Gut Bacterial Communities of Two Insect Species Feeding on Toxic Plants Are Dominated by Enterococcus Sp

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gut Bacterial Communities of Two Insect Species Feeding on Toxic Plants Are Dominated by Enterococcus Sp fmicb-07-01005 June 24, 2016 Time: 16:20 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 28 June 2016 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01005 The Generalist Inside the Specialist: Gut Bacterial Communities of Two Insect Species Feeding on Toxic Plants Are Dominated by Enterococcus sp. Cristina Vilanova1,2, Joaquín Baixeras1, Amparo Latorre1,2,3* and Manuel Porcar1,2* 1 Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain, 2 Institute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), University of Valencia-CSIC, Valencia, Spain, 3 Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Genómica y Salud, Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública, Valencia, Spain Some specialist insects feed on plants rich in secondary compounds, which pose a major selective pressure on both the phytophagous and the gut microbiota. However, microbial communities of toxic plant feeders are still poorly characterized. Here, we Edited by: Mark Alexander Lever, show the bacterial communities of the gut of two specialized Lepidoptera, Hyles ETH Zürich, Switzerland euphorbiae and Brithys crini, which exclusively feed on latex-rich Euphorbia sp. and Reviewed by: alkaloid-rich Pancratium maritimum, respectively. A metagenomic analysis based on Virginia Helena Albarracín, CONICET, Argentina high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene revealed that the gut microbiota Jeremy Dodsworth, of both insects is dominated by the phylum Firmicutes, and especially by the common California State University, gut inhabitant Enterococcus sp. Staphylococcus sp. are also found in H. euphorbiae San Bernardino, USA though to a lesser extent. By scanning electron microscopy, we found a dense ring- *Correspondence: Manuel Porcar shaped bacterial biofilm in the hindgut of H. euphorbiae, and identified the most [email protected]; prominent bacterium in the biofilm as Enterococcus casseliflavus through molecular Amparo Latorre [email protected] techniques. Interestingly, this species has previously been reported to contribute to the immobilization of latex-like molecules in the larvae of Spodoptera litura, a highly Specialty section: polyphagous lepidopteran. The E. casseliflavus strain was isolated from the gut and its This article was submitted to Extreme Microbiology, ability to tolerate natural latex was tested under laboratory conditions. This fact, along a section of the journal with the identification of less frequent bacterial species able to degrade alkaloids and/or Frontiers in Microbiology latex, suggest a putative role of bacterial communities in the tolerance of specialized Received: 01 April 2016 Accepted: 13 June 2016 insects to their toxic diet. Published: 28 June 2016 Keywords: : lepidoptera, gut communities, metagenomics, Enterococcus sp., secondary metabolites Citation: Vilanova C, Baixeras J, Latorre A and Porcar M (2016) The Generalist INTRODUCTION Inside the Specialist: Gut Bacterial Communities of Two Insect Species Plants have biochemical and molecular mechanisms to defend themselves from insects attack. Feeding on Toxic Plants Are Dominated by Enterococcus sp. Among those, plants produce a vast range of secondary metabolites with anti-herbivore effects, Front. Microbiol. 7:1005. which are produced either constitutively or in response to tissue damage (War et al., 2012). Some doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01005 plant biochemicals are toxic, repellent, or antinutritive for herbivores. Among these compounds, Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org 1 June 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 1005 fmicb-07-01005 June 24, 2016 Time: 16:20 # 2 Vilanova et al. The Generalist Inside the Specialist alkaloids, terpenoids, and complex mixtures of macromolecules littoralis (Tang et al., 2012), or Ostrinia nubilalis (Belda et al., such as latex are among the most frequent plant biochemical 2011). defense barriers. Latex- and alkaloid-rich plants constitute a particularly strong Plant alkaloids, are toxic to a wide range of insects (Nuringtyas selection pressure not only for phytophagous insects (Kirk et al., et al., 2014). However, a few species of insects are unaffected 2012; Ramos et al., 2015), but also for their gut microbiota, which by even high concentrations of alkaloids. The Amaryllidaceae, is subjected