London Airspace Change: Gatwick Local Area Consultation 2014 ---- Final Report 137

Appendix F: Marked-up Codeframes

Gatwick Local Area Consultation Marked-up Codeframe - Response Form (General Public Responses)

This document provides the topline results for a consultation on proposed changes to airspace in the vicinity of Gatwick Airport.

The consultation ran from 23rd May to 15th August 2014. Respondents took part online via a survey link on Gatwick Airport's website.

2,836 members of the public aged 16 and over took part in the consultation via the online response form..

Results to each question are based on all answering. This means that the base for each question may be different.

Results are also based on absolute numbers, and not percentages Total Base size: 2716 Q.1a Which ONE of the SIX alternative proposed options, if any, do you believe provides the best balance of benefits for RWY26 departures? Option A 33 Option A with night-time respite 79 Option B 7 Option B with night-time respite 33 Option C 64 Option C with night-time respite 95 None of these 1528 Don’t know 877 Base size: 2713 Q.1b Which, if any, noise concerns do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining the best option for RWY26 departures heading to the south? Noise in the day that impacts my quality of life 1878 Noise at night that disturbs my sleep 1863 Noise in the day that affects my business or company /the business or company within which I work 241 Noise at night that affects my business or company / the business or company within which I work 128 Noise in the day that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 446 Noise at night that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 437 Noise over the countryside in the daytime 1102 Noise over the countryside at night 1026 Noise over populated areas in the daytime 1463 Noise over populated areas at night 1524 Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks 914 Noise impacts my health 1372 Potential noise impact on house prices 1568 Potential noise impact on local tourism 500 Other answers 925 CAMPAIGNS / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGNS 352 C502 - KENT COUNTY COUNCIL - PENSHURST PARISH COUNCIL 23 C502 - Complete 19 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 4 C502 - S2/3 - To centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 4 C504 - CAGNE EAST 329 C504 - Q1B 328 C504 - Q1B - S1/1 - Complete - I believe that as these proposals are not relevant to our area, they are best responded to by those affected 328 C504 - Q2C 2 C504 - Q2C - S1/1 - Complete - I support the most practical width that causes the least disturbance to those being overflown 2 CONCERNS / GENERAL 271 All of the above needs to be considered 10 Concerns about the altitude of flights / low flights (Net) 20 Concerns about altitude of flights / low flights 17 Concerns about altitude of flights over Beare Green 1 Concerns about altitude of flights over 1 Concerns about altitude of flights over 1 Concerns about altitude of flights over Tunbridge Wells 1 Concerns about altitude of flights over 1 Concerns about compensation / lack of adequate compensation 3 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths 34 Concerns about flight paths / flight path trials 16 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over AONB/ areas enjoyed recreationally 6 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Beare Green 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Betchworth 2 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Brockham 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Crowborough 3 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Holmwood 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Ifold 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Kingsfold 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Leith 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Plaistow 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Rowhook 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Rusper 2 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Warnham 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights (Net) 17 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights 16 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Southborough 1 Concerns about night flights / early morning flights / respite is essential 6 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise (Net) 127 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise 65 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over peaceful / tranquil areas 12 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over rural areas / countryside 9 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over areas of historic / cultural importance 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over conservation areas / wildlife parks / SSSI 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Betchworth 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Bidborough 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Brockham 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Chiddingstone 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Farlington 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Horsham 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Ifold 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Plaistow 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Rusper 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Speldhurst 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Tunbridge Wells 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Warnham 3 Noise affects / impacts countryside / rural areas more than urban / built up areas 4 Noise affects / impacts / wakes people early in the morning / keeps people awake late at night / affects sleep 24 Noise affects / impacts me now / did not previously 6 Noise affects / impacts my sleep in the daytime / shiftworker 5 Concerns about people who purchased property to avoid noise / will be affected / now affected by noise 23 Concerns about profit being put before people / benefits only GAL 10 Concerns about safety 2 Concerns about impact 173 Concerns about the impact of arrivals 2 Concerns about the impact on 1 Concerns about the impact on children / young people 21 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 13 Concerns about the impact on community facilities 1 Concerns about the impact of departures 1 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 5 Concerns about the impact on farms / farmland / livestock 1 Concerns about the impact on Fordcombe 1 Concerns about the impact on housing / proposed housing sites 1 Concerns about the impact on Lambs Green 1 Concerns about the impact on local businesses / tourist attractions 5 Concerns about the impact on local infrastructure 3 Concerns about the impact on local roads / transport infrastructure 6 Concerns about the impact on previously unaffected areas / people 7 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / the countryside 2 Concerns about the impact on Slinfold 2 Concerns about the impact on TV / radio signal / reception 5 Concerns about the impact on the environment 8 Concerns about the impact on wildlife 4 Concerns about the impact on Wisborough Green 1 Concerns about the impact on Woodhatch 1 Concerns about the impact to the quality of life / health & well being / sleep 91 Concerns about the impact to air quality / pollution / emissions / fuel discharge 51 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 19 All homes affected by Gatwick noise should have air conditioning fitted 1 All homes affected by Gatwick noise should have triple glazing fitted 1 Aircraft should be quieter 1 Changes should be within the current NPR 1 Change should impact the least number of people 1 Flights should be routed further south 1 Flight paths should avoid populated areas / be routed over field / countryside 2 Frequency / volume of flights should be reduced 3 Gatwick airport activity should comply with government environmental policy / EC directives 5 Noise should be reduced / no increase in aircraft noise 6 Noise should be restricted to areas with high levels of background / ambient noise / areas already used to noise / aircraft noise 1 RWY26 departures should utilise the TIGER/DAGGA/WIZARD route more 1 SUPPORT 14 Good for the economy / economic prosperity / future employment opportunities 1 Good for the future of 1 Good for the safety / a safe proposal 1 Support (conditional( for narrow swathes 1 Support respite for night time / day time / multiple routes for respite 4 Support steeper approach / descent for arrivals 1 Support shortened NPRs / means aircraft can attain 4000 ft sooner / reduce noise on the ground 3 Support wide / broad NPR swathes / disperse noise / disturbance over a wider area / are fairer / provide respite 10 OPPOSE 45 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / no new flight paths / NPRs 26 Oppose flight path trials / return to pre-trial / ADNID trial flight paths 7 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights 1 Oppose narrow flight path / swathe / centreline concentrates noise / disturbance / is unfair 8 Oppose night / early morning flights / no additional night time flights 2 Oppose PBN / narrow flight path / swathe 5 MISCELLANEOUS 55 I am / we are not affected by this proposal 36 Mentions of a superhighway / motorway in the sky 1 Response requires follow up 2 See previous response 2 Stakeholder response 1 Other (misc) 14 None of these 76 Don't know 162 Base size: 2684 Q.1c If Gatwick Airport Limited were to implement the proposed route, what width NPR swathe do you think is most appropriate? 2 Kilometres 193 1.5 kilometres 43 1 kilometre 90 500 metres 208 Others answers 2159 CAMPAIGN / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGN 737 C501 - Q1C 401 C501 - Q1C - Complete 272 C501 - Q1C - S1/3 - The smaller the swathe narrows impact on neighbouring areas 29 C501 - Q1C - S2/3 - I feel that this system will bring total misery to those on the ground 44 C501 - Q1C - S3/3 - NPR swathes should not be changed 114 C501 - Q1E 1 C501 - Q1E - S4/7 - The maps do not take into account the elevated location of peoples homes 1 C502 15 C502 - Complete 8 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick. 6 C502 - S2/3 - Arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 4 C502 - S3/3 - In favour of a respite option for night flights, again across a broad swathe area 2 C504 - Q1C 315 C504 - Q1A - S1/1 - Complete - I believe that as these proposals are not relevant to our area, they are best responded to by those affected 315 C504 - Q2C 4 C504 - Q2C - S1/1 - Complete - I support the most practical width that causes the least disturbance to those being overflown 4 C504 - Q6B 1 C504 - Q6B - S1/1 - Complete - Although I am not in agreement with the proposal on balance, NPR swathes should always indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 1 CONCERNS / GENERAL 178 Minimum possible width 6 < 500 meters 4 >500 meters 1 <1 kilometre 1 >2 kilometres 9 3 kilometres / as present 14 >3 kilometres 1 4 kilometres 2 5 kilometres 11 Between 5 - 10 kilometres 1 10 kilometres 4 Between 10 - 20 kilometres 1 20 kilometres 3 >20 kilometres 5 As wide as possible / maximum width 20 Concerns about aircraft not following flight paths / staying within NPRs 5 Concerns about the altitude / height of aircraft / flights (Net) 9 Concerns about altitude / height of aircraft / flights 6 Concerns about altitude / height of aircraft / flights over Alford Bars 1 Concerns about altitude / height of aircraft / flights over Kirdford 1 Concerns about altitude / height of aircraft / flights over Nutfield / South Nutfield 1 Concerns about compensation / lack of compensation 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs (Net) 6 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs over AONBs / countryside / rural areas 2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs over Edenbridge 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs over Warnham 2 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 14 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights 11 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Alford Bars 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Kirdford 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Tonbridge 1 Impact 78 Concerns about the impact of narrow swathes / planes routed along a centreline 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / aircraft noise 24 Concerns about the impact of noise / aircraft noise on Horsham 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / aircraft noise on Tonbridge 1 Concerns about the impact on communities / residential areas 14 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 1 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations like Crowborough 1 Concerns about the impact on house prices / property market 5 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 13 Concerns about the impact on previously unaffected areas 3 Concerns about the impact on Rusper 1 Concerns about the impact on the environment 1 Concerns about the impact on the quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 30 Concerns about the impact to air quality / pollution / emissions etc 3 Concerns about profit being put before people / changes are for the benefit of GAL / shareholders only 4 PBN / modern navigational methods mean navigation has improved / could be improved 8 Width of NPR swathe is irrelevant / immaterial / not important 8 Width of NPR swathe would depend on if the aircraft is turning / flying straight 2 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 28 Flight paths 19 Flight paths / NPRs should achieve / fly at a greater altitude (before turning( 1 Flight paths / NPRs should be enforced / planes should stay with NPR 4 Flight paths / NPRs should comply with government environmental policy / EC Directives 1 Flight paths should avoid Billingshurst 2 Flight paths should avoid Crowborough 2 Flight paths should avoid Horsham 2 Flight paths should avoid Langton Green 1 Flight paths should avoid Tunbridge Wells 1 Flight paths should avoid residential / populated areas / stay over countryside / open areas 6 Flight paths should avoid rural areas / countryside / stay over areas with existing high background noise 1 Night flights should be reduced 1 Noise / disruption / disturbance should be reduced / minimised 1 Multiple routes should be provided to spread the disruption / provide respite 7 SUPPORT 90 Support flight paths that create least possible noise / disruption / impact fewest people 5 Support narrow NPR swathes 7 Support narrow NPR swathes / fewer people disrupted / impacted by noise 10 Support option that means least noise / disruption / impact to fewest people 2 Support respite / restrictions on night time flights 2 Support shorter / shortened NPRs 1

Support wide NPR swathes / means disturbance / noise is dispersed / spread over a wider area / is fairer 56 Support wide NPR swathes / means multiple routes within NPR to offer respite 8 Support wide NPR swathes 9 OPPOSE 248 Oppose all options / oppose options A, B and C 1 Oppose changes to flight paths / routes / NPR swathes / no new flight paths / no new NPRs 164 Oppose changes to flight paths / routes / NPR swathes until more research has been carried out 8 Oppose changes to flight paths / routes / NPR swathes / will impact those beneath them / previous unaffected people 7 Oppose flight path trials / return to pre-ADNID / pre-February trial flight path / routes 33 Oppose flight paths / NPRs over Ifold 1 Oppose increases in frequency / volume of flights / air traffic 6 Oppose increases in noise / additional aircraft noise 9 Oppose narrow NPR swathes 14 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / narrow swathes do not solve the noise problem 1 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / unfair / will increase / concentrate noise / disruption / impact on those directly beneath them 48 Oppose night flights / early morning flights / no night flights 2 Oppose single route / NPR 2 Oppose wider NPR swathes / means disruption / noise is dispersed / spread / shared over a wider area / more people suffer 4 MISCELLANEOUS 66 I am not / will be be affected by this proposal 36 See previous 18 Other (misc) 13 None of these 524 Don't know 468 Base size: 1679 Q.1d If you have answered question 1c, what were the reasons for your choice? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 258 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 475 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 931 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 206 NPR swathes affect tourism 166 None of these 21 Don't know 37 Others answers 593 CAMPAIGN / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGN 328 C501 - Q1C 2 C501 - Q1C - Complete 1 C501 - Q1C - S1/3 - The smaller the swathe narrows impact on neighbouring areas 1 C501 - Q1C - S3/3 - NPR swathes should not be changed 1 C501 - Q1E 3 C501 - Q1E - S1/7 - No new NPRs over areas not previously flown over 3 C501 - Q1E - S3/7 - The noise contours do not cover a wide enough area that is already affected by plane noise 1 C501 - Q2C 2 C501 - Q2A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to and Kent areas 2 C502 11 C502 - Complete 4 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 6 C502 - S2/3 - Centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 4 C502 - S3/3 - In favour of a respite option for night flights, again across a broad swathe area 1 C504 - Q1D 307 C504 - Q1D - S1/1 - Complete - I believe that as these proposals are not relevant to our area, they are best responded to by those affected 307 C504 - Q2D 3 C504 - Q2D - Complete 3 C504 - Q6B 1 C504 - Q6B - S1/1 - Complete - Although I am not in agreement with the proposal on balance, NPR swathes should always indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 1 CONCERNS / GENERAL 111 Noise 41 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise 26 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise at night 2 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Billingshurst 2 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Dorking 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Horsham 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Ifold 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Rusper 1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around the South Downs National Park 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Tunbridge Wells 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over previously unaffected areas 6 Concerns about the impact of noise from aircraft turning 1 All of the above 1 Concerns about aircraft not staying / flying within (current( NPRs 4 Concerns about flight path trials / return to pre-February 2014 ADNID trial flight path 18 Concerns about profit being put before people / changes are for the benefit of GAL / shareholders only 5 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft 4 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 8 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights 7 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over North Holmwood 1 Concerns about the assumption of a causal link between PBN, navigation accuracy and noise reduction 1 Impact 80 Concerns about the impact on air quality / pollution / emissions 9 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 1 Concerns about the impact on the environment 1 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 18 Concerns about the impact to livelihoods / local businesses / tourist industry 1 Concerns about the impact on quality of life / health and well being / sleep 47 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / countryside / farmland / AONB 6 Concerns about the impact on wildlife / diversity 1 Concerns about the impact on those directly beneath flight path / NPR 4 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 18 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 22 Should ensure any changes are within the existing NPRs 1 Should comply with government / EU environmental policy 2 Should agree NPRs among / balance the needs of Gatwick / CAA / DfT / local communities 1 Should enforce NPRs / ensure aircraft stay within NPR 9 Should increase the altitude of the NPR to above 4000ft 2

Should exploit modern technology to minimise disturbance / reduce noise / frequency / increase efficiency 1 Should require airlines to pay additional taxes / be fined for using old noisier planes 1 Should reduce frequency / volume of flights 2 Should reduce noise / minimise impact of noise 5 Should route flight paths / NPRs further south 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid built up / residential areas 5 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Billingshurst 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Horsham 1 SUPPORT 49 Support correction of NPRs 1 Support correction of NPR swathes / should accurately indicate where aircraft fly 1 Support correction of NPR swathes / should accurately indicate impact of noise 2 Support narrow NPRs / PBN 4 Support new technology / PBN being used to define NPRs 1 Support shortened NPRs (conditional( 1 Support variable swathes 1 Support wide swathes 3 Support wide NPR swathes / disperse noise / spread disturbance over a wider area / are fairer 33 Support wide NPR swathes / allows for multiple routes / provides respite 6 OPPOSE 80 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes / many people will be impacted / no new NPRs / no new flight paths 6 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes 29 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights / additional flights 9 Oppose increases to noise / additional aircraft noise 9 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN 5 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / are unfair / cause misery affect the quality of life / health / well being of those directly beneath 12 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / will cause economic damage to those directly beneath 2 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / on the ground 14 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / will increase pollution / impact air quality for those directly beneath / on the ground 1 Oppose the proposed single entry / point merge flight control system 1 Oppose new flight paths / NPRs 2 Oppose night time / early morning flights 3 Oppose wide / wider NPRs 2 MISCELLANEOUS 65 Mentions of a Superhighway / motorway in the sky 1 Further research / investigation / additional information needed 3 Response contains technical data regarding noise / measurement of noise 1 Mentions of developing other airports / building a new airport / airport in Thames Estuary 1 I am not / will not be affected by this proposal 35 See previous response 24 Other (misc) 1 Base size: 674 Q.1e What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the options put forward for RWY26 departures heading to the south? Q1EE - RWY26 - DEPARTURES HEADING SOUTH 674 OPTION A 482 Criticism of the ADNID route / flight path trial 157 Oppose ADNID route / flight path trial 81 Oppose Option A / Option A is the worst option 25 Support Option A / Option A is the best option 3 Positive comments (option A) 1 Option A route follows major roads / stays above areas of high ambient noise 1 Negative comments (option A) 376 Option A will have a negative impact on a greater number of people 1 Option A will have a negative impact on communities / residents 18 Option A will have a negative impact on property / property prices 5 Option A will have a negative impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 11 Option A will have a negative impact on the residents of 5 Option A will have a negative impact on the residents of Horsham 7 Option A will have a negative impact on the residents of Rusper 5 Option A will have a negative impact on the residents of Slinfold 2 Option A will have a negative impact on the residents of Warnham 7 Option A will have a negative impact on those not previously on flight paths / routes / NPRs 9 Option A will have a negative impact on Warnham Nature Reserve 2 Option A will increase air pollution in the area 5 Option A will increase noise in the area 12 Option A will increase the frequency / volume of flights over the area 2 Option A will not be compliant with government environmental policy 2 ADNID route / flight path trial altitude is decreasing / has decreased / has lowered recently over my area 11 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased the frequency / volume of flights over the area 49 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on businesses 5 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on communities / residents 45 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on property / property prices 25 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 171 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on my area 16 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the environment 5 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Betchworth 5 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Bletchingley 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Broadbridge Heath 3 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Brockham 5 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Billingshurst 5 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Coldharbour 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Dormansland 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Godstone 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of 2 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Holmwood 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Horsham 62 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Ifold 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Kingsfold 6 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Leigh 2 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Loxwood 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of North Holmwood 2 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Nutfield 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Plaistow 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Redhill 2 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of 6 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Rowhook 2 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Rusper 16 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Seaford 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Sevenoaks 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Slinfold 9 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of 2 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Tunbridge Wells 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Warnham 27 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Wealden area 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Wisborough Green 1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Worthing 2 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on those not previously on flight paths / routes / NPRs 39 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased night time / early morning flights in our area 34 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased noise in the area 173 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased noise over Rusper 1 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased noise over Leigh 1 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased noise over Reigate 1 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased pollution / impacted on air quality in the area 18 Concerns about lack of prior consultation on flight path changes / ADNID trial 36 Alternative suggestions (option A) 140 Return to pre-ADNID trial flight path / routes / pre-February trial flight path 140 OPTION B 35 Oppose Option B / Option B is the worst option 8 Support Option B / Option B is the best option 3 Positive comments (option B) 5 Option B means flight path / route will avoid populated / residential areas like Capel 1 Option B means flight path / route will avoid populated / residential areas like Rusper 1 Option B means flight path / route will avoid populated / residential areas like Warnham 2 Option B will have least impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 1 Option B will have least impact from noise during the day 1 Option B will have least impact from noise during the night 1 Option B route follows major roads / stays above areas of high ambient noise 1 Option B will affect the fewest people (who are not already affected( 1 Option B will reduce noise / disturbance from aircraft noise 1 Option B is the least worst option / best compromise 1 Negative comments (option B) 22 Option B will have a negative impact on communities / residents 7 Option B will have a negative impact on property / property prices 4 Option B will have a negative impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 3 Option B will have a negative impact on the residents of Broadbridge Heath 1 Option B will have a negative impact on the residents of Horsham 2 Option B will have a negative impact on the residents of Rusper 2 Option B will have a negative impact on the residents of Warnham 1 Option B will have a negative impact on those not previously on flight paths / routes / NPRs 5 Option B will not be compliant with government environmental policy 2 Option B will increase the frequency / volume of flights over the area 1 Option B will increase noise in the area 2 OPTION C 67 Support Option C / Option C is the best option 21 Oppose Option C / Option C is the worst option 8 Positive comments (option C) 32 Option C is the least worst option / best compromise 9 Option C means least change / closest alignment to existing flight paths 11 Option C will affect the fewest people (who are not already affected( 10 Option C will have least impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 2 Option C will have least impact from noise during the day 1 Option C will have least impact from noise during the night 1 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas 2 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Alfold 1 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Broadbridge Heath 1 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Five Oaks 1 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Horsham 7 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Loxwood 1 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Slinfold 1 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Warnham 4 Negative comments (option C) 24 Option C will have a negative impact on the residents of Alfold 3 Option C will have a negative impact on the residents of Kingsfold 3 Option C will have a negative impact on the residents of Rusper 1 Option C will have a negative impact on communities / residents 6 Option C will have a negative impact on those not previously on flight paths / routes / NPRs 8 Option C will increase noise in the area 3 Option C will not be compliant with government environmental policy 2 Option C will increase the frequency / volume of flights over the area 1 Option C will have a negative impact on property / property prices 2 Night time respite 2 Option C with night time respite will have the least impact on Kingsfold 1 Option C with night time respite is the least worse option / best compromise 1 Alternative suggestions (option C) 1 Option C should avoid populated / residential areas / Horsham 1 OTHER OPTIONS / RWY26 - DEPARTURES HEADING SOUTH 257 I am not affected by RWY26 departures / departures heading South / listen to views of those affected 64 Support 3 Conditional support for proposed options for RWY26 departures heading south 1 Support / all options for changes to RWY26 departures 2 Oppose 152 All options / options A / B / C are too similar 4 All options / options A / B / C will have a negative impact on residents below the new NPRs 6 All options will have a negative impact on populated / residential areas 18 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for RWY26 departures 9 Concerns about the impact of RWY26 departures aircraft noise 6 Concerns about the impact of RWY26 southbound TIGER / DAGGA / WIZARD departures on Crowborough 1 Oppose / against any / all options for changes to RWY26 departures 120 Proposed RWY26 departures will negatively impact quality of life / health and well being / sleep 2 RWY26 departures / maps are insufficient / lack detail / more maps are required 5 Alternative suggestions 53 RWY26 DVR / CLN / BIG / LAM departures should avoid quiet / rural areas / Betchworth 3 RWY26 DVR / CLN / BIG / LAM departures should fly south of Sevenoaks 1 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should avoid populated / residential areas 10 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should avoid populated / residential areas / Broadbridge Heath 1 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should avoid populated / residential areas / Horsham 10

RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should avoid populated / residential areas / Rusper 1

RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should avoid populated / residential areas / Slinfold 2 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should avoid populated / residential areas / Warnham 4 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should fly further North before turning South 1 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should fly further West before turning South 1 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should fly over rural areas / Alfold 1 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should fly over rural areas / Ellens Green 1 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should follow SAM / KENET route / stay between Capel / Kingsfold 3 RWY26 southbound routes should diverge from SAM / KENET further West / after Loxwood 4 RWY26 southbound TIGER / DAGGA / WIZARD departures turning east should avoid Crowborough 1

RWY26 departures should be spread as widely as possible / to disperse / not concentrate negative impact 12 RWY26 departures should follow SAM / KENET route / midway between Dorking / Horsham 1 RWY26 departures should utilise the BOGNA / HARDY-SFD route more 3 RWY26 departures should utilise the TIGER / DAGGA / WIZARD route more 4 Base size: 2505 Q.2a Compared with today’s routes, do you believe the proposed realignment for RWY08 departures to the east/northeast of Gatwick Airport is better or worse? The proposed realignment is ... Much better 71 Somewhat better 164 Somewhat worse 99 Much worse 670 Don’t know 1501 Better 235 Worse 769 Net better -534 Base size: 2452 Q.2b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining whether to realign the RWY08 departures to the east/northeast? Noise in the day that impacts my quality of life 1502 Noise at night that disturbs my sleep 1513 Noise in the day that affects my business or company /the business or company within which I work 197 Noise at night that affects my business or company / the business or company within which I work 134 Noise in the day that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 474 Noise at night that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 450 Noise over the countryside in the daytime 1119 Noise over the countryside at night 1068 Noise over populated areas in the daytime 1169 Noise over populated areas at night 1081 Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks 1087 Noise impacts my health 1113 Potential noise impact on house prices 1139 Potential noise impact on local tourism 477 Other answers 890 CAMPAIGNS / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGNS 72 C501 - CAGNE 23 C501 - Q2A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to Surrey and Kent areas 21 C501 - Q3A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to East Grinstead 2 C502 - KENT COUNTY COUNCIL - PENSHURST PARISH COUNCIL 10 C502 - Complete 6 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 3 C502 - S2/3 - To centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 4 C504 - CAGNE EAST 39 C504 - Q1B 6 C504 - Q1B - S1/1 - Complete - I believe that as these proposals are not relevant to our area, they are best responded to by those affected 6 C504 - Q2B 29 C504 - Q2B - Complete 21 C504 - Q2B - S1/6 - I believe that many factors should be taken into account including 8 C504 - Q2B - S2/6 - Noise that affects health 2 C504 - Q2B - S3/6 - Noise at night that disturbs people's sleep 1 C504 - Q2B - S5/6 - Noise in the daytime that affects our schools and community facilities 1 C504 - Q2B - S6/6 - Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, National Parks and historic houses and gardens 1 C504 - Q2A 1 C504 - Q2A - S4/4 - Complete 1 C504 - Q2C 1 C504 - Q2C - S1/1 - Complete - I support the most practical width that causes the least disturbance to those being overflown 1 C504 - Q3B 1 C504 - Q3B - Complete 1 C504 - Q4B 1 C504 - Q4B - S1/1 - Complete - Are not relevant to our area and are best dealt with by those affected 1 CONCERNS / GENERAL 132 All of the above needs to be considered 15 Concerns about the altitude of flights / low flights (Net) 7 Concerns about altitude of flights / low flights 4 Concerns about altitude of flights over Crowborough 2 Concerns about altitude of flights over Langton Green 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths 15 Concerns about flight paths / flight path trials 6 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over AONB/ areas enjoyed recreationally 3 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Bletchingley 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Earlswood 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over East Grinstead 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Godstone 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Holmwood 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Horsham 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Nutfield 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Redhill 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Reigate 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Warnham 2 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights (Net) 17 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights 15 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Crowborough 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Tonbridge 1 Concerns about night flights / early morning flights / respite is essential 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise (Net) 42 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise 28 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over peaceful / tranquil areas 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over rural areas / countryside 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over areas of historic / cultural importance 3 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over conservation areas / wildlife parks / SSSI 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Bletchingley 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Earlswood 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Felcourt 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Godstone 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Nutfield 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Redhill 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Reigate 1 Noise affects / impacts countryside / rural areas more than urban / built up areas 2 Noise affects / impacts / wakes people early in the morning / keeps people awake late at night / affects sleep 4 Concerns about people who purchased property to avoid noise / will be affected / now affected by noise 8 Concerns about profit being put before people / benefits only GAL 6 Concerns about proximity to Heathrow / other flights / aircraft 6 Concerns about RWY26 westerly departures 2 Concerns about impact 71 Concerns about the impact on children / young people 1 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 15 Concerns about the impact on community facilities 1 Concerns about the impact of departures 2 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 3 Concerns about the impact on farms / farmland / livestock 2 Concerns about the impact on Hever / Hever Castle 2 Concerns about the impact on local businesses / tourist attractions 6 Concerns about the impact on local infrastructure 1 Concerns about the impact on local roads / transport infrastructure 2 Concerns about the impact on previously unaffected areas / people 4 Concerns about the impact on Penshurst Place 1 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / the countryside 1 Concerns about the impact on the environment 7 Concerns about the impact on wildlife 4 Concerns about the impact to the quality of life / health & well being / sleep 24 Concerns about the impact to air quality / pollution / emissions / fuel discharge 23 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 13 Flights should depart in a straight line until 5000 ft 1 Flights should not turn until reaching 5000 ft 1 Flight paths should avoid populated areas / be routed over field / countryside 2 Frequency / volume of flights should be reduced 2 Gatwick airport activity should comply with government environmental policy / EC directives 2 New flight paths in the westerly directions should be similar to the proposals for flight paths in the easterly direction 1 Noise should be reduced / no increase in aircraft noise 5 SUPPORT 11 Good for the economy / economic prosperity / future employment opportunities 1 Good for the future of Sussex 1 Good for the safety / a safe proposal 1 Support (conditional( if noise is reduced as a result 1 Support (conditional( for narrow swathes 1 Support shortened NPRs / means aircraft can attain 4000 ft sooner / reduce noise on the ground 1 Support wide / broad NPR swathes / disperse noise / disturbance over a wider area / are fairer / provide respite 8 OPPOSE 38 Oppose / against RWY08 departure option heading East / North East 1 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / no new flight paths / NPRs 23 Oppose flight path trials / return to pre-trial / ADNID trial flight paths 7 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights 1 Oppose narrow flight path / swathe / centreline concentrates noise / disturbance / is unfair 10 Oppose night / early morning flights / no additional night time flights 2 MISCELLANEOUS 88 I am / we are not affected by this proposal 54 See previous response 23 Other (misc) 11 None of these 74 Don't know 505 Base size: 2425 Q.2c If Gatwick Airport Limited were to implement the proposed route, what width NPR swathe do you think is most appropriate? 2 Kilometres 155 1.5 kilometres 42 1 kilometre 80 500 metres 189 Others answers 1963 CAMPAIGN / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGN 433 C501 - Q1C 27 C501 - Q1C - Complete 15 C501 - Q1C - S1/3 - The smaller the swathe narrows impact on neighbouring areas 3 C501 - Q1C - S2/3 - I feel that this system will bring total misery to those on the ground 2 C501 - Q1C - S3/3 - NPR swathes should not be changed 9 C501 - Q2A 12 C501 - Q2A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to Surrey and Kent areas 12 C501 - Q3A 2 C501 - Q3A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to East Grinstead area 2 C501 - Q1E 2 C501 - Q1E - S7/7 - Complete 1 C501 - Q1E - S1/7 - No new NPRs over areas not previously flown over. 1 C502 9 C502 - Complete 3 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick. 6 C502 - S2/3 - Arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 6 C502 - S3/3 - In favour of a respite option for night flights, again across a broad swathe area 1 C504 - Q1C 4 C504 - Q1A - S1/1 - Complete - I believe that as these proposals are not relevant to our area, they are best responded to by those affected 4 C504 - Q2A 4 C504 - Q2A - S4/4 - Complete 4 C504 - Q2C 374 C504 - Q2C - S1/1 - Complete - I support the most practical width that causes the least disturbance to those being overflown 374 C504 - Q2D 1 C504 - Q2D - S3/3 - Complete 1 C504 - Q9 1 C504 - Q9 - S1 / x26 - Specific Point Merge arrival corridors were not shown in the original consultation documentation 1 C504 - Q9 - S2 / x26 - nor was there any room for debate: only the existing broad swathes were shown 1 C504 - Q9 - S3 / x26 - The original consultation process made it clear that GAL was not going to publish the flight paths from Point Merge 1 C504 - Q9 - S4 / x26 - The follow-up consultation dated 1 May 2014, to which I am now responding, also fails to give me the opportunity to address this issue, as there is no specific question on this point 1 C504 - Q9 - S5 / x26 - I therefore question the fairness of the consultation , and whether it can on any analysis be considered a true consultation process 1 C504 - Q9 - S6 / x26 - The proposed concentrated flight path approaching Runway26 from Point Merge has been positioned so that it overflies ‘noise sensitive areas,’ 1 C504 - Q9 - S7 / x26 - in particular the village primary schools of Bidborough, Langton Green, Speldhurst, Fordcombe, Penshurst, Chiddingstone and Hever 1 CONCERNS / GENERAL 144 Minimum possible width 3 < 500 meters 5 1.5 kilometres 1 >2 kilometres 9 3 kilometres / as present 16 >3 kilometres 2 4 kilometres 2 5 kilometres 10 10 kilometres 1 Between 10 - 20 kilometres 4 20 kilometres 3 >20 kilometres 2 As wide as possible / maximum width 49 Concerns about aircraft not following flight paths / staying within NPRs 2 Concerns about the altitude / height of aircraft / flights (Net) 7 Concerns about altitude / height of aircraft / flights 6 Concerns about altitude / height of aircraft / flights over Nutfield / South Nutfield 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs (Net) 7 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs 4 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs over AONBs / countryside / rural areas 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs over Penshurst 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs over Warnham 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 2 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over South Holmwood 1 Impact 32 Concerns about the impact of narrow swathes / planes routed along a centreline 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / aircraft noise 10 Concerns about the impact on communities / residential areas 5 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 8 Concerns about the impact on Horsham 1 Concerns about the impact on Rusper 1 Concerns about the impact on Warnham 1 Concerns about the impact on the quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 11 Concerns about the impact to air quality / pollution / emissions etc 4 Concerns about profit being put before people / changes are for the benefit of GAL / shareholders only 4 PBN / modern navigational methods mean navigation has improved / could be improved 6 Width of NPR swathe is irrelevant / immaterial / not important 3 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 30 Flight paths 14 Flight paths / NPRs should achieve / fly at a greater altitude (before turning( 2 Flight paths / NPRs should comply with government environmental policy / EC Directives 2 Flight paths should avoid Bletchingley 1 Flight paths should avoid Earlswood 1 Flight paths should avoid Godstone 1 Flight paths should avoid Holmwood 1 Flight paths should avoid Horsham 1 Flight paths should avoid Langton Green 1 Flight paths should avoid Redhill 1 Flight paths should avoid Reigate 1 Flight paths should avoid Nutfield / South Nutfield 1 Flight paths should avoid Tonbridge 1 Flight paths should avoid Tunbridge Wells 2 Flight paths should avoid residential / populated areas / stay over countryside / open areas 4 Flight paths should avoid rural areas / countryside / stay over areas with existing high background noise 1 Noise / disruption / disturbance should be spread / dispersed over a wide area 2 Noise / disruption / disturbance should be reduced / minimised 3 Multiple routes should be provided to spread the disruption / provide respite 13 SUPPORT 90 Support flight paths that create least possible noise / disruption / impact fewest people 17 Support narrow NPR swathes 1 Support narrow NPR swathes / fewer people disrupted / impacted by noise 4 Support option that means least noise / disruption / impact to fewest people 3 Support respite / restrictions on night time flights 4

Support wide NPR swathes / means disturbance / noise is dispersed / spread over a wider area / is fairer 43 Support wide NPR swathes / means multiple routes within NPR to offer respite 10 Support wide NPR swathes 16 OPPOSE 121 Oppose changes to flight paths / routes / NPR swathes / no new flight paths / no new NPRs 80 Oppose changes to flight paths / routes / NPR swathes until more research has been carried out 7 Oppose flight path trials / return to pre-ADNID / pre-February trial flight path / routes 12 Oppose flight paths / NPRs over previously unaffected areas 1 Oppose increases in frequency / volume of flights / air traffic 7 Oppose increases in noise / additional aircraft noise 9 Oppose narrow NPR swathes 8 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / unfair / will increase / concentrate noise / disruption / impact on those directly beneath them 19 Oppose night flights / early morning flights / no night flights 1 Oppose single route / NPR 1 Oppose wider NPR swathes / means disruption / noise is dispersed / spread / shared over a wider area / more people suffer 2 MISCELLANEOUS 57 I am not / will be be affected by this proposal 26 See previous 22 Other (misc) 10 None of these 475 Don't know 761 Base size: 1163 Q.2d If you have answered question 2c, what were the reasons for your choice? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 245 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 402 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 387 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 174 NPR swathes affect tourism 146 None of these 22 Don't know 39 Others answers 589 CAMPAIGN / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGN 386 C501 - Q1C 1 C501 - Q1C - S3/3 - NPR swathes should not be changed 1 C501 - Q1E 1 C501 - Q1E - S3/7 - The noise contours do not cover a wide enough area that is already affected by plane noise 1 C501 - Q2C 9 C501 - Q2A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to Surrey and Kent areas 9 C502 9 C502 - Complete 3 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 6 C502 - S2/3 - Centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 5 C504 - Q1D 5 C504 - Q1D - S1/1 - Complete - I believe that as these proposals are not relevant to our area, they are best responded to by those affected 5 C504 - Q2C 1 C504 - Q2C - S1/1 - Complete - I support the most practical width that causes the least disturbance to those being overflown 1 C504 - Q2D 361 C504 - Q2D - Complete 305 C504 - Q2D - S1/3 - My support for this swathe is directly linked to the fact that there will be no increase in the population that are affected and no increased intensity of over-flying for any population 41 C504 - Q2D - S2/3 - Conversely, there will in fact be a decrease in the nuisance caused 12 C504 - Q2D - S3/3 - It is my submission that this fundamental principle (the need to ensure that there is no increase in the populations overflown or the intensity of over-flying on any population) should be central to any of the proposals 18 C504 - Q9 1 C504 - Q9 - S17 / x26 - I strongly advocate a policy of spreading the load over many routes so there are no big losers 1 CONCERNS / GENERAL 76 Noise 29 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Bletchingley and Godstone 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Earlswood 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Redhill 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise 15 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise at night 3 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise during the daytime 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Edenbridge 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Reigate 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Tunbridge Wells 2 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over previously unaffected areas 4 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise on more people 1 Concerns about the impact of noise of air traffic from Heathrow / / other airports 1 Concerns about flight path trials / return to pre-February 2014 ADNID trial flight path 7 Concerns about flight paths 2 Concerns about profit being put before people / changes are for the benefit of GAL / shareholders only 7 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft 7 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 7 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights 7 Impact 48 Concerns about the impact on air quality / pollution / emissions 1 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 1 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 16 Concerns about the impact to livelihoods / local businesses / tourist industry 4 Concerns about the impact on quality of life / health and well being / sleep 19 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / countryside / farmland / AONB 3 Concerns about the impact on those directly beneath flight path / NPR 4 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 8 People bought property cheaply knowing they were near an airport / flight path / subject to noise 1 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 31 Should ensure any changes are within the existing NPRs 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid New Domewood 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Furnace 1 Should be multiple routes / many routes to provide respite 8 Should comply with government / EU environmental policy 1 Should agree NPRs among / balance the needs of Gatwick / CAA / DfT / local communities 1 Should enforce NPRs / ensure aircraft stay within NPR 3 Should increase the altitude of the NPR to above 6000 / 7000ft 1

