Quick Reference Guide - NZ Fleet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quick Reference Guide - NZ Fleet Quick Reference Guide - NZ Fleet What makes us so different? Customer Service GDS Booking Checklist It’s simple, we treat your drivers to the very best. 0800 866 327 Which includes: [email protected] Access Code = EP Booking Source = BS-IATA or TIDS • The newest rental vehicles available Billing / Account enquiries Contract ID (CD) = ICD-(CD #) • Highest specification of vehicles available in NZ [email protected] • A mix of European brands throughout the fleet Print your invoice at And what else? We do it all with a smile and solid www.europcar.co.nz Chargeback Acc SI = BA-(BA ACC #) promise of customer satisfaction. Make their day by treating your drivers to the Europcar experience. Emergency Breakdown 0800 625 035 Privilege/Ready= ID-(Privilege ID #) Passenger Vehicles Code Class Make Model Example People Large Description Bag ECMR Economy Toyota Yaris 4 1 3 door manual transmission CDAR Compact Holden Barina Auto 5 1 Economical vehicle for the budget-concious traveller IDAR Intermediate Holden Trax 5 2 Most popular rental category for general use SDAR Standard Hyundai Elantra 5 2 Great for open road travelling FDAR Full Size Holden Commodore SV6 5 2 Perfect touring vehicle, for 5 passengers/tall people Recreation Vehicles FWAR Full Size Wagon Holden Captiva 7 5 4 Large SUV IFAR Intermediate 4WD Toyota Rav4 5 4 Comfortable for 4 people + luggage or for snow/gravel roads SFAR Standard AWD Mitsubishi Outlander 5 4 Large vehicle with more boot space than the IFAR FFAR Large 4WD Toyota Highlander 7 4 Large, comfortable SUV for 5 people & luggage SZDR Bike Rack Wagon Mitsubishi Outlander 7 4 Avail AKL,CHC, ZQN. Roof mounted Thule racks for 2 bikes Premium Vehicles HCMR Economy Elite MINI Cooper 4 1 Manual transmission, 4 seater JDAR Premium Intermediate BMW 116 Hatch 5 2 Similar size to IDAR vehicle PDAR Premium Full size BMW 320d 5 2 Mid size luxurious sedan PFAR Premium 4WD Toyota Prado 5 4 Our largest prestigious 4WD wagon Vans and Commercial Vehicles PVAR Premium 8 Seater Van Hyundai i–Max 8 3 Comfortable 8 seater with good boot space XVAR 12 Seater Bus Toyota Hiace 12 6 Long wheel base model with large rear cargo space KPLW Commercial Cargo Van Toyota Hiace 3 Automatic with cargo barrier and reversing camera KPGS Double Cab Ute Ford Ranger 5 4x4 models all come with towbar, trayliners and canopies Enquiries: 0800 800 115 europcar.co.nz Chargeback reservations require both CD and BA numbers. MK2605 Quick Reference Guide - NZ Locations Auckland City Auckland Airport (International & Domestic) North Island Hamilton Airport Tauranga Cambridge Airport Tauranga City Rotorua New Plymouth Airport Airport Palmerston Napier Wellington Airport North Airport Airport & Ferry Terminal Picton Ferry Terminal Nelson Blenheim Airport (Marlborough) Airport Greymouth Railway Station Christchurch Hokitika Airport Airport Queenstown South Island Airport Invercargill Dunedin Airport Airport North Island Branches Loc Code Physical Address Auckland International Airport AKLT01 Auckland International Airport Terminal Auckland Domestic Airport AKLT01 Auckland Domestic Airport Terminal Auckland City AKLC01 73 Shortland St, Auckland Cambridge HLZS01 Unit 3, 8 Oliver Street Cambridge Hamilton Airport HLZT01 Hamilton Airport Terminal Privilege Loyalty Program Napier Airport NPET01 Hawkes Bay Airport Terminal Napier - Save time New Plymouth Airport NPLT01 New Plymouth Airport Terminal - Earn rewards Palmerston North Airport PMRT01 Palmerston North Airport Terminal - Sign up online Rotorua Airport ROTT01 Rotorua Airport Terminal Tauranga Airport TRGC01 Tauranga Airport (Meet & Greet) Ready loyalty program is Tauranga City TRGC01 107 Hewletts Rd, Tauranga (Pacific Auto Rentals) specifically designed for Wellington Airport WLGT01 Wellington Airport Terminal government renters. Wellinton Ferry WLGP01 Wellington Interislander Ferry Terminal Enquiries: 0800 800 115 South Island europcar.co.nz Branches Loc Code Physical Address Chargeback reservations require both CD and BA numbers. Blenheim Airport BHET01 Marlborough Airport Terminal (Meet and Greet) Christchurch Airport CHCT01 Christchurch Airport Terminal Dunedin Airport DUDT01 Dunedin Airport Terminal Greymouth GMNL01 Greymouth Railway Station Hokitika Airport HKKT01 Hokitika Airport Terminal (Meet and Greet) Invercargill Airport IVCT01 76 Clyde St or Invercargill Airport Terminal (Meet and Greet) Nelson Airport NSNT01 Nelson Airport Terminal (Meet and Greet) Picton Ferry PCNC01 Picton Interislander Ferry Terminal Queenstown Airport ZQNT01 Queenstown Airport Terminal MK2605.