to a constant flow of toxic compounds. The gut of with more than 300 alkaloids isolated to date (Bastida et al., insects feeding on toxic plants is thus a unique and extreme 2011), are among the most deterrent plants. Alkaloids present habitat. We present here a complete characterization of the in Pancratium maritimum have demonstrated both cytotoxic and bacterial gut symbionts of two monophagous Lepidoptera feeding antimicrobial activity (Hetta and Shafei, 2013). The aposematic on plants rich in, among other toxic compounds, a cocktail of larvae of the noctuid moth Brithys crini –the “lily borer”– alkaloids or terpenes (Figure 1). This is the first report of the are well known to feed monophagously on the sand lily microbial larval gut communities associated to such toxic diets. Pancratium maritimum. Sequestration of alkaloids by this species has never been tested but the larvae of the closely related species complex Xanthopastis timais – the “Spanish moth”, another MATERIALS AND METHODS Amaryllidaceae specialist – was early included by Rothschild (1973) in her seminal work on insect chemical defense and is Sampling a typical example of sequestration of phenanthridine alkaloids Larvae of B. crini and H. euphorbiae (Figure 1) were obtained (Nishida, 2002). Terpenes are chemical compounds that are in the field (coastal dunes from Pinedo and El Saler, Valencia, present in large amounts in a large variety of plants: in conifers, Spain) by direct inspection of the food plants P. maritimum and for example, they are the main components of resin. Plant Euphorbia sp., respectively, in the adequate moment of the year: terpenes are involved in defense against herbivory, even at spring for most larvae of B. crini and autumn for H. euphorbiae. the belowground level (Vaughan et al., 2013). Terpenes, along with alkaloids, natural gum and many other compounds, are Gut Dissection and DNA Extraction also present in Euphorbiaceae and other plants exuding latex. Last instar larvae from B. crini and H. euphorbiae were kept Unsurprisingly, latex-producing plants are particularly resistant in starvation for one day to promote the elimination of plant to many insects and other pests (Hagel et al., 2008). The larvae of material from the gut. Larvae were immobilized by placing the sphingid moth Hyles euphorbiae – the “spurge hawk moth” – them on ice and both the midgut and hindgut were dissected feed on a broad variety of Euphorbia plants from which they under sterile conditions. Guts from three different individuals sequester the cytotoxic ingenane diterpene esters (Marsh and of each species were independently disaggregated and manually Rothschild, 1984). homogenized in PBS buffer (NaCl 8 g/L, KCl 0.2 g/L, Na HPO Beyond biochemicals, plant defenses against herbivory also 2 4 1.44 g/L, and KH PO 0.24 g/L, pH adjusted to 7.4) with an involve mutualistic microorganisms. Endophytic fungi, plant 2 4 Eppendorf-adapted pestle. Total DNA was obtained from the symbionts living asymptomatically within the host tissues, homogenate with a standard purification protocol consisting of produce alkaloid-based herbivore deterrents that contribute to alkaline lysis followed by precipitation with potassium acetate the defense of the plant (Koh and Hik, 2007). Reciprocally, and isopropanol (Latorre et al., 1986). An initial incubation step bacteria associated with insects can play a role in disturbing with 2 mg/mL lysozyme at 37◦C for 30 min was performed plant defensive barriers (Hansen and Moran, 2014; Hammer and to ensure the lysis of Gram-positive bacteria. The quality of Bowers, 2015). For example, Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa the DNA was finally checked on a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel decemlineata) larvae have been reported to bear bacteria in their and quantified with Nanodrop-1000 Spectophotometer (Thermo oral secretions that suppress antiherbivore defenses in tomato Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). (Solanum lycopersicum), the plant the beetle feeds on (Chung et al., 2013). In summary, plant–insect interactions are complex ecological processes mediated by secondary metabolites, alkaloids PCR Amplification and 16S rRNA and terpenes among them, but also by microorganisms, which Profiling play key roles as both defense and attack allies for the plants A 700 bp fragment of the V1–V3 hypervariable region of the and phytophagous insects, respectively. Surprisingly enough, 16S rRNA genes was polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified though, there are few reports on that topic. The few studies