DOCSLIB.ORG

European Robotics Research Institutions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
European Robotics Research Institutions ECHORD European Clearing House for Open Robotics Development European Robotics Research Institutions Technische Universität Università di Napoli Universidade de München Federico II Coimbra Preface The European funded ECHORD project “European Clearing House for Open Robotics Development” began in May 2009 with the ambitious goal of bringing together Europe’s robotics manufacturers with the excellent European research institutions. This has been hugely successful! ECHORD now comprises 53 universities and more than 80 industrial partners – the latter as partners within the experiments as well as suppliers of equipment. This was achieved by joint projects or “experiments” based on scenarios and research foci relevant to both the robot manufacturers and research institutions. Obviously, there have been and will continue to be many long-term effects and benefits to the industry as a whole, but also more unexpected successes like the fact that the ECHORD team managed to actively motivate hardware suppliers to display their offer in the European showcase of robotics, which now displays nearly 300 items. As part of our efforts to foster a “structured dialog” between academia and industry, we present here a new type of brochure on robotic research institutions from all over Europe. This document is based on information gathered from over 150 research institutions and will continuously be updated and expanded. By showcasing the wealth of European labs we hope to make it easier for the robotic industry to find research partners from academia and to trigger considerably more academia-industry collaborations. The resulting knowledge transfer will provide European industry as a whole with tangible and measurable results by accelerating the development of new enabling technologies and by the deployment of robotics technology into new applications. Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Alois Knoll PD Dr. rer. nat. Florian Röhrbein Dipl.-Psych. Laura Voss Technische Universität München Computer Science Department Robotics and Embedded Systems Table of Contents Preface �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1 Table of Contents � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3 Aix Marseille University / CNRS � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 14 Institute of Movement Sciences Department of Biorobotics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16 Faculty of Engineering Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Automation & Robotics Lab Bayreuth University � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 18 Institute for Computer Science Chair for Robotics and Embedded Systems BIBA - Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 20 Bielefeld University � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 22 Faculty of Technology Applied Informatics Group Bielefeld University � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 24 Faculty of Technology Neuroinformatics Group Bielefeld University � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 26 Center of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology (CITEC) Bielefeld University � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 28 Research Institute for Cognition and Robotics (CoR-Lab) Brest State Technical University �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 30 Faculty of Electronic Information Systems Department of Intelligent Information Technologies Robotics Lab Budapest University of Technology and Economics � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 32 Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics Department of Control Engineering and Information Technology Laboratory of Intelligent Robotics Bulgarian Academy of Sciences �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 34 Institute of Mechanics Laboratory of Control in Mechanics Bundeswehr University Munich �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ���� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 36 Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Intelligent Robots Laboratory Cognitive Systems Research Institute (CSRI) �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 38 Embodied Language Processing and Multisensory Cognition Group Collaborative Center for Applied Research on Service Robotics (ZAFH)� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 40 Danish Technological Institute� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 42 Robot Technology Delft University of Technology� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 44 Robotics Institute Democritus University of Thrace � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 46 Department of Production and Management Engineering Group of Robotics and Cognitive Systems DFKI - German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 48 Robotics Innovation Center 3 Dortmund University of Technology �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 50 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Production Systems École Centrale de Nantes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 52 Physics and Engineering Sciences Research Institute of Communications and Cybernetics of Nantes (IRCCyN) Robotics Team Engineering Institute of Coimbra (ISEC) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 54 RoboCorp ENSTA ParisTech �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 56 Department of Computer Science and System Engineering Robotics and Computer Vision Group ETH Zürich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology)� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 58 Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering (D-MAVT) Autonomous Systems Lab (ASL) ETH Zürich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology)� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 