DOCSLIB.ORG

Mole Valley District Council Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Final Report February 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mole Valley District Council Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Final Report February 2018 Mole Valley District Council Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Final Report February 2018 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services | Mole Valley District Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment February 2017 Opinion Research Services | The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Steve Jarman, Claire Thomas and Ciara Small enquiries: 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk © Copyright February 2018 Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government \licence v 3.0 Contains OS Data © Crown Copyright (2018) Opinion Research Services | Mole Valley District Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment February 2017 Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 1 Introduction and Methodology ................................................................................................................... 1 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Additional Pitch Needs – Gypsies and Travellers ........................................................................................ 2 Additional Plot Needs - Travelling Showpeople .......................................................................................... 3 Transit Requirements .................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Introduction .................................................................................................. 5 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................... 5 The Planning Definition in PPTS (2015) ....................................................................................................... 5 Definition of Travelling ................................................................................................................................ 6 Legislation and Guidance for Gypsies and Travellers .................................................................................. 8 PPTS (2015).................................................................................................................................................. 8 3. Methodology ............................................................................................... 14 Background ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Stakeholder Engagement .......................................................................................................................... 15 Working Collaboratively with Neighbouring Planning Authorities ........................................................... 15 Timing of the Fieldwork ............................................................................................................................. 18 4. Gypsy, Traveller & Travelling Showpeople Sites & Population .................... 24 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 24 Sites and Yards in Mole Valley................................................................................................................... 25 Traveller Caravan Count ............................................................................................................................ 25 5. Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................................ 26 6. Survey of Travelling Communities ............................................................... 40 Interviews with Gypsies and Travellers ..................................................................................................... 40 7. Current and Future Pitch Provision .............................................................. 42 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 42 New Household Formation Rates ............................................................................................................. 42 Breakdown by 5 Year Bands ...................................................................................................................... 44 Applying the Planning Definition ............................................................................................................... 44 Pitch Needs – Unknown Gypsies and Travellers ....................................................................................... 46 Pitch Needs - Gypsies and Travellers that do not meet the Planning Definition ...................................... 47 Opinion Research Services | Mole Valley District Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment February 2017 Travelling Showpeople Needs ................................................................................................................... 48 Plot Needs – Travelling Showpeople that meet the Planning Definition .................................................. 