Character Appraisal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Character Appraisal Main Heading Aston Tirrold & Aston Upthorpe Conservation Area Character Appraisal The conservation area character appraisal - this sets the context for the proposals contained in Part 2. Part 1 was adopted by Council in September and is included for information only. May 2005 Aston Tirrold and Aston Upthorpe Conservation Area Character Appraisal The Council first published the Aston Tirrold and Aston Upthorpe Conservation Area Character Appraisal in draft form in July 2004. Following th a period of public consultation, including a public meeting held on 12 nd August 2004, the Council approved the Character Appraisal on the 2 September 2004. Contents Introduction . .1 1 Aston Tirrold and Aston Upthorpe The history of the area . .3 Introduction . .3 Aston Tirrold . .3 Aston Upthorpe . .5 Aston Tirrold and Upthorpe from the nineteenth century . .6 2 The established character . .7 Chalk Hill . .9 Aston Street . .9 Baker Street . .12 Spring Lane . .14 The Croft . .16 Fullers Road . .16 Thorpe Street . .19 Important open spaces outside the conservation area . .21 3 Possible areas for enhancement and design guidance for new development . .22 Introduction . .22 The need for contextual design . .22 Grain of the village . .22 Appearance, materials and detailing . .22 Boundary treatments . .23 Scale . .24 Extensions to existing buildings . .24 Repairs . .24 Negative elements . .24 Services . .24 Street furniture . .25 4 South Oxfordshire Local Plan adopted by Council, April 1997 . .26 5 Summary of the conservation policies contained within the 2011 Second Deposit Draft local Plan . .28 6 Acknowledgements and bibliography . .31 ASTON TIRROLD & ASTON UPTHORPE CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL i South Oxfordshire District Council ii ASTON TIRROLD & ASTON UPTHORPE CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL South Oxfordshire District Council Part 1 Introduction 2. The Established Character The 1990 Planning (Listed Buildings This is an assessment of the existing and Conservation Areas) Act places a character, including the topography of duty on every local planning authority the area, the vernacular style, to determine which parts of their area predominant building materials and are areas of special architectural or natural or man-made features of local historic interest, the character or interest. appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance. The Act also 3. Possible Areas for states that the local planning authority Enhancement should, from time to time, formulate This includes areas with potential for and publish proposals for the development and improvement and preservation and enhancement of advice on extensions and repairs to these Conservation Areas. existing buildings. This document is an appraisal of the Aston Upthorpe and Aston Tirrold 4. Existing Conservation Policies Conservation Area to give an overview These are extracts from the 1997 of the established character to be Adopted South Oxfordshire Local Plan preserved and to identify possible and the 2011 Second Deposit Draft areas for future enhancement. It is South Oxfordshire Local Plan intended to assist in defining what is of identifying policies relating to listed special architectural or historic buildings and Conservation Areas. importance, what should be protected and to give guidance as to the form, 5. Plan of the Conservation Area style and location of future change and This is a scale plan of the area, which development. aims to identify the elements, which The appraisal also includes a review of contribute to the character. The plan the boundaries of the conservation includes the Conservation Area area and possible extensions are boundary, listed buildings (buildings identified. Any extension to the identified by the Department of Culture, conservation area will be subject to a Media and Sport as being of special separate consultation exercise. architectural or historic interest), former The document is divided into various Grade III listed buildings (a now sections as follows: obsolete category but where the buildings may still be of architectural or 1. The History of the Area historic interest) and other buildings of local note. This latter group consists of This covers the period from prehistory buildings that play a part in establishing to the present day. It includes the character of the street scene but significant architectural history, have not yet been considered to be of important dates and references to sufficient importance to meet the people and events that have helped to current criteria for listing. Government shape the area we see today. guidance contained in PPG.15- Planning and the Historic Environment indicates, however, that there is a presumption against the ASTON TIRROLD & ASTON UPTHORPE CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL 1 South Oxfordshire District Council demolition of such buildings. Important trees are also identified. These are usually highly visible from public places and/or they contribute to the