NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Immunol Allergy Clin North Am
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency and T-Cell Lymphopenia in California, 2010−2017 George S
Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency and T-cell Lymphopenia in California, 2010–2017 George S. Amatuni, BS,a,b Robert J. Currier, PhD,a Joseph A. Church, MD,c Tracey Bishop,d Elena Grimbacher,e Alan Anh-Chuong Nguyen, MD,f Rajni Agarwal-Hashmi, MD,g Constantino P. Aznar, PhD,d Manish J. Butte, MD, PhD,h Morton J. Cowan, MD,a Morna J. Dorsey, MD, MMSc,a Christopher C. Dvorak, MD,a Neena Kapoor, MD,c Donald B. Kohn, MD,h M. Louise Markert, MD, PhD,i Theodore B. Moore, MD,h Stanley J. Naides, MD,j Stanley Sciortino, PhD, MPH,d Lisa Feuchtbaum, DrPH, MPH,d Rasoul A. Koupaei, PhD,d Jennifer M. Puck, MDa OBJECTIVES: Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) was instituted in abstract California in 2010. In the ensuing 6.5 years, 3 252 156 infants in the state had DNA from dried blood spots assayed for T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs). Abnormal TREC results were followed-up with liquid blood testing for T-cell abnormalities. We report the performance of the SCID screening program and the outcomes of infants who were identified. METHODS: Data that were reviewed and analyzed included demographics, nursery summaries, TREC and lymphocyte flow-cytometry values, and available follow-up, including clinical and genetic diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes. RESULTS: Infants with clinically significant T-cell lymphopenia (TCL) were successfully identified at a rate of 1 in 15 300 births. Of these, 50 cases of SCID, or 1 in 65 000 births (95% confidence interval 1 in 51 000–1 in 90 000) were found. -
• Cytosis: O Neutrophilia: Defined As an Increase in the Neutrophilic Count in the Peripheral Blood Above Reference Range for Age
HENATOLYMPHOID SYSTEM THIRD YEAR MEDICAL STUDENTS-UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN AHMAD T. MANSOUR, MD NONNEOPLASTIC DISEASES OF THE WHITE BLOOD CELLS • There are five major types of WBCs in the blood: neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, basophils and monocytes. • The normal function of the white blood cells depends on a tight regulation of their count and their function. Therefore, disease develops if there is a derangement of the cells count or function, it takes one of the following forms: o Cytosis: increase in the number of circulating cells above reference range. (Note: leukocytosis means an increase in the WBC count, neutrophilia means increase in the neutrophilic count, lymphocytosis means increase in the lymphocytic count, monocytosis means increase in the monocytic count, basophilia means increase in the basophilic count and eosinophilia means in crease in the eosinophilic count). o Cytopenia: decrease in the number of circulating cells below reference range. (Note: neutropenia means decreased neutrophils, lymphocytopenia, or simply lymphopenia, means decrease in lymphocytes, monocytopenia means decrease in monocytes, eosinopenia means decrease in eosinophils, and basopenia means decrease in basophils). o Abnormal or absent function • Cytosis: o Neutrophilia: defined as an increase in the neutrophilic count in the peripheral blood above reference range for age. o Causes: bacterial infection is the most common and most important etiology. Tissue necrosis in cases of burns or trauma and medications such as epinephrine and corticosteroids are also additional causes for neutrophilia. § Some physiologic conditions can lead to neutrophilia such as stress, smoking and pregnancy. o Pathophysiology: neutrophils are present in the blood in two populations: circulating and marginal (meaning neutrophils stuck to the vessel wall). -
Eosinophilic Cellulitis (Wells Syndrome): a Case Report
