DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 4^ 7 LOCAL GOTEEDMHT BOUNDARY OOJMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. ^" 3 7 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNMHY COMMISSIOH FOR ENGLAND CHAIBMAH Mr G J Ellerton CMS MBE IEPTJTT CHATRMAN Sir Wilfred Burns CB CBE MEMBERS Lftdj Ackner Mr T BrockUnk DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry T3I1 3T. HCS. PATRICK J2KKIN UP SECRETARY OF STATE ?03 THE EKVI30KK2IT *. In their parish review report subnitted to us on 16 June iV80f Guildford Borough Council suggested changes to parts of ths boundary between the Borough, of Cuildford ?.r.d the Boroughs of Surrey Heath, Poking and Elmbridge, and Districts of Hole Valley and T7averley in the Coi-nty of Surrey, and the Borough of 3ushmoor in the County of Hacipahire in the following parishad and unparished areas:- Ash Parish, Guildford/Surrey Heath Borough Pirbright Parish, Guildford/Surroy Eeath Borough Pirbright Parish, Guildi'ord/tfokinc Borough Ockha-n Parisii, Guildfcrd/Elcbridge Borough Effin^haa Parish, Guildford/r.role Valley District East I'.orsley Parish, Guildford/Abinger Parish, Kole Valley Shere Parish, Guildford/Abinter Parish, Hole Valley Shere Parish, Guildford/Ev/hurst Parish, Vfaverley District Albury Parish, Cuildford/V.'onersh Parish, V/averley r:halfor;l parish, Guildford/Bcamley Parish, TTaverley Shalford Parish, Guildford/Godalming Parish, 77averley Coinpton Parish, Guildford/Godalmir.g Parish, '.V-: verley Shackleford Parish, Guildford/Goclaiming Parish, i7a*/erley ShaclQeford Parish, Guildford/Witley Parish, ";7averley Seale and Tongham Parish, Guildford/Elstead Parisl;, /teverley Seale and Toafjham Parish, GuildTord/Tilford Parish, VTaverley Seale and Tonghaa Parish, Guildford/7averley District Ash Parish, Guilclford, Surrey/Rushooor Borough, Eaapshlre ^ ;2. In the Effingham CP, Cuildford/L:ol3 Vslley boundary area, Guildford Borough Council 3u>_r;9sted thit houses opposite jlffinghc^:. village or. the "ole Valley sido cf the boundary should be brought within..Effi.'i£hain ;?-arish bac^use cf a cordon cocaunity of intorast; for the remaining areas, they nurgected minor alterations to create more, satisfactory administrative boundaries. 3- V.'e considered Guildford Borough Council's request, as required by Section 45(5) of the Local Government Act 1972, having regard to the Department of the Environment Circular 33/7? and our Report :To. 287- 4. We had before us the 'Views of all the parishes and district councils concerned with the changes suggested in the various areas and of Surrey and Hampshire County Councils. In the absence of general agreement on the necessity of carrying out a review of the boundary between Guildford Borough in Surrey and Rushmoor Borough in Hampshire, we were not satisfied we had sufficient justification for embarking on an ad hoc review in advance of the review of county boundaries during the period after 1984 for which the Act provides. For the remainder we decided that we should undertake a review, and that the circumstances were sufficiently exceptional to enable us to shorten our normal procedure by publishing draft proposals at the time time as we formally announced our intention to carry out a review. 5. We based our draft proposals on Guildford Borough Council's submission in all j • *-i areas except one which is dealt with"below. In three instances however this involved, on the advice of Ordnance Survey, extending Guildford Borough Council's suggested area fox alteration into adjacent par i shed or unparished area as follows:- Pitfbri^it CP, Guildford/Woking Borough extended into Worplesdon CP, Guildford Seale and Tongham CP, Guildford/Tilford CP, Waverley extended into Waverley District CP, Guildford/Mole Valley extended into Wotton CP, Mole Valley In respect of the one exception the Albury CP (Guildford)/Wonersh (Waverley) boundary, we adopted the alternative boundary suggested by Wonersh Parish Council. 6. On 7 October 1982, we issued a consultation letter announcing the start of the review and giving details of our draft proposals. The letter was addressed to Guildford Borough Council and copies were sent to Surrey County Council, Surrey Heath, Woking and Elmbridge Borough Councils. and Mole Valley and Waverley District Councils, the parish councils concerned, MPs of the constituencies concerned, headquarters of the main political parties, local newspapers circulating in the areas concerned and the local government press. The district councils were asked to publish a notice announcing the start of the review and the publication of the draft proposals, and to place copies of it on display at places where public notices were customarily displayed; they were also asked to place copies of the draft proposals on deposit at their main offices for a period of six weeks. 