DOCSLIB.ORG

Norwich Union Fun in Athletics Festival South East Regional Festival the Triangle, Burgess Hill Sunday 20 January, 2008 We Welco

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Norwich Union Fun in Athletics Festival South East Regional Festival the Triangle, Burgess Hill Sunday 20 January, 2008 We Welco Norwich Union Fun in Athletics Festival South East Regional Festival The Triangle, Burgess Hill Sunday 20 January, 2008 We welcome teams today from … Dorking & Mole Valley AC red Harlands yellow Haywards Heath Harriers green Lewes AC blue Malling & Sevenoaks purple Martlets / Blue Stars orange Minterne sky Slough Juniors AC white Thomas A Beckett maroon Competition: Venue: Date NUFIA-South East Regional Festival Under 11 Boys The Triangle, Burgess Hill 20 Jan 2008 Ranking Team Colour Score OR 1+1 4x1 P6 OU HR GP BT CP J ST SB SLJ STJ TT VJ 1 Minterne sky 430 28 24 22 30 24 26 22 30 29 28 30 28 28 30 23 28 2 Thomas A Beckett maroon 424 30 30 30 28 28 29 24 26 25 26 26 26 24 26 20 26 3 Malling & Sevenoaks purple 415 26 26 26 24 30 29 26 24 29 18 16 30 26 28 27 30 4 Harlands yellow 397 24 28 28 26 22 24 28 17 25 30 28 24 20 24 27 22 5 Dorking & Mole Valley AC red 374 22 22 24 22 26 21 30 28 17 21 21 22 30 18 30 20 6 Martlets / Blue Stars orange 313 20 18 20 14 20 18 18 17 17 24 18 20 22 20 23 24 7 Lewes AC blue 299 16 20 18 18 18 21 16 22 22 21 21 16 18 16 18 18 8 Haywards Heath Harriers green 282 14 14 14 20 16 16 20 20 20 16 24 18 16 22 16 16 9 Slough Juniors AC white 220 18 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 0 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Competition: Venue: Date NUFIA-South East Regional Festival Under 11 Boys The Triangle, Burgess Hill 20 Jan 2008 Ranking Team Colour Score OR 1+1 4x1 P6 OU HR GP BT CP J ST SB SLJ STJ TT VJ 1 Minterne sky 430 28 24 22 30 24 26 22 30 29 28 30 28 28 30 23 28 2 Thomas A Beckett maroon 424 30 30 30 28 28 29 24 26 25 26 26 26 24 26 20 26 3 Malling & Sevenoaks purple 415 26 26 26 24 30 29 26 24 29 18 16 30 26 28 27 30 4 Harlands yellow 397 24 28 28 26 22 24 28 17 25 30 28 24 20 24 27 22 5 Dorking & Mole Valley AC red 374 22 22 24 22 26 21 30 28 17 21 21 22 30 18 30 20 6 Martlets / Blue Stars orange 313 20 18 20 14 20 18 18 17 17 24 18 20 22 20 23 24 7 Lewes AC blue 299 16 20 18 18 18 21 16 22 22 21 21 16 18 16 18 18 8 Haywards Heath Harriers green 282 14 14 14 20 16 16 20 20 20 16 24 18 16 22 16 16 9 Slough Juniors AC white 220 18 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 0 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Name Event Perf1 Perf2 Perf3 Perf4 Best Ranking 1 Tom Adey STJ 4.61 4.73 0.00 4.73 17 1 Tom Adey TT 10 5 1 1 17 5= 2 Tomme Chappel SB 43 43 19= 3 Tom Francis VJ 41 42 40 42 9 4 Nickolas Harris SB 48 48 11= 4 Nickolas Harris SLJ 2.07 1.88 1.60 2.07 1 5 Callum Ritchie BT 15 15 15 11 56 3= 5 Callum Ritchie VJ 31 31 32 32 17 6 Sam McCormich SLJ 1.64 1.81 1.72 1.81 9 6 Sam McCormich TT 10 3 6 1 20 2= 7 Toby Nash J 18 15 15 18 9 8 Joe Pallips ST 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 14 8 Joe Pallips STJ 4.39 4.61 4.50 4.61 18 9 James Warmsley CP 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.50 13 9 James Warmsley VJ 26 26 26 26 24 10 Kieran Wargh BT 6 2 2 4 14 23= 10 Kieran Wargh SLJ 1.67 1.59 1.69 1.69 16 11 Lewis Winstone CP 4.00 4.50 4.00 4.50 15 11 Lewis Winstone STJ 4.20 3.91 4.33 4.33 21 12 Ben Stowell ST 5.75 6.25 5.25 6.25 9 12 Ben Stowell SB 40 40 24= 13 Joe Blunt BT 15 15 15 14 59 1 13 Joe Blunt J 15 15 15 15 12= Competition: Venue: Date NUFIA-South East Regional Festival Under 11 Boys The Triangle, Burgess Hill 20 Jan 2008 Ranking Team Colour Score OR 1+1 4x1 P6 OU HR GP BT CP J ST SB SLJ STJ TT VJ 1 Minterne sky 430 28 24 22 30 24 26 22 30 29 28 30 28 28 30 23 28 2 Thomas A Beckett maroon 424 30 30 30 28 28 29 24 26 25 26 26 26 24 26 20 26 3 Malling & Sevenoaks purple 415 26 26 26 24 30 29 26 24 29 18 16 30 26 28 27 30 4 Harlands