setting of a listed building. Important open spaces are identified, as these are a vital element in the character of an area. Character is defined not just by buildings, walls and trees, but also by the spaces between them. These contribute to the setting of buildings. They allow views around the area and they are often an important element in the historical development of a settlement. Important unlisted walls are identified. These are usually built of local materials and help to define spaces and frame views. Lastly, important views into, out of and around the Conservation Area are identified. It should be appreciated that a Conservation Area's character does not end with a line drawn on a map. Often the character is closely associated with attractive views out to surrounding countryside, sometimes via gaps between buildings. Views within an area such as that to a church or particularly attractive group of buildings are also important. 6. Archaeological Constraint Plan The character and history of an area are closely linked to its archaeological remains. This plan identifies the location of ancient monuments, earthworks and known crop marks, find spots, archaeological sites and linear works identified on the Sites and Monuments Record maintained by Oxfordshire County Council. 2 ASTON TIRROLD & ASTON UPTHORPE CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL South Oxfordshire District Council 1. Aston Tirrold and Aston The Astons are surrounded by fertile 1 Berks VCH, vol 3 farming land, the soil is loam and lies Upthorpe - the History 2 Morris, 1979 of the Area partly on the Upper Greensand and partly on the chalk of the downs. There Introduction is archaeological evidence for sporadic prehistoric occupation of the slopes of The villages are sited at a spring line. Blewburton Hill and Lowbury Hill and There are many springs which arise several ancient roadways traverse the within and close to the villages, and Parishes. The archaeological record for probably these were the reason for the Blewburton Hill suggests that it was original building of a settlement at this used in both the Romano-British and location, as with the other spring-line the Anglo-Saxon periods. In the gravel villages between here and Wantage, pits ¾ mile north of the village on the and beyond. The Astons are the most South Moreton Road there have been eastern of this string of spring-line frequent finds of Roman pottery and villages, before reaching the Goring human remains. Local tradition holds Gap at Streatley. that the battle of Ashdown in 871, Domesday Book identifies only one where King Ethelred and Alfred village, called ‘Estone’ with two land defeated the Danes could have taken holdes. It only later came to be place within the locality. identified as two separate parishes. Until the nineteenth century the two Aston Tirrold settlements appear to have been more Documentary evidence describes how distinct than they are today. Although the control of land in the parishes infilling between the two villages changed hands over time. Pre- probably took place over a Conquest records for the manor of considerable period before the Aston Tirrold show it was assessed at nineteenth century. Aston Upthorpe to 15 hides and name the wife of Lanc as the west and north of Fullers Road holding the land 1. Domesday Book (which still defines the parish boundary) notes that the Count of Montain also lies beneath the wooded slopes of held land in Aston Tirrold (which were Blewburton Hill with buildings bordering held by Arkell before 1066) and that Thorpe Street, Fullers Road and Spring the land is held from him by the Abbey Lane whereas in Aston Tirrold, the of Preaux 2. In 1086 the manor was settlement was associated with St. under the king's control and was Michael's Church and buildings along controlled by successive Earls of Aston Street and Rectory Lane. The Warwick until at least 1446 when, with more recent houses to the south east the death of Anne Beauchamp (c.1448) of Baker Street now link the buildings to ownership passed to the crown 2. the north west of Baker Street with Aston Tirrold probably owes its name those further to the south along Baker to Nicholas, or his son Geoffrey, Torrold Street that would historically have been de Aston who were both immediate more easily distinguishable as Aston tenants under the Earls of Warwick in Tirrold. Modern development has the twelfth century. The manor of Aston largely taken place on the outskirts of Tirrold then passed through various the village, although modern houses ownerships in the fifteenth and also fill gaps along the streets and sixteenth centuries. In 1577 Thomas lanes in the village itself. ASTON TIRROLD & ASTON UPTHORPE CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL 3 South Oxfordshire District Council 1 Berks VCH, vol 3 Stampe bought both manors from John century screens from elsewhere in the Yate, and was succeeded by his sons2. church 2. The transept roof is original. 2 Whitwell, 1984 From 1649 the Hatton and then the Over the chancel arch is a truss with a 3 Wordie, 2000 Fuller families controlled the estate.