7. Copies of our letters were also sent to Hampshire County Council and Rushraoor Borough Council in that county. RESPONSE TO TITS DRAFT PROPOSALS 8. In response to the publication of our draft proposals we received letters from Surrey County Council, the Borou^i Councils of Elmbridge, Guildford, Surrey Heath and 7'oking, Mole Valley District Council, Godalming Town Council, the Parish Councils of Effin^iara, Elstead, flitley and vYotton, the Thames '.Vater Authority, the Bookhams Residents' Association and several private individuals. 9. The Borough Councils of Elmbridge and Surrey Heath supported our draft proposals as they affected their boundaries. Surrey County Council, Woking Borough Council, and the Thames ^Tater Authority had no comments to make. All the comments received referred to draft proposals affecting the boundary between the Borough of Guildford, and the Districts of Mole Valley and "tfaverley. a. Mole Valley District 10. All the representations except three concerned the Effingham/(Bookham) Mole Valley boundary. 11. Effin^iam Parish Council had felt for some years that this particular boundary change was necessary as properly reflecting community ties and known wishes of some of ,the affected residents. 12. Mole Valley District Council argued strongly that the transfer of this area would split the historical village of Little Bookham and would involve a loss of rateable value. The Council had also conducted a poll in the area which indicated that the majority of the residents affected by the draft proposal objected to it. 13. Wotton Parish Council opposed the part of our draft proposals which affected their boundary. As explained in our letter of 7 October 1982 announcing the draft proposals, this area was incorporated at Ordnance Survey's suggestion; it was of no consequence to the main proposals and no electorate was involved. 14. The Bookhams Residents' Association were also opposed to our draft proposals for the same reasons as Mole Valley District Council. 15. Sixteen letters were received from residents affected by the proposal. Of these two supported our draft proposal whereas the other fourteen voiced strong objections. Amongst the reasons given for their objections were ties with Bookham and Mole Valley, historical boundaries, higher rates in Guildford, additional parish precept in Effingham, and a supposedly consequential change in postal address. t>- Waverley District 16. Godalming Town Council welcomed, and Elstead Parish Council had no objections to our draft proposals insofar as they affected the district boundary in their respective areas. 17. Witley Parish Council opposed the minor realignment of the district boundary which split properties between the ->hackleford/Witley parishes. They suggested instead that the boundary should be realigned in the opposite direction, so that three adjacent cottages in Shackleford were transferred to their area as they were part of Milford village. They did not, however, specify the actual line the new boundary should follow. 18. We reassessed our draft proposals in the light of the representations we received and the alternatives put forward. We noted that only two of our draft proposals had been opposed, affecting the Guildford/Mole Valley boundary in the area adjoining the parish of Effingham (proposal 4c) and the Guildford/V.'averley boundary in the area of the parishes of Shackleford and "flitley (proposal 5j)- In the light of the number of representations received and the strength of the opposition to the changes, we decided that we would not proceed with these two draft proposals as published. However, rather than formulating final proposals immediately, based on alternative suggestions made in the representations, we decided to publish revised draft proposals to allow the opportunity of further public comment, ^'hese revised draft proposals involved the exclusion of the small area of '.Votton Parish from the Effingfaam, Guildford/(Bookham)/Wotton, Mole Valley transfer and the adoption of an alternative boundary suggested by V/itley Parish Council for the Shackleford, Guildford/7?itley, Waver ley area. 19. We published our revised draft proposals on 22 April 1923. Copies were sent to all those who had received our original draft proposals letter or who had since made representations to us. RESPONSE TO T!£ REVISED DRAFT PROPOSALS 20. In response to the publication of our revised draft proposals, we received letters from Surrey County Council, Guildford Borough Council, Mole Valley and Waver ley District Councils, Effingham and Shackleford Parish Councils, the Bookhams Residents' Association and two private individuals. a. Effingham, Guildford/(Bookham)/Vtotton, Mole Valley (proposal 4c) 21. Surrey County Council had no comments to make. 22. Mole Valley
Recommended publications
  • Consultation Bodies for the Godalming & Farncombe