Recommended publications
  • AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017
    AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE February 2017 ABOUT THE NEW ZEALAND AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION 2 FOREWORD 3 PART A: AIRPORT MASTER PLAN GUIDE 5 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 IMPORTANCE OF AIRPORTS 7 3 PURPOSE OF AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING 9 4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 13 5 BASIC PLANNING PROCESS 15 6 REGULATORY AND POLICY CONTEXT 20 7 CRITICAL AIRPORT PLANNING PARAMETERS 27 8 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT 46 9 KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN 50 10 CONCLUSION 56 PART B: AIRPORT MASTER PLAN TEMPLATE 57 1 INTRODUCTION 58 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 59 C O N T E S 3 AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 64 AIRPORT MASTER PLANNING GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE New Zealand Airports Association | February 2017 ABOUT THE NZ AIRPORTS ASSOCIATION The New Zealand Airports Association (NZ Airports) is the national industry voice for airports in New Zealand. It is a not-for-profit organisation whose members operate 37 airports that span the country and enable the essential air transport links between each region of New Zealand and between New Zealand and the world. NZ Airports purpose is to: Facilitate co-operation, mutual assistance, information exchange and educational opportunities for Members Promote and advise Members on legislation, regulation and associated matters Provide timely information and analysis of all New Zealand and relevant international aviation developments and issues Provide a forum for discussion and decision on matters affecting the ownership and operation of airports and the aviation industry Disseminate advice in relation to the operation and maintenance of airport facilities Act as an advocate for airports and safe efficient aviation. Airport members1 range in size from a few thousand to 17 million passengers per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders Made to Identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) Reduced Heights Necessary to Meet 1997 OLS By
    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. A \ \~ 12009 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) and an application for enforcement orders under Section 316 of the Act BETWEEN ROTORUA REGIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED (ENV-2009-AKL-304) Applicant GEOFFREY WAYNE FISCHER Respondent Hearing: At Rotorua on 1ih, 18th September 2009 Court: Environment Judge J A Smith Environment Commissioner PA Catchpole Enviromnent Commissioner CE Manning Appearances: Mr V Rive and Mr L U Hinchey for Rotorua Regional Airport Limited Mr G W Fischer for himself Date ofDecision: 9th November 2009 DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: Orders as sought refused. B: Orders made to identify Poplar (5339) and Fir (3021) reduced heights necessary to meet 1997 OLS by: [a] identifying current RL of top of both trees; 2 [b] identifying RL for ground level and 1997 OLS level for both trees; [cl identifying height of trees to remain and to be removed to comply with 1997 OLS. C: The Airport Company or its authorized agents who have received a copy of this decision may enter the site to undertake survey, measurements, and mark the two trees with the 1997 OLS level. Such access is to occur at reasonable times on notice to the owner and tenant. D: If agreement cannot be reached within 1 week of each tree being marked the court will convene a teleconference to discuss final or further orders or directions. E: Leave and costs are reserved. REASONS FOR DECISION Introduction [1] Rotorua Regional Airport Limited (the Airport Company) seeks enforcement orders against Mr G W Fischer, directing him to trim trees on his property at 628 Te Ngae Road, Rotorua.
