate feathery antennae. It is widely squares, sex pheromone. assumed that these striking morphological features have evolved through selection for males with greater sensitivity to the female sex pheromone, which is typically Correspondence released in minute quantities. Accordingly, females of species in which males have Matthew R. E. Symonds, School of Life and elaborate (i.e., pectinate, bipectinate, or quadripectinate) antennae should produce Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 the smallest quantities of pheromone. Alternatively, antennal morphology may Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Tel: +61 3 9251 7437; Fax: +61 3 be associated with the chemical properties of the pheromone components, with 9251 7626; E-mail: elaborate antennae being associated with pheromones that diffuse more quickly (i.e., [email protected] have lower molecular weights). Finally, antennal morphology may reflect population structure, with low population abundance selecting for higher sensitivity and hence Funded by a Discovery Project grant from the more elaborate antennae. We conducted a phylogenetic comparative analysis to test Australian Research Council (DP0987360). these explanations using pheromone chemical data and trapping data for 152 moth species. Elaborate antennae are associated with larger body size (longer forewing Received: 13 September 2011; Revised: 23 length), which suggests a biological cost that smaller moth species cannot bear.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume-20-No-1-2011
    ISSN 1819-1460 & QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER OF THE CLIVIA SOCIETY& VOLUME 20 NUMBER 1 & JANUARY - MARCH 2011 CLIVIA NEWS & VOLUME 20 NUMBER 1 & JANUARY - MARCH 2011 Table of Contents & CLIVIA NEWS Inner Front Cover & EDITORIAL The Clivia Society www.cliviasociety.org Roger Fisher 2 & CLIVIA TWELVE 3 The Clivia Society caters for Clivia enthusiasts throughout the world. It is the umbrella body for a & CLIVIA 13 3 number of constituent Clivia Clubs and interest Groups which meet regularly in South Africa and & CLIVIA SOCIETY MATTERS elsewhere around the world. In addition, the Society has individual members in many countries, Notice of an Annual General Meeting of the Clivia Society o be held on Saturday 21 May 2011 at the Assagay Hotel, Shongweni, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 4 some of which also have their own Clivia Clubs. An annual Yearbook and quarterly News letters The Clivia Society Annual General Meeting and Gardenii Show 5 are published by the Society. For information on becoming a member and / or for details of & READER'S VIEWS Clivia Clubs and Interest Groups contact the Clivia Society secretary or where appropriate, the When is 'Clivia' not a Clivia? 5 - Solanum tuberosum L. cv. 'Clivia' - Greig Russell 5 International Contacts, at the addresses listed in the inside back cover. & CLIVIA NATURE NOTES Another Clivia-chomping worm in prison garb - Greig Russell 6 & HABITAT CLIVIA The objectives of the Clivia Society Umtamvuna Gorge Clivia - Mick Dower 10 & GROWERS' NOTES 1. To coordinate the interests, activities and objectives of constituent Clivia Clubs and Wicking - Maria Mancini 10 asso ciate members; & BREEDERS' NOTES 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Historial Cientifico Genomica Y Salud 20200127
    RESEARCH GROUP BACKGROUND AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2015-2020 JOINT RESEARCH UNIT ON GENOMICS AND HEALTH Centre for Public Health Research (CSISP)/Cavanilles Institute for Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia. FUNDACIÓN PARA EL FOMENTO DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN SANITARIA Y BIOMÉDICA DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA. C/ Micer Mascó nº 31. 46010 Valencia. CIF.: G98073760 Inscrita Rgtro.fundaciones: 501 V - www.fisabio.es CURRENT MEMBERS OF THE RESEARCH TEAM Research fellows, lecturers, senior research fellows and professors Dra. M. Pilar Francino. Senior Research Fellow. Head of Department. Prof. Andrés Moya Simarro. Professor of Genetics. Prof. Fernando González Candelas. Professor of Genetics. Prof. Amparo Latorre Castillo. Professor of Genetics. Dr. F. Xavier López Labrador. FIS (ISCIII) Senior Research Fellow. Dr. Alex Mira. Senior Research Fellow. Dra. María Alma Bracho Lapiedra. “Miguel Servet” FIS (ISCIII) Research Fellow. Dr. Giuseppe D’Auria. “Miguel Servet” FIS (ISCIII) Research Fellow. Dra. María José Gosalbes Soler.CIBERESP Research Fellow. Part time Lecturer of Genetics. University of Valencia. Dr Carles Úbeda. "Ramón y Cajal" Research Fellow. Dr Iñaki Comas Espadas. Marie-Curie Research Fellow. Research assistants and associates Dr. Vicente Pérez-Brocal. FIS "Sara Borrell"(ISCIII) Research Associate. Dra. M.ª Desamparados Ferrer García. Scientific Officer. Dra. Victoria Furió Gomar González. Dra. Arantxa López López Scientific officers Dra. Nuria Jiménez Hernández. Research Officer. Pascual Asensi. IT Systems Administrator.
    [Show full text]