Should exploit modern technology to minimise disturbance / reduce noise / frequency / increase efficiency 2 Should make compensation available to people affected by changes to flight paths 1 Should reduce night flights 1 Should reduce noise / minimise impact of noise 7 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Billingshurst 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Warnham 1 Other Alternative Suggestion 1 SUPPORT 44 Support correction of NPR swathes / should accurately indicate impact of noise 1 Support narrow NPRs / PBN 4 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN means a smaller area / fewer people are disturbed / impacted by noise 1 Support new technology / PBN being used to define NPRs 1 Support shortened NPRs / reduce / minimise the area of impact 2 Support wide swathes 7 Support wide NPR swathes / disperse noise / spread disturbance over a wider area / are fairer 26 Support wide NPR swathes / allows for multiple routes / provides respite 3 OPPOSE 74 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes / many people will be impacted / no new NPRs / no new flight paths 8 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes 26 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights / additional flights 10 Oppose increases to noise / additional aircraft noise 11 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN 5 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / are unfair / cause misery affect the quality of life / health / well being of those directly beneath 9 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / on the ground 12 Oppose the proposed single entry / point merge flight control system 1 Oppose new flight paths / NPRs 1 Oppose night time / early morning flights 1 Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb at full throttle / create more disturbance / noise on the ground 1 Other Oppose 2 MISCELLANEOUS 54 Mentions of a Superhighway / motorway in the sky 2 Further research / investigation / additional information needed 6 Response contains technical data regarding noise / measurement of noise 1 Mentions of developing other airports / building a new airport / airport in Thames Estuary 1 Consultation is flawed / it divides communities 1 I am not / will not be affected by this proposal 19 See previous response 23 Other (misc) 1 Base size: 233 Q.2e What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for the realignment for RWY08 departures to the east/north east? Q2EE - RWY08 - DEPARTURES HEADING EAST / NORTH EAST 233 Support RWY08 departures option / is a good idea / would be welcomed 18 Oppose / against RWY08 departure option heading East / North East 44 I am not affected by RWY08 departures / departures heading East / North East / listen to views of those affected 123 Positive comments 14 Proposed RWY08 departures option will not affect more / people 1 Proposed RWY08 departures will mean the effect on Sevenoaks is reduced 3 Proposed RWY08 departures will mean the effect on Tonbridge is reduced 1 Proposed RWY08 SAM / KENNET route will affect fewer people than currently 6 Proposed RWY08 SAM / KENNET route will avoid countryside / rural areas / AONB 2 Proposed RWY08 SAM / KENNET route will create less noise disturbance than currently 3 Proposed RWY08 LAM route changes would benefit elevated locations 1 Proposed RWY08 LAM route changes would benefit countryside / rural areas / AONB 3 Negative comments 51 Concerns about the impact to properties for the RWY08 departures 2 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures 12 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on East Grinstead 4 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on Horsham 3 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on Penshurst 2 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on Sevenoaks Weald 2 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on Tunbridge Wells 4 Concerns about the impact to the community for RWY08 departures 9 Concern sharp turn for RWY08 departure route will force planes westwards / northwards 3 Proposed RWY08 departures will not affect fewer people 2 Proposed RWY08 departures will negatively impact quality of life / health and well being / sleep 6 Proposed narrow RWY08 departures swathe will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground 4 RWY08 SAM / KENET NPR swathe is having a negative impact on previously unaffected areas 1 Alternative suggestions 17 RWY08 LAM departures should be routed south / east 8 RWY08 LAM departures should adhere to the NPR 2 RWY08 LAM departures should be routed further north to avoid Tonbridge 2 RWY08 LAM departures should be routed further north to avoid Penshurst 1 RWY08 LAM departures should follow RWY08 DVR / BIG / CLN for longer 2 RWY08 LAM departures should use the existing route between Oxted and Edenbridge 1 RWY08 SAM / KENET route should have fewer flights 1 RWY08 SAM / KENET route should move further South 2 RWY08 SFD departures should stay with NPR / avoid East Grinstead 2 Base size: 2462 Q.3a Should Gatwick Airport Limited seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY26 could be implemented (as shown in Map 34 and Map 35)? Yes – definitely 260 Yes – probably 207 No – probably not 123 No – definitely not 991 Don’t know 881 Yes 467 No 1114 Net yes -647 Base size: 2430 Q.3b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Ltd to consider when determining whether to seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY26 could be implemented? Noise in the day that impacts my quality of life 1047 Noise at night that disturbs my sleep 1673 Noise in the day that affects my business or company /the business or company within which I work 189 Noise at night that affects my business or company / the business or company within which I work 179 Noise in the day that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 382 Noise at night that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 540 Noise over the countryside in the daytime 716 Noise over the countryside at night 1156 Noise over populated areas in the daytime 750 Noise over populated areas at night 1362 Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks 726 Noise impacts my health 1155 Potential noise impact on house prices 980 Potential noise impact on local tourism 403 Other answers 1043 CAMPAIGNS / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGNS 377 C501 - CAGNE 17 C501 - Q2A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to Surrey and Kent areas 2 C501 - Q3A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to East Grinstead 15 C502 - KENT COUNTY COUNCIL - PENSHURST PARISH COUNCIL 16 C502 - Complete 6 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 4 C502 - S2/3 - To centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 5 C502 - S3/3 - In favour of a respite option for night flights, again across a broad swathe area 5 C504 - CAGNE EAST 344 C504 - Q1B 1 C504 - Q1B - S1/1 - Complete - I believe that as these proposals are not relevant to our area, they are best responded to by those affected 1 C504 - Q2D 1 C504 - Q2D - S3/3 - Complete 1 C504 - Q3A 13 C504 - Q3A - Complete 11 C504 - Q3A - S1/3 - I do not consider that a single respite route is appropriate 2 C504 - Q3A - S2/3 - My position is that a multi respite should be given priority through a tactically vectored broad swathe approach, as is currently operational 1 C504 - Q3B 335 C504 - Q3B - Complete 312 C504 - Q3B - S1/2 - These changes should only be considered if they form part of a multi respite path option day and night across a broad swathe, as is currently operational 23 CONCERNS / GENERAL 143 All of the above needs to be considered 11 Concerns about the altitude of flights / low flights (Net) 9 Concerns about altitude of flights / low flights 8 Concerns about altitude of flights over AONB 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths 11 Concerns about flight paths / flight path trials 4 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over AONB/ areas enjoyed recreationally 4 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Tonbridge 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Warnham 2 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights (Net) 10 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights 8 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Tunbridge Wells 1 Concerns about night flights / early morning flights / respite is essential 35 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise (Net) 46 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise 28 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over peaceful / tranquil areas 2 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over rural areas / countryside 7 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over areas of historic / cultural importance 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 1 Noise affects / impacts countryside / rural areas more than urban / built up areas 3 Noise affects / impacts / wakes people early in the morning / keeps people awake late at night / affects sleep 7 Concerns about people who purchased property to avoid noise / will be affected / now affected by noise 8 Concerns about profit being put before people / benefits only GAL 8 Respite 2 Concerns about respite routes over Tonbridge 1 Concerns about respite routes over Tunbridge Wells 1 Concerns about respite routes over 1 Concerns about impact 56 Concerns about the impact of arrivals 2 Concerns about the impact on children / young people 2 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 6 Concerns about the impact on community facilities 1 Concerns about the impact on Cowden 1 Concerns about the impact of departures 1 Concerns about the impact on Dorking 1 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 1 Concerns about the impact on Hever / Hever Castle 1 Concerns about the impact on local businesses / tourist attractions 3 Concerns about the impact on local roads / transport infrastructure 1 Concerns about the impact on previously unaffected areas / people 9 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / the countryside 4 Concerns about the impact on Tonbridge 1 Concerns about the impact on the environment 1 Concerns about the impact on Wisborough Green 1 Concerns about the impact to the quality of life / health & well being / sleep 23 Concerns about the impact to air quality / pollution / emissions / fuel discharge 13 Unfair favouritism toward Hever 1 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 18 Aircraft should be quieter 3 Change should impact the least number of people 1 Flights should avoid / be reduced over populated / residential areas / 4 Flights should not turn to begin descent below 3000 ft 1 Flight paths should avoid populated areas / be routed over field / countryside 1 Frequency / volume of flights should be reduced 2 Gatwick airport activity should comply with government environmental policy / EC directives 1 Impacts should be reduced / minimised 1 Noise should be reduced / no increase in aircraft noise 4 Noise should be spread over as wide an area as possible / spread / share the burden of noise 1 Respite should be provided for Penshurst 1 SUPPORT 25 Support respite for night time / day time / multiple routes for respite 8 Support steeper approach / descent for arrivals 1 Support shortened NPRs / means aircraft can attain 4000 ft sooner / reduce noise on the ground 1 Support variable swathes 1 Support wide / broad NPR swathes 1 Support wide / broad NPR swathes / disperse noise / disturbance over a wider area / are fairer / provide respite 14 OPPOSE 74 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / no new flight paths / NPRs 28 Oppose changes to DfT noise abatement requirements 7 Oppose flight path trials / return to pre-trial / ADNID trial flight paths 7 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights 5 Oppose narrow flight path / swathe / centreline concentrates noise / disturbance / is unfair 8 Oppose the proposed single entry / point merge flight control system 1 Oppose night / early morning flights / no additional night time flights 25 Oppose PBN / narrow flight path / swathe 1 Oppose night time respite proposals / changes to night time respite 3 MISCELLANEOUS 52 More research / analysis / investigation / evaluation needs to be carried out / made public 1 Possible duplicate response (possible campaign( 2 I am / we are not affected by this proposal 27 See previous response 17 Other (misc) 5 None of these 60 Don't know 369 Base size: 209 Q.3c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY26 could be implemented? Q3C - RWY26 - ARRIVALS - NIGHT TIME RESPITE 209 I am unsure of what night time respite for RWY26 arrivals would achieve 1 I am not affected by RWY26 arrivals / listen to views of those affected 48 Oppose - Proposed RWY26 arrivals options 33 Oppose - Proposed RWY26 arrivals night time respite options 19 Support - Proposed RWY26 arrivals options 4 Support - Proposed RWY26 arrivals night time respite options 18 Positive comments 5 Conditional support for proposed options for RWY26 arrivals night time respite 5 Negative comments 76 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals 19 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals on Langton Green 5 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals on Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals on Speldhurst 1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals on Tunbridge Wells 2 Existing RWY26 arrivals are negatively impacting my area 6 Proposed narrow RWY26 arrivals swathe will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground 15 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for my area 11 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Bidborough 1 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Chiddingstone 2 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Crowborough 3 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Eridge Green 1 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Fordcombe 5 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Groombridge 3 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Hever / Hever Castle 4 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Langton 5 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Southborough 1 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Penshurst 9 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Tonbridge 1 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Tunbridge Wells 4 Proposed RWY26 arrivals will negatively impact quality of life / health and well being / sleep 1 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will mean more people will be affected 6 Proposed RWY26 respite option flies over / will negatively impact East Grinstead 1 Proposed RWY26 respite option is inadequate / result is minimal 2 Proposed RWY26 respite option will increase aircraft noise 2 Proposed RWY26 respite option will route flights closer to my home 1 Existing Situation 1 Existing RWY26 arrivals are negatively impacting Langton Green 1 Alternative suggestions 44 Day time respite from RWY26 should be given to AONB 1 Day time respite from RWY26 should be given to Hever 1 Day time respite from RWY26 should be given to Penshurst 3 Night time respite from RWY26 should be extended into the daytime 8 Night time respite from RWY26 should be given to AONB 1 Night time respite from RWY26 should be given to Edenbridge 1 Night time respite from RWY26 should be given to Four Elms 1 Night time respite from RWY26 should be given to Hever 6 Night time respite from RWY26 should be given to Tonbridge 3 Night time respite from RWY26 should be given to Penshurst 5 RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs should be moved further West 1 RWY26 arrivals should avoid Tonbridge 1 RWY26 arrivals should avoid residential / populated areas 2 RWY26 arrivals should avoid Crowborough 2 RWY26 arrivals should be routed North East of Tonbridge 2 RWY26 arrivals should be routed through Romney Marsh 1 RWY26 arrivals should be spread as widely as possible / to disperse / not concentrate negative impact 23 RWY26 arrivals should have a steeper approach / steeper descent 3 RWY26 arrivals should turn before / to the West of Edenbridge 2 RWY26 arrivals should increase approaches from the North East 1 RWY26 arrivals should decrease approaches from the South 2 Base size: 2569 Q.4a Should Gatwick Airport Limited seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY08 could be implemented (as shown in Map 38 and Map 39)? Yes – definitely 199 Yes – probably 114 No – probably not 92 No – definitely not 1099 Don’t know 1065 Yes 313 No 1191 Net yes -878 Base size: 2560 Q.4b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining whether to seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY08 could be implemented? Noise in the day that impacts my quality of life 996 Noise at night that disturbs my sleep 1660 Noise in the day that affects my business or company /the business or company within which I work 182 Noise at night that affects my business or company / the business or company within which I work 191 Noise in the day that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 324 Noise at night that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 499 Noise over the countryside in the daytime 636 Noise over the countryside at night 881 Noise over populated areas in the daytime 720 Noise over populated areas at night 1365 Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks 611 Noise impacts my health 1240 Potential noise impact on house prices 1280 Potential noise impact on local tourism 369 Other answers 878 CAMPAIGNS / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGNS 317 C501 - CAGNE 1 C501 - Q2A - S1/1 - Complete - This refers to Surrey and Kent areas 1 C502 - KENT COUNTY COUNCIL - PENSHURST PARISH COUNCIL 14 C502 - Complete 5 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 3 C502 - S2/3 - To centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 4 C502 - S3/3 - In favour of a respite option for night flights, again across a broad swathe area 6 C504 - CAGNE EAST 302 C504 - Q2D 1 C504 - Q2D - S3/3 - It is my submission that this fundamental principle (the need to ensure that there is no increase in the populations overflown or the intensity of over-flying on any population) should be central to any of the proposals 1 C504 - Q3C 2 C504 - Q3C - S2/2 - Complete 2 C504 - Q4B 299 C504 - Q4B - S1/1 - Complete - Are not relevant to our area and are best dealt with by those affected 299 CONCERNS / GENERAL 85 All of the above needs to be considered 7 Concerns about the altitude of flights / low flights (Net) 5 Concerns about altitude of flights / low flights 4 Concerns about altitude of flights over Crowborough 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths 9 Concerns about flight paths / flight path trials 2 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over AONB/ areas enjoyed recreationally 4 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over 1 Concerns about flight paths / flight paths over Warnham 2 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights (Net) 4 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights 3 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Tonbridge 1 Concerns about night flights / early morning flights / respite is essential 7 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise (Net) 35 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise 19 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over peaceful / tranquil areas 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over rural areas / countryside 6 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Loxwood 1 Concerns about noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 2 Noise affects / impacts countryside / rural areas more than urban / built up areas 3 Noise affects / impacts / wakes people early in the morning / keeps people awake late at night / affects sleep 6 Concerns about people who purchased property to avoid noise / will be affected / now affected by noise 3 Concerns about profit being put before people / benefits only GAL 1 Concerns about safety 1 Concerns about impact 39 Concerns about the impact of arrivals 2 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 4 Concerns about the impact on community facilities 1 Concerns about the impact of departures 1 Concerns about the impact on Dorking 1 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 1 Concerns about the impact on Hever / Hever Castle 1 Concerns about the impact on housing / proposed housing sites 1 Concerns about the impact on Kirdford 1 Concerns about the impact on local businesses / tourist attractions 2 Concerns about the impact on local roads / transport infrastructure 1 Concerns about the impact on previously unaffected areas / people 1 Concerns about the impact on Plaistow 1 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / the countryside 3 Concerns about the impact on the environment 2 Concerns about the impact to the quality of life / health & well being / sleep 13 Concerns about the impact to air quality / pollution / emissions / fuel discharge 14 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 9 Aircraft should be quieter 1 Flights should not turn to begin descent below 3000 ft 1 Frequency / volume of flights should be reduced 2 Gatwick airport activity should comply with government environmental policy / EC directives 1 Noise should be reduced / no increase in aircraft noise 3 Respite should be provided for Loxwood 1 SUPPORT 15 Support respite for night time / day time / multiple routes for respite 6 Support wide / broad NPR swathes / disperse noise / disturbance over a wider area / are fairer / provide respite 9 OPPOSE 68 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / no new flight paths / NPRs 25 Oppose changes to DfT noise abatement requirements 1 Oppose flight path trials / return to pre-trial / ADNID trial flight paths 6 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights 4 Oppose narrow flight path / swathe / centreline concentrates noise / disturbance / is unfair 6 Oppose night / early morning flights / no additional night time flights 26 Oppose PBN / narrow flight path / swathe 2 Oppose night time respite proposals / changes to night time respite 5 MISCELLANEOUS 57 Possible duplicate response (possible campaign( 2 I am / we are not affected by this proposal 32 See previous response 21 Other (misc) 2 None of these 50 Don't know 321 Base size: 213 Q.4c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY08 could be implemented? Q4C - RWY08 - ARRIVALS - NIGHT TIME RESPITE 213 I am not affected by RWY08 arrivals / listen to views of those affected 61 Support - Changes to current DfT noise abatement requirements 9 Support - Changes to current DfT noise abatement requirements (conditional( 5 Support - Proposed RWY08 arrivals options 6 Support - Proposed RWY08 arrivals night time respite options 14 Oppose - Changes to current DfT noise abatement requirements 39 Oppose - Proposed RWY08 arrivals options 26 Oppose - Proposed RWY08 arrivals night time respite options 14 Positive comments 4 RWY08 new flight paths / NPRs should provide respite for local residents 4 Negative comments 53 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals 15 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals on East Grinstead 3 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals on Ifold 2 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals on Loxwood / Alfolds 5 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals on Rusper 2 Proposed respite route will mean more people will be affected / negatively impacted 5 Proposed respite route will mean more people will be affected / negatively impacted by noise 1 Proposed respite route will mean more people will be affected / negatively impacted by poor air quality / pollution 1 Proposed RWY08 arrivals flight paths / NPRs are unnecessary / not needed 8 Proposed RWY08 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts on local area 2 Proposed RWY08 arrivals will negatively impact quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 11 Proposed RWY08 arrivals option will have a negative impact on flight times 2 Proposed RWY08 arrivals option will have negative impact on fuel costs 1 Proposed RWY08 respite option is inadequate / result is minimal 8 Proposed RWY08 respite route flies directly over / will negatively impact Billingshurst 3 Existing Situation 3 Existing RWY08 arrivals are negatively impacting Alfold 1 Existing RWY08 arrivals are increasing / have increased / have got worse recently 2 Alternative suggestions 23 Proposed RWY08 respite option should be extended into the daytime 3 RWY08 arrivals should avoid populated / residential areas / Horsham 2 RWY08 arrivals should avoid populated / residential areas 7 RWY08 arrivals should be spread as widely as possible / to disperse / not concentrate negative impact 8 RWY08 arrivals should have a steeper approach / steeper descent 5 Base size: 2695 Q.5a Should Gatwick Airport Limited re-centre and narrow the published NPRs to take account of aircraft performance on the modern PBN routes in place at Gatwick Airport? Yes – definitely 166 Yes – probably 185 No – probably not 170 No – definitely not 1715 Don’t know 459 Yes 351 No 1885 Net yes -1534 Base size: 2610 Q.5b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider with respect to re-centering and narrowing published NPRs to take into account aircraft performance on the modern PBN routes? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 483 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 1277 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 1364 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 446 NPR swathes affect tourism 354 None of these 91 Don't know 260 Others answers 348 CAMPAIGN / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGN 31 C501 - Q1E 3 C501 - Q1E - S3/7 - The noise contours do not cover a wide enough area that is already affected by plane noise 2 C501 - Q1E - S6/7 - The noise is unbearable for those below 1 C502 17 C502 - Complete 10 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 7 C502 - S2/3 - Centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 6 C504 - Q5A 12 C504 - Q5A - S2 / 2 - Complete 11 C504 - Q5A - S2 / 2 - However, if the narrowing of NPRs could lead to a higher concentration of noise for a minority of residents, GAL should NOT go ahead. 1 C504 - Q6B 4 C504 - Q6B - S1/1 - Complete - Although I am not in agreement with the proposal on balance, NPR swathes should always indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 4 CONCERNS / GENERAL 147 Noise 50 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise 22 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise at night 2 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise during the daytime 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Betchworth 2 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Billingshurst 2 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Brockham 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Dorking 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Redhill 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Reigate 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Westcott 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Wiseborough Green 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over previously unaffected areas 9 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise on more people 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise on schools / hospitals / nursing homes 1 Concerns about the impact of noise of air traffic from Heathrow / Redhill aerodrome / other airports 3 Concerns about the impact of noise on the desirability / character of the area 2 Concerns about the impact of noise from aircraft turning 2 All of the above 2 Concerns about aircraft not staying / flying within (current( NPRs 1 Concerns about flight path trials / return to pre-February 2014 ADNID trial flight path 19 Concerns about flight path changes tp RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR 3 Concerns about profit being put before people / changes are for the benefit of GAL / shareholders only 8 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft 2 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures over Sevenoaks) 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 13 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights 6 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Brockham 2 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Earlswood 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Sevenoaks 2 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Tonbridge 1 Concerns about the assumption of a causal link between PBN, navigation accuracy and noise reduction 1 Impact 95 Concerns about the impact on air quality / pollution / emissions 6 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 1 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations like Crowborough 1 Concerns about the impact on the environment 7 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 18 Concerns about the impact on local infrastructure / community facilities 1 Concerns about the impact to livelihoods / local businesses / tourist industry 6 Concerns about the impact on quality of life / health and well being / sleep 49 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / countryside / farmland / AONB 15 Concerns about the impact on wildlife / diversity 1 Concerns about the impact on those directly beneath flight path / NPR 5 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 17 Concerns about the impact on property 1 Concerns about weather conditions / wind direction 1 People bought property cheaply knowing they were near an airport / flight path / subject to noise 3 Other concerns 1 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 48 Concerns about the impact to historical / cultural / heritage sites / Grade I / II listed buildings 1 Should ensure any changes are within the existing NPRs 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid New Domewood 1 Should be multiple routes / many routes to provide respite 6 Should colour code NPRs to show noise levels 1 Should agree NPRs among / balance the needs of Gatwick / CAA / DfT / local communities 1 Should enforce NPRs / ensure aircraft stay within NPR 8 Should increase the altitude of the NPR to above 6000 / 7000ft 1 Should increase the altitude at which aircraft are permitted to make turns 1

