Local Government Boundary Commission For Report No. 4^ 7 LOCAL GOTEEDMHT

BOUNDARY OOJMISSION

FOR ENGLAND

REPORT NO. ^" 3 7 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNMHY COMMISSIOH FOR ENGLAND

CHAIBMAH Mr G J Ellerton CMS MBE

IEPTJTT CHATRMAN Sir Wilfred Burns CB CBE

MEMBERS Lftdj Ackner

Mr T BrockUnk DL

Mr D P Harrison

Professor G E Cherry T3I1 3T. HCS. PATRICK J2KKIN UP SECRETARY OF STATE ?03 THE EKVI30KK2IT

*. In their review report subnitted to us on 16 June iV80f Council suggested changes to parts of ths boundary between the Borough, of Cuildford ?.r.d the of Heath, Poking and Elmbridge, and Districts of Hole Valley and T7averley in the Coi-nty of Surrey, and the Borough of 3ushmoor in the County of Hacipahire in the following parishad and unparished areas:-

Ash Parish, Guildford/ Borough Parish, Guildford/Surroy Eeath Borough Pirbright Parish, Guildi'ord/tfokinc Borough Ockha-n Parisii, Guildfcrd/Elcbridge Borough Effin^haa Parish, Guildford/r.role Valley District East I'.orsley Parish, Guildford/ Parish, Kole Valley Parish, Guildford/Abinter Parish, Hole Valley Shere Parish, Guildford/Ev/hurst Parish, Vfaverley District Albury Parish, Cuildford/V.'onersh Parish, V/averley r:halfor;l parish, Guildford/Bcamley Parish, TTaverley Shalford Parish, Guildford/ Parish, 77averley Coinpton Parish, Guildford/Godalmir.g Parish, '.V-: verley Parish, Guildford/Goclaiming Parish, i7a*/erley

ShaclQeford Parish, Guildford/ Parish, ";7averley Seale and Parish, Guildford/ Parisl;, /teverley Seale and Toafjham Parish, GuildTord/ Parish, VTaverley Seale and Tonghaa Parish, Guildford/7averley District Ash Parish, Guilclford, Surrey/Rushooor Borough, Eaapshlre

^ ;2. In the Effingham CP, Cuildford/L:ol3 Vslley boundary area, Guildford Borough Council 3u>_r;9sted thit houses opposite jlffinghc^:. village or. the "ole Valley sido cf the boundary should be brought within..Effi.'i£hain ;?-arish bac^use cf a cordon cocaunity of intorast; for the remaining areas, they nurgected minor alterations to create more, satisfactory administrative boundaries.

3- V.'e considered Guildford Borough Council's request, as required by Section 45(5) of the Local Government Act 1972, having regard to the Department of the Environment Circular 33/7? and our Report :To. 287- 4. We had before us the 'Views of all the and district councils concerned with the changes suggested in the various areas and of Surrey and County Councils. In the absence of general agreement on the necessity of carrying out a review of the boundary between Guildford Borough in Surrey and Borough in Hampshire, we were not satisfied we had sufficient justification for embarking on an ad hoc review in advance of the review of county boundaries during the period after 1984 for which the Act provides. For the remainder we decided that we should undertake a review, and that the circumstances were sufficiently exceptional to enable us to shorten our normal procedure by publishing draft proposals at the time time as we formally announced our intention to carry out a review.

5. We based our draft proposals on Guildford Borough Council's submission in all j • *-i areas except one which is dealt with"below. In three instances however this involved, on the advice of Ordnance Survey, extending Guildford Borough Council's suggested area fox alteration into adjacent par i shed or as follows:-

Pitfbri^it CP, Guildford/ Borough extended into CP, Guildford Seale and Tongham CP, Guildford/Tilford CP, Waverley extended into Waverley District CP, Guildford/ extended into Wotton CP, Mole Valley

In respect of the one exception the Albury CP (Guildford)/ (Waverley) boundary, we adopted the alternative boundary suggested by Wonersh Parish Council.

6. On 7 October 1982, we issued a consultation letter announcing the start of the review and giving details of our draft proposals. The letter was addressed to Guildford Borough Council and copies were sent to , Surrey Heath, Woking and Elmbridge Borough Councils. and Mole Valley and Waverley District Councils, the parish councils concerned, MPs of the constituencies concerned, headquarters of the main political parties, local newspapers circulating in the areas concerned and the local government press. The district councils were asked to publish a notice announcing the start of the review and the publication of the draft proposals, and to place copies of it on display at places where public notices were customarily displayed; they were also asked to place copies of the draft proposals on deposit at their main offices for a period of six weeks.