48 Plot Needs – Unknown Travelling Showpeople ........................................................................................ 49 Plot Needs – Travelling Showpeople who do not meet the Planning Definition ...................................... 49 Transit Requirements ................................................................................................................................ 49 DCLG Traveller Caravan Count .................................................................................................................. 49 Stakeholder Interviews and Local Data ..................................................................................................... 50 Potential Implications of PPTS (2015) ....................................................................................................... 50 Transit Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 50 List of Figures ................................................................................................... 52 Appendix A: Glossary of Terms ........................................................................ 53 Appendix B: Unknown Households .................................................................. 55 Appendix C: Households that do not meet the Planning Definition ................. 57 Appendix D: Sites and Yards Lists (June 2017) ................................................. 59 Appendix E: Household Interview Questions ................................................... 60 Appendix F: Technical Note on Household Formation and Growth Rates ........ 70 Opinion Research Services | Mole Valley District Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment February 2017 1. Executive Summary Introduction and Methodology 1.1 The primary objective of this Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (GTAA) is to provide a robust assessment of current and future need for Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople accommodation in the District of Mole Valley. As well as updating previous GTAAs, another key reason for completing the study was the publication of a revised version of Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS) in August 2015. This included a change to the definition of Travellers for planning purposes. The key change that was made was the removal of the term persons…who have ceased to travel permanently, meaning that those who have ceased to travel permanently will not now fall under the planning definition of a Traveller for the purposes of assessing accommodation need in a GTAA (see Paragraph 2.7 for the full definition). 1.2 The GTAA provides a robust and credible evidence base which can be used to aid the implementation of Development Plan policies and the provision of new Gypsy and Traveller pitches and Travelling Showpeople plots for the period up to 2033. The outcomes of this study supersede the outcomes of any previous GTAAs completed in Mole Valley. 1.3 The GTAA has sought to understand the accommodation needs of the Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpeople population in Mole Valley through a combination of desk-based research, stakeholder interviews and engagement with members of the travelling community living on all known sites. A total of 22 interviews were completed with Gypsies and Travellers, and 1 interview was completed with a Travelling Showperson. Details of 1 household that was not able to be interviewed were obtained from a recent planning application. ORS attempted to contact 9 families living in bricks and mortar and on the waiting list for a public site, however half of the telephone numbers provided were not in service and the 4 others did not want to take part in the study. One interview was completed with a Gypsy who current has no fixed abode; however this person had already been included in the Reigate and Banstead GTAA. 1.4 The fieldwork for the study was completed between May and August 2017, which was after the publication of PPTS (2015). As a result of this, questions were included in the household interviews to enable the planning status of households
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (As of 18/11/2019)
    Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (as of 18/11/2019) Date The following information has been designed to be shared with the relevant local Job Centre Plus / Stake Holder offices with the intention that they can promote these opportunities to their clients. It is important that these reports are used only as a guide, and that you log onto Find an apprenticeship for the most up to date information. Please be aware that vacancies that appear to have no applications may be recruiting via their own recruitment pages - these will be shaded green. Please do not contact the employer unless stated in the vacancy. If you require more information than is described, please contact the learning provider in the first instance; their contact details will be available in the advert. Registered & Currently Active Candidates refers to those who have registered and engaged with the Find an apprenticeship system and are still active on the system. (Candidates can become inactive voluntarily e.g. by being successful with no need to use the system further) Key: No applications have yet been received for this vacancy Applications going directly to employer website and can't be counted Vacancy Title Vacancy Title Apprentice Support Care Worker Infrastructure Technician Apprenticeship - 19277 Business Admin Apprentice Dorking ARC Volkswagen Group Mechanical, Electrical and Trim (MET) Technician Apprentice Dorking ARC Volkswagen Group Paint Technician Apprentice Level 2 Hospitality Team Member Apprenticeship Optical Assistant Apprenticeship - LEATHERHEAD SPECSAVERS
