E

I I Report on Lower Housatonic River Sediment r PCB Sampling D n r i R General Electric Company Pittsfield, Massachusetts L December 1996 o o L o O o I NJ OJ o

BBBLASLANDJOUCKjaEJL^ INC, engineers &sc/enf/sfs Area Environmental & Facility Programs General Electric Company WO Woodlawn Avenue. Pittsfield. MA 01201

Transmitted Via Federal Express

December 19, 1996

Charles G. Fredette Mr. Bryan Olson Department of USEPA, Region 1 Environmental Protection Waste Management Section 122 Washington Street JFK Federal Building, HRR-CAN3 Hartford, CT 06106 Boston, MA 02203-2211

Re: Lower Housatonic River Sediment PCB Sampling Report

Dear Mr. Fredette and Mr. Olson:

Enclosed please find the Report on Lower Housatonic River Sediment PCB Sampling. This report includes a brief summary of the PCB data compiled from appropriate files maintained by the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CDEP) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) of the section of the Housatonic River below the Derby Dam. As discussed, this report only describes PCB data from this reach, although other available sediment data are presented in the attachments.

Please call us with any questions.

Very truly yours,

Andrew T. Silfer, P.E. Remediation Project Manager

DCK/rmg SYR-T \4J96I137WPD cc: R. Bell, Esquire DEP J.R. Bieke, Esquire, Shea & Gardner J.L. Cutler, DEP R.F. Desgroseilliers, GE R.K. Goldman, P.E., L.S.P., Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. M. Hoagland, EPA D.J. Luckerman, Esquire, EPA 0 J. M. Nuss, P.E., L.S.P., Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. S. Steenstrup, DEP A.J. Thomas, Esquire, GE A. Weinberg, DEP December 19, 1996 Page 2 of2

S.P. Winslow, Esquire, DEP Housatonic River Initiative (w/o enclosure) Public Information Repositories (ECLI-R-IV (A)(l) and (2))

Enclosure i—

" Report on Lower \ Housatonic River Sediment [ PCS Sampling r r i

General Electric Company Pittsfield, Massachusetts

December 1996

I 1 BLASLAND, BOUCK 8t LEE INC. onglnoort A tolentltts 6723 Towpath Road, P.O. Box 66 Syracuse, New York, 13214-0066 (315)446-9120 I Table of Contents

I. Introduction 1

IJj II. Data Compilation 2

III. Information Summary 3

I A. USEPA PCB Data 3

B. CDEP Analytical Data 4

Tables Table 1 Summary of Lower Housatonic River Sediment Sampling Information Table 2 Summary of Lower Housatonic River Sediment PCB Analytical Data

p Figures Figure 1 Lower Housatonic River Sediment Sampling Locations

j Attachments ! '<• Attachment 1 Data Set - USEPA-1 r Attachment 2 Data Sets - CDEP-1 through CDEP-9 i

i

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC. SYR-TW561137 wro-12/19/96 engineers & scientists f / Introduction

This report has been has been prepared by Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. (BBL) at the request of the General Electric Company (GE) to summarize available PCB data for sediments associated with a ten-mile stretch of the Housatonic River. The section of the river addressed by this effort is the estuary portion which includes the river from its mouth at Long Island Sound to a point approximately ten miles north at Derby, CT ("lower Housatonic River"). This data compilation effort involved a review of information available from the United States Environmental i Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CDEP). In general, the analytical information obtained through the USEPA and CDEP consisted of a total of 181 sediment samples (including 14 duplicate samples) collected from 153 locations from the lower ten miles of the Housatonic River. I These samples were collected during the time period ranging from September 1981 to August 1995.

Section II of this report briefly describes BBL's data compilation efforts, while Section III provides an overview of the compiled PCB database. In addition to the report narrative, Table 1 summarizes the information reviewed by BBL, Table 2 summarizes the PCB data compiled from this information, and Figure 1 presents the approximate sediment sampling locations (where known).

Information obtained from the USEPA and CDEP is included as Attachments 1 and 2, respectively. Although Attachments 1 and 2 contain, in addition to PCB data, other sediment analytical data, those data are not specifically C discussed within this report since, pursuant to discussions with the CDEP, the focus of this effort was sediment PCB data. This information has been included in Attachments 1 and 2 for completeness.

I I

C L I

a BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC. SYR-TVM541137WTO-12/19/96 engineers 4 scientists i // Data Compilation

In June 1996, BBL, on behalf of GE, contacted Mr. Michael Jasinski at the USEPA in Boston, MA regarding the availability of sediment PCB data for the lower Housatonic River. Subsequently, Mr. Jasinski determined that the only sediment PCB data for the lower Housatonic River maintained in USEPA files were associated with the USEPA Raymark Industries Federal Super-fund Site in Stratford, CT. In August 1996, Mr. Jasinski forwarded a data package (Attachment 1) along with associated mapping for sediment sampling conducted in the lower Housatonic River area for that Superfund Site. As shown on Figure 1, many of the sediment samples were collected from wetland and tributary areas immediately adjacent to the Housatonic River. These data are further discussed I in Section III.

BBL made similar inquiries on GE's behalf in June 1996 to the CDEP. BBL coordinated this search effort with Mr. George Wisker, Senior Environmental Analyst at the CDEP. Mr. Wisker conducted a preliminary review of appropriate files, and concluded that BBL would need to make an office visit to fully review the pertinent files. On August 6, 1996, BBL reviewed the relevant CDEP files in Hartford, CT, obtaining available sediment PCB data. r The available sediment PCB data included nine Housatonic River dredging permit applications made to the State of Connecticut between 1981 to 1995. The information obtained during that review is included with this report as E Attachment 2. i i

i i

BLASLAND BOUCK&LEE. INC r SYR-TVM5AH37WPD- 12/19/96 engineers A scientists E /// Information Summary

In genera], the analytical information obtained through the USEPA and CDEP consisted of a total of 181 sediment samples (including 14 duplicate samples) collected from 153 locations from the lower ten miles of the Housatonic River. These samples were collected during the time period ranging from September 1981 to August 1995. For almost all the sediment sampling data provided, information regarding sampling depths was not available. The i PCB concentration s of the sediment samples ranged from non-detect to 18.2 ppm. Approximately 85 percent of the results exhibited PCB concentrations less than 1 ppm, with only four exceeding 10 ppm. The overall average PCB concentration of all sediment sample results was calculated to be 0.92 ppm (using one-half the detection limit I for non-detec t results and a zero value for unknown detection limits) or 0.90 ppm (using a zero value for non-detect results and unknown detection limits).

Approximately 80 percent of the PCB results contained Aroclor-specific information. Where such information was li available, Aroclors 1262 and 1268 comprised approximately 90 percent of the PCB detected. These Aroclors are a more highly chlorinated biphenyl than those found at any sampling location upstream within the river system. Aroclors 1254 and 1260 comprised most of the remainder of the PCB detected in these samples, while Aroclor 1242 was reported for one sample result. For the four sediment samples with PCB concentrations above 10 ppm, Aroclor 1268 comprised approximately 75 percent of the detected PCB, while Aroclor 1262 comprised the remainder.

The highest PCB concentrations in the available USEPA and CDEP data were associated with sediment samples collected from an area along the Housatonic River adjacent to the City of Stratford. The Raymark Industries, Inc. Federal Superfund Site, which comprises a number of disposal areas in Stratford, was confirmed by USEPA to contain PCBs in surficial soils and to be the source of PCBs in sediments of one creek leading to the Housatonic River. These disposal areas are upstream of the Housatonic River and may be a source of PCBs for the Housatonic River sediments. Available sampling information upstream and downstream of the City of Stratford in the lower I Housatoni c River show PCB concentrations to be primarily non-detect in sediments, with the highest PCB concentration of 0.161 ppm found at an upstream sample location.

I A summary of this information is included in Tables 1 and 2, while sampling locations (where known) are shown on Figure 1. (For a number of the sampling results, the sampling locations were not identified in the information provided by the USEPA or CDEP; hence, these locations are not shown on Figure 1.) Provided below are brief summaries of the USEPA and CDEP data sets which include information pertaining to:

• Number of sediment samples collected: • Date of sampling; • Parties conducting sampling and analyses; • Location of sampling; and o • PCB range of sediment sampling results. A. USEPA PCB Data

The sediment PCB data obtained by BBL from the USEPA is designated as data set "USEPA-1" on Tables 1 and 2. These data were collected in June 1993 and between August 1994 and August 1995 as part of investigations I associated with the Raymark Industries, Inc., Federal Superfund Site, located in Stratford, CT. The June 1993 sampling event involved the collection of 22 sediment samples (denoted with prefix "HR" in i Table 2). Sample s were collected by USEPA Region I from the mouth of the Housatonic River at Long Island Sound to a location north of the City of Stratford, CT (Figure 1) and analyzed by RECRA Environmental, Inc. These samples contained PCBs at concentrations ranging from non-detect to 0.790 ppm (estimated value).

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC SYfm4456ii37wro~ iz/19^6 engineers S. scientists 3 I

Eleven of the samples were non-detect [detection limits ranged from 0.041 ppm (estimated value) to 0.45 ppm; note that not all detection limits were available]. PCB concentrations ranged from 0.034 ppm (estimated value) to 0.790 ppm (estimated value) for the remaining 11 samples. Aroclors detected in these samples were reported as Aroclors 1262 and 1268 (Attachment 1).

1 The second sampling event, occurring between August 1994 and August 1995, involved the collection of 133 sediment samples (including 14 duplicate samples). Samples were collected by USEPA contractor Halliburton NUS and analyzed by CompuChem Environmental Corporation. These samples are denoted with prefixes "BD", I "BN", "BP", "BS", "CP", "DB", "ES", "FP", "GM", "HB" "MF", "SD", "TT, and "WP" in Table 2. Approximately one-third of these sediment samples were non-detect (detection limits ranged from 0.058 ppm to 0.450 ppm), while the remaining data exhibited PCB concentrations ranging from 0.018 ppm (estimated value) to 18.2 ppm (estimated value). Aroclors reported in these samples primarily included Aroclors 1262 and 1268. Aroclors 1254 and 1260 were also detected but at a concentration below 1 ppm for most samples. Additionally, one sample (SD11) was reported with an Aroclor 1242 concentration (estimated value due to the limited sample volume), but at a level below 1 ppm.

As shown on Figure 1, these sediment samples were collected along the western side of the Housatonic River in the City of Stratford. However, the information provided by USEPA did not include specific sample locations for 57 of the samples. Those samples that could be located are shown on Figure 1, while all sampling data, including those for samples without known locations, are included in Tables 1 and 2. Sample results from the unknown locations ranged in PCB concentration from non-detect levels to 18.2 ppm (estimated value) PCB at location SD24. As noted above, the PCBs in sediments in this area seem likely to be associated with the I Raymark Industries, Inc. Federal Superfund Site. B. CDEP Analytical Data I The CDEP files provided sediment PCB data associated with nine dredging permits filed between 1981 and 1995. These files are listed individually as data sets CDEP-1 through CDEP-9 in Tables 1 and 2 and in Attachment 2. Each of the individual data sets are discussed below. Sampling locations for all these data sets (where known) are shown on Figure 1. For the CDEP data, depth-related sampling information was available for only data set CDEP-6.

Data Set CDEP-1 Two composite samples (A&B and C&D) were collected by Breakwater Key Marina, Stratford, CT in January 1995 and analyzed by Milford Materials Testing Laboratory, Milford, CT. These two samples were collected * I from the Breakwater Key Marina property near the mouth of the Housatonic River (Figure 1). PCBs were not detected in either composite sample (0.01 ppm detection limit).

Data Set CDEP-2 Seven sediment samples (TPA-1 to TPA-7) were collected in April 1994 by the TPA Design Group and analyzed by the Connecticut Testing Laboratory, Meriden, CT. Six of these samples were located in the river channel from Carting Island south to the limit of the outer breakwater (Figure 1). The seventh (TPA-7) was collected I from a settling pond not shown in the CDEP information (and not shown on Figure 1). PCBs were not detected in any of these samples (0.01 ppm detection limit).

Data Set CDEP-3 Two composite sediment samples (P1-P7 and P8-P12) were collected by Northeast Utilities Service Co., Hartford, CT, in December 1992 and analyzed by the Environmental Science Corporation, Middletown, CT.

BL^SLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC smiA4«56i 137wo-12/19/96 engineers * scientists 4 E

These samples were collected from the eastern side of the Housatonic River at the Northeast Utilities Service Co. Devon Generating Station located north of Route 1-95 (Figure 1). PCBs were non-detect in both samples (0.1 ppm detection limit).

Data Set CDEP-4 i Three sedimen t samples (Stations I, J, and Q) were collected and analyzed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE), New England Division, Hubbardston, MA, in May 1992. These samples were collected between the Town of East Derby and the City of Stratford (Figure 1). PCB concentrations for these samples were 0.017 ppm, I 0.19 ppm , and 0.084 ppm, respectively.

Data Set CDEP-5 Two composite sediment samples (A and B) were collected by the Pootatuck Yacht Club, Stratford, CT, in March 1992 and analyzed by Milford Materials Testing Laboratory, Inc., Milford, CT. The two composite samples were prepared from eight sediment samples (four for each composite sample) taken from river sediments on the west side of the river, west of Nells Island (Figure 1). PCBs were non-detect in both samples (0.010 ppm detection limit).

Data Set CDEP-6 One sediment sample [(87-0418 (6-inch depth)] was collected by Cutter Operating Corp., Stratford, CT, in April 1987 from the Harbor Woods Marina located in Stratford, CT (Figure 1) and analyzed by Environmental Laboratories, Inc., West Haven, CT. PCBs were non-detect (0.05 ppm detection limit) in this sample.

Data Set CDEP-7 i One composit e sample (Composite 1-7) and two additional sediment samples (8 and 9) were collected by Northeast Utilities Service Co., Hartford, CT, in March 1985 from river sediments at the Devon Generating Station, north of Route 1-95 (Figure 1), and analyzed by Environmental Science Corporation, Middletown, CT. i PCBs were non-detect in all these samples (1 ppm detection limit). Data Set CDEP-8 Two sediment samples (1A and 2A) were collected and analyzed by Materials Testing, Inc., Stratford, CT, for Rowan Building Systems, Inc., Southport, CT, in October 1982. As shown on Figure 1, the two sediment samples were collected at the Harbor Woods Marina, Stratford, CT, on the western side of the Housatonic River. n PCB concentrations for these samples were 1.8 ppm and 2.0 ppm, respectively. Data Set CDEP-9 Four sediment grab samples (Stations 1 through 4) were collected by Management of Resources and the Environment, Glastonbury, CT, in September 1981 and analyzed by Environmental Science Corporation, Middletown, CT. These samples were collected south of East Derby, CT (Figure 1). PCBs were detected in all L four samples ranging from 0.014 to 0.161 ppm. I I

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC. SYVTM456M 37 wro-12/19/96 engineers & scientists I e i

I Tables

I BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC. onglnoors A ! c / o n f / i f j

fef

L I I

L; i

TABLE 1

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS

SUMMARY OF LOWER HOUSATONIC RIVER SEDIMENT SAMPLING INFORMATION

1. USEPA Data Package • Raymark Federal Superfund Site

I DATA Set SAMPLING SAMPUNG DATE PCS SAMPLING ANALYSES PARTY (Laboratory) CONDUCTED

USEPA Region I 1993 (RECRA Environmental, Inc.) 22 Sediment Samples Pesticides, PCBs. USEPA-1 P Halliburton NUS 1994-1995 (CompuChem 133 Sediment Pesticides, PCBs. Environmental Corporation, Inc. Samples (including 14 duplicates)

Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Housatonic River Dredging Permit Applications

DATA SET SAMPUNG SAMPUNG DATE SAMPLES ANALYSES PART* (Laboratory) COLLECTED

CDEP-1 Breakwater Key 1/95 (Milford Materials Testing 2 composite sediment Metals. PCBs, L Laboratory) samples Pesticides. SVOCs CDEP-2 TPA Design 4/94 (Connecticut Testing 7 sediment samples Metals, SVOCs, PCBs Group Laboratories) I CDEP-3 Northeast Utilities 12/92 (Environmental Science 2 composite sediment PCBs, Metals, Service Co. Corporation) samples Pesticides

CDEP-4 US Army Corps 5/92 (US ACOE - Environmental 3 sediment samples SVOCs, PCBs, I of Engineers Laboratory) Metals, Pesticides CDEP-5 Pootatuck Yacht 3/92 (Milford Materials Testing 2 composite sediment SVOCs, PCBs, Club Laboratories) samples Metals, Pesticides

CDEP-6 Cutter Operating 7/87 (Environmental Laboratories, 1 sediment sample Metals, PCBs Corp. Inc)

CDEP-7 Northeast Utilities 3/85 (Environmental Science 3 sediment samples Metals, PCBs, VOCs Service Co. Corporation) (including 1 composite)

CDEP-8 Materials Testing, 10782 (Materials Testing, Inc.) 2 sediment samples VOCs, PCBs, Metals Inc.

CDEP-9 Management of 9/81 (Environmental Science 4 sediment samples VOCs, PCBs, Metals Resources and Corporation) the Environment

Note?;

I 1. "Lowe r Housatonic River" - Housatonic River mouth at Long Island Sound north to Derby, CT. 2. Data obtained from USEPA on August 2,1996 and from the CDEP on August 6,1996. 1

12/11/96 SYR-T \31161137 WPD I

TABLE 2

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS

SUMMARY OF LOWER HOUSATONIC RIVER SEDIMENT PCB ANALYTICAL DATA

SAMPLE DATA SAMPLING TOTAL PCB IDENTIFICATION SET DATE CONCENTRATION (pptn) BD01* USEPA 1 8/17/94 ND(0.067) I BD02* USEPA 1 11/17/94 ND(0.067J) [NO(0.067J)J BN01 USEPA 1 11/16/94 • 0.144J BN02 USEPA 1 11/16/94 ND(0.083J) BN03 USEPA 1 11/16/94 ND(0.067J) [ND(0.067J)] i; BN04 USEPA 1 11/16/94 ND(0.067J) BN05 USEPA 1 4/18/95 0.050 BN06 USEPA 1 4/18/95 ND(0.067) [ND(0.067)J BN07 USEPA 1 4/18/95 0.032J [0.037 J] BP02* USEPA 1 11/10/94 ND(0.092J) BP05* USEPA 1 11/11/94 2.60J BS01 USEPA 1 8/16/94 1.61 BS02 USEPA 1 4/18/95 0.380 BS02 USEPA 1 11/11/94 0.1 40J BS02 USEPA 1 8/18/94 1.1 [2.77] BS03 USEPA 1 4/18/95 2.20 BS04 USEPA 1 4/18/95 ND(0.330) BS05 USEPA 1 4/18/95 5.70 i BS06 USEPA 1 4/18/95 0.020J BS07 USEPA 1 4/18/96 0.037J CP03* USEPA 1 11/11/94 ND(0.066J) [ND(0.067J)] i CP03* USEPA 1 4/18/95 ND(0.067J) DB03* USEPA 1 4/19/95 3.40 DB04* USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.180 DB06* USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.033J DB07* USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.780 DB10* USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.780 [0.700] ES03* USEPA 1 11/9/94 0.1 10J ES04* USEPA 1 8/15/94 ND(0.420) ES05* USEPA 1 8/15/94 ND(0.340) ES05* USEPA 1 4/18/95 ND(0.067) ES06* USEPA 1 11/17/94 2.20J Esor USEPA 1 11/17/94 0.0406J ES08* USEPA 1 11/17/94 0.186J FP02* USEPA 1 11/10/94 ND(0.240J) GMGr USEPA 1 8/16/94 ND(0.067) GM02* USEPA 1 8/16/94 NO(0.067) GM03* USEPA 1 8/16/94 0.084J [0.100] i GM03* USEPA 1 11/10/94 ND(0.077J) GM04* USEPA 1 11/16/94 ND(0.070J) CMOS' USEPA 1 11/16/94 0.0078J GM06* USEPA 1 11/16/94 ND(0.068J) i USEPA 1 8/16/95 ND<0.067) GM07* CMOS' USEPA 1 8/16/95 ND(0.067) (See Notes on Page 4) f. SYR-T \31061137WB2 PageloM 17-Dec-96 TABLE 2

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY PPTTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS i SUMMARY OF LOWER HOUSATONIC RIVER SEDIMENT PCS ANALYTICAL DATA SAMPLE DATA SAMPLING TOTAL PCB IDENTIFICATION SET DATE CONCENTRATION (pptn) GM15* USEPA1 __, 11/16/94 0.0078J I HB01 USEPA 1 11/10/94 0.062J HB01 USEPA 1 8/17/94 0.700 HB01 USEPA 1 8/9/95 0.120 HB02 USEPA 1 8/9/95 0.120 HB02 USEPA 1 8/17/94 0.750 HB02 USEPA 1 11/10/94 0.075J HB03 USEPA 1 8/17/94 11.90** HB04 USEPA 1 8/17/94 8.90** HB05 USEPA 1 8/17/94 NO(0.067) HB06 USEPA 1 8/8/95 0.01 8J HB06 USEPA 1 8/17/94 0.066J HB07 USEPA 1 8/17/94 0.140 HB08 USEPA 1 11/14/94 ND(0.450) HB09 USEPA 1 8/9/95 ND(0.067) HB09 USEPA 1 11/14/94 ND(0.067) HB10 USEPA 1 11/16/94 1.67J HB10 USEPA 1 8/9/95 0.240 I HB11 USEPA 1 8/9/95 0.250 HB11 USEPA 1 11/16/94 ND(0.068J) HB12 USEPA 1 11/16/94 0.067J I HB12 USEPA 1 8/8/95 0.077J HB13 USEPA 1 11/14/94 0.144 HB14 USEPA 1 11/14/94 ND(0.067) HB15 USEPA 1 11/11/94 0.070J [0.082J] HB16 USEPA 1 4/20/95 0.230 HB17 USEPA 1 4/20/95 0.290 n HB18 USEPA 1 4/20/95 0.061 L HB19 USEPA 1 4/20/95 0.110J HB20 USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.073 HB21 USEPA 1 4/19/95 ND(0.067) HB22 USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.047 HB23 USEPA 1 8/8/95 6.10 HB24 USEPA 1 8/9/95 0.130 HB3A USEPA 1 11/14/94 8.10 HB4A USEPA 1 11/14/94 4.30 HB8A USEPA 1 8/9/95 ND(0.067) HR01 USEPA 1 6/93 ND(NA) I HR02 USEPA 1 6/93 ND(NA) HR03 USEPA 1 6/93 ND(NA) HR04 USEPA 1 6/93 ND(0.041J) HR11 USEPA 1 6/93 ND(0.045J) HR12 USEPA 1 6/93 0.034J (See Notes on Page 4)

SYR-T \31061137WB2 P»g«2of4 17-Dec-96 TABLE 2

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS i SUMMARY OF LOWER HOUSATONIC RIVER SEDIMENT PCS ANALYTICAL DATA SAMPLE DATA SAMPLING TOTAL PCB IDENTIFICATION SET DATE CONCENTRATION (ppm) HR13 USEPA 1 6/93 0.070J I HR14 USEPA 1 6/93 ND(0.310J) HR20 USEPA 1 6/93 ND(0.450J) HR23 USEPA 1 6/93 ND(0.045J) HR24* USEPA 1 6/93 0.740J HR25* USEPA 1 6/93 0.680J HR26* USEPA 1 6/93 0.210 HR27* USEPA 1 6/93 ND(0.100J) HR28 USEPA 1 6/93 0.242J HR29 USEPA 1 6/93 0.191J HR30 USEPA 1 6/93 0.790J HR44 USEPA 6/93 0.066J HR45 USEPA 6/93 0.681J HR46 USEPA 6/93 ND(0.043J) HR47 USEPA 6/93 ND(0.047J) HR48 USEPA 6/93 0.260J MF02* USEPA 4/19/95 0.290 MF03* USEPA 4/17/95 11.00 I MF2D* USEPA 4/17/95 0.240J RF01* USEPA 8/7/95 ND(0.072) RF06* USEPA 8/9/95 0.099 I soor USEPA 8/17/94 0.330 SD04* USEPA 1 8/1 1/94 0.820 SD05* USEPA 1 8/17/94 0.092 SD06* USEPA 1 8/17/94 1.78" SD06* USEPA 1 11/9/94 0.230J SD07* USEPA 1 8/8/95 1.120 SD08* USEPA 1 8/11/94 0.069J SD10* USEPA 1 8/8/95 0.750 SD11 USEPA 1 8/11/94 0.870J SD12* USEPA 1 11/9/94 1.50J SD13* USEPA 1 11/9/94 17.0J SD13* USEPA 1 8/8/95 5.30 SD14* USEPA 1 11/9/94 0.037J SD19* USEPA 1 8/8/95 0.310J[0.110] SD19* USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.111 SD20* USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.071 SD20* USEPA 1 8/8/95 0.890 I SD21" USEPA 1 8/9/95 5.40 [5.40] SD24­ USEPA 1 8/15/95 18.2J SD31* USEPA 1 8/15/95 0.830 i SD32 USEPA 1 8/15/95 0.205 SD33 USEPA 1 8/15/95 4.20 (See Notes on Page 4)

r-.'.