from all the samples with universal primers 28F (50-GAG TTT available on the microbial communities associated to the gut of GAT CNT GGC TCA G-30) and 519R (50-GTN TTA CNG CGG insects, and particularly to Lepidoptera, are focused on species CKG CTG-30). A short (9–11 nucleotides) barcode sequence considered as agricultural or forest pests worldwide. This is followed by a four-nucleotide spacer (CGAT) was included at the case of the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar (Broderick et al., the 50 end of the oligonucleotides used as forward primers to 2004; Mason and Raffa, 2014), the diamondback moth Plutella enable assignment of sequences to samples after high-throughput xylostella (Lin et al., 2015), or the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa sequencing. All the amplifications were performed under the armigera (Xiang et al., 2006). Also,
Recommended publications
  • New Insights Into the Microbiota of Moth Pests
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review New Insights into the Microbiota of Moth Pests Valeria Mereghetti, Bessem Chouaia and Matteo Montagna * ID Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (V.M.); [email protected] (B.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-5031-6782 Received: 31 August 2017; Accepted: 14 November 2017; Published: 18 November 2017 Abstract: In recent years, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have helped to improve our understanding of the bacterial communities associated with insects, shedding light on their wide taxonomic and functional diversity. To date, little is known about the microbiota of lepidopterans, which includes some of the most damaging agricultural and forest pests worldwide. Studying their microbiota could help us better understand their ecology and offer insights into developing new pest control strategies. In this paper, we review the literature pertaining to the microbiota of lepidopterans with a focus on pests, and highlight potential recurrent patterns regarding microbiota structure and composition. Keywords: symbiosis; bacterial communities; crop pests; forest pests; Lepidoptera; next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies; diet; developmental stages 1. Introduction Insects represent the most successful taxa of eukaryotic life, being able to colonize almost all environments, including Antarctica, which is populated by some species of chironomids (e.g., Belgica antarctica, Eretmoptera murphyi, and Parochlus steinenii)[1,2]. Many insects are beneficial to plants, playing important roles in seed dispersal, pollination, and plant defense (by feeding upon herbivores, for example) [3]. On the other hand, there are also damaging insects that feed on crops, forest and ornamental plants, or stored products, and, for these reasons, are they considered pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Pests and Diseases
    Clivia assassins – pests and diseases Clivia is really quite a resistant little genus, with only a few serious pests and diseases that can be life threatening . Others, though not lethal, can seriously affect a plant’s appearance and growth . General hygienic culture conditions like good drainage, removal of infected plants and material and a spray programme can successfully prevent these pests and diseases from becoming a serious problem . Just a note of caution when working with toxic chemicals: Read the instructions of all chemicals before use! Make sure that chemicals can be mixed without detrimental effects to treated plants – if not stated as mixable, test it first on a few plants before you treat your whole collection . Plant pests Lily borer (Brithys crini, Brithys pancratii) Brithys species, also known as Amaryllis caterpillars, are serious pests amongst members of the Amaryllidaceae. They target Crinum, Cyrthanthus, Haemanthus, Nerine, Amaryllis and Clivia, to name a few. This destructive pest has three to four generations in nature annually and if a severe infestation occurs it can destroy plants within a few days. The caterpillar Breakfast! The yellow and brown-black banding is easily distinguishable with its yellow and black or brown pattern of the Brithys caterpillar makes it easy to recognise . Only a mushy pseudo stem remains banding pattern. Young larvae emerge from a cluster of after Mr Caterpillar’s visit . Growing clivias eggs, usually on the underside (abaxial side) of leaves, and then start to tunnel into the leaf. Once inside, the larvae eat the soft tissue between the outer two epidermal cell layers, tunnelling their way towards the base of the leaf.