    [Show full text]
  • Crawley Borough Council
    Agenda item no. 9 GATWICK AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCES – CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL List of Planning Applications Determined During the Period 1st April to 30th June 2013 CR/2011/0573/CON NORTH TERMINAL, GATWICK AIRPORT, FURLONG WAY, GATWICK, CRAWLEY CONSULTATION FROM GATWICK AIRPORT LIMITED FOR LANDSCAPING, PUBLIC REALM ENHANCEMENTS AND PROVISION OF A COVERED WALKWAY Tandridge District Council No Objection Mole Valley District Council No Objection WSCC None Received Reigate & Banstead BC No Objection The Safeguarding Department No Objection – Cranes condition Mid Sussex District Council None Received Horsham District Council None Received Surrey County Council None Received. NATS No Objection Counter Terrorism Security Advisor None received Decision – Permit 03/05/2013 CR/2011/0540/CON NORTHGATE HOUSE, LONDON GATWICK AIRPORT, LONGBRIDGE GATE, GATWICK, CRAWLEY CONSULTATION FROM GATWICK AIRPORT FOR THE CHANGE OF USE TO THE NORTHGATE BUILDING, NORTH TERMINAL FROM B8 (STORAGE) TO B1 (BUSINESS) Mid Sussex District Council No comments Horsham District Council None Received Tandridge District Council No Objection Mole Valley District Council None Received WSCC None Received Reigate & Banstead BC No Objection Surrey County Council No comment Decision – No objection 01/05/2013 The applicant is advised however to ensure that flood resiliance measure are built into the development that is located in an Environment Agency Zone 3 Flood Risk Area. CR/2013/0103/FUL FIRST POINT, BUCKINGHAM GATE, GATWICK, CRAWLEY INSTALLATION OF 1 X AIR HANDLING UNIT, 1 X HEAT RECOVERY UNIT WITHIN THE EXISTING ACOUSTIC ENCLOSURE ON ROOF AND 2 X EXTERNAL CONDENSERS ON ROOF ADJACENT TO ENCLOSURE NATS None received GAL Aerodrome Safeguarding No Objection - subject to Cranes Informative CBC Environmental Health No comments Decision – Permit 25/04/2013 Informative in relation to cranes, in addition to standard conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-Formas
    Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-formas Issue Rev C | 14 March 2016 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 243074-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Local Area 1 Area (ha) 453.1 Location Plan Strategic Area Strategic Area C lies on the fringes of a much wider area of strategic Green Belt which extends Summary across much of Surrey. Its strategic role in Elmbridge is to prevent the town of Oxshott / Cobham from merging with Ashtead and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham in Mole Valley, though it is also important for preventing encroachment into open countryside. Much of the Area retains an unspoilt and open, rural character, though in some isolated localities ribbon development along roads and the loss of arable farmland to horse paddocks has diminished this character somewhat. At the strategic level, the Strategic Area plays an important role in meeting the fundamental aim of Green Belt policy to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. Assessment of the Strategic Area against the relevant NPPF Purposes is as follows: - Purpose 1 – Meets the Purpose moderately by acting as an important barrier to potential sprawl from the Guildford urban area, Ash and Tongham urban area, Dorking, and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham / Ashtead. - Purpose 2 – Meets the Purpose strongly by establishing important gaps between a number of Surrey towns from merging into one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Rehabilitation Service (IRS)
    Contact details Need to contact the service? Referrals to the Integrated Rehabilitation Service are Please see the Contact details section of this leafl et. made from either your GP or another healthcare professional. Your experiences If you are already a patient within the service, you can contact your local team directly on the following CSH Surrey is committed to putting people fi rst and numbers: continually improving services through listening and responding to feedback. To share your experiences, Mole Valley team please: T: 01372 384 310 Call: 020 8394 3846/43 East Elmbridge, Epsom, Ewell and Banstead team Email: [email protected] T: 01372 734 791 Or write to the Head Offi ce address below. Large print, audio format or another language Call 020 8394 3846/43 or email [email protected] to