SYR-T \31061137WB2 Pag>3oT4 17-OC-96 TABLE 2

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY PfTTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS

SUMMARY OF LOWER HOUSATONIC RIVER SEDIMENT PCB ANALYTICAL DATA

SAMPLE DATA SAMPLING TOTAL PCB IDENTIFICATION SET DATE CONCENTRATION (ppm) SD34 USEPA 1 5/1 5/95 0.310 I SD35 USEPA 1 5/15/95 0.310 S036 USEPA 1 8/16/95 0.130 SD37 USEPA 1 8/16/95 ND(0.067) SD3S USEPA 1 8/15/95 0.560 SP04* USEPA 1 4/20/95 ND(0.340) [ND(0.058)] nor USEPA 1 4/19/95 0.027J [ND(0.066)] F TI02* USEPA 1 8/10/94 ND(0.068) WP04* USEPA 1 11/10/94 ND(0.067J) [ND(0.066J)] WP08* USEPA 1 11/15/94 ND(0.067) WP09' USEPA 1 11/15/94 ND(0.067) r A&B (Composite) CDEP-1 1/18/95 ND(0.010) C&D (Composite) CDEP-1 1/18/95 ND(0.010) TPA-1 CDEP-2 4/26/94 ND(0.01) TPA-2 CDEP-2 4/26/94 ND(0.01) TPA-3 CDEP-2 4/26/94 ND(0.01) TPA-4 CDEP-2 4/26/94 ND(0.01) TPA-5 CDEP-2 4/26/94 ND(0.01) TPA-6 CDEP-2 4/26/94 ND(0.01) TPA-7* CDEP-2 4/26/94 ND(0.01) P1-P7 CDEP-3 12/15/92 ND(0.1) P8-P12 CDEP-3 12/21/92 ND(0.1) Station 1 CDEP-4 5/18/92*** 0.017 Station J CDEP-4 5/18/92*** 0.19 Station Q CDEP-4 5/18/92*** 0.084 A (Composite) CDEP-5 3/25/92 ND(0.010) B (Composite) CDEP-5 3/25/92 ND(0.010) 87-0418 CDEP-6 4/20/87 ND(O.OS) 1-7 (Composite) CDEP-7 3/28/85 ND(1.0) 8 CDEP-7 3/28/85 ND(1.0) 9 CDEP-7 3/28/85 ND(I.O) 1A CDEP-8 10/12/82 1.8 2A CDEP-8 10/12/82 2.0 Station 1 CDEP-9 9/24/81 0.014 Station 2 CDEP-9 11/23/81 0.161 Stations CDEP-9 9/24/81 0.048 Station 4 CDEP-9 9/24/81 0.059

Notes: 1. Refer to Figure 1 for illustration of sampling locations. 2. ND - Not Detected 3. NA - Not Available 4. J - Estimated concentration or detection limit. 5. [ ]- Duplicate Sample 6. '( )-Detection Limit 7 * - Sampling location not provided by USEPA or CDEP and not indicated on Figure 1. 8. ** - Secondary dilution factor used to obtain analytical results 9. ***-Extracted date 10. USEPA Data Set obtained through the United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region I, Boston, MA. CDEP Data Set obtained through the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Hartford, CT. 11. Aroclor-specific PCB concentration information is available for USEPA data in Attachment 1 and for Data Set CDEP-2 in Attachment 2. SYR-TO1061137WB2 Pag»4o»4 17-D8C-96 I i I

F C

Figures

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC. I engineers & scientists r'i fe a

I I li f. '1«% Derby Dan ^^JtS^i *L- wvn*r xj*

Stratford

mMm>m

LEGEND:

• TPA-2 = Sediment sampling location.

NOTES: 1. Sampling locations are approximate.

2. Sampling locations are plotted based upon information provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection.

3. Base Map was scanned from USGS mapping. Source: USGS Quads. New Haven Co., and Fairfield Co. (South Half) Conn., 1980.

4. The "Lower Housatonic River" is defined as the Housatonic River from its mouth at Long Island Sound North to Derby, CT.

APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1 = 8000'

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Lower Housatonic River PITTSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS

Area Enlargement LOWER HOUSATONIC RIVER SCALE IN MILES SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATIONS

FIGURE FrMt, C.R., Surtmey, & L Kulp, K.P., ind Fmttte, C.G.. Po(ychor1r»t»d Bphonyti In Hamtonlc River Sediments In MawchuHtti ind CanwcDcut: D«tormlnitk3n, DtaWbulton. md Tnntport: BUWki BOO (Conmcdojl Agricultural BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC. 1»M (YltOM-OJH Exptrtnunt Station; Dsctmbur ia«Z). engineer! ft tolentlttt 1 I

1 I Ei n

Attachments

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC. I engineer] & 5 c / e n f / s f s

L I i I i I r

. Attachment1 I Data Set-USEPA-1 (Lower Housatonlc River Sediment Sampling Information Provided by the United States • Environmental Protection Agency • Region 1, Boston, MA - August 2,1999)

BLASIAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC. englnoors ft lolentliti

i i E

\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 8 REGION I f JOHN F.KENNEDY FEDERAL BUILDING BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02203-0001 e August 2, 1996 Mr. Russell Houck, Project Engineer I Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. 6723 Towpath Road P.O. Box 66 Syracuse, NY 13214-0066

Re: Raymark Industries, Inc. Superfund Site; Stratford, CT Housatonic River PCB Data

Dear Mr. Houck:

Please find enclosed the available information you requested in your June 20, 1996 letter regarding the subject PCB data which was collected as part of EPA investigations into contamination from the Raymark Site.

The enclosed PCB data represents sediment sampling conducted within and along the lower Housatonic River during June 1993 by I EPA Region I personnel, and from August 1994 - August 1995 by EPA's contractor, Halliburton NUS. The enclosed map shows the location and corresponding sediment sample identification number I which relates to the enclosed PCB-CLP data. Furthermore, note that all of the analytical work was performed by Compuchem Environmental Corporation on the 1994 and 1995 sediment samples, and that all the analytical work for the June 1993 samples was performed by RECRA Environmental Incorporated. Finally, due to the limited nature of your request, there is no costs associated with the copying or preparation of the enclosed response.

If you have any questions on the enclosed information, please do not hesitate to call me at (617) 573-5786. y Sincerely, i Michael Jasinski Raymark Team Leader i Enclosure cc: Michael Hill, Remedial Project Manager

Recycled/Recyclable Pnnted with Sov/CanoU Ink on paper that contains at least 75% recycled fiber E •— a. &. 3 1 "E 8 i o « u at 1 S 07/10/96 0 «• "S. x • e « ^9 U S S s K» <» K 3> — uat B- • _l C « ^j S ^ Z in i S m M • * «• 0 X U 25 S85 CD « S — in • 1 ^ V C -g 5 U x X *« ° _ s *v. 3 i | §* S S c* u 2 § 1 M «^ Kt C «i I s -» 10 "! O 3 m **! * a •* • >- w o 5 O o s § § U p«. * 5 !•> ^ g 5 < *"* (J p» < i S ^) !•. * p*» U < a ^O *t W 1 t 5 « j 1. IA S u> S g in EUO C _l z 1 x S i o O a C « 3 N. K) 0 -• s. 3 g 8 fe L. K " • < Kl o u o 0 < «rf E u. < (A v> § i e/> -O o * in < 1 u. E < v> E

§ 8 id

g

a § 13c *at 8 •o

§ li 8 r\J

us

•6o

^ ^ ^ ^ V S t> — •fl — -8 •­ 1> }aJ >1 X« tl _J X

Si- •a sa " Ife f

ru

• • 1

-,^38 r» - 8 3 3 3 O s? o rg ™ ->^-» O "'~'SO O CO5 8 8 § g SO 0 0 O Q • - 3 < oc u> o n . -5 * o ^ ^ S S 5S 5 R 5 U) X CD M 3 (M».-o<->*m<»N

J O ro ro f^ 5( • • "tO s ro ro «- 10 S

o i -1 O ee s S 1 . - -• -• -• g § s • = • 1 5 CO •**• O — 1 W O O o • • N. u § § § . S ro to in o Q ™ ^ ^ ^J 2 < oe Q 9 • • • • «o eo g ro ro ^* rfl CA Z 0 to 3

OB

1

1 _-l ro ro r^ a • • • ro 8 u ro ro •- ro u TJ &s o. ^ O u s 3S3 = = = = = 0 ~* ~" "• o S s s O 0 0 oooooooo S (VI fw . s 8 s £ s MininiftWfn^j^ • • • o 4 QC W O 9 «» ro «M f^ in x a 55 3 rsj'^^-J'OJoa**^*'

ro ro r». a . . . K> ro ro •- ro i i i S

£s Ks 52 ^ ^ ^ M (O (/> 01 t r>j i ro * O s :§ « « xS Hl» xA -L. *X Cl V 0 8 S g § § i 5E *«* 5E «** S.O 5C _5C utt s •o < x> < « < U ^3 ^J ^ 4 ^* < M < VI < V) x o at ac >. C •*• M ^ «^ o i. ^ « • re L. CJ U. CJ **. O **• xo-**r • o < < 07/10/9 6 -*•»»< 5 5 i I

F i i o L I i I O I ^ I IM IM on N eo r\i eg

f- u u. cj i*. o «t R co 8 8 § o *. 8 S <» _; CM —•- **k • f^ S S p at e o o • ui eg (A 5 ^ ^ •- in »- » 1 8 1

« O a Of U s

•» o 3 » 5 8 8 8 o S S oc 5 o o o • o5 v> «o 5 r-.' m

£ I g

o s

•* •* 8 § 2 O O • • CM S. . -: ~ § « % § ° « g 3 K. in CO Kl •- CM £ g s y

s s

i in IA nj S « i •fl ~" C CD a u 1 s T3 CM co a t. -a & U -I >• O CM rsi —< s "S. o o ~* t> o fr • f 9 i 5 t • £ s sr sr a. o o Dieldri n 4,A'-DD E I

I S 3 8 S S 5 S

-, S

00•* 8• §• 8. t ^ SS I « m ^ •* rt

I B C 8 8 ioo^Sn in o • £ • • «M »­ rsi CM «- N.

S o o 5 5 ou uo >e­ i 3. >»" "S I

! i i

1 S 3 3 3 1 ? S 2 f" 1 I 2 8 3 CM •* •*

a • K) Kl BC r u U i : > 1C g g §

< ec en o o> • I (0 9C CO U) 5 2 3 3 C/l i•" iB>

fs. *i^ ­Ow- S u •- K> K> § p 5 Li a*>.

§ -1 -> E2 " s fc "" s "* ­' (M o a > S ^ < <£ « q w «v rM ' O i «­ L. C 1- X O> CM O Kl •- Kl y o 4> — •8 "• -5 u S « 1 Sx SA682 7 SA6828 ­ PCBs :

Ms. Margaret Leshen November 14, 1994 Page Five RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE DAS No. 0004N, SDG DAN048 TABLE 1 - QUALIFICATION SUMMARY

I Sample # Pest/PCBs

DAN048 A1 DAN050 A1

DAN051 A1 DAN052 A1 DAN054 A1 DAN058 A1 DAN060 A1­ 4 DAN062 A1 DAN068 A1 DAN070 A1 DAN072 A1 DAN074 A1

DAN077 A1'2 DAN078 A1'2 DAN080 A1 DAN082 A1 DAN084 A1

DAN086 A1 DAN090 A1 DAN092 A1'3 I

Ms. Margaret Leshen November 14, 1994 Page Six

A1 - Accept the data, however estimate the results for 6-BHC, y-BHC, Aldrin, Dieldrin, 4,4'-DDE, Endrin, 4,4'-DDT, Methoxychlor, 7-Chlordane, and Endosulfan Sulfate due to low PE sample recoveries. The results may be biased low or I indicate false negatives. A2 - Accept the data, however estimate the results for Endrin Aldehyde, cr-Chlordane, Heptachlor n Epoxide, and 4,4'-DDE due to poor field duplicate precision. A3 - Accept the data, however report the CRQL for Methoxychlor due to blank contamination. A* - Accept the data, however report the CRQL for Endrin ketone due to PE sample contamination. The reported result might be a false positive. i: I I

I I I

I

333333333333333^33333 ss 133333333 h. N. S. F« *. K. h. N. K) Kt Kl Kl Kt Kt Kl Kl Kl h- h- O si • • • -N-KIN-KIKIKIKIKIKIKI r OM

o i o oin M ™» 1 ~» "» 33333333^-»-l-«-i: in o o »« »- CM M -O - >O «O O • < i i i in in o o o Si! ^ XJ O >» QQ CM -O • r- • 5 5 in N. o o o

I sss S2SS3

Ml —Q tf> h- z -4 UI *~ * X < _l OT UI CL 111 S ui UI I o ilw ° < _1 - a o O O i^.ii Ul — •< a. ui u i32?5555??? E

Ms. Margaret Leshen October 28, 1994 Page Five

RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE i DAS NO . 0004N, SDG DAN095 TABLE 1 - QUALIFICATION SUMMARY

Sample # Pest/PCBs i DAN095 A1-- 2 6 DAN096 A1-- 2 6

1 DAN098 A1

DAN119 A2

DAN121 A2 1-1 DAN123 A2-3 DAN125 A2- 3'6

I DAN126 A2-3 1 DAN127 A2'3 DAN129 A2-3 ra 3 1 DAN 131 A DAN133 A2-3

0 DAN135 A2

DAN137 A6

DAN140 A2'3'4

2 3 4 <..' DAN141 A -- DAN 14 4 A3 1 3 5 DAN146 A -

DAN148 A1-2 1 52 DAN150 A2'3 Ms. Margaret Leshen October 28, 1994 Page Six

A1 - Accept the data, however report the CRQL for Methoxychlor due to blank contamination. A2 - Accept the data, however estimate the result I for Endosulfan II due to low PE sample recovery . A3 - Accept the data, however report the CRQL for 7~Chlordane due to blank contamination. A4 - Accept the data, but estimate the results for Endrin Aldehyde, Aroclor 1262, and Aroclor 1268 due to poor field duplicate precision. A5 - Accept the data, but estimate the positive result for Endosulfan II due to poor field duplicate precision. A6 - Accept the data, however report the CRQL for Endrin Ketone due to PE sample contamination. Reported values may be false positives. E

0 , 4 ca M O O O O • -o •^ -» « « 33 33333-*"^ •»•» 333333333 •« K. ** K> CO in 3333h 3 - 0 0 £ a

o CM s J-~T~* i • Ul 3 ~> ^ i < i = >:'=) = >0=)::> = >"«:3 = > =>='=>3= = >=>=>3333333 O* O* O* O* fO O* O* 9* *t ^"* ^« ^* r^ p» ^* 9 OO ^K ^ O O O o • T i *T < • N. CO OO O> 5 0 r- N. O O O I 0 s* s » at » A sn »._._._^_«_2.__ -^ •^ •, -^ ^ h. ^r eo =3 => => 3== =) X »- IM •— ilililrwilrlilSo « m^MMioin M M C i^ o O • t » t ac 5 • m co co 0* 5 0 •- >»• o o o

o 1 ** >» >*" r ^ i o- o o 3 3 33331 33333 33 3 N. Kl »­ g pj = « t- ru rj ^ KNN.o.N.N.S.^O.-KjfnroWM^rnwo.^o^^^^^^^oo 2 • *o co eo o* 5 2 — -O O O O r o o o o o sf N- •* CO • lf\ CO CO &• v r*j O O o

0 I i (M 5 -, § s s 3333333333^^333 3 ^^-33 _ . _ . -o o> ~ si = ( ;s=;a ( 3;:) ] J= X •- «- OJ r^r.s.r~N-h-N.^KiKi»-»-roK>K«i>^MinoK.O(^|^^M^i^MM^ O • i ' i • N- 00 OOO­ i at o ^- CM 0 0 0 o i S 3 oe

6> S a =)3i3 = iZiZ=>33=):s3 "a" = = = 3333 =3 = • o co co o» x3uj •- N- O 0 0 u o ~

3 a (> SS 1 1 1 Q (X UJ 333->3(Nj333 ->T->a . ;j = 3.3 ->3333333_) 333 •o o> in J^ T- ^- r— • 5 u. »O*O*OO^OK»'O*O^^O*IA'OOO«OOOOOOOpOO O - i i t • o CO CO 0s m N. o o o

O) s0 ^^ u ui o a o i VI — O UJO g ae ui uj uj H- 3 -J *— r*J VI > i|§ tj 1- 0. 0 X­ -sill z aez X X < < t- < -J VI S Ul UJ Q UJ O, Ul — *- 1— UJ i _,3 -J X O UJ uj 1- Z < UJ >­ — O •• 3 UJ O I— < 2 a 2 < -J U < O —• O — ae Q 8 o ^ a z z ouj OB U "> u ae ""3 ae x * S >o— r\j»iro goe z z z _i i— Q a O O(\jCMr>j(M(MCMiMr\j Ul ^* O X *_* XI X ™J J ^ Z UJ ifc O *^ ^ O ^ ^t X X Z cgxcaoax z _j —o _i a _i Q >• uuuioe«aea|a|9egeaea: s«§ icai •uacu3(ieaz3a3oxzzi >xooooooooo t- Ul Ul 1— l/» UJ — < -iuiiuzz >z -uiacae-' u E

o g

.

f «o >» to o*l7~7 in• N.*- o00 o00 oO

I

82 S r^ N. h. fc N. c o «o «- 10 o *- -o f* =3 r ii . o|v oCO oCO oO>

§ s 3 3 § »-• «-o oco ooo <»o

o 3 O O. si- eo i in oo c o> • IM o o o i i

82 3 3 3 -> 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 O • i i i K, • i «- ro o o o s 2 SSSS o ^.tfcSSR, N. GO ^ ^ a h- N> r»

O i I 33333333 82 QQ o OO O OOOOOOOO o • o o o o o> •oo o«-oooooo • N. eo co o» o E si oo • o r>J«-r\j.-.-«--­ in N- o o o o L

i So' I UI O O O o ui O S OC UJ UI 111

>• Crt-Irt < 5 ^ < j -J IU g "" O w> 2 z 2 x < 5 111 UJ »« »— »~ UJ I !- Z < lil I— 3 UI O i— < O - o o ooj(MiM- o O < < o < o Z U X X 8_l .JuTaEUJ u.o m f m m x x -i — Q -j S 0 u ui eje of ge of « at at at at

Ms. Margaret Leshen October 10, 1994 Page Six RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE DAS No. 0004N, SDG DAN002 TABLE 1 - QUALIFICATION SUMMARY

Sample # Pest/PCBs

DAN002 A1 DAN004 J1 DAN006 A2 DAN008 A DAN010 A DAN012 J1 DAN014 A3 DAN016 A DAN022 A DAN026 A DAN029 A4 DAN030 J1 DAN032 A DAN034 J1 DAN036 A5

DAN039 A5

DAN041 A5 DAN043 J2 DAN045 J1 DAN046 A Ms. Margaret Leshen October 10, 1994 Page Seven

A - Accept the data unqualified. i A1 - Accept the data, however estimate the non- detected result for Endosulfan Sulfate due to I poor field duplicate precision. A2 - Accept data, but estimate the positive results for Endosulfan Sulfate and 4,4/-DDT due to poor field duplicate precision. A3 - Accept data, but estimate the positive result for Aldrin due to poor matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate recoveries. The reported result may be biased low. Also estimate the positive results for 4,4'-DDE and methoxychlor due to low precision in the matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate analyses. A4 - Accept data, but estimate the results for Dieldrin, 4,4'-ODD, 4,4'-DDT, and Endrin Aldehyde due to poor field duplicate I precision. A3 - Accept data, but report the CRQL for g- Chlordane due to blank contamination. I Jl - Estimate all detected and reject all non- detected results due to low percent solids in the sample aliquot. J2 - Estimate all detected and reject all non- detected results due to low percent solids in 6 the sample aliquot. i I f [

000 3D3333 _^-ri.<> a ix IM (••. -jr K mo o>oooooooooo o "•'•'• ~ (L Of Q *~»~*~*"*1 ~*"fO^B w"*O*MOJf%J(\JfO^ in^OOO I <>• ( -» ^ «•» ^ ^ ^ —* ^ wt co ^>* »-%» mo o o o o»»»i I • • . « *>o^f* o ^ *r>jcaeoo^

o o o

ro «o ~* o • V T T • • o>­ • IM CO CO O* aeaeocaeaeaeaeaeacoacacixacacKacaeKicieiKocacacaeaeiKixaeo in^ooo

-^ -»-»-* ^ sstist L 3C ^ ••••••• • i ••••• • irt • • • • fw p^ BQ ^o fO ro ro PO PO po • o oo oo ^

§ ^^^^^N|KK»K1IOin«K»Kl^««^^p.

xaex . ofiuooo O ai S OCKUIUJIU — CD — I- O _1 >— rM >- I >­ u i- a. u >­ 3iS 2 = Mg 5 * uiXiu i- at < ui >­ —• o •• <^ < o t— QzaXOTU — < _ ^-8»,0 g ^^SSS SS ui— — M aeaEEo S O ui qez z x .j^-o g O< IU u.OU.fr-UM• uuuiotgcgfecgcgcacaeac aacoxaaaoxaczi ixooooooooo I

Ms. Margaret Leshen January 12, 1995 Page Five RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE CASE No. 0009N, SDG: DAN249 i TABLE 1 - QUALIFICATION SUMMARY 1 Sample # Pest/PCBs r DAN249 J1 h DAN254 J1 r DAN255 j«« DAN257 J1 r: DAN260 J1'2 r, DAN266 A1'4 '• DAN268 A1-4 1 DAN270 A2'4 DAN271 A4 1 DAN273 A4 DAN274 A4 % 1 DAN275 A4 i DAN276 A3'4 DAN279 A4 i DAN281 A4 i DAN283 A4 j w 4 t DAN284 A 1 DAN286 A4 DAN287 A4

^^H DAN288 A4 f

Ms. Margaret Leshen January 12, 1994 Page Six

A1 - Accept data but, estimate positive and non-detected e results for endosulfan II; 4,4'-ODD; 4,4'-DDT; aroclor 1262; and aroclor 1268 due to low field duplicate i precision. A2 - Accept data but, change positive result for gamma BHC to a revised detection limit due to blank contamination. A3 - Accept data but, change positive results for endosulfan sulfate and methoxychlor to a revised detection limit due r to blank contamination. A4 - Accept data but, estimate the non-detected results for endosulfan I and endosulfan II due to low PE recovery. J1 - Estimate the positive and non-detected results due to exceeded holding times. The reported values might be I: biased low. J2 - Estimate the results and change the positive results for gamma BHC and endosulfan sulfate due to blank I contamination. J3 - Estimate the results and change the positive results for I methoxychlor due to blank contamination.