60 Faculty of Architecture Institute of Technology in Architecture Architecture and Digital Fabrication European Space Agency (ESA) �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ���� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 62 ESA Telerobotics & Haptics Laboratory fortiss� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 64 Cyber-Physical Systems Virtual Engineering & Robotics Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems (IAIS) �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 66 Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation (IPA)� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 68 Department Robot and Assistive Systems Fraunhofer Institute for Factory Operation and Automation (IFF) �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 70 Friedrich-Wilhelm-Bessel-Institute Research Company (FWBI) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 72 Robotics for Risky Interventions Friedrich-Wilhelm-Bessel-Institute Research Company (FWBI) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 74 Soft-Robotics Group German Aerospace Center (DLR) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 76 Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics (RMC) Harz University of Applied Sciences � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 78 Department of Automation and Computer Science Mobile Systems Laboratory Humboldt University Berlin � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 80 Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences II Department of Computer Science Cognitive Robotics Hungarian Academy of Sciences � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 82 Computer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Robotics. Sensors and Actuators
    Introduction to Computer Vision and Robotics Florian Teich and Tomas Kulvicius* Introduction to Robotics. Sensors and Actuators Large portion of slides are adopted from Florentin Wörgötter, John Hallam and Simon Reich *[email protected] Perception-Action loop Environment Object Eyes Action Perception Arm Brain Perception-Action loop (cont.) Environment Sense Object Cameras Action Perception Robot-arm Computer Act Plan Outline of the course • L1.CV1: Introduction to Computer Vision. Thresholding, Filtering & Connected Coomponents • L2.CV2: Bilateral Filtering, Morphological Operators & Edge Detection • L3.CV3: Corner Detection & Non-Local Filtering • L4.R1: Introduction to Robotics. Sensors and actuators • L5.R2: Movement generation methods • L6.R3: Path planning algorithms • L7.CV4: Line/Circle Detection, Template Matching & Feature Detection • L8.CV5: Segmentation • L9.CV6: Fate Detection, Pedestrian Tracking & Computer Vision in 3D • L10.R4: Robot kinematics and control • L11.R5: Learning algorithms in robotics I: Supervised and unsupervised learning • L12.R6: Learning algorithms in robotics II: Reinforcement learning and genetic algorithms Introduction to Robotics History of robotics • Karel Čapek was one of the most influential Czech writers of the 20th century and a Nobel Prize nominee (1936). • He introduced and made popular the frequently used international word robot, which first appeared in his play R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots) in 1921. 1890-1938 • “Robot” comes from the Czech word “robota”, meaning “forced labor” • Karel named his brother Josef Čapek as the true inventor of the word robot. History of robotics (cont.) • The word "robotics" also comes from science fiction - it first appeared in the short story "Runaround" (1942) by American writer Isaac Asimov.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Impact of Robotics in Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences: from Insect Navigation to Human Cognitive Development
    IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, Dec 2009 1 On the impact of robotics in behavioral and cognitive sciences: from insect navigation to human cognitive development Pierre-Yves Oudeyer1 Bekey, 2005; Dautenhahn, 2007; Floreano and Abstract— The interaction of robotics with behavioural Mattiussi, 2008; Arbib et al., 2008; Asada et al., 2009). and cognitive sciences has always been tight. As often On the contrary, while there has been many technical described in the literature, the living has inspired the specific articles in the past presenting experiments that construction of many robots. Yet, in this article, we focus changed our understanding of given behavioural or on the reverse phenomenon: building robots can impact importantly the way we conceptualize behaviour and cognitive phenomenon, few synthetic, concise and cognition in animals and humans. I present a series of interdisciplinary overviews exist that specifically focus paradigmatic examples spanning from the modelling of on the potential impact of robotics in behavioural and insect navigation, the experimentation of the role of cognitive sciences, and its conceptualization. morphology to control locomotion, the development of foundational representations of the body and of the (Cordeschi, 2002) presents a thorough technical and self/other distinction, the self-organization of language in comprehensive review targeted at specialists and robot societies, and the use of robots as therapeutic tools historians. (Clark, 1997; Dennet, 1998; Boden, 2006) for children with developmental disorders. Through these emphasize, among other topics, philosophical issues of examples, I review the way robots can be used as operational models confronting specific theories to reality, the use of robots as tools for cognitive sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyborg Insect Drones: Research, Risks, and Governance