    [Show full text]
  • Findings of the EPA National Investigation Into Firefighting Foams Containing PFOS
    Findings of the EPA national investigation into firefighting foams containing PFOS 4 APRIL 2019 Contents Executive Summary 5 Background 9 PFOS: International and New Zealand regulation 11 Strategy for the investigation 12 Resources 12 Scope of our role 12 Identifying where to investigate 14 Definition of the ‘use’ of foam 15 Definition of compliance 15 Our compliance approach 16 Enforcement actions available to us 16 Carrying out the investigation 18 Collection of evidence 18 Sites where the PFOS in firefighting foam was discovered 18 Observations 19 Compliance and enforcement 21 Outcome 22 Next steps 24 Compliance and enforcement 24 Review of regulatory tools 24 On prosecution 25 Conclusions 25 Appendix 1 Public interest and communications 27 Appendix 2 Sites included in the investigation 29 3 Investigation into firefighting foams containing PFOS | April 2019 4 Investigation into firefighting foams containing PFOS | April 2019 Executive Summary In December 2017, the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) began a national investigation into whether certain firefighting foams were present at airports and other locations in New Zealand. The foams under investigation contain a banned chemical, perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS). This report describes the outcome of this initiative. PFOS foams were restricted in New Zealand in 2006 when they were excluded from the Firefighting Chemicals Group Standard1, meaning PFOS-containing foams could no longer be imported into New Zealand, or be manufactured here. In 2011, an international decision that had recognised PFOS as a persistent organic pollutant2 was written into New Zealand domestic law3. This meant, in addition to the 2006 restriction, any existing products containing PFOS could no longer be used in New Zealand, and strict controls were set to manage their storage and disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013
    Border Report – Port of Tauranga and Rotorua Airport August 2013 Purpose A preliminary report to understand the level of risk the Port of Tauranga (POT) and Rotorua Airport present to the Bay of Plenty kiwifruit industry with the intent of determining if the current level of protection is adequate. Background Biosecurity in New Zealand consists of a multi –layer system that begins offshore with pre-border activities, incorporates the border and continues post-border into New Zealand where it becomes a joint effort between central government, regional councils, industry, community groups, and all New Zealanders, (a paper describing this system in more detail can be found on the KVH website www.kvh.org.nz/kiwifruit_biosecurity_risks). This paper will review a single layer, border interventions at ports of entry. Any port of entry has the potential to bring unwanted pests and diseases into New Zealand that could be detrimental to the kiwifruit industry, however, given the high concentration of the kiwifruit industry in the Bay of Plenty, this report has focused on the ports of entry in the immediate proximity to this region, which are the Port of Tauranga and the Rotorua Airport. The Port of Tauranga is New Zealand’s second largest port by container volume, and a major stop on the cruise ship circuit. Rotorua Airport is an International Airport receiving two trans-Tasman flights a week. Imports into POT, cruise ships, and passenger traffic through Rotorua Airport are all potential pathways for risk items to enter New Zealand and each will be reviewed to provide an overview of operations, potential risks that each present and how these risks are being mitigated.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Gazette Climatological Table
    _, ...._____ "'- ·-~·~- -- ·., ·-· No. 35 rt::: 7; :-: : ~/·~:D I 801 j' .;.,·1 ..C J t,;~: ';,,,,.·}'\. f:. r, r107,.}V,,.,.) 1' i t i I SUPPLEMENT TO 'IHE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE OF THURSDAY, 17 MARCH 1983 Published by Authority WELLINGTON: MONDAY, 21 MARCH 1983 CLIMATOLOGICAL TABLE FOR JANUARY 1983 802 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 35 NEW ZEALAND MEIBOROLOGICAL SERVICE CLIMATOLOGICAL TABLE-Summary of the Records of Temperature, Rainfall, and Sunshine for January 1983 Air Temperature in Degrees Celsius Rainfall in Millimetres He,tt Means of Absolute Maximum and Maximum Bright Station Station Mean Differ- Minimum No. Differ- Fall Sun- Above of A ence Total of encc shine M.S.L. and From Fall Rain From B Normal Date Date Days Normal Amount Date J!n. mum I ~-. I . --,. l=I. Metres C C C .C C C mm mm mm Hrs CapeReinga 191 21.6 14.7 18.2 +0.0 25.4 11 12.9 1 45 9 -16 21 19 Kaitaia Airport 80 22.9 13.5 18.2 -1.0 26.1 12 10.5 28 36 15 -43 11 12 274 Aupouri Forest 69 22.5 15.0 18.8 -0.6 26.5 12 10.6 1 32 9 -29 9 12 Kaitaia 8 23.2 12.2 17.7 26.0 12 8.7 27 30 7 12 12 Kerikeri M A F 79 24.6 12.2 18.4 30.2 11 9.6 2 18 9 9 12 Kerikeri Downs 79 24.8 12.6 18.7 30.2 11 10.4 3 20 7 9 12 Kerikeri Aerodrome 150 24.6 12.0 18.3 31.2 11 9.6 2 14 4 13 12 Umawera 9 .