F­ IM «rrr«-r^?'0 = = "* -» ?. 3 _ = 333333333 — «M ! ' 3E ^ r^ ^* r*» ^ ^^ flo "^ ^ ^ ™ pn ^ ro i/i _ po PO o PO o _ ^_ _ ^ ^ ^ __^ o 52

in xCD —Of 5-~T o»-^ ^fo '«< TT-l-»T-^ >»•>,•>« 55^ 33333 333~>31 3 «»^O 8 ~. «.^.«r. «>l. JO I _3 _ 3333333->-> ^CMS i uj in^N-s.oOh-or'-s-^Ki KiKiinKiinKif\Ji_ _,_ , < O «-•-•- O »- O »- O » KI fM «- •- «- •­ I CM -I

f- IM t . fl ,_. si 2^.^^'>-~•*"'""•''•"•""<>­oo''>° F i^ g

ininmiAinininin uiuiooooooooooooooo o o ro-o-O'O>oo

I

I s E a s i -J- UJ 88:: i

IM f. O Q. Ik I > ) 1 > > o -»-«-»->-i ">.,_,_,_, -,^" _,_J-,"'" " " '2~ "" SIM 33~*33eo33in • at (M(M (MIM • •

Ji

%^ u 2 z oe ac uioeooo V) •«> O UJ O QCOtULUUJ — —CD— 3 >— .j »— r4 c/>«r-Zl— ^ tJ O. CJ >­ ^««* • icjujaeocaeaeQeeeneoeae i >uacu3aeaac3uacu3aeaac3o3axaeai E • xooooooooo <<<~i>QQ**o^f»—OOOL: UJ ~- < _iujuj

S3 =)33 e si N-plN-flOTKimKIKIKI

i 333 ^ ^ 3 "• £38 mi^mMfOK»w«fn o» • «- »- l»IK»MO--

n s

> o O >• »* *s ._. _ l

f- (M »­ KI~'K»KI 3 iti*- in in o 33 a33 3 3 •»K1^POKtl*>fOK> •o • «- ^ r>j I! s •T-KiMM-*(M"-K»ro^t>-»-rO'OmiiOKiioro 33 i i (M

c

«*. «-. o 83, 3 3 33 «-

a S L l qc 0 a 0 in — a ui o ae o U4 iu in i 3 C- -1 »- M t— O O, U >­ ^ w o> «><£<_! DC < O 1- Z £ z x «;- O i 3 a t- < O z x =: S° "- S S -O'-rvjouto-jorM uujqeoeoc«geaeacceq( u o ac •zOOOOOOOOO tn *- u> ui — < a. ui u I

Ms. Christine Clark January 24, 1995 Page Five

RAYMARK INDUSTRIES , INC. SITE f DAS Case No . 0009N, SDG DAN201 1 TABLE I ­ QUALIFICATION SUMMARY • Sample # Pesticides/PCBs { u DAN201 A F DAN214 A1 DAN215 A2 '­ DAN217 A f: DAN224 A 1 ^ DAN225 J 1 DAN226 J2 DAN227 J2 1 DAN228 J1 DAN230 J1 1 1 DAN231 J1

1 f DAN232 J DAN233 J1 IT I: DAN236 J2 r DAN238 J2 y DAN241 J2 1 DAN243 J2 DAN245 J1 1 DAN247 J1 pr. I

Ms. Christine Clark January 24, 1995 Page Six e A - Accept the data without qualification. A1 - Accept the data, however estimate the results for 7-BHC, Endrin Aldehyde, Endosulfan II, i 7-Chlordane, and Aroclor 1268 due to poor field duplicate precision. t 2 A - Accept the data, however estimate the results for Endosulfan II, -y-BHC, and Aroclor 1268 due to poor field duplicate precision. Also, report the CRQL for Methoxychlor due to blank contamination. k J1 - Estimate the positive and the non-detected results due to exceeded extraction holding r times. J2 - Estimate the positive and the non-detected i results due to exceeded extraction holding times. In addition, report the CRQL for i Methoxychlor due to blank contamination. « --=.3 1 i3333-»-i33-»3 ^3-i-»-i3-i->22~'~»"»~ O O* ** CM f>J l ^3 33333333*1 X*-*-fM — QklMr\JfMfMN(\Jf\J.«r VJh>.r>J

8* si ? 2

s 8

KI 333333 T3333333l3->333T3^^^->->TO •• S l'"'> '!5{'l ^!J2!52!$!S^^^* »CM^»^-^­

? IM 3 iCM 1 -I ** -^ -t ^ -»^T-»-n-^->->-J-J ix ^mmommmin IAIM K.

55 r>5.t> «»­ •^^™»^*»g ^-»^™> ^ •n iii OK» SS^ISSSS^l 3 - »"»"^'^3 -»"»3^->-n"^l"^-™«-»-s (>«•<> <««M O OO 3~ > 33333333 MOCMO

» O »- CM o' .1,1.1

si

i.i u ai o z oc ac ac iu o o M»acaiuo agciuiui »i»>>^2»^ o i— ft u : >• w> at •— < 3 < < ­ atatacae-iiu— atXx< <^IU<.^tfl OIUIU (AXOIU^IU M^»~| _i 3 cj _j x o iu iu >- at < ui i — o 3 •• o. < a •­ 3iuo>-< atSoXMu — < _ju• S <

^i i >- O> - qe o u u u o o< < < ariu-j-J-Jui^^»-»-»-»-»-^'- o^OO xuxx«j .jifeaciu i*-oi^^~iJM —a _i o ­i a >- uuuiaeacacgeaeaeaeaeae u < •a>'XOoooooooo ^ iu 3 iu z«r-XH-K»-o^-«p-p­ a. ut ­J u < ca o u x < x i i e i r i

i -* •* •*

a i z Su. O5f SO i (M o

< 1*1 — "t^^^-^^"*"^ -i ^ "i -» •"» -» ??? O«»< 333 3 3 3 ~> 33 3 -» -» 3 -»->3-l-»TT-»->-i-j-j ,00"!t. i3« ~l^l>:h:::'>:'>:K:0:Z'Tn^M.c:^K;~<0.«g^:s^^^"

r oI o^ »»» 855 S 3333333i3^33-,^''3«^">3333333333 8 5l" <=------•

I*

L § S < o ^. z ae J | o •• •• •• •• I J-l PI i-SS2 Z3 _iS>­ o h- a. o u.< —en 2ac ac< g ­ _i cj < — OC O O UJ O. a. 5 •• Z ™" "" auuigqe^iMM^^ii/i^ aui>-« < OoS ox u ux ox 5_i S-i a>iiuzu3aeoz3o3oxzzix m 09 x x _i —a _i o -i a >- uui _ .. qe ..

RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE DAS Case No. 0009N, SDG DAN298 TABLE I - QUALIFICATION SUMMARY

Sample # Pesticides/PCBs

DAN298 J1­ 2 DAN311 J1­ 2 DAN312 J1 DAN313 J1­ 3 DAN315 J1­ 3 DAN316 J1 DAN317 J1 DAN318 J1 DAN319 J1 DAN320 J1­ 2 DAN321 J1 ­ 3 DAN325 J1 DAN326 J1­ 4

DAN327 J1­ 2 DAN328 J1 DAN329 J1­ 3 f

Ms. Margaret Leshen January 11, 1995 Page Six

J1 - Estimate both the positive and the non- detected results due to missed holding times. J2 - Estimate the data, and report the CRQL for I Endrin Aldehyde due to blank contamination. J3 - Estimate the data, and report the CRQL for Heptachlor Epoxide due to blank contamination. J4 - Estimate the result for Aroclor 1254 due to questionable instrument linearity.

I I

I I o

sf i •~r-r-.r-.r~.rv-r--F-c>.<\j.OK>K

g I i N

33333333333 •O in o !i X «- rvi K> 52 «•• OO *"* *"• *^ g o i in S; •O in o as «- ru KI

*o mco ! «- (M O

sI I o >O vn tt *-

.. . •O tn o X T-

u8

? .! v u : ai Q o a a uj o g CE UJ UU UJ u> »> uU t- a. • >• u> x to < >— z z « x z * ... x < < ut>- IUz S< s "~ z S o uIU O I—< a< S — X a O en ea * u u ac ui >• of o Q < O O — of h- o

vt t- _i c-> • .• r>•- »-• K.• h.• K.• P.. « « Nt ft 10 K•l K•l r^ K•l K•t O• ii •- ^ »- O «— ^«-^K1KIK1K>MPOK»^-K»IO

s ^•^^••••^^^•^^T^^^TT -» -^ *n T ^ IV 3333333333333^ g ^ 3 3 3 g g -> -1 5 -> -• -> 8S 3 K h. S. r>. r*. h. S. Ni f> M 10 K) K» «- «- N. N• K•l (M• N.• NO. ro N.KI ~"

O O O p«* in i— fiIt~ to ^rZ«^^^^o X *- fM O ao eo «> «] a a •> 00 in in w> in ut <5 ut KI K> !/•< 00 eo o o O • > < < ainominincMinintn « >O ^~ «— tM »-K>h«KiMi'»rgroioKi S* CM 3 at S < r» ca (\« 8 to a. o 33333333 = X •- rj o x 3 ui •h»»'lh»K1MK!K»K)rOK1 So. «-IO-OIOM(*IKIKIdfl

I 2 -» ?«3 33333333 -133 -» 3333;»-»->->->->->->-J aws1 i = ='=> = WKl 45oc a " K»M

•* 0 < 8 I «-K, fO O O O 33 • • • •N­ OK>OO*­

-^ in o 33333 X ^ rj ro tnmaoaoo s; eo • • • •tot 3

S5S * 33333333^ 33333^:

3 ^ S S ? .£ I v*0 S LU Q Q O ui — at ae LU uj LU S>— 3 —i t- isj en -> o i- a. o >­ >- v> x ea < w» z < -J —i ui ui o u. —3 ae < < - _<5 Q w K- 2e st * x < a-J. tVtu t- Z < UJ H­ 3 tu a >- < u -i u < 3 82 u> UJ UJ Uf — ae o o o z z a w < UJ >- < < = 3 O 3 uj at ae ui ^ ae a •< O xu u xuc. x -j8 _j83 u.! z ui u.< a u.< >- uxt ^:' •« af ^ § _U .. at .. h- UI O UJ

DANS55 A4

DAN557 A4

DANS6 6 A3'4

DANS6 7 A4

DANS6 9 A4

DAN570 A1'2'4

DANS7 2 A4

DAN578 A4

DANS7 9 A4

DAN580 A4

DAN581 A4

DAN582 A4

DANS8 3 A4

DAN584 A4

DANS8 5 A4

DANS8 6 A4

DANS8 7 A4

DANS8 9 A4

DAN592 J1 I

Ms. Christine Clark June 5, 1995 Page Six A1 - Accept data but, reject (R) non-detected results for gamma- BHC and endrin due to 0% matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate recovery. i A2 - Accept data but, estimate positive results for endrin aldehyde due to %RSD greater than 50% between the MS/MSD and I unspiked sample. A3 - Accept data but, estimate positive results for endosulfan sulfate, alpha-Chlordane and gamma-Chlordane due to poor field duplicate precision. A* - Accept data but, estimate positive and non-detected results for aroclor-1260 due to poor performance evaluation sample results. J1 - Estimate the positive and non-detected results due to exceeded holding times. Also, estimate aroclor-1260 due to poor PE sample results. I I

I PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANALYSIS CASE No: 0020N • ­ SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT •OG No: OAN566 LABORATORY: COHPUCHEH ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

cPA SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN555 OAN557 DAN566 OAN567 DAN569 SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SO-HB22-03 RM-SD-HB21-03 RM-SD-TI01-03 RM-SO-TI01-03 RM-SD-MF02-03 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 705077 705078 704108 704112 704113 SAMPLE TYPE: FIELD SAMPLE Field Sample Field Dupl. (D2) Field Dupl. (02) Field Sample MATRIX/ANALYSIS: SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 33 46 30 18 52 DATE SAMPLED: 04/19/95 04/19/95 04/17/95 04/17/95 04/17/95 i DAT E EXTRACTED: 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/22/95 04/22/95 04/22/95 DATE ANALYZED: 05/06/95 05/06/95 05/04/95 05/04/95 05/17/95

I alpha-BH C 0.18 J 1.7 U 0.14 J 0.11 J 0.72 J beta-BHC 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 8.6 U delta-BHC 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 8.6 U gamma -BHC (Lindane) 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 8.6 U Heptachlor 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 4.8 J Aldrin 1.7 U 0.13 J 1.7 U 1.7 U 8.6 U Heptachlor epoxide 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.1 J Endosulfan I 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 8.6 U Dieldrin 0.27 J 0.11 J 0.24 J 0.31 J 1.1 J 4, 4' -DOE 2.2 J 0.70 J 0.95 J 0.33 J 17 U Endrin 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 9.8 J Endosulfan II 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 17 U 4, 4' -ODD 3.3 0.75 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 15 J Endosulfan sulfate 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.6 J 1.8 J 17 U 4,4'-OOT 1.7 J 0.36 J 0.80 J 0.14 J 17 U Methoxychlor 17 U 17 U 17 U 1.7 J 86 U Endrin ketone 3.3 U 3.3 U 0.13 J 3.3 U 17 U Endrin aldehyde 2.1 J 0.79 J 0.99 J 0.19 J 16 J alpha-Chlordane 1.1 J 0.44 J 4.3 J 1.5 J 3.8 J gamma- Ch I ordane 0.64 J 0.19 J 4.8 J 1.6 J 17 Toxaphene 170 U 170 U 170 U 170 U 860 U Aroclor-1016 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 170 U Aroclor-1221 67 U 67 U 66 U 66 U 340 U Aroc lor- 1232 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 170 U Aroc tor- 1242 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 170 U -oc I or- 1248 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 170 U I oclor-125 4 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 170 U ,<-oclor-1260 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 170 UJ Aroclor-1262 47 33 U 27 J 33 U 170 U Aroclor-1268 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 290 I FILENAME : DAN566.SDG DATE: 05/25/95 PAGE: 1 Water units are reported in ug/L. i Soil units are reported in ug/Kg. PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANALYSIS CASE No: 0020N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT SDG No: DAN566 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEH ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION <:PA SAMPLE NUMBER: DANS 70 OAN572 DANS78 DAN579 DANS80 AMPLE LOCATION: RM-SO-MF2D-03 RM-SD-MF03-03 RM-SO-BS02-03 RM-SD-BN06-03 RM-SD-BN06-03 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 704114 704115 704117 704118 704119 SAMPLE TYPE: Field Sample Field Sample Field Sample Field Dupl. (03) Field Dupl. (03) MATRIX/ANALYSIS: SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 34 59 62 77 30 DATE SAMPLED: 04/17/95 04/17/95 04/18/95 04/18/95 04/18/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 04/22/95 04/22/95 04/22/95 04/22/95 04/22/95 i DAT E ANALYZED: 05/04/95 05/17/95 05/05/95 05/05/95 05/05/95

alpha-BHC 0.13 J 0.26 J 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U beta-BHC 0.16 J 8.5 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U I deUa-BH C 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U gamma-BHC (Lindane) R 0.54 J 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Heptachlor 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Aldrin 1.7 U 6.0 J 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Heptachlor epoxide 0.29 J 3.5 U 0.36 J 1.7 U 1.7 U Endosutfan I 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Dieldrin 3.3 U 28 8.6 3.3 U 3.3 U 4,4'-DDE 1.8 J 7.2 J 0.60 J 2.2 J 0.72 J i— Endrin R 180 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U Endosulfan II 3.3 U 17 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 4, 4' -ODD 3.3 U 42 5.0 3.3 U 3.3 U Endosulfan sulfate 3.3 U 17 U 3.3 U 0.57 J 3.3 U 4, 4' -DDT 1.3 J 17 U 1.8 J 3.3 U 3.3 U Methoxychlor 11 J 85 U 190 7.4 J 1.5 J Endrin ketone 3.3 U 17 U 0.67 J 1.9 J 3.3 U Endrin aldehyde 18 J 17 U 8.2 1.6 J 0.91 J alpha-Chlordane 0.48 J 22 5.9 0.29 J 0.12 J gamma-Chlordane 6.0 20 2.9 0.40 J 0.15 J Toxaphene 170 U 850 U 170 U 170 U 170 U Aroclor-1016 33 U 170 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1221 67 U 340 U 68 U 67 U 67 U Aroc lor- 1232 33 U 170 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1242 33 U 170 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1248 33 U 170 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroc I or -1254 33 U 170 U 33 U 33 U 33 U "Poclor-1260 240 J 170 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ •oc I or -1262 33 U 170 U 280 33 U 33 U I .roclor-1268 33 U 11000 100 33 U 33 U FILENAME: DAN566.SOG DATE: 05/25/95 PAGE: 2 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/

t I i

PESTICIDE/PCB SOIL ANALYSIS (•t CASE No: 0020N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT i SOG No: OAN566 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION A SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN581 DAN582 DAN583 DAN584 DAN585 £ t ..AMPLE LOCATION: RH-SO-BS04-03 RM-SD-BS06-03 RM-SD-BN05-03 RM-SD-BN07-03 RH-SD-BS07-03 £'. LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 704120 704121 704122 704123 704124 &Y SAMPLE TYPE: Field Sample Field Sample Field Sample Field Sample Field Sample MATRIX/ANALYSIS: SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / DILUTION FACTOR: 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 66 42 40 78 41 DATE SAMPLED: 04/18/95 04/18/95 04/18/95 04/18/95 04/18/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 04/24/95 04/24/95 04/24/95 04/24/95 04/24/95 DATE ANALYZED: 05/05/95 05/05/95 05/05/95 05/05/95 05/05/95

|alpha-BHC 8.4 U 0.06 J 0.14 J 1.7 U 0.17 J •beta-BHC 8.4 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U delta-BHC 8.4 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U gamma- BHC (Lindane) 8.4 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 0.74 J 1.7 U fl Heptachlor 8.4 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U f Atdrin 8.4 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 0.34 J 1.7 U fci Heptachlor epoxide 8.4 U 1.7 U 0.21 J 0.07 J 1.7 U Endosulfan I 8.4 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Dieldrin 1.7 J 3.3 U 0.65 J 3.3 U 3.3 U F*1 4,4'-DOE 1.4 J 0.48 J 2.6 J 1.8 J 1.3 J P* Endrin 2.2 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U K Endosulfan II 16 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 4,4'-DDO 5.5 J 3.3 U 3.5 3.4 3.3 U Endosulfan sulfate 16 U 3.3 U 1.4 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 4,4'-DDT 16 U 3.3 U 0.57 J 7.7 0.36 J F' Methoxychlor 84 U 17 U 17 U 17 U 17 U fc^ Endrin ketone 16 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 0.10 J d Endrin aldehyde 1.3 J 1.1 J 4.0 1.0 J 1.8 J alpha-Chlordane 0.95 J 0.34 J 0.51 J 0.10 J 0.99 J gamma-Chtordane 0.47 J 0.13 J 0.79 J 0.43 J 0.19 J BrJ Toxaphene 840 U 170 U 170 U 170 U 170 U E--I Aroclor-1016 160 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U t.!i Aroclor-1221 330 U 67 U 68 U 66 U 67 U Aroclor-1232 160 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1242 160 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U rt Aroclor-1248 160 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U • -oclor-1254 160 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U | Dclor-1261600 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 37 J I .-oclor-1262 160 U 20 J 50 32 J 33 U J Aroclor-12681 160 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U | FILENAME: DAN566.SDG DATE: 05/25/95 PAGE: 3 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg.

I

I I

PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANALYSIS LASE No: 0020N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT SOG No: DAN566 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION EPA SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN586 DAN587 DAN589 OAN59Z SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SO-BS05-03 RM-SO-BS03-03 RM-SD-ES05-03 RM-SD-CP03-03 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 704125 704126 704127 704128 SAMPLE TYPE: Field Sample Field Sample Field Sample Field Sample MATRIX/ANALYSIS: SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / DILUTION FACTOR: 5.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 I PERCEN T MOISTURE: 39 20 64 47 DATE SAMPLED: 04/18/95 04/18/95 04/18/95 04/18/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 04/24/95 04/24/95 04/24/95 05/03/95 I DAT E ANALYZED: 05/17/95 05/05/95 05/05/95 05/10/95 alpha-BHC 8.5 U 8.5 U 0.12 J 1.7 UJ beta-BHC 51 6.3 J 1.7 U 1.7 UJ delta-BHC 8.5 U 8.5 U 1.7 U 1.7 UJ gamma-BHC (Lindane) 8.5 U 8.7 1.7 U 1.7 UJ Ei Heptachlor 8.5 U 8.5 U 1.7 U 0.15 J Aldrin 8.5 U 2.4 J 1.1 J 0.33 J Heptachlor epoxide 8.5 U 8.5 U 0.32 J 0.17 J Endosulfan I 8.5 U 8.5 U 1.7 U 1.7 UJ Dieldrin 17 U 16 U 3.3 U 3.3 UJ 4,4'-DDE 17 U 16 U 2.3 J 2.1 J Endrin 17 U 16 U 3.3 U 3.3 UJ Endosulfan II 17 U 16 U 3.3 U 3.3 UJ 4,4'-ODD 17 U 5.1 J 3.3 U 1.8 J Endosulfan sulfate 17 U 16 U 2.2 J 3.3 UJ 4.4'-DOT 17 U 16 U 2.4 J 0.45 J Methoxychlor 85 U 85 U 6.9 J 17 UJ Endrin ketone 17 U 0.50 J 0.51 J 0.94 J Endrin aldehyde 19 11 J 3.3 U 0.34 J alpha-Chlordane 70 22 3.2 0.68 J gamma-Chlordane 37 16 1.9 0.25 J Toxaphene 850 U 850 U 170 U 170 UJ Aroclor-1016 170 U 160 U 33 U 33 UJ Aroclor-1221 340 U 340 U 67 U 67 UJ Voclor-1232 170 U 160 U 33 U 33 UJ •oclor-1242 170 U 160 U 33 U 33 UJ I .roc I or- 1248 170 U 160 U ' 33 U 33 UJ Aroclor-1254 5700 160 U 33 U 33 UJ Aroclor-1260 170 UJ 160 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ Aroclor-1262 170 U 2200 33 U 33 UJ I Aroclor-1268 170 U 160 U 33 U 33 UJ FILENAME: DAN566.SDG DATE: 05/25/95 PAGE: 4 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg.