Should exploit modern technology to minimise disturbance / reduce noise / frequency / increase efficiency 3 Should use modern / quieter aircraft 3 Should require airlines to pay additional taxes / be fined for using old noisier planes 1 Should make compensation available to people affected by changes to flight paths 4 Should reduce night flights 1 Should reduce frequency / volume of flights 3 Should reduce noise / minimise impact of noise 5 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid AONB / countryside / rural areas 4 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid built up / residential areas 3 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Billingshurst 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Leigh / fly south of Leigh 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Redhill (AG( 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Reigate (AG( 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Warnham 2 SUPPORT 51 Support narrow NPRs / PBN 8 Support night time respite / many routes to disperse impact 1 Support respite / restrictions on night time activity 3 Support shortened NPRs (conditional( 1 Support shortened NPRs / reduce / minimise the impact from noise 1 Support variable swathes 4 Support wide swathes 2 Support wide NPR swathes / disperse noise / spread disturbance over a wider area / are fairer 34 Support wide NPR swathes / allows for multiple routes / provides respite 4 Support for CDA/ continuous descent 1 OPPOSE 153 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes / many people will be impacted / no new NPRs / no new flight paths 20 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes 45 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights / additional flights 10 Oppose increases to noise / additional aircraft noise 7 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN 17 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / are unfair / cause misery affect the quality of life / health / well being of those directly beneath 17 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / will cause economic damage to those directly beneath 1 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / on the ground 37 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / will increase pollution / impact air quality for those directly beneath / on the ground 2 Oppose new flight paths / NPRs 4 Oppose night time / early morning flights 1 Oppose re-centering NPRs 12 Oppose variable swathes 1 Oppose wide / wider NPRs 1 Oppose wide / wider NPRs will affect quality of life / health / well being / sleep 1 Other Oppose 1 MISCELLANEOUS 26 Further research / investigation / additional information needed 8 Response contains technical data regarding noise / measurement of noise 1 Mentions of developing other airports / building a new airport / airport in Thames Estuary 1 I am not / will not be affected by this proposal 3 See previous response 13 Base size: 610 Q.5c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider re-centring and narrowing published NPRs to take into account aircraft performance on the modern PBN routes (please provide any views you have on what the optimal width for NPR swathes should be)? Q5C - RE-CENTERING / NARROWING EXISTING NPR 610 I am not affected by narrowing of NPRs / listen to those affected 1 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN is a bad idea / would not be welcomed 189 Oppose re-centring / realignment of NPR 24 Oppose wide / widened NPR swathes is a bad idea / would not be welcomed 12 Support narrow NPR swathes / PBN is a good idea / seems sensible / would be welcomed 39 Support narrow NPR swathes / PBN is a good idea / seems sensible / would be welcomed (conditional) 22 Positive comments 25 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN would benefit Capel 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN means a smaller area / fewer people are disturbed / impacted by noise 24 Negative comments 323 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN means more people are disturbed / impacted by noise 11 Adverse weather conditions will necessitate wide NPR swathes 3 Modern technology is capable of maintaining the existing 'broad swathe' policy 11 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on noise sensitive areas below 7 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on the countryside / rural areas / AONBs 7 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on the quality of life / health and well being of those directly beneath 115 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on village schools beneath 15 Noise 193 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Betchworth 3 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath 165 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Bexhill 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Bidborough 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Brockham 2 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Chiddingstone 3 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Crowborough 3 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Coldharbour 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Earlswood 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in East Grinstead 3 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Fordcombe 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Groombridge 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Hever 3 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Holmwood 2 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Ifold 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Kingsfold 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Leigh 2 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Langton Green 5 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Leith 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Markbeech 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Penshurst 5 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Redhill 2 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Reigate 2 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Southborough 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Speldhurst 3 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Tonbridge 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Tunbridge Wells 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Wisborough Green 1

Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground 30 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground (arrivals) 7 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground (RWY08 arrivals) 4 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will not work as aircraft do not follow flight paths / adhere to NPRs 16 The width of the NPR / swathe will not make much difference 7 Alternative Suggestions 313 New PBN departure routes should be introduced within existing NPRs 13 NPR swathes should be limited to 1000 metres 3 NPR swathes should be narrower to condense / contain disruption in a smaller area 8 NPR swathes should not be narrowed unless multiple routes are introduced to provide respite 14 NPR swathes should only be narrowed after more evidence is provided 15 NPR swathes should only be narrowed at an increased altitude 1 NPR swathes should be wider / as wide as possible to cover a greater area / benefit more people 48 NPR swathes should be wider / are fairer / they spread / disperse noise / disruption over a greater area / provide respite / contain multiple routes 259 Base size: 2673 Q.6a Should Gatwick Airport Limited implement shortened NPRs to take account of the observed climb performance of the flights at Gatwick Airport? Yes – definitely 229 Yes – probably 210 No – probably not 515 No – definitely not 1174 Don’t know 545 Yes 439 No 1689 Net yes -1250 Base size: 2577 Q.6b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining whether to implement shortened NPRs to take account of the observed climb performance? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 482 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 931 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 1302 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 406 NPR swathes affect tourism 333 None of these 78 Don't know 338 Others answers 615 CAMPAIGN / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGN 343 C501 - Q1E 1 C501 - Q1E - S3/7 - The noise contours do not cover a wide enough area that is already affected by plane noise 1 C502 10 C502 - Complete 6 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 4 C502 - S2/3 - Centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 4 C504 - Q6B 332 C504 - Q6B - S1/1 - Complete - Although I am not in agreement with the proposal on balance, NPR swathes should always indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 332 CONCERNS / GENERAL 139 Noise 60 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise 45 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise at night 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Betchworth 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Billingshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Kingsfold 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Rusper 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Wiseborough Green 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over previously unaffected areas 6 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise on schools / hospitals / nursing homes 2 Concerns about the impact of noise of air traffic from Heathrow / Redhill aerodrome / other airports 3 Concerns about the impact of noise on the desirability / character of the area 2 All of the above 2 Concerns about aircraft not staying / flying within (current( NPRs 1 Concerns about flight path trials / return to pre-February 2014 ADNID trial flight path 15 Concerns about flight paths 1 Concerns about profit being put before people / changes are for the benefit of GAL / shareholders only 8 Concerns about safety / safety standards 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft 6 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 12 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights 8 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Brockham 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Earlswood 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Sevenoaks 1 Concerns about the assumption of a causal link between PBN, navigation accuracy and noise reduction 2 Impact 76 Concerns about the impact on air quality / pollution / emissions 10 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 4 Concerns about the impact on the environment 4 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 10 Concerns about the impact on local infrastructure / community facilities 2 Concerns about the impact to livelihoods / local businesses / tourist industry 2 Concerns about the impact on quality of life / health and well being / sleep 43 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / countryside / farmland / AONB 4 Concerns about the impact on wildlife / diversity 1 Concerns about the impact on the transport infrastructure / increased traffic etc 1 Concerns about the impact on those directly beneath flight path / NPR 6 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 10 Concerns about weather conditions / wind direction 1 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 34 Changes should be to older / disused flight paths / NPRs 1 Aircrafts should minimise the number of turns 1 Should ensure any changes are within the existing NPRs 1 Should be multiple routes / many routes to provide respite 4 Should enforce NPRs / ensure aircraft stay within NPR 4 Should increase the altitude of the NPR to above 4000ft 3 Should increase the altitude of the NPR to above 6000 / 7000ft 2 Should increase the altitude at which aircraft are permitted to make turns 1

Should exploit modern technology to minimise disturbance / reduce noise / frequency / increase efficiency 1 Should make compensation available to people affected by changes to flight paths 3 Should reduce night flights 1 Should reduce frequency / volume of flights 1 Should reduce noise / minimise impact of noise 3 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid AONB / countryside / rural areas 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid built up / residential areas 5 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Billingshurst 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Warnham 2 Other Alternative Suggestion 1 SUPPORT 32 Support narrow NPRs / PBN 1 Support new technology / PBN being used to define NPRs 1 Support shortened NPRs 3 Support shortened NPRs (conditional( 4 Support shortened NPRs / reduce / minimise the area of impact 3 Support shortened NPRs / reduce / minimise the impact from noise 6 Support wide swathes 1 Support wide NPR swathes / disperse noise / spread disturbance over a wider area / are fairer 17 Support wide NPR swathes / allows for multiple routes / provides respite 1 OPPOSE 103 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes / many people will be impacted / no new NPRs / no new flight paths 15 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes 32 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights / additional flights 5 Oppose increases to noise / additional aircraft noise 10 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN 3 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / are unfair / cause misery affect the quality of life / health / well being of those directly beneath 5 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / on the ground 4 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / will increase pollution / impact air quality for those directly beneath / on the ground 1 Oppose the proposed single entry / point merge flight control system 2 Oppose new flight paths / NPRs 2 Oppose night time / early morning flights 4 Oppose shortened NPRs / steeper climb creates noise 18 Oppose shortened NPRs / negatively impact quality of life for those directly beneath 2 Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb at full throttle / create more disturbance / noise on the ground 8 Oppose wide / wider NPRs will affect quality of life / health / well being / sleep 1 Other Oppose 2 MISCELLANEOUS 39 Further research / investigation / additional information needed 9 Response contains technical data regarding noise / measurement of noise 1 Mentions of developing other airports / building a new airport / airport in Thames Estuary 2 Consultation is flawed / it divides communities 1 Response asks question / requires follow up 1 See previous response 23 Other (misc) 2 Base size: 258 Q.6c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining whether to implement shortened NPRs to take account of the observed climb performance of the flights at Gatwick Airport? Q6C - SHORTENED NPRs 258 Support shortened NPRs / are a good idea / seem sensible / would be welcomed 39 Support shortened NPRs / are a good idea / seem sensible / would be welcomed (conditional) 7 Oppose shortened NPRs / are a bad idea / would not be welcomed 67 I am not affected by shortened NPRs / departures / listen to views of those affected 5 Positive comments 53 Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb quicker / create less disturbance / noise on the ground 37 Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb quicker / affect smaller area on the ground 14 Shortened NPRs will better reflect normal conditions / current rate of climb 1 Shortened NPRs would benefit / increase aircraft altitude over Felbridge 1 Shortened NPRs would benefit / increase aircraft altitude over Sevenoaks 1 Shortened NPRs would benefit / increase aircraft altitude over Tonbridge 2 Negative comments 113 Shortened NPRs will concentrate / increase emissions / pollution for those directly beneath 1 Shortened NPRs are inadequate / results are minimal 10 Shortened NPRs mean aircraft can / will change course sooner / fly over previously unaffected areas 3 Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb at full throttle / create more disturbance / noise on the ground 103 Shortened NPRs will have a negative impact on the quality of life / health and well being of those directly beneath 1 Alternative suggestions 33 NPR swathes should only be shortened after more evidence is provided 5 Shortened NPR should only be implemented over the historical NPRs 2 Shortened NPRs should only be used if noise / disturbance is reduced 20 Shortened NPRs should be enforced / ensure there is no deviation from NPR 7 Base size: 2619 Q.7a The existing PBN route for RWY26 DVR/CLN/LAM departures means that aircraft fly outside the NPR. Should Gatwick Airport Limited re-centre and narrow the published NPR to correct this Yes – definitely 733 Yes – probably 200 No – probably not 91 No – definitely not 653 Don’t know 942 Yes 933 No 744 Net yes 189 Base size: 2315 Q.7b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport to consider, with respect to correcting the published NPR for the RWY26 DVR/CLN/LAM route, so that it captures where aircraft actually fly? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 469 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 855 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 950 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 392 NPR swathes affect tourism 314 None of these 84 Don't know 481 Others answers 579 CAMPAIGN / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGN 289 C501 - Q1E 1 C501 - Q1E - S3/7 - The noise contours do not cover a wide enough area that is already affected by plane noise 1 C502 31 C502 - Complete 7 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 24 C502 - S2/3 - Centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 5 C504 - Q1D 275 C504 - Q1D - S1/1 - Complete - I believe that as these proposals are not relevant to our area, they are best responded to by those affected 275 C504 - Q6B 1 C504 - Q6B - S1/1 - Complete - Although I am not in agreement with the proposal on balance, NPR swathes should always indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 1 CONCERNS / GENERAL 115 Noise 36 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise 17 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise at night 2 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Betchworth 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Billingshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Dorking 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Reigate 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over previously unaffected areas 10 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise on more people 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise on schools / hospitals / nursing homes 1 Concerns about the impact of noise of air traffic from Heathrow / Redhill aerodrome / other airports 2 Concerns about the impact of noise on the desirability / character of the area 2 Concerns about the impact of noise from aircraft turning 2 All of the above 2 Concerns about aircraft not staying / flying within current NPRs 4 Concerns about flight path trials / return to pre-February 2014 ADNID trial flight path 18 Concerns about profit being put before people / changes are for the benefit of GAL / shareholders only 8 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft 6 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 12 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights 3 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Betchworth 3 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Brockham 2 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Earlswood 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Leigh 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over North Holmwood 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Sevenoaks 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Tunbridge Wells 1 Concerns about the assumption of a causal link between PBN, navigation accuracy and noise reduction 2 Impact 61 Concerns about the impact on air quality / pollution / emissions 7 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 2 Concerns about the impact on the environment 3 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 13 Concerns about the impact on local infrastructure / community facilities 1 Concerns about the impact on quality of life / health and well being / sleep 32 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / countryside / farmland / AONB 10 Concerns about the impact on wildlife / diversity 1 Concerns about the impact on the transport infrastructure / increased traffic etc 1 Concerns about the impact on those directly beneath flight path / NPR 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 14 Concerns about flight paths not being adhered to / aircraft straying outside of NPRs 4 Other concerns 1 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 47 Concerns about the impact to historical / cultural / heritage sites / Grade I / II listed buildings 1 Should ensure any changes are within the existing NPRs 1 Should be multiple routes / many routes to provide respite 3 Should enforce NPRs / ensure aircraft stay within NPR 15

Should exploit modern technology to minimise disturbance / reduce noise / frequency / increase efficiency 1 Should make compensation available to people affected by changes to flight paths 2 Should reduce night flights 1 Should reduce frequency / volume of flights 3 Should reduce noise / minimise impact of noise 6 Should route flight paths / NPRs further south 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid AONB / countryside / rural areas 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid built up / residential areas 3 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Billingshurst 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Leigh / fly south of Leigh 8 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Warnham 1 Other Alternative Suggestion 1 SUPPORT 34 Support correction of NPRs 2 Support correction of NPR swathes / should accurately indicate where aircraft fly 5 Support correction of NPR swathes / should accurately indicate impact of noise 2 Support narrow NPRs / PBN 1 Support new technology / PBN being used to define NPRs 1 Support variable swathes 1 Support wide swathes 3 Support wide NPR swathes / disperse noise / spread disturbance over a wider area / are fairer 17 Support wide NPR swathes / allows for multiple routes / provides respite 2 OPPOSE 85 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes / many people will be impacted / no new NPRs / no new flight paths 12 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes 42 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights / additional flights 7 Oppose increases to noise / additional aircraft noise 6 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN 4 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / are unfair / cause misery affect the quality of life / health / well being of those directly beneath 6 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / on the ground 10 Oppose new flight paths / NPRs 2 Oppose night time / early morning flights 2 Oppose re-centering NPRs 1 Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb at full throttle / create more disturbance / noise on the ground 1 Oppose wide / wider NPRs will affect quality of life / health / well being / sleep 3 Other Oppose 1 MISCELLANEOUS 91 Mentions of a Superhighway / motorway in the sky 1 Further research / investigation / additional information needed 5 Response contains technical data regarding noise / measurement of noise 1 I am not / will not be affected by this proposal 57 Response asks question / requires follow up 1 See previous response 20 Stakeholder response 1 Possible duplicate response (possible campaign 4 Other (misc) 1 Base size: 338 Q.7c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider, with respect to correcting the published NPR for the RWY26 DVR/CLN/LAM route, so that it captures where aircraft actually fly? Q7C - CORRECTING NPR FOR RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM 338 Support correction of NPRs / a good idea / seems sensible / would be welcomed 19 Oppose changes to RWY26 north / northeast bound DVR / CLN / BIG / LAM departures 63 Oppose correction of NPRs / changes to NPRs are unnecessary / not needed / leave NPRs as they are 96 I am not affected by correction of NPRs / listen to views of those affected 21 Positive comments 38 Correcting NPRs means noise impacts from aircraft are accurately published 7 Correcting NPRs means routes aircraft actually fly are accurately published 32 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has reduced fuel emissions 1 Negative comments 146 Noise 114 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in North Holmwood 1 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Strood Green 1 Concerns about lack of prior consultation on RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change 53 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise 34 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Beare Green 1 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Betchworth 17 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Brockham 16 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Capel 6 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Coldharbour 1 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Dorking 4 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Holmwood 9 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Leigh 4 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Newdigate 1 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Redhill 2 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Reigate 1 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in South Holmwood 6 Early Morning/Night Flights 45 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over Holmwood 1 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over South Holmwood 1 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased frequency / volume of flights 29 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights 9 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over Brockham 9 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over Betchworth 3 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over Leigh 2 Impact 74 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has negatively impacted countryside / rural areas / AONB 16 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has negatively impacted quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 49 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has negatively impacted the environment 2 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change is negatively impacting previously unaffected areas 21

RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change is negatively impacting previously unaffected areas like Holmwood 5 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change is negatively impacting previously unaffected areas like North Holmwood 3 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change negatively impacts more people 9 Correction of NPRs is inadequate / results are minimal 3 Alternative suggestions 62 Flight paths / NPRs should be adhered to / fine / penalise airlines that deviate from existing NPRs 33 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change should avoid populated / residential areas / should fly over countryside 5 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM departures should continue to climb before turning / turn further north 2 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM departures should turn sooner / fly further south / not as far north 9 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM route should modify PBN departures to accurately reflect the old NPR routes 16 Base size: 2572 Q.8a Should Gatwick Airport Limited consider NPR swathes with variable widths, dependant on sharpness of turns on each route, as a more accurate portrayal of where aircraft actually overfly? Yes – definitely 548 Yes – probably 455 No – probably not 109 No – definitely not 908 Don’t know 552 Yes 1003 No 1017 Net yes -14 Base size: 2494 Q.8b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited when considering NPR swathes with variable widths, dependant on sharpness of turns on each route, as a more accurate portrayal of where aircraft actually overfly? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 471 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 1257 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 1269 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 402 NPR swathes affect tourism 326 None of these 65 Don't know 325 Others answers 234 CAMPAIGN / POSSIBLE CAMPAIGN 15 C502 12 C502 - Complete 7 C502 - S1/3 - In favour of the continued use of the current broad swathe for arrivals into Gatwick 5 C502 - S2/3 - Centre arrivals along one centre line would create unfair stress on those who would be overflown 4 C504 - Q6B 3 C504 - Q6B - S1/1 - Complete - Although I am not in agreement with the proposal on balance, NPR swathes should always indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 3 CONCERNS / GENERAL 102 Noise 36 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise 19 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Betchworth 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Billingshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise over previously unaffected areas 6 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise on more people 2 Concerns about the impact of noise / additional aircraft noise on schools / hospitals / nursing homes 1 Concerns about the impact of noise of air traffic from Heathrow / Redhill aerodrome / other airports 1 Concerns about the impact of noise from aircraft turning 5 All of the above 2 Concerns about aircraft not staying / flying within (current( NPRs 3 Concerns about flight path trials / return to pre-February 2014 ADNID trial flight path 14 Concerns about profit being put before people / changes are for the benefit of GAL / shareholders only 7 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft 3 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 6 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights 2 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Betchworth 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Brockham 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Earlswood 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Leigh 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Nutfield 1 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights over Sevenoaks 1 Impact 53 Concerns about the impact on air quality / pollution / emissions 6 Concerns about the impact on elevated locations 1 Concerns about the impact on the environment 3 Concerns about the impact on communities / populated / residential areas 15 Concerns about the impact on local infrastructure / community facilities 1 Concerns about the impact on quality of life / health and well being / sleep 30 Concerns about the impact on rural areas / countryside / farmland / AONB 6 Concerns about the impact on those directly beneath flight path / NPR 3 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 4 Concerns about weather conditions / wind direction 2 Other concerns 1 ALTERNATIVE SUGGESTIONS 32 Concerns about the impact to historical / cultural / heritage sites / Grade I / II listed buildings 1 Aircrafts should minimise the number of turns 3 Should ensure any changes are within the existing NPRs 2 Should be multiple routes / many routes to provide respite 2 Should comply with government / EU environmental policy 1 Should enforce NPRs / ensure aircraft stay within NPR 8 Should increase the altitude of the NPR to above 4000ft 1 Should increase the altitude at which aircraft are permitted to make turns 1 Should reduce night flights 1 Should reduce frequency / volume of flights 1 Should reduce noise / minimise impact of noise 4 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid AONB / countryside / rural areas 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid built up / residential areas 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Billingshurst 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Redhill (AG( 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Reigate (AG( 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid East Grinstead 1 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the Surrey Hills AONB 2 Should route flight paths / NPRs to avoid Warnham 1 Other Alternative Suggestion 1 SUPPORT 42 Support correction of NPR swathes / should accurately indicate where aircraft fly 3 Support correction of NPR swathes / should accurately indicate impact of noise 2 Support narrow NPRs / PBN 2 Support respite / restrictions on night time activity 2 Support variable swathes 8 Support wide swathes 5 Support wide NPR swathes / disperse noise / spread disturbance over a wider area / are fairer 26 Support wide NPR swathes / allows for multiple routes / provides respite 2 OPPOSE 74 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes / many people will be impacted / no new NPRs / no new flight paths 7 Oppose changes to flight paths / NPRs / NPR swathes 31 Oppose increases to frequency / volume of flights / additional flights 5 Oppose increases to noise / additional aircraft noise 6 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN 7 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN / are unfair / cause misery affect the quality of life / health / well being of those directly beneath 11 Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / on the ground 8 Oppose the proposed single entry / point merge flight control system 1 Oppose new flight paths / NPRs 2 Oppose night time / early morning flights 2 Oppose variable swathes 3 Oppose wide / wider NPRs will affect quality of life / health / well being / sleep 2 MISCELLANEOUS 34 Mentions of a Superhighway / motorway in the sky 1 Further research / investigation / additional information needed 6 Response contains technical data regarding noise / measurement of noise 1 Mentions of developing other airports / building a new airport / airport in Thames Estuary 1 See previous response 17 Stakeholder response 1 Possible duplicate response (possible campaign( 4 Other (misc) 4 Base size: 126 Q.8c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about whether Gatwick Airport Limited should consider NPR swathes with variable widths as a more accurate portrayal of where aircraft actually overfly? Q8C - NPR VARIABLE WIDTHS 126 Support for variable width swathes 21 Conditional support for variable width swathes 5 I am not affected by NPR variable widths / listen to views of those affected 1 Oppose NPR swathes with variable width 43 Positive comments 65 NPR swathe widths should accurately reflect where planes overfly 36 Variable width swathes increase uncertainty 4 Variable width swathes would allow a larger turning circle for aircraft struggling with tight turns 4 Variable width swathes would disperse impacts over a wider area / population 19 Variable width swathes would mean fewer people affected by noise 5 Negative comments 5 Variable width NPRs / swathes will mean that aircraft fly over more areas / will fly over previously unaffected areas 2 Variable width NPRs / swathes will be impractical to implement 2 Variable width NPRs / swathes will increase noise / aircraft noise 1 Alternative Suggestions 4 Variable width NPRs / swathes should only be considered on specific parts of the route 2 Variable width NPRs / swathes should only be used if impacts on the community are reduced / not increased 2 Base size: 2066 Q.9 What, if any, additional comments do you have that are relevant to this consultation and that you would like to make? GENERAL DEPARTURES 105 Oppose (General departures) 82 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for departures 36 Oppose changes to frequency / volume of departures 10 Oppose new departure flight paths / NPRs / changes are unnecessary / not needed 34 Oppose additional departures / no departures over populated / residential areas 5 Alternative suggestion 26 Aircraft should increase the angle of trajectory / climb faster / as fast as possible 4 Departures should minimise the number of turns 3 Departures should be routed to the west of Crowborough 1 Noise abatement take-off profiles will become mandatory / GAL should be taking a lead on this 11 Technical suggestions - Departures 8 GENERAL ARRIVALS 127 Support (General arrivals) 1 Support / have no problem with Point Merge System 1 Oppose (General arrivals) 66 Arrivals negatively impact populated / residential areas 8 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for arrivals 20 Concerns about the impact of Standard Arrival Routes 12 Concerns about the lack of monitoring of arrivals below 4000ft 6 Frequency / volume of arrivals are negatively impacting my area 3 Oppose additional arrivals / no arrivals over populated / residential areas 8 Oppose late night arrivals after 11pm 1 Oppose new arrival flight paths / NPRs / changes are unnecessary / not needed 1 Oppose the proposed single entry / point merge flight control system 16 The Point Merge System would be unfair for those living underneath whose lives would be ruined by incessant noise 5 The Point Merge System would be unfair for those living underneath whose lives would be ruined by air pollution from the flow of planes overhead 1 Alternative suggestions (General arrivals) 80 Air braking should be avoided over residential areas 3 Arrivals holding stacks should be moved further away / elsewhere / over the sea 7 Arrivals should have a gentle approach / gentle descent 1 Arrivals should be spread as widely as possible / to disperse / not concentrate negative impact 16 Arrivals should have a steeper approach / steeper descent 36 Arrivals should maximise continuous descent approaches 13 Arrivals should minimise stepped descents 4 Arrivals should minimise the number of turns 9 Arrivals should avoid towns / villages Warnham 1 Arrivals should avoid towns / villages on the final approach 1 NPRs should apply to arrivals 1 The Point Merge System should be used off the coast but with multi-path approach routes into Gatwick 1 Technical suggestions - Arrivals 4 GENERAL NIGHT FLIGHTS / RESPITE 620 I am not affected by / do not lose sleep from night time flights / listen to views of those affected 1 Oppose a single narrow night-time respite route 12 Oppose night time respite / is a bad idea / would not be welcomed 18 Support night time respite / is a good idea / would be welcomed 35 Support respite for night time / day time / multiple routes for respite 8 Support respite / is a good idea / would be welcomed in the countryside 1 Conditional support for / limited / night time respite options 8 Support respite / is a good idea / would be welcomed 33 Oppose respite options 3 Support (General night flights/respite) 16 Night time respite would benefit Capel 1 Night time respite would benefit High Weald AONB 1 Night time respite would benefit Loxwood 1 Night time respite would benefit Tonbridge 2 Night time respite would benefit Tunbridge Wells 4 Night time respite would benefit the local community / residents 8 Respite options means fewer people are disturbed / impacted by noise 2 Oppose (General night flights/respite) 384 Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights 42 Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights over Ifold 2 Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights over Langton Green 2 Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights over Tunbridge Wells 2 Concerns about the frequency of flights at night time / early morning 33 Existing RWY26 respite option is sufficient 2 Night time / early morning flights cause light pollution 3 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact local businesses / tourist industry 1 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact populated / residential areas 1 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact property values / house prices 5 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 164 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact the environment 2 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact wildlife / biodiversity 1 Night time respite options negatively impact more people / other people 9 Oppose early morning flights / flights at 6am (or earlier( 12 Oppose night time / early morning flights / no (additional( night time flights 167 Proposals mean that Crowborough will have no respite 1 Proposals mean that Penshurst will have no respite 1 Proposals mean that Speldhurst will have no respite 1 Proposed respite options are inadequate / result is minimal 23 Proposed respite options will negatively impact properties / property values 1 Respite doesn't work / shifts the problem elsewhere / is a flawed / misleading concept 11 Existing Situation (General night flights/respite) 223 Impact of night time / early morning flights 136 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact my area 65 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Alfold 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Beare Green 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Betchworth 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Bidborough 2 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Billingshurst 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Brockham 3 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Capel 2 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Coldharbour 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Crowborough 3 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Edenbridge 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Eridge Green 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Groombridge 2 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Haywards Heath 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Holmwood 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Horsham 7 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Ifold 3 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Kingsfold 2 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Langton Green 5 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Leigh 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Mark Cross 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact North Holmwood 6 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Redhill 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Reigate 4 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Rowhook 2 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Rusper 2 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Slinfold 2 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Speldhurst 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Southborough 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact South Holmwood 4 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Tonbridge 2 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Tunbridge Wells 10 Existing frequency / volume of night time / early morning flights is increasing / has increased / has increased recently (Net) 102 Existing frequency / volume of night time / early morning flights is increasing / has increased / has increased recently 69

Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Alfold 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Betchworth 3 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Crowborough 5 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Dorking 3 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in East Grinstead 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Hadlow 1

Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Hever 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in North Holmwood 7 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Lamberhurst 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Langton Green 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Redhill 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Reigate 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Sevenoaks 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in South Holmwood 2 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Tonbridge 2 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Tunbridge Wells 3 Existing respite options are insufficient 14 Alternative suggestions (General night flights/respite) 151 Day time respite should be considered 7 Day time respite should be within current flight paths / NPRs 4

Night time / early morning flights / limits should be adhered to / fine / penalise Gatwick for exceeding limits 12 Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas 13 Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas / Crowborough 1 Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas / Edenbridge 1 Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas / Holmwood 2 Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas / Warnham 1 Night time / early morning flights should be at a higher altitude 6 Night time / early morning flights should be reduced 9 Night time / early morning flights should have more routes / more routes to provide respite 3 Night flights / night time noise / noise should be reduced / minimised at night 34 Night flights / night time noise / should ensure the minimum number of people are affected 6 Night time flights should not be between the hours of Xpm and Xam 53 Night time respite should be between Xpm and Xam 10 Respite for the day time should be included in proposed arrivals options 4 Night time respite should be within current flight paths / NPRs 7 Respite for the day time should be included in proposed departure options 2 RWY26 new flight paths / NPRs should provide respite for local residents 4 Other respite options should be considered 6 GENERAL FLIGHT PATHS / NPRs 1290 Support (General flight paths/NPRs) 41 Conditional support for changes to / new flight paths / NPRs 14 New flight paths / NPRs will reduce noise impact to local residents / community 5 Support new technology / PBN being used to define NPRs 18 Support changes to / new flight paths / NPRs 5 Oppose (General flight paths/NPRs) 885 Concerns about changes to flight path / NPRs affecting so many people 29 Concerns about flight paths affecting quality of life 457 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Alfold 5 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 352 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Ashurst 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Ashurst Wood 2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Betchworth 7 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Bidborough 2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Billingshurst 4 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Brockham 8 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Capel 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Chiddingstone 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Crowborough 16 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Earlswood 2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of East Grinstead 2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Eridge 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Fordcombe 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Groombridge 3 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Hever 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Holmwood 4 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Horsham 21 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Ifold 3 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Kingsfold 7 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Kirdford 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Langton Green 2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Leigh 4 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Lingfield 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Newdigate 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of North Holmwood 5 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Penshurst 4 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Redhill 5 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Plaistow 2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Reigate 3 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Rowhook 3 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Rusper 4 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Sevenoaks 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Slinfold 6 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Strood Green 1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Tunbridge Wells 12 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Warnham 2 Concerns about future changes to flight paths / NPRs 9 Concerns about NPRs not reflecting actual flight paths / aircraft fly outside NPRs to save fuel 14 Concerns about NPRs not reflecting the true impact of noise 51 Concerns about NPRs not reflecting actual flight paths / aircraft not adhering to NPR 54 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs (Net) 38 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs 5 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Ashdown Forest AONB 18 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Capel 1 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Crowborough 5 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Hadlow 1 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over High Weald AONB 1 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Hever 1 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Horsham 8 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Pulborough 1 Concerns about the impact of PBN routes for turning angles 8

Concerns about the impact on the local community / residents not currently impacted by flight paths / NPRs 43 Concerns about the measurement / methodology used to devise new flight paths 24 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Groombridge 1 Flight path / NPRs should be compliant with Government environmental policy / EU Directives / Health & Safety policies 15

It is misleading to seek to establish a causal link between PBN, navigation accuracy and noise reduction 2 Oppose concentrating RWY08 flights between Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells 6 Oppose changes to / new flight paths / NPRs / changes are not needed 463 Existing situations (General flight paths/NPRs) 242 Impact on quality of life 241 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of my area 103 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Betchworth 12 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Bletchingley 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Billingshurst 2 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Brockham 11 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Buckland 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Capel 3 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Coldharbour 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Chiddingstone 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Crowborough 12 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Dorking 4 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Dormansland 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Earlswood 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of East Grinstead 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Eridge Green 4 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Four Elms 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Groombridge 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Haywards Heath 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Hever 2 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Holmwood 11 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Horsham 14 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Ifold 3 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Kingsfold 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Kirdford 2 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Langton Green 4 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Leith Hill 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of North Holmwood 11 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of South Holmwood 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Nutfield 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Penshurst 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Plaistow 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Redhill 7 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Reigate 12 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Rusper 3 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of 2 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Slinfold 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Southborough 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of South Holmwood 7 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Southwater 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of the Surrey Hills AONB 2 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Tunbridge Wells 12 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Warnham 3 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Wisborough Green 2 Response contains technical data regarding flight paths / SIDs 1 Alternative suggestions (General flight paths/NPRs) 653 Any proposals for flight path changes should respect government altitude based environmental policies 2 Extending the NPR up to X,XXX ft should be considered 6 Changes should be to older / disused flight paths / NPRs 6 Flight paths / NPRs 602 Flight paths / NPRs should affect as few people as possible 17 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Ashdown Forest 9 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Beare Green 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Bidborough 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Betchworth 8 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Billingshurst 6 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Brockham 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Broadbridge Heath 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Bucks Green 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Capel 8 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Chiddingstone 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Coldharbour 3 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Copthorn 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Cranleigh 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Crawley 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Crowborough 20 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Cuckfield 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Dormansland 3 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the North Downs 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Dorking 4 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the South Downs 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Edenbridge 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid East Grinstead 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid elevated locations 14 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Eridge Green 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Five Oaks 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Groombridge 4 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Haywards Heath 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Heathfield 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Hever / Hever Castle 6 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the High Weald AONB 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Holmwood 9 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Ifold 3 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Horsham 25 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the Kent Downs AONB 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Langton Green 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Kingsfold 6 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Leigh 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Leith Hill 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Lingfield 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Loxwood 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid North Holmwood 6 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Markbeech 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Nutfield 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Penshurst 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Plaistow 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Redhill 4 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Rudgwick 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Reigate 8 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Rusper 6 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Salfords 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Seaford 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Sevenoaks 4 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Slinfold 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Southborough 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Southwater 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid South Holmwood 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Speldhurst 6 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the Surrey Hills AONB 6 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Tonbridge 10 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Tunbridge Wells 35 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Tunbridge Wells / be routed to the west of Tunbridge Wells 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Warnham 8 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Winterfold 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Wisborough Green 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Woodhatch 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid previously unaffected areas 80 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid populated / residential areas / should fly over countryside / rural areas 156 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the countryside / rural areas / should not disturb wildlife / livestock 6 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the countryside / rural areas / AONB 78 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid tranquil / quiet / peaceful areas 19 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid heritage sites 1 Flight paths / NPRs should be adhered to / enforce NPRs / ensure there is no deviation from NPR 112 Flight paths / NPRs should be increased / have more routes / more routes to provide respite 48 Flight paths / NPRs should be fully / effectively utilised (before change is considered( 6 Flight paths / NPRs to the west must be matched by flight paths / NPRs to the east 1 Flight paths / NPRs should stay over densely populated areas / areas already impacted by noise 39 Flight paths should fly over industrial areas 3 NPRs should only be changed if safety is improved 6 NPRs should only be changed if noise is reduced 11 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from overflights of nearby areas 6 Routes should only be changed within existing NPRs 60 OTHERS 1766 GENERAL AIRCRAFT 185 Concerns about older aircraft being louder / creating more noise / disturbance 22 Concerns about older aircraft being able to reach 4000 feet within shortened NPRs 11 Modern aircraft will not climb more quickly / for fuel saving / engine saving reasons 5 Existing Situation (General aircraft) 83 Aircraft performance varies too much / is not consistent / changes on a daily basis 3 Modern aircraft are capable of steeper climbs / descents 28 Modern aircraft are quieter / create less noise / disturbance 17 Modern aircraft navigate more accurately 39 Modern aircraft are not quieter / do not create less noise / disturbance 8 Smaller aircraft create more noise / disturbance / are not quieter 1 Alternative Suggestions (General aircraft) 97 Airlines should invest in quieter aircraft / fitted with noise reduction equipment / engine refinements 53 Airlines should pay additional taxes / be fined for using old noisier planes 7 Aircraft should turn at a higher altitude 20 Modern / cleaner aircraft should be used 4 Modern / quieter aircraft should be used 33 GENERAL ALTITUDE 362 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft arrivals / departures 177 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( 117 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over AONB 2 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Ashdown Forest 4 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Bidborough 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Broadbridge Heath 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Crowborough 14 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Dorking 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Groombridge 2 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Horsham 2 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Ifold 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Langton Green 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Kent Downs 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Kingsfold 6 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Penshurst 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Reigate 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Rowhook 2 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Rusper 8 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Slinfold 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Southborough 2 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Surrey Hills 3 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over the Weald 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Tunbridge Wells 16 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Tonbridge 3 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Vigo 1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Warnham 4 Existing Situation (General altitude) 211 Decreasing altitude 86 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Pulborough 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over my area 36 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Betchworth 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Bidborough 2 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Coldharbour 3 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Chiddingstone 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Crowborough 6 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Brockham 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Dormansland 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Penshurst 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Fordcombe 2 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Furnace Wood 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Holmwood 2 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Langton Green 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Leigh 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Leith Hill 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Loxwood 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Nutfield 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Redhill 3 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Reigate 3 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Sevenoaks 1 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Tonbridge 7 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Tunbridge Wells 10 Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Warnham 1 Aircraft altitude too low 145 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over my area 77 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over AONB 3 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Ashdown Forest 2 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Beare Green 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Bletchingley 2 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Chiddingstone 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Crowborough 10 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Four Elms 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Haywards Heath 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Hever 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Holmwood 3 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Horsham 5 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Earlswood 2 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Ifold 2 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Kingsfold 7 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Langton Green 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Leigh 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over North Holmwood 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Nutfield 2 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Plaistow 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Reigate 2 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Redhill 2 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Rusper 7 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Salfords 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Slinfold 1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over South Holmwood 4 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Southborough 2 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Tonbridge 3 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Tunbridge Wells 13 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Warnham 3 Alternative Suggestions (General altitude) 49 Altitude limits should be adhered to / fine / penalise Gatwick for exceeding limits 10 Flight paths / NPRs should be at a higher altitude 39 Flight paths / NPRs should be at a higher altitude over Tunbridge Wells 5 GENERAL COMMUNITY / PEOPLE 649 Concerns about changes impacting more people 55 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry 59 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry from RWY08 1 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Ashdown Forest 1 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Box Hill 1 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Brockham 2

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Chiddingstone / Chiddingstone Castle 3 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Crowborough 3 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Dorking 1 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Groombridge / Groombridge Place 9 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Hever / Hever Castle 8 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Horsham 2 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Langton Green 2 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Penshurst / Penshurst Place 11 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Rusper 3 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in South Holmwood 1 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Surrey Hills AONB 1 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Speldhurst 2 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Tunbridge Wells 5 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in the High Weald AONB 2 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Warnham 2 Criticism of Gatwick / changes are for the benefit of GAL / GAL shareholders / Airport related businesses / to increase profit 311 Concerns about the impact on future developments 4 Concerns about the impact on education / health for schools / hospitals / nursing homes etc 30 Impact on local community / schools 216 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents 161 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Ashurst 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Betchworth 7 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Bidborough 3 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Billingshurst 4 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Broadbridge Heath 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Brockham 8 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Chiddingstone 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Cowden 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Crowborough 3 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Dorking 2 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Dormansland 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Groombridge 2 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Hever 3 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in High Weald AONB 3 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Holmwood 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Horsham 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Ifold 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Kingsfold 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Langton Green 4 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Leigh 3 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in North Holmwood 7 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Penshurst 2 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Reigate 3 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Rusper 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Salfords 3 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Sevenoaks 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Southwater 2 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Speldhurst 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Stopham 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Tonbridge 2 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Tunbridge Wells 11 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Warnham 1 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Wealden AONB 1 Other impact 91