yellow 397 24 28 28 26 22 24 28 17 25 30 28 24 20 24 27 22 5 Dorking & Mole Valley AC red 374 22 22 24 22 26 21 30 28 17 21 21 22 30 18 30 20 6 Martlets / Blue Stars orange 313 20 18 20 14 20 18 18 17 17 24 18 20 22 20 23 24 7 Lewes AC blue 299 16 20 18 18 18 21 16 22 22 21 21 16 18 16 18 18 8 Haywards Heath Harriers green 282 14 14 14 20 16 16 20 20 20 16 24 18 16 22 16 16 9 Slough Juniors AC white 220 18 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 0 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Name Event Perf1 Perf2 Perf3 Perf4 Best Ranking 1 Ben Gold ST 7.25 8.50 8.00 8.50 4 1 Ben Gold SB 49 49 9= 2 Conor Harrison SB 50 50 6= 2 Conor Harrison STJ 4.87 5.23 5.25 5.25 7 3 Stephen Best J 18 22 21 22 1 3 Stephen Best SB 46 46 15 4 Will Rennie STJ 5.08 5.06 5.23 5.23 8 4 Will Rennie TT 10 6 2 1 19 4 5 Theo Welch ST 7.75 7.75 7.50 7.75 6 5 Theo Welch STJ 4.20 4.49 4.86 4.86 16 6 Cameron Clay SLJ 1.72 1.77 1.79 1.79 11 7 Hugh Erritt SLJ 1.65 1.80 1.80 1.80 10 7 Hugh Erritt TT 10 5 0 0 15 8= 8 Jasper Menzies CP 0.00 7.00 7.25 7.25 1 9 Luke Hayward J 18 21 19 21 2 9 Luke Hayward SLJ 1.31 1.36 1.38 1.38 24 10 Rory Harrison BT 3 3 6 8 20 16= 10 Rory Harrison VJ 30 31 34 34 14 11 Daniel Hatton BT 4 6 7 3 20 16= 11 Daniel Hatton VJ 29 31 33 33 16 12 Harry Scott CP 0.00 5.25 5.25 5.25 9 15 Jacob Turner BT 3 6 6 4 19 21 15 Jacob Turner VJ 34 34 35 35 12 Competition: Venue: Date NUFIA-South East Regional Festival Under 11 Boys The Triangle, Burgess Hill 20 Jan 2008 Ranking Team Colour Score OR 1+1 4x1 P6 OU HR GP BT CP J ST SB SLJ STJ TT VJ 1 Minterne sky 430 28 24 22 30 24 26 22 30 29 28 30 28 28 30 23 28 2 Thomas A Beckett maroon 424 30 30 30 28 28 29 24 26 25 26 26 26 24 26 20 26 3 Malling & Sevenoaks purple 415 26 26 26 24 30 29 26 24 29 18 16 30 26 28 27 30 4 Harlands yellow 397 24 28 28 26 22 24 28 17 25 30 28 24 20 24 27 22 5 Dorking & Mole Valley AC red 374 22 22 24 22 26 21 30 28 17 21 21 22 30 18 30 20 6 Martlets / Blue Stars orange 313 20 18 20 14 20 18 18 17 17 24 18 20 22 20 23 24 7 Lewes AC blue 299 16 20 18 18 18 21 16 22 22 21 21 16 18 16 18 18 8 Haywards Heath Harriers green 282 14 14 14 20 16 16 20 20 20 16 24 18 16 22 16 16 9 Slough Juniors AC white 220 18 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 0 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Name Event Perf1 Perf2 Perf3 Perf4 Best Ranking 1 Adam Wakelen ST 5.75 7.00 6.25 7.00 7 1 Adam Wakelen SLJ 1.40 1.41 1.48 1.48 22 2 Theo Nicholls SB 41 41 22= 2 Theo Nicholls STJ 4.81 5.05 4.95 5.05 11 3 George Ratcliffe BT 5 4 3 2 14 23= 3 George Ratcliffe J 12 10 12 12 17 4 Frankie Robinson SB 40 40 24= 4 Frankie Robinson STJ 4.85 5.01 4.82 5.01 13 5 William Boyes CP 4.25 4.25 5.00 5.00 10 5 William Boyes J 15 9 14 15 15 5 William Boyes VJ 27 32 31 32 20 6 Edward Wilson ST 4.50 5.50 6.25 6.25 11 6 Edward Wilson VJ 26 24 26 26 25 7 Thomas Ball BT 8 2 8 2 20 16= 7 Thomas Ball TT 4 1 1 0 6 17 8 Cameron Linnett SLJ 1.48 1.56 1.57 1.57 19 9 Edward Lemay BT 8 4 10 5 27 13 9 Edward Lemay TT 4 5 0 2 11 12= 10 Ben Killick STJ 4.11 4.00 4.05 4.11 23 10 Ben Killick VJ 24 29 29 29 21 11 David Sadler CP 4.25 4.75 4.75 4.75 11 11 David Sadler SLJ 1.20 1.44 1.34 1.44 23 12 Robert Nash SB 41 41 22= Competition: Venue: Date NUFIA-South East Regional Festival Under 11 Boys The Triangle, Burgess Hill 20 Jan 2008 Ranking Team Colour Score OR 1+1 4x1 P6 OU HR GP BT CP J ST SB SLJ STJ TT VJ 1 Minterne sky 430 28 24 22 30 24 26 22 30 29 28 30 28 28 30 23 28 2 Thomas A Beckett maroon 424 30 30 30 28 28 29 24 26 25 26 26 26 24 26 20 26 3 Malling & Sevenoaks purple 415 26 26 26 24 30 29 26 24 29 18 16 30 26 28 27 30 4 Harlands yellow 397 24 28 28 26 22 24 28 17 25 30 28 24 20 24 27 22 5 Dorking & Mole Valley AC red 374 22 22 24 22 26 21 30 28 17 21 21 22 30 18 30 20 6 Martlets / Blue Stars orange 313 20 18 20 14 20 18 18 17 17 24 18 20 22 20 23 24 7 Lewes AC blue 299 16 20 18 18 18 21 16 22 22 21 21 16 18 16 18 18 8 Haywards