receive this information in large print, audio format or another language. Integrated General enquiries Rehabilitation Visit www.cshsurrey.co.uk for information and Service (IRS) contact details for all other CSH Surrey services. Provided by CSH Surrey and A heart in the community Surrey County Council CSH Surrey, proud to be part of the CSH Group. As a social enterprise, CSH makes profi t to benefi t local communities and to enhance its health and care services. CSH Surrey, Head Offi ce Better healthcare together Ewell Court Clinic, Ewell Court Avenue CSH Surrey, providing NHS community nursing Ewell, Epsom, KT19 0DZ and therapy services in the homes, schools, clinics Company registered number 5700920 and hospitals in the heart of Surrey since 2006. CSH/AD 007-06/14 What is our aim? For how long will you be About the team The aim of the Integrated Rehabilitation Service is to supported by the service? The IRS service brings together a wide range of enable adults to remain as independent as possible, professions and skills from both CSH Surrey and Adult taking into account health and social circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond
    The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond Hugo Bessis and Adeline Bailly October, 2017 1 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 About Centre for Cities Centre for Cities is a research and policy institute, dedicated to improving the economic success of UK cities. We are a charity that works with cities, business and Whitehall to develop and implement policy that supports the performance of urban economies. We do this through impartial research and knowledge exchange. For more information, please visit www.centreforcities.org/about About the authors Hugo Bessis is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4323 Adeline Bailly is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4317 Picture credit “Astral Towers” by Andy Skudder (http://bit.ly/2krxCKQ), licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0) Supported by 2 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 Executive Summary The Gatwick Diamond is not only one of the South East’s strongest economies, but also one of the UK’s best performing areas. But growth brings with it a number of pressures too, which need to be managed to maintain the success of the area. This report measures the performance of the Gatwick Diamond relative to four comparator areas in the South East, benchmarking its success and setting out some of the policy challenges for the future. The Gatwick Diamond makes a strong contribution to the UK economy. It performs well above the national average on a range of different economic indicators, such as its levels of productivity, its share of high-skilled jobs, and its track record of attracting foreign investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 2B Horsham District Council
    Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right (2020) Contains BGS data © NERC 2020. All rights reserved. Mole Valley District Council Waverley Borough Council Crawley Borough Council Chichester District Council Mid Sussex District Council LEGEND Horsham District Boundary BRICKEARTH South Downs National Park CLAY-WITH-FLINTS LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS (UNDIFFERENTIATED) Upper Mole Catchment Arun District Arun District RAISED MARINE DEPOSITS (UNDIFFERENTIATED) Council Superficial Geology Council RIVER TERRACE DEPOSITS (UNDIFFERENTIATED) Brighton ALLUVIUM SAND AND GRAVEL OF UNCERTAIN AGE AND ORIGIN Adur District and Hove 0 Council2 4 6 8 10 City Council12km Project Title/Drawing Title Notes Client AECOM 1. Superficial deposits (formerly known as 'drift' HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL by BGS) are the youngest geological deposits Midpoint HORSHAM DISTRICT formed during the most recent period of Drawn Checked Approved Alençon Link, Basingstoke geological time, the Quaternary, which extends Hampshire, RG21 7PP COUNCIL SFRA back about 2.6 million years from the present. SB SL EC They rest on older deposits or rocks referred to Telephone (01256) 310200 as bedrock. Date Scale @ A3 Purpose of Issue Fax (01256) 310201 2. The data shown is the BGS Superficial 17/01/2020 1:85,000 FINAL www.aecom.com FIGURE 2B- SUPERFICIAL Deposits Geology data. Drawing Number Rev THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF DEPOSITS AECOM'S APPOINTMENT BY ITS CLIENT. AECOM ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR ANY USE OF THIS 02 DOCUMENT OTHER THAN BY ITS ORIGINAL CLIENT OR FOLLOWING AECOM'S EXPRESS AGREEMENT FIGURE 2B TO SUCH USE, AND ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED AND PROVIDED.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Area Local Authorities Covered by Funding Provisional 2020/21