Concerns about the impact on the communication infrastructure / mobile telephone signal / reception etc 2 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of the area 35 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Crawley 1 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Crowborough 9 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Fordcombe 1 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Groombridge 2 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Hever 1 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Horsham 3 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Langton Green 1 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Penshurst 1 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Rusper 2 Concerns about the impact on the local economy / economy will not benefit 29 Concerns about the impact on the transport infrastructure of the area 19 Lack of research into the impact of these proposals on local communities / needs in depth scientific research 7 Existing Situation - Community negatively impacted 17 Existing community are negatively impacted in my area 10 Existing community are negatively impacted in Billingshurst 1 Existing community are negatively impacted in Brockham 2 Existing community are negatively impacted in Eridge Green 1 Existing community are negatively impacted in Tunbridge Wells 2 Existing community are negatively impacted in Warnham 1 Alternative Suggestions (General community/people) 128 Listen to views / opinions / complaints from the people 100 There needs to be a balance between the interests of GAL and those of the public / residents / affected by the changes 1 Disruption to communities / residents should be kept to a minimum 21 The quality of life / health and well-being of residents / communities should be the first consideration 14 GENERAL ENVIRONMENT 399 Concerns about the impact of light / visual pollution 7 Concerns about the impact to the countryside / rural areas / AONB 137 Concerns about the impact to the countryside / rural areas / AONB from RWY26 3 Concerns about the impact to the countryside / rural areas / AONB from RWY08 5 Concerns about the impact to the environment 89 Concerns about the impact to air quality / of pollution 177 Concerns about the impact to historical / cultural / heritage sites / Grade I / II listed buildings 39 Concerns about the impact to air quality / of pollution from RWY08 arrival flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact to nature reserves / national parks / SSSI / SPA etc 13 Concerns about the impact to wildlife / biodiversity 29 Existing Situation (General environment) 26 Existing countryside / rural areas / AONB have been negatively impacted 25 Proximity of the airport protects the countryside / wildlife from over development 1 Alternative Suggestions (General environment) 11 Air pollution should be reduced / kept to a minimum / the first consideration 11 GENERAL FREQUENCY / VOLUME 602 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 200 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Nutfield 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights 130 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for arrivals 5 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for departures 2 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for RWY26 arrivals 5 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for RWY08 departures 6 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Alfold 3 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Betchworth 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Bidborough 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Chiddingstone 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Crowborough 6 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Dormansland 3 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Eridge Green 2 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Fordcombe 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Groombridge 2 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Haywards Heath 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Hever 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over the High Weald AONB 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Lambs Green 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Langton Green 10 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Linfield 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over North Holmwood 3 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Rusper 3 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Reigate 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Penshurst 6 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Speldhurst 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Sevenoaks 2 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Tunbridge Wells 9 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Warnham 1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Tonbridge 4 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Wisborough Green 2 Oppose changes to frequency / volume of arrivals 4 Oppose changes to frequency / volume of flights / additional air traffic 119 Existing Situation (General frequency/volume) 395 Negative impact of existing flights 110 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Leith Hill 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting North Holmwood 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting my area 70 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Alfold 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Crowborough 7 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Earlswood 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Edenbridge 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Eridge Green 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Hever 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Kirdford 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Langton Green 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Lingfield 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Nutfield 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Penshurst 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Redhill 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Reigate 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Rusper 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Slinfold 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Smallfield 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Speldhurst 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Tonbridge 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Tunbridge Wells 17 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased 272 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently 102 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Alfold / Alfold Bars 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Ashdown Forest 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Betchworth 7 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Bidborough 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Brockham 11 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Capel 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Chailey 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Coldharbour 4 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Copthorne 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Crowborough 12 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Dorking 4 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Dormansland 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over East Grinstead 4 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Eridge Green 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Fordcombe 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Four Elms 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Frant 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Groombridge 4 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Hadlow 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Haywards Heath 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Hever 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Holmwood 9 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Horsham 17 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Ifold 7 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Kingsfold 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Leigh 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Leith Hill 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Lamberhurst 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Langton Green 11 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Loxwood 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Mark Cross 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over North Holmwood 5 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Plaistow 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Pulborough 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Redhill 5 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Reigate 8 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Salfords 4 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Rusper 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Seaford 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Sevenoaks 4 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over South Holmwood 5 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Southborough 2 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Slinfold 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over the Surrey Hills AONB 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Tonbridge 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Tunbridge Wells 14 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Vigo 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Warnham 4 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Wisborough Green 2 Frequency / volume of flights negatively impacts populated / residential areas 8 Frequency / volume of flights negatively impacts quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 73 Alternative Suggestions (General frequency/volume) 43 Frequency / volume of flights should be reduced 42 Frequency / volume of flights should be reduced on the SFD route 1 GENERAL HOUSING / PROPERTY 594 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to the Surrey Hills to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on new / additional housing developments 25 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Ashurst to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 4 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 235 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Betchworth to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 22 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Bidborough to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Blackbrook to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Brockham to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 14 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Capel to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Charlwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Cobham to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Crowborough to avoid aircraft noise / flight path 5 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Dorking to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 4 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to East Grinstead to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Edenbridge to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Eridge to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to High Weald AONB to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Holmwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 6 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Horsham to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 13 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Ifold to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Kingsfold to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 4 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Kirdford to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Langton Green to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Leigh to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Loxwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 3 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to North Holmwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Pulborough to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Reigate to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 3 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Rowhook to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 3 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Rusper to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 3 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Seaford to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Sevenoaks to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Slinfold to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to South Holmwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 6 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Southborough to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Tonbridge to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Tunbridge Wells to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 5 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Vigo to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 2 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Warnham to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 12 Concerns about the impact on property / house prices 278 Base size: 2836 Q.A Are you responding on your own behalf or on behalf of an organisation or group? Providing my own response 2836 Providing a response on behalf of an organisation or group - Base size: 2802 Q.B Which, if any, of the following applies to you? I work for Gatwick Airport Ltd 10 I work for an agency / company other than Gatwick Airport Ltd that operates at Gatwick Airport 29 A member of my family works at Gatwick Airport 20 My job is dependent on Gatwick Airport 12 A member of my family’s job is dependent on Gatwick Airport 13 None of these 2729 Don’t know 9 I/relative works for Gatwick/job depends on Gatwick 64 Base size: 2791 Q.H How old are you 16-24 58 25-34 131 35-44 422 45-54 738 55-64 687 65-74 498 75 and over 109 Prefer not to say 148 16-34 189 35-54 1160 55+ 1294 Base size: 2794 Q.I Are you ...? Male 1516 Female 1146 Prefer not to say 132 Base size: 2778 Q.K What is your ethnic group White 2476 English / Welsh / Scottish / Northern Irish /British 2406 Irish 19 Gypsy or Irish Traveller 1 Any other White background 50 Mixed / multiple ethnic groups 15 White and Black Caribbean 4 White and Black African 1 White and Asian 7 Any other mixed / multiple ethnic groups 3 Asian / Asian British 8 Indian 4 Pakistani - Bangladeshi - Chinese 2 Any other Asian background 2 Black / African / Caribbean / Black British 2 African 1 Caribbean - Any other Black / African / Caribbean background 1 Any other ethnic group - Arab - Any other ethnic group background - Prefer not to say 277 Gatwick Local Area Consultation Marked-up Codeframe - Response Form (Stakeholder Organisations - Closed Questions Only)

This document provides the topline results for a consultation on proposed changes to airspace in the vicinity of Gatwick Airport.

The consultation ran from 23rd May to 15th August 2014. Respondents took part online via a survey link on Gatwick Airport's website.

122 stakeholder organisations took part in the consultation.

Results to each question are based on all answering. This means that the base for each question may be different.

Results are also based on absolute numbers, and not percentages

Data are unweighted Stakeholder Organisation Response Base size: 41 Q.1a Which ONE of the SIX alternative proposed options, if any, do you believe provides the best balance of benefits for RWY26 departures? Option A 2 Option A with night-time respite 3 Option B - Option B with night-time respite 1 Option C - Option C with night-time respite 4 None of these 16 Don’t know 15 Base size: 37 Q.1b Which, if any, noise concerns do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining the best option for RWY26 departures heading to the south? Noise in the day that impacts my quality of life 24 Noise at night that disturbs my sleep 23 Noise in the day that affects my business or company /the business or company within which I work 13 Noise at night that affects my business or company / the business or company within which I work 8 Noise in the day that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 15 Noise at night that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 11 Noise over the countryside in the daytime 18 Noise over the countryside at night 15 Noise over populated areas in the daytime 18 Noise over populated areas at night 21 Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks 18 Noise impacts my health 14 Potential noise impact on house prices 19 Potential noise impact on local tourism 16 Other answers 6 None of these 1 Don't know 5 Base size: 30 Q.1c If Gatwick Airport Limited were to implement the proposed route, what width NPR swathe do you think is 2 Kilometrest it? 6 1.5 kilometres - 1 kilometre 3 500 metres 4 Others answers 17 None of these 6 Don't know 11 Base size: 17 Q.1d If you have answered question 1c, what were the reasons for your choice? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 6 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 7 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 11 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 2 NPR swathes affect tourism 6 Base size: 37 Q.2a Compared with today’s routes, do you believe the proposed realignment for RWY08 departures to the east/northeast of Gatwick Airport is better or worse? The proposed realignment is ... Much better 3 Somewhat better 5 Somewhat worse 3 Much worse 9 Don’t know 17 Better 8 Worse 12 Net better -4 Base size: 34 Q.2b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining whether to realign the RWY08 departures to the east/northeast? Noise in the day that impacts my quality of life 16 Noise at night that disturbs my sleep 15 Noise in the day that affects my business or company /the business or company within which I work 11 Noise at night that affects my business or company / the business or company within which I work 5 Noise in the day that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 12 Noise at night that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 10 Noise over the countryside in the daytime 16 Noise over the countryside at night 14 Noise over populated areas in the daytime 10 Noise over populated areas at night 12 Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks 20 Noise impacts my health 8 Potential noise impact on house prices 12 Potential noise impact on local tourism 12 Other answers 11 None of these 2 Don't know 9 Base size: 26 Q.2c If Gatwick Airport Limited were to implement the proposed route, what width NPR swathe do you think is most appropriate? 2 Kilometres 2 1.5 kilometres 1 1 kilometre 3 500 metres 2 Others answers 18 None of these 7 Don't know 11 Base size: 15 Q.2d If you have answered question 2c, what were the reasons for your choice? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 6 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 9 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 8 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 6 NPR swathes affect tourism 8 Base size: 39 Q.3a Should Gatwick Airport Limited seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY26 could be implemented (as shown in Map 34 and Map 35)? Yes – definitely 7 Yes – probably 2 No – probably not 1 No – definitely not 14 Don’t know 15 Yes 9 No 15 Net yes -6 Base size: 38 Q.3b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Ltd to consider when determining whether to seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY26 could be implemented? Noise in the day that impacts my quality of life 10 Noise at night that disturbs my sleep 23 Noise in the day that affects my business or company /the business or company within which I work 8 Noise at night that affects my business or company / the business or company within which I work 7 Noise in the day that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 8 Noise at night that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 12 Noise over the countryside in the daytime 13 Noise over the countryside at night 19 Noise over populated areas in the daytime 8 Noise over populated areas at night 19 Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks 17 Noise impacts my health 12 Potential noise impact on house prices 12 Potential noise impact on local tourism 12 Other answers 10 None of these 2 Don't know 8 Base size: 38 Q.4a Should Gatwick Airport Limited seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY08 could be implemented (as shown in Map 38 and Map 39)? Yes – definitely 5 Yes – probably 3 No – probably not 1 No – definitely not 15 Don’t know 14 Yes 8 No 16 Net yes -8 Base size: 33 Q.4b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining whether to seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY08 could be implemented? Noise in the day that impacts my quality of life 9 Noise at night that disturbs my sleep 22 Noise in the day that affects my business or company /the business or company within which I work 7 Noise at night that affects my business or company / the business or company within which I work 7 Noise in the day that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 6 Noise at night that affects a community facility (e.g. hospital) 11 Noise over the countryside in the daytime 10 Noise over the countryside at night 17 Noise over populated areas in the daytime 10 Noise over populated areas at night 22 Noise over Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty or National Parks 14 Noise impacts my health 13 Potential noise impact on house prices 15 Potential noise impact on local tourism 11 Other answers 7 None of these - Don't know 7 Base size: 39 Q.5a Should Gatwick Airport Limited re-centre and narrow the published NPRs to take account of aircraft performance on the modern PBN routes in place at Gatwick Airport? Yes – definitely 5 Yes – probably 6 No – probably not 3 No – definitely not 19 Don’t know 6 Yes 11 No 22 Net yes -11 Base size: 33 Q.5b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider with respect to re-centering and narrowing published NPRs to take into account aircraft performance on the modern PBN routes? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 11 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 19 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 15 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 8 NPR swathes affect tourism 9 None of these 3 Don't know 4 Base size: 41 Q.6a Should Gatwick Airport Limited implement shortened NPRs to take account of the observed climb performance of the flights at Gatwick Airport? Yes – definitely 8 Yes – probably 6 No – probably not 7 No – definitely not 12 Don’t know 8 Yes 14 No 19 Net yes -5 Base size: 34 Q.6b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining whether to implement shortened NPRs to take account of the observed climb performance? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 13 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 16 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 17 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 10 NPR swathes affect tourism 10 None of these 3 Don't know 5 Base size: 38 Q.7a The existing PBN route for RWY26 DVR/CLN/LAM departures means that aircraft fly outside the NPR. Should Gatwick Airport Limited re-centre and narrow the published NPR to correct this anomaly? Yes – definitely 7 Yes – probably 5 No – probably not 2 No – definitely not 10 Don’t know 14 Yes 12 No 12 Net yes 0 Base size: 32 Q.7b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport to consider, with respect to correcting the published NPR for the RWY26 DVR/CLN/LAM route, so that it captures where aircraft actually fly? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 10 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 15 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 15 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 7 NPR swathes affect tourism 9 None of these 2 Don't know 8 Base size: 41 Q.8a Should Gatwick Airport Limited consider NPR swathes with variable widths, dependant on sharpness of turns on each route, as a more accurate portrayal of where aircraft actually overfly? Yes – definitely 5 Yes – probably 10 No – probably not 5 No – definitely not 13 Don’t know 8 Yes 15 No 18 Net yes -3 Base size: 35 Q.8b Which, if any, factors do you believe to be the most important for Gatwick Airport Limited when considering NPR swathes with variable widths, dependant on sharpness of turns on each route, as a more accurate portrayal of where aircraft actually overfly? NPR swathes should only cover areas that are likely to be directly over-flown 9 NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from over-flights of nearby areas 18 NPR swathes affect house / property prices 15 NPR swathes affect the local economy and investment in the area 7 NPR swathes affect tourism 9 None of these 2 Don't know 8 Base size: 43 Q.A Are you responding on your own behalf or on behalf of an organisation or group? Providing my own response - Providing a response on behalf of an organisation or group 43 Base size: 43 Q.E What category of organisation or group are you representing? Academic (includes universities and other academic institutions) 3 Action group 6 Aviation group 1 Elected representative (includes MPs, MEPs, and local councillors) 1 Environment, heritage, amenity or community group 18 Local Government 14 Statutory agency - Transport, infrastructure or utility organisation 2 Professional body - Charity / voluntary sector group 4 Other category of organisation or group 7 Prefer not to say - Base size: 41 Q.F Number of members in your organisation or group 1 to 10 6 11 to 50 5 51 to 100 5 101 to 500 13 501 to 1,000 2 Over 1000 10 Gatwick Local Area Consultation Marked-up Codeframe - Email and Whitemail (General Public Responses)

This document provides the topline results for a consultation on proposed changes to airspace in the vicinity of Gatwick Airport.

The consultation ran from 23rd May to 15th August 2014. Respondents took part online via a survey link on Gatwick Airport's website.

638 members of the public aged 16 and over took part in the consultation via email and post.

Results to each question are based on all answering. This means that the base for each question may be different.

Results are also based on absolute numbers, and not percentages Total Email Postal Base size: 191 124 67 Q.1e What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the options put forward for RWY26 departures heading to the south? Q1EE - RWY26 - DEPARTURES HEADING SOUTH 191 124 67 OPTION A 174 112 62 Criticism of the ADNID route / flight path trial 56 29 27 Oppose ADNID route / flight path trial 32 21 11 Oppose Option A / Option A is the worst option 523 Support Option A / Option A is the best option 11- Positive comments (option A) 1-1 Option A is the least worst option / best compromise 1-1 Negative comments (option A) 143 90 53 Option A will have a negative impact on a greater number of people 321 Option A will have a negative impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 211 Option A will have a negative impact on the residents of Rusper 11- Option A will have a negative impact on the residents of Slinfold 11- Option A will have a negative impact on the residents of Warnham 22- Option A will have a negative impact on those not previously on flight paths / routes / NPRs 1-1 Option A will increase noise in the area 1-1 ADNID route / flight path trial altitude is decreasing / has decreased / has lowered recently over my area 761 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased the frequency / volume of flights over the area 21 14 7

ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on businesses 22- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on communities / residents 14 4 10 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on property / property prices 752 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 44 26 18

ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on my area 853

ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the environment 541 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Beare Green 22- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Bletchingley 1-1 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Broadbridge Heath 321 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Brockham 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Coldharbour 55- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Faygate 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of The Haven 22- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Holmwood 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Horley 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Horsham 16 9 7 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Ifold 22- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Kingsfold 312 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Kirdford 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Loxwood 33- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of North Holmwood 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Redhill 211 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Reigate 2-2 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Rusper 24 13 11 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Seaford 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Sevenoaks 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Slinfold 954 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Storrington 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of the Surrey Hills 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Tunbridge Wells 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Warnham 18 6 12 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Wealden area 321 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Wisborough Green 11- ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on the residents of Worthing 211 ADNID route / flight path trial is having a negative impact on those not previously on flight paths / routes / NPRs 13 9 4 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased night time / early morning flights in our area 17 14 3 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased noise in the area 48 31 17 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased noise over Rusper 642 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased noise over Warnham 33-

ADNID route / flight path trial has increased noise over Tunbridge Wells 211 ADNID route / flight path trial has increased pollution / impacted on air quality in the area 10 4 6

Concerns about lack of prior consultation on flight path changes / ADNID trial 40 30 10 Alternative suggestions (option A) 58 41 17

Return to pre-ADNID trial flight path / routes / pre-February trial flight path 58 41 17 OPTION B 734 Oppose Option B / Option B is the worst option 1-1 Support Option B / Option B is the best option 211 Positive comments (option B) 2-2 Option B is the least worst option / best compromise 2-2 Negative comments (option B) 321 Option B will have a negative impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 11- Option B will have a negative impact on those not previously on flight paths / routes / NPRs 211 OPTION C 13 5 8 Support Option C / Option C is the best option 413 Oppose Option C / Option C is the worst option 312 Positive comments (option C) 624 Option C is the least worst option / best compromise 514 Option C will affect the fewest people (who are not already affected( 11- Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Horsham 2-2 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Rusper 3-3 Option C will have least (noise( impact on populated / residential areas like Warnham 2-2 Negative comments (option C) 532 Option C will have a negative impact on the residents of Alfold 11- Option C will have a negative impact on the residents of Rusper 11- Option C will have a negative impact on those not previously on flight paths / routes / NPRs 2-2 Option C will increase noise in the area 11- Option C will have a negative impact on quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 11- Night time respite 211

Option C with night time respite is the least worse option / best compromise 211 OTHER OPTIONS / RWY26 - DEPARTURES HEADING SOUTH 51 29 22 I am not affected by RWY26 departures / departures heading South / listen to views of those affected 22- Oppose 44 24 20 All options / options A / B / C are too similar 33- All options / options A / B / C will have a negative impact on residents below the new NPRs 44-

All options will have a negative impact on populated / residential areas 321

All options will have a negative impact on rural areas / countryside / AONB 11- All options will have a negative impact on the local economy 11- Concerns about the impact of RWY26 departures aircraft noise 752 Concerns about the impact of RWY26 southbound TIGER / DAGGA / WIZARD departures on my area 11-

Oppose / against any / all options for changes to RWY26 departures 32 14 18 Proposed RWY26 departures will negatively impact quality of life / health and well being / sleep 211 RWY26 departures / maps are insufficient / lack detail / more maps are required 22- Alternative suggestions 10 7 3

RWY26 DVR / CLN / BIG / LAM departures should fly south of Sevenoaks 1-1 RWY26 southbound BOGNA / HARDY-SFD departures should avoid populated / residential areas / Rusper 11- RWY26 southbound TIGER / DAGGA / WIZARD departures route turning east minimises noise impact on Capel 1-1 RWY26 departures should be spread as widely as possible / to disperse / not concentrate negative impact 11-

RWY26 departures should utilise the BOGNA / HARDY-SFD route more 11-

RWY26 departures should utilise the TIGER / DAGGA / WIZARD route more 541

Base size: 31 21 10 Q.2e What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for the realignment for RWY08 departures to the east/north east? Q2EE - RWY08 - DEPARTURES HEADING EAST / NORTH EAST 31 21 10

Support RWY08 departures option / is a good idea / would be welcomed 11 9 2

Oppose / against RWY08 departure option heading East / North East 981 I am not affected by RWY08 departures / departures heading East / North East / listen to views of those affected 211 Positive comments 541

Proposed RWY08 departures will mean the effect on Sevenoaks is reduced 1-1

Proposed RWY08 LAM route changes would benefit elevated locations 211 Proposed RWY08 LAM route changes would benefit historic buildings in the area 11- Proposed RWY08 LAM route changes would benefit countryside / rural areas / AONB 44- Proposed RWY08 LAM route changes would benefit Crockham Hill 11- Proposed RWY08 LAM route changes would benefit Sevenoaks 11- Proposed RWY08 LAM route changes would benefit Westerham 11- Negative comments 11 6 5 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures 22- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on Cowden 33- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on East Grinstead 1-1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on North Downs 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on Penshurst 3-3 Proposed RWY08 departures will not affect fewer people 1-1 Proposed RWY08 departures will negatively impact quality of life / health and well being / sleep 11- Proposed narrow RWY08 departures swathe will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground 1-1 RWY08 departures option is inadequate / result is minimal 11- Alternative suggestions 532 RWY08 LAM departures should be routed south / east 2-2 RWY08 LAM departures should adhere to the NPR 11-

RWY08 LAM departures should be routed further north to avoid Lingfield 11- RWY08 departures should follow RWY08 DVR / BIG / CLN / avoid using RWY08 LAM 11-

RWY08 LAM departures should follow RWY08 DVR / BIG / CLN for longer 11-

Base size: 50 34 16 Q.3c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY26 could be implemented?

Q3C - RWY26 - ARRIVALS - NIGHT TIME RESPITE 50 34 16

I am not affected by RWY26 arrivals / listen to views of those affected 1-1 Oppose - Proposed RWY26 arrivals options 16 10 6 Oppose - Proposed RWY26 arrivals night time respite options 211 Support - Proposed RWY26 arrivals night time respite options 22- Positive comments 22- Conditional support for proposed options for RWY26 arrivals night time respite 11- Proposed RWY26 arrivals option would benefit Hever 11- Negative comments 39 27 12

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals 761 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals on Cowden 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals on Langton Green 853 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals on Penshurst 1-1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY26 arrivals on Tunbridge Wells 11- Existing RWY26 arrivals are negatively impacting my area 422 Proposed narrow RWY26 arrivals swathe will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground 15 11 4 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for my area 11- Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Bidborough 11- Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Chiddingstone 312 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Crowborough 44- Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Groombridge 523 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for High Weald AONB 2-2 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Hever / Hever Castle 2-2 Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Langton 22- Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Sevenoaks 11- Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Speldhurst 11- Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts for Penshurst 413 Proposed RWY26 arrivals will negatively impact quality of life / health and well being / sleep 22- Proposed RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will mean more people will be affected 33- Proposed RWY26 respite option is inadequate / result is minimal 321 Proposed RWY26 respite option will increase aircraft noise 11- Alternative suggestions 14 14 - RWY26 arrivals flight paths / NPRs should be moved further West 55- RWY26 arrivals should avoid residential / populated areas 11- RWY26 arrivals should avoid Crowborough 22- RWY26 arrivals should be routed North East of Tonbridge 11- RWY26 arrivals should be spread as widely as possible / to disperse / not concentrate negative impact 66- RWY26 arrivals should have a steeper approach / steeper descent 22- RWY26 arrivals should decrease approaches from the South 11-

Base size: 38 25 13 Q.4c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to seek changes to the current DfT noise abatement requirements, so that the proposed night-time arrival respite route for RWY08 could be implemented?