I I I

Ms. Christine Clark June 23, 1995 Page Four

RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE CASE No. 0020N, SDG DAN558 e TABLE 1 - QUALIFICATION SUMMARY i Sample # Pesticide/ PCBs c DANS58 A DANS 60 A

DANS6 2 A

DANS6 3 A

DANS9 4 A

DANS9 5 A

DANS9 6 A i DANS9 7 A DANS9 8 A i DANS9 9 A DAN600 A P DAN601 A DAN602 A

DAN603 A L DAN607 A DAN608 A

DAN609 A I DAN610 A DAN613 A1

DANS 14 A1 Ms. Christine Clark June 23, 1995 j Page Five i ™ A - Accept the data. ™ A1 - Accept data but, estimate positive and non-detected results for 4,4'-DDE; 4,4'-DDD; 4,4'-DDT; alpha chlordane; endosulfan sulfate; and endrin aldehyde due to low field duplicate I precision.

I I

t.:

I

I PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANALYSIS CASE No: 0020N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT SOG No: OANS58 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION A SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN558 DAN560 DAN562 DAN563 DAN594 SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SD-HB20-03 RM-SD-SD19-03 RM-SO-SD20-03 RM-SO-OB03-03 RM-SO-OB04-03 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 705079 705080 705081 705082 705086 SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Saople Routine Saople MATRIX/ANALYSIS: SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 48 23 30 60 82 DATE SAMPLED: 04/19/95 04/19/95 04/19/95 04/19/95 04/19/95 e DAT E EXTRACTED: 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/24/95 DATE ANALYZED: 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/09/95 05/16/95 05/09/95

alpha-BHC 0.19 J 0.20 J 0.23 J 8.5 U 2.5 U beta-BHC 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U 8.5 U 2.5 U delta-BHC 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U 8.5 U 2.5 U ganma-BHC (Lindane) 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U 8.5 U 2.5 U Heptachlor 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U 8.5 U 2.5 U Aldrin 0.28 J 0.90 J .4 J 8.5 U 0.97 J Heptachlor epoxide 1.7 U 0.50 J .7 U 8.5 U 1.0 J Endosulfan I 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U 8.5 U 2.5 U Oieldrin 3.3 U 3.3 U .0 J 16 U 4.8 U 4. 4' -ODE 4.3 7.1 9.2 1.8 J 7.0 Endrin 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 16 U 4.8 U Endosulfan II 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 16 U 4.8 U 4,4' -ODD 13 3.3 U 21 16 U 38 Endosulfan sulfate 3.3 U 3.0 J 3.6 16 U 4.8 U 4, 4' -DDT 1.4 J 3.3 U 14 16 U 7.4 Methoxychlor 17 U 17 U 17 U 85 U 25 U Endrin ketone 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 16 U 0.33 J Endrin aldehyde 3.9 1.3 J 3.2 J 16 U 11 alpha-Ch lordane 1.1 J 0.96 J 3.5 17 1.6 J garnna-Chlordane 1.5 J 1.5 J 1.7 J 17 1.3 J Toxaphene 170 U 170 U 170 U 850 U 250 U Aroclor-1016 33 U 33 U 33 U 160 U 48 U Aroclor-1221 66 U 67 U 67 U 340 U 98 U »roclor-1232 33 U 33 U 33 U 160 U 48 U dor- 1242 33 U 33 U 33 U 160 U 48 U el or- 1248 33 U 33 U 33 U 160 U 48 U nroclor-1254 33 U 70 33 U 160 U 48 U Aroclor-1260 73 33 U 33 U 160 U 48 U Aroclor-1262 33 U 41 71 1800 180 Aroclor-1268 33 U 33 U 33 U 1600 48 U FILENAME: DAN558.SOG DATE: 05/25/95 PAGE: 1 y Water units are reported in ug/L. ij?J Soil units are reported in ug/Kg. i

PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANALYSIS CASE No: 0020N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT "OG No: DANS58 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

A SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN600 DAN601 DAN602 DAN603 DAN607 SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SD-DB06-03 RM-SO-DB10-03 RM-SO-OB10-03 RM-SD-OB07-03 RM-SO-HB17-03 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 705092 705093 705094 705095 705096 SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample Field Dupl. (4) Field Dupl. (D4) Routine Sample Routine Sample MATRIX/ANALYSIS: SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 23 60 59 34 80 DATE SAMPLED: 04/19/95 04/19/95 04/19/95 04/19/95 04/20/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/26/95 DATE ANALYZED: 05/09/95 05/06/95 05/06/95 05/06/95 05/18/95

alpha-BHC 2.2 U 0.26 J 0.14 J 0.14 J 9.4 U beta-BHC 2.2 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 9.4 U delta-BHC 2.2 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 9.4 U ganm-BHC (Lindane) 2.2 U .7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 9.4 U Heptachlor 2.2 U .7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 9.4 U Aldrin 0.05 J .7 U 1.7 U 0.47 J 0.25 J Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 J .7 U 1.7 U 0.24 J 9.4 U Endosulfan I 2.2 U .7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 9.4 U Dieldrin 0.65 J 7.2 3.3 U 8.7 1.9 J 4, 4' -DDE 4.3 U 6.7 9.4 1.7 J 0.99 J Endrin 4.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 18 U Endosulfan II 4.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 18 U 4.4' -ODD 4.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 18 U Endosulfan sulfate 4.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 18 U 4,4'-DOT 0.35 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 18 U Methoxychlor 22 U 17 U 17 U 17 U 94 U Endrin ketone 4.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 18 U Endrin aldehyde 0.39 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 18 U alpha-Chlordane 0.05 J 0.47 J 0.56 J 0.84 J 1.2 J gamma-Chlordane 2.2 U 0.59 J 0.67 J 1.3 J 0.48 J Toxaphene 220 U 170 U 170 U 170 U 940 U Aroclor-1016 43 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 180 U Aroclor-1221 87 U 68 U 67 U 68 U 370 U •-oclor-1232 43 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 180 U •cI or- 1242 43 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 180 U jclor-1248 43 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 180 U Aroclor-1254 43 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 180 U Aroclor-1260 43 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 180 U Aroclor-1262 43 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 180 U Aroclor-1268 33 J 780 700 780 290 FILENAME: DAN558.SDG DATE: 05/25/95 PAGE: 3 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg. f

PESTICIDE/PCB SOIL ANALYSIS Mo: 0020N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT No: DAN558 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

EPA SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN608 DAN609 DAN610 DAN613 DAN614 SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SD-HB16-03 RM-SO-HB19-03 RM-SD-HB18-03 RM-SO-SP04-03 RM-SO-SP04-03 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 705097 705098 705099 705100 705101 ra SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample Field Dupl. (06) Field Dupl. (D6) MATRIX/ANALYSIS: SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / SOIL / DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 70 70 80 75 79 DATE SAMPLED: 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 04/20/95 .DATE EXTRACTED: 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/26/95 04/26/95 DATE ANALYZED: 05/08/95 05/08/95 05/08/95 05/20/95 05/08/95

-~ alpha-BHC 1.7 U 8.4 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.5 U 1 beta-BHC 1.7 U 8.4 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.5 U 4delta-BHC 1.7 U 8.4 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.5 U ' gamma- 8HC (Lindane) 1.7 U 0.54 J 1.7 U 0.72 J 1.5 U Heptachlor 1.7 U 8.4 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.5 U - Aldrin 0.68 J 1.5 J 0.23 J 2.0 J 1.6 Heptachlor epoxide 1.7 U 8.4 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.5 U ' : Endosulfan I 1.7 U 8.4 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 1.5 U '" Dftldrin 10 16 U 2.2 J 16 U 2.8 U 4, 4' -DDE 4.2 29 1.9 J 16 UJ 20 J ~, Endrin 3.3 U 16 U 3.4 U 11 J 2.8 U ' Endosulfan II 3.3 U 16 U 3.4 U 16 U 2.8 U >i4,4'-ODO 3.3 U 16 U 3.4 U 16 UJ 26 J ^Endosulfan sulfate 3.3 U 16 U 3.4 U 16 UJ 3.4 J 4,4'-DDT 3.3 U 16 U 3.4 U 16 UJ 10 J ,-Nethoxychlor 17 U 84 U 17 U 85 U 2.8 J Endrin ketone 3.3 U 16 U 3.4 U 16 U 0.83 J '< -\ Endrin aldehyde 3.3 U 16 U 3.4 U 19 J 11 J ' alpha-Chlordane 2.6 8.6 1.2 J 8.5 UJ 1.6 J gaoma-Chlordane 1.0 J 9.4 1.2 J 4.7 J 3.1 _ Toxaphene 170 U 840 U 170 U 850 U 150 U • • -lor-1016 33 U 160 U 34 U 160 U 28 U • or-1221 66 U 330 U 69 U 340 U 58 U •. .lor-1232 33 U 160 U 34 U 160 U 28 • U Aroclor-1242 33 U 160 U 34 U 160 U 28 U _Aroclor-1248 33 U 160 U 34 U 160 U 28 U •Aroclor-1254 33 U 160 U 34 U 160 U 28 U •Aroclor-1260 33 U 160 U 34 U 160 U 28 U "Aroclor-1262 33 U 160 U 34 U 160 U 28 U Aroclor-1268 230 110 J 61 160 U 28 U FILENAME: OANSSS.SOG DATE: 05/25/95 PAGE: 4 ''"Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg. i

Ms. Christine Clark October 23, 1995 Page Six RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE Case No. 0022N SDG DAN690

TABLE 1 - QUALIFICATION SUMMARY I Sample f Pest/PCBs DAN690 A4 r DAN692 A2 -4-6 DAN693 A2.4.5.6

OAN694 A1 -4-6

DAN695 A4­ 5

DAN696 A4.5.6

DAN702 A4­ 6 4 DAN705 A'-

DAN707 A4-5'6

DAN709 A4

DAN711 A2'4­ 6

DAN712 A4

DAN713 A2.4.5.6

DAN714 A2 -4

DAN715 A4'6

DAN716 A1 -4-6

DAN719 A3'4

DAN720 A3 -4 I

Ms. Christine Clark October 23, 1995 Page Seven A1 - Accept data but, change positive result for methoxychlor to a revised detection limit due to blank contamination. i A2 - Accept data but, change positive result for endosulfan sulfate to a revised detection limit due to blank contamination. I A3 - Accept data but, estimate positive and non-detected results for delta-BHC, alpha chlordane and endrin aldehyde due to poor field duplicate precision. fi A4 - Accept data but, estimate non-detected results for aroclor­ 1260 due to poor PE results. Results are biased low. A5 - Accept data but, change positive result for endrin aldehyde to a revised detection limit due to PE sample contamination. A6 - Accept data but, change positive result for alpha-chlordane to a revised detection limit due to PE sample contamination. I I

I PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANASLYSIS CASE No: 0022N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT SDG No: DAN690 LABORATORY: COHPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION >A SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN690 DAN692 DAN693 OAN694 DAN695 . JkMPLE LOCATION: RM-SO-RF06-04 RM-SD-HB11-04 RM-SO-HB24-04 RM-SD-HB09-04 RM-SD-HB8A-04 - 1 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER : 746486 746487 746490 746491 746492 SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample MATRIX/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 54 67 57 50 75 DATE SAMPLED: 08/09/95 08/09/95 08/09/95 08/09/95 08/09/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 DATE ANALYZED: 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/24/95 08/24/95 08/31/95

1 alpha-BHC 3.7 U 5.1 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 0.38 J beta-BHC 3.7 U 5.1 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 0.24 J • delta-BHC 5.3 7.0 1.7 U 0.60 j 1.7 U gamM-BHC (Lindane) 0.55 J 2.2 J 0.19 J 0.34 J 1.7 U Heptachlor 3.7 U 5.1 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U \M' Atdrin 0.53 J 0.23 J 0.62 J 0.08 J 0.05 J L,( Neptachlor epoxide 3.7 U 5.1 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 0.03 J Endosulfan I 3.7 U 5.1 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Dieldrfn 0.24 j 1.7 J 3.3 U 0.10 J 0.16 J pq 4,4' -DOE 1.8 J 4.7 J 1.2 J 3.3 U 3.3 U rS- Endrin 7.2 U 10 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U jJra Endosutfan II 7.2 U 10 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 4,4<- ODD 9.0 16 3.3 U 0.65 J 0.34 J Endosulfan sulfate 7.2 U 10 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 4,4'-DOT 0.44 J 2.7 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 0.12 J *% Methoxychlor 37 U 51 U 17 U 17 U 17 U jrtj Endrin ketone 0.31 J 10 U 0.15 J 3.3 U 0.16 J :&: Endrin aldehyde 7.2 U 10 U 18 U 3.3 U 3.3 U alpha-Chlordane 3.7 U 5.1 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U gamma-Chlordane 1.2 J 3.6 J 0.39 J 0.11 J 0.65 J P55 Toxaphene 370 U 510 U 170 U 170 U 170 U Kj Aroclor-1016 72 U 100 U 33 U 33 U 33 U fel ArocI or- 1221 150 U 200 U 68 U 67 U 67 U Aroc I or- 1232 72 U 100 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1242 72 U 100 U 33 U 33 U 33 U • Aroc tor -1248 72 U 100 U 33 U 33 U 33 U V -oclor-1254 72 U 100 U 33 U 33 U 33 U | >clor-1260 72 UJ 100 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ | oclor-1262 99 250 33 U 33 U 33 U | Aroc I or- 1268 72 U 100 U 130 33 U 33 U 1 FILENAME: OAN690.SOG DATE: 09/28/95 PAGE: 1 Water units are reported in ug/L Soil units are reported in ug/Kg

m y i i I

Ms. Christine Clark September 29, 1995 Page Five RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE Cas« NO. 0022N SDG DAN652 E TABLE 1 - QUALIFICATION SUMMARY 1 Sample # Pest/PCBs

DAN652 A2.7,10 • ! DANS 60 A44.7,10 r DAN661 A5- 7'10 * DAN665 A7- 10 E DANS6 6 A7 DANS6 8 A1.3.7,10 [; DANS 70 A7 - 10 DANS 71 A7- 10

I 7 DANS7 3 A I DANS74 A7 DAN679 A6'7 i DAN680 A7 DANS 81 A7- 10 F...-' r 7 10 DANS8 2 A '

| DAN683 A7.9.1 0

DAN685 A7.8.10

. DAN687 A3,7,8,9,10

DANS8 8 A2,3.7.9

DAN689 A3 .7,8,9, 10 E

Ms. Christine Clark September 29, 1995 Page Six A1 - Accept data but, change positive result for endosulfan II to a revised detection limit due to blank contamination. i A2 - Accept data but, change positive result for methoxychlor to a revised detection limit due to blank contamination. A3 - Accept data but, change positive result for gamma chlordane I to a revised detection limit due to blank contamination. A4 - Accept data but, change positive result for heptachlor to a revised detection limit due to blank contamination. A5 - Accept data but, estimate positive and non-detected results for alpha chlordane and aroclor-1262 due to poor field duplicate precision. A6 - Accept data but, estimate positive result for heptachlor epoxide due to poor field duplicate precision. A7 - Accept data but, estimate non-detected results for aroclor-1248 due to poor performance evaluation sample results. A8 - Accept data but, change positive result for endosulfan sulfate to a revised detection limit due to PE sample contamination. I A9 - Accept data but, change positive result for endrin ketone to a revised detection limit due to PE sample contamination. A10 -Accept data but, change positive result for endrin aldehyde to a revised detection limit due to PE sample r contamination. I

PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANASLYSIS 1 CASE No: 0022M SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT ->G No: DAN652 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION t , ^A SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN652 OAN660 DAN661 DAN668 DAN670 1 SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SO-RF01-04 RM-SD-S019-OA RM-SD-SD19-04 RM-SD-HB06-04 RM-SD-SD10-04 [ LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 745770 745980 745981 745984 745985 SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample FIELD DUP (2) FIELD DUP (2) Routine Sample Routine Sample MATRIX/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ E DILUTIO N FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I PERCEN T MOISTURE: 52 66 69 26 70 DATE SAMPLED: 08/07/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 •DATE EXTRACTED: 08/11/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 DATE ANALYZED: 08/30/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95

1 alpha-BH C 6.1 U 1.7 U 0.36 J 0.06 J 2.7 beta-BHC 1.8 U 0.71 J 1.7 U 0.26 J 0.45 J r" delta-BHC 1.8 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U f gamne-BHC (Lindane) 2.2 0.26 J 0.15 J 0.13 J 0.50 J [ Heptachlor 0.28 J 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Aldrin 2.6 1.3 J 0.68 J 0.10 J 1.7 J Heptachlor epoxide 1.9 1.7 U 0.18 J 0.27 J 0.96 J Endosulfan I 1.8 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Dietdrin 3.6 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 0.43 J 1.5 J 4,4'-ODE 3.6 U 2.6 J 1.1 J 3.5 2.5 J Endrin 2.7 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U Endosulfan II 3.6 U 3.3 U 1.9 J 3.3 U 3.3 U r\ 4, 4 '-000 5.8 2.8 J 2.0 J 2.3 J 8.1 Endosulfan sulfate 3.6 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U [ 4, 4' -DDT 4.4 1.1 J 0.31 J 6.4 3.3 U Methoxychlor 3.6 U 17 U 17 U 17 U 17 U Endrin ketone 3.6 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U I Endrin aldehyde 4.3 U 8.9 U 6.1 U 3.3 U 20 U alpha-Chlordane 1.8 U 3.5 J 0.22 J 1.7 U 6.7 L ganma-Chlordan e 6.3 3.2 2.2 1.7 U 7.6 1 Toxaphene 180 U 170 U 170 U 170 U 170 U Aroclor-1016 36 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U J Aroclor-1221 72 U 66 U 66 U 67 U 68 U oclor-1232 36 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U • K: I or- 1242 36 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U H• .oclor-1248 36 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ Aroclor-1254 36 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U J Aroclor-1260 36 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U •Aroclor-1262 36 U 180 J 33 UJ 33 U 450 V i Aroclor-1268 36 U 130 110 18 J 300 1FILENAME: DAN652.SOG DATE: 09/25/95 PAGE: 1 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg.

I E

PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANALYSIS CASE No: 0022M SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT SDG No: DAN652 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

'A SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN671 DAN673 DAN674 DAN665 DAN666 AMPLE LOCATION: RM-SD-HB12-04 RM-SD-S020-04 RM-SO-S013-04 RM-SD-HB23-04 RM-SD-S007-04 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 745986 745987 745988 745982 745983 SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sanple Routine Sample Routine Sample MATRIX/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ DILUTION FACTOR: 5.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 57 35 69 81 45 DATE SAMPLED: 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 DATE ANALYZED: 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95

alpha-BHC 0.68 J 2.0 3.7 J 0.41 J 1.5 J beta-BHC 8.5 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 9.0 U 3.8 delta-BHC 8.5 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 9.0 U 1.7 U ganM-BHC (Lindane) 0.28 J 0.62 J 8.5 U 9.0 U 0.44 J Heptachlor 8.5 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 9.0 U 1.7 U Aldrin 8.5 U 1.6 J 2.8 J 0.37 J 2.1 Heptachlor epoxide 1.0 J 2.0 7.6 J 0.29 J 1.7 U Endosulfan I 8.5 U 1.7 U 8.5 U 9.0 U 18 Dieldrin 17 U 4.2 16 J 0.67 J 3.1 J 4, 4' -DDE 3.6 J 4.5 8.1 J 1.1 J 0.26 J Endrin 8.2 J 3.3 U 16 U 17 U 3.3 U Endosulfan II 4.7 J 3.3 U 16 U 17 U 3.3 U 4,4' -ODD 6.8 J 16 28 8.3 J 6.4 Endosulfan sulfate 17 U 3.3 U 16 U 17 U 3.3 U 4.4'-DOT 3.2 J 3.3 U 16 U 16 J 3.3 U Methoxychlor 85 U 17 U 85 U 90 U 17 U Endrin ketone 17 U 3.3 U 16 U 17 U 3.3 U Endrin aldehyde 17 U 59 130 18 U 27 alpha-Chlordane 2.9 J 1.1 J 32 0.41 J 7.4 gamna-Chlordane 0.50 J 8.4 30 1.8 J 6.5 Toxaphene 850 U 170 U 850 U 900 U 170 U I Aroclor-101 6 170 U 33 U 160 U 170 U 33 U Aroelor-1221 340 U 67 U 330 U 350 U 67 U Aroelor-1232 170 U 33 U 160 U 170 U 33 U '-oc I or- 1242 170 U 33 U 160 U 170 U 33 U >clor-1248 170 UJ 33 UJ 160 UJ 170 UJ 33 UJ oclor-1254 170 U 33 U 160 U 170 U 33 U Aroclor-1260 170 U 33 U 160 U 170 U 33 U Aroclor-1262 170 U 33 U 160 U 3600 640 Aroclor-1268 77 J 890 5300 2500 480 FILENAME: DAN652.SDG DATE: 09/25/95 PAGE: 2 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg.