    [Show full text]
  • Meta-Omics Tools in the World of Insect-Microorganism Interactions
    biology Review Meta-Omics Tools in the World of Insect-Microorganism Interactions Antonino Malacrinò Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, 58183 Linköping, Sweden; [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 25 October 2018; Accepted: 22 November 2018; Published: 27 November 2018 Abstract: Microorganisms are able to influence several aspects of insects’ life, and this statement is gaining increasing strength, as research demonstrates it daily. At the same time, new sequencing technologies are now available at a lower cost per base, and bioinformatic procedures are becoming more user-friendly. This is triggering a huge effort in studying the microbial diversity associated to insects, and especially to economically important insect pests. The importance of the microbiome has been widely acknowledged for a wide range of animals, and also for insects this topic is gaining considerable importance. In addition to bacterial-associates, the insect-associated fungal communities are also gaining attention, especially those including plant pathogens. The use of meta-omics tools is not restricted to the description of the microbial world, but it can be also used in bio-surveillance, food safety assessment, or even to bring novelties to the industry. This mini-review aims to give a wide overview of how meta-omics tools are fostering advances in research on insect-microorganism interactions. Keywords: metagenomics; metatranscriptomics; metaproteomics; microbiome; insect pests 1. Introduction It is widely acknowledged that microorganisms are the main drivers of several fundamental physical, chemical and biological phenomena [1]. As scientific techniques and instruments evolve, the role of microorganisms in shaping the lifestyle of other organisms becomes clearer.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversiteitsopname Biodiversity Assessment
    Biodiversiteitsopname Biodiversity Assessment Bome - Trees (77 sp) Veldblomme - Flowering veld plants (65 sp) Grasse - Grasses (41 sp) Naaldekokers - Dragonflies (46 sp) Skoenlappers - Butterflies (81 sp) Motte - Moths (95 sp) Nog insekte - Other insects (102 sp) Spinnekoppe - Spiders (53 sp) Paddas - Frogs (14 sp) Reptiele - Reptiles (22 sp) Voëls - Birds (185 sp) Soogdiere - Mammals (23 sp) 4de uitgawe: Jan 2015 Plante/Plants Diere/Animals (24 000 spp in SA) Anthropoda Chordata (>150 000 spp in SA) Arachnida Insecta (spinnekoppe/spiders, 2020 spp in SA) Neuroptera – mayflies, lacewings, ant-lions (385 spp in SA) Odonata – dragonflies (164 spp in SA) Blattodea – cockroaches (240 spp in SA) Mantodea – mantids (185 spp in SA) Isoptera – termites (200 spp in SA) Orthoptera – grasshoppers, stick insects (900 spp in SA) Phthiraptera – lice (1150 spp in SA) Hemiptera – bugs (>3500 spp in SA) Coleoptera – beetles (18 000 spp in SA) Lepidoptera – butterflies (794 spp in SA), moths (5200 spp in SA) Diptera – flies (4800 spp in SA) Siphonoptera – fleas (100 spp in SA) Hymenoptera – ants, bees, wasps (>6000 spp in SA) Trichoptera – caddisflies (195 spp in SA) Thysanoptera – thrips (230 spp in SA) Vertebrata Tunicata (sea creatures, etc) Fish Amphibia Reptiles Birds Mammals (115 spp in SA) (255 spp in SA) (858 spp in SA) (244 spp in SA) Bome – Trees (n=77) Koffiebauhinia - Bauhinia petersiana - Dainty bauhinia Rooi-ivoor - Berchemia zeyheri - Red ivory Witgat - Boscia albitrunca - Shepherd’s tree Bergvaalbos - Brachylaena rotundata - Mountain silver-oak
    [Show full text]
  • Otter Slough Conservation Area (Stoddard County, Missouri) by Hugo L
    SOUTHERN LEPIDOPTERISTS’ NEWS VOLUME 43 NO. 2 (2021), PG. 159 A LEPIDOPTERA BIODIVERSITY BLITZ AT THE OTTER SLOUGH CONSERVATION AREA (STODDARD COUNTY, MISSOURI) BY HUGO L. KONS JR. 1 & ROBERT J. BORTH 2 ABSTRACT We conducted a Lepidoptera biodiversity blitz on 3 and Catocala crataegi complex, representing the most 4 June 2018 at the Otter Slough Conservation Area in northerly locality that we are aware of for these Stoddard County, Missouri. We documented as many phenotypes. Recent material was needed for DNA Lepidoptera species as possible with MV/UV lights, sequencing. rotten banana/brown sugar bait, and diurnal collecting with nets. We present records for 235 species, including From 3-4 June 2018 we visited the Otter Slough 193 Macrolepidoptera and 19 Rhopalocera 3. Habitats Conservation Area to sample Catocala and document as sampled include hydric hardwood forest, cypress many other co-occurring Lepidoptera species as swamp, open wetlands, and field. Examples of