    Consultation Bodies for the Godalming & Farncombe

    Consultation Bodies for the Godalming & Farncombe Neighbourhood Plan Age Concern Waverley Artington Parish Council Binscombe Church Binscombe Residents' Association British Telecom Busbridge Parish Council Castle Water Churches Together Citizens' Advice Waverley Compass Coaches Compton Parish Council CPRE CPRE Waverley Croft Road Residents' Association EDF Energy EE T-Mobile & Orange Environment Agency Farncombe Initiative First Church of Christ Scientist Forestry Commission Frith Hill Residents' Association Godalming Bahai's Godalming Baptist Church Godalming Cycle Campaign Godalming Flood Forum Godalming Trust Godalming Unitarian Church Godalming United Church Guildford Borough Council Highways England Historic England Homes & Communities Agency Institute of Directors, Surrey Jehovah's Witness Lammas Road Residents' Association Marine Management Organization Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Natural England Network Rail NHS Guildford & Waverly CCG Guildford & Waverly CCG NW Surrey CCG Surrey Heath CCG NHS NHS Property Services Mill Medical Practice Binscombe Medical Centre Milford Crossroads & Witley Surgery Hurst Farm Surgery 02 UK Peperharow & Dean Roads Residents' Association Police & Crime Commissioner, Surrey Religious Society of Friends, Godalming Scotia Gas Networks Scottish & Southern Electricity Shackleford Parish Council Shalford Parish Council South East Water Southern Water Stagecoach SE Hants & Surrey St John the Baptist, Busbridge St John the Evangelist, Farncombe St Peter & St Paul, Godalming Surrey
  • Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (As of 18/11/2019)

    Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (As of 18/11/2019)

    Live Vacancies Report - Mole Valley (as of 18/11/2019) Date The following information has been designed to be shared with the relevant local Job Centre Plus / Stake Holder offices with the intention that they can promote these opportunities to their clients. It is important that these reports are used only as a guide, and that you log onto Find an apprenticeship for the most up to date information. Please be aware that vacancies that appear to have no applications may be recruiting via their own recruitment pages - these will be shaded green. Please do not contact the employer unless stated in the vacancy. If you require more information than is described, please contact the learning provider in the first instance; their contact details will be available in the advert. Registered & Currently Active Candidates refers to those who have registered and engaged with the Find an apprenticeship system and are still active on the system. (Candidates can become inactive voluntarily e.g. by being successful with no need to use the system further) Key: No applications have yet been received for this vacancy Applications going directly to employer website and can't be counted Vacancy Title Vacancy Title Apprentice Support Care Worker Infrastructure Technician Apprenticeship - 19277 Business Admin Apprentice Dorking ARC Volkswagen Group Mechanical, Electrical and Trim (MET) Technician Apprentice Dorking ARC Volkswagen Group Paint Technician Apprentice Level 2 Hospitality Team Member Apprenticeship Optical Assistant Apprenticeship - LEATHERHEAD SPECSAVERS
  • Thorner Cottage the Green • Pirbright • Surrey

    Thorner Cottage the Green • Pirbright • Surrey

    THORNER COTTAGE THE GREEN • PIRBRIGHT • SURREY THORNER COTTAGE THE GREEN • PIRBRIGHT • SURREY A quintessential Grade II listed village house with lovely views Brookwood station 1.5 miles (Brookwood to London Waterloo from 35 minutes) Woking 6 miles (Woking to London Waterloo from 23 minutes) Guildford 7 miles • A3 6.3 miles (All distances and times are approximate) Reception hall/sitting room • Drawing room • Study • Family room • Games/cinema room Kitchen/dining room • Utility room • Cloakroom Master bedroom with adjoining bathroom and dressing room • 4 further bedrooms 2 further shower rooms (both en-suite). Attractive south facing gardens with swimming pool In all about 0.38 acres Knight Frank LLP 231 High Street, Guildford, Surrey GU1 3BQ 01483 565171 knightfrank.co.uk These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the brochure. Situation Thorner Cottage overlooks The Green in the heart of the village yet at the same time very accessible to both Guildford and Woking. Pirbright is an archetypal English village with attractive properties surrounding the village green, with a duck pond, public houses, primary school and renowned butcher. The surrounding countryside has excellent walking and many miles of bridleways. The neighbouring towns of Guildford and Woking offer more comprehensive educational and shopping facilities. The area is well served for road connections including the A3 at Guildford and the M3 (Junction 3) at Bagshot providing access to the national motorway network, London and the international airports of Heathrow, Gatwick and Southampton.
  • T Clandon Parish Council