    CYBORG INSECT DRONES: RESEARCH, RISKS, AND GOVERNANCE By: Heraclio Pimentel Jr. 12/01/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. BACKGROUND: THE RESEARCH ................................................................................................................................................ 2 A. Emergence of HI-MEMS .................................................................................................................................................. 2 B. Technical Background .................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. The State of the Technology ......................................................................................................................................... 4 D. Intended Applications of HI-MEMS ............................................................................................................................ 6 II. RISKS: DUAL-USE APPLICATIONS OF HI-MEMS ................................................................................................................ 8 A. HI-MEMS Pose a Risk to National Security ............................................................................................................. 9 B. HI-MEMS Pose a Threat to Personal Privacy .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Autonomous Multi-Robot Mobile Deposition for Construction
    YouWasps: Towards Autonomous Multi-Robot Mobile Deposition for Construction Julius Sustarevas1, Benjamin K. X. Tan1, David Gerber2, Robert Stuart-Smith1;3 and Vijay M. Pawar1;3 Abstract— Mobile multi-robot construction systems offer new ways to optimise the on-site construction process. In this paper we begin to investigate the functionality requirements for controlling a team of robots to build structures much greater than their individual workspace. To achieve these aims, we present a mobile extruder robot called YouWasp. We also begin to explore methods for collision aware printing and construction task decomposition and allocation. These are deployed via YouWasp and enable it to deposit material autonomously. In doing so, we are able to evaluate the potential for parallelization of tasks and printing autonomy in simulation as well as physical team of robots. Altogether, these results provide a foundation for future work that enable fleets of mobile construction systems to cooperate and help us shape our built environment in new ways. Fig. 1: Visualisation of YouWasp team of robots deployed in a construction scenario. I. INTRODUCTION The US$8.8 trillion global market value[1] of the con- manufacturing companies such as Apis Cor in Russia, Win- struction sector, shows the unmatched effort that construc- sun Decoration Engineering Company in China, NASA’s tion, as a human endevour, receives. In fact, construction 3D printing in Zero-G and US Armed Forces on-site 3D is often seen as the sector at the forefront of tackling printed barracks. Within this context, typical examples use global challenges like population growth, urbanisation and either gantry-type solutions or industrial robots with 3-to- sustainability[2].
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Robotic Systems Architectures and Programming
    187 8. RoboticRobotic Systems Architectures and Programming Syste David Kortenkamp, Reid Simmons 8.1 Overview.............................................. 187 Robot software systems tend to be complex. This 8.1.1 Special Needs complexity is due, in large part, to the need to con- of Robot Architectures .................. 188 trol diverse sensors and actuators in real time, in 8.1.2 Modularity and Hierarchy.............. 188 the face of significant uncertainty and noise. Robot 8.1.3 Software Development Tools.......... 188 systems must work to achieve tasks while moni- toring for, and reacting to, unexpected situations. 8.2 History ................................................ 189 Doing all this concurrently and asynchronously 8.2.1 Subsumption ............................... 189 adds immensely to system complexity. 8.2.2 Layered Robot Control Architectures 190 The use of a well-conceived architecture, 8.3 Architectural Components ..................... 193 together with programming tools that support 8.3.1 Connecting Components................ 193 the architecture, can often help to manage that 8.3.2 Behavioral Control........................ 195 complexity. Currently, there is no single archi- 8.3.3 Executive .................................... 196 tecture that is best for all applications – different 8.3.4 Planning ..................................... 199 architectures have different advantages and dis- 8.4 Case Study – GRACE ............................... 200 advantages. It is important to understand those strengths and weaknesses when choosing an 8.5 The Art of Robot Architectures ............... 202 architectural approach for a given application. 8.6 Conclusions and Further Reading ........... 203 This chapter presents various approaches to architecting robotic systems. It starts by defining References .................................................. 204 terms and setting the context, including a recount- ing of the historical developments in the area of robot architectures.
    [Show full text]
  • National Robotics Initiative (NRI)(Nsf11553)
    This document has been archived and replaced by NSF 12-607. National Robotics Initiative (NRI) The realization of co-robots acting in direct support of individuals and groups PROGRAM SOLICITATION NSF 11-553 National Science Foundation Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering Division of Information & Intelligent Systems Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences Directorate for Engineering Directorate for Education & Human Resources National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institute on Aging National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Center for Research Resources Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute of Nursing Research U.S. Dept. of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture National Aeronautics and Space Administration Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Game Changing Technology Division Letter of Intent Due Date(s) (required) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time): October 01, 2011 October 1, Annually Thereafter Small Proposals December 15, 2011 December 15, Annually Thereafter Group Large Proposals Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time): November 03, 2011 November 3, Annually Thereafter Small Proposals January 18, 2012 January 18, Annually Thereafter Group Large Proposals IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND REVISION NOTES Public Briefings: One or more collaborative webinar briefings with question and answer functionality will