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Productivity Commission on the Draft Report on Better Urban Planning
    SUBMISSION TO THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION ON THE DRAFT REPORT ON BETTER URBAN PLANNING 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 The New Zealand Airports Association ("NZ Airports") welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Productivity Commission's Draft Report on Better Urban Planning ("Draft Report"). 1.2 NZ Airports has submitted on the Resource Legislation Amendment Bill ("RLAB") and presented to the Select Committee on the RLAB, and has also submitted on the Proposed National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity ("NPS-UDC"). Our members have also been closely involved in extensive plan review processes in Auckland and Christchurch. Such participation is costly and time consuming - but necessary, given the important role the planning framework plays in our operations. 1.3 As discussed in our previous submissions, it is fundamental to the development of productive urban centres that residential and business growth does not hinder the effective current or future operation of New Zealand's airports. 1.4 In our view, the Draft Report does not adequately acknowledge the importance of significant infrastructure like airports in the context of urban planning and the need to effectively manage reverse sensitivity effects on such infrastructure. This is reflected in some of the Commission's recommendations which seek to limit notification and appeal rights and introduce the ability to amend zoning without using the Schedule 1 process in the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA"). NZ Airports has major concerns with such recommendations as they stand to significantly curtail the ability of infrastructure providers to be involved in planning processes and have their key concerns, such as reverse sensitivity effects, taken into account.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: New Zealand
    Case Study: New Zealand Background Because of its geographic location, its dependence on tourism, and the absence of a comprehensive rail network, New Zealand has developed a large international and national airports network over the years. Until 1966, almost all New Zealand important airports were developed by the State and remained under the central Government ownership and management. There are three main international airports. First, Auckland Airport is the busiest and the main international airport. It is the only airport serving the Auckland metropolitan area, which gathers a third of the country’s total population. Second, Wellington International Airport is also a major domestic hub serving mainly business and government. International flights at Wellington Airport are principally from/to Australia. Third, Christchurch International Airport is the major international airport in the South Island, where it acts as the main hub and attracts a significant share of New Zealand’s international tourist traffic. There are other international airports in New Zealand, such as Dunedin, Hamilton, Queenstown, and Palmerston North, which also get flights from other countries (mainly Australia). Other commercial airports serve domestic and regional traffic. Commercialization/privatization: Airports The commercialization of New Zealand’s airports started early. First, the 1961 Joint Airport Scheme established the principles that resulted in both central and local governments jointly owning and operating airport facilities. The objective of this policy was both to benefit from the expertise of local governments on regional economic needs and opportunities, and to make local government directly invest in airport infrastructure. In 1974, 24 airports throughout New Zealand were under a joint venture ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Brand Toolkit
    New Zealand New / 2019 The stories of VERSION 3.0 VERSION Regional Brand Toolkit VERSION 3.0 / 2019 Regional Brand Toolkit The stories of New Zealand Welcome to the third edition of the Regional Brand Toolkit At Air New Zealand I’m pleased to share with you the revised version our core purpose of the Regional Brand Toolkit featuring a number of updates to regions which have undergone a is to supercharge brand refresh, or which have made substantial New Zealand’s success changes to their brand proposition, positioning or right across our great direction over the last year. country – socially, environmentally and We play a key role in stimulating visitor demand, growing visitation to New Zealand year-round economically. This is and encouraging visitors to travel throughout the about making a positive country. It’s therefore important we communicate AIR NEW ZEALAND impact, creating each region’s brand consistently across all our sustainable growth communications channels. and contributing This toolkit has proven to be a valuable tool for to the success of – Air New Zealand’s marketing teams, providing TOOLKIT BRAND REGIONAL New Zealand’s goals. inspiring content and imagery which we use to highlight all the regions which make our beautiful country exceptional. We’re committed to showcasing the diversity of our regions and helping to share each region’s unique story. And we believe we’re well placed to do this through our international schedule timed to connect visitors onto our network of 20 domestic destinations. Thank you to the Regional Tourism Organisations for the content you have provided and for the ongoing work you’re doing to develop strong and distinctive brands for your regions.