International Journal of Research in Dermatology Baabdullah AM et al. Int J Res Dermatol. 2021 May;7(3):450-453 http://www.ijord.com DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20211708 Case Report Eosinophilic cellulitis (wells syndrome): a case report Ahmad Mohammad Baabdullah1, Khalid Ali Al Hawsawi2, Bashayr Saad Alhubayshi3*, Marwa Rashed Gammash4 1Department of Dermatology, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of Dermatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia 3Taibah College of Medicine, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawwarah, Saudi Arabia 4Collage of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Received: 14 January 2021 Accepted: 08 February 2021 *Correspondence: Dr. Bashayr Saad Alhubayshi, E-mail: [email protected] Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Eosinophilic Cellulitis is also known as Wells syndrome is uncommon dermatitis, characterized by the infiltration of eosinophils in the dermis. The exact etiology of the disease is unknown. Clinically, it is highly varied but commonly the presentation is pruritic erythematous plaque. We report a case of one and half years old healthy boy who developed itchy bullae on the dorsum of his hand with multiple erythematous papules over his extremities that started immediately after his vaccines. Histopathological examination of the lesion showed infiltrate eosinophils with typical flame figures. The case was successfully treated with corticosteroid course. -
Practice Parameter for the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Immunodeficiency
Practice parameter Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD, David A. Khan, MD, Zuhair K. Ballas, MD, Javier Chinen, MD, PhD, Michael M. Frank, MD, Joyce T. Hsu, MD, Michael Keller, MD, Lisa J. Kobrynski, MD, Hirsh D. Komarow, MD, Bruce Mazer, MD, Robert P. Nelson, Jr, MD, Jordan S. Orange, MD, PhD, John M. Routes, MD, William T. Shearer, MD, PhD, Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD, James W. Verbsky, MD, PhD, David I. Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard A. Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher R. Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Stephen Tilles, MD, Dana Wallace, MD Chief Editor: Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Co-Editor: David A. Khan, MD Members of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters: David I. Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Khan, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard A. Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher R. Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Stephen Tilles, MD, Dana Wallace, MD Primary Immunodeficiency Workgroup: Chairman: Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Members: Zuhair K. Ballas, MD, Javier Chinen, MD, PhD, Michael M. Frank, MD, Joyce T. Hsu, MD, Michael Keller, MD, Lisa J. Kobrynski, MD, Hirsh D. Komarow, MD, Bruce Mazer, MD, Robert P. Nelson, Jr, MD, Jordan S. Orange, MD, PhD, John M. Routes, MD, William T. Shearer, MD, PhD, Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD, James W. Verbsky, MD, PhD GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Aerocrine; has received payment for lectures from Genentech/ These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck; and has received research support from Genentech/ the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; the American College of Novartis and Merck. -
Current Perspectives on Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
Clinical & Developmental Immunology, June–December 2006; 13(2–4): 223–259 Current perspectives on primary immunodeficiency diseases ARVIND KUMAR, SUZANNE S. TEUBER, & M. ERIC GERSHWIN Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California at Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA Abstract Since the original description of X-linked agammaglobulinemia in 1952, the number of independent primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) has expanded to more than 100 entities. By definition, a PID is a genetically determined disorder resulting in enhanced susceptibility to infectious disease. Despite the heritable nature of these diseases, some PIDs are clinically manifested only after prerequisite environmental exposures but they often have associated malignant, allergic, or autoimmune manifestations. PIDs must be distinguished from secondary or acquired immunodeficiencies, which are far more common. In this review, we will place these immunodeficiencies in the context of both clinical and laboratory presentations as well as highlight the known genetic basis. Keywords: Primary immunodeficiency disease, primary immunodeficiency, immunodeficiencies, autoimmune Introduction into a uniform nomenclature (Chapel et al. 2003). The International Union of Immunological Societies Acquired immunodeficiencies may be due to malnu- (IUIS) has subsequently convened an international trition, immunosuppressive or radiation therapies, infections (human immunodeficiency virus, severe committee of experts every two to three years to revise sepsis), malignancies, metabolic disease (diabetes this classification based on new PIDs and further mellitus, uremia, liver disease), loss of leukocytes or understanding of the molecular basis. A recent IUIS immunoglobulins (Igs) via the gastrointestinal tract, committee met in 2003 in Sintra, Portugal with its kidneys, or burned skin, collagen vascular disease such findings published in 2004 in the Journal of Allergy and as systemic lupus erythematosis, splenectomy, and Clinical Immunology (Chapel et al. -