I 1 PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANALYSIS CASE No: 0022N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT ">G No: DAN652 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION /A SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN679 DAN630 DAN681 DAN682 DAN683 SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SO-SD21-04 RM-SD-S021-04 RM-SD-HB01-04 RM-SO-HB02-04 RM-SD-HB10-04 LABORATORY SAMPLE MUMBER: 746454 746473 746474 746477 746481 SAMPLE TYPE: FIELD DUP (4) FIELD DUP (4) Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample MATRIX/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 49 48 66 72 71 DATE SAMPLED: 08/09/95 08/09/95 08/09/95 08/09/95 08/09/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 DATE ANALYZED: 08/26/95 08/26/95 08/26/95 08/26/95 08/26/95

alpha-BHC 0.05 J .7 U 1.7 U 0.73 J 0.19 J b»ta-BHC 1.7 U .7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U d*lta-BHC 1.7 U .7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U ganM-BHC (Lindane) 0.24 J .50 J 0.65 J 4.5 .7 U Heptachlor 1.7 U .7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U Aldrin 1.0 J .7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U Heptachlor epoxide 7.0 J 0.77 J 1.7 U 0.21 J .7 U J Endosulfa n I 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U .7 U Dieldrin 3.3 U 3.3 U 6.5 5.8 0.47 J 4,4'-DOE 3.3 U 3.3 U 2.3 J 2.7 J 6.6 Endrin 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.2 U Endosulfan II 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.2 U 4,4' -ODD 3.3 U 3.3 U 17 20 3.2 U Endosulfan sulfate 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.2 U [,' 4,4'-DDT 3.3 U 3.3 U 0.85 J 2.6 J 1.4 J Methoxychlor 17 U 17 U 17 U 17 U 17 U Endrin ketone 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.2 U 7.1 U 7.2 U 13 U rar Endrin aldehyde 3.3 U 3.3 U alpha-Chlordane 1.7 U 1.7 U 6.6 5.8 4.0 gamna- Ch I ordane 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 0.42 J 0.53 J Toxaphene 170 U 170 U 170 U 170 U 170 U Aroclor-1016 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 32 U Aroclor-1221 67 U 67 U 66 U 67 U 66 U oclor-1232 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 32 U * I or- 1242 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 32 U oc I or- 1248 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 33 UJ 32 UJ Aroclor-1254 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 32 U Aroclor-1260 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 32 U Aroclor-1262 5400 5400 33 U 33 U 32 U Aroclor-1268 33 U 33 U 120 120 240 FILENAME: DAN652.SOG DATE: 09/25/95 PAGE: 3 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg. r L i I

Ms. Christine Clark October 21, 1995 Page Six I RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. SITE Case No. 0022N SD6 DAN727 i TABLE 1 ­ QUALIFICATION SUMMARY I Sample # Pest/PCBs DAN727 A5

DAN730 A4- 5

DAN731 A4- 5

DAN733 A5'6

DAN734 A5- 6

DAN736 A2,3,5

DAN740 A1'5

DAN742 A1- 5

I 1 5 DAN744 A ' I DAN746 A1'5 DAN748 A5

DAN749 A5

DAN754 A3

DAN755 A5 D DAN757 A5 DAN758 A1- 5 Ms. Christine Clark October 21, 1995 Page Seven A1 - Accept data but, change positive result for heptachlor epoxide to a revised detection limit due to blank contamination. i A2 - Accept data but, estimate positive result for aroclor 1262 and reject non-detected results for heptachlor, endrin and 4,4'-DDT due to poor matrix spike precision. I A3 - Accept data but, estimate positive results for 4,4'DDE and endrin aldehyde due to %RSD > 50% between the spiked and r unspiked sample. A4 - Accept data but, estimate positive and non-detected results for 4,4'DDD, alpha chlordane, aroclor 1262 and aroclor o 1268 due to poor field duplicate precision. A5 - Accept data but, change positive result for alpha BHC to a revised detection limit due to PE sample contamination. A6 - Accept data but, estimate positive and non-detected results for aldrin, endosulfan I, 4,4'-DDE, 4,4'-ODD and gamma- i chlordane due to poor field duplicate precision. i Ei

I r I PESTICIOE/PCB SOIL ANALYSIS CASE No: 0022N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT SOG No: DAN727 LABORATORY: COMPIOEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION EPA SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN736 DAN 740 DAN 746 OAN748 OAN749 'AMPLE LOCATION: RM-SD-S024-04 RM-SD-SD33-04 RM-SD-SD32-04 RM-SD-SD31-04 RH-SO-S038-04 MORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 747587 748727 748730 748731 748732 SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample MATRIX/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ DILUTION FACTOR: 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 71 52 70 67 33 DATE SAMPLED: 08/15/95 08/15/95 08/15/95 08/15/95 08/15/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 08/22/95 08/22/95 08/22/95 08/22/95 08/22/95 i DAT E ANALYZED: 08/30/95 09/01/95 09/01/95 09/01/95 09/01/95

alpha-BHC 17 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U beta-BHC 2.0 J 1.7 U 0.18 J 1.7 U 1.7 U I delta-BHC 17 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U gamma- BHC (Lindane) 2.3 J 1.4 J 0.37 J 1.7 U 0.15 J Heptachlor R 1.7 U 0.07 J 1.7 U 1.7 U Aldrin 5.2 J 0.42 J 0.35 J 0.08 J 0.26 J Heptachlor epoxide 1.7 J 1.7 U 1.7 U 0.88 J 0.63 J Endosulfan I 17 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Oitldrfn 2.4 J 7.9 0.24 J 1.8 J 2.1 J 4,4' -DOE 37 2.8 J 1.8 J 6.5 7.9 Endrin R 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U Endosulfan II 33 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 4,4' -ODD 80 12 1.5 J 7.1 32 Endosulfan sulfate 33 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 4. 4' -DDT R 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U Methoxychlor 170 U 17 U 17 U 17 U 17 U Endrin ketone 33 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U Endrin aldehyde 140 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U alpha-Chlordane 41 14 3.2 10 2.6 gamma-CMordane 33 7.1 1.8 10 3.4 Toxaphene 1700 U 170 U 170 U 170 U 170 U Aroclor-1016 330 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroelor-1221 680 U 67 U 67 U 67 U 67 U Aroc lor- 1232 330 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1242 330 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroc I or -1248 330 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U -oclor-1254 330 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U I •oclor-126 0 330 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroc lor- 1262 10000 J 2100 95 380 250 Aroc I or- 1268 8200 2100 120 450 310 I FILENAME : DAN727.SDG DATE: 10/05/95 PAGE: 2 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg. F: I

I I

PESTICIDE/PCB SOIL ANALYSIS CASE No: 0022N SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT SOG No: DAN727 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION .PA SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN754 DAN 75 5 DAN757 DAN/58 DAN742 SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SO-S036-04 RM-SO-S037-04 RH-SD-GM07-04 RH-SD-GM08-04 RM-SO-SD35-04 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 748733 748734 748735 748736 748728 SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample Routine Sample MATRIX/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ SOIL/ DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 46 43 62 64 55 DATE SAMPLED: 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/15/95 1 DAT E EXTRACTED: 08/22/95 08/22/95 08/22/95 08/22/95 08/22/95 DATE ANALYZED: 09/01/95 09/01/95 09/01/95 09/01/95 09/07/95

I alpha-BHC 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U beta-BHC 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U detta-BHC 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U ganm-BHC (Lindane) 1.7 U 0.30 J 0.08 J 0.03 J 1.7 U Heptachlor 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Aldrin 0.82 J 0.56 J 0.14 J 0.19 J 0.31 J r 1.7 U Heptachlor epoxide 1.7 U 0.30 J t.7 U 1.7 U Endosulfan I 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U 1.7 U Dieldrin 3.3 U 3.2 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 0.11 J 4, 4' -DDE 1.6 J 5.9 0.15 J 0.54 J 2.0 J Endrin 3.3 U 7.9 3.3 U 0.26 J 3.3 U Endosulfan II 3.3 U 4.6 0.31 J 3.3 U 3.3 U 4, 4' -ODD 2.8 J 8.9 0.28 J 1.5 J 3.2 J Endosulfan sulfate 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 4, 4' -DOT 3.3 U 2.5 J 3.3 U 0.22 J 3.3 U Methoxychlor 17 U 26 17 U 17 U 17 U r. Endrin ketone 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U 3.3 U Endrin aldehyde 3.3 U 3.4 3.3 U 0.2 J 3.3 U alpha-Chlordane 3.1 4.2 0.05 J 0.15 J 3.8 gamma-Chlordane 3.3 3.2 1.7 U 0.15 J 3.5 Toxaphene 170 U 170 U 170 U 170 U 170 U Aroclor-1016 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1221 67 U 67 U 67 U 67 U 68 U Aroclor-1232 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U -oclor-1242 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U •oclor-1248 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1254 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1260 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U Aroclor-1262 130 33 U 33 U 33 U 170 Aroc tor- 1268 33 U 33 U 33 U 33 U 140 FILENAME: DAN727.SDG DATE: 10/05/95 PAGE: 3 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg.

I I

PESTICIDE/PCS SOIL ANALYSIS >SE No: 0022M SITE: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. STRATFORD, CT G No: DAN/27 LABORATORY: COMPUCHEM ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION EPA SAMPLE NUMBER: DAN744 _ SAMPLE LOCATION: RM-SD-S034-04 LABORATORY SAMPLE NUMBER: 748729 SAMPLE TYPE: Routine Sample MATRIX/ANALYSIS: SOIL/ DILUTION FACTOR: 1.0 PERCENT MOISTURE: 50 DATE SAMPLED: 08/15/95 DATE EXTRACTED: 08/22/95 DATE ANALYZED: 09/07/95

alpha-BHC 1.7 U ' beta-BHC 1.7 U delta-BHC 1.7 U E ganna-BHC (Lindane) 0.06 J Heptachlor 1.7 U Aldrin 0.06 J Heptachlor epoxide 1.7 U Endosulfan I 1.7 U Dieldrin 3.3 U r 4 , 4' -ODE 2.4 J Endrin 3.3 U Endosulfan II 3.3 U 4,4' -ODD 3.8 Endosulfan sulfate 3.3 U 4, 4' -DOT 3.3 U Nethoxychlor 17 U p'i Endrin ketone 3.3 U I • Endrin aldehyde 3.3 U [ ; alpha-Chlordane 4.0 1 gamma- Ch I ordane 3.6 Toxaphene 170 U aJ Aroclor-1016 33 U • oclor-1221 67 U • >c I or- 1232 33 U H ,..oclor-1242 33 U Aroclor-1248 33 U U Aroclor-1254 33 U • Aroclor-1260 33 U • Aroclor-1262 150 T Aroclor-1268 160 BI FILENAME: DAN727.SOG DATE: 09/28/95 PAGE: 4 Water units are reported in ug/L. Soil units are reported in ug/Kg.

I I I

I I r

Attachment 2 Data Sets - CDEP-1 through CDEP-9 (Lower Housatonlc River Sediment Sampling Information Provided by the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection • August 6, 1996)

I BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC. engineers ft t c I o n t I t t s

I

I I

I

G | Data SetCDEP -1

I BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC. eng/neari ft scientists

L E

VIA. FACSIMILE;JS;.RSGtf?3kR' I 3TO Januar. y r- Mr. _Gedrge:Worker r­ .State ~&£- Conwacticut •^Department of_ Bax^ "offica~of Lei 7'9 Sim. 'Sfreet-: _____ C­ Hartford, GT-- 0«106 " RBt AEPLICATEEiaj- COP-94.-097-GW, -Dear ~ r promia«i, ftacloaed pleas«--iind-tsating required wsde-r-t.he above II ^O'a *ftpwe--ar*y questions concorning- any I your

r tr_xi-_•;.:::• 7:':.:.. •-== the Board-6* tJiriscrfcora— r" R7 Kor-i- - — ­

I f

3333 Main • Stratford, Connecticut 06497 • -203) 37r-6o-i­ f MILFORD MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 655 Plains fid. • Mllford, Connecticut 08400 Phone (203) 877-3163 Fax (203) 870-6162 Flexline (Ct) 1-800-352-1389

Mall to no. Box 493 January S4, Mllfwcl, Conn, 00460 1 T*tt Mfc£135 of 4

I TOi Brtakwatar K»y Anociation 3333 Main St. Stratford, CT 86497 mOMi DOfcinic Mattrone ATT? Mr. Niehola* t. Owtni REr Exa« of four bottoi ttdittnt core tanpltfc taktn fro* K»y Proptrty, Stratford, CT, R»c'd. i/10/9S, D»Uv»r»d by Otto Thrall, Codfjpoti & nctociatvk. Th« taiple w*» ttft»d in accordance with the requir»itnt« of the Aray Corps I, of Engineers NE Division for tfredgtd aatvriaL Iwo conpotit* oanpUfc A 4 B and C I D.

1 I*kU Ifi MBtalt Ai>alv»ii af pritd Bolidt I TEST RESULTB 6P1KK |^'IHI. J< RECOVERY CoBDOf|ttf B § £> i: f P

ftritnic 6.36 ppn £. IS ppB - — Cadii UK .60 .50 96.0 | Chroiiui 71.8 ae.t n.o Copptr 180,9 1S6.9 95.0 L»ad 46,8 57. ?! 94.9 Nickel 61.6 28.4 95.0 Htrcury [t_. 1.94 ,r»a Zinc 76.0 84,0 9V. 0 L 1

1 *«.. * «k Vijf^v^..M «vCs

P«Bt £ of

lEtt BEflMUfi fit Received f-CB's N»< 18 BDB N0{ ND< 10 EiMt.1 Aldrin ND( tt DDI, ND < £8 ND<

»• DDT, DDE, |ftD ND<

Di.IdNh ND<

It II

ND< f.ftdrin N0<

Endrin ftld*hyd. ND{

ND( ft-BHC ND( B-BHC ND{ W-BHC ND( , Q'BHC N0( i

H-thoxychlor N0( ^

ToK.phen. w< g

H»pt«chlor EpoxidB January 24, 1996 Tefcl M62133 P«p» A of 4 i TflBLE Racultft Are in ppft. BPIKE HATIUX I CpiPoiiti CiD i. NIH & ND<

2.

3. flnthi»«c«n<»

4. BcnzeU)

5, 3,4-B*n*ofluoranthrn*

C. Dtnio(t) Pyrinn* il 7. Bftito (Qhi) PtryUne I S, B»nz o (k) 9, Biphenyl 90.0 I 10. Dlbtnx o U,h) 11. Fluortri* Jndtno (1,5,3-cd) Pyr»n»

13.

it, l~Mithyln*phth*Un» "

1C!, 2~M»OiylTi«pth«l»ne "

16, Peryl«n» " i

January 24, Mf>ai33 3 of 4

IflBU IB r QRG^ica I HtlbQfl BPIKE MATRIX n TEST gflEC&yfiBY

6ft* HUihad MM COBDOtitB A^B CAD Bvnzo (a) Anthrareno ND( £« ppB PpB 9&.0 Bftnzo (a) Pyrene ND< £0 "

Chry*tnt ND< £0 " Fluoranthen* & ND< £0 " N0< £0 " 90.0 r Pyrrnt ND< 80 " i ft* Rtocived

TOC 1.4SX 90,0 Watfr fiMlH Silt flW^yqiB

Q4B

.6 0 10 Z.3 .1 40 30.0 £3,3 ! 34.0 41. fe 32. f) 3£.a f

e i r c

I Data SetCDEP - 2 I BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC. « n a I n » « r t A lolontltts

I I N I I PROJE LIMITS PHASE 1 BEGINS

I I UTILITY AREA: NO MOORING NO DREDGING (SEE FIGURE ) FEDERAL CHANNEL LIMITS

OVERNIGHT MOORING (MIN. DEPTH -9 MJ_W.)

PROPOSED DREDGE LOCATIONS PHASE 2 I BEGINS HOUSATONIC RIVER. CONN. DREDGE AND MOORING AREAS DATE: MARCH 1993

SOURCE: NAUTICAL CHART 12370 FIGURE MayuiiT Croup Inc. Architects/ En gineen/ Planners One Court Street 4a MATCH MARK SEE FIGURE 4b New Britain. Connecticut 06051 APPLICANT: DAN BEARD, INC i

y

PHASE 3

BEGINS FEDERAL CHANNEL LIMITS

OVERNIGHT MOORING DEPTH -9 MJ..W.) $ PROPOSED DREDGE LOCATIONS

HOUSATONIC RIVER, CONN. I DREDGE AND MOORING AREAS

SOURCE. NAUTICAL'CHART 12370 Majutrc Croup Inc. Architects/ Engineers/ Planners

APPLICANT: DAN BEARD, INC a

i i

'— FEDERAL CHANNEL ~ LIMITS HOUSATONIC RIVER. CONN. i DREDGE AND MOORING I OVERNIGHT MOORING AREAS (MIN. DEPTH -9 M.LW.) i SCALE. V» 1,090' DATE: MARCH 1993 N.O.A.A. FIGURE PROPOSED DREDGE SOUPCE: NAUTICAL CHART 12370 Maguirt Croup Inc LOCATIONS Architects/ Engineers/ Planner. One Court Strew 4c .\ew Britain. Connecticut 06051 APPLICANT: DAN BEARD, INC Page 2

Date Sanroles Received : 4-26-94

Client Name: TPA Design Group CTL Lab No. 44-498-7 Report Date: 5-11-94 PO/Job No. N/A e « RESULTS OF ANALYSIS i Total Metals EPA 3050A r*^ Matrix Type S S S ly CTZi Sample No. 4583 4584 4585 Field ID TPA-1 TPA-2 TPA-3 HDL Arsenic-nig/kg 0.5 BDL • BDL BDL Cadmium-nig/kg 0.1 BDL 0/8 BDL Chromium, Total-mgAg 0.5 31.1 41.6 6.4 Copper-iag/kg 0.5 "79.7 157 2'0.9 " Lead-mg/kg 0.5 "11.0 '"• 14.9 3.7 Nlckel-mg/Kg 0.5 9.5 """12.4 ~ 3.5 Merc ury- mg/fcg 0.02 0.09 0.06 BDL Zinc-mg/icg 96.6 129 21.1 I 0.5 Matrix Type S S S CTL Sample No. 4583 4584 4585 Field ID TPA-1 TPA-2 TPA-3 I HDL TOC-% 0.1 3.13 0.68 0.20 % water 0.01 20.27 25.93 23.12 % Bulk Asbestos 1.0 " flDL SDL BDL

MDL= Minimum Detectable Levei/BDL= Befow Detection Level

Matrix Types : W » Water/Aqueous S - Soil/Solid O = Oil/Hydrocarbons

CONNECTICUT TESTING LABORATORIES. INC. 165 Gracey Avfenue / Meriden, CT 06451-2268 | (203)-634-3731 Connectictit Certification No. PH-0547 I Pages

Date Samples Received : 4-26-94

Client Name: TPA Design Group CTL Lab No. 44-498-7 Report Date: 5-11-94 ; PO/Job No. N/A I RESULTS OF ANALYSIS I Total Metals EPA 3050A Matrix Type S S S P CTL Sample Ho. 4586 4587 4538 Field ID TPA-4 TPA-5 TPA-6 i MDL r . ' f Arsenic-mg/Jcg 0.5 BDL BDL BDL Cadmium-rag/Jcg 0.1 BDL BDL BDL Chromium/ Total -mg/kg 0.5 28.3 6.3 12.1 c- 46.6 Copper-mg/Jcg . 0.5 86.9 30.9 Lead-mg/lcg 0.5 8.9 8.1 6.2 NicKel-mg/Jcg 0.5 ' 6.3 16.2 5.9 Merctiry-mg/Kg 0.02 0.04 BDL BDL Zinc-mg/Jcg 0.5 5*7.2 65.3 39.8 i Matrix Type S S S CTL Sample Ho. ' 4586 4587 4588 Field ID TPA-4 TPA-5 TPA-6 i MDL TOC-% 0.1 0.76 2.38 0.67 % Water = . o.oi 20.71 Si. 89 19.00 \ JBUIK Asbestos 1.0 BDL BDL BDL

MDL= Minimum Detectable Level/BDL= Below Detection Level

Matrix Types W = Water/Aqueous S - Soil/Solid O = Oil/Hydrocarbons

I

CONNECTICUT TESTING LABORATORIES. INC. 165 Gracey Avenue / Meriden, CT 06451-2268 j (203)-634-3731 Connecticibt Certification No. PH-0547 Page 4

Date Samples Received : 4-26-94

Client Name: TFA Design Gr >up CTL Lab No . 44-498-7 Report Date: 5-11-94 PO/Job No. N/A E I RESULTS OF ANALYSIS Total Metals EPA 3050A

Matrix Type S C CTL Sample No. 4589 Field 10 TPA-7 MDL' Arsenic-mg/kg : 0.5 BDL Cadiaium-mg/kg 0.1 BDL cnromium, Total-ihg/Jcg 0.5 Copper-rag/fcg 0.5 —zl:? — Lead-rag/ Kg 0.5 3.7 NicJcei-mg/icg • 0.5 Tl.7 Mercury-ing/Kg 0.02 SDL zinc-mg/jcg 0.5 41.0

x Type S ample No. 4589 ID TPA-7 ' MDL TOC-% ; o.i 0.53 % Wat er : 0.01 19.65 %'Bul Jc Asbestos : 1.0 BDL i MDL= Minimum Detectable Level/BDL= Below Detection Level

Matrix Types : W Water/Agjueous S Soil/Soljid O Oil/Hydrocarbons

CONNECTICUT TESTING LABORATORIES. INC. 165 Gracey Avenue / Meriden, CT 06451-2268 ! (203)-634-3731 Connecticirt Certification No. PH-0547 I Pages

Date Samples Received : 4-26-94

Client Name: TPA Design Group CTL Lab No. 44-498-7 Report Date: 5-11-94 PO/Job No. N/A

I EPA METHOD 608/8080 Date Samples Rec'd : 4-26-94 Matrix Type : 3 3 8 8 c CTL SAMPLE # : 4S83 4584 4585 4586 Field ID TPA-1 TPA-2 TPA-3 TPA-4 HDL Aldrin 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL a - BHC 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL b - BHC 0.02 BDL BDL : BDL BDL"" d - BHC 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Lindane 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL cnxordane 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL~~ 4,4' - ODD 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL 4,4' - DDE 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL 4,4' - DDT 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Dieidrin 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL I Endosulfa n I 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Enaosuitan u 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL jenaosuiran suirate 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Enorin .001 BDL BDL BDL BDL I Enarin Aldehyde 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL [email protected] 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Heptacnior fipoxide 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Metnoxyctiior 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Toxapftene 0.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL PCS - 1016 0.01 BDL BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1221 0.01 BDL BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1232 0.01 BDL BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1242 0.01 BDL BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1248 0.01 BDL BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1254 0.01 BDL BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1260 0.01 BDL BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1268 0.01 BDL BDL BDL BDL

MDL= Minimum Detectable level/BDL= Below Detection LeveJ/UNITS = PPM Matrix Type :W= Water/Aqueous S= Soil/Solid 0= Oil/Hydrocarbons

CONNECTICUT TESTING LABORATORIES. INC. 165 Gracey Avenue / Meriden, CT 06451-2268 j (203)-634-3731 Connecticut Certification No. PH-0547 I Page6

Date Samples Received : 4-26-94

Client Name: TPA Design Group CTL Lab No. 44-458-7 Report Date: 5-11-94 PO/Job No. N/A

EPA METHOD 608/8080 Date Samples Bec'd : 4-26-94 Matrix Type : S 8 6 CTL SAMPLE # : 4587 4588 4589 Field ID : TPA-5 TPA-6 TPA-7 MDL Aldrin 0.02 BDL BDL BDL a - BHC 0.02 BDL BDL" BDL b - BHC 0.02 BDL BDL ~ BDL d - BHC 0.02 BDL BDL ' BDL" Lindane 0.02 BDL BDL " BDL cniordarie 0.02 BDL "BDL ' BDL 4,4' - ODD 0.02 BDL BDL BDL 4,4* - DDE 0.02 " BDL" BDL BDL 4,4' - DDT 0.02 BDL BDL BDL Dieiorin 0.02 BDL BDL' BDL Endosuifan I 0.02 BDL •" BDL BDL Bnaosuiran n 0.02 BDL BDL BDL Endosuiran Sulfate 0.02 BDL BDL BDL Endrin .001 BDL BDL BDL Endrin Aldehyde .0.02 BDL BDL " BDL neptacnior 0.02 BDL ~BDL " " BDL Hep-cacnior Epoxiae 0.02 BDL BDL" BDL Methoxych1 or 0.02 BDL BDL BDL Toxapnene 0.02 BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1016 0.01 BDL ""BDL BDL PCS - 1221 0.01 BDL BDL ' " "BDL~ PCB - 1232 0.01 BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1242 0.01 BDL "BDL ' BDL PCB - 1248 0.01 BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1254 0.01 BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1260 0.01 BDL BDL BDL PCB - 1268 0.01 BDL BDL" BDL

MDL= Minimum Detectable Level/BDL= Below Detection Levei/UNITS= PPM I Matrix Type ; W= Water/Aqueous S= Sofl/Sdid O= Oil/Hydrocarbons