Q4C - RWY08 - ARRIVALS - NIGHT TIME RESPITE 38 25 13

I am not affected by RWY08 arrivals / listen to views of those affected 22- Support - Changes to current DfT noise abatement requirements 11- Support - Proposed RWY08 arrivals night time respite options 211 Oppose - Changes to current DfT noise abatement requirements 15 5 10 Oppose - Proposed RWY08 arrivals options 11- Oppose - Proposed RWY08 arrivals night time respite options 11- Positive comments 211

Penshurst Parish Council support the existing multi-route method for arrivals / shares noise burden over residential areas to the East of Gatwick 1-1

Tunbridge Wells Council support the existing multi-route method for arrivals / shares noise burden over residential areas to the East of Gatwick 211 Negative comments 15 12 3

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals 22- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals on Billingshurst 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals on Ifold 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths from RWY08 arrivals on Loxwood / Alfolds 211 Proposed respite route will mean more people will be affected / negatively impacted 55- Proposed respite route will mean more people will be affected / negatively impacted by noise 11- Proposed RWY08 arrivals flight paths / NPRs will increase impacts on local area 11- Proposed RWY08 arrivals will negatively impact quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 211 Proposed RWY08 respite option is inadequate / result is minimal 11-

I am unsure of what night time respite for RWY08 arrivals would achieve 1-1 Existing Situation 33- Existing RWY08 arrivals are negatively impacting Alfold 22- Existing RWY08 arrivals are increasing / have increased / have got worse recently 22- Alternative suggestions 55- RWY08 arrivals should avoid populated / residential areas 11-

RWY08 arrivals should avoid routed west of Plaistow to provide respite 11- RWY08 arrivals should avoid routed south of Billingshurst 11- RWY08 arrivals should avoid routed south of Southwater 11- RWY08 arrivals should be spread as widely as possible / to disperse / not concentrate negative impact 33- Base size: 222 161 61 Q.5c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider re-centring and narrowing published NPRs to take into account aircraft performance on the modern PBN routes (please provide any views you have on what the optimal width for NPR swathes should be)?

Q5C - RE-CENTERING / NARROWING EXISTING NPR 222 161 61

Oppose narrow NPR swathes / PBN is a bad idea / would not be welcomed 77 57 20 Oppose re-centring / realignment of NPR 13 8 5

Oppose wide / widened NPR swathes is a bad idea / would not be welcomed 33- Support narrow NPR swathes / PBN is a good idea / seems sensible / would be welcomed 13 12 1 Support narrow NPR swathes / PBN is a good idea / seems sensible / would be welcomed (conditional) 11- Positive comments 99- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN means a smaller area / fewer people are disturbed / impacted by noise 99- Negative comments 110 91 19 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN means more people are disturbed / impacted by noise 541 Modern technology is capable of maintaining the existing 'broad swathe' policy 853 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on noise sensitive areas below 10 7 3 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on the countryside / rural areas / AONBs 862 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on the desirability / character of the area 211 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on the quality of life / health and well being of those directly beneath 22 21 1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Beare Green 22- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will have a negative impact on village schools beneath 33- Noise 73 65 8 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath 41 37 4 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Bidborough 11- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Brockham 431 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Chiddingstone 33- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Crowborough 33- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Coldharbour 11- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Fordcombe 1-1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Groombridge 211 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Hever 22- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in North Holmwood 11- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Langton Green 651 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Penshurst 10 10 - Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Redhill 22- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Rusthall 11- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Southborough 11- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Speldhurst 22- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Tonbridge 11- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate noise / disturbance for those directly beneath / in Tunbridge Wells 33- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground 33- Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground (arrivals( 514 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will increase / concentrate impacts for those directly beneath / on the ground (RWY08 arrivals( 1-1 Narrow NPR swathes / PBN will not work as aircraft do not follow flight paths / adhere to NPRs 33-

Narrow NPR swathes limit / will not permit opportunities for (genuine) respite 2-2 Alternative Suggestions 131 92 39

New PBN departure routes should be introduced within existing NPRs 651 NPR swathes should be limited to 1000 metres 1-1 NPR swathes should be narrower to condense / contain disruption in a smaller area 422 NPR swathes should not be narrowed unless multiple routes are introduced to provide respite 413

NPR swathes should only be narrowed after more evidence is provided 22- NPR swathes should be wider / as wide as possible to cover a greater area / benefit more people 44-

NPR swathes should be wider / are fairer / they spread / disperse noise / disruption over a greater area / provide respite / contain multiple routes 118 84 34

Base size: 36 21 15 Q.6c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider when determining whether to implement shortened NPRs to take account of the observed climb performance of the flights at Gatwick Airport?

Q6C - SHORTENED NPRs 36 21 15 Support shortened NPRs / are a good idea / seem sensible / would be welcomed 33-

Oppose shortened NPRs / are a bad idea / would not be welcomed 22 11 11 I am not affected by shortened NPRs / departures / listen to views of those affected 2-2 Positive comments 22- Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb quicker / create less disturbance / noise on the ground 22- Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb quicker / affect smaller area on the ground 11- Negative comments 752 Shortened NPRs are inadequate / results are minimal 211 Shortened NPRs mean aircraft climb at full throttle / create more disturbance / noise on the ground 642 Alternative suggestions 22-

NPR swathes should only be shortened after more evidence is provided 11-

Shortened NPRs should only be used if noise / disurbance is reduced 11-

Base size: 74 54 20 Q.7c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about the proposals for Gatwick Airport Limited to consider, with respect to correcting the published NPR for the RWY26 DVR/CLN/LAM route, so that it captures where aircraft actually fly? Q7C - CORRECTING NPR FOR RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM 74 54 20 Support correction of NPRs / a good idea / seems sensible / would be welcomed 716 Oppose changes to RWY26 north / northeast bound DVR / CLN / BIG / LAM departures 23 20 3 Oppose correction of NPRs / changes to NPRs are unnecessary / not needed / leave NPRs as they are 32 26 6 I am not affected by correction of NPRs / listen to views of those affected 11- Negative comments 40 35 5 Noise 37 32 5 Concerns about lack of prior consultation on RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change 13 11 2 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise 761 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Beare Green 33- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Betchworth 11- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Brockham 66-

RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Capel 211 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Coldharbour 22- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Dorking 11- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Holmwood 33- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Redhill 11- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in Reigate 321 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased aircraft noise in South Holmwood 55- Early Morning/Night Flights 16 14 2 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over Holmwood 11- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased frequency / volume of flights 11 10 1 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights 22- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over Brockham 33- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over Betchworth 11- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has increased night time / early morning flights over Capel 211 Impact 13 13 - RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has negatively impacted countryside / rural areas / AONB 55- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has negatively impacted quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 66- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change has negatively impacted the environment 44- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change is negatively impacting previously unaffected areas 66- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change is negatively impacting previously unaffected areas like Holmwood 22- RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change is negatively impacting previously unaffected areas like North Holmwood 11-

RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change negatively impacts more people 22- Correction of NPRs is inadequate / results are minimal 11- Alternative suggestions 12 9 3 Flight paths / NPRs should be adhered to / fine / penalise airlines that deviate from existing NPRs 871 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM NPR change should avoid populated / residential areas / should fly over countryside 321 RWY26 DVR / CLN / LAM route should modify PBN departures to accurately reflect the old NPR routes 211

Base size: 18 7 11 Q.8c What, if any, comments or suggestions do you have about whether Gatwick Airport Limited should consider NPR swathes with variable widths as a more accurate portrayal of where aircraft actually overfly?

Q8C - NPR VARIABLE WIDTHS 18 7 11 Support for variable width swathes 734 Oppose NPR swathes with variable width 826 Positive comments 752 NPR swathe widths should accurately reflect where planes overfly 422

Variable width swathes would disperse impacts over a wider area / population 33-

Base size: 467 341 126 General Flight Paths / NPRs GENERAL DEPARTURES 21 15 6 Oppose (General departures) 17 13 4 Aircraft operators set the vertical departure profiles therefore reduction of NPR width / length is unlikely 11-

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for departures 651

Existing frequency / volume of departures are negatively impacting my area --- I / we are now being affected by aircraft taking off in both the easterly and westerly direction 11- Oppose changes to frequency / volume of departures 33- Oppose new departure flight paths / NPRs / changes are unnecessary / not needed 743 Oppose additional departures / no departures over populated / residential areas --- Alternative suggestion 532 Aircraft should increase the angle of trajectory / climb faster / as fast as possible 422

Changes to lower altitudes should incorporate Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NAPDs) requiring aircraft to climb to 3000 ft quickly 11- Departures should minimise the number of turns --- Departures should be routed to the west of Crowborough --- Noise abatement takeoff profiles will become mandatory / GAL should be taking a lead on this 11- Technical suggestions - Departures --- GENERAL ARRIVALS 84 62 22 Support (General arrivals) --- Support / have no problem with Point Merge System --- Oppose (General arrivals) 68 49 19 Arrivals negatively impact populated / residential areas --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for arrivals 11 10 1 Concerns about the impact of Standard Arrival Routes 20 15 5 Concerns about the lack of monitoring of arrivals below 4000ft 11- Frequency / volume of arrivals are negatively impacting my area ---

Oppose additional arrivals / no arrivals over populated / residential areas 1-1 Oppose late night arrivals after 11pm --- Oppose new arrival flight paths / NPRs / changes are unnecessary / not needed 761

Oppose the proposed single entry / point merge flight control system 33 20 13 The Point Merge System would be unfair for those living underneath whose lives would be ruined by incessant noise 17 12 5

The Point Merge System would be unfair for those living underneath whose lives would be ruined by air pollution from the flow of planes overhead 541 The Point Merge System would be unfair for those living underneath whose lives would be ruined 33- Alternative suggestions (General arrivals) 28 22 6 Air braking should be avoided over residential areas --- Arrivals holding stacks should be moved further away / elsewhere / over the sea 422 Arrivals should have a gentle approach / gentle descent --- Arrivals should be spread as widely as possible / to disperse / not concentrate negative impact 523 Arrivals should have a steeper approach / steeper descent 10 10 - Arrivals should maximise continuous descent approaches 99- Arrivals should minimise stepped descents 11- Arrivals should minimise the number of turns 11- Arrivals should avoid towns / villages Warnham --- Arrivals should avoid towns / villages on the final approach 1-1 NPRs should apply to arrivals --- The Point Merge System should be used off the coast but with multi-path approach routes into Gatwick 33- Technical suggestions - Arrivals 11- GENERAL NIGHT FLIGHTS / RESPITE 233 177 56 I am not affected by / do not lose sleep from night time flights / listen to views of those affected --- Oppose a single narrow night-time respite route 11- Oppose night time respite / is a bad idea / would not be welcomed 981 Support night time respite / is a good idea / would be welcomed 321 Support respite for night time / day time / multiple routes for respite 11-

Support respite / is a good idea / would be welcomed in the countryside 11- Conditional support for / limited / night time respite options --- Support respite / is a good idea / would be welcomed 22- Oppose respite options 11 9 2 Support (General night flights/respite) 321 Night time respite would benefit Capel --- Night time respite would benefit High Weald AONB 1-1 Night time respite would benefit Loxwood --- Night time respite would benefit Tonbridge 11- Night time respite would benefit Tunbridge Wells 11- Night time respite would benefit the local community / residents ---

Respite options means fewer people are disturbed / impacted by noise 11- Oppose (General night flights/respite) 107 77 30 Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights 22 13 9

Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights over Cowden 11-

Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights over Ifold 11- Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights over Langton Green 2-2

Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights over Rusper 514 Concerns about the impact of night time / early morning flights over Tunbridge Wells ---

Concerns about the frequency of flights at night time / early morning 844 Existing RWY26 respite option is sufficient --- Night time / early morning flights cause light pollution --- Night time / early morning flights negatively impact local businesses / tourist industry 1-1 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact populated / residential areas 211 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact property values / house prices 1-1 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 41 28 13 Night time / early morning flights negatively impact the environment 1-1

Night time / early morning flights negatively impact wildlife / biodiversity ---

Night time respite options negatively impact more people / other people 11- Oppose early morning flights / flights at 6am or earlier 22-

Oppose night time / early morning flights / no (additional( night time flights 23 19 4 Proposals mean that my area will have no respite 11- Proposals mean that Capel will have no respite 1-1 Proposals mean that Chiddingstone will have no respite --- Proposals mean that Crowborough will have no respite --- Proposals mean that Edenbridge will have no respite 11- Proposals will mean that Groombridge will have no respite --- Proposals mean that Marsh Green will have no respite 11- Proposals mean that Penshurst will have no respite 431 Proposals mean that Speldhurst will have no respite 22- Proposed respite options are inadequate / result is minimal 14 9 5

Proposed respite options will negatively impact properties / property values 33- Respite doesn't work / shifts the problem elsewhere / is a flawed / misleading concept 22- Existing Situation (General night flights/respite) 131 106 25 Impact of night time / early morning flights 92 74 18 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact my area 14 13 1 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Alfold ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Beare Green 431

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Betchworth 11-

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Bidborough 11-

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Billingshurst 11-

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Brockham --- Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Capel 321

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Chiddingstone 321

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Coldharbour 77-

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Crowborough 642

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Edenbridge ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Eridge Green ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Fordcombe --- Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Frant ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Groombridge 312

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Heathfield 211

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Haywards Heath --- Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Hever ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Holmwood 22- Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Horley ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Horsham 642 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Ifold ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Kingsfold ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Langton Green 871 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Leigh 1-1

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Mark Cross ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact North Holmwood 11- Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Oxted 11-

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Penshurst 11- Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Redhill --- Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Reigate 1-1

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Rowhook --- Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Rusper 541 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Slinfold 33-

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Speldhurst 981

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Stopham ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Southborough 22-

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact South Holmwood 431

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Tonbridge ---

Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact Tunbridge Wells 431 Existing night time / early morning flights negatively impact --- Existing frequency / volume of night time / early morning flights is increasing / has increased / has increased recently (Net) 51 42 9 Existing frequency / volume of night time / early morning flights is increasing / has increased / has increased recently 18 17 1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Alfold 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Betchworth 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Billingshurst 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Crowborough 642 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Dorking 1-1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in East Grinstead --- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Eridge --- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Hadlow --- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Hever --- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Kirdford 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in North Holmwood 2-2 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Lamberhurst --- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Langton Green 541 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Leith Hill 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Plaistow 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Plaxtol 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Pootings 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Redhill --- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Reigate --- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Sevenoaks 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in South Holmwood 33- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in The Haven 11- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Tonbridge 1-1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Tunbridge Wells 33- Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Wadhurst 1-1 Existing night time / early morning flights are increasing / have increased / have increased recently in Warnham 11- Existing respite options are insufficient 55- Existing respite routes negatively impact Cowden 11- Alternative suggestions (General night flights/respite) 38 28 10 Day time respite should be considered 11- Day time respite should be within current flight paths / NPRs 2-2 Night time / early morning flights / limits should be adhered to / fine / penalise Gatwick for exceeding limits 642

Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas 22- Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas / Crowborough --- Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas / Edenbridge --- Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas / Holmwood 11- Night time / early morning flights should avoid populated / residential areas / Warnham 1-1 Night time / early morning flights should be at a higher altitude --- Night time / early morning flights should be reduced 211 Night time / early morning flights should have more routes / more routes to provide respite ---

Night flights / night time noise / noise should be reduced / minimised at night 642 Night flights / night time noise / should ensure the minimum number of people are affected ---

Night time flights should not be between the hours of Xpm and Xam 16 13 3 Night time respite should be between Xpm and Xam 22-

Respite for the day time should be included in proposed arrivals options --- Night time respite should be within current flight paths / NPRs 2-2

Respite for the day time should be included in proposed departure options ---

Respite for the night time should be included in proposed departure options 11-

RWY26 new flight paths / NPRs should provide respite for local residents --- Other respite options should be considered 55- GENERAL FLIGHT PATHS / NPRs 396 281 115 Support (General flight paths/NPRs) 431 Conditional support for changes to / new flight paths / NPRs 11- New flight paths / NPRs will reduce noise impact to local residents / community --- Support new technology / PBN being used to define NPRs 321 Support changes to / new flight paths / NPRs --- Oppose (General flight paths/NPRs) 269 183 86

Concerns about changes to flight path / NPRs affecting so many people 55- Concerns about flight paths affecting quality of life 148 93 55 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Alfold 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 72 50 22 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Ashurst --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Ashurst Wood --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Beare Green 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Betchworth 2-2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Bidborough 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Billingshurst 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Bletchingley 1-1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Brockham --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of 1-1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Capel 211 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Chiddingstone 312 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Coldharbour 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Cowden 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Crowborough 10 6 4 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Earlswood 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of East Grinstead --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Eridge --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Fordcombe --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Groombridge 211 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Hever --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Holmwood 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Horsham 422 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Ifold 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Kingsfold --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Kirdford --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Lambs Green 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Langton Green 624 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Leigh 1-1 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Lingfield --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Loxwood 211 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Newdigate --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of North Holmwood --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Nutfield 211 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Penshurst 541 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Redhill 211 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Plaistow 11- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Pulborough --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Reigate 2-2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Rowhook --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Rusper 14 7 7 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Sevenoaks 22- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Slinfold 312 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Speldhurst 22- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Strood Green --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Tunbridge Wells 55- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Waldron 2-2 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Warnham 413 Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Withyham --- Concerns about flight paths / NPRs negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Worthing 1-1 Concerns about future changes to flight paths / NPRs 88- Concerns about NPRs not reflecting actual flight paths / aircraft fly outside NPRs to save fuel 431 Concerns about NPRs not reflecting the true impact of noise 651 Concerns about NPRs not reflecting actual flight paths / aircraft not adhering to NPR 752 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs (Net) 41 31 10 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs 33- Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Ashdown Forest AONB 12 6 6 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Brenchley --- Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Capel 33-

Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Chiddingstone 22- Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Cowden 11-

Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Crowborough 642 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Hadlow ---

Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over High Weald AONB 862 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Hever 22- Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Horsham 22-

Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Kent Downs AONB 11- Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Penshurst 871 Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Pulborough --- Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over Rusper 22-

Concerns about the impact of flight paths / NPRs over St Leonards Forest --- Concerns about the impact of PBN routes for turning angles 33- Concerns about the impact on the local community / residents not currently impacted by flight paths / NPRs 651 Concerns about the measurement / methodology used to devise new flight paths 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Groombridge 1-1 Flight path / NPRs should be compliant with Government environmental policy / EU Directives / Health & Safety policies 13 10 3 It is misleading to seek to establish a causal link between PBN, navigation accuracy and noise reduction 211 Oppose concentrating RWY08 flights between Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells 211