Heath Harriers green 282 14 14 14 20 16 16 20 20 20 16 24 18 16 22 16 16 9 Slough Juniors AC white 220 18 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 0 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Name Event Perf1 Perf2 Perf3 Perf4 Best Ranking 1 Julian Gower SLJ 1.48 1.52 1.00 1.52 21 2 Sam Monson STJ 2.91 3.22 3.18 3.22 25 2 Sam Monson TT 6 1 2 2 11 12= 2 Sam Monson VJ 23 26 23 26 26 3 Rhys Allan J 17 18 15 18 8 3 Rhys Allan ST 4.50 3.00 5.25 5.25 15 3 Rhys Allan STJ 4.48 4.28 5.05 5.05 12 4 Matthew Massani BT 15 13 13 15 56 3= 4 Matthew Massani CP 4.25 4.00 4.50 4.50 14 5 Scott Staples J 15 15 15 15 12= 5 Scott Staples STJ 3.96 3.89 3.54 3.96 24 5 Scott Staples VJ 27 23 26 27 23 6 Alex Baldy ST 5.75 4.25 6.25 6.25 10 7 Jordan Bowman SB 44 44 17= 7 Jordan Bowman SLJ 1.52 1.65 1.64 1.65 18 8 Luca Bish BT 4 6 6 4 20 16= 8 Luca Bish TT 9 2 4 0 15 8= 9 Nathan James SB 26 26 26 9 Nathan James SLJ 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.33 26 10 William Powell SB 45 45 16 10 William Powell VJ 40 38 43 43 8 13 David Thomas BT 3 2 6 3 14 23= 15 Bailie Rogers CP 5.75 5.75 4.75 5.75 8 Competition: Venue: Date NUFIA-South East Regional Festival Under 11 Boys The Triangle, Burgess Hill 20 Jan 2008 Ranking Team Colour Score OR 1+1 4x1 P6 OU HR GP BT CP J ST SB SLJ STJ TT VJ 1 Minterne sky 430 28 24 22 30 24 26 22 30 29 28 30 28 28 30 23 28 2 Thomas A Beckett maroon 424 30 30 30 28 28 29 24 26 25 26 26 26 24 26 20 26 3 Malling & Sevenoaks purple 415 26 26 26 24 30 29 26 24 29 18 16 30 26 28 27 30 4 Harlands yellow 397 24 28 28 26 22 24 28 17 25 30 28 24 20 24 27 22 5 Dorking & Mole Valley AC red 374 22 22 24 22 26 21 30 28 17 21 21 22 30 18 30 20 6 Martlets / Blue Stars orange 313 20 18 20 14 20 18 18 17 17 24 18 20 22 20 23 24 7 Lewes AC blue 299 16 20 18 18 18 21 16 22 22 21 21 16 18 16 18 18 8 Haywards Heath Harriers green 282 14 14 14 20 16 16 20 20 20 16 24 18 16 22 16 16 9 Slough Juniors AC white 220 18 16 16 16 14 14 14 14 0 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 Name Event Perf1 Perf2 Perf3 Perf4 Best Ranking 1 Jack Pearce BT 13 6 2 8 29 11 1 Jack Pearce STJ 5.39 5.35 5.39 5.39 5 2 Nathan O'Hara CP 6.25 5.75 5.75 6.25 6 3 James Gouldon J 14 15 15 15 14 3 James Gouldon SLJ 1.82 1.87 1.22 1.87 3 3 James Gouldon VJ 44 44 42 44 4= 5 Tommy Brown BT 3 11 15 10 39 8 5 Tommy Brown SB 55 55 2 6 Joseph Fowler J 16 13 13 16 10 6 Joseph Fowler VJ 53 51 53 53 1 7 Ryan Selfe SLJ 1.79 1.77 1.82 1.82 8 8 Jonathan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (As of 18/11/2019)
    Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (as of 18/11/2019) Date The following information has been designed to be shared with the relevant local Job Centre Plus / Stake Holder offices with the intention that they can promote these opportunities to their clients. It is important that these reports are used only as a guide, and that you log onto Find an apprenticeship for the most up to date information. Please be aware that vacancies that appear to have no applications may be recruiting via their own recruitment pages - these will be shaded green. Please do not contact the employer unless stated in the vacancy. If you require more information than is described, please contact the learning provider in the first instance; their contact details will be available in the advert. Registered & Currently Active Candidates refers to those who have registered and engaged with the Find an apprenticeship system and are still active on the system. (Candidates can become inactive voluntarily e.g. by being successful with no need to use the system further) Key: No applications have yet been received for this vacancy Applications going directly to employer website and can't be counted Vacancy Title Vacancy Title Apprentice Support Care Worker Infrastructure Technician Apprenticeship - 19277 Business Admin Apprentice Dorking ARC Volkswagen Group Mechanical, Electrical and Trim (MET) Technician Apprentice Dorking ARC Volkswagen Group Paint Technician Apprentice Level 2 Hospitality Team Member Apprenticeship Optical Assistant Apprenticeship - LEATHERHEAD SPECSAVERS