    T Clandon Parish Council

    CLANDON PARISH COUNCIL ChairmanWE, : ;T Mr Terence Patrick , Stoney Royd, Woodstock, West Clandon, Guildford, GU4 7UJ Clerk: Mr John Stone, Hunters End, Lime Grove, West Clandon, Guildford GU4 7UT 01483 385187: [email protected] : www.westclandon.org.uk Tracy Coleman Director of Planning and Regeneration Guildford Borough Council Millmead House Millmead Guildford, Surrey GU24BB 13'*^ March 2019 Dear Ms Coleman, Application for Designation of the Civil Parish of West Clandon as a Neighbourhood Area. In accordance with the provisions of the Localism Act 2011 and the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 Section 5, West Clandon Parish Council formally apply to Guildford Borough Council as the Planning Authority to designate the Civil Parish of West Clandon as a Neighbourhood Area, in accordance with Regulation 5 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 ("The Regulations"). Map- Attached herewith is a map showing the Civil Parish of West Clandon as required by the Regulations. The Regulations also require the following two statements in support of this application. Statement 1 Why the Parish of West Clandon is appropriate to be designated as a Neighbourhood Area. The Village of West Clandon is at the heart of the Parish located in the County of Surrey four miles to the East of Guildford. The Parish Council has been in continuous operation since 1889 and is one of 24 parishes within the Borough of Guildford. At the last census the population was recorded as 1363. Significant development is proposed both within the parish boundaries and adjacent areas under the auspices of the Guildford Local Plan. The Parish Council wishes to play an active role in ensuring new developments are well planned and integrated into the local area and serve the interests of residents.
  • The Constitution

    The Constitution

    Public Document Pack 1 THE CONSTITUTION WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL Contents Pages Pages 3 - 4 Part 1 - Introduction Pages 5 - 8 Part 2 - Articles of the Constitution Pages 9 - 46 Part 3 - Responsibility for Functions, Management Arrangements and Scheme of Delegations Pages 47 - 120 Part 4 - Council Procedure Rules Pages 121 - 182 Part 5 - Codes and Protocols Pages 183 - 294 Index Pages 295 – 318 2 Agenda Item 1 3 CONTENTS Part 1 – Introduction 5 Introduction 7 Part 2 – Articles of the Constitution 9 Article 1 – The Constitution 11 Article 2 – Members of the Council 13 Article 3 – Citizens and The Council 15 Article 4 – The Full Council 17 Article 5 – Chairing The Council 19 Article 6 – Overview and Scrutiny Committee 21 Article 7 – The Leader 25 Article 8 – The Executive 27 Article 9 – Regulatory and Other Committees 29 Article 10 – The Standards and Audit Committee 31 Article 11 – Officers 33 Article 12 – Decision Making 37 Article 13 – Finance and Contracts 39 Article 14 – Review and Revision of the Constitution 41 Article 15 – Suspension, Interpretation and Publication of the Constitution 43 Schedule 1 – Description of Executive Arrangements 45 Part 3 – Responsibility for Functions, Management Arrangements and Scheme of Delegations 47 Functions 49 Joint Committee for the Oversight of Delivery of Surrey Public Authority Services (“Surrey First”) 55 Woking Joint Committee 59 Joint Waste Collection Services Committee 81 Management Arrangements 89 Scheme of Delegations 91 Part 4 – Council Procedure Rules 121 Standing Orders 123 Conventions
  • SHERE PARISH COUNCIL Serving the Villages of Gomshall, Holmbury St