    Lead area Local authorities covered by funding Provisional 2020/21 funding allocation Adur and Worthing £421,578.00 Arun £318,817.00 Ashford £257,000.00 Babergh Babergh and Mid Suffolk (lead) £163,498.00 West Suffolk Barking and Dagenham £184,703.00 Barnet £636,845.00 Barnsley £102,900.00 Basildon £474,871.00 Basingstoke and Deane £199,850.00 Bath and North East Somerset £417,151.00 Bedford £986,915.00 Birmingham £684,666.00 Blackburn with Darwen Hyndburn BC £184,000.00 Ribble Valley BC Burnley BC Pendle BC Rossendale BC Blackpool £200,000.00 Bolton £124,997.00 Boston £385,451.00 Bournemouth, Christchurch and £1,401,333.00 Poole Bracknell Forest £356,141.00 Bradford £461,320.00 Breckland £106,500.00 Brent £827,422.00 Brighton and Hove £2,042,637.00 Bristol, City of £2,814,768.00 Bromley £103,654.00 Broxbourne £119,380.00 Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Vale £576,500.00 Wycombe Chiltern South Bucks Bury £40,000.00 Calderdale £253,945.00 Cambridge £486,457.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £229,500.00 Camden £1,327,000.00 Canterbury £584,739.00 Carlisle (lead for all Cumbrian Allerdale Borough Council £416,340.00 authorities) Barrow Borough Council Carlisle City Council Copeland Borough Council Cumbria County Council Eden District Council South Lakeland District Council Central Bedfordshire £329,938.00 Cheshire East £438,329.30 Cheshire West and Chester £731,034.00 Chichester £230,465.00 City of London £590,300.00 Colchester £296,144.00 Corby East Northamptonshire £113,000.00 Kettering Wellingborough Cornwall £1,696,467.00 County Durham £269,128.35
    [Show full text]
  • Application No
    Date: 11/06/2021 Page 1 Mole Valley District Council Applications Registered Application Ref: MO/2021/0672/PLAH Link Location: 71, Links Road, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2HL Proposal: Erection of single storey rear extension, new porch, garage conversion and new pitched roof to existing first floor dormer. Case Officer: Sue James Registration Date: 03-Jun-2021 Applicant Name: Mr N Herbert Ward: Ashtead Common PSH/Area: Ashtead (Unparished) Application Ref: MO/2021/0883/CAT Link Location: The Old Parsonage, Dene Road, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1ED Proposal: Cut back branches of one Robinia tree to boundary line with 11, Berry Walk, Ashtead. Case Officer: Ron Howe Registration Date: 04-Jun-2021 Applicant Name: Mrs Gillian Coombes Ward: Ashtead Park PSH/Area: Ashtead (Unparished) Application Ref: MO/2021/0899/CC Link Location: City Of London Freemens School, Park Lane, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1ET Proposal: Variation of condition 2 of approved planning permission MO/2018/1487 for internal and external alterations, refurbishment and associated works to include new dining hall and Orangery roofs, new energy centre and district heating network pipe and landscaping works. (Application for Listed Building Consent), to allow development in accordance with revised plans FMH-HBA-ZZ-01-DR-A-42-0136 (Rev P01); FMH-HBA-ZZ-01-DR-A-42-0137 (Rev P01); FMH-HBA-ZZ-01-DR-A-42-0138 (Rev P01); and FMH-HBA-ZZ-01-DR-A-42-0139 (Rev P01). Case Officer: Sherelle Munnis Registration Date: 11-May-2021 Applicant Name: City of London Corporation Ward: Ashtead Park PSH/Area: Ashtead (Unparished) Date: 11/06/2021 Page 2 Mole Valley District Council Applications Registered Application Ref: MO/2021/0845/TFC Link Location: 3, West Farm Drive, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2LB Proposal: T1 - Oak - reduce to previous reduction points.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting 35 Local Growth Fund Risk Register
    Annex 006- Coast to Capital LGF Risk Register Dashboard Overall Risk Total LGF Project Approval Target Brief Description of Reasoning behind No Project Name Growth Deal Investment Theme Lead Delivery Body Rating allocation all years status Completion Date Risk Score (out of 25) 47 Gatwick Skills GD1 Skill TBC £4,706,959 Not yet approved TBC 22.0 Project under review. C2C will be organising an independent review on this project, which in turn will Business Case in 52 Gatwick Railway Station GD2 Transport Network Rail £10,000,000 TBC Under Review assess which risk category it falls into. Development Business case in development. Flex of 991,245 being reported in 17/18, plus just over 3.6mil of LGF. Project 13 Preston Barracks CRL GD1 Urban Regeneration Brighton & Hove City Council £7,700,000 Delivering Q4 18/19 19.0 experiencing planning delays. Match and outputs still being reported/monitored C2C will be organising an independent review on this project, which in turn will assess which risk category it falls into. Brighton Valley Gardens Phase 51 GD1 Transport Brighton & Hove City Council £6,000,000 Not yet approved TBC Under Review 3 Development of phase 3, is dependant on phases 1+2 - business case will come forward towards the end of phase 1+2 project. Project under review. New scheme to be 3 Business Finance GD1 Business Support / Space Under Review £3,212,822 Under Review TBC 18.0 launched later in the year. C2C will be organising an independent review on this project, which in turn will Newhaven Port Access Road DFT Retained assess which risk category it falls into.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole-Valley-Leaflet.Pdf