    [Show full text]
  • Crawley Borough Council
    Agenda item no. 9 GATWICK AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCES – CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL List of Planning Applications Determined During the Period 1st April to 30th June 2013 CR/2011/0573/CON NORTH TERMINAL, GATWICK AIRPORT, FURLONG WAY, GATWICK, CRAWLEY CONSULTATION FROM GATWICK AIRPORT LIMITED FOR LANDSCAPING, PUBLIC REALM ENHANCEMENTS AND PROVISION OF A COVERED WALKWAY Tandridge District Council No Objection Mole Valley District Council No Objection WSCC None Received Reigate & Banstead BC No Objection The Safeguarding Department No Objection – Cranes condition Mid Sussex District Council None Received Horsham District Council None Received Surrey County Council None Received. NATS No Objection Counter Terrorism Security Advisor None received Decision – Permit 03/05/2013 CR/2011/0540/CON NORTHGATE HOUSE, LONDON GATWICK AIRPORT, LONGBRIDGE GATE, GATWICK, CRAWLEY CONSULTATION FROM GATWICK AIRPORT FOR THE CHANGE OF USE TO THE NORTHGATE BUILDING, NORTH TERMINAL FROM B8 (STORAGE) TO B1 (BUSINESS) Mid Sussex District Council No comments Horsham District Council None Received Tandridge District Council No Objection Mole Valley District Council None Received WSCC None Received Reigate & Banstead BC No Objection Surrey County Council No comment Decision – No objection 01/05/2013 The applicant is advised however to ensure that flood resiliance measure are built into the development that is located in an Environment Agency Zone 3 Flood Risk Area. CR/2013/0103/FUL FIRST POINT, BUCKINGHAM GATE, GATWICK, CRAWLEY INSTALLATION OF 1 X AIR HANDLING UNIT, 1 X HEAT RECOVERY UNIT WITHIN THE EXISTING ACOUSTIC ENCLOSURE ON ROOF AND 2 X EXTERNAL CONDENSERS ON ROOF ADJACENT TO ENCLOSURE NATS None received GAL Aerodrome Safeguarding No Objection - subject to Cranes Informative CBC Environmental Health No comments Decision – Permit 25/04/2013 Informative in relation to cranes, in addition to standard conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-Formas
    Elmbridge Borough Council Green Belt Boundary Review Annex Report 2 - Local Area Assessment Pro-formas Issue Rev C | 14 March 2016 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 243074-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Local Area 1 Area (ha) 453.1 Location Plan Strategic Area Strategic Area C lies on the fringes of a much wider area of strategic Green Belt which extends Summary across much of Surrey. Its strategic role in Elmbridge is to prevent the town of Oxshott / Cobham from merging with Ashtead and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham in Mole Valley, though it is also important for preventing encroachment into open countryside. Much of the Area retains an unspoilt and open, rural character, though in some isolated localities ribbon development along roads and the loss of arable farmland to horse paddocks has diminished this character somewhat. At the strategic level, the Strategic Area plays an important role in meeting the fundamental aim of Green Belt policy to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open. Assessment of the Strategic Area against the relevant NPPF Purposes is as follows: - Purpose 1 – Meets the Purpose moderately by acting as an important barrier to potential sprawl from the Guildford urban area, Ash and Tongham urban area, Dorking, and Leatherhead / Bookham / Fetcham / Ashtead. - Purpose 2 – Meets the Purpose strongly by establishing important gaps between a number of Surrey towns from merging into one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Rehabilitation Service (IRS)