    SHERE PARISH COUNCIL Serving the Villages of Gomshall, Holmbury St

    SHERE PARISH COUNCIL Serving the villages of Gomshall, Holmbury St. Mary, Peaslake, Shere and a large part of Abinger Hammer Joy Millett Tanyard Hall Parish Clerk/Finance Officer, 30 Station Road Telephone/Fax: 01483 203431 Gomshall Guildford, [email protected] Surrey. GU5 9LF http://www.ShereParishCouncil.gov.uk Planning Committee Meeting held at 6.30pm on Thursday 15th October 2015 Tanyard Hall, 30 Station Road, Gomshall GU5 9LF Draft Minutes Welcome Present: Councillors R Smith (Chairman), R Davey, B Harrap, B Grover, B Andrews and Assistant to the Clerk S Hoyland Apologies for absence: A Golightly and C Brooke Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary and Other Interests from Councillors on any of the items on the agenda. - None Approval of the Minutes of the meeting held on 10th September 2015 - APPROVED and SIGNED as a correct record SHORT ADJOURNMENT TO ENABLE THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE COMMITTEE. Consideration of Planning Applications: 15/P/01606 & 15/P/01607 Rydings Cottage, Mackies Hill, Peaslake Single storey front extension and Listed Building Consent for a single storey front extension – NO OBJECTION 15/P/01610 6 High View, Gomshall Two storey side extension and single storey rear extension following demolition of existing conservatory – Already Approved 8/10/15. It was AGREED to comment on the excessive time it took Guildford Borough Council to notify the Parish Council of this planning application, after the date the application was made. 15/P/01760 Sandwood, Burrows Lane, Shere Two-storey rear extension including juliet balcony to north elevation. Addition of dormer windows to south and east elevation, roof lights to north and south elevations and alteration to fenestration – This item was brought forward as the applicant was present.
  • Guildford Borough Mapset

    Guildford Borough Mapset

    from from from WOKING LONDON WOKING A247 A3 A322 Pitch Place Jacobswell A247 A320 GUILDFORD WEST Bellfields ey BOROUGH Slyfield r W CLANDON ve APPROACH MAP Green Ri Abbots- Stoughton wood A3 Burpham A3100 N A323 Bushy Hill from A25 Park A25 LEATHERHEAD Barn Merrow A25 A322 A25 SURREY H UNIVERSITY A320 GUILDFORD CATHEDRAL Guildford A246 Park Onslow A3 Village GUILDFORD A31 DORKING from HOGS BACK from D O W N S FARNHAM A31 T H O R N A281 A3 ARTINGTON A248 LITTLETON A3100 CHILWORTH SHALFORD ALBURY LOSELEY COMPTON HOUSE A248 B3000 from from from PORTSMOUTH MILFORD HORSHAM PRODUCED BY BUSINESS MAPS LTD FROM DIGITAL DATA - COPYRIGHT BARTHOLOMEW(1996) TEL: 01483 422766 FAX: 01483 422747 M25 Pibright Bisley Camp GUILDFORD Camp BOROUGH MAP B367 OCKHAM B3012 SEND EFFINGHAM Pirbright B368 JUNCTION B2215 B2039 B3032 WORPLESDON A247 B380 EAST NORTH CAMP Worplesdon A3 HORSLEY ASH VALE Jacobswell A247 Common WEST EFFINGHAM Ash Vale A322 WEST A324 CLANDON HORSLEY Slyfield A323 EAST A246 A246 AshCommon Fairlands Green Burpham CLANDON CLANDON Wood Street A323 A320 A321 Village B2234 ASH Wyke Merrow A25 Park Barn A25 ASH WANBOROUGH B3009 AshGreen Onslow Village Wanborough TONGHAM Chantries HOGS BACK A25 A31 A281 Chilworth ALBURY GOMSHALL Littleton A3100 Seale PUTTENHAM B3000 A248 COMPTON SHERE from The DORKING Sands CHILWORTH B3000 B2128 Brook Sutton A3 Farley Abinger Green PEASLAKE Eashing N HOLMBURY ST MARY B2126 BOROUGH BOUNDARY from OCKLEY PRODUCED BY BUSINESS MAPS LTD FROM DIGITAL DATA - COPYRIGHT BARTHOLOMEW(1996) BUSINESS MAPS LTD TEL: 01483 422766
  • EXE20-001 Appendix 4A