CONNECTICUT TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. 165 Gracey>venue / Meriden, CT 06451-2268 j (203)-634-3731 Connecticut Certification No. PH-0547 r 1 " *^ f~n:uj l LoNNc. — i i Lu * i co i i NG "-1 175 \ \ Page 7 j Client : TPA Design Group Date Extracted : 4-28-94 Lab No. : 44-498-7 Date Analyzed : 5-5-94 PO No. : N/A Analyst : YK e Rep. Date : 5-11-94 i EPA METHOD 8100 Modified GC/MS Date Samples Rec'd : 4-26-94 Matrix Type : i s s s s CXL SAMPLE # : • : 4583 4584 4585 4586 r Field ID I I TPA-1 TPA-2 TPA-3 TPA-4

Benzo Ca) anthracene Ol02 0.05 0.03 BDL BDL Benzo (a) pyrene Ol02 0.05 0.06 BDL BDL Cbrysene 0^02 0.06 0.04 BDL ' BDL Pluorantnene 0102 0.08 0.05 BDL ' ' BDL Pnenanthrene 0!.02 ~ BDL ~ BDL~ BDL BDL Pyrene Qi.02 ~ 0 . ir~ 0.10~~ BDL 'BDL " Acenaphthene Qi.02 BDL BDL ~ ' ' BDL' BDL Acenaphthylene 0^02 BDL BDL TBDL BDL Anthracene 0;.02 O.OT" BDL BDL BDL Bipftenyi 0>02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo (o) f luoranthene 0'.02 0.06^ 0.03 BDL BDL i Benzo( k) f luoranthene Oj.02 0.13 ' 0.03' BDL " "BDL " Benzo (e)pyrene •01.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Benzo (gni)peryiene Oi.02 0.02" BDL BDL BDL Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene OL02 BDL BDL BDL BDL i 2, 6-Dimethylnaphthalen e 0".02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Fluorene 0|.02 BDL BDL BDL BDL Indeno (1,2, 3-cd) pyrene 0|.02 O.OT( ~ BDL BDL BDL 1-Methylphenanthrene 01.02 BD] L BDL ~ BDL ~~ BDL 1-Methylnaphthalene Oi.02 BD1 L BDL BDL BDL 2-Methyinaphthalene 0|.02 ' BDI L "' BDL ' BDL BDL Naptxtnaiene Oj.02 BD3 L BDL BDL BDL Peryiene 01.02 BDI L BDL BDL BDL

MDL= Minimum Detectable Level/BDL= Below Detection Lfivel/UNITS= PPM

Matrix Type : W« Water/Aqueous S= Sofl/Soiid O= Oil/Hydrocarbons

CONNECTICUT TESTING LABORATORIES, INC. 165 Gracey AVenue/ Meriden, CT 06451-2268 I (203)-634-3731 Connecticut Certification No. PH-0547 nAY-11-1554 Ib' l-i CONNECTICUT TE5TING iu 17S77116 P.06

Paged

Client TPA Design Group Date Extracted : 4-28-94 Lab No. 44-498-7 Date Analyzed : 5-5-94 PO Ho. N/A Analyst : YK Rep. Date 5-11-94 ;

EPA METHOD 810Q Modified GC/KlS Date Samples Rec'd : 4-26-94 Matrix Type i 5 S S CXL SAMPLE # : 4587 4588 4589 Field ID : TPA-5 TPA-6 TPA-7 MDL I Benzo( a) anthracene Oi.02 BDL BDL BDL Benzo ( a) pyrene CK02 BDL BDL" BDL" Chrysene 0:.02 BDL "BDL" BDL" Fluoranthene 0|.02 BDL BDL" BDL" Phenanthrene 01.02 BDL "BDL" BDL" Pyrene OL02 BDL "BDL" BDL" Acenapnthene 0;.02 BDL ~BDL~ BDL" Acenapbtnylene Oi.02 BDL "BDL" BDL" Antnracene 0^.02 BDL "BDL" BDL" Bipnenyl 0;.02 BDL" "BDL BDL" Benzo( b) fluorantnene Oi.02 BDL ""BDL BDL" Benzo ( k) f luoranthene Oi.02 BDL" "BDL" BDL" Benzo (e)pyrene Oi.02 BDL" ~BDL~ BDL" Benzo( gnx )perylene Oi.02 BDL "BDL" BDL" Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 0:.02 BDL "BDL" BDL 2, 6-Dimethylnaphthalene 0|.02 BDL" "BDL" BDLl Pluorene Oj.02 BDL "BDL BDL indeno( 1 , 2 , 3 -cd ) pyren01.0e 2 BDL "BDL" BDL 1-Methylphenanthrene • 0;.02 BDL" "BDL_ ~~BDL~ l-Methylnaphthalene 0'.02 BDL~ "BDL ~~BDL 2-MetnylaaphthaJ.ene Oi.02 BDL "BDL_ Naphthalene 01.02 BDL "BDL BDL Peryiene Oj.02 BDL "BDL BDL

MDL= Minimum Detectable Levei/BDL= Below Detection Level/UNITS= PPM

Matrix Type : W= Water/Aqueous S= Soii/Sdid O= Oil/Hydrocarbons

CONNECTICUT TESTING LABORATORIES. INC. 165 Gracey Avenue / Meriden. CT 06451-2268 (203)-634-3731 Connecticut Certification No. PH-0547 I Paged

Client : TPA Design Group Date Extracted : 4-28-94 Lab No. : 44-498-7 ' Date Analyzed : 5-5-94 PO No. : N/A Analyst : YK Rep. Date : 5-11-94

I Quality Control Data k ­ «c Method I QC TV Results Blank Arsenic-mg/L 0.200 0.188 ND<0.05 Cadmiun-mg/L 0.20 0>.19 ND<0.01 r Chromium/ Totai-mg/L 1.00 0.96 ~ND<0.05~ Copper-jag/L 0.50" " ' 0.45 ~ND<0.01" Lead-rag/L 1.00"" 0.97 ND<0.05 NicKel-mg/L 0.80 0 •- 75"" "ND<0.05 Mercury-nig/L 0.200 0.207 ~lro 0.444 0.32? ~ND<1 4,4'-DDD-ppb 0.626 0.584 ND<1 4/4'-DDE-ppb 0.495 '0.478 ND<1 Dieldrin-ppb 0.553 0.426 ND<1 Heptachlor-ppb 0.514 0.479 ND<1 t- Heptachlor Epoxide-ppb 0.375 0.305 ND<1 Benzo ( a) anthracene-ppb 0.010 0.012 ND<2 Benzo ( a ) pyrene-ppb 0.010 0.012 ND<2 Cnrysene-ppb 0.010 0.012 ND<2 r Fluoroantnene-ppb 0.010 """ 0.012 ND<2 Phenantlirene-ppb 0.010 • 0.011 ND<2 ­ Pyrane-ppb 0.010 0.012 ND<2 i Acenaphthene-ppb i 0.010 0.011 -ND<2 Ac enapnt hy1 ene-ppb 0.010 0.011 ND<2 Anthracene-ppb 0.010 0.012 ND<2 Benzo (b ) f luoranthene-ppb 0.010 0.012 ND<2 Benzo ( k ) f luoranthene-ppb "' 0.010 0.016 ^ND<2 Benzo ( ghi )perylene-ppb " 0.010 0.012 ND<10 Dibenzo ( a,h ) anthracene-ppJD i 0.010 0.012 "ND<10 Pluorene-ppb I 0.010 0.012 ND<2 Indeno ( 1 ,2,3 -cd ) pyrene-ppto ! 0.010 0.012 ~ND<15 Naphthalene-ppb ; o.oio 0.011 ND<2

L MDL= Minimum Detectable'Level/BDL= Below Detection Leve«/UNITS= PPM L Matrix Type :W= Water/Aqueous S= Soil/Solid 0= Oil/Hydrocarbons I e CONNECTICUT TESTING LABORATORIES. INC

I E

DataSet CDEP - 3

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC. » n g I n 9 o r t A t c I e n t I s t i y APPLICATION FORl&CERTIFICATE OErPERMISSlON \ -^=3=»_=-- ­ RETURN COMPLETED FORM AND "^> " ' FEE MJirtSiBE ATTACHED TO THIS FORM. ATTACHMENTS IN TRIPLICATE TO -t x'' «>• • " VV* v' " - -'V° ' ""'"^'Fetfor.MuwclpaUlicj) : Ur.f IIU.M FOR DEP-USE ONLY

l»-»TM*)Suui.H«nfei<: ^° REFER TO INSTRUCTIONS WHILE COMPLETING THIS FORM 1 i, NAME OF APPLICANT: Attn% R.n. Chevalier >< PHONE (Res.): Connecticut Lieht and Power Comnanv i ADDRESS: «, PHONE (Bw.): I P.O. Box 270, Hartford,CT 06141-0270 (203) 6^5-5000 Attn. R.G. Chevalier 4, PHONE: Northeast Utilities Service -^ADDRESS: TOT-Bose-WO-r-HartfOTd-iCTTOe 14 1-0270 » ADDRESS OR LOCATION OF PIlOl-OSEU WORK (ineliklc «tr«cl iddresi and eiiv,1o»n): CL&P Devon Station, Naupatuck Avenue

Milford, CT v SAME OF W ATERBODV AT SITE OF PROPOSED WORK: Housatonic Fiver u. DESCRIPTION OK PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY (S 1.1" X II' plant mutt be Included): Maintenance dredge approximately 500 cubic yards of silt by use of hydraulic pupping

operation, which will incorporate three, 40 yard industrial dumpsters placed in series I sealed and baffled. Materials collected in the dumpsters will he reiroveH daily and stored in a landfill located on the Devon Station site. n, PCRTOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: I Maintenance dredpe to remove an accumulation of silt from the *ront o* the intake structure. The intrinsic nature of the intake to plant operation makes it imperative dredp i:, DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING STRl'CTVRES. CONDITIONS. AND ISES AFFECTED BY PROPOSED WORK (plant and current phoios must be included): The proposed 1993 maintenance dredge will be performed in an area in front of the intake

structure that has been continously maintained since the inception of the plant. The

proposed dredging will have no effects on the day to dav use of the Pousatonic piver or

areas associated xvith it. i>. IDENTIFY COASTAL RESOURCES ON SITE AND IN ADJACENT AREA: L Developed shorefront. estuarine enbaynent, coastal flood hazard area. I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT S ASSOCLVTD) W1T11 PROPOSED W ORK AND MITIGATION ME\StRES TO BE EMPLOYED: There will be no adverse environmental impacts associated with the proposed maintenance

I dredpe. The proposed 1993 maintenance dredge is heinp performed on a previously

permitted structure. ro

SHEETING RETAINING WALL

I

NOTE: ELEVATIONS SHOW* ARE ARE BASED UPON NGVD (USL) y PROPOSED MTAKE DREDGING PURPOSE: UAIN1ENANCE DREDGING AT SCREENHOUSE DEVON 9ENERATMG STATION HOUSATONIC RIVER (1400'± NORTH OF LONG BLAND SOUND) MLFORD. CONNECTICUT APPLICATION BY NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE CO. AS AGENT FOR THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT * POWR CO. (IN FEET) I" - 2tf MARCH 1093

DWG. NO. 21639 V. S. 1526 I Revised Sheet 3

W/LL &£ located at the Devon Station site.

NOTE: ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ARE BASED UPON NCVD (USL)

PROPOSED tTTAKE DREDCMC PURPOSE- MAINTENANCE DREDGING AT SCREENHOUSE DEVON CCNERATMC STATION HOUSATOMC RIVER <1400'± NORTH OF LONG ISLAND SOUND) MLFORO. CONNECTICUT APPLICATION BY NORTHEAST UnLITCS SERVICE CO. AS AGENT FOR THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT * PO*ER CO.

MARCH 1093 E Revised Sheet

oP9 —J. oPIO f ** 140 RIVSR FLOW­

NOTE: ELEVATIONS SHOW ARE ARE BASED UPON NGVD (MSL)

PROPOSED INTAKE OKEDGXHG PURPOSE: MAINTENANCE DREDONG AT SCREENHOUSE DEVON OEMERATMC STATION HOUSATONIC RIVER (1400'± NORTH OF LONC ISLAND SOUND) MILFORO. CONNECTICUT APPLICATION BY NORTHEAST UTUJTIES SERVICE CO. AS AGENT FOR THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT * PO*€R CO.

MARCH 1903 I NORTHEAST III1IJI II:S tMt COHNCCTICUT ICMT UO ">«• WISTCKN HUSKHUSms ELCCTX COUMNT

NOHIMIASI UTILIHtS StUYlCt COM"»' ILL KMTHUST KuClU* CNCKT C

| PRODUCTION ANALYTICAL LABORATORY WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA

I MARCH 19, 1993

TO: LROSS

FROM: MADHUSHAH ^\JA^L >

RE: TOTAL ORGANIC CARBONS TEST DATE SAMPLED: 2-9-93

NO. SAMPLE I. D. % WATER TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON, PPM As Rec'd Dry basis basis m 1983-1984 P1 &P4 40.6 190 320 I 1985-1986 P3, P6. P7 42.9 331 579 1987-1988 P2&P5 1 46.9 286 506

I I NORTHEAST UTILITIES ^^f^^^^f^l TK CO~*Cnaj1 UOXt OMK COurwrv

MOLTOKC warm ^ow9 COM»M

PRODUCTION ANALYTICAL LABORATOR Y WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA

JANUARY 18, 1993

TO: LROSS FROM: MADHU SHAH RE: ANALYSES OF SAMPLES FROM DEVON DATE TAKEN: 12-8-92

(1074) (1077) Riverside Dockside Intake Intake I Sample No. (TCLP) (TCLP) I Composite of P8 - P12 Composite of PI - P7 Silver, ppm <0.05 <0.05 Cadmium, ppm <0.01 <0.01 Lead, ppm <0.10 <0.10 0 Arsenic, ppm <0.005 <0.005 Mercury, ppm <0.0005 < 0.0005 Selenium, ppm <0.005 < 0.005 Barium, ppm Chromium, ppm <0.05 <0.05

OS70 REV 8-80 BP91 — 22 — 93 MON 11=07 NU E n v I r o n m • n x. a. a to .62

Devon Station Sediment Analysis

COMPOSITE SAMPLE PI ft P4

e Sieve Size Percent Retained on Sieve Organic Content (%) Percent Water

4 12 9J% 55.4% i 10 1.8 IS 09 40 10.4 60 33.0 120 215 200 &2 <200 24.0

COMPOSITE SAMPLE P2 A P5

Sieve Size Percent Retained on Stove Organic Content (%) Percent Water

4 0.9 8,0% 57.5% 10 1.5 1$ 1.3 40 &7 I 60 24.5 120 18,4 200 5.7 <200 39.0

COMPOSIIE SAMPLE PS, P6 & P7

Sieve Size Percent Retained on Sieve Organic Content (%) Percent Water

4 0.7 73 56.3 10 L4 18 L2 40 &5 I 60 24.6 120 29.6 200 10.6 1 <200 23.4 I .-^''"''v ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY REPORT LAB. REPORT NO.

i... •'.'-''*-. SCIENCE r_lr)C.(.{5 »^J7 CORPORATION State Certification No. PH-0476 EPA Number CT013 ^^^^ 362 Industrial Park Rd. Middletown, CT 06457 (203) 632-0600, FAX (203) 632-7743 DATE RECEIVED )2/12/93 QCLIENT |~~ ~~| PURCHASE ORDER NO. )50766 Mr. Les Ross -,,-.,,,« ». j_w j. »T^ •i• j . CLIENT I.D. . Northeast Utilities JIEU P.O. Box 270 I1 Hartford, CT 06141-0270 CLIENT PROJECT NO. L _J TELEPHONE NO {i eS65-5657 DEVON STATION/SCREENHOUSE

SAMPLE ID: P1 i P4 P2 & PS P3, P6, P7 LOCATION: DEVON STATION DEVON STATION DEVON STATION TYPE: SLUDGE SLUDGE SLUDGE DATE: 02/09/93 02/09/93 02/09/93 ** TEST ** (ALL UNITS ARE mg/kg)

I ** METHOD 8270 Acenaphthene <1

ec: Ed Keith Method 8270 reflects a modified list of compounds as requested by client. Analyses done by dry weight basis. Total Solids: P1 i P4 s 285C P2 & P5 = 43%; P3,P6,P7 = 40X

02/25/93

DATE REPORTED LABORATORY DIRECTOR I ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY REPORT LAB. REPORT NO. SCIENCE C-14278 CORPORATION State Certification No. PH-0476 362 Industrial Park Rd. EPA Number CT013 Middletown, CT 06457 f (203) 632-0600, FAX (203) 632-7743 DATE RECEIVED 12/09/92

CCLIENT |~ "1 PURCHASE ORDER NO. 050766 Mr. L.E. Ross Northeast Utilities CLIENT I.D. NEU P.O. Box 270 1 Hartford, CT 06141-0270 CLIENT PROJECT NO. L J TELEPHONE NO. 665-5657 DEVON STATION

SAMPLE ID: INTAKE (.PI-P7J RIVERSIDE SO ( i" rJ ~~ If £ ­ LOCATION: DEVON STATION DEVON STATION TYPE: SLUDGE SLUDGE DATE: 12/08/92 12/08/92 ** TEST ** (ALL UNITS ARE mg/ks) DATE TIME DATE TIME m •* EPA METHOD 8080/608-PCB's y PCB-1016 <0.1 12/15/92 08:39 <0.1 12/21/92 16:08 PCS-1221 <0.1 12/15/92 08:39 <0.1 12/21/92 16:08 PCS-1232 <0.1 12/15/92 08:39 <0.1 12/21/92 16:08 PCS-1242 <0.1 12/15/92 08:39 <0.1 12/21/92 16:08 I PCS-1248 <0.1 12/15/92 08:39 <0.1 12/21/92 16:08 PCS-1254 <0.1 12/15/92 08:39 <0.1 12/21/92 16:08 I PCS-1260 <0.1 12/15/92 08:39 <0.1 12/21/92 16:08

I < - Below Hininun Detectable Level 1

cc: Ed Keith

01/15/93 - 1 ­

DATE REPORTED LABORATORY DIRECTOR I i I C r c,

Data Set CDEP - 4

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC. I engineers & scientists r L i i ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

ardston MA 01452 Analytical Data Report

HOUSATONIC RIVER

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers New England Division Environmental Laboratory Hubbardston, MA 01452 I I

Date: October 14, 1992 Brian J. Condike Chief, Environmental Laboratory I I i f r

LOCATION MAP

CS1 ISLAND

Seal* in Feet

2000 0 2000 4000

HOUSATONIC RIVER, CONN. PROJECT LOCATION

: AS NOTED DATE: MARCH 1993

SOURCE: U.S.A.C.O.E. FIGURE Magaire Croup Inc Architects/Engineers/ Planners 0"* Court Street 1 Bntam Connecticut 06051 APPLICANT: DAN BEARD, INC NELLS L

18' C'tiANN. TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Case Summary

2. Sample Listing

3. Laboratory Data

4. Quality Assurance Data

5. Chain of Custody

6. Cooler Receipt Form

7. Quality Assurance Review ;r__ «*>'S'tXS'*¥ •• - % **• Vty • i­ ~>/3 I

HOUSATONIC RIVER (6/10/92)

\ 1. Five sediment samples were received for the above project on 10 June 1992. The correct sample containers and sample preservation procedures were followed unless otherwise indicated on the cooler receipt form. Copies of the chain-of-custody records are enclosed for reference, along with a list of the samples collected.

2. The following analyses were performed in-house: Analysis EPA Method

Sediment samples

PCBs 3540/8080 Pesticides 3540/8080 Arsenic 3051/7060 Lead 3051/7421 Mercury 7471 ICAP Metals 3051/6010 (Cd, cr, Cu, Ni, Zn) Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons 8270 3. Our validated contractor laboratory performed the following analyses: Total Organic Carbon 9060 HOUSATONIC RIVER SAMPLE LISTING i ENV NO. FIELD DESCRIPTION SAMPLE DATE MATRIX **­ 17008 STATION NO. Q 5/21/92 SEDIMENT 17009 STATION NO. J 5/20/92 SEDIMENT I STATION NO. I 5/20/92 SEDIMENT 17010 17011 STATION NO. I-MS 5/20/92 SEDIMENT 17012 STATION NO. I-MSD 5/20/92 SEDIMENT U.S. ARMY CORK OF ENGINEERS • ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY S«ptWD«r 1, 1992 •I - TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON RESULTS •

Tnc Method D«uU Uniti Arutyted FUld Dtscripcion Totil Orjinic Carbon 9060 O.M X 08/07/92 e 1TA. NO a Total Organic Carbon 9060 0.60 X 08/07/92 i Total Organic Carbon 9060 0.40 X 08/07/92

o x 100 U.S. AHMT CORPS OF ENGINEERS • ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATOUlf

• PCS ( PtsTicioe ngsuirs - Sept* •r 1. 1992 Date Date Lib* Field Description rest Result Units Extracted Analyted

A- 17008 JTA. NO Q Total PCla >• 0.084 PP" 04/18/92 07/29/92 i Alpha-Sue .4 us/kg 04/18/92 08/20/92 r Sa«a»-8MC (Lindane) .4 U9/k9 04/18/92 08/20/92 leta-IHC .4 U9/k9 04/18/92 08/20/92 Heptaehtor .4 US/kg 04/18/92 08/20/92 Dalta-CHC .4 U9/k« 04/18/92 08/20/92 Aldrin .4 u9/kg 04/18/92 08/20/92 i" Heptechlor epoxide .4 U9/k« I 04/18/92 08/20/92 Endosulfan [ .4 u»/k9 04/18/92 08/20/92 4,4' -DM 13 . ug/k g 04/18/92 08/20/92 OUldrin 13 u«/k9 04/18/92 08/20/92 Endrln 13 U9/k9 04/18/92 08/20/92 4,4'-000 24 ,N ug/kg 04/18/92 08/20/92 Endeaulfan It 13 ^ uo/k9 04/18/92 08/20/92 : 4,4'-OOT 13 ug/kg 04/18/92 08/20/92 Endrin aldehyde 13 ug/k9 04/18/92 08/20/92 Endosulfan tulfate 13 ug/kg 04/18/92 08/20/92 r MethoxycMor 44 v^ U9/k 9 04/18/92 08/20/92

Surrogate Recoveries (\)

PC8» TOW (»5-HO) 70

Pesticides DSC 26 TOW 51 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS - ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ** - PCS t PESTICIDE RESULTS • August 31, 1992 m Oact Oati Lab* Fi*(d Description Tnt •nuU Unit] Extracted Analyzed

A- 17009 STA. MO. J Total PC81 0.19 PP> - 04/18/92 07/29/92 Alpha-IHC 5.0 "9/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 GaoM-IKC (Lfndan*) 5.0 u9/kg 04/18/92 07/31/92 leta-IHC .0 u«/k« 06/18/92 07/31/92 Htptachlor .0 U9/k) 06/18/92 07/31/92 •* Oalta-INC .0 us/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Aldrin .0 U9/k9 06/18/92 07/31/92 HepcaeMor epoxid* .0 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Endetulfan I .0 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 4,4'-OOE us/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Odtdrin . ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Endrin 9. ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 4,«'-000 9. u«/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Endetultm II 9. uj/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 4,*'-BOT 9. ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Endnn ild*hyd* 9.9 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Endo«u(f*n sulfact 9.9 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Htthaxychlor 50 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92

Surrogate Recoveries (V

PCBs TO« («-!