    Contact details Need to contact the service? Referrals to the Integrated Rehabilitation Service are Please see the Contact details section of this leafl et. made from either your GP or another healthcare professional. Your experiences If you are already a patient within the service, you can contact your local team directly on the following CSH Surrey is committed to putting people fi rst and numbers: continually improving services through listening and responding to feedback. To share your experiences, Mole Valley team please: T: 01372 384 310 Call: 020 8394 3846/43 East Elmbridge, Epsom, Ewell and Banstead team Email: [email protected] T: 01372 734 791 Or write to the Head Offi ce address below. Large print, audio format or another language Call 020 8394 3846/43 or email [email protected] to receive this information in large print, audio format or another language. Integrated General enquiries Rehabilitation Visit www.cshsurrey.co.uk for information and Service (IRS) contact details for all other CSH Surrey services. Provided by CSH Surrey and A heart in the community Surrey County Council CSH Surrey, proud to be part of the CSH Group. As a social enterprise, CSH makes profi t to benefi t local communities and to enhance its health and care services. CSH Surrey, Head Offi ce Better healthcare together Ewell Court Clinic, Ewell Court Avenue CSH Surrey, providing NHS community nursing Ewell, Epsom, KT19 0DZ and therapy services in the homes, schools, clinics Company registered number 5700920 and hospitals in the heart of Surrey since 2006. CSH/AD 007-06/14 What is our aim? For how long will you be About the team The aim of the Integrated Rehabilitation Service is to supported by the service? The IRS service brings together a wide range of enable adults to remain as independent as possible, professions and skills from both CSH Surrey and Adult taking into account health and social circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Valley District Council Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Final Report February 2018
    Mole Valley District Council Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment Final Report February 2018 Opinion Research Services | The Strand • Swansea • SA1 1AF | 01792 535300 | www.ors.org.uk | [email protected] Opinion Research Services | Mole Valley District Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment February 2017 Opinion Research Services | The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Steve Jarman, Claire Thomas and Ciara Small enquiries: 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk © Copyright February 2018 Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government \licence v 3.0 Contains OS Data © Crown Copyright (2018) Opinion Research Services | Mole Valley District Council – Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment February 2017 Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 1 Introduction and Methodology ................................................................................................................... 1 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Additional Pitch Needs – Gypsies and Travellers ........................................................................................ 2 Additional Plot Needs - Travelling Showpeople .......................................................................................... 3 Transit Requirements .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond
    The Economic Geography of the Gatwick Diamond Hugo Bessis and Adeline Bailly October, 2017 1 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 About Centre for Cities Centre for Cities is a research and policy institute, dedicated to improving the economic success of UK cities. We are a charity that works with cities, business and Whitehall to develop and implement policy that supports the performance of urban economies. We do this through impartial research and knowledge exchange. For more information, please visit www.centreforcities.org/about About the authors Hugo Bessis is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4323 Adeline Bailly is a Researcher at Centre for Cities [email protected] / 0207 803 4317 Picture credit “Astral Towers” by Andy Skudder (http://bit.ly/2krxCKQ), licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0) Supported by 2 Centre for Cities The economic geography of the Gatwick Diamond • October, 2017 Executive Summary The Gatwick Diamond is not only one of the South East’s strongest economies, but also one of the UK’s best performing areas. But growth brings with it a number of pressures too, which need to be managed to maintain the success of the area. This report measures the performance of the Gatwick Diamond relative to four comparator areas in the South East, benchmarking its success and setting out some of the policy challenges for the future. The Gatwick Diamond makes a strong contribution to the UK economy. It performs well above the national average on a range of different economic indicators, such as its levels of productivity, its share of high-skilled jobs, and its track record of attracting foreign investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 2B Horsham District Council
    Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right (2020) Contains BGS data © NERC 2020. All rights reserved. Mole Valley District Council Waverley Borough Council Crawley Borough Council Chichester District Council Mid Sussex District Council LEGEND Horsham District Boundary BRICKEARTH South Downs National Park CLAY-WITH-FLINTS LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS (UNDIFFERENTIATED) Upper Mole Catchment Arun District Arun District RAISED MARINE DEPOSITS (UNDIFFERENTIATED) Council Superficial Geology Council RIVER TERRACE DEPOSITS (UNDIFFERENTIATED) Brighton ALLUVIUM SAND AND GRAVEL OF UNCERTAIN AGE AND ORIGIN Adur District and Hove 0 Council2 4 6 8 10 City Council12km Project Title/Drawing Title Notes Client AECOM 1. Superficial deposits (formerly known as 'drift' HORSHAM DISTRICT COUNCIL by BGS) are the youngest geological deposits Midpoint HORSHAM DISTRICT formed during the most recent period of Drawn Checked Approved Alençon Link, Basingstoke geological time, the Quaternary, which extends Hampshire, RG21 7PP COUNCIL SFRA back about 2.6 million years from the present. SB SL EC They rest on older deposits or rocks referred to Telephone (01256) 310200 as bedrock. Date Scale @ A3 Purpose of Issue Fax (01256) 310201 2. The data shown is the BGS Superficial 17/01/2020 1:85,000 FINAL www.aecom.com FIGURE 2B- SUPERFICIAL Deposits Geology data. Drawing Number Rev THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO AND SUBJECT TO THE TERMS OF DEPOSITS AECOM'S APPOINTMENT BY ITS CLIENT. AECOM ACCEPTS NO LIABILITY FOR ANY USE OF THIS 02 DOCUMENT OTHER THAN BY ITS ORIGINAL CLIENT OR FOLLOWING AECOM'S EXPRESS AGREEMENT FIGURE 2B TO SUCH USE, AND ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED AND PROVIDED.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Area Local Authorities Covered by Funding Provisional 2020/21
    Lead area Local authorities covered by funding Provisional 2020/21 funding allocation Adur and Worthing £421,578.00 Arun £318,817.00 Ashford £257,000.00 Babergh Babergh and Mid Suffolk (lead) £163,498.00 West Suffolk Barking and Dagenham £184,703.00 Barnet £636,845.00 Barnsley £102,900.00 Basildon £474,871.00 Basingstoke and Deane £199,850.00 Bath and North East Somerset £417,151.00 Bedford £986,915.00 Birmingham £684,666.00 Blackburn with Darwen Hyndburn BC £184,000.00 Ribble Valley BC Burnley BC Pendle BC Rossendale BC Blackpool £200,000.00 Bolton £124,997.00 Boston £385,451.00 Bournemouth, Christchurch and £1,401,333.00 Poole Bracknell Forest £356,141.00 Bradford £461,320.00 Breckland £106,500.00 Brent £827,422.00 Brighton and Hove £2,042,637.00 Bristol, City of £2,814,768.00 Bromley £103,654.00 Broxbourne £119,380.00 Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Vale £576,500.00 Wycombe Chiltern South Bucks Bury £40,000.00 Calderdale £253,945.00 Cambridge £486,457.