Tunny (SSN-682)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
United States Navy (USN) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Request Logs, 2009-2017
Description of document: United States Navy (USN) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) request logs, 2009-2017 Requested date: 12-July-2017 Release date: 12-October-2017 Posted date: 03-February-2020 Source of document: Department of the Navy - Office of the Chief of Naval Operations FOIA/Privacy Act Program Office/Service Center ATTN: DNS 36 2000 Navy Pentagon Washington DC 20350-2000 Email:: [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site, and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20350-2000 5720 Ser DNS-36RH/17U105357 October 12, 2017 Sent via email to= This is reference to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated July 12, 2017. -
Investigation of Abandoned WW II Wrecks in Palau
Investigation of Abandoned WW II Wrecks in Palau Tomo Ishimura1 Abstract Over forty Japanese vessels were sunken in the water of Palau during WWII. Some wrecks sunk in the shallow water at a depth of 20 meters or less and were salvaged. Other wrecks at 30 meters depth or more still remain and are legally protected by the authority of Palau Government but are seriously threatened by illegal treasure hunters. Initial efforts to identify human remains of Japanese soldiers were made in 2005. As part of an archaeology advisory team for the Japanese Government I carried out underwater surveys of sunken WWII vessels in Palau. In 2010 and 2011, I conducted investigations of the WWII vessels again, together with on-shore research on sites and features associated with the Japanese occupation period, funded by the Takanashi Foundation for Arts and Archaeology (Japan). The research revealed that the most of the vessels sunken in Palau were not genuine military vessels of Japanese Imperial Navy or Army but converted vessels originally built for non-combat purposes. These vessels were slow in speed and not well-equipped for combat activity. Most of them were destroyed by American aerial bombing on March 30th 1944. The evening before (March 29th) the main force of the Japanese Combined Fleet, including its flagship Musashi, retreated from Palau. It is clear that the vessels left in Palau were abandoned as a “third wheel” of the Combined Fleet. These abandoned-converted vessels include cargo carriers, tankers, whaling boats and fishing boats. This implies that Japanese troops were experiencing a difficult and desperate campaign at that time. -
November 2010 Perch Base, USSVI Volume 16 - Issue 11 Phoenix, Arizona
THE MONTHLY NEWSLEttER OF November 2010 PERCH BASE, USSVI Volume 16 - Issue 11 PHOENIX, ARIZONA What’s “Below Decks” in the HE REED GuiDES OUR EFFORts AS ERCH ASE MidWatch T USSVI C P B . ITEM Page # SEE THE NEXT PAGE FOR THE FULL TEXT OF OUR CREED. Full Text of the: 2 USSVI Creed Perch Base Foundation 3 Support Members Base Officers - Sailing 4 Orders Annual Veterans Day Pa- 5 rade Announcement Our Generous Sponsors 6 October 2010 - Perch Base 7 Meeting Minutes “From the Wardroom” 10 Base Commander’s mes- sage A Message from the Mem- 10 bership Chairman Chaplain’s Column 11 Binnacle List 12 Perch Base November 13 LEST WE FORGET THOSE STIll ON PATROL Birthdays What’s New Online 13 NOVEMBER ETERNAL PATROLS Shipmate-to-Shipmate 14 This Ain’t No S**t USS CORVINA (SS-226) 4 Nov 1943 82 Lost Perch Base “Octoberfest” 15 Japanese Submarine Attack off Truk “A Thank-you Note . .” 16 USS ALBACORE (SS-218) 07 Nov 1944 86 Lost Holland Club Members 17 Boats Selected for First Possible Japanese Mine between Honshu and Hokkaido, Japan 19 Female Submariners USS GROWLER (SS-215) 08 Nov 1944 85 Lost Lost Boat: 20 USS Scamp (SS-277) Possible Japanese Surface Attack in South China Sea Russian Navy’s Rocket 23 USS SCAMP (SS-277) 11 Nov 1944 83 Lost Torpedo Mailing Page 20 Japanese Surface Attack in Tokyo Bay area NEXT REGULAR MEETING USS SCULPIN (SS-191) 19 Nov 1943 12 Lost (51 POWS) 12 noon, Saturday, Nov. 13, 2010 Japanese Surface Attack off Truk American Legion Post #105 3534 W. -
Gato Class Boats Finished the War with a Mod 3A Fairwater
A VISUAL GUIDE TO THE U.S. FLEET SUBMARINES PART ONE: GATO CLASS (WITH A TAMBOR/GAR CLASS POSTSCRIPT) 1941-1945 (3rd Edition, 2019) BY DAVID L. JOHNSTON © 2019 The Gato class submarines of the United States Navy in World War II proved to be the leading weapon in the strategic war against the Japanese merchant marine and were also a solid leg of the triad that included their surface and air brethren in the USN’s tactical efforts to destroy the Imperial Japanese Navy. Because of this they have achieved iconic status in the minds of historians. Ironically though, the advancing years since the war, the changing generations, and fading memories of the men that sailed them have led to a situation where photographs, an essential part of understanding history, have gone