    Telecare Services (Including Community Alarm) Supporting independence and peace of mind at home This service is brought to you by Mole Valley District Council, installing and monitoring in Mole Valley and Reigate and Banstead areas Emergency Alarm Button What is Telecare? What are the benefits of the Telecare Service? Telecare is the name given to a range of equipment that can be used to summon A friendly, quick and professional help in emergency situations; raising alerts response to all calls received manually or automatically. The equipment A useful aid for added security is designed to assist vulnerable people to live more independently by monitoring A wide range of additional sensors safety around the home. can be linked to the alarm unit to provide you with extra safeguards The basic package consists of an alarm unit, Enables users to remain independent incorporating an emergency button, and a at home in the knowledge that help pendant worn around your neck or wrist. The can be called upon at any time if required pendant works even if you are in a different room to the main unit or in your garden Equipment is versatile and can be (approx 80-100 ft from the base unit). An tailored to your requirements adaptor is also available that allows those Facilitate early and safer discharge with limited strength/movement to operate from hospital or reducing hospital the pendant. admission Help at the touch of a button Automatic alerts can be sent from additional 24-hours/365 days of the year equipment such as a smoke alarm, fall Installation can be arranged within detector, bed/chair sensor, gas detector, 24hours of referral where possible flood detector or pill dispenser.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome Back Fund Allocations
    Welcome Back Fund Allocations Local Authority Allocation of £56 Million Adur £121,721 Allerdale £186,416 Amber Valley £113,425 Arun £208,718 Ashfield £114,528 Ashford £116,815 Babergh £146,635 Barking And Dagenham £189,384 Barnet £352,546 Barnsley £219,400 Barrow-in-Furness £158,859 Basildon £165,814 Basingstoke And Deane £155,751 Bassetlaw £104,654 Bath And North East Somerset £172,615 Bedford £154,129 Bexley £220,176 Birmingham £1,016,936 Blaby £91,483 Blackburn with Darwen £131,610 Blackpool £222,771 Bolsover £71,400 1 Local Authority Allocation of £56 Million Bolton £253,140 Boston £62,811 Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole £416,323 Bracknell Forest £108,686 Bradford £477,170 Braintree £134,418 Breckland £125,275 Brent £295,908 Brentwood £67,383 Brighton And Hove £324,269 Bristol £415,785 Broadland £116,155 Bromley £295,178 Bromsgrove £88,668 Broxbourne £85,548 Broxtowe £101,459 Buckinghamshire Council £481,588 Burnley £78,758 Bury £169,235 Calderdale £186,099 Cambridge £110,675 Camden £239,768 Cannock Chase £89,623 Canterbury £211,700 2 Local Authority Allocation of £56 Million Carlisle £95,875 Castle Point £144,835 Central Bedfordshire £255,873 Charnwood £165,450 Chelmsford £159,001 Cheltenham £103,578 Cherwell £133,843 Cheshire East £339,534 Cheshire West and Chester £370,395 Chesterfield £92,638 Chichester £173,161 Chorley £105,438 City of London £30,000 Colchester £239,003 Copeland £159,920 Corby £64,668 Cornwall £609,639 Cotswold £81,144 Coventry £334,308 Craven £50,436 Crawley £100,153 Croydon £341,995 Dacorum £137,473 Darlington
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authorities Adur & Worthing District Council Allerdale Borough
    Local Authorities Adur & Worthing District Council Allerdale Borough Council Amber Valley Borough Council Anglia Revenues Partnership Arun District Council Ashford Borough Council Aylesbury Vale District Council Barnet L.B Barrow-in-Furness Borough Council Basildon District Council Basingstoke & Deane Council Bath & North East Somerset Council Bedfordshire County Council Birmingham City Council Blaby District Council Blackburn District Council Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council Blackpool Borough Council Blaenau Gwent County Council Bolton Council Boston Borough Council Bracknell Forest Borough Council Braintree District Council Brent Council Bridgenorth District Council Brighton & Hove City Council Bristol City Council Bromsgrove District Council Buckinghamshire County Council Burnley Borough Council Caerphilly County Borough Council Cambridge City Council Cambridgeshire County Council Camden L.B Cannock Chase District Council Cheltenham Borough Council Cherwell Valley District Council Chiltern District Council Copeland Borough Council Cornwall Council Cotswold District Council Coventry City Council Croydon L.B Cumbria County Council Dacorum Council Darlington Borough Council Daventry District Council Denbighshire CC Derbyshire County Council Devon County Council Dorset County Council Durham County Council Ealing L.B East Ayreshire Council East Dumbartonshire Council East Hertfordshire Council East Northamptonshire Council East Riding of Yorkshire Council Eastbourne Borough Council Ellesmere Port & Neston Borough Council Enfield L.B
    [Show full text]