Recommended publications
  • Settlement Hierarchy and Social Change in Southern Britain in the Iron Age
    SETTLEMENT HIERARCHY AND SOCIAL CHANGE IN SOUTHERN BRITAIN IN THE IRON AGE BARRY CUNLIFFE The paper explores aspects of the social and economie development of southern Britain in the pre-Roman Iron Age. A distinct territoriality can be recognized in some areas extending over many centuries. A major distinction can be made between the Central Southern area, dominated by strongly defended hillforts, and the Eastern area where hillforts are rare. It is argued that these contrasts, which reflect differences in socio-economic structure, may have been caused by population pressures in the centre south. Contrasts with north western Europe are noted and reference is made to further changes caused by the advance of Rome. Introduction North western zone The last two decades has seen an intensification Northern zone in the study of the Iron Age in southern Britain. South western zone Until the early 1960s most excavation effort had been focussed on the chaiklands of Wessex, but Central southern zone recent programmes of fieid-wori< and excava­ Eastern zone tion in the South Midlands (in particuiar Oxfordshire and Northamptonshire) and in East Angiia (the Fen margin and Essex) have begun to redress the Wessex-centred balance of our discussions while at the same time emphasizing the social and economie difference between eastern England (broadly the tcrritory depen- dent upon the rivers tlowing into the southern part of the North Sea) and the central southern are which surrounds it (i.e. Wessex, the Cots- wolds and the Welsh Borderland. It is upon these two broad regions that our discussions below wil! be centred.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Landscape Character Areas and Their Special Qualities and Features of Significance
    Historic Landscape Character Areas and their special qualities and features of significance Volume 1 Third Edition March 2016 Wyvern Heritage and Landscape Consultancy Emma Rouse, Wyvern Heritage and Landscape Consultancy www.wyvernheritage.co.uk – [email protected] – 01747 870810 March 2016 – Third Edition Summary The North Wessex Downs AONB is one of the most attractive and fascinating landscapes of England and Wales. Its beauty is the result of many centuries of human influence on the countryside and the daily interaction of people with nature. The history of these outstanding landscapes is fundamental to its present‐day appearance and to the importance which society accords it. If these essential qualities are to be retained in the future, as the countryside continues to evolve, it is vital that the heritage of the AONB is understood and valued by those charged with its care and management, and is enjoyed and celebrated by local communities. The North Wessex Downs is an ancient landscape. The archaeology is immensely rich, with many of its monuments ranking among the most impressive in Europe. However, the past is etched in every facet of the landscape – in the fields and woods, tracks and lanes, villages and hamlets – and plays a major part in defining its present‐day character. Despite the importance of individual archaeological and historic sites, the complex story of the North Wessex Downs cannot be fully appreciated without a complementary awareness of the character of the wider historic landscape, its time depth and settlement evolution. This wider character can be broken down into its constituent parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Bronze Age and Iron Age Resource Assessment
    SOLENT THAMES RESEARCH FRAMEWORK RESOURCE ASSESSMENT THE LATER BRONZE AGE AND IRON AGE PERIOD George Lambrick May 2010 (County contributions by David Allen, Tim Allen, Steve Ford, Sandy Kidd and Ruth Waller; palaeoenvironmental contribution by Mike Allen) Background Studies carried out for the Solent Thames Research Framework The study for Buckinghamshire was written by Sandy Kidd; Oxfordshire by Tim Allen; Berkshire by Steve Ford; Hampshire by Dave Allen; and Isle of Wight by Ruth Waller. Environmental background was supplied by Michael Allen. Regional and national research context There have been various previous reviews of different aspects of late prehistory in the area, and various conferences have outlined key research issues. Some are now becoming