7. Copies of our letters were also sent to and Rushraoor Borough Council in that county. RESPONSE TO TITS DRAFT PROPOSALS 8. In response to the publication of our draft proposals we received letters from Surrey County Council, the Borou^i Councils of Elmbridge, Guildford, Surrey Heath and 7'oking, Mole Valley District Council, Godalming Town Council, the Parish Councils of Effin^iara, Elstead, flitley and vYotton, the Thames '.Vater Authority, the Bookhams Residents' Association and several private individuals.

9. The Borough Councils of Elmbridge and Surrey Heath supported our draft proposals as they affected their boundaries. Surrey County Council, Woking Borough Council, and the Thames ^Tater Authority had no comments to make. All the comments received referred to draft proposals affecting the boundary between the , and the Districts of Mole Valley and "tfaverley. a. Mole Valley District 10. All the representations except three concerned the Effingham/(Bookham) Mole Valley boundary.

11. Effin^iam Parish Council had felt for some years that this particular boundary change was necessary as properly reflecting community ties and known wishes of some of ,the affected residents.

12. Mole Valley District Council argued strongly that the transfer of this area would split the historical village of and would involve a loss of rateable value. The Council had also conducted a poll in the area which indicated that the majority of the residents affected by the draft proposal objected to it.

13. Wotton Parish Council opposed the part of our draft proposals which affected their boundary. As explained in our letter of 7 October 1982 announcing the draft proposals, this area was incorporated at Ordnance Survey's suggestion; it was of no consequence to the main proposals and no electorate was involved.

14. The Bookhams Residents' Association were also opposed to our draft proposals for the same reasons as Mole Valley District Council.

15. Sixteen letters were received from residents affected by the proposal. Of these two supported our draft proposal whereas the other fourteen voiced strong objections. Amongst the reasons given for their objections were ties with Bookham and Mole Valley, historical boundaries, higher rates in Guildford, additional parish precept in Effingham, and a supposedly consequential change in postal address. t>- Waverley District 16. Godalming Town Council welcomed, and Elstead Parish Council had no objections to our draft proposals insofar as they affected the district boundary in their respective areas.

17. Witley Parish Council opposed the minor realignment of the district boundary which split properties between the ->hackleford/Witley parishes. They suggested instead that the boundary should be realigned in the opposite direction, so that three adjacent cottages in Shackleford were transferred to their area as they were part of Milford village. They did not, however, specify the actual line the new boundary should follow.

18. We reassessed our draft proposals in the light of the representations we received and the alternatives put forward. We noted that only two of our draft proposals had been opposed, affecting the Guildford/Mole Valley boundary in the area adjoining the parish of Effingham (proposal 4c) and the Guildford/V.'averley boundary in the area of the parishes of Shackleford and "flitley (proposal 5j)- In the light of the number of representations received and the strength of the opposition to the changes, we decided that we would not proceed with these two draft proposals as published. However, rather than formulating final proposals immediately, based on alternative suggestions made in the representations, we decided to publish revised draft proposals to allow the opportunity of further public comment, ^'hese revised draft proposals involved the exclusion of the small area of '.Votton Parish from the Effingfaam, Guildford/(Bookham)/Wotton, Mole Valley transfer and the adoption of an alternative boundary suggested by V/itley Parish Council for the Shackleford, Guildford/7?itley, Waver ley area.

19. We published our revised draft proposals on 22 April 1923. Copies were sent to all those who had received our original draft proposals letter or who had since made representations to us.

RESPONSE TO T!£ REVISED DRAFT PROPOSALS 20. In response to the publication of our revised draft proposals, we received letters from Surrey County Council, Guildford Borough Council, Mole Valley and Waver ley District Councils, Effingham and Shackleford Parish Councils, the Bookhams Residents' Association and two private individuals. a. Effingham, Guildford/(Bookham)/Vtotton, Mole Valley (proposal 4c) 21. Surrey County Council had no comments to make.

22. Mole Valley District Council confirmed their earlier objections to the proposed boundary change (paragraph 14 refers).

23. Effingham Parish Council raised no objections.

24. The Bcokhams Residents1 Association were completely opposed to the revised draft proposal as they were to the original, and for the same reasons (paragraph 16 refers). ,25-' Of the two private individuals who made representations; one supported the revised draft proposal and the other objected tc it.

"b. Shackleford, Guildford/Witley. Waverley (proposal 26: Surrey County Council felt that although the boundary change would bo of tio great consequence for the administration of County services, justjfication for it in torras of electoral consequences was questionable. They also stated that the residents of the three h^jses involved had strong ties with Shackleford and wished to remain within that parish. -

27'. G'uildford Borough 'Council opposed the revised draft proposal and supported the views1 expressed My the County Council.

28. Waverley District 'Council had no objections to the proposal.

29- Shackleford Parish Council objected strongly to the proposal for the same reasons as Surrey County Council. OTCLUSIONS 30. TTe have reassessed our revised draft proposals in the light of the representations we received. In regard to the Guildford/Mole Valley proposal, we noted that although there had been further representations, the adverse reaction was to the central feature of the original draft proposal, not to the exclusion of the area of Wot ton Parish. As no new arguments or '.fresh information about the wishes of the residents had been advanced, we have concluded that we should adhere to our revised draft proposal.

