DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 DEEP Integrated Water Quality Report.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1 -Connecticut Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology (CT CALM) ................... 5 Chapter 2 – 305(b) Assessment Results ................................................................................................ 30 Chapter 3 - Waterbodies Identified for Restoration and Protection Strategies Pursuant to Section 303 of the Clean Water Act ................................................................................................................. 204 References ........................................................................................................................................... 348 Figure 1-1. Connecticut Rivers and Lake Basins Index ........................................................................ 11 Figure 1-3. Macroinvertebrate Multimetric Index (MMI) model results showing the predicted stream health condition. ............................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 1-4. Hypoxia map interpolations are overlain on a map of sampling station locations and assessment units to assist with evaluating excursions below the dissolved oxygen criterion. ....... 21 Figure 1-5. Assessment units overlain on shellfish growing area classifications in Long Island Sound. ............................................................................................................................................. 26 Figure 1-6. Example of pivot table report showing percentage of segment area falling under each CT DA/BA classifications. ................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 2-1. Waterbody segments assessed for one or more designated uses ........................................ 30 Figure 2-2. Waterbody segments assessed for Aquatic Life Use Support (ALUS) .............................. 32 Figure 2-3. Aquatic Life Use Support (ALUS) in Connecticut Rivers ................................................ 33 Figure 2-4. Aquatic Life Use Support (ALUS) in Connecticut Lakes ................................................. 34 Figure 2-5. Aquatic Life Use Support (ALUS) in Connecticut Estuaries ............................................ 35 Figure 2-6. Waterbody segments assessed for Recreational Use Support (REC) ................................. 36 Figure 2-7. Recreational Use Support (REC) in Connecticut Rivers ................................................... 37 Figure 2-9. Recreational Use Support (REC) in Connecticut Estuaries .............................................. 39 Figure 2-10. Waterbody segments assessed for Shellfishing Use Support. ......................................... 40 Figure 2-11. Shellfishing Use Support in Connecticut Estuaries ......................................................... 41 Figure 2-12. Statewide statistical assessment for aquatic life in wadeable streams in Connecticut. .... 43 Figure 2-13. Comparing Connecituct lakes to the Nation based on Total Nitrogen from the 2007 National Lakes Assessment in Connecticut.................................................................................... 45 Figure 2-14. Comparing Connecituct lakes to the Nation based on Total Phosphorus from the 2007 National Lakes Assessment in Connecticut.................................................................................... 46 Figure 2-15. Comparing Connecituct lakes to the Nation based on Chlorophyll-a from the 2007 National Lakes Assessment in Connecticut.................................................................................... 47 Figure 2-16. Comparing Connecituct lakes to the Nation based on Secchi Depth from the 2007 National Lakes Assessment in Connecticut.................................................................................... 48 Figure 3-1 Key Components of Water Quality Attainment ................................................................ 204 Figure 3-2: Water Quality Planning and Implementation Process ..................................................... 205 Figure 3-3. Total segments in US EPA Category 4 and 5 .................................................................. 207 Figure 3-4 Cummulative Number of Approved TMDLs in Connecticut ........................................... 208 Figure 3-5 Subregional Basins and Estuaries with Established TMDLs in Connecticut .................... 208 Figure 3-6 In-state Areas Targeted for Nitrogen Reductions .............................................................. 209 Figure 3-7. Freshwaters Targeted for Management Measures of Cultural Eutrophication ................. 210 Figure 3-8. Total segments by Designated Use that require a TMDL or equivalent plan .................. 