quite elderly but are still useful despite no longer being fully up to date, and they all vary in geographical scope, and few span the full period covered here (cf Barrett and Bradley 1980; Brück 2001; Cunliffe and Miles 1984; Fitzpatrick and Morris 1994; Champion and Collis 1996; Haselgrove and Pope 2007; Haselgrove and Moore 2007; Lambrick with Robinson 2009). Understanding the British Iron Age an Agenda for Action (Haselgrove et al. 2000) is the most recent attempt at a national research framework for the latter half of the period. Nature of evidence base General Scale and Character of investigations The way in which later prehistoric sites and finds are recorded in county Historic Environment or Sites and Monuments Records is rather variable and not always easy to extract, so the following figures give only a broad brush indication of the scale of the known resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Adkins, L, and Needham, S, 1985 New research on a late Bronze Age enclosure at Queen Mary’s Hospital, Carshalton, Surrey Archaeol Collect 76 , 11-50 Allen, T, 1981 Hardwick with Yelford: Smith’s Field, South Midlands Archaeology 11 , 124-7 Allen, T G, 1990 An Iron Age and Romano-British enclosed settlement at Watkins Farm, Northmoor, Oxon , Thames Valley Landscapes, The Windrush Valley, Vol. 1, Oxford Univ. Committee for Archaeology, Oxford. Allen, T G, in prep Excavations in the Vineyard, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: the Iron Age and Roman evidence, Oxford Archaeology Allen, T G, Hayden, C, and Lamdin-Whymark, H, 2008 From Bronze Age enclosure to Saxon settlement: new light on Taplow Hillfort, Buckinghamshire. Archaeological excavations from 1999-2005 , Oxford Archaeology Thames Valley monograph ?? Allen, T, and Lamdin-Whymark, H, 2005 Little Wittenham, Excavations at and around Castle Hill, South Midlands Archaeology 35 , 69-82 Allen, T G, and Robinson, M A, 1993 The prehistoric landscape and Iron Age enclosed settlement at Mingies Ditch, Hardwick-with-Yelford, Oxon., Thames Valley Landscapes: The Windrush Valley vol. 2, Oxford Univ. Committee for Archaeology, Oxford Anderson, D E, Goudie, A S, and Parker, A G, 2007 Global Environments through the Quaternary , Oxford University Press, Oxford Andersen, S Th, 1973 The differential pollen productivity of trees and its significance for the interpretation of a pollen diagram from a forested region. In: Birks, H.J.B. and West, R.G. (eds.) Quaternary Plant Ecology , Blackwell, Oxford,
    [Show full text]
  • Harding Hillforts Lang Review Final
    The Prehistoric Society Book Reviews IRON AGE HILLFORTS IN BRITAIN AND BEYOND BY DW HARDING Oxford University Press. 2012. 334pp, 69 illus, incl 16 col and 46 B/W plates. ISBN 978-0-19- 969534-9 hb, £75 For so long, perhaps too long, hillfort studies have been central to research and to our understanding of the British Iron Age. Ever since Christopher Hawkes produced his landmark Antiquity paper in 1931, hillforts have been endlessly discussed in various attempts to categorise, define and interpret their significance in later Prehistoric studies (for example Jesson and Hill 1971; Cunliffe 1975; Forde-Johnston 1976). As a result site reports, articles and books that have outlined, reviewed, analysed and re-interpreted hillforts have dominated Iron Age studies for much of the twentieth century. Thanks to developments in aerial and landscape surveys, widespread geophysical surveys and results from development-led archaeological fieldwork from the 1970s onwards, there has been a change in direction for Iron Age studies and these site types no longer dominate research for this period. Nevertheless, recent research has shed new light and new perspectives on hillforts (for example Champion and Collis 1996; Sharples 2010) and current work place these sites within a wider research framework. There remains no doubt that archaeologists remain obsessed with these sites; partly no doubt due to their dominant (earthwork) presence in the landscape and their size and scale: there’s nothing quite like scaling the monumental earthworks of Maiden Castle or Hambledon Hill (both in Dorset) to make you appreciate them! Perhaps also, these sites have clearly presented opportunities as the testing grounds for archaeologists, as many pre-eminent archaeologists have dug one (or two) in their day.