31. Our other revised drp.ft proposal affecting the Guildford/'V averley boundary was objected to by Surrey County Council, Guildford Borough Council and Shackleford Parish Council but none' of the occupants of the three houses affected made any representations. tie have concluded, however, that the consensus of opposition reflected by the attitudes of the County Council, Guildford Borough Council and Shackleford Parish Council left uc no real alternative1 but to revert to our original proposal for this area.

32. tfe have decided, therefore, in the interests of effective and convenient local government to make ouu final proposals to the Secretary of State in accordance with our original draft proposals, except in the "uildford/Mole Valley area where we have adopted our revised draft proposal 4c.

33. -Details of .these final proposals are set out in Schedules 1, 2 and 3 to this report. Schedule 1 specifies -the proposed changes in Iccal authority areas and Schedules 2 and 3 specify the consequential adjustments to the existing electoral arrangements. The proposed boundaries are shov/n on the attached caps. PUBLICATION 34- Separate letters ore being seat with copies of the report and of the large scale maps to Surrey County Council and Guildford Borough Council, and (without the raaps) to Surrey Heath, Woking and Elmbridge Borough Councils and KoiU Valley and V/averley District Councils, asking them to place copies of thlo report on deposit at their main offices, and to put notices to this effect on public notice boards iuid :n the local press. The text of the notices v;ill refer to your pcwor to make an Order implementing the proposals, if you think fit, after the expiry of six v/eeks from the da-to they aro submitted to you; it will suggest that any comments en the proposalu should therefore be addressed to you in writingf preferably withinnix weeks of the date of the letter. Copies of this report which includes small scale m;;ps arc also being sent to Hampshire County Council, Rushmoc-r 3orough Council and these who received the consultation letter and to those who made comments. L.G.

Signed: G J ELLEHTON (Chairman)

vniJ^HL BCR^S (Deputy Chairman)

JO M; ACKNE3

TY3RELL

G E CEERHY

D F lUHHISOTi1

L 3 CHIKSHA^ Secretary 1983

6f LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

PRINCIPAL AREAS BOUNDARY REVIEW

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD/BOROUGH OF SURREY HEATH//BOROUGH OF ELM3RIDGE/MOLE VALLEY DISTKICT/WAVERLEY DISTRICT

Note: Where the boundary is described as following a road, railway, river, canal or similar feature, it shall be deemed to follow the centre line of the feature, unless otherwise stated.

Schedule 1

1. Boundary realignments between the Borough of Guildford and the

Borough of Surrey Heath.

Proposal 1a: that the boundary between Ash CP in the Borough of Guildford

and the Borough of Surrey Heath shall be realigned as

described below.

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and the Borough of Surrey Heath at NG Reference 886865^196, as shown on OS

1:1250 Microfilm (E) SU 885^ SE, date of publication 197^, thence eastwards in a straight line from said reference point to the southernmost corner of the Caravan Site at Grove Farm, thence northeastwards along the south- eastern boundary of said caravan site to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 1b: that the boundary between Ash CP in the Borough of Guildford

and the Borough of Surrey Heath shall be realigned as

described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of

Guildford and the Borough of Surrey Heath meets the southern end of the access road on the southeastern side of Lake, thence northwest- wards along the southern end of said access road to the southeastern boundary of Mytchett Lake, thence generally northeastwards along said south-

eastern boundary to the point at which it meet?, tho existing boundary,

thence northeastwards in a straight line from said point bo rejoin the

existing boundary at NG Reference 396V75V+26, as shown on OS 1:2500 Micro-

film (A1) SU 895^, date of publication March 1978, being a point on the

southern side of Mytchett Place Road.

Proposal 1c: that the boundary between Pirbright CP in the Borough of

Guildford and the Borough of Surrey Heath shall be

realigned as described belov;.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of

Guildford and the Borough of Surrey Heath meets the southern boundary of the Woking-Hook Railway, thence northeastwards in a straight line from said point to the southeastern corner of the property known as Heather- hurst Grange, thence northwards along the southeastern curtilage of said property to its northernmost point, thence northeastwards in a straight line from said point to rejoin the existing boundary at NG Reference

9109556979, as shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) SU 915&, date of publi- cation 1975.

2. Boundary realignments between the Borough of Guildford and the

Borough of Woking.

Proposal 2a: that the boundary between Pirbright CP in the Borough of

Guildford and the Borough of Woking shall be realigned as

described below.