Complete Blood Count in Primary Care
Complete Blood Count in Primary Care bpac nz better medicine Editorial Team bpacnz Tony Fraser 10 George Street Professor Murray Tilyard PO Box 6032, Dunedin Clinical Advisory Group phone 03 477 5418 Dr Dave Colquhoun Michele Cray free fax 0800 bpac nz Dr Rosemary Ikram www.bpac.org.nz Dr Peter Jensen Dr Cam Kyle Dr Chris Leathart Dr Lynn McBain Associate Professor Jim Reid Dr David Reith Professor Murray Tilyard Programme Development Team Noni Allison Rachael Clarke Rebecca Didham Terry Ehau Peter Ellison Dr Malcolm Kendall-Smith Dr Anne Marie Tangney Dr Trevor Walker Dr Sharyn Willis Dave Woods Report Development Team Justine Broadley Todd Gillies Lana Johnson Web Gordon Smith Design Michael Crawford Management and Administration Kaye Baldwin Tony Fraser Kyla Letman Professor Murray Tilyard Distribution Zane Lindon Lyn Thomlinson Colleen Witchall All information is intended for use by competent health care professionals and should be utilised in conjunction with © May 2008 pertinent clinical data. Contents Key points/purpose 2 Introduction 2 Background ▪ Haematopoiesis - Cell development 3 ▪ Limitations of reference ranges for the CBC 4 ▪ Borderline abnormal results must be interpreted in clinical context 4 ▪ History and clinical examination 4 White Cells ▪ Neutrophils 5 ▪ Lymphocytes 9 ▪ Monocytes 11 ▪ Basophils 12 ▪ Eosinophils 12 ▪ Platelets 13 Haemoglobin and red cell indices ▪ Low haemoglobin 15 ▪ Microcytic anaemia 15 ▪ Normocytic anaemia 16 ▪ Macrocytic anaemia 17 ▪ High haemoglobin 17 ▪ Other red cell indices 18 Summary Table 19 Glossary 20 This resource is a consensus document, developed with haematology and general practice input. We would like to thank: Dr Liam Fernyhough, Haematologist, Canterbury Health Laboratories Dr Chris Leathart, GP, Christchurch Dr Edward Theakston, Haematologist, Diagnostic Medlab Ltd We would like to acknowledge their advice, expertise and valuable feedback on this document. -
ESID Registry – Working Definitions for Clinical Diagnosis of PID
ESID Registry – Working Definitions for Clinical Diagnosis of PID These criteria are only for patients with no genetic diagnosis*. *Exceptions: Atypical SCID, DiGeorge syndrome – a known genetic defect and confirmation of criteria is mandatory. Available entries (Please click on an entry to see the criteria.) Page Acquired angioedema .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Agammaglobulinemia .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Asplenia syndrome (Ivemark syndrome) ................................................................................................................................... 4 Ataxia telangiectasia (ATM) ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Atypical Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (Atypical SCID) ............................................................................................... 5 Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) ................................................................................................................ 5 APECED / APS1 with CMC - Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) .................. 5 Barth syndrome ........................................................................................................................................................................... -
Blueprint Genetics Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Panel