213 ii Table 1-1. Designated uses for surface waters as described in CT WQS and the IWQR. ...................... 6 Table 1-2. Timeline for submitting data to DEEP and tiered data quality considerations for assessments of the State’s waters. .................................................................................................... 8 Table 1-3. Aquatic Life Use Support (ALUS) categories and contributing decision criteria for wadeable streams. ........................................................................................................................... 15 Table 1-4. Aquatic Life Use Support (ALUS) in estuaries as determined by dissolved oxygen levels. .............................................................................................................................................. 19 Table 1-5. Fish consumption use support and criteria. ........................................................................ 22 Table 1-6. Shellfish harvesting use support as determined by shellfish growing area classifications .. 24 Table 1-7. Decision criteria for various categories of recreational use support. ................................... 28 Table 2-1. Designated use support summaries for rivers, lakes and estuaries. .................................... 31 Table 2-2. Statewide statistical assessment for aquatic life in wadeable streams in Connecticut. ....... 42 Table 2-3. Statewide statistical assessment for recreation in wadeable streams in Connecticut. ......... 42 Table 2-4. Connecticut 305b Assessment Results for Rivers and Streams ........................................... 49 Table 2-5. Connecticut 305b Assessment Results for Lakes .............................................................. 137 Table 2-6. Connecticut 305b Assessment Results for Estuaries ......................................................... 151 Table 2-7. Site Specific Fish Consumption Advisories. ..................................................................... 198 Table 3-1: Designated Uses for Surface Waters in Connecticut ........................................................ 205 Table 3-2. Definitions of US EPA Categories 4 and 5 for Assessed Waterbodies in Connecticut .... 206 Table 3-3 Summary of Designated Uses with Common Stressors ..................................................... 212 Table 3-4. Connecticut Impaired Waters List (EPA Category 5) ....................................................... 216 Table 3-5. Waterbodies with Adopted TMDLs .................................................................................. 265 Table 3-6. Pollution Control Measures for Waterbody Segments (EPA Category 4b) ..................... 295 Table 3-7. Nonpollutant Impairments (EPA Category 4c) ................................................................. 301 Table 3-8. Reconciliation List of Impaired Waters (Delistings and Listings) ................................... 307 Table 3-9. Priority List for TMDL Development of Impaired Waterbodies ...................................... 336 iii Table of Acronyms 303(d) Section 303(d) of the Federal Clean Water Act, which requires States to employ corrective actions to address waters impaired by one or more pollutants (also referred to the 303(d) list) 305(b) Section 305(b) of the Federal Clean Water Act, which requires States to assess and report on the status of their waters every two years 319(a) Section 319(a) of the Federal Clean Water Act, which requires States to prepare a report that identifies waters impaired by nonpoint source pollution, its sources and programs to reduce such pollution ADB Assessment Database ALUS Aquatic Life Use Support AU Assessment Unit; a section of a waterbody for which water quality is determined CFU Colony Forming Unit for bacteria enumeration CSO Combined Sewer Overflow CT CALM Connecticut Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology CT DA/BA Connecticut Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Aquaculture CT DEP Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (previous name of Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental) CT DPH Connecticut Department of Public Health CT WQS Connecticut Water Quality Standards CTWL Connecticut Section 303d Waters List providing the State’s evaluation of surface water bodies for restoration and protection strategies in accordance with the requirements of Section 303 of the Federal Clean Water Act CWA (Federal) Clean Water Act CWF Connecticut Clean Water Fund DEEP Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection formally known as Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection IWQR Integrated Water Quality Report
Recommended publications
  • List of Ponds Eligible for ANC Treatment Activities