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £229,500.00 Camden £1,327,000.00 Canterbury £584,739.00 Carlisle (lead for all Cumbrian Allerdale Borough Council £416,340.00 authorities) Barrow Borough Council Carlisle City Council Copeland Borough Council Cumbria County Council Eden District Council South Lakeland District Council Central Bedfordshire £329,938.00 Cheshire East £438,329.30 Cheshire West and Chester £731,034.00 Chichester £230,465.00 City of London £590,300.00 Colchester £296,144.00 Corby East Northamptonshire £113,000.00 Kettering Wellingborough Cornwall £1,696,467.00 County Durham £269,128.35
    [Show full text]
  • Application No
    Date: 11/06/2021 Page 1 Mole Valley District Council Applications Registered Application Ref: MO/2021/0672/PLAH Link Location: 71, Links Road, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2HL Proposal: Erection of single storey rear extension, new porch, garage conversion and new pitched roof to existing first floor dormer. Case Officer: Sue James Registration Date: 03-Jun-2021 Applicant Name: Mr N Herbert Ward: Ashtead Common PSH/Area: Ashtead (Unparished) Application Ref: MO/2021/0883/CAT Link Location: The Old Parsonage, Dene Road, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1ED Proposal: Cut back branches of one Robinia tree to boundary line with 11, Berry Walk, Ashtead. Case Officer: Ron Howe Registration Date: 04-Jun-2021 Applicant Name: Mrs Gillian Coombes Ward: Ashtead Park PSH/Area: Ashtead (Unparished) Application Ref: MO/2021/0899/CC Link Location: City Of London Freemens School, Park Lane, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1ET Proposal: Variation of condition 2 of approved planning permission MO/2018/1487 for internal and external alterations, refurbishment and associated works to include new dining hall and Orangery roofs, new energy centre and district heating network pipe and landscaping works. (Application for Listed Building Consent), to allow development in accordance with revised plans FMH-HBA-ZZ-01-DR-A-42-0136 (Rev P01); FMH-HBA-ZZ-01-DR-A-42-0137 (Rev P01); FMH-HBA-ZZ-01-DR-A-42-0138 (Rev P01); and FMH-HBA-ZZ-01-DR-A-42-0139 (Rev P01). Case Officer: Sherelle Munnis Registration Date: 11-May-2021 Applicant Name: City of London Corporation Ward: Ashtead Park PSH/Area: Ashtead (Unparished) Date: 11/06/2021 Page 2 Mole Valley District Council Applications Registered Application Ref: MO/2021/0845/TFC Link Location: 3, West Farm Drive, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2LB Proposal: T1 - Oak - reduce to previous reduction points.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting 35 Local Growth Fund Risk Register
    Annex 006- Coast to Capital LGF Risk Register Dashboard Overall Risk Total LGF Project Approval Target Brief Description of Reasoning behind No Project Name Growth Deal Investment Theme Lead Delivery Body Rating allocation all years status Completion Date Risk Score (out of 25) 47 Gatwick Skills GD1 Skill TBC £4,706,959 Not yet approved TBC 22.0 Project under review. C2C will be organising an independent review on this project, which in turn will Business Case in 52 Gatwick Railway Station GD2 Transport Network Rail £10,000,000 TBC Under Review assess which risk category it falls into. Development Business case in development. Flex of 991,245 being reported in 17/18, plus just over 3.6mil of LGF. Project 13 Preston Barracks CRL GD1 Urban Regeneration Brighton & Hove City Council £7,700,000 Delivering Q4 18/19 19.0 experiencing planning delays. Match and outputs still being reported/monitored C2C will be organising an independent review on this project, which in turn will assess which risk category it falls into. Brighton Valley Gardens Phase 51 GD1 Transport Brighton & Hove City Council £6,000,000 Not yet approved TBC Under Review 3 Development of phase 3, is dependant on phases 1+2 - business case will come forward towards the end of phase 1+2 project. Project under review. New scheme to be 3 Business Finance GD1 Business Support / Space Under Review £3,212,822 Under Review TBC 18.0 launched later in the year. C2C will be organising an independent review on this project, which in turn will Newhaven Port Access Road DFT Retained assess which risk category it falls into.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole-Valley-Leaflet.Pdf