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Panel Test code: IM0101 Is a 80 gene panel that includes assessment of non-coding variants. Is ideal for patients with a clinical suspicion of combined immunodeficiencies. The genes on this panel are included in the Primary Immunodeficiency Panel. About Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Severe combined immunedeficiencies (SCIDs) are a group of primary immunodeficiencies characterized by specific mutations in genes of T and B-lymphocyte systems and leading to little or no immune response. Different subtypes of SCIDs are characterized and subdivided by the presence of circulating T and B cells. T cells are absent or markedly decreased in the most types, but levels of B cells vary. In addition, both of these disease subgroups (T-B+ and T-B-) can occur with or without NK cells. Patients with SCID are susceptible to recurrent infections that can be fatal. The worldwide prevalence of SCID is estimated to be at least 1:100,000 births, while some genetically more homogenous populations may show markedly increased numbers. Mutations in IL2RG are the most common reason for SCIDs, explaining approximately 50% of all cases and close to 100% of X-linked cases. Availability 4 weeks Gene Set Description Genes in the Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Panel and their clinical significance Gene Associated phenotypes Inheritance ClinVar HGMD ADA Severe combined immunodeficiency due to adenosine deaminase AR 49 93 deficiency AK2 Reticular dysgenesis AR 14 17 ATM Breast cancer, Ataxia-Telangiectasia AD/AR 1047 1109 BCL11B Immunodeficiency -
Case Report and Review of Wells' Syndrome in Childhood Amy E
Bullous “Cellulitis” With Eosinophilia: Case Report and Review of Wells’ Syndrome in Childhood Amy E. Gilliam, MD*; Anna L. Bruckner, MD‡; Rene´e M. Howard, MD*; Brian P. Lee, MD§; Susan Wu, MD§; and Ilona J. Frieden, MD* ABSTRACT. A 1-year-old girl presented with acute on- but later simplified the name to eosinophilic celluli- set of edematous erythematous plaques associated with tis.2 bullae on her extremities and accompanied by peripheral Wells’ syndrome is seen more commonly among eosinophilia. She was afebrile, and the skin lesions were adults but has been observed among children. Some pruritic but not tender. The patient was treated with hypothesize that this syndrome may represent a hy- intravenously administered antibiotics for presumed cel- persensitivity response to a circulating antigen.2 As- lulitis, without improvement. However, the lesions re- sponded rapidly to systemic steroid therapy. On the basis sociated precipitants include insect bites, medication of lesional morphologic features, peripheral eosino- reactions, recent immunization, myeloproliferative philia, and cutaneous histopathologic features, a diagno- disorders, malignancies, and infections. We describe sis of Wells’ syndrome was made. Wells’ syndrome is a case of a young child with no identifiable triggering extremely rare in childhood, with 27 pediatric cases re- factors, and we review the evidence for evaluation ported in the literature. Because it is seen so infre- and management of these pediatric cases. quently, there are no specific guidelines for evaluation and management of Wells’ syndrome among children. CASE REPORT The diagnosis should be considered for children with A previously healthy, 1-year-old girl presented with acute on- presumed cellulitis and eosinophilia who fail to respond set of edematous erythematous plaques, with associated bullae, on to antibiotics. -
Bullous Eosinophilic Annular Erythema
Volume 27 Number 5| May 2021 Dermatology Online Journal || Photo Vignette 27(5):16 Bullous eosinophilic annular erythema Yun Pei Koh1, Hong Liang Tey1-3 Affiliations: 1National Skin Centre, Singapore, 2Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 3Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Corresponding Author: Koh Yun Pei, National Skin Centre, 1 Mandalay Road, Singapore 308405, Singapore, Tel: 65-2534455, Email: [email protected] areas of central clearing (Figure 1). Some plaques Abstract were studded with tense vesicles containing yellow Eosinophilic annular erythema is an idiopathic acute serous fluid, coalescing to form large bullae over his eosinophilic dermatosis. It is a rare condition, with left flank (Figure 2). Total body surface area involved approximately 30 cases reported in the English was 12%. literature. It features annular, figurate urticarial edematous plaques primarily affecting the trunk and Histological examination showed superficial and proximal limbs. During evaluation of a patient, deep perivascular infiltrate of predominantly secondary causes of eosinophilic inflammation such eosinophils and some lymphocytes (Figure 3). as allergy-related conditions (eczema, drug, urticaria, Epidermal involvement, apoptotic keratinocytes, contact dermatitis), parasitic infestations, and interface dermatitis, blistering, vasculitis, or autoimmune dermatoses will need to be excluded. granulomatous inflammation were all absent. Direct We present an unusual case of a 47-year-old patient who developed this condition. Keywords: eosinophilic dermatoses, urticaria Introduction Idiopathic primary eosinophilic dermatoses are a group of primarily eosinophil-driven skin disease characterized by moderate-to-dense eosinophilic skin infiltration with no significant infiltration of other leukocytes. Our case is consistent with one subtype of these conditions—eosinophilic annular erythema (EAE). -