    List of Ponds Eligible for ANC Treatment Activities

    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL PROGRAM This table lists the treatment sites eligible for a Certificate of Coverage (COC) under the Aquatic Nuisance Control General Permit No. ANC9740000, "Aquatic Nuisance Control Activities for Ponds," issued pursuant to Part 33, Aquatic Nuisance Control, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act,1994 PA 451, as amended. If the desired site is on this list, an applicant may submit an application for a COC to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Water Resources Division, Aquatic Nuisance Control. Sites on this list are subject to change. COUNTY WATERBODY NAME TOWNSHIP TOWN RANGE SEC 1 SEC 2 # ELIGIBLE PONDS ALCONA GREGORY'S POND GUSTIN 26N 08E 27 1 ALLEGAN BERENS POND SALEM 04N 13W 5 1 ALLEGAN BUHLER PONDS SALEM 04N 13W 5 2 CENTRAL WESLEYAN CHURCH 04N 15W 6 3 ALLEGAN PONDS FILLMORE CLAREWOOD CONDOMINIUM 04N 16W 1 1 ALLEGAN POND LAKETOWN CLEARBROOK GOLF COURSE 03N 16W 3 10 4 ALLEGAN PONDS SAUGATUCK ALLEGAN COLE POND WATSON 02N 12W 12 1 ALLEGAN CRESTRIDGE HOA POND LAKETOWN 04N 16W 2 1 ALLEGAN DUTCHER POND WAYLAND 03N 11W 23 1 ALLEGAN FLETCHER POND SAUGATUCK 03N 16W 20 1 ALLEGAN GOULD POND FENNVILLE 3N 16W 28 1 ALLEGAN GREEN LAKE POND LEIGHTON 4N 11W 11 1 ALLEGAN HANCOCK POND DORR 04N 12W 33 1 ALLEGAN HARMON, ED POND WAYLAND 03N 11W 2 1 HOLLAND, CITY 04N 15W 9 1 ALLEGAN HAWORTH POND OF HERITAGE MEADOW CONDO 04N 16W 1 4 ALLEGAN PONDS LAKETOWN HERMAN MILLER DESIGN YARD HOLLAND, CITY 04N 15W 6 1 ALLEGAN POND OF ALLEGAN HIDDEN HOLLOW PONDS LAKETOWN 04N 16W 3 2 ALLEGAN HIDDEN WATERS CONDO'S SAUGATUCK 03N 16W 21 1 HIGHFIELD BEACH 01N 17W 24 2 ALLEGAN CONDOMINIUMS CASCO ALLEGAN HOEZEE POND SALEM 04N 13W 15 1 HOLLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS 04N 15W 6 1 ALLEGAN POND FILLMORE ALLEGAN IMCS INC.
  • The Farmington River Watershed Map

    The Farmington River Watershed Map

    Farmington River Watershed Education Curriculum: Elementary FRWA Curriculum Guide Week II Watershed 28 Farmington River Watershed Association Farmington River Watershed Education Curriculum: Elementary Watershed – Background Information “The river moves from land to water to land, in and out of organisms, re- minding us what the native peoples have never forgotten; that you cannot separate the land from the water, or the people from the land. – Lynn Noel, Voyages Canada’s Heritage Rivers A watershed consists of an area of land and water where water drains into particular water basins, such as rivers, lakes, ponds, wetlands, or streams. It encompasses all the land, animals, plants, buildings, towns and people within the area. The precipitation that falls that is not used by the plants or animals travels within the watershed. Land elevation determines the flow of water, while surrounding ridge areas define the boundaries. Farmington River Watershed is a sub-basin of the Connecticut River Watershed. All the tributaries of the Farmington River are included in the watershed. The area of land encompasses 386,000 acres, or 609 square miles, which drains into the Farmington River and its tributaries. Included in the watershed are 10 towns in Massachusetts and 23 towns in Connecticut. The Farmington River, in turn, drains into the Connecticut River. The 81 miles of river begin at an elevation of 2,180 feet in the Berkshire Hills of Becket, MA, traveling 16 miles through Otis and Tolland, and enter Connecticut in Colebrook at 1,300 feet. The west branch river flows through land areas that feature hills, ponds, wetlands and lakes.
  • Regional Recreational Trail Map