    Telecare Services (Including Community Alarm) Supporting independence and peace of mind at home This service is brought to you by Mole Valley District Council, installing and monitoring in Mole Valley and Reigate and Banstead areas Emergency Alarm Button What is Telecare? What are the benefits of the Telecare Service? Telecare is the name given to a range of equipment that can be used to summon A friendly, quick and professional help in emergency situations; raising alerts response to all calls received manually or automatically. The equipment A useful aid for added security is designed to assist vulnerable people to live more independently by monitoring A wide range of additional sensors safety around the home. can be linked to the alarm unit to provide you with extra safeguards The basic package consists of an alarm unit, Enables users to remain independent incorporating an emergency button, and a at home in the knowledge that help pendant worn around your neck or wrist. The can be called upon at any time if required pendant works even if you are in a different room to the main unit or in your garden Equipment is versatile and can be (approx 80-100 ft from the base unit). An tailored to your requirements adaptor is also available that allows those Facilitate early and safer discharge with limited strength/movement to operate from hospital or reducing hospital the pendant. admission Help at the touch of a button Automatic alerts can be sent from additional 24-hours/365 days of the year equipment such as a smoke alarm, fall Installation can be arranged within detector, bed/chair sensor, gas detector, 24hours of referral where possible flood detector or pill dispenser.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome Back Fund Allocations
    Welcome Back Fund Allocations Local Authority Allocation of £56 Million Adur £121,721 Allerdale £186,416 Amber Valley £113,425 Arun £208,718 Ashfield £114,528 Ashford £116,815 Babergh £146,635 Barking And Dagenham £189,384 Barnet £352,546 Barnsley £219,400 Barrow-in-Furness £158,859 Basildon £165,814 Basingstoke And Deane £155,751 Bassetlaw £104,654 Bath And North East Somerset £172,615 Bedford £154,129 Bexley £220,176 Birmingham £1,016,936 Blaby £91,483 Blackburn with Darwen £131,610 Blackpool £222,771 Bolsover £71,400 1 Local Authority Allocation of £56 Million Bolton £253,140 Boston £62,811 Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole £416,323 Bracknell Forest £108,686 Bradford £477,170 Braintree £134,418 Breckland £125,275 Brent £295,908 Brentwood £67,383 Brighton And Hove £324,269 Bristol £415,785 Broadland £116,155 Bromley £295,178 Bromsgrove £88,668 Broxbourne £85,548 Broxtowe £101,459 Buckinghamshire Council £481,588 Burnley £78,758 Bury £169,235 Calderdale £186,099 Cambridge £110,675 Camden £239,768 Cannock Chase £89,623 Canterbury £211,700 2 Local Authority Allocation of £56 Million Carlisle £95,875 Castle Point £144,835 Central Bedfordshire £255,873 Charnwood £165,450 Chelmsford £159,001 Cheltenham £103,578 Cherwell £133,843 Cheshire East £339,534 Cheshire West and Chester £370,395 Chesterfield £92,638 Chichester £173,161 Chorley £105,438 City of London £30,000 Colchester £239,003 Copeland £159,920 Corby £64,668 Cornwall £609,639 Cotswold £81,144 Coventry £334,308 Craven £50,436 Crawley £100,153 Croydon £341,995 Dacorum £137,473 Darlington
    [Show full text]