    EXE20-001 Appendix 4A

    Appendix 4a WOKING BOROUGH COUNCIL FOOD SAFETY SERVICE PLAN 2020/2021 1. Service Aims and Objectives 1.1. Aims and Objectives 1.1.1. The objectives of the food safety service are: to ensure that food and drink intended for sale for human consumption, which is produced, stored, distributed, handled or consumed within the Borough is without risk to the health or safety of the consumer; to investigate suspected and confirmed food poisoning incidents, to locate the source of contamination and to prevent it spreading to protect the health of the public; to provide information and advice on food safety matters for business and members of the public. 1.2. Links to Corporate Objectives and Plans 1.2.1. This food safety service plan is the Council’s expression of its commitment to the delivery of a continually improving food service, in line with the corporate vision and values to provide excellent services in a forward thinking and sustainable way. 1.2.2. Food safety, and specifically the improvement of compliance with food hygiene regulations by businesses in the Borough is outlined as a Corporate Objective within Woking Borough Council’s Service Plans for 2020/21. 1.2.3. The food safety service contributes to the Council’s priority of promoting health and well being, healthy diet is also one of the 6 priorities agreed by the Woking Health and Wellbeing Board. 1.2.4. This plan provides information about the food safety services, the means by which they are provided and the means for monitoring and reviewing service performance against set standards.
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents

    Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents

    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the South East region 11 Initial proposals for the Berkshire sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, 13 Kent, and Medway sub-region Initial proposals for the West Sussex sub-region 16 Initial proposals for the Buckinghamshire 17 and Milton Keynes sub-region Initial proposals for the Hampshire, Portsmouth 18 and Southampton sub-region Initial proposals for the Isle of Wight sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Oxfordshire sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Surrey sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 23 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 27 including wards and electorates Glossary 53 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do Our proposals leave 15 of the 84 existing constituencies unchanged. We propose The Boundary Commission for England only minor changes to a further 47 is an independent and impartial constituencies, with two wards or fewer non -departmental public body which is altered from the existing constituencies. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The rules that we work to state that we must allocate two constituencies to the Isle The 2018 Review of Wight. Neither of these constituencies is required to have an electorate that is within We have the task of periodically reviewing the requirements on electoral size set out the boundaries of all the Parliamentary in the rules.
  • Crawley Borough Council

    Crawley Borough Council

    Agenda item no. 9 GATWICK AIRPORT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCES – CRAWLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL List of Planning Applications Determined During the Period 1st April to 30th June 2013 CR/2011/0573/CON NORTH TERMINAL, GATWICK AIRPORT, FURLONG WAY, GATWICK, CRAWLEY CONSULTATION FROM GATWICK AIRPORT LIMITED FOR LANDSCAPING, PUBLIC REALM ENHANCEMENTS AND PROVISION OF A COVERED WALKWAY Tandridge District Council No Objection Mole Valley District Council No Objection WSCC None Received Reigate & Banstead BC No Objection The Safeguarding Department No Objection – Cranes condition Mid Sussex District Council None Received Horsham District Council None Received Surrey County Council None Received. NATS No Objection Counter Terrorism Security Advisor None received Decision – Permit 03/05/2013 CR/2011/0540/CON NORTHGATE HOUSE, LONDON GATWICK AIRPORT, LONGBRIDGE GATE, GATWICK, CRAWLEY CONSULTATION FROM GATWICK AIRPORT FOR THE CHANGE OF USE TO THE NORTHGATE BUILDING, NORTH TERMINAL FROM B8 (STORAGE) TO B1 (BUSINESS) Mid Sussex District Council No comments Horsham District Council None Received Tandridge District Council No Objection Mole Valley District Council None Received WSCC None Received Reigate & Banstead BC No Objection Surrey County Council No comment Decision – No objection 01/05/2013 The applicant is advised however to ensure that flood resiliance measure are built into the development that is located in an Environment Agency Zone 3 Flood Risk Area. CR/2013/0103/FUL FIRST POINT, BUCKINGHAM GATE, GATWICK, CRAWLEY INSTALLATION OF 1 X AIR HANDLING UNIT, 1 X HEAT RECOVERY UNIT WITHIN THE EXISTING ACOUSTIC ENCLOSURE ON ROOF AND 2 X EXTERNAL CONDENSERS ON ROOF ADJACENT TO ENCLOSURE NATS None received GAL Aerodrome Safeguarding No Objection - subject to Cranes Informative CBC Environmental Health No comments Decision – Permit 25/04/2013 Informative in relation to cranes, in addition to standard conditions.
  • THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION for ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW of SURREY Final Recommendations for Electoral Division

    THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION for ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW of SURREY Final Recommendations for Electoral Division

    SHEET 2, MAP 2a Proposed electoral division boundaries in Camberley town THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND KING'S RIDE D Collingwood BAGSHOT, WINDLESHAM AND CHOBHAM ED Cordwalles R College Junior School N ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SURREY O (54) T Playing S Reservoir G Collingwood Field IN College D (covered) K OA R T ON H Turf Hill D E ON M BAGSHOT WARD L AU L 3 Final recommendations for electoral division boundaries T W M AY C in the County of Surrey January 2012 M DE A RI E A E U ED BISLEY LIGHTWATER, AND END WEST EG S L Vehicle Testing Area LL T S CO A W ER R E E PP A R D U 'S Y Sheet 2 of 7 RI C E C EG A L M L S O P C D E OLD DEAN WARD R R Barossa Common A D C O S WINDLESHAM CP R L E IL H Y H This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of T M X U O O Scale : 1cm = 0.07800 km Lorraine O F the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. U M LIGHTWATER WARD School S R T Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Grid Interval 1km R G O D I P B R The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2012. I R B V D E E T N L IG A RE N VE AD E SO RO (59) KEY ON ND BOROUGH COUNCIL BOUNDARY LO IDE E R Olddean Common EG PROPOSED ELECTORAL DIVISION BOUNDARY OLL C WARD BOUNDARY E IDG Y R H PARISH BOUNDARY LE IL AW L CR C PARISH WARD BOUNDARY R E Allotment S T GUILDFORD BOROUGH BOROUGH NAME Gardens R D ROAD CAMBERLEY WEST ED PROPOSED ELECTORAL DIVISION NAME K N IG WARD NAME K PARKSIDE WARD H IDDLETON I M N E TS L G S ASH CP PARISH NAME B E ' S R N W R I D O I D G O ASH VALE PARISH WARD PARISH WARD NAME Crawley Ridge D 3 E E M Y D A R Junior School R W E D D IV UN R RO D Crawley Ridge L L COINCIDENT BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN AS THIN COLOURED LINES Infant School A H AD RO D ON E SUPERIMPOSED OVER WIDER ONES.
  • 1994 Appendices

    1994 Appendices

    APPENDICES Footnotes I Chronology of Evolving Architecture/Design II List of Consultees III Principal Issues Raised by Consultations IV Principal Contacts V Summary List of Strategic Policies VI List of Illustrations VII APPENDIX I: FOOTNOTES 1 London Planning Advisory Committee : 1993 Draft Advice on Strategic Planning Guidance for London (para. 8.14) 2 Royal Fine Art Commission: Thames Connections Exhibition (May 1991) 3 Judy Hillman: A New Look for London (Royal Fine Art Commission 1988) ISBN 0 11 752135 3 4 Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Landscape Strategy for the Thames between Hampton Court and Kew: Elements for the Project Brief (July 1992) Kim Wilkie Environmental Design: Report on Consultation (July 1992) 5 Sherban Cantacuzino Eddington Charitable Trust Johnny Van Haeften Mick Jagger Richard Lester Prince and Princess Rupert Loewenstein 6 David Lowenthal: The Historic Landscape Reconsidered (George Washington Univ. 1990) 7 English Nature: Strategy for the 1990s: Natural Areas (1993) 8 Richmond Council demolition of Devonshire Lodge at the foot of Richmond Hill in 1960s 9 Countryside Commission, English Heritage, English Nature: Conservation Issues in Strategic Plans (August 1993) ISBN 0 86170 383 9 10 Greater London Council, Department of Transportation and Development: Thames-side Guidelines, An Environmental Handbook for London’s River (March 1986) 11 London Ecology Unit A Nature Conservation Strategy for London (Ecology Handbook 4) Nature Conservation in Hounslow (Ecology Handbook 15) 1990 Nature Conservation in Kingston