some possible. This paper reports the Macrolepidoptera and species are shown on 15 color plates of live photos and Rhopalocera species recorded during this survey. This pinned specimens research was conducted under Wildlife Collectors Permit #17910 issued by the Missouri Department of INTRODUCTION Conservation. The Otter Slough Conservation Area is a 4,866 acre area MATERIALS AND METHODS including hydric hardwood forest (Figure 2:B, E-H), cypress-tupelo swamp (Figure 2:A), open marsh with Lepidoptera were sampled with a 400 watt MV cattails, sedge meadow, and cypress (Figure 2:D), illuminated sheet, 175 watt MV light trap, 15 watt UV mowed field (Figure 2:C (middle)), and slough habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Molecular Understanding of the Biosynthesis of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids in Support of Their Expanding Medical Use
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 11713-11741; doi:10.3390/ijms140611713 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review Towards a Molecular Understanding of the Biosynthesis of Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids in Support of Their Expanding Medical Use Adam M. Takos and Fred Rook * Plant Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +45-3533-3343; Fax: +45-3533-3300. Received: 28 April 2013; in revised form: 26 May 2013 / Accepted: 27 May 2013 / Published: 31 May 2013 Abstract: The alkaloids characteristically produced by the subfamily Amaryllidoideae of the Amaryllidaceae, bulbous plant species that include well know genera such as Narcissus (daffodils) and Galanthus (snowdrops), are a source of new pharmaceutical compounds. Presently, only the Amaryllidaceae alkaloid galanthamine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used to treat symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease, is produced commercially as a drug from cultivated plants. However, several Amaryllidaceae alkaloids have shown great promise as anti-cancer drugs, but their further clinical development is restricted by their limited commercial availability. Amaryllidaceae species have a long history of cultivation and breeding as ornamental bulbs, and phytochemical research has focussed on the diversity in alkaloid content and composition. In contrast to the available pharmacological and phytochemical data, ecological, physiological and molecular aspects of the Amaryllidaceae and their alkaloids are much less explored and the identity of the alkaloid biosynthetic genes is presently unknown. An improved molecular understanding of Amaryllidaceae alkaloid biosynthesis would greatly benefit the rational design of breeding programs to produce cultivars optimised for the production of pharmaceutical compounds and enable biotechnology based approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • BRUNSVIGIA ORIENTALIS Candelabra flower, Koningskandelaar, Perdespookbossie Amaryllidaceae
    SNR FACT SHEET BRUNSVIGIA ORIENTALIS Candelabra flower, Koningskandelaar, Perdespookbossie Amaryllidaceae Late summer in Steenbok Park sees the emergence of the spectacular crimson Candelabra flower or Brunsvigia orientalis which grows in scattered colonies in coastal sand. The bud of this large bulb pushes up through the sand on its sturdy stem before a leaf can be seen, and produces up to 40 flowers in a head shaped like a rounded candelabra. As the flowers fade the ovaries enlarge and become papery and eventually the flower stem breaks away and the flower head is blown about, tumbling over the ground and scattering its seeds. These ‘balls’ blowing in the wind no doubt give rise to the Afrikaans name Perdespookbossie. The plant was initially called Amaryllis orientalis, but in 1753 Lorenz Heister, a botanist and professor of medicine at the University of Helmstädt, renamed it Brunsvigia in honour of his patron the Duke of Brunswick. Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand (1735-1806), a cultured and benevolent despot, promoted the study of plants. The bulb had been sent to Germany in 1748 by Cape Governor, Ryk Tulbagh, who was very interested in the flora and fauna of the Cape and regularly sent plants and stuffed animals to Europe. Brunsvigias are deciduous and have adapted to the dry period of the year by resting underground. The large flower heads appear shortly before the rainy season. Sunbirds searching for nectar in the tubular flowers are their chief pollinators. Once the seeds have been scattered they germinate very quickly, giving the seedling a full rainy season to develop sufficiently to withstand its first dry season underground.