Pesticides DSC 52 TCMX 65

Reviewed gy: I^QA^K.kj)^^ . Analyst

".•?•! U S ARMY CORPS GF ENGINEERS • ENVIRCWtEirAL LA80«ATCJT­

- PCI t PESTICIDE RESULTS • August 31 1992

Oate 0«tt Lab* Field Description Te*c Rnult Units Analyttd

A- 17010 STA. NO. I Total PCI* .017 PP» 06/18/92 07/29/92 Alpfta-tHC .0 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 CMMO-IHC (llndane) .0 u«/k9 06/18/92 07/31/92 leta-BHC .0 ug/k9 06/18/92 07/31/92 XepcacMor .0 U9/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Oelta-IHC .0 U9/kS 06/18/92 07/31/92 Aldrin .0 06/18/92 07/31/92 Heptachlor epexide .0 ugykg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Enfesulfan 1 .0 U9/k9 06/18/92 07/31/92 4, 4' -ODE .9 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Oltldrin .9 u9/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Jndrln .9 06/18/92 07/31/92 4,4' *000 .9 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Endesulfan II .9 ug/k9 06/18/92 07/31/92 4,4' -DOT .9 u9/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Enirfn aldehyde .9 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 Endotulfin nil fate « .9 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92 MethoxycMor !0 ug/kg 06/18/92 07/31/92

Surrogate Recoveries (X)

PCBs TOW (*5-1W) 67

Pesticides DSC 61 TCMX 75 i U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NEW ENGLAND DIVISION, ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY PRODUCED ON 08/31/92 15:35 I HOUSATONIC RIVER PCBs (ppm)

L METHOD PARAMETER ILAJK

SEDIMENT

Total PCI< 0.0023

Surrogatt Rteovtry { X )

TOW (45-140)

SAMPLE DATE DATE RECEIVED. DATE EXTRACTED: 6/18/92 I OATE ANALYZED: 7/29/92 I

n PCS MATRIX SPIKE-MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE SEDIMENT I PRECISION

»••»*»•»»«•»»«»»-. MATH IX MAT1IX SPIKE IELATIVE MAXIMUM [M OR I COMPOUND SPIKE DUPLICATE PERCENT ACCEPTABLE OUT Of •ECOVm UCOVERr DEVIATION RPO OC Extraction Data: 6/11/92 (X) (X) (RPO) LIMITS

Total PCS* 90 80 12 U IN

[ c ACCURACY SPIKING MATRIX ACCEPTABLE IN OR COMPOUND SPIKE JtAMGE OUT OF RECOVERY OC (X) LIMITS I Total PCBl 90 61 • US IN I

I I I r4 c en a n O

COMf

CRAB a m m ? \­ >o \ IP 5 z

•xl

>

en

f i, I

Data Set CDEP - 5

BLA5LAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC. o n g I n 9 a r s ft scientists I 5/15/89 TABLE I A. Chemical constituents, EPA analytical methods and detection limits routinely used for chemical examination of proposed dredged material. Analytical Detection Chemical Constituent Method Limit fppm)

METALS Arsenic 7060, 7061 0, ,5 Cadmium 7130, 7131 0. ,1 Chromium 7190, 7191 1, 0 Copper 7210 1. 0 Lead L 7420, 7421 1, 0 Nickel 7520 1. 0 Mercury 7471 0.02 Zinc 7950 1.0

ORGANICS ' PCBs(total) 8080 0.01 Pesticides 8080 0.02a Aldrin Chlordane pp-DDT, DDE, ODD Dieldrin Endosulfan I, II Endosulfan sulfate Endrin Endrin aldehyde Heptachlor Heptachlor expoxide atBtS,and f Hexachlorocyclohexane Methoxychlor Toxaphene PAHs 8100, 8250, 8270 0.02a Benzo(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Chrysene Fluoranthene Phenanthrene Pyrene TOG 9060 %Water 1.0 Grain Size Wet Seive # 4,10,40,200

Includes all compounds listed, units in %

11 5/15/89 Table I B: Additional chemical constituents", EPA analytical methods and detection limits used for the chemical examination of proposed dredged material.

Analytical Chemical Constituent Method Detection Limit E f ppmi 2 METALS Antimony 7040, 7041 1.0 I Beryllium 7090, 7091 0.1 Selenium 7740, 7741 0.1 Silver 7760 0.1 r Thallium 7840 0.1

MISCELLANEOUS Cyanide 9010, 9012 2.0 Phenolics 9065, 9066 1.0 Isophorone 8090 0.02 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) 8280 0.002 2,3,7,8-TCDF (Furan) 8280 0.002

Aromatic Hydrocarbons 8100, 8250, 8270b 0.02C Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Biphenyl Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(e)pyrene Benzo(ghi)perylene Oibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2-6-Dimethylnaphthalene Fluorene Indeno (1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1-Methylphenanthrene 1-Methylnaphthalene 2-Methy1naphthalene Naphthalene Perylene Chlorinated Hydrocarbons 0.02C 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8010, 8020, 8250,8270 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8010, 8020, 8250,8270 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8010, 8020,8250,827 0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8010, 8120, 8250,8270 2-Chloronaphtha1ene 8120, 8250, 8270 Hexachlorobenzene 8120, 8250,827 0 Hexachloroethane 8120, 8250, 8270 0.04 Hexachlorobutadiene 8120, 8250, 8270 0.04 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8120, 8250, 8270

12

I MILFORD MATERIALS TESTING LABORATOR E 655 Plains Rd. • Milford, Connecticut 06460 (203) 877-3163 •BST3 To: Pootatuck Yacht Club nyi 11 iv, IJJL. man TO r.i 100 Housatonic Ave. Test M53263 Milford.c B Stratford, CT. Page 1 of 4 • From: Burt M. St. Clair * Re: Exam of bottom sediment samples Rec'd 3/25/92 [ Marked: Composite A- Sample 5,6,7, 8 te Composite B- Sample 1,2,3, 4 The samples were tested in accordance with the requirements of The Army Corps of Eng. 1? N.E. Division for dredged materials tob e disposed of in open waters and also DEP « • Requirements. m Table 1A ^ Metals Analysis of Dried Solids [f Test Result tv ""* Composite A Composite B • Vsenic 1.92 ppm <-­ 1.80 ppm i­ -admium 3.0 ^ 1.4 L. Chromium 116. H 86.0 L ( Copper 476. H ­ 362. " „ Lead 121.n 72.0 ­ 1 Nickel 80.0 M 66.0 * Mercury 2.40 tf -» 1.60 H* p Zinc 286 M 216 r

G Burt M. St. Clair 1

pi I april 10, 1992 Test M53263 Page 2 of 4

Table 1A- Organics Method 8080 Result As Rec'd Composite A Composite B IfcB's NDL 10 ppb NDL 10 ppb Pesticides f tdrin NDL 20 ppb NDL 20 ppb M Chlordane n r>-DDT,DDE,DDD l/ieldrin rndosulfan 1,11 r Lidosulfan Sulfate Endrin j^jidrin Aldehyde I Heptachlo r BHC tBHC /jjtethoxychlor Ibxaphene Heptachlor Epoxide Method 8100 !*nzo (a) Anthracene NDL 100 ppb NDL 100 ppb ' -A ijizo (a) Pyrene 530 410 :hrysene NDL 100 uoranthene rij 'henanthrene Irene I I MIIFORD MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 655 Plains Rd. • Milford, Connecticut 06460 (203) 877-3163

April 10, 1992 Test M53263 Mail to P.O. Box 493 m____-__-iTable 1A _ Page 3 of 4 Milford, Conn. 06460

«As Rec'd Composite A Composite B •TOC 1.67% 1.37% Water 70.70% 52.86%

F Grain Size Analysis Composite A Composite B ["Sieve No. % Retained U 0 0 HO .20 .30 ho 11.0 4.7 200 35.7 62.2 f 200 53.0 32.6 EP Requirements Composite f Composite A Composite B Pil 4 Grease .063% .039% ^Jol Solids 3.10 2.11 Coarse Aggregate |,' Sand 53.0 67.0 Clay + Silt 47.0 33.0

Burt M. St. Clair I 1 I MILFORD MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 655 Plains Rd. • Milford, Connecticut 06460 (203) 877-3163

April 10, 1992 Test M53263 Mail to P.O. Box 493 i Page 4 of 4 Milford, Conn. 06460 I _Aromatic_Hydrocarbons_ Table 1B Results in ppb.

Composite A Composite B

1. Acenaphthene NDL 50 NDL 50 2. Acenaphthylene NDL 50 NDL 50 3. Anthracene 880 910 4. Bephenyl NDL 50 NDL 50 5. Benzo(b) fluoranthene 1,600 1,400 6. Benzo (k)fluoranthene 1,000 850 I 7. Benzo (a) Pyrene 530 410 8. Benzo (ghi)perylene NDL 100 NDL 100 I 9. Dibenzo(a,h.-) anthracene NDL 100 NDL 100 10. 2,6-Dimethylnaphthalene NDL 50 NDL 50 11. Fluorene NDL 50 NDL 50 12. Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NDL 100 NDL 100 f 13. 1-Methylphenanthrene 200 95 14. 2-Methylphenanthrene 250 115 15. Napthalene NDL 50 NDL 50 16. Perylene NDL 100 NDL 100

I I I

I r

i <

Data Set CDEP - 6

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC. I o n g I n o o r s A i c I o n t I s t j r c L I i 1 I OCEAN AND COASTAL

ot/CONSULTANTS. INCt. July 22, 1987

VIA PUROLATOR COURIER State of Connecticut E Department of Environmental Protection State Office Building !7FPr \/r~ ( 165 Capitol Avenue l\L O *_ ! -. _ Hartford, CT 06106 n[; Attention: Mr. Frederick Huntley ^-iii! ^ 9 t'"'" fe' Permits Section V-TF-? nr<- ~ V . • *• i b_ » v I *_ *—• rf' w* * » w• Reference: Harbor Woods Marina Ui!iT § Stratford, Connecticut Proposed Maintenance Dredging P Application No. SD-H-86-302 '' Dear Mr. Huntley: Ocean and Coastal Consultants, acting as agents for Cutter Operating Corporation, submits herein Permit Drawings for the referenced Application. We have also enclosed a copy of the letter authorizing us as agents I and a copy of dredge spoil testing results. It is our understanding, per your telephone conver­ sation with Stan White on July 21, 1987, that upon I receipt of these drawings, the public notice will be issued. If you have any questions concerning the above or the attached, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours,

OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.

Richard J. Newhouse RJN:dje Senior Enginee'r 732-01 I Enclosures: Permit Drawings (4 sheets) Copy of 6/3/87 letter from Cutter Operating Copy of 4/24/87 Report from Environmental i Laboratories, Inc. cc: Ralph A. Naylor (Cutter Operating Corporation)

2225 Reservoir Avenue. Trumbull. CT 06611 (203) 372-9006 FAX 372-3583 pra || Cutter Operating Corp. pj,: • A Culler Reaky Group Company ( 300 Broad Street - Stamford,CT 06901 •203 •324 -0152

June 3,1987

To Whom It May Concern: This letter shall serve to advise you that Stanley M. White, P.E., Ocean and Coastal Consultants, Inc., is authorized to act as our agent in order to secure a maintenance dredging permit for Harbour Woods Condominiums, Stratford, Connecticut. Sincerely, CUTTER OPERATING CORPORATION Agent for Harbour WoodsLtd.

RANtjeh REPORT OF TESTS FOR Cutter Operating Corp. 300 Broad Street Stamford, CT 06901 Attn: Mr. Randy Naylor

ELI Project No.: 87-567-10 ELI Certification No.: PH-0450

Report Date: 4/24/87

Report Prepared By:

Elaine A. Carino Laboratory Director

.ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

2.0 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 1

3.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSES 2-3

APPENDIX A - ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

APPENDIX B - CHAIN OF CUSTODY

.ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES INC _. 1.0 INTRODUCTION

The results we obtained on your samples are presented immediately after this introduction.

All analyses were performed in accordance with EPA approved

procedures. ELI maintains strict quality controls and

quality assurance plans which meet or exceed EPA Protocols.

2.0 SAHPLE IDENTIFICATION

The submitted sample collected by ELI on April 20, 1987 is

identified as the following:

ELI Sample No.; Your Sample No.;

87-0418 Harbor Woods Housatonic River Sediment

.ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INC.. 3.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSES

ELI SAMPLE NO.: 0418 Volatile Solids 9.9 Water 54.4 Oil & Grease 1.0 Mercury 1.9 ppm Lead 52. ppm Zinc 195. ppm Arsenic 1.9 ppm Cadmium 2.5 ppm Chromium 284. ppm Copper 505. ppm Nickel 26. ppm Total PCB's

All results expressed in dry weight

.ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INC. 3.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSES (Cont'd) Grain Size Analysis Sample No. Sieve No. % Finer 0418 10 89.43 40 61.15 100 47.32 200 35.10

.ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES INC _ E i I

b I APPENDIX A I ANALYICAL PROCEDURES

.ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INC. I

Analytical Methodology

100 Physical Properties i • EPA Method Number (except as noted) Color I Spectrophotometric Method 110.3 Conductance Specific Conductance Metho d120.1 Hardness, Total (mg/1 as CaCO..) Titrimetric, EDTA Method 130.2 PH Electrometric Method 150.1 Residue Non-Filterable m Gravimetric, Dried At 103-105°C Method 160.2 Total Gravimetric, Dried at 103-105 c Method 160.3 Volatile K Gravimetric, Ignition at 550 C Method 160.4 Settleable Matter I Volumetric, Imhoff Cone Method 160.5 Temperature Thermoraetric Method 170.1 Kit Turbidity Nephelometric Method 180.1

!•m ! 200 Metals Atomic Absorption Sectio n200.0 fe Aluminum AA, Direct Aspiration Method 202.1 Chelation/Extraction with MIBK STD Method 303.D I Criochrome Cyanine R Method STD Method 306.B Antimony AA, Direct Aspiration Method 204.1 Arsenic AA, Hydride Method 206.3

ENVIRONMENTAL LABOPATDRIgS INC R

Barium Method 208 1 f 1 Beryllium Method 210 1 Boron i Color ime trie, Curcumin Method 212 3 Cadmium 1 AA, Direct Aspiration Method 213 1 Chelation/Extr action with MIBK ... STD Method 303.B L. Calcium Titrimetric, EDTA Method 215 2 •L Chromium AA, Direct Aspiration Method 218.1 P Color imetric Method ... STD Method 312. B Cobalt AA, Direct Aspiration Method 219. 1 P t Copper AA, Direct Aspiration Method 220. 1 Gold AA, Direct Aspiration. Method 231.1 Iron Method 236.1 i Lead Method 239.1 p Chelation/Extr act ion With MIBK ... STD Method 303. B Magnesium r L1 AA, Direct Aspiration* * Method 242. 1 Manganese [ AA, Direct Aspiration* Method 243.1 I;; P.A.N. Method HACH Mercury 1 Cold Vapor , Manual Method 245.1 Method 245.2 Cold Vapor , Sediments Method 245.5 Molybdenum Method 246.L

f" L PMVIQOMMPWTAI i ApnoATno I

Nickel AA, Direct Aspiration Method 249.1 Potassium AA, Direct Aspiration Method 258.1 i Selenium AA, Hydride Method 270.3 I Silver AA, Direct Aspiration Method 272.1 i Sodium AA, Direct Aspiration Method 273.1 Thallium AA, Direct Aspiration Method 279.1 Tin e AA, Direct Aspiration Method 282.1 Titanium AA, Direct Aspiration Method 283.1 Vanadium i AA, Direct Aspiration Method 286.1 Zinc i AA, Direct Aspiration Method 289.1 300 Inorganic, Non-metallics Acidity Titrimetric Method 305.1 Alkalinity Titrioetric (pB 4.5) Method 310.1 Bromide Colorimetric, STD Method 405.0 Chloride Argentometric Method STD Method 407.A i Chlorine, Total Residual DPD Method , BACH i Cyanid e Amenable to Chlorination Titrimetric, Spectrophotometric Method 335.1 Total

I i A or^n A vr*r*>f E

Titriraetric, Spectrophotoraetric Method 335.2 Fluoride SPADNS Method STD Method 413.C Nitrogen Ammonia i Nesslerization STD Method 417.8 Distillation/Nesslerization STD Method 417.A I Kjeldahl, Total Colorimetric; Titriraetric; Potentiotnetric.. Method 351.3 Macro-Kjeldahl Method STD Method 420.A Nitrate Cadmium Reduction Method Method 353.3 Nitrite Colorimetric STD Method 419.0 Oxygen, Dissolved Membrane Electrode Method 360.1 Modified Winkler (Full Bottle Technique).... Method 360.2 Phosphorus Coloriraetric, Ascorbic Acid, I Single Reagent Method 365. 2 Sulfate I Turbidimetric ". Method 375.4 Sulfide Titrinetric, Iodine Method 376.1 1 Colorimetric, Methylene Blue Method 376.2 Sulfite [ Titrimetric Method 377.1 400 Organics Biochemical Oxygen Demand BOD (5 day, 20°C) Method 405.1 Chemical Oxygen Demand Titrimetric, Mid-Level Method 410.1 I Titrimetric , Low Level Method 410.2 Oil and Grease, Total Recoverable Gravimetric, Separatory Funnel Extraction... Method 413.1 Soxhlet Extraction Method STD Method 503.C Organic Carbon, Total Combustion or Oxidation Method 415.1

i ApnoATnoicc twr f

Phenolica, Total Recoverable Spectrophotoraetric, Manual 4-AAJ? with Distillation Method 420.1 Methylene Blue Active Substances (MBAS) i Coloriraetric Method 425.1 Bacteria Total Colif ona STD Method 909 .A I Fecal Coliform STD Method 909.C Standard Plate Count STD Method 907.0 r Gas Chromatography Purgeable Halocarbons Method 601.0 Purgeable Aromatics Method 602.0 Acrolein and Acrylonitrile Method 603.0 f Phenols Method 604.0 Benzidines Method 605.0 Phthalate Esters Method 606.0 Nitroaanines Method 607.0 Pesticides and PCSa Method 608.0 Nitroaromatics and Isophorone Method 609.0 c Pol/nuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Method 610.0 Halo«thers Method 611.0 Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Method 612.0 i 2,3,7,8 - Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Method 613.0 Purgeables Method 624.0 Base/Neutrals, Acids and Pesticides Method 625.0 i Halogenated Volatile Organics... Method 8010.0 Nonhalogenated Volatile Organics Method 8015.0 Aromatic Volatile Ocganics Method 8020.0 Hazardous Waste Ignitability Pensky - Martens Closed-Cup Method Method 1010.0 Setaflash Closed-Cup Method Method 1020.0 Corrosivity Corrosivity toward Steel Method 1110.0 Reactivity Section 2.1.3(3) i Extraction Procedure Toxicity Method 1310.0

6NVIPONM6NTAL LABORATORIES. INC. References Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, SPA 600/4-79-020, CJ.S. EPA Washington, DC 1979 i 2. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, I 15th edition. APHA ­ AWWA ­ WPCF Washington DC 1981 3. Test Methods foe Evaluating Solid Waste, C SW ­ 846 2nd edition. U.S. EPA, Washington DC 1982

0 r i i

D I i

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES. INC I i I r. c

APPENDIX B i CHAIN OF CUSTODY i

I

I-

ENVIPONMPMTAi i AonoATnoiee I

SAMPLING - Chain of Custody

I

I 0

NAME AND ADDRESS OF ORGANIZATION COLLECTING SAMPLES Persoerson Collectinoecng Samplampee /?%*%*>* jv/2 /^4gg%^^^Sample No. S*7-< \> (siicyraturej EJ Date Collected jy/<26/tf'7 Time Collected /3.f#o X Place Collected ;S/r/?£o£ I I

G y i e E

Request SAMPLING ANALYSIS REQUEST

PART I; Field Section

Collector Date Sampled • Time i^-.so x/whours Affiliation of Sampler • Address number street city statt ztf> Telephone (flgjj)

LABORATORY SAMPLE COUECTOR'S TYPE OF NUMBER SAMPLE NO. SAMPLE* FIELD INFORMATION** f Analysis Requested u/*r*# - O*fG- «.

• ^ / xx/ ' / r Sptclil Handling and/or Storage t

PART II: LABORATORY SECTION**

Recel vtd by T1 11

Analysis Required ( /

* Indicate whether sample 1s soil, sludge, ttc. **Use bade of page for additional Information relative to sample location I

SAMPLING - Chain of Custodv i I o i i

L

Ml IO i e i F r

I Data SetCDEP - 7

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC. I o n g I n » o r s A i c I o n t I i t i

§ 0 I I f NORTHEAST UTILITIES General Offices • Selden Street. Berlin. Connecticut P O. BOX 270

; HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 •0"« M-- 6 1985 RECEIVED D00870 i Mr. Denni s Cunningham, Assistant Director MAY 7 Water Resources Unit Department of Environmental Protection WATER RESOURCES I State Offic e Building UNIT 165 Capitol Avenue Hartford, Connecticut 06106 r Dear Mr. Cunningham: Devon Station r Intake Dredging The accumulation of silt in front of the intake structure at The Connecticut Light and Power Company's (CL&P) Devon Station is causing corrosion and pitting in the condenser tubes. Northeast Utilities Service Company (NUSCO), on behalf of CL&P, has applied to the Corps of Engineers and hereby applies to The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Water Resources Unit, for a permit pursuant to dredge approximately 2,500 cubic yards from the area in front of the intake structure. Sediment samples were taken at nine locations and submitted for analysis. i Enclosed is a copy of the soils analysis and a copy of the application to the Corps of Engineers. i The dredge d material will be contained on site by a gravel dike above the mean high water line until dewatered. After dewatering, the material will be removed by outside contractor and disposed of at an approved landfill. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Thomas P. Arcari, NUSCO Generation Facilities Licensing, at (203) 665-3713.