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and the Borough of V/oking at the northernmost corner of Parcel Ho 7855, as 3 shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) SU 9^56» ^ate of publication 19?2, thence

southeastwards, northeastwards and southeastwards along the western boundary of'sairi Parcel and northeastwards along the southeastern boundary of said

Parcel to its easternmost point, thence southeastwards along the field boundary leading southeastwards from said easternmost point to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 2b: that the boundary between Pirbright CP in the Borough of

Guildford and the Borough of Woking shall be realigned as

described below.

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and the Borough of Woking at the northernmost corner of Parcel Mo 3^931 as shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) SU 9555, date of publication 19?2, thence southeastwards along the northeastern boundary of said Parcel and south- westwards along the southeastern boundary of said Parcel to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 2c: that the boundary between Pirbright CP in the Borough of

Guildford and the Borough of Woking shall be realigned as

described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and the Borough of Woking meets the northeastern curtilage of the property known as Sakura, thence southeastwards along said curtilage and the northeastern curtilages of the properties known as Oakdene and

Lonnen to the northern curtilage of the property known as Tangles, thence eastwards along said northern curtilage to the western curtilage of the property known as Crosswinds, thence southwards along said western 4 curtilage to the southern curtilage of said property, thence northeast- wards along said southern curtilage to its easternmost point, thence due east from said point, across the A 322 road, to the eastern boundary of said road, thence southwards along said eastern boundary and southeast- wards along the eastern boundary of the A321 road to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 2d: that the boundary between Warplesden CP in the Borough of

Guildford and the Borough of Woking shall be realigned as

described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and the Borough of Woking crosses the eastern boundary of the A321 road, northwest of Rickford Mill, thence southeastwards along the eastern boundary of said road to the unnamed stream forming the north- western boundary of Parcel No 5366, as shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) SU 965^» date of publication 1973, thence northeastwards along said unnamed stream to rejoin the existing boundary.

3. Boundary realignments between the Borough of Guildford and the

Borough of Elmbridge.

Proposal 3a: that the boundary .between Ockham CP in the Borough of

Guildford and the shall be realigned

as described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and the Borough of Elmbridge crosses the western boundary of

Horsley Road, at Bull Riding Farm, thence southwards along said western boundary to a point opposite the northern boundary of Parcel No 6520, as 5 shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) TQ 1057, date of publication 1973, thence

eastwards to and along said parcel boundary to the southeastern boundary

of Ockhara CP, thence northwards along said CP boundary to rejoin the

existing boundary.

4. Boundary realignments between the Borough of Guildford and Mole

Valley District.

Proposal *fa: that the boundary between Effingham CP in the Borough of

Guildford and Mole Valley District shall be realigned as

described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and Mole Valley District meets the northern boundary of

Parcel No OOJ7, ae shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) TQ 115^, date of publication 1970, thence eastwards along said-Parcel boundary to the eastern boundary of said Parcel, thence southeastwards along said eastern boundary, continuing on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) TQ 125*f, date of publi- cation 1970, and the eastern boundary of Parcel No 0025 to the north- western curtilage of the property known as The Vineries, thence northwards along said northwestern curtilage and eastwards, southeastwards, south- westwards and southeastwards along the northern and northeastern curtilages of said property and the northeastern curtilage of the property known as Vineries Bungalow to rejoin the existing boundary in

Lower Road.

Proposal A-b: that the boundary between Effingham CP in the Borough of

Guildford and Mole Valley District shall be realigned as

described below. 6 Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough

of Guildford and Mole Valley District crosses the northwestern boundary of

The Manor House School for Girls, thence southwestwards along said north-

western boundary and southeastwards along the northeastern boundary of

King George's Field (recreation ground) to the northern curtilage of the

property known as Dowsland Cottage, thence northeastwards along said

northern curtilage and in prolongation thereof to the eastern boundary of

Mahorhou'se Lane, thence southwestwards along said eastern boundary to

rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal *fc: that the boundary between Effingham CP in the Borough of Guildford and the non parished area of the Mole Valley District, shall be realigned as described below

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of

Guildford and Mole Valley District meets the northern boundary of Guildford

Road, thence eastwards and northeastwards along said northern boundary to a point opposite NG Reference 1279353569. as shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A1)

TQ1253* date of publication Dec 1980, thence southeastwards from said point to said reference being a point on the eastern boundary of Chalkpit Lane, v thence generally southeastwards along said boundary and its continuation as the field boundaries forming the eastern boundary of Chalkpit Lane (track) and continuing southeastwards along the western boundary of Parcel No 1300, as shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) TQ1353, date of publication 1971 and OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) TQ1352, date of publication 1970 to the western boundary of

Parcel No 2800, thence southwards along said Parcel boundary to its southern- most point, thence southeastvards in a straight line from said point to the southeastern side of Hogden Lane (track), thence southwards, southwestwards and southwards along the southeastern side of said lane and its continuation as Hogden Lane (path) to the northern boundary of Wotton CP, thence generally westwards along said CP boundary to rejoin the existing District boundary. Proposal 4d: that the boundary between CP in the Borough

of Guildford and Abinger CP in Mole Valley District shall

be realigned as described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough

of Guildford and Mole Valley District meets the eastern curtilage of the property known as The Hermitage, thence southwestwards along said eastern

curtilage to the southern curtilage of said property, thence northwest- wards along said southern curtilage and continuing northwestwards, westwards and southwestwards along the northern boundary of Sheepwalk

Lane to a point opposite NG Reference 0978550207, as shown on OS 1:2500

Microfilm (A) TQ 0950, date of publication 1973* thence southeastwards

from said point, across Sheepwalk Lane, to said reference, being a point on the existing boundary.