    [Show full text]
  • From Transgenic Bt and Non-Bt Cotton
    microorganisms Article Bacterial Microbiota of Field-Collected Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Transgenic Bt and Non-Bt Cotton Jean M. Deguenon 1, Anirudh Dhammi 1, Loganathan Ponnusamy 1,* , Nicholas V. Travanty 1, Grayson Cave 1, Roger Lawrie 1 , Dan Mott 1, Dominic Reisig 1 , Ryan Kurtz 2 and R. Michael Roe 1 1 Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, 3230 Ligon Street, Campus Box 7647, Raleigh, NC 27695-7647, USA; [email protected] (J.M.D.); [email protected] (A.D.); [email protected] (N.V.T.); [email protected] (G.C.); [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (D.R.); [email protected] (R.M.R.) 2 Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC 27513, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is an important agricul- tural pest in U.S. cotton and is managed using transgenic hybrids that produce insecticidal proteins from the bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The reduced efficacy against H. zea caterpillars of Bt plants expressing Cry toxins is increasing in the field. In a first step towards understanding Bt cotton– bollworm–microbiota interactions, we investigated the internal bacterial microbiota of second–third stadium H. zea collected in the field from non-Bt versus Bt (WideStrike) cotton in close proximity (in North Carolina, USA). The bacterial populations were analyzed using culture-dependent and -independent molecular approaches. We found that WideStrike samples had a higher bacterial density Citation: Deguenon, J.M.; Dhammi, and diversity per larva than insects collected from non-Bt cotton over two field seasons: 8.42 ± 0.23 A.; Ponnusamy, L.; Travanty, N.V.; ± ± Cave, G.; Lawrie, R.; Mott, D.; Reisig, and 5.36 0.75 (log10 colony forming units per insect) for WideStrike compared to 6.82 0.20 D.; Kurtz, R.; Roe, R.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Phylogeny Drives the Structure and Diversity of Insect Microbiota
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.452888; this version posted July 29, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Host species identity shapes the diversity and structure of insect microbiota Antonino Malacrinò1* 1Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany *Corresponding author, [email protected] Abstract As for most of the life that inhabits our planet, microorganisms play an essential role in the fitness of insects, including nutrition, reproduction, defence and many other functions. More re- cently, we assisted to an exponential growth of studies describing the taxonomical composition of bacterial communities across insects’ phylogeny. However, there is still an outstanding question that needs to be answered: which factors contribute most in shaping insects’ microbiomes? This study tries to find an answer to this question by taking advantage of publicly available sequencing data and reanalysing over 4,000 samples of insect-associated bacterial communities under a common framework. Results suggest that insect taxonomy has a wider impact on the structure and diversity of their associated microbial communities than the other factors considered (diet, sex, life stage, sample origin and treatment). However, when specifically testing for signatures of co-diversification of insect species and their microbiota, analyses found a weak support for this, suggesting that while insect species strongly drives the structure and diversity of insect microbiota, the diversification of those microbial communities did not follow their host's phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Policy Review: Alternative Risk Management Measures to Import Lilium Spp
    International plant protection convention 14_EWGCutFlowers_2014_June Final policy review Lilium spp. Agenda Item: 4.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final policy review: Alternative risk management measures to import Lilium spp. cut flowers from Taiwan December 2013 International plant protection convention 14_EWGCutFlowers_2014_June Final policy review Lilium spp. Agenda Item: 4.1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © Commonwealth of Australia Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, except for content supplied by third parties, photographic images, logos, and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration Sources
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]