Very truly yours, NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY As Agent For The Connecticut Light and Power Company L

I R. A. Reckert Vice President Enclosures I cc: LTC. Edward D. Hammond, Division Engineer New England Division Corps of Engineers 42* Trapelo Road Waltham, Massachusetts 0225* ENVIRONMENTAL

MV I L-.^-J SCIENCE LAB. REPORT NO. *S-v-S* CORPORATION Laboratory Report ^**4^"^ C - 519 /».O. BOX 616 State Certification No. PH-0476 ) WALNUT STREET • MIODLETOWN. CONN. 06457 TELEPHONE: 347-6961

-, DATE CLIENT r March 29, 1985

i Mr. Nick Lanzalotta CLIENT Northeast Utilities PHONE NO 666-6911 P.O. Box 270 1 Hartford, CT 06101 L J

*"K SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS It Devon Station Intake Sedement Study Samples taken 3-28-85 . . P.0.# 050766 1 1 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS

Bottom Sedement Samples COMPOSITE SAMPLE SAMPLE of 1 - 7 #8 #9 % Volatile 3.0% 1.9% 0.3% 1 mg/1 mg/1 mg/1 Oil & Grease 200 200 300 | •1 Mercury <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

OflfuHlt jrn 0.46 0.32 0.14 1 f^pnym\ im 82 69 47

1 Copper 144 80 48 Arsenic <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 i 1 Zinc 114 103 55 Nickel 13.3 8.5 5.75 1 PPM PPM PPM L PCB < 1 < 1 < 1

• REMARKS

i

April 22, 1985

DATE REPORTED ENVIRONMENTAL

SCIENCE LAB. REPORT NO. CORPORATION Laboratory Report . C - 519 State Certification No. PH-0476 'ALNUT STREET • MIDDLETOWN, CONN. 06457 TELEPHONE: 347-6961

DATE March 29, 1985 CLIENT ~l i Mr. Nick Lanzalotta CLIENT Northeast Utilities PHONE N 0 666-6911 P.O. Box 270 Hartford, CT 06101 L J - SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. i Devon Station Intake Sedement Study Samples Taken 3-28-85 rj P.O. #050766 t SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS

( F Particle Size COMPOSITE SAMPLE SAMPLE Distribution of 1 - 7 n #9 I, Micrometer Inches % % 7, I < 75 3.7 1.4 0.6 75 .0029 33.7 6.0 2.4 1 150 .0059 49.6 60.3 60.8 500 »CT .0197 11.0 25.3 34.4

Millimeters

2.36 .0973 1.8 3.3 1.5 4.75 0.187 0.2 1.5 0.3 6.7 0.265 0.0 2.2 0.0 L f

April 22. 1985 DATE REPORTED LABOHATONY DIRECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL

SCIENCE LAB. REPORT NO CORPORATION Laboratory Report C - 519

State Certification No. PH-0476 •ALNUT STREET • MIDDLETOWN. CONN. 06457 TELEPHONE: 347-6961

CLIENT ~] DATE March 29, 1985 Mr. Nick Lanzalotta i Northeast Utilities PHONNE NO 666-6911 P.O.Box 270 Hartford, CT 06101 1 L J

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS I. Devon Station Intake Sedement Study Samples Taken 3-28-85 P P.O. #050766 1- SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS

F Composite Sample of 1 - 7 35/1 I EP Toxicity i Arsenic < 0.05 Barium < 0.1 Cadmium < 0.01 1 Chromium < 0.05 Mercury < 0.002 I Lead < 0.05 Selenium < 0.01 Silver < 0.05

IEMARKS

99 IQflS (k. LABORATORY DIRECTOR I REPORTED i i I

TV 00? rn •2.

c i I , I I * r L I? mI I I 1s b- - c KIVGR FLOW­

PLAU 60 75

^ £L.-t5-00'

PROPOSED /M7*K£ DttDG/UG AT

BY UGHT epowex co. tv&s f

Y 470KA66 AREA Of I

Data Set CDEP - 8

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC. »ngln»»ri A i c I a n t I s ti I ATERIALS 1ESTING, INC.

-1117 MAIN STREET • STRATFORD, CONNECTICUT 06497 (203) 378-1627 r 3 vPMAH ROAD . MARL BOROUGH, CONNECTICUT 06424 • (203) 295-C330 [ " ST1LLMAN STREET • BRIDGEPORT, CONNECTICUT 06608 • (203) 378-1627 i• DATF 10-23-82 Rowan Building Systems, Inc. P. 0. Box 133 REPORT NO S-1000R* n IENT - South-oort. Conn. 06490

D • m^ m \ l ^ n R IL» x. J • 1 m / 3 M )1 r Harbour Woods East PROJECT Stratford. Conn. JA/ i N• f on M1 1983 r i SHR1PCT Soil Analysis WATER RFSQUilcrq

Sampled: 10-12-82 by Materials Testing, Inc. Location: As Per Drawing Dated 5-26-82. Sheet 2 of 14

Sample Number — 1A 2A Percent of Water 55.12 56.07 Percent Oil & Grease 1.89 2.01 Percent Volatile Solids 8.4 7.1 Grain Size - Percent Retained #200 73.10 72.07 #325 5-70 5.55

F i- Copper % 0.20 0.17 Lead ppm 289 308 f-h- Zinc % 0.14 0.11 Cadmium ppm 13 13 Chromium ppm 729 736 Nickel ppm 133 130 Arsenic ppm 0.1 0.1 r Mercury ppm 0.01 0.01 i L PCB's ppm 1.8 2.0

Test Methods: Percent Oil and Grease - Hexane Extract Percent Volatile Solids - NED Method

I rials i/ff esting^Inc

2cc. Client Frank A. Soucy * Revised to show Correct Function K M ENGINEERING 3060 MAIN ST STRATFORD, CT 06497 (203)375-2766

• t- StT.&tf,

LOCATION MAP IN HOUSATONIC RIVER AT STRATFORD, CONN COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD STATE CONN. APPLICATION BY HARBOUR WOODS EAST O Oi OZ O3 OA O.5 M,'L£5 SHEET_LOFJ4_ DATE'5-26-82 E

K.M. ENGINEERING 3060 MAIN ST. STftATFORD, CT. 06497 (203)375-2766

i I

©SAMPLL-l** o/-\ivir I_L­ A , f r^-J

I * ^ : "i-hv? "" ^ f I • §T rj •'. ^ ". ' '*« |S I

ISAMPLE 2A

L L I

C 15 30 43 e REVISED 11/17/82 ....•'N7Y OF FAIRFIELD STATE CONN! ;. A"? LiCAT.'ON 8Y HARBOUR WOODS EAST Housaionic '' T.. OFJ4. DATE'- 3-26-82 I

I m£.«<

Data Set CDEP - 9

BLASLAND. BOUCK A LEE. INC. »ngln»»rt ft t o I o n t Ii t t ANNUAL MONITORING REQUIREMENTS NPDES Permit: October 1981 Dan Beard, Incorporated

Submitted to: Director of Water Compliance Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection State Office Building Hartford, CT 06115

Submitted by: Management of Resources and the Environment (MRE) 41-C New London Turnpike Glastonbury, CT 06033 I. INTRODUCTION

This report was prepared In accordance with requirements of a Permit Issued to Dan Beard, Inc., on September 21, 1979, which allows for dredging operations in the Rousatonic River at Shelton, Connecticut. Section 8a of the permit requires that the dredging be monitored for i suspended solids. The method of monitoring required in the permit is by use of a transmlssometer to detect any change of sediment loadings on I the receiving waters associated with the working dredge. Section 8b of the permit requires that physical and chemical parameters of the sedi­ ment be analysed and a grain size distribution for each station be done. r II. MONITORING DETAILS i A. Permit Requirements r 1. Suspended Solids During low water conditions of each year, a trans­ i missometer study is to be completed; two stations, one five hundred feet above the working dredge and one opposite the Sunnyside School boat launching ramp in Shelton are to be occupied over a complete tidal cycle i (high-tid e to high-tide, or low-tide to low-tide) on two different days concurrent with the symetrlcally encompassing normal dredging operations on each study day.

Each station shall be transect across the river and include three substations: one in midchannel and two about twenty-five percent of the width of the river from each shore. Vertical profiles shall be taken at four foot intervals from the surface to the bottom of the river at each substation along both transects. Both stations are to be occupied approximately hourly. I 2. Long Term Monitoring of Chemical and Physical Parameters

Sediment samples are to be analysed during low flow conditions for heavy metals including cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel and zinc, oil and grease, volatile solids and PCB's. A physical grain size analysis including raw data and average grain size distribution is required. Samples are to be taken at four stations located midchannel I 1,000 ft. south of the working dredge, at the northern tip of Two Mile Island, off the southern tip of Two Mile Island, and at the Sunny- side School boat ramp. As-built bathymetry of the dredge area from the L northern tip of Two Mile Island upstream is required also.

B. Equipment Utilized

1. Transmlssometer

The transmissometer used for the study was made by Hydro Products of San Diego, California, and rented from the Tetra Tech Cor­ poration of Pasadena, California. The equipment consisted of 2 parts, I the readout meter and the sensor assembly. The readout meter is cali­ brated in percentage transmittance of 0-100Z. The sensor consists of 2 I sections, one containing a light projection and a detection device to r DIFFUSOR CLEAR ACRYLIC WINDOW CLEAR ACRYLIC WINDOW IELD STOP LENS ASSY S ASSY FIEIrD STOP T SENSOR

I LIGHT SOPPCE ttGHT RECEIVER - ­ I Figure 1. Transmissotneter Sensor Assembly 2 read the transmittance over a 10 centimeter light path. The sensor and detector are housed In a plastic cylinder to prevent drainage while being lowered into the dredging plume. Power was supplied by a 12 volt automobile battery.

> As shown in Figure 1, projector consists of a lamp, diffuser, field stop and lens arranged in such a manner as to generate a collimated beam of light. The projector and detector are mechanically aligned so that the beam of light is centered on the lens of the de­ tector. The detector consists of a lens, field stop, photocell and preamplifier arranged so the light beam is focused on the photocell. The projector and detector may be either 10 cm or 1 meter apart, de­ pending on whether or not the 1 meter extension tube is being used.

The amount of light striking the photocell will be de­ pendent upon the transmissibility of the medium through which the light must pass (typically water).

III. METHODOLOGY

A. Transmissometer

The transraissometer study was performed on October 17 and October 22 , 1981, Measurements were made at two stations each day as required by the permit. The northern location was 500 feet north of the working dredge. The dredge was located 1200 yards north of Two Mile Island and 100 feet east of the Shelton shoreline. The southern station for measurements was located 1,000 feet downstream of the dredge where evidence of the dredge plume no longer existed.

The station located upstream of the dredge is identified as the North Station, the one 1,000 feet downstream is the South Section. At each location, the station is further subdivided as follows: Sta­ tion W is halfway between the west bank and midstream; Station M is raid- stream, Station E is halfway between midstream and the east bank. E

TRAHSHISSOMETER STATIONS October 17, 1981 October 22, 1981

brth Station Location of Dredge on 10/17/81 4 10/22/81

••• • - •'•'••,. ":•-, ^^JWj lluk/A/ I

outh Station

T.rtl. i figure j

SEDIMENT SAMPLING STATIONS i location of Dredge I on 9/24/81 F ^4^m3^srna yaasssafms%^«^ F Station 4

L Station 3

Station 2

Station 1

Y.rd. Measurements were taken from surface toward the bottom by suspending the transmissometer from the side of a small boat. Stations are shown in Figure 2.

Prior to the start of each days testing the transmissometer vas calibrated by immersing the probe into clean water and setting readout transmittance at 99Z. A light path length of 10 cm vas used.

The distance between stations and the number of repetitive tests required necessitated a change in procedure from that outlined in the permit. Ihe findings reflect the maximum number of tests possible to be taken. The level of detail, coverage of the operation and findings of the data support the original intent of the monitoring requirements.

B. Sediment Sampling

A Petersen Dredge, weighing seventy (70) pounds and capable of taking a grab sample of 600 to 680 cubic inches of sediment was used. The sample area measures 16 centimeters by 26 centimeters (416 square centimeters). The dredge was slowly lowered from the side of the boat and samples recovered were divided for analysis, % into glass Jars to be tested for PCB's, % into glass jars to be analyzed for the remaining parameters. • Four stations, shown in Figure 3, were sampled.

IV. RESULTS

A. Transmissometer

Results of the transmissometer readings are given in the following table. Tidal cycle, tide time, depth and percent transmittance are given. DAY 1; October 17. 1981

Tidal cycle: around low tide Tidal tine: 2 hours before low tide

Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - East Channel I Depth -2 -A -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 r Z Transmlttance 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Depth -18 -20 -22 -2A -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 F Z Transmittance 69 69 69 69 69 68.5 68.5 68.5 68.5

Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - Middle Channel

Depth -2 -A -6 -8 -10 -12 -1A -16 -18 Z Transmit tance 71 71 71 70 70 70 70 70 70

Depth -20 -22 -2A -26 -28 -30 -32 2 Transmittance 70 70 70 70 70 70 70

Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - West Channel Depth -2 -A -6 -8 -10 Z Transmittance 72 73 73 73 73

Tidal cycle: around low tide Tidal time: 1:35 before low tide Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - East Channel Depth -2 -A -6 -8 -10 -12 -1A -16 -18 2 Transmittance 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 I Depth -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 Z Transmittance 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70

Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - Middle Channel ! Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 Z Transmittance 72 72 71 71 71 71 71 71 71

-22 -24 -26 -30 -32 -34 Depth -20 -28 1 Z Transmittance 70.5 70.5 70 70 70 70 70 70 r Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - West Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 r Z Transmittance 72 71 71 71 70 70 70 c Depth -16 -18 -20 -22 -24 -26 Z Transmittance 70 70 70 69 69 69 E.i Tidal cycle: around low tide 1 Tidal time: 20 minutes before low tide Station: North of dredge - East Channel 1 Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 r Z Transmittance 70 69 70 69 69 69 69 69 69 E Depth -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 fe Z Transmittance 69 69 69 69 69 69

| Station: Nortohf dredge - Middle Channel

Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18

Z Transmittance 70 70 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 1 Depth -20 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 -36 Z Transmittance 71 71 71 70 70 70 69 68 Station: 1forth of idredge - East Channe 1 Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 Z Transmit tance 70 70 70 69 70 69 69 69 70 Depth -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -20 -32 -34 I Tr«n»mittance 69 69 69 69 68 69 68 68

DAY 2: October 22, 1981 Tidal cycle: Around high tide Tidal time: 1:25 before high tide Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - Vest Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 Z Transmittance 69 69 69 69 Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - Middle Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 Z Transmittance 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 t. Depth -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 Z Transmittance 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Station: 1,000 yards downstream of dredge (Sunnyside) - East Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 Z Transmittance 65 66 66 66 66 67 67 67 67

Depth -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32

2 Transmittance 67 67 67 67 67 67 67

Tidal cycle: around high tide Tidal tine:. 1:10 before high tide Station: Above dredge - West Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 Z Transmittance 70 69 68 68 i Station: Above dredg e- Middle Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 I Transmittance 69 68 68 68 68 67 I Depth -14 -16 -18 -20 I Transmit tance 67 67 67 67 Station: Above dredge - East Channel • Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 ™ I Transmittance 69 69 69 69 69 69 68 68 P Depth -18 -20 -22 -24 -26

Z Transmittance 68 68 68 68 68 ra:======^ [ Tidal cycle: Around high tide P Tidal time: 15 minutes before high tide \ 13 Station: 1,000 yards south of dredge (Sunnyside) - East Channel T Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 Z Transmittance 69 69 68 68 68 68 68 68

I Depth -18 -20 -22 I Z Transmittance 68 68 68 Station: 1,000 yards south of dredge (Sunnyside) - Middle Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18

Z Transmittance 69 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68

Depth -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 -34 Z Transmittance 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Station: 1,000 yards south of dredge (Sunnyside)- West Channel

Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 Z Transmittance 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Depth -20 -22 -24 -26 -28 -30 -32 Z Transmittance 68 68 68 68 67 66 66

10 i Tidal cycle: around high tide Tidal time: 30 minutes after high tide Station: North of dredge - West Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 I Transmittance 68 68 66 66 Station: North of dredge - Middle Channel

i Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 I Z Transmittance 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 Depth -16 -18 -20 -22 i: Z Transmittance 68 68 68 68 Station: North of dredge - East Channel Depth -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 Z Transmittance 65 65 65 65 65 65 65

Depth -16 -18 -20 -22

Z Transmittance 65 65 65 65 I

I Transmissometer readings above and below the dredge were within the 5% Transmittance range allowed by the permit on both days of the testing.

B. Chemical Analysis

Chemical analysis of the sediments are shown in the attached laboratory reports. The stations and results are labelled as follows:

Sample //I - Sunnyside Sample #2 - South of TMI Sample //3 - North of TMI Sample #4 - 1,000 feet south of dredge located at confluence of Naugatuck on September 24, 1981 C. Physical Grain Size Analysis

The results of the physical grain size analysis is given in the attached laboratory report.

12 I MILFORD MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORY, INC. 655 Plains Rd. • Milford, Connecticut 06460 i (203) 877-3163 j fo: Management of Resources of The Environment June 13, 1990 i PO B5x 17-332 Test M47024 KEst Hartford. CT. 06117-0322 _ Mllford'' COBB 0646° fi Att: Mr. Kenneth MacGregor From: Burt M. St. Clair Re: Exam of bottom sediment I Source: Beard Co. - Housatonic River, Shelton, CT. Rec'd 6/4/90

Grain Size Analysis Sieve No. % Retained 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 0 0 0 1.7 0 5.6 10 .40 .80 .60 1.4 .60 15.8 40 13.0 58.0 58.9 66.6 62.6 61.9 200 82.6 40.5 39.6 29.8 36.4 15.2 nass 200 4.0 .50 .30 .40 .10 .80

As Rec'd Water 24.79 20.07 19.80 20.82 20.78 19.68% Oil + Grease .011 .003 .002 .006 .002 .002% Volatile Sol ids .62 .13 .16 .13 .14 .17% n

Burt M. St. Clair CORPORATION Laboratory Report C-0751 P.O.IOX616 Sute Certification No. PH-0476 7 WALNUTSTfff £T • UIDDLETOWH. CONN. 06457 TCLEPHONC: 347-9991

r °*TE September 24, 1981

M TJ "E* CLIENT 41 C New London Turnpike PHONE NO. i Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 J t INSTRUCTIONS; SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS

Sample #1 Cadmium 0.?8 mg/kg F. Copper mg/kg Zinc 152 mg/kg & Chromium - total 39.5 mg/kg Nickel 16.3 mg/kg I Oil & Grease 400 mg/kg Volatile Solids 0.34 2 I PCB 14 ppb

EMARKS

All metals calculated on dry basis. I e oer 14, 1981 OATC It C PORTED LABOR ATO» V LAB REPORT NO.

CORPORATION Laboratory Report C-0841

f.O.8OX61S State Certification No. PH-0476 SO WALNUT STREET • MIDOLETOWN. CONN. 06457 TELEPHONE: 3*7-6961

CLIENT DATE November 23, 19 8l

CLIENT M.R.E. PHONE 41 C New London Turnpike Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 J I MSPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. n r SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS M.R.E. Sediment* Cadmium 5 .66 mg/kg r­ Sample # 2 Copper 64 . 6 mg/kg fcr; Zinc 717 mg/kg 1' Chromiun 20 . 9 ng/kg Nickel 75 rr.g/kg 1 Oil & Grease 120 mg/kg Volatile Solids 4 .7 * 1 PCB 161 PPb

REMARKS & *A11 metals done on dry basis. I I November 10. 1981 DATE KlfOKTID LABOMATOKT OIKCCTOM w^G n c r ^ r\ i CORPORATION Laboratory Report C-0751 f.O.fOXgtf State (Unification No. PH-0476 "0 WALNUT STREET . UIDDLETOWN. CONN. 06457 TELEPHONE: 347-6991

r DATE September 24, 1981

M. R. tt • CLIENT 41 C New London Turnpike PHONE NO,633-3571 i Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033

BPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:

[ • 1 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS

' Sample #3 Cadmium 2.95 mg/kg f Copper 387 mg/kg Zinc 318 mg/kg b Chromium - total 171 mg/kg Nickel 45.5 mg/kg 1 Oil & Grease 100 mg/kg Volatile Solids 0.5 % 1 PCS 48 ppb r

I,EMARKS I I ctober 14, 1981 CORPORATION Laboratory Report C-0751 P.O. BOX 616 State Certification No. PH-0476 "»WALNUT5TH££T . MIODLBTOWN. CONN. 06457 T£L£fHONE: 347-SM1

r DATE September 2^4, 1981

•M.R.E. CLIENT ^11 C New London Turnpike PHONE NO. 633-3571 Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033

J

PECIAU INSTRUCTIONS:

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS

Sample Cadmium 7.05 mg/kg Copper 955 mg/kg Zinc 2880 mg/kg Chromium - total mg/kg Uickel 95 mg/kg I Oil 4 Grease 100 mg/kg I Volatile Solids 2.9 PCB 59 ppb

1 EMAAKS

**Vf

1

October 1 Ll i CORPORATION Laboratory Report C-0751 r.o.goxstt Sute Cenification No. PH-0476 V WALNUT STREET • MIDDLETOWN. CONN. 06457 TELEPHONE: 347-S9C1

~i DATE September 24, 1981

M«R.E• CLIENT 41 C New London Turnpike 'HONENO-633-3571 i Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 L J •SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: | Dan Beard-AnnuaSedimenl t Samnline MRE-04A h Transect 1 Particle Size & Distribution \ SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS p. Grain Size Transect 1 r Particle Size % Particle Size x % F­ ^•:Tyler No. mm E M w f3 6.7 26.1 17.4 62.9 35.5 l?<4 4.75 16.0 5-6 4.3 8.6 8 2.36 26.0 13.8 4.6 14.8 1 Micrometers 35 500 26.1 36.4 15.2 25.9 Iloo 150 15.4 11.5 10.3 200 75 1.2 9.7 1.0 4.0 HOD <75 <1.0 1.5 1.0 0.8

EVIARKS I • October 21, 1981 ^L H o, J, V OlMCCTOft ^ LAB REPORT NO CORPORATION Laboratory Report C-0751 P.O. tax sie State Certification No. PH-0476 0 WALNUT STREET • MIDOLfTOWN. CONN. 06457 TELEPHONE: 347-6961

:UICNT DATE September 24, 1981

M. R« £• CLIENT 41 C New London Turnpike PHONE NO. 633-3571 Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033

•SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. 1 Dan Beard - Annual Sediment Sampling MRE-04A I Transect 2 Particle Size & Distribution J SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS Grain Size Transect 2 Particle Size % Particle Size [1 Tyler No. m m Transect M W k 3 6.7 4.6 1.5 4.75 3.4 1.1 2.36 3.4 1.1 I

Micrometers I 35 500 5.7 2.0 2.6 100 150 41.4 63.6 32.5 45-8 200 75 27.6 12.6 25.2 21.8 <200 <75 13.8 21.8 42.3 26.0

REMARKS

I

I October 21, 1981 CORPORATION Laboratory Report C-0751 P.O. BOX 616 State Certification No. PH-0476 SO WALNUT STREET • HIDDLETOWN, CONN. 06457 TELEfHONE: 347-6991

r ~i DATE September 24, 1981

M.R.K> CLIENT 41 C New London Turnpike PHONE NO. 633-3571 Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 i J

BPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: k T PaT1 W»aT«H _ Annual -QpH "f mPTTl •ncr MPTT_nilA { • Transect 3 Particle Size & Distribution

fy SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS

PGraln Size Transect t. _3_ Particle Size % Particle Size x % l^Tyler No. m m Transect E M W r«3 6.7 1.4 16.7 6.0 £4 4.75 1.4 5.0 2.1 fr;8 2.36 l.'l 7.4 13-8 7-5

• Micrometers 35 500 59.6 22.3 28.7 100 150 18.2 25-5 34.5 26.1 1 200 75 38.5 2.9 5.0 15-5 E<200 <75 37.8 1.7 2.6 13.8

EMARKS

£./,'i

I H. i_^ c. n c ­

CORPORATION Laboratory Report C-0751 P.O.IOXS16 State Certification No PH-0476 3 WALNUT STREET • MlDDLETOWN. CONN. 06457 TELEPHONE: 347-6991

DATE ' JLIENT r ~i September 24, 1981

CLIENT PHONE NO. 41 C New London Turnpike 633-3571 i Qlastonbury, Connecticut 06033 • L J •SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. 1 Dan Beard - Annual Sediment Samoline MRE-04A

r Trpnsprt 4 Parti rl* S17P ft mesr.rHbnrlnn 1 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST RESULTS

Grain Size Transect 4 Particle Size %, Particle Size x % Tyler No. m m Transect E M W Is 6.7 4 4.75 2.36 I8 Micrometers I 500 2.2 2.4 1.5 2.0 31050 150 23-9 44.2 19-7 29.3 §200 75 34.9 33.7 46.7 38.4 <200 <75 39.1 19.6 31.6 30.1 i

I IEMARKS I I October 21. 1981 ^_~>U