Proposal ^e: that the boundary between Shere CP in the Borough of

Guildford and Abinger CP in Mole Valley District shall be

realigned as described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of

Guildford and Mole Valley District crosses the eastern boundary of Holmbury

Hill Road at the property known as Joldwynds, thence southwards, south- westwards, northwestwards and westwards along said eastern boundary and the southern boundary of said road to the existing boundary between

Waverley District and Mole Valley District, thence westwards along said existing District boundary to rejoin the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and Mole Valley

District. 5- Boundary realignments between the Borough of Guildford and Waverley District.

Proposal 5a: that the boundary between Shere CP in the Borough of Guildford and Ewhurst CP in Waverley District shall be realigned as described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and Waverley District crosses the southwestern boundary of Ewhurst Road, at the easternmost point of Parcel No 898*+, as shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) TQ 08V5i date of publication 197^, thence northwest- wards along the southwestern boundary of Ewhurst Road to a point in line

with the southeastern curtilage of No 3 Gasson Cottages, thence south- westwards to and along said southeastern curtilage and northwestwards along the northern boundary of Parcel No 9080 to the northwestern boundary of said Parcel, thence southwestwards along said Parcel boundary and the northwestern boundary of Parcel No 8581 to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 5b: that the boundary between Albury CP in the Borough of Guildford and Wonersh CP in Waverley District shall be realigned as described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and Waverley District crosses the western boundary of Green Lane, west of Parcel No 71^9, as shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) TQ 04^5, date of publication 1972, thence northeastwards and northwestwards along the western boundary of said lane to rejoin the existing boundary. Proposal 5c: that the boundary between Shalford CP in the Borough of

Guildford and Bramley CP in Waverley District shall be

realigned as described below.

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford

and Waverley District at the northwestern boundary of Parcel No 70$?, as

shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) SU 99^, date of publication 197^, thence

northeastwards along said Parcel boundary to the western boundary of

Foxborough Hill Road, thence southwards along said western boundary to

the northern boundary of the Path (urn) to the north of the property known

as Foxbury Hill, thence westwards along the northern boundary of said

Path (urn) to a point opposite the northeastern corner of Parcel No 3^5»

thence southwards from said point to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 5d: that the boundary between Shalford CP in the Borough of

Guildford and Godalming CP in Waverley District shall be

realigned as described below.

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and

Waverley District at a point opposite the easternmost corner of No 11

Perry Close, thence northwestwards to and westwards along the northern

curtilage of said property and the northern curtilages of No's 10 and

9 Perry Close to the northeastern curtilage of No 8 Perry Close,thence northwestwards along said northeastern curtilage and in prolongation 10 thereof to the eastern curtilage of No 20 Overbrqok, thence northeastwards along said eastern curtilage and northwestwards along the northeastern curtilage of said property to the eastern curtilage of No 19 Overbrook, thence northwards along said eastern curtilage to the rear curtilage of said property, thence northwestwards along said rear curtilage and the rear curtilages of No's 18-10 Overbrook to the northwestern curtilage of the last-mentioned property, thence southwestwards along said northwestern curtilage to the rear curtilage of No 9 Overbrook, thence northwestwards along said rear curtilage to the eastern boundary of the Depot in Wey

Road, thence northwards along said eastern boundary and in prolongation thereof to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 5e: that the boundary between Compton CP in the Borough of

Guildford and Godalming CP in Waverley District shall be

realigned as described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of

Guildford and Waverley District crosses the southwestern boundary of The

Avenue, thence southeastwards along said southwestern boundary to the eastern curtilage of the property known as Rosetree Cottage, thence south- westwards and southeastwards along said eastern curtilage and southwest- wards, northwestwards and southwestwards along the southeastern curtilage of said property to rejoin the. existing boundary at the southwestern curtilage of No 1V? Binscombe.