PDF Full-Text
PRACTITIONER'S CORNER Long-term Remission of Wells Syndrome With and flame figures compatible with Wells syndrome. Initially, Omalizumab the patient was treated with antihistamines at up to 4-fold higher than the licensed dose, then with topical and systemic corticosteroids, followed by azathioprine up to 150 mg daily, Coattrenec Y1, Ibrahim Yasmine L2, Harr T1, Spoerl D1*, Jandus P1* tranexamic acid up to 1000 mg 3 times daily, and, finally, a 1Division of Immunology and Allergology, Department of Internal gluten-free diet. None of these approaches was successful. Medicine, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Geneva, Despite eradication of Helicobacter pylori, the recurrent skin Switzerland lesions and edema persisted. The patient was lost to follow-up 2Division of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital and Medical and treated by various doctors. Detailed data are not available. Faculty, Geneva, Switzerland He eventually came to our clinic 10 years later in 2017 *DS and PJ contributed equally to this work. because of exacerbation of skin symptoms while receiving antihistamines and topical corticosteroids. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2020; Vol. 30(1): 58-59 doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0436 A new skin biopsy (Figure) revealed a dermal infiltrate of perivascular and interstitial lymphocytes and histiocytes with Key words: Wells syndrome. Eosinophilic cellulitis. Omalizumab. Successful treatment. Palabras clave: Síndrome Wells. Celulitis eosinofílica. Omalizumab. Tratamiento eficaz. Eosinophilic cellulitis (Wells syndrome) is an uncommon recurrent inflammatory dermatosis. It is characterized by wide clinical variability comprising itching and/or burning tender erythematous lesions, sometimes with urticaria, vesicles and/or bullae, and granulomatous eosinophilic infiltrates in the dermis. The condition was first described by Wells in 1971, and, to date, fewer than 200 cases have been reported in the literature. -
March 7, 2014
ACP AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INTERNAL MEDICINE Doctors for Adults NEW JERSEY CHAPTER AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS REGIONAL SCIENTIFIC MEETING ASSOCIATES ABSTRACT COMPETITION MARCH 7, 2014 PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS: Atlantic Health System - Morristown Memorial Hospital - Overlook Hospital Atlanticare Regional Medical Center Barnabas Health System - Monmouth Medical Center - Newark Beth Israel Medical Center - Saint Barnabas Medical Center Capital Health System Drexel University College of Medicine, Saint Peter’s University Hospital HUMC Mountainside Hospital Meridian Health System - Jersey Shore University Medical Center Mount Sinai School of Medicine - Englewood - Jersey City Medical Center Palisades Medical Center Raritan Bay Medical Center Rowan University - Cooper Medical School - School of Osteopathic Medicine Rutgers - Robert Wood Johnson Medical School - New Jersey Medical School Seton Hall University School of Health and Sciences Medical Science - Trinitas Regional Medical Center - St. Francis Medical Center COMMITTEE MEMBERS: William E. Farrer, MD, FACP – Chairperson Neil Kothari, MD, FACP Ed Liu, MD- Co- Chairperson Michael B. Steinberg, MD, MPH, FACP Vallur Thirumavalavan, MD Shuvendu Sen, MD DISCLAIMER: It is assumed that all participants adhered to the rules as stated in the original abstract submission form. It is also assumed that the abstracts submitted were original works, represented by the true authors. The abstracts appear in no particular order. Judging was performed in an attempt to minimize bias. Judges were unaware of the authors or institutions the competitor unless they were directly involved with the associate. Although there were many excellent abstracts those selected to be presented as poster or oral presentation were chosen on the basis of content. This content was felt to be intriguing from a clinical education standpoint, thought provoking, or could stimulate debate regarding our current practice of medicine.