    [Show full text]
  • And Age-Related Changes in an Iron Age Horse Skeleton from Danebury Hillfort, Hampshire
    Archaeofauna 16 (2007): 73-84 Work- and age-related changes in an Iron Age horse skeleton from Danebury hillfort, Hampshire ROBIN BENDREY Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Winchester, West Hill, Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 4NR, UK. e-mail: [email protected] (Received November 4, 2005; Revised April 20, 2007; Accepted May 22, 2007) ABSTRACT: Pathological changes and other alterations in an Iron Age horse skeleton from Danebury, Hampshire, England are described and used to interpret the possible use of the ani- mal. The low level of pathology present in what is a relatively old animal (c.16-18 years of age at death) suggests that the horse was not heavily used, perhaps employed to pull a light cart or chariot or occasional riding. The presence of a horizontal fissure in the caudal epiphysis of the thoracic vertebra 14 may indicate that it was used for riding, possibly with either a pad saddle or bareback. KEYWORDS: HORSE, PALAEOPATHOLOGY, IRON AGE, DANEBURY, RIDING, TRACTION RESUMEN: El trabajo aborda los cambios patológicos y otro tipo de alteraciones detectados en un esqueleto de caballo de la Edad del Hierro recuperado en Danebury, Hampshire, Inglaterra y utiliza ello para interpretar los posibles usos del animal. El limitado grado de patología exis- tente en lo que parece ser un animal bastante viejo (entre 16-18 años de edad) sugiere que el caballo no fue utilizado de forma intensiva siendo su misión, posiblemente, la de tirar de un carro o carroza ligera o, incluso, ser montado de forma ocasional. La presencia de una fisura horizontal en la epífisis caudal de la vértebra torácica nº 14 podría indicar que se utilizó para la monta bien a pelo o con silla de montar.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Brochure
    O L D S A R U M C O T T A G E PRICE £1,100,000 A charming cottage in the most fantastic South Oxfordshire village ADDRESS Old Sarum Cottage Aston Upthorpe Didcot Oxfordshire, OX11 9EG L O CAL The Fat Frog in The Chequers, Aston Upthorpe The Bear Inn, North Moreton Blewburton Hill T O W NS Abingdon 10.0 miles & T RAI N S T AT I O NS Wallingford 4.0 miles Oxford 20.0 miles Didcot Parkway Station 4.0 miles London Paddington from 37 mins 5 1 . 7 9 5 0̊ N - 1 . 8 8 3 9̊ W A B O U T T H I S H O U S E G E N E R A L ______________________________________________ 5 SERVICES Mains water, electricity and BEDROOMS drainage Oil fired central heating ______________________________________________ LISTING Grade II 2 ______________________________________________ BATH/SHOWER ROOMS COUNCIL TAX Band G ______________________________________________ LOCAL South Oxfordshire 3 AUTHORITY District Council RECEPTION ROOMS H O U S E A N D G R O U N D S Tucked away in the picturesque Oxfordshire village of Aston Upthorpe lies this attractive family home. Old Sarum Cottage has a warm and inviting feel, with generously proportioned rooms - ideally suited for a family and those who enjoy entertaining. The cottage is bursting with charm with a number of features including exposed beams, low windows and attractive fireplaces. There is a choice of well proportioned reception rooms and the five bedroom, two bathroom layout makes for comfortable family living. At its heart, Old Sarum Cottage is an exceptional village house, with a well-appointed kitchen, with AGA and a useful utility room.