Proposal 5f: that'the boundary between Compton CP in i the Borough of Guildford and Godalming CP in Waverley District shall be

realigned as described below. 11

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and

Waverley District at the eastern curtilage of the property known as

Barberries, thence southwards along said eastern curtilage to the southern

curtilage of said property, thence northwestwards and westwards along said

southern curtilage and the southern curtilages of the properties known as

Pilgrims Ridge, The Glade, Robinswood, Bavins and Squirrels Run to the

Bouthwesternmost point of the last-mentioned property, thence due north-

west from said point to the southeastern curtilage of the property known

as Broomfield Manor, thence southwestwards along said southeastern

curtilage and the southeastern curtilage of the property known as Wynton to the southernmost corner of the last-mentioned property, thence south-

wards in a straight line to the northernmost corner of the property known

as Stoneycroft, thence southwestwards along the northwestern curtilage of

said property and the northwestern curtilage of the property known as

Brambles to the southwestern curtilage of the last-mentioned property, thence southeastwards along said southwestern curtilage to the northern

boundary of Hurtmore Road, thence westwards along said northern boundary

to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 5gi that the boundary between Shackleford CP in the Borough

of Guildford and Godalming CP in Waverley District shall

be realigned as described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and Waverley District crosses the northeastern curtilage of

the property known as Halfway House, thence eastwards along said north-

eastern curtilage and southwestwards along the southeastern curtilage of

said property to rejoin the existing boundary. 12

Proposal 5h: that the boundary between Shackleford CP in the Borough of

Guildford and Godalming CP in Waverley District shall be

realigned as described below. „, ,!t-,. .*

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of

Guildford and Waverley District meets the rear curtilage of No 1? Aaron's

Hill, thence southwestwards along said rear curtilage, the rear curtilages

of No's 15-1 Aaron1s Hill and the northern boundary of the area of land to

the north of No's 62-67 Eashing Lane to the western boundary of said area

of land, thence southeastwards along said western boundary, the western

curtilage of No 6? Bashing Lane, its continuation southeastwards to Eashing

Lane and in prolongation thereof to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 5j: that the boundary between Shackleford CP in the Borough of

Guildford and Witley CP in Waverley District shall be

realigned as described below.

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and

Waverley District at the southeastern curtilage of the property known as

Dargle Cottage, thence southwestwards along said southeastern curtilage to

its southernmost point, thence northwestwards in a straight line from said

point to the southernmost corner of the property known as Fowle Hatch

Cottage, thence northwestwards along the southwestern curtilage and north-

eastwards along the northwestern curtilage of said property to rejoin the

existing boundary.

Proposal 5k: that the boundary between Seale and Tongham CP in the Borough

of Guildford and Elstead CP in Waverley District shall be

realigned as described below. 13

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of

Guildford and Waverley District crosses the southern boundary of Little- worth Road, east of the property known as Whitefield House, thence westwards along the southern boundary of said road to rejoin the existing boundary, at the northernmost corner of Whitefield House.

Proposal 51: that the boundary between Seale and Tongham CP in the Borough

of Guildford and Elstead CP in Waverley District shall be

realigned as described below.

Commencing at the point where the existing boundary between the Borough of

Guildford and Waverley District crosses the western boundary of Seale Road

(LA name)^ being the eastern boundary of Parcel No 5933i as shown on OS

1:2500 Microfilm (A) SU 89^5, date of publication 197^, thence southwards along said Parcel boundary and northwestwards along the southwestern boundary of said Parcel to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 5m: that the boundary between Seale and Tongham CP in the

Borough of Guildford and Tilford CP in Waverley District

and the boundary between Seale and Tongham CP in the

Borough of Guildford and the unparished area of Waverley

District shall be realigned as described below.

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and

Waverley District at the northern curtilage of the property known as

Bracken House, thence northwestwards along said northern curtilage to its junction with the northwestern curtilage of said property, thence north- wards in a straight line to the easternmost corner of the property known as Amberley, thence northwestwards along the northeastern curtilage of said property to the northwestern boundary of Tilford CP, thence north- 14 eastwards along said CP boundary and the northwestern curtilage of the

property known as Binton Barn Cottage to a point opposite the southernmost

corner of Parcel No 5648, as shown on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) SU 8746, date

of publication 197**, thence northwestwards to and northwestwards and north-

wards along the southwestern and western boundaries of said Parcel to the

southern curtilage of the property known as April Cottage, thence west-

wards along said southern curtilage to rejoin the existing boundary.

Proposal 5n: that the boundary between Seale and Tongham CP in the Borough

of Guildford and Waverley District shall be realigned as

described below. ,

Commencing on the existing boundary between the Borough of Guildford and

Waverley District at the southernmost corner of Parcel No 5886, as shown

on OS 1:2500 Microfilm (A) SU 8?4?, date of publication 1974, thence

northwestwards in a straight line to the northeasternmost point of Parcel

No 5377t thence westwards along the northern boundary of said Parcel to

the northwestern corner of said Parcel, thence due north to the northern

curtilage of the property known as Galedon End, thence eastwards along

said northern curtilage and southwards along the eastern curtilage of said property to rejoin the existing boundary.