    [Show full text]
  • TERRACE AIRSIDE AIRPORT + COVID-19 So Much More Than Just Your Read About How Rotorua Airport Average Airport Café-Style Turned a Difficult Situation Into Some- Food
    R OTORUA AIRPORT LIMITED NEWSLETTER I SPRING 2020 | ISSUE 02 TERRACE AIRSIDE AIRPORT + COVID-19 So much more than just your Read about how Rotorua Airport average airport café-style turned a difficult situation into some- food. Be WOW’d by Terrace thing pretty special as an essential Airside’s offerings. service for the BOP Community. HAERE MAI | ROTORUA AIRPORT | SPRING 2020 | PAGE 1 During a strategy meeting in July we took a short break to head to Mokoia Island to learn about its history and cultural significance. Quick ride out to Mokoia Leaning about the history and significance of Mokoia Mokoia thermal pools Rotorua Airport team with guide Jason Tamaki Keep up-to-date with what’s happening at Rotorua Airport... [email protected] www.facebook.com/RotoruaAirport/ Phone 07 345 8800 State Highway 30, Rotorua, New Zealand www.linkedin.com/company/rotorua-airport Open Hours 5.30am - 9.15pm. Seven days a week HAERE MAI | ROTORUA AIRPORT | SPRING 2020 | PAGE 2 Kia ora and welcome to the second edition of our airport newsletter, Haere Mai. MARK GIBB, CHIEF EXECUTIVE We launched our first newsletter earlier this year and have received really positive feedback from our community. We very much hope you enjoy Issue 02 of Haere Mai. 2020 has been a very challenging year for all of us. Back in February we were looking towards a record 12 months for passenger movements. By April the impacts of COVID-19 were becoming clear and our schedules had effectively shut down Dawn blessing of new terminal in May domestic travel for anyone other than essential workers.
    [Show full text]
  • R/17/5/11122
    R/17/5/11122 Quality Assurance Statement: Quality Assurance Statement Version 2 December 2017 Southland District Status Draft Council Project Manager: 15 Forth Street Prepared by: AMP Trudy Saunders, Contracts Administrator Invercargill 9840 Author Telephone 0800 Reviewed by: Evan Pearce, Airport Manager 732 732 Approved for issue Council (27 February 2018) Fax: 0800 732 329 by: Te Anau Airport Manapouri AMP 2018-2048 Page i R/17/5/11122 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Purpose of this Plan ................................................................................................ 5 2. Activity Description ........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 What We Do ............................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Why We Do It .......................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Objectives of the Te Anau Manapouri Airport Activity ............................................ 6 2.4 Overview of Management ....................................................................................... 6 2.4.1 Service Delivery Review ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Climate and Weather of Southland
    THE CLIMATE AND WEATHER OF SOUTHLAND 2nd edition G.R. Macara © 2013. All rights reserved. The copyright for this report, and for the data, maps, figures and other information (hereafter collectively referred to as “data”) contained in it, is held by NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. While NIWA uses all reasonable endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the data, NIWA does not guarantee or make any representation or warranty (express or implied) regarding the accuracy or completeness of the data, the use to which the data may be put or the results to be obtained from the use of the data. Accordingly, NIWA expressly disclaims all legal liability whatsoever arising from, or connected to, the use of, reference to, reliance on or possession of the data or the existence of errors therein. NIWA recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to their use of the data and that they obtain independent professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances. NIWA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SERIES NUMBER 63 ISSN 1173-0382 Note to Second Edition This publication replaces the first edition of New Zealand Meteorological Service Miscellaneous Publication 115 (15), written in 1984 by J. Sansom. It was considered necessary to update the first edition, incorporating more recent data and updated methods of climatological variable calculation. THE CLIMATE AND WEATHER OF SOUTHLAND 2nd edition G. R. Macara CONTENTS SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 7 TYPICAL
    [Show full text]
  • Osborne Evidence
    IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of Proposed Plan Change 19 (Frankton Flats Special Zone B) to the Queenstown Lakes District Plan. STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF GREGORY JOHN OSBORNE INTRODUCTION 1. My full name is Gregory John Osborne. I am a Director of Osborne Hay (South) Limited, a Planning and Resource Management Consultancy practice based in Auckland. 2. I have the qualification of Bachelor of Town Planning obtained from Auckland University in 1979 and I have been a full member of the New Zealand Planning Institute since 1984. 3. I have worked as a planner in local government and private practice since 1979 and during that period I have had extensive experience in district and regional plan preparation and the preparation and processing of resource consent applications and notices of requirement for designations. 4. In recent years I have also developed significant experience in resource management and planning processes related to the District Plan controls on aircraft noise and related land use controls on activities sensitive to aircraft noise in the vicinity of airports. 5. In particular, I facilitated the mediated settlement of a range of appeals on behalf of Manukau City Council in relation to the provisions of the Manukau District Plan relating to Auckland International Airport. That work involved drafting district plan rules which ultimately formed the basis of the Environment Court consent order. 1 6. Subsequently, I have provided planning advice to Auckland International Airport Limited over a number of years and I gave evidence to the Environment Court in the case Independent News Auckland Limited and Auckland International Airport Limited v Manukau City Council1 in which the key issue was reverse sensitivity to aircraft noise.
    [Show full text]