    [Show full text]
  • New AI and Robotics F. Bonsignorio Heron Robots Institute of Biorobotics
    New AI and Robotics ! ! F. Bonsignorio ! ! ! Heron Robots ! Institute of Biorobotics - SSSA, Pisa ! New AI and Robotics Introduction To take robots out of the factories in everyday life is not a free lunch. Have we the science or even the concept framework to deal with open ended unstructured environments? New AI and Robotics Introduction ! How the new paradigms in AI, from swarm intelligence to morphological computation and complex adaptive systems theory applications, (could) help robotics? Is robotics the science of embodied cognition? Is there a need to extend computation theory to manage the interaction with the physical world? Does robotics needs a 'paradigm change' from top- down symbolic processing to emerging self-organized cognitive behaviors of complez adaptive dynamical systems? New AI and Robotics Introduction Which relations are there between new AI, the US NSF idea of CyberPhysical Systems Science, and the concepts of embodied and situated cognition popular in European cognitive sciences community and a significant part of the robotics community? What does it mean in this context to be 'biomimetic'? New AI and Robotics Caveat :-) ROUTES TO CALIFORNIA AND OREGON 'EMIGRANTS or others desiring to make the overland journey to the Pacific should bear in mind that there are several different routes which may be traveled with wagons, each having its advocates in persons directly or indirectly interested in attracting the tide of emigration and travel over them. Information concerning these routes coming from strangers living or owning property near them, from agents of steam-boats or railways, or from other persons connected with transportation companies, should be received with great caution, and never without corroborating evidence from disinterested sources' From 'The Prairie Traveler', R.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Biorobotics for Veterinary Research Into Cat Movements
    Journal of Veterinary Behavior 10 (2015) 248e254 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Veterinary Behavior journal homepage: www.journalvetbehavior.com In Brief: Practice and Procedure Developing biorobotics for veterinary research into cat movements Chiara Mariti a,*, Giovanni Gerardo Muscolo b, Jan Peters c,d,e, Domenec Puig f, Carmine Tommaso Recchiuto b, Claudio Sighieri a, Agusti Solanas f, Oskar von Stryk c a Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy b CVD & E-I Laboratories, Humanot s.r.l., Prato, Italy c Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany d Department of Empirical Inference, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany e Department of Autonomous Motion, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Tübingen, Germany f Department of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain article info abstract Article history: Collaboration between veterinarians and other professionals such as engineers and computer scientists Received 8 April 2014 will become important in biorobotics for both scientific achievements and the protection of animal Received in revised form welfare. Particularly, cats have not yet become a significant source of inspiration for new technologies in 29 September 2014 robotics. This article suggests a novel approach for the investigation of particular aspects of cat Accepted 31 December 2014 morphology, neurophysiology, and behavior aimed at bridging this gap by focusing on the versatile, Available online 10 January 2015 powerful locomotion abilities of cats and implementing a robotic tool for the measurements of biological parameters of animals and building cat-inspired robotic prototypes. The presented framework suggests Keywords: 3Rs the basis for the development of novel hypotheses and models describing biomechanics, locomotion, biorobotics balancing system, visual perception, as well as learning and adaption of cat motor skills and behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Contributors
    553 About the Contributors Jordi Vallverdú is an associate professor for philosophy of science & computing at Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. He holds a PhD. in philosophy of science (UAB) and a master in history of sciences (physics dept. UAB). After a short research stay as fellowship researcher at Glaxco-Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine-London (1997) and research assistant of Dr. Jasanoff at J.F.K. School of Government – Harvard University (2000), he worked in computing epistemology issues, bioethics (because of the emotional aspects of cognition; he is listed as EU Biosociety Research Expert) and, espe- cially, on synthetic emotions. He co-leads a research group on this last topic, SETE (Synthetic Emotions in Technological Environments), with which has published several book chapters about computational models of synthetic emotions and their implementation into social robotic systems. “ David Casacuberta is a philosophy of science professor in the Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona (Spain). He has a PhD in philosophy and a master degree in cognitive sciences and language. His cur- rent line of research is the cognitive and social impact of new media, and specially, how the inclusion of artificial intelligence and artificial emotions can produce innovative, more interactive and radically different new types of media. * * * Tom Adi was an assistant professor for computer science in the 1980’s. He taught at universities in Jordan and Saudi Arabia. He received a PhD in industrial computer science in 1978 from Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, Germany. While designing a machine translation software in 1985, he discovered a theory of semantics (published in Semiotics and Intelligent Systems Development, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Multiprocess Communication and Control Software for Humanoid Robots Neil T
    IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine Multiprocess Communication and Control Software for Humanoid Robots Neil T. Dantam∗ Daniel M. Lofaroy Ayonga Hereidx Paul Y. Ohz Aaron D. Amesx Mike Stilman∗ I. Introduction orrect real-time software is vital for robots in safety-critical roles such as service and disaster response. These systems depend on software for Clocomotion, navigation, manipulation, and even seemingly innocuous tasks such as safely regulating battery voltage. A multi-process software design increases robustness by isolating errors to a single process, allowing the rest of the system to continue operating. This approach also assists with modularity and concurrency. For real-time tasks such as dynamic balance and force control of manipulators, it is critical to communicate the latest data sample with minimum latency. There are many communication approaches intended for both general purpose and real-time needs [19], [17], [13], [9], [15]. Typical methods focus on reliable communication or network-transparency and accept a trade-off of increased mes- sage latency or the potential to discard newer data. By focusing instead on the specific case of real-time communication on a single host, we reduce communication latency and guarantee access to the latest sample. We present a new Interprocess Communication (IPC) library, Ach,1 which addresses this need, and discuss its application for real-time, multiprocess control on three humanoid robots (Fig. 1). There are several design decisions that influenced this robot software and motivated development of the Ach library. First, to utilize decades of prior development and engineering, we implement our real-time system on top of a POSIX-like Operating System (OS)2.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Machine Learning to Robotics WHITEPAPER
    WHITEPAPER Credit: Pixabay Applying Machine Learning to Robotics TABLE OF CONTENTS MACHINE LEARNING - TOP MARKS FOR POTENTIAL MACHINE LEARNING SOLVES BUSINESS PROBLEMS CURRENT TECHNOLOGIES AND SUPPLIERS MACHINE LEARNING IN ROBOTICS: EXAMPLE 1 MACHINE LEARNING IN ROBOTICS: EXAMPLE 2 MACHINE LEARNING IN ROBOTICS: EXAMPLE 3 NEXT-GENERATION INDUSTRY WILL RELY ON MACHINE LEARNING roboticsbusinessreview.com 2 APPLYING MACHINE LEARNING TO ROBOTICS Advances in artificial intelligence are making robots smarter at pick-and- place operations, drones more autonomous, and the Industrial Internet of Things more connected. Where else could machine learning help? By Andrew Williams A growing number of businesses worldwide are waking up to the potentially transformative capabilities of machine learning - particularly when applied to robotics systems in the workplace. In recent years, the capacity of machine learning to improve efficiency in fields as diverse as manufacturing assembly, pick-and-place operations, quality control and drone systems has also gathered a great deal of momentum. Knowing that machine learning is improving also heightens awareness of great strides being made in artificial intelligence (AI), to the extent that the two technologies are often viewed interchangeably. Major recent advances in topics such as logic and data analytics, algorithm development, and predictive analytics are also driving AI’s growth. In this report, we’ll review the latest cutting-edge machine learning research and development around the globe, and explore some emerging applications in the field of robotics. MACHINE LEARNING - TOP MARKS FOR POTENTIAL A September 2017 report by Research and Markets predicts the global machine learning market will grow from $1.4 billion in 2017 to $8.81 billion by 2022, with a compound annual growth rate of 44.1%.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCS-Assisted Teaching Robots Based on Anticipatory Computing and Emotional Big Data for Improving Sustainable Learning Efficiency and Motivation
    sustainability Article ARCS-Assisted Teaching Robots Based on Anticipatory Computing and Emotional Big Data for Improving Sustainable Learning Efficiency and Motivation Yi-Zeng Hsieh 1,2,3 , Shih-Syun Lin 4,* , Yu-Cin Luo 1, Yu-Lin Jeng 5 , Shih-Wei Tan 1,*, Chao-Rong Chen 6 and Pei-Ying Chiang 7 1 Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung City 202, Taiwan; [email protected] (Y.-Z.H.); [email protected] (Y.-C.L.) 2 Institute of Food Safety and Risk Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung City 202, Taiwan 3 Center of Excellence for Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung City 202, Taiwan 4 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung City 202, Taiwan 5 Department of Information Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan 710, Taiwan; [email protected] 6 Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan; [email protected] 7 Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.-S.L.); [email protected] (S.-W.T.) Received: 3 March 2020; Accepted: 17 June 2020; Published: 12 July 2020 Abstract: Under the vigorous development of global anticipatory computing in recent years, there have been numerous applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in people’s daily lives. Learning analytics of big data can assist students, teachers, and school administrators to gain new knowledge and estimate learning information; in turn, the enhanced education contributes to the rapid development of science and technology.
    [Show full text]