Schedule 2

Revised District electoral arrangements, consequent upon the boundary realingments described in Schedule 1.

1. It is proposed that the District Wards, as defined in the Borough of Guildford (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1975 and the Borough of Surrey Heath (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1975, shall be realigned as described below. 15

Proposal 1a: that the boundary between the Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Mytchett Ward of the Borough of Surrey Heath shall be realigned as described in Proposal 1a and Proposal 1b in Schedule 1.

Proposal 1b: that the boundary between the Pirbright Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Green Ward of the Borough of Surrey Heath shall be realigned as described in Proposal 1c in Schedule 1.

2. It is proposed that .the District Wards, as defined in the Borough of Guildford (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1975 and the Borough of Woking (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1976, shall be altered as described below.

Proposal 2a: that the boundary between the Pirbright Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Brookwood Ward of the Borough of Woking shall be realinged as described in Proposal 2a, Proposal 2b and Proposal 2c in Schedule 1.

Proposal 2b: that the boundary between the Worplesdon Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Brookwood Ward of the Borough of Woking shall be realigned as described in Proposal 2d in Schedule 1,

3. It is proposed that the District Wards, as defined in the Borough of Guildford (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1975 and the Borough of Elmbridge (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1975» shall be altered as described below.

Proposal 3a: that the boundary between the Lovelace Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Cobhara and Downside Ward of the Borough of Elmbridge shall be realigned as described in Proposal 3a in Schedule 1.

*f. It is proposed that the District Wards, as defined in the Borough of Guildford (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1975 and the District of Mole Valley (Electoral Arrangements)'Order 1975 [as amended by the Mole Valley (Parishes) Order 1981], shall be altered as described below.

Proposal A-a: that the boundary between the Effingham Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Bookham North Ward of Mole Valley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal *fa in Schedule 1.

Proposal 4b: that the boundary between the Effingham Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Bookham South Ward of Mole Valley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 4b in Schedule 1.

Proposal 4c: that the boundary between the Effingham Ward of the Borough of

Guildford and the Bookham South Ward of Mole Valley District

shall be realigned as described in Proposal *tC in Schedule 1.

Proposal 4d: that the boundary between the Clandon and Horsley Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Ward of Mole Valley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 4d in Schedule 1. Proposal be: that the boundary between the Tillingbourne Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Leith Hill Ward of Mole Valley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal be in Schedule 1.

5- It is proposed that the District Wards, as defined in the Borough of Guildford (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1975 and the District of Waverley (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1979 shall be altered as described below.

Proposal that the boundary between the Tillingbourne Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Ewhurst Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5a in Schedule 1.

Proposal 5b: that the boundary between the Tillingbourne Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Blackheath and Wonersh Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5b in Schedule 1.

Proposal 5c: that the boundary between the Shalford Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Bramley Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5c in Schedule 1.

Proposal that the boundary between the Shalford Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Godalming South East Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5d in Schedule 1.

Proposal 5e; that the boundary between The Pilgrims Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Godalming North West Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5e and Proposal 5f in Schedule 1.

Proposal 5f: that the boundary between The Pilgrims Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Godalming North East and South West Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5g and Proposal 5h in Schedule 1.

Proposal 5g: that the boundary between The Pilgrims Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Hilford Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5j in Schedule 1.

Proposal 5h; that the boundary between The Pilgrims Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Elstead, and Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5k and Proposal 51 in Schedule 1.

Proposal 5j that the boundary between The Pilgrims Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the , and Tilford Ward of Waverley District, and the boundary between The Pilgrims Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Waverley Ward of Waverley District shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5r° in Schedule 1.

Proposal 5k: that the boundary between the Tongham Ward of the Borough of Guildford and the Farnham Waverley Ward of Waverley District shall 'be realigned as described in Proposal 5n in Schedule 1. Schedule 3

Revised County electoral arrangements, consequent upon the boundary realignments described in Schedule 1.

1. It is proposed that the County Electoral Divisions, as defined in the County of Surrey (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1980, [as amended by the Mole Valley (Parishes) Order 1981] shall be altered as described below.

Proposal\1 ; i. that the boundary between the Ash ED and the and Mytchett ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal la and Proposal 1b in Schedule 1.

n. that the boundary between the Worplesdon ED and the Frimley Green and Mytchett ED shall be realigned as described-in Proposal 1c in Schedule 1.

Proposal 2 : that the boundary between the Worplesdon ED and the Woking South - West ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal 2a, Proposal 2b, Proposal 2c and Proposal 2d in Schedule 1.