misidentified which in some cases have led historians to make egregious errors in their texts. A cursory review of photographs of the U.S. fleet submarines of World War II often leaves you with the impression that the boats were nearly identical in appearance. Indeed, the fleet boats from the Porpoise class all the way to the late war Tench class were all similar enough in appearance that it is easy to see how this impression is justified. However, a more detailed examination of the boats will reveal a bewildering array of differences, some of them quite distinct, that allows the separation of the boats into their respective classes. Ironically, the rapidly changing configuration of the boats’ appearances often makes it difficult to get down to a specific boat identification. -
The Strategic Missile Submarine Force and Apl's Role in Its Development
JOHNM. WATSON THE STRATEGIC MISSILE SUBMARINE FORCE AND APL'S ROLE IN ITS DEVELOPMENT The U.S. Navy's Fleet Ballistic Missile program is one of the largest, most successful weapons systems development programs in our country's history. In the thirty-seven-year span of this program, three generations of increasingly capable weapons systems (Polaris, Poseidon, and Trident) have been developed and deployed. Contributions to these systems have spawned three of the technical departments at the Applied Physics Laboratory: Space, Strategic Systems, and Submarine Technology. INTRODUCTION The U.S. Navy's Fleet Ballistic Missile (FBM) program, begun in 1955, is recognized today as the cornerstone of the U.S. nuclear strategic deterrent. The submarine launched ballistic missile (SLBM) and its nuclear-powered submarine launching platform, the SSBN (submersible ship, ballistic, nuclear), provide a mobile, stealthy, long patrol-duration weapon system with enormous retaliation potential. This system provides a significant deterrent advantage over land-based missiles or aircraft systems because of its mobility and its ability to avoid detection in vast ocean patrol areas, thus remaining invulnerable to a surprise attack. The Navy's Strategic Systems Program (SSP), formerly the Special Projects Office (SPO) and the Strategic Systems Program Office (SSPO), has overseen the development and operational deployment of three generations of increasingly capable weapon systems (Po laris, Poseidon, and Trident), with six variants of the SLBM (Figs. 1 and 2). The success of this program is largely due Figure 1. A Trident II (D5) submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) is launched off the coast of Florida. The D-5 missile is the to the uniqueness of the sSP organization itself, the vision latest addition to the U.S. -
Regulus Missile Update
I NTEGRATED C ULTURAL R ESOURCES M ANAGEMENT P LAN REGULUS MISSILE HISTORIC CONTEXT ADDITION BRIEF CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS 1933 • Germany begins study into use of pilotless aircraft, yielding two prototypes, the V-1 and V-2 missiles. 1944 • In June 1944, the Germans initiate V-1 attacks on England. • U.S. Army engineers “reverse-engineer” and test-fly a copy of the V-1. • Production of American version of V-1 (designated JB-2) begins; 2,000 ordered. 1945 • In April, the Navy initiates testing of the JB-2 and designates it the KUW-1 “Loon”. • American production of JB-2 ends in August. 1946 • In June, the BuAer specifications were sent to 18 companies interested in pursuing missile and rocket technologies and willing to participate in a design competition at Edwards Air Force Base in California. 1947 • In February, the first submarine launch of a Loon takes place. • In May, the Air Force awarded Martin a contract for its tur- bojet-powered, subsonic Matador missile. The Navy saw this action as a threat to its guided missile program and asked BuAer to speed up the selection process in its design compe- tition. • In August, BuAer selected Chance Vought Aircraft and its Regulus missile as the Navy’s first guided missile manufac- turing program because of its affordability, recoverability, and ability to be launched from land, surface vessels, and submarines. 1948 • On 17 December, Vought delivered 10 production models to the Navy that were immediately tested at Edwards Air Force Base. NAVAL WEAPONS INDUSTRIAL RESERVE PLANT DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PAGE 8-91 I NTEGRATED C ULTURAL R ESOURCES M ANAGEMENT P LAN 1949 • Due to budgetary constraints, the Department of Defense was forced to consolidate funding into one guided missile pro- gram. -
June 2011 WWW
THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER OF PERCH BASE, USSVI, PHOENIX, ARIZONA June 2011 WWW . PERCH - BASE . ORG Volume 17 - Issue 6 THE USSVI CREED GUIDES OUR EFFORTS AS PERCH BASE. SEE PAGE FOUR FOR THE FULL TEXT OF OUR CREED. BEFORE POLARIS, . EATURED POSIDEN AND F MONTH THIS TRIDENT . The Navy’s fi rst strategic nuclear patrols. Page 21. What Else is “Below Decks” in the MidWatch Article Page Number Title and “What’s Below Decks”..................................................1 Less We Forget - Boats on Eternal Patrol..................................2 USSVI Creed - Our Purpose......................................................4 Perch Base Foundation Supporters...........................................4 Perch Base Offi cers....................................................................5 Sailing Orders (What’s happening with the Base)......................5 Special Notice to Members (Dillon’s Menu)...........................6 From the Wardroom - Base Commander’s Message..................7 Meeting Minutes - May 2011.......................................................7 “That’s Odd #1”...........................................................................9 Chaplain’s Column.....................................................................10 “Binnacle List”.............................................................................10 Our Holland Club Members........................................................11 “That’s Odd #2”...........................................................................11 June Base Member Birthdays................................................... -
CONFIDENTIAL - Unclassified Upon Removal of Enclosure (1)
--~y----------------------------------------------------------~---------------------- CO i"~ Fl 0ENTIAL DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL HISTORICAL CENTER COMMANDER SUBMARINE FORCE DECLASSIFIED IA&W UNITED STATES PACIFIC FLEET PEARL HARBOR. HI 9686(}-6550 E.O. 1295~~ . ~;:'.a~~~_@ '. " 5760 Ser OOPI/e' '30 .l 12 JUL 1993 CONFIDENTIAL - Unclassified upon removal of enclosure (1) From: Commander Submarine Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet To: Director of Naval History (OP-09B9) Subj: COMMAND HISTORY FOR 1992 (OPNAV Report 5750-1) Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 5750.12C Encl: (1) 1992 COMSUBPAC Command History (2) Biography and photograph of RADM Henry C. McKinney, J FIt. -J-..•• - USN, COMSUBPAC [ 8, c'j r;-.Ji~-:-JJ~,. ..:r, //_'/":;" -J.:-;;Y-l.,. -.-/ 1. Enclosure (1) is forwarded in accordance with reference (a). Copy to: CINCPACFLT /.-', t • / .' CONFIDENTIAL · ., ----------_-~-(----=-~\;:-t----;;-\T\...------=,.......=----------- l..~,=,::J~ o€. CNFIDEN'rIAL 1992 COMSUBPAC COMMAND HISTORY SECTION I Mission I-I - - SECTION II Tactical Combat Systems 11-1 thru II-3 .. ') SECTION III Operations and Plans III-l thru III-7 SECTION IV Material and Logistics IV-l thru IV-4 SECTION V Supply and Financial Mgmt V-I thru V-7 SECTION VI Strategic Systems Division VI-l SECTION VII communications VII-l SECTION VIII Administrative and Personnel VIII-l thru VIII-2 t - .,.:.'\ I. (This page is UNCLASSIFIED) CLASSIFIED BY: OPNAVINST S5513.5A-37 DECLASSIFY ON: ORIGINATING AGENCY'S DETERMINATION REQUIRED ii DE@bpAiii5lFiED SECTION I MISSION l~ (U) The Commander of the Submarine Force U.S. Pacific Fleet is·the principal advisor to the Fleet Commander in Chief for submarine matters. Under his command are 47 submarines, including USS KAMEHAMEHA (SSBN 642) and USS ASHEVILLE (SSN 758) , which became operational assets of SUBPAC in July and September, respectively. -
Eternal Patrol
AMERICAN SUBMARINER2019 • Second Quarter • $6.00 LEST WE FORGET 10 APRIL 1963 22 MAY 1968 || 1 Second Quarter 2019 THE 2019 USSVI SUBMARINE CALENDAR 2019 United States Submarine Calendar UNITED STATES SUBMARINES Submarine Squadrons of the Atlantic Fleet Plan your next reunion in USS Nautilus become an important (SSN 571), national the firsthistoric nuclear landmark vessel, anchoring was a true a trailblazerpopular East and Coast record-breaker, submarine museum.serving the None Navy of 25 the years Force’s under “firsts,” COMSUBLANT however, hasbefore had retiring more impact to USS NAUTILUS (SSN 571) than the truly pioneering initial message sent by this very boat to COMSUBLANT in January of 1955: “UNDERWAY ON NUCLEAR POWER.” NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS! It is our purpose to perpetuate the memory of our shipmates who gave their lives in the pursuit of their duties while serving their country. That their dedication, deeds and supreme sacrifi ce be a constant source of motivation toward greater accomplishments. Pledge loyalty and patriotism to the United States of America and its Constitution. COMSUBLANT Commander, Submarine Force Atlantic (COMSUBLANT) is the Submarine Force U.S. Atlantic Fleet type commander under the United States Fleet Forces Command. The principal responsibility is to operate, maintain, train, and equip submarines. SUBMARINE REUNION PACKAGE COMSUBLANT also has additional duties as commander of NATO’s Allied Submarine Command and also Commander, • Full run of USS Razorback Naval Submarine Forces. Have your next reunion at USS • Experienced sub vets on-hand Dedicated to all U.S. submariners who manned January 2019 Razorback (SS-394), a 90-percent (Five Submarines and 318 men lost) • Group photo our U.S. -
A Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard A Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health i Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard A Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard October 2004 i Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Disclaimer Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). In addition, citations to Web sites do not constitute NIOSH endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore, NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these Web sites. Ordering Information To receive documents or other information about occupational safety and health topics, contact NIOSH at NIOSH—Publications Dissemination 4676 Columbia Parkway Cincinnati, Ohio 45226–1998 Telephone: 1–800–35–NIOSH (1–800–356–4675) Fax: 513–533–8573 E-mail: [email protected] or visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh HHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-104 ii Nested Case-Control Study of Leukemia and Ionizing Radiation at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Preface Ionizing radiation and its sources are used every day in medical, industrial and governmental facilities around the world. Although some health risks from ionizing radiation exposures are widely recognized, the association of these exposures to specific diseases, especially various types of cancer, remains uncertain. -
Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 2A: United States - Submarines
Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018 Part 2A: United States - Submarines Peter Lobner July 2018 1 Foreword In 2015, I compiled the first edition of this resource document to support a presentation I made in August 2015 to The Lyncean Group of San Diego (www.lynceans.org) commemorating the 60th anniversary of the world’s first “underway on nuclear power” by USS Nautilus on 17 January 1955. That presentation to the Lyncean Group, “60 years of Marine Nuclear Power: 1955 – 2015,” was my attempt to tell a complex story, starting from the early origins of the US Navy’s interest in marine nuclear propulsion in 1939, resetting the clock on 17 January 1955 with USS Nautilus’ historic first voyage, and then tracing the development and exploitation of marine nuclear power over the next 60 years in a remarkable variety of military and civilian vessels created by eight nations. In July 2018, I finished a complete update of the resource document and changed the title to, “Marine Nuclear Power: 1939 – 2018.” What you have here is Part 2A: United States - Submarines. The other parts are: Part 1: Introduction Part 2B: United States - Surface Ships Part 3A: Russia - Submarines Part 3B: Russia - Surface Ships & Non-propulsion Marine Nuclear Applications Part 4: Europe & Canada Part 5: China, India, Japan and Other Nations Part 6: Arctic Operations 2 Foreword This resource document was compiled from unclassified, open sources in the public domain. I acknowledge the great amount of work done by others who have published material in print or posted information on the internet pertaining to international marine nuclear propulsion programs, naval and civilian nuclear powered vessels, naval weapons systems, and other marine nuclear applications. -
Regulus America's First Sea-Borne Nuclear Deterrent
by Edward C. Whitman As the Cold War intensified in the decade following World War II, and particularly with the Soviet Union’s success in matching the United States in developing atomic weapons, Regulus Roars. The nuclear- nuclear deterrence became a key element of global powered guided missile submarine USS Halibut (SSGN-587) sends a diplomacy. By the early 1950s, both superpowers had Regulus I missile skyward. The sleek,deployed large manned bomber forces capable of reaching turbojet-powered missile packed a nuclear warhead and had been each other’s homelands with either forward basing or aerial operational in the fleet since 1955. refueling, and additionally, the United States had begun to In the background is the aircraft carrier USS Lexington (CV-16). deploy atomic weapons on aircraft carriers. Both sides were also quick to take advantage of captured German V-1 and V-2 technology from World War II to begin development of both guided and ballistic missiles for tactical and strategic use, with the U.S. Army initially taking the lead in the United States. Not to be out-done, the U.S. Navy converted two World War II fleet boats, USS Carbonero (SS-337) and USS Cusk (SS-348) to carry a U.S. variant of the German V-1 pulse-jet missile, known as the Loon, first launched at sea in February 1947. Loon’s nominal range under command guidance was approximately 50 nautical miles, but using a second submarine as a relay, it could be effective out to 135 nautical miles, with a reported Circular Error Probable (CEP) of 6,000 yards.