    [Show full text]
  • Later Prehistory from the Trent to the Tyne
    Durham E-Theses Later prehistory from the Trent to the Tyne Challis, A. J. How to cite: Challis, A. J. (1972) Later prehistory from the Trent to the Tyne, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7941/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk A. J. CHALLIS LATER PREHISTORY FROM THE TRENT TO THE TYME Ph.D. Thesis, September 1972 ABSTRACT OF THESIS The object of the thesis is to present a study of the later Bronze Age and Iron Age periods in the area from the river Tyne southwards to the English Midlands. A large quantity of unpublished material is illustrated, and is discussed in a suggested chronological sequence devised on the basis of site association and relevant British and European context. The evidence of settlement sites, economy, and burial is also reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wessex Hillforts Project
    Bibliography Ainsworth, S, Oswald, A and Pearson, T 2001 ‘Discovering Our FSA. Cambridge Hillfort Heritage’, PAST (The Newsletter of the Prehistoric Society), — 1998 Barbury ‘Castle: an Archaeological Survey by the Royal 39, November 2001, 3-4 Commission on the Historical Monuments of England’. RCHME Aitken, M J 1974 Physics and Archaeology, 2 edn. Oxford: Clarendon Survey Report, AI/3/1998 Press — (ed) 1999 Unravelling the Landscape, an Inquisitive Approach to Aitken. M J and Tite, M S 1962 ‘Proton magnetometer surveying on Archaeology. Stroud: Tempus some British hill-forts’, Archaeometry, 5, 126–34 — 2000 Liddington Castle Archaeological Earthwork Survey. English Alcock, L 1968a ‘Cadbury Castle’, 1967, Antiquity, 42, 47–51 Heritage survey report, AI/4/2001 — 1968b ‘Excavations at South Cadbury Castle, 1967, a summary Bowden, M 2005 ‘The Middle Iron Age on the Marlborough report’, Antiq J, 48, 6–17 Downs’, in Brown, G, Field, D and McOmish, D (eds) — 1969 ‘Excavations at South Cadbury Castle, 1968, a summary The Avebury Landscape – Aspects of the Field Archaeology of the report’, Antiq J, 49, 30–40 Marlborough Downs. Oxbow Books, Oxford, 156-63 — 1970 ‘South Cadbury Excavations, 1969’, Antiquity, 44, 46–9 Bowden, M, Ford, S and Gaffney, V 1993 ‘The excavation of a Late — 1971 ‘Excavations at South Cadbury Castle, 1970, summary Bronze Age artefact scatter on Weathercock Hill’, Berkshire report’, Antiq J, 51, 1–7 Archaeol J, 74, 69–83 — 1972 ‘By South Cadbury is that Camelot…’ Excavations at Cadbury Bowden, M and McOmish, D 1987 ‘The Required Barrier’, Scottish Castle 1966–1970. London Archaeol Rev, 4, 76–84 — 1980 ‘The Cadbury Castle sequence in the first millennium BC’, — 1989 ‘Little Boxes: more about hillforts’, Scottish Archaeol Rev, 6, Bull Board Celtic Stud, 28, 656–718 12–16 — 1995 Cadbury Castle, Somerset: the Early Medieval Archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wessex Hillforts Project
    THE WESSEX HILLFORTS PROJECT Index Page numbers in bold refer to entrances 98, 99, 136, 158 brooches 124 Cheviot Hills 8 illustrations. field system 99 Buckland Rings, Hampshire Childe, Gordon 4 magnetometer survey 86, 99, 21, 27–8 Chiselbury, Wiltshire 99, 112, 100, 101, 102–3, 144 Bury Hill, Hampshire 134, 136, 137, 139 A morphology and setting 98, comparison with Danebury Chiseldon 133 ABC chronological system 4–5 98–9, 133 145 Chisenbury Trendle, Wiltshire aerial photographic record 33 occupation 103, 118, 143, ditches 56 138 aerial photography 18, 38, 147, 159, 161 earthworks 55 Cissbury, Sussex 7, 13, 16, 44, 131, 133, 139–40, 153 previous finds 98, 99 entrances 54–5, 55 53 Alcock, Leslie 151 quarry scoops 103 excavation 32, 152 Cley Hill, Hampshire 134 Alfred’s Castle, Oxfordshire ramparts 98, 98–9, 103, 118, external enclosure 56 Codford Circle, Wiltshire 137 background 82–3 136, 138, 161 horse rearing 56 Conderton (or Dane’s) Camp, digital terrain modelling 85, topographical recording 37 magnetometer survey Worcestershire 16–17, 85, 89 trackway 102 27, 34, 35, 46, 56–8, 18, 34, 35, 127, 136, entrances 81, 87 barrows 120, 162 144, 147, 150 excavations 83–4, 86–8 Alfred’s Castle 82 morphology and setting 55, Coombe Down, Wiltshire 113 linear anomalies 86 Barbury Castle 103 55–6, 135 Credenhill, Welsh Marches 5 magnetometer survey 62, 83, bowl 127 occupation 13, 14, 56, 140, Crickley Hill, Gloucestershire 83–6, 84, 144, 155 disc 64, 99 143, 159, 162 5, 16, 44 morphology and setting 81, the Lambourne Seven 97 previous finds 55 Croft