Proposal 3i: that the boundary between the Horsleys ED and the Cobham and ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal ?a in Schedule 1. Proposal 4] : i. that the boundary between the Horsleys ED and Bookham and West ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal *fa and Proposal *fb in Schedule 1. il.. that the boundary between the Horsleys ED and the Bookham and Fetchara West ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal kc in Schedule 1. ill. that the boundary between the Horsleys ED and the North ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal *fd in Schedule 1. iv. that the boundary between the Shere ED and the Dorking North ED shall .be realigned as described in Proposal 4e in Schedule 1. Proposal 5': i. that the boundary between the Shere ED and the Waverley East ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5a and Proposal 5b in Schedule 1.

il. that the boundary between the Shalford ED and the Godalraing South and Rural ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5c and Proposal 5d in Schedule 1.

ill.that the boundary between the Shalford ED and the Godalming North ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5e, Proposal 5f, Proposal 5g and Proposal 5h in Schedule 1.

(V.that the boundary between the Shalford ED and the Waverley West ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5ji Proposal 5k and Proposal 51 in Schedule 1. 18 v. that the boundary between the Shalford ED and the Waverley West ED, and the boundary between the Shalford ED and the Farnham Central ED shall be realigned.as described in Proposal 5m in Schedule 1. vi. that the boundary between the Shalford ED and the Farnham Central ED shall be realigned as described in Proposal 5n in Schedule 1. PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW

LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

FINAL PROPOSAL

BOROUGH OF SURREY HEATH j BOROUGH OF SURREY HEATH

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD ASHCP ^ ! •\ : ASH CP o/v;

BOROUGH OF SURREY HEATH

=• BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD 3

EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY rown Copv"{jj,f PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW

LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

FINAL PROPOSAL

BOROUGH OF WOKING BOROUGH OF WOKING

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD •:'' * ~' PIRBRIGHT CF * - PIRBRtGHT CP ,

BOROUGH OF WOKING ;/ Proposals 2c42c

\> WARPLESDON CP

EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY EXISTING CP BOUNDARY Crown Copyi PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW

LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

FINAL PROPOSAL

MM. BOROUGH OF ELMBRIDGE

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD

OCKHAM CP

EAST HORSLEY CP

MOLE VALLEY DISTRICT

\ '«-».. Co...i i fht MIIKK M^uir Ich.HttlB' C.rli

MOLE VALLEY DISTRICT

Proposal 4b

-. • .<•.—»• BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD ?

EFFINGHAM CP

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD

EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY EXISTING CP BOUNDARY

©Crown Copvt'-j- ' i GUILDFORD \ ~ --.!!*•-. PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW .1 .v. 'Q$Q 4** ^T

LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

FINAL PROPOSAL

MOLE VALLEY DISTRICT

MOLE VALLEY BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD DISTRICT "'

EFFtNGHAM CP

r Proposal 4« -:;\ " ,'a

WAVERLEY DISTRICT MOLE VALLEY DISTRICT i^r;:^ EWHURST CP ABWGER CP ^ -., .,, . :AM**0

EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY EXISTING CP BOUNDARY PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY & EXISTING CP BOUNDARY. C)Cro«m Cooyrigni 1983 PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW

LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

FINAL PROPOSAL

/\ \\ -•- • BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD ALBURY CP **'* SHERE CP 5o

WAVERLEY DISTRICT WAVERLEY DISTRICT

. EWHURST CP WONERSH CP

\

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD ^

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD

SHALFORD CP

i°V . ^^ WAVERLEY DISTRICT j-^ii3R\

—•' A -^-^ GODALMING CP -, -••'"^y :C^:^£^:-^ £>- .> Qs.

EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY ©Crown CoPY'i" PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION COMPTON CP FOR ENGLAND

FINAL PROPOSAL

WAVERLEY DISTRICT BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD GODALMING CP '• COMPTON Cl

WAVERLEY DISTRICT BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD u GODALMING CP SHACKLEFORD CP

WAVERLEY DISTRICT

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD GODALMING CP

SHACKLEFORD CP Proposal 5g

EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY WAVERLEY DISTRICT PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY EXISTING CP BOUNDARY GODALMING CP

©Crown Copyrlgnt 1963 PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW

LOCAL GOVERNMENT! BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

FINAL PROPOSAL

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD

SHACKLEFORD CP

WAVERLEY DISTRICT

WTTLEY CP

*** 4~ BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD °

* ! j. SEALE AND TONGHAM CP *« Proposal 5k '•

PUTTENHAM CP ' QQ

T WAVERLEY DISTRICT a - .

-fflblb ' BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD 4° . f:*

X^-X-Q SEALE AND TONGHAM CP 0 * ?%^- - .-

WAVERLEY DISTRICT

EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY EXISTING CP BOUNDARY ©Crown C 1983 PRINCIPAL AREA REVIEW

LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

FINAL PROPOSAL

BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD

5EALE AND TONGHAM CP

WAVERLEY DISTRICT

Proposot on BOROUGH OF GUILDFORD

SEALE AND TONGHAM CP

WAVERLEY DISTRICT

EXISTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY PROPOSED DISTRICT BOUNDARY EXISTING CP BOUNDARY © Crown Copyright 1983 4 Q