    Regional Recreational Trail Map

    Northwest Hills Council of Governments Regional Recreational Trail Map 03_J 01_F 02_A 02_A 02_A North Canaan 01_C 05_A 03_C 05_C Norfolk 04_C Hartland 02_B 03_B 03_A Colebrook 05_B 06_C 04_A 01_F Salisbury 03_I 01_D 04_B 03_H 01_B Canaan 03_G 03_D 06_A 07_E 08_B 07_F 08_A Barkhamsted 08_C 01_A 06_B 07_A Winchester 09_E 11_I 07_C 09_H 09_D 07_B 09_H 11_F 10_C 11_B 07_H 09_G 10_D 07_G 09_E 09_E 12_G 12_B 09_B 10_E 10_B 12_A 13_C 10_G 13_B Sharon 09_E 10_A Goshen 09_E 11_J Cornwall 13_G 12_F 09_I 13_E 11_C New Hartford 09_K 12_H 09_E 10_F 09_C Torrington 11_D 13_A 11_G 11_E 13_F 12_C 13_D 09_E 11_A 11_H 09_A 09_E 09_J 11_G 10_H 18_E 17_E 14_E 14_J Burlington 16_A 14_G 14_I 17_C 17_D 17_B 14_F 16_F 18_A 18_B Litchfield Harwinton 15_A 18_A 14_C Warren 18_F 16_H 16_E 17_G 14_L 17_A 16_C 16_H 17_F 15_C 16_H 17_H 15_B Kent 16_K 18_D 15_E 14_K 15_D 16_G 16_J 16_I 18_C 14_M 16_B 19_B 14_A 20_D 20_D 14_B 16_D 14_O 20_D 19_E 20_A 14_P 19_A Morris 14_N 20_B 20_C 19_D Town Index Code Trail System Town Index Code Trail System Cornwall 10_A Ballyhack Warren 15_A Mattatuck Trail Cornwall 10_B Gold's Pines/Day Preserve Warren 15_B Above All State Park Cornwall 10_C Hart Farm/Cherry Hill Warren 15_C Dorothy Maier Preserve Washington Town Index Code Trail System Cornwall 10_D Rattlesnake Preserve Warren 15_D Wyantenock State Forest Salisbury 01_A Sycamore Field Warren 15_E Coords Preserve Cornwall 10_E Welles Preserve Salisbury 01_B Dark Hollow Litchfield 16_A Stillman-Danaher Preserve Cornwall 10_F Mohawk Mountain Salisbury 01_C Schlesinger Bird Preserve
  • Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program

    Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program

    Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices.
  • Open PDF File, 783.6 KB, for Ten Mile River Watershed 2002 Water

    Open PDF File, 783.6 KB, for Ten Mile River Watershed 2002 Water

    TEN MILE RIVER WATERSHED 2002 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE, JR., SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ARLEEN O’DONNELL, ACTING COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP’s) home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm#wqar Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: • On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); • Microfilmed retained at the State Library; • Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; • Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; • Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; • Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; • Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Bridgewater can apply at their local library for loan of any MA DEP/Division of Watershed Management (DWM) report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester.
  • National Register of Historic Places Received JUL 2 5 Isee Inventory

    National Register of Historic Places Received JUL 2 5 Isee Inventory

    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use omy National Register of Historic Places received JUL 2 5 isee Inventory Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections____________________________________ 1. Name___________________________ historic________N/A____*____________________________________________________ Connecticut State Park and Forest Depression-Era Federal Work Relief and or common Programs Structures Thematic Resource_______________________ 2. Location____________________________ street & number See inventory Forms___________________________-M/Anot for publication city, town______See Inventory Forms _ vicinity of__________________________ state_______Connecticut code 09_____county See Inventory Forms___code " 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district _ X_ public _ X- occupied agriculture museum _ X- building(s) private unoccupied commercial _ X-park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process _ X- Ves: restricted government scientific X thematic being considered - yes: unrestricted industrial transportation group IN/A no military other: 4. Owner of Property Commissionier Stanley Pac name Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection street & number 165 Capitol Avenue city, town___Hartford______________ vicinity of___________state Connecticut
  • The New Deal Versus Yankee Independence: the Failure of Comprehensive Development on the Connecticut River, and Its Long-Term Consequences

    The New Deal Versus Yankee Independence: the Failure of Comprehensive Development on the Connecticut River, and Its Long-Term Consequences

    The New Deal versus Yankee independence: The failure of comprehensive development on the Connecticut River, and its long-term consequences Eve Vogel1 Department of Geosciences, UMass Amherst With assistance from Alexandra Lacy 2011 alumna (BS, Environmental Sciences), UMass Amherst Adapted from: Vogel, Eve and Alexandra Lacy. Forthcoming. The New Deal versus Yankee independence: The failure of comprehensive development on the Connecticut River, and its long-term consequences. The Northeastern Geographer 4 (2) Introduction For a person familiar with federal dams on major rivers in the American West or South, a visit to an Army Corps of Engineers dam in New England’s largest river basin, the Connecticut, can be a startling experience. Instead of an extended reservoir, one looks down from the empty heights and on both sides sees only a small river far below. Nor is there the fanfare – the visitors center, the historical information, the celebratory propaganda. Simply finding one of the Connecticut River’s federal dams can take some effort. None are on the mainstem. One must drive through the bucolic New England byways and forested hills to find a dam on a tributary (See Figure 1). For New Englanders, the near-invisibility of federal dams may not seem surprising. New England’s history and identity, including the Connecticut Valley’s, seem to rest with the small- to medium-scale development of rivers with mill dams during the 17th thru 19th centuries (e.g. Delaney 1983; Steinberg 1991). It might be more startling for many to learn that during the mid- twentieth century, the federal government did build a series of very large dams in the Connecticut Basin, which have had profound effect on the river.
  • 1960 Tment of Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources

    1960 Tment of Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources

    Cage REPRINTED FROM THE 1959·60 DIGEST OF CONNECTICUT Conn Doc ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS TO THE GOVERNOR Ag82 1959/ tment of Agriculture, Conservation and 1960 Natural Resources JOSEPH N. GILL, Commissioner Joseph E. Swider, Deputy Commissiotur Established-1959. Statutory authority-Chapter 422, General Statutes Cmtral Office-650 Main St., Hartford, Tel. JAckson 7-6341 Average number of full-time employees-487 Expenditures 1959-1960-Recurring operating expenditures, $3,962,003; Capital outlay, $430,931 Organization structure-Division of Agriculture; Board of Fisheries and Game; Park and Forest Commissions; Water Resources Commission; Con­ necticut Marketing Authority; Shell Fish Commission; Natural History and Geological Survey; and the Interstate Sanitation Commission . • The Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources, created by Public Act No. 637, 1959 Session of the General Assembly, began operating on October l, 1959. The agency consists of the following previously autonomous agencies: Department of Agriculture; Board of Fisheries and Game; Park and Forest Commission; Water Resources Commission; Connecticut Marketing Authority; Shell Fish Commission; Natural History and Geological Survey; and the Interstate Sanitation Commission. Its basic objectives are to effectuate coordination of the policies and programs of the subordinate agencies incorpor­ ated within it and to provide central administrative direction for these agencies. The Council on Agriculture, Conservation and Natural Resources has the re­ sponsibility of preparing proposed legislation for the 1961 General Assembly to effectively integrate the new department and provide a uniform administrative approach to its interrelated problems. To promote this coordination, the Council was given the authority to make decisions binding upon the subordinate agencies whenever the policies of these agencies conflict.
  • 2018 CT IWQR Appendix

    2018 CT IWQR Appendix

    1 Appendix A-3. Connecticut 305b Assessment Results for Estuaries Connecticut 2018 305b Assessment Results Estuaries Appendix A-3 Waterbody Waterbody Square Segment ID Name Location Miles Aquatic Life Recreation Shellfish Shellfish Class See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, LIS CB Inner - Inner Estuary, Patchogue and Menunketesuck Rivers Patchogue And from mouths at Grove Beach Point, US to saltwater Menunketesuc limits just above I95 crossing, and at I95 crossing NOT Direct CT-C1_001 k Rivers respectively, Westbrook. 0.182 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Consumption See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, LIS CB Inner - Inner Estuary, SB water of inner Clinton Harbor, Inner Clinton including mouths of Hammonasset, Indian, Harbor, Hammock Rivers, and Dudley Creek (includes NOT FULLY Commercial CT-C1_002-SB Clinton Esposito Beach), Clinton. 0.372 SUPPORTING UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, Hammonasset River SB water from LIS CB Inner - mouth at inner Clinton Harbor, US to SA/SB water Hammonasset quality line between Currycross Road and RR track, NOT Commercial CT-C1_003-SB River, Clinton Clinton. 0.072 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting 2 See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, Hayden Creek SB water from mouth LIS CB Inner - at Hammonasset River (parallel with Pratt Road), US Hayden Creek, to saltwater limit near Maple Avenue (off Route 1), NOT Commercial CT-C1_004-SB Clinton Clinton. 0.009 UNASSESSED UNASSESSED SUPPORTING Harvesting See Map for Boundaries. Central portion of LIS, Inner Estuary, (DISCONTINUOUS SEGMENT) SA LIS CB Inner - water of upper Hammonasset, Indian, Hammock Clinton Harbor Rivers, Dudley Creek and other small tributaries, (SA Inputs), from SA/SB water quality line, US to saltwater NOT Direct CT-C1_005 Clinton limits, Clinton.
  • Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)

    Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)

    VOLUME 2 OF 4 BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Bristol County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACUSHNET, TOWN OF 250048 ATTLEBORO, CITY OF 250049 BERKLEY, TOWN OF 250050 DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF 250051 DIGHTON, TOWN OF 250052 EASTON, TOWN OF 250053 FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF 250054 FALL RIVER, CITY OF 250055 FREETOWN, TOWN OF 250056 MANSFIELD, TOWN OF 250057 NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF 255216 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250059 NORTON, TOWN OF 250060 RAYNHAM, TOWN OF 250061 REHOBOTH, TOWN OF 250062 SEEKONK, TOWN OF 250063 SOMERSET, TOWN OF 255220 SWANSEA, TOWN OF 255221 TAUTON, CITY OF 250066 WESTPORT, TOWN OF 255224 REVISED JULY 16, 2014 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25005CV002B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE (shaded) B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
  • Town of North Branford

    Town of North Branford

    Town of North Branford Plan of Conservation and Development DRAFT FOR REVIEW June 20, 2019 Prepared for: The Town of North Branford Planning and Zoning Commission with assistance from Town of North Branford Planning and Zoning Commission Harry Dulak, Chair William Galdenzi, Vice Chair Ronald Siena Alexander DeFrancesco Trish Mase Stephen Scavo Plan of Conservation and Development Steering Committee Harry Dulak, Planning and Zoning Commission Carey Duques, AICP, Town Planner Michael Paulus, Town Manager Roger Salway, Economic Development Coordinator David Sargent, North Branford Land Conservation Trust Consultant Thank you to the South Central Regional Council of Governments (SCRCOG), who provided much of the mapping used in this Plan. Town of North Branford 2 Plan of Conservation and Development Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 2: Preserve and Protect the Town’s Agricultural Lands and Rural Character..........10 Chapter 3: Protect, Connect, and Enhance Open Spaces and Natural Areas ..........................17 Chapter 4: Provide Housing Choices that Meet the Town’s Demographic Needs ................31 Chapter 5: Grow the Tax Base in Areas with Existing Infrastructure ............................................40 Chapter 6: Maintain High Quality Town Facilities and Services ....................................................50 Chapter 7: Support a Safe, Appropriate, and Connected Transportation
  • Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches

    Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches

    to boating in Connecticut! TheWelcome map with local ordinances, state boat launches, pumpout facilities, and Boating Infrastructure Grant funded transient facilities is back again. New this year is an alphabetical list of state boat launches located on Connecticut lakes, ponds, and rivers listed by the waterbody name. If you’re exploring a familiar waterbody or starting a new adventure, be sure to have the proper safety equipment by checking the list on page 32 or requesting a Vessel Safety Check by boating staff (see page 14 for additional information). Reference Reference Reference Name Town Number Name Town Number Name Town Number Amos Lake Preston P12 Dog Pond Goshen G2 Lake Zoar Southbury S9 Anderson Pond North Stonington N23 Dooley Pond Middletown M11 Lantern Hill Ledyard L2 Avery Pond Preston P13 Eagleville Lake Coventry C23 Leonard Pond Kent K3 Babcock Pond Colchester C13 East River Guilford G26 Lieutenant River Old Lyme O3 Baldwin Bridge Old Saybrook O6 Four Mile River Old Lyme O1 Lighthouse Point New Haven N7 Ball Pond New Fairfield N4 Gardner Lake Salem S1 Little Pond Thompson T1 Bantam Lake Morris M19 Glasgo Pond Griswold G11 Long Pond North Stonington N27 Barn Island Stonington S17 Gorton Pond East Lyme E9 Mamanasco Lake Ridgefield R2 Bashan Lake East Haddam E1 Grand Street East Lyme E13 Mansfield Hollow Lake Mansfield M3 Batterson Park Pond New Britain N2 Great Island Old Lyme O2 Mashapaug Lake Union U3 Bayberry Lane Groton G14 Green Falls Reservoir Voluntown V5 Messerschmidt Pond Westbrook W10 Beach Pond Voluntown V3 Guilford