    [Show full text]
  • The Wessex Hillforts Project
    1 Hillfort studies and the Wessex Project by Andrew Payne The Wessex Hillforts Project was initiated in effort and organisation must have been 1996 to answer a need for more wide-rang­ involved in their construction, the reasons ing data on hillfort interiors for the purposes why they were constructed are more difficult of placing their future management on a to comprehend. The term hillfort has been sounder footing and enhancing knowledge applied to many different types of site and of the internal character of the various hill- their varying sizes, morphologies and situa­ fort types represented in Wessex. It was tions strongly suggest a range of different hoped that the combined results of the pro­ motives for their construction, spanning a ject would considerably extend academic considerable date range (Fig 1.1). understanding of the socio-economic role of We usually associate hillforts with the hillforts in southern England during the 1st Iron Age, the period when many new hill- millennium BC, thereby allowing a greater forts were built, but the origins of hillfort level of interpretation to be offered to visi­ building lie at least as far back as the Bronze tors at those sites with public access. Age. During the 800 years before the The primary methodology employed by Roman invasion of Britain (the period that the project was geophysical survey supple­ we conventionally term the Iron Age) the mented by examination of aerial photo­ role of hillforts seems to have changed. New graphic evidence, documentary research and evidence is only gradually being uncovered selective digital modelling of site micro- that helps to extend our understanding and topography.
    [Show full text]
  • Aston Tirrold & Aston Upthorpe
    ASTON TIRROLD & ASTON UPTHORPE: HISTORY & WALKABOUT. THE ASTONS HISTORY GROUP This walkabout will help you explore the villages of Aston Upthorpe and Aston Tirrold, and give you an introduction to their history. It is dedicated to Stephen Whitwell, who carried out much original research into the villages’ history, and who published the first edition of this guide in the 1977. Subsequent contributing editors: Judy Barradell-Smith and Jancis Smith. © Copyright Astons History Group. (This edition 2019) A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO OUR VILLAGES (see page 12 for map with key locations). The twin villages of Aston Tirrold and Aston Upthorpe are “spring line” villages, where streams and springs emerge from the chalk water table of the Berkshire Downs and eventually join the Thames further downstream. These waters create rich agricultural land around our villages, which together with the shelter of Blewburton Hill to the west and the Downs to the south, provided an advantageous setting for our villages to develop and prosper. Aston Upthorpe The name Aston came from the Saxon word Estune, or Eastune, and means “to the east of” - while “Upthorpe” (also a Saxon word) means “higher settlement”. During the Saxon period we find Aston Upthorpe, the older of the two villages, under the Hundred of Reading while Aston Tirrold came under the Hundred of Moreton. A charter granted by King Edgar in 964 defined the boundaries of “Estune” as “10 mansae of land given to his wife Queen Elfthryth”, and the detailed description seems to match closely the modern parish boundaries. Aston Tirrold The name “Tirrold” is believed to derive from the Norman name “Thorold”.
    [Show full text]