Oppose changes to / new flight paths / NPRs / changes are not needed 120 83 37 Existing situations (General flight paths/NPRs) 126 96 30 Impact on quality of life 126 96 30 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of my area 14 13 1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Beare Green 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Betchworth 22- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Bidborough --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Bletchingley 1-1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Billingshurst --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Broadbridge Heath 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Brockham 33- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Buckland --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Capel 422 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Coldharbour 99- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Chiddingstone 44- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Crowborough 633 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Dorking 22- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Dormansland --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Earlswood --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of East Grinstead --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Eridge Green --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Fordcombe --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Four Elms --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Groombridge --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Haywards Heath --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Heathfield 413 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Hever 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Holmwood 541 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Horsham 761 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Ifold --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Kingsfold --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Kirdford --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Langton Green 321 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Leigh --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Leith Hill 22- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Loxwood 211 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of North Holmwood 422 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of South Holmwood 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Nutfield --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Oxted 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Penshurst 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Plaxtol 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Plaistow --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Redhill 422 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Reigate 2-2 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Rusper 13 9 4 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Rusthall --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Salfords --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Slinfold 211 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Southborough 44- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of South Holmwood 541 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Southwater --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of Speldhurst 981 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and-well being / sleep for residents of the Surrey Hills AONB 11- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Tonbridge --- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Tunbridge Wells 55- Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Wadhurst 1-1 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Warnham 624 Existing flight paths / NPRs are negatively impacting quality of life / health and well-being / sleep for residents of Wisborough Green 11- Response contains technical data regarding flight paths / SIDs --- Alternative suggestions (General flight paths/NPRs) 168 126 42 Any proposals for flight path changes should respect government altitude based environmental policies 10 8 2 Extending the NPR up to X,XXX ft should be considered 11- Changes should be to older / disused flight paths / NPRs 11- Flight paths / NPRs 156 117 39 Flight paths / NPRs should affect as few people as possible 211 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Alford 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Ashdown Forest 651 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Beare Green 431 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Bidborough 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Betchworth 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Billingshurst 211 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Blackbrook --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Brockham 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Broadbridge Heath 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Bucks Green --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Capel 853 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Chiddingstone 321 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Coldharbour 541 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Cowden 33- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Copthorn 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Cranleigh --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Crawley --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Crowborough 312 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Cross-in-Hand --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Cuckfield --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Dormansland --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the North Downs 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Dorking --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Earlswood --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the South Downs 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Edenbridge --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid East Grinstead --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid elevated locations 422 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Eridge Green --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Fordcombe 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Five Oaks --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Groombridge 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Haywards Heath --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Heathfield 211 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Hever / Hever Castle 44- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the High Weald AONB 33- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Holmwood 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Ifold --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Horsham 211 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the Kent Downs AONB 44- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Langton Green 33- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Kingsfold --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Leigh 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Leith Hill 55- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Lingfield --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Loxwood 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid North Holmwood 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Markbeech --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Marsh Green --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Nutfield 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Penshurst 66- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Plaistow 7-7 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Redhill --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Rudgwick 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Reigate 1-1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Rusper 211 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Salfords --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Seaford --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Sevenoaks --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Slinfold 22- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Southborough 22- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Southwater --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid South Holmwood 211 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Speldhurst 44- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the Surrey Hills AONB 10 9 1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Tonbridge 22- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Tunbridge Wells 66- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Toys Hill 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Tunbridge Wells / be routed to the west of Tunbridge Wells 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Waldron 1-1 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Warnham 211 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Winterfold --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Wisborough Green 11- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid Woodhatch --- Flight paths / NPRs should avoid previously unaffected areas 10 8 2 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid populated / residential areas / should fly over countryside / rural areas 38 26 12 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the countryside / rural areas / should not disturb wildlife / livestock 10 6 4

Flight paths / NPRs should avoid the countryside / rural areas / AONB 27 22 5 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid tranquil / quiet / peaceful areas 14 11 3 Flight paths / NPRs should avoid heritage sites 11- Flight paths / NPRs should be adhered to / enforce NPRs / ensure there is no deviation from NPR 871 Flight paths / NPRs should be increased / have more routes / more routes to provide respite 88- Flight paths / NPRs should be fully / effectively utilised (before change is considered( --- Flight paths / NPRs should be used during the winter months only --- Flight paths / NPRs to the west must be matched by flight paths / NPRs to the east 11- Flight paths / NPRs should stay over densely populated areas / areas already impacted by noise 33- Flight paths should fly over industrial areas --- NPRs should only be changed if safety is improved 321 NPRs should only be changed if noise is reduced 11- NPR swathes should indicate potential noise impact from overflights of nearby areas 11 8 3 Routes should only be changed within existing NPRs 541

Base size: 602 448 154 Other Comments OTHERS 571 420 151 GENERAL AIRCRAFT 49 37 12

Concerns about older aircraft being louder / creating more noise / disturbance 55- Concerns about older aircraft being able to reach 4000 feet within shortened NPRs --- Modern aircraft will not climb more quickly / for fuel saving / engine saving reasons 211 Existing Situation (General aircraft) 14 12 2 Aircraft performance varies too much / is not consistent / changes on a daily basis --- Modern aircraft are capable of steeper climbs / descents 22- Modern aircraft are quieter / create less noise / disturbance 66- Modern aircraft navigate more accurately 541 Modern aircraft are not quieter / do not create less noise / disturbance 1-1 Smaller aircraft create more noise / disturbance / are not quieter --- Alternative Suggestions (General aircraft) 36 27 9 Airlines should invest in quieter aircraft / fitted with noise reduction equipment / engine refinements 23 16 7

Airlines should pay additional taxes / be fined for using old noisier planes 642 Aircraft should turn at a higher altitude 321 Modern / cleaner aircraft should be used 22- Modern / quieter aircraft should be used 66- GENERAL ALTITUDE 171 130 41 Aircraft at 3000ft above airfield level still cause considerable noise disturbance 11-

Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft arrivals / departures 68 51 17 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Nutfield --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( 32 26 6 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over AONB 651 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Ashdown Forest 11- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Bidborough --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Billingshurst 11- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Broadbridge Heath --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Cowden 11- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Crowborough 972 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Dorking 211 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Groombridge --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Hartfield --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Heathfield 2-2 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Horsham 11- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Ifold 11- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Langton Green 431 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Kent Downs --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Kingsfold --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Penshurst --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Reigate 1-1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Rowhook --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Rusper 321 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Rusthall --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Slinfold 1-1 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Southborough 11- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Surrey Hills 44- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over the Weald 11- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Tunbridge Wells 321 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Tonbridge --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Vigo --- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Waldron 2-2 Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Warnham 11- Concerns about the altitude of aircraft / low flying aircraft (arrivals / departures( over Withyham --- Existing Situation (General altitude) 119 89 30 Decreasing altitude 55 43 12

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Pulborough ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over my area 862

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Betchworth 11-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Bidborough ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Coldharbour 99-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Chiddingstone 211

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Crowborough 743

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Brockham 11-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Capel 321

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Dorking 1-1

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Dormansland ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Eridge ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Penshurst ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Fordcombe ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Furnace Wood ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Hever 11-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Holmwood 211

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Horsham 11- Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Langton Green ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Leigh 11-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Leith Hill 22-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Loxwood 211

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Nutfield 11-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Plaxtol 11-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Redhill 211

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Reigate 1-1

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Rusthall ---

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Sevenoaks --- Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over South Holmwood 11-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over The Haven 22-

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Tonbridge 11- Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Tunbridge Wells 431

Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Warnham 11- Existing aircraft altitude has decreased / lowered recently over Wisborough Green 11- Aircraft altitude too low 73 52 21 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over my area 963 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over AONB --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Ashdown Forest 211 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Ashurst --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Beare Green 22- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Betchworth 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Bidborough 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Bletchingley 1-1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Chiddingstone 44- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Crockham Hill 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Crowborough 16 10 6 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Fordcombe --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Four Elms --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Haywards Heath --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Heathfield 22- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Hever --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Holmwood 1-1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Horsham 211 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Earlswood --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Edenbridge --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Groombridge 1-1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Ifold 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Ifield --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Kingsfold --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Kirdford 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Langton Green 431 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Leigh --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Loxwood --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over North Holmwood 33- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Nutfield 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Penshurst 642 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Plaistow 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Reigate 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Redhill 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Rusper --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Salfords --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Slinfold 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over South Holmwood 11- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Southborough --- Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Speldhurst 541 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Tonbridge 1-1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Tunbridge Wells 541 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Warnham 1-1 Existing aircraft altitude is too low over Withyham --- Alternative Suggestions (General altitude) 19 16 3 Altitude limits should be adhered to / fine / penalise Gatwick for exceeding limits 431 Flight paths / NPRs should be at a higher altitude 15 13 2

Flight paths / NPRs should be at a higher altitude over Langton Green 11-

Flight paths / NPRs should be at a higher altitude over Tunbridge Wells --- GENERAL COMMUNITY / PEOPLE 288 208 80 Concerns about changes impacting more people 16 15 1 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry 25 18 7

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry from RWY08 11- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Ashdown Forest 22- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Betchworth ---

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Box Hill ---

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Brockham 33- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Chiddingstone / Chiddingstone Castle 18 15 3

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Chartwell 312 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Coldharbour 33- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Crowborough 1-1

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Dorking --- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Emmetts Garden 11- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Groombridge / Groombridge Place 66- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Hever / Hever Castle 21 18 3

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Horsham 1-1 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Knole House 312 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Langton Green 11- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Penshurst / Penshurst Place 26 23 3

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Rusper 11- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Quebec House 11- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Sevenoaks --- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in South Holmwood --- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Surrey Hills AONB 11-

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Speldhurst 211 Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Tunbridge Wells 33- Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in the High Weald AONB 211

Concerns about the impact to local businesses / tourist industry in Warnham --- Criticism of Gatwick / changes are for the benefit of GAL / GAL shareholders / Airport related businesses / to increase profit 143 100 43 Concerns about the impact on future developments 11- Concerns about the impact on education / health for schools / hospitals / nursing homes etc 28 19 9 Impact on local community / schools 103 76 27 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents 52 39 13

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Ashurst ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Betchworth 11-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Bidborough 11-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Billingshurst --- Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Broadbridge Heath ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Brockham 22-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Chiddingstone 22- Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Coldharbour 55-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Cowden 22-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Crowborough 835

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Dorking 1-1

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Dormansland 1-1

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Edenbridge 11-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Faygate ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Fordcombe 11-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Groombridge 413

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Hever 22- Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in High Weald AONB 541

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Holmwood 211

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Horsham 11- Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Ifold 22- Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Kent Downs AONB ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Kingsfold ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Langton Green 321 Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Leigh ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Marsh Green 22- Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in North Holmwood 11-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Penshurst 541

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Redhill 1-1

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Reigate 1-1

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Rusper 33-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Salfords ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Sevenoaks ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Southborough 33- Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in South Holmwood ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Southwater ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Speldhurst 431

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Stopham ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Tonbridge ---

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Tunbridge Wells 761

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Warnham 22-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Wealden AONB 11-

Concerns about the impact on local community / residents in Withyham --- Other impact 64 42 22 Concerns about the impact on the communication infrastructure / mobile telephone signal / reception etc 11- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of the area 20 10 10 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Bidborough --- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Chiddingstone 11- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Crawley 11- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Crowborough 11- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Fordcombe --- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Groombridge --- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Hever 11- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Horsham --- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Langton Green 11- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Penshurst --- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Redhill 1-1 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Rusper --- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Salfords 2-2 Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Slinfold --- Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Speldhurst 211

Concerns about the impact on the infrastructure of Tunbridge Wells 11-

Concerns about the impact on the local economy / economy will not benefit 15 11 4

Concerns about the impact on the transport infrastructure of the area 761 Lack of research into the impact of these proposals on local communities / needs in depth scientific research 18 13 5 Existing Situation - Community negatively impacted 761 Existing community are negatively impacted in my area 22- Existing community are negatively impacted in Billingshurst 11- Existing community are negatively impacted in Brockham 22- Existing community are negatively impacted in Eridge Green --- Existing community are negatively impacted in Penshurst --- Existing community are negatively impacted in Tunbridge Wells 211 Existing community are negatively impacted in Warnham --- Alternative Suggestions (General community/people) 82 52 30 Listen to views / opinions / complaints from the people 69 43 26 There needs to be a balance between the interests of GAL and those of the public / residents / affected by the changes 642

Disruption to communities / residents should be kept to a minimum 413 The quality of life / health and well-being of residents / communities should be the first consideration 862 GENERAL ENVIRONMENT 195 149 46 Concerns about the impact of light / visual pollution 44- Concerns about the impact of RWY08 on the environment 321 Concerns about the impact to the countryside / rural areas / AONB 68 56 12 Concerns about the impact to the countryside / rural areas / AONB from RWY26 --- Concerns about the impact to the countryside / rural areas / AONB from RWY08 11- Concerns about the impact to the environment 39 33 6 Concerns about the impact to air quality / of pollution 98 67 31 Concerns about the impact to historical / cultural / heritage sites / Grade I / II listed buildings 40 31 9 Concerns about the impact to air quality / of pollution from RWY08 arrival flight paths --- Concerns about the impact to nature reserves / national parks / SSSI / SPA etc 13 12 1 Concerns about the impact to wildlife / biodiversity 26 21 5 Existing Situation (General environment) 10 9 1 Existing aircraft pollution is increasing / has increased / has got worse recently ---

Existing countryside / rural areas / AONB have been negatively impacted 10 9 1 Proximity of the airport protects the countryside / wildlife from over development --- Alternative Suggestions (General environment) 88-

Air pollution should be reduced / kept to a minimum / the first consideration 88- GENERAL FREQUENCY / VOLUME 300 225 75 Concerns about the frequency / volume of flights (Net) 119 87 32 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Nutfield --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights 52 42 10 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for arrivals 55- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for departures --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for RWY26 arrivals 633

Concerns about frequency / volume of flights for RWY08 departures --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights negatively impacting desirability / character of the area --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Ashdown Forest 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Beare Green 22- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Alfold --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Betchworth 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Bidborough 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Buxted 1-1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Cowden 44- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Chiddingstone 33- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Cobham 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Crowborough 11 5 6 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Cuckfield --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Dormansland --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Eridge Green --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Fordcombe 321 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Groombridge 431 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Haywards Heath --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Heathfield 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Hever 44- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Holmwood 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Horsham ---

Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over the High Weald AONB 77-

Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Surrey Hills AONB 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Lambs Green 22- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Langton Green 752 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Leigh --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Marsh Green 22- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Lindfield --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over North Holmwood 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Rusper 5-5 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Reigate --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Penshurst 66- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Slinfold 1-1 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Southborough 11- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Speldhurst 651 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Sevenoaks --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Tunbridge Wells 761 Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Warnham --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Tonbridge --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Waldron 2-2

Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Wisborough Green --- Concerns about frequency / volume of flights over Worthing 1-1 Oppose changes to frequency / volume of arrivals 22-

Oppose changes to frequency / volume of flights / additional air traffic 25 20 5 Existing Situation (General frequency/volume) 221 167 54 Negative impact of existing flights 50 40 10

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Leith Hill ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting North Holmwood ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting my area 18 15 3 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Alfold 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Chiddingstone ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Coldharbour 33-

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Crowborough 321 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Earlswood ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Edenbridge ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Eridge Green ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Fordcombe ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Heathfield 541

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Herons Ghyll 1-1 Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Hever ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Kirdford 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Langton Green 22-

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Lingfield ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Nutfield 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Penshurst 422

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Redhill 2-2

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Reigate 3-3

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Rusper 44-

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Rusthall ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Slinfold 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Smallfield ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Speldhurst 321

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Tonbridge 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Tunbridge Wells 321

Existing frequency / volume of flights is negatively impacting Withyham --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased 175 131 44 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently 23 22 1 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Alfold / Alfold Bars 11- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Ashdown Forest 321 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Beare Green 321

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Betchworth 22-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Bidborough --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Billingshurst 22-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Brockham 55- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Bletchingley 211

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Capel 211

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Chailey --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Chiddingstone 752 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Coldharbour 88-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Copthorne --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Cowden 22-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Coneyhurst --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Crowborough 20 11 9

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Dorking 321 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Dormansland --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over East Grinstead ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Edenbridge --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Eridge Green ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Fairwarp ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Fordcombe ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Four Elms ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Frant --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Groombridge 422

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Hadlow ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Hassocks 11- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Haywards Heath ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Heathfield 1-1

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Hever 44-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Holmwood 651

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Horsham 413

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Ifold 22-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Kingsfold ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Leigh 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Leith Hill 22- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Lamberhurst --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Langton Green 10 8 2

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Loxwood 413

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Mark Cross --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over North Holmwood 44-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Penshurst 541

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Petsworth 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Plaistow 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Plaxtol 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Pootings 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Pulborough --- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Redhill 321

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Reigate ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Rowhook ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Rusthall ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Salfords 1-1

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Rusper 633

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Seaford ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Sevenoaks 11- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over South Holmwood 871 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Southborough 22-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Slinfold 321

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Speldhurst 44- Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over the Surrey Hills AONB 211 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over the Kent Downs AONB 11-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over The Haven 22-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Tonbridge 211 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Tunbridge Wells 871

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Vigo ---

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Warnham 716 Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Wisborough Green 22-

Existing frequency / volume of flights has increased recently over Withyham ---

Frequency / volume of flights negatively impacts populated / residential areas 22- Frequency / volume of flights negatively impacts quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 15 13 2 Alternative Suggestions (General frequency/volume) 1-1 Frequency / volume of flights should be reduced 1-1 Frequency / volume of flights should be reduced on the SFD route --- GENERAL HOUSING / PROPERTY 206 141 65

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to the Surrey Hills to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11-

Concerns about the impact on new / additional housing developments 642 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Ashurst to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 28 21 7 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Betchworth to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 431 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Bidborough to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths ---

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Billingshurst to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Blackbrook to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths ---

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Bletchingley to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Brenchley to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Brockham to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 33- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Buxted to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Capel to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Charlwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths ---

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Chiddingstone to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 752 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Cobham to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11-

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Coldharbour to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 22-

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Crowborough to avoid aircraft noise / flight path 422 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Dorking to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to East Grinstead to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Edenbridge to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Eridge to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Felbridge to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Heathfield to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Hever to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths ---

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to High Weald AONB to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Holmwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 22- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Horsham to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 853 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Ifold to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Kingsfold to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Kirdford to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths ---

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Lambs Green to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11-

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Langton Green to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 321 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Leigh to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Leith Hill to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Loxwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 312

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to North Holmwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 321 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Nutfield to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Oxted to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Penshurst to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Plaistow to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Pulborough to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Redhill to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Reigate to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Rowhook to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Rusper to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 761 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Rusthall to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Seaford to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Sevenoaks to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Slinfold to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 211

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to South Holmwood to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 321

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Southborough to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 11- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Speldhurst to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 33- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Tonbridge to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths ---

Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Tunbridge Wells to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 33- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Vigo to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths --- Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Wadhurst to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Waldron to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Warnham to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 10 2 8 Concerns about the impact on people who bought property / paid a premium / moved to Worthing to avoid aircraft noise / flight paths 1-1 Concerns about the impact on property / house prices 127 86 41 Existing Situation (General housing/property) 63 47 16 Concerns about compensation / compensation scheme is inadequate / compensation is not a solution 37 27 10

Concerns about noise insulation / double glazing scheme is inadequate 15 9 6 People bought property cheaply knowing they were near an airport / flight path / subject to noise 13 12 1 Alternative suggestions (General housing/property) 26 25 1 Compensation should be made available to anyone suffering negative impacts 23 22 1 Compulsory purchase scheme should be initiated 11- The Land Compensation Act should be amended to apply to 'new super- highways in the sky' / for properties devalued as a result of concentrated flight paths 55- GENERAL NOISE 407 291 116 I am not affected / this area is not affected by noise / listen to views of those affected --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas 20 16 4 Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Arun Valley --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Ashurst Wood --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Betchworth 11- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Brenchley --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Brockham 33- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Coldharbour 11- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Coneyhurst --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Copthorne 11-

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Cranleigh --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Crowborough 752

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Cuckfield --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Downs Link --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like East Grinstead --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Fordcombe ---

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Frant --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like The Haven 33- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Haywards Heath --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Holmwood ---

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Horsham 321 Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Kent Downs 11-

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Kingsfold 1-1 Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Langton Green 431

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Leigh ---

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Lingfield --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like North Holmwood 11- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Penshurst 66-

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Plaistow 22-

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Pootings 11-

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Reigate 1-1

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Rowhook ---

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Rusper 55- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Sevenoaks ---

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Slinfold 321 Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Southborough --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like South Holmwood 11- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Speldhurst --- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Storrington 11- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like the Surrey Hills 33-

Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Toys Hill 11- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Tunbridge Wells 22- Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Warnham 945 Aircraft noise will negatively impact previously unaffected areas like Wisborough Green 22- Aircraft noise will negatively impact residents / communities living beneath the centre line 22- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise 45 37 8 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise over populated areas 541 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for departures heading South --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise / flight paths for RWY08 departures on Crowborough --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise from RWY08 817 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise from RWY26 10 3 7 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Alfold ---

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Ashdown Forest 321 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Ashurst --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Beare Green 312 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Betchworth 4-4 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Bidborough 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Billingshurst 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Blackbrook ---

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Broadbridge Heath 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Brockham 22- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Buckland --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Capel 1-1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Chartwell 2-2 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Chiddingstone 862 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Coldharbour 211 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Cowden 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Crawley --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Crowborough 532 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Cuckfield --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Dormansland 1-1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Earlswood --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around East Grinstead --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Edenbridge --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Faygate --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Felcourt --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Fordcombe --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Furnace Wood ---

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Grenehurst Park --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Groombridge 541

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Haywards Heath --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Heathfield 1-1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Hever 633 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Holmwood --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Horsham 10 5 5 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Ifold --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Knole Park 2-2 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Lambs Green 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Langton Green 99- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Leigh 211 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Lindield --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Penshurst 12 9 3 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Plaistow --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Ramsgate 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Redhill 2-2 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Reigate 3-3 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Rudgwick --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Rusper 615 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Rusthall --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Salfords 1-1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Sevenoaks --- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Slinfold 734 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Southborough 11- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Speldhurst 55- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around the South Downs National Park 22-

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around South Holmwood 22- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Tonbridge ---

Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Tunbridge Wells 44- Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Waldron 1-1 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Warnham 615 Concerns about the impact of aircraft noise around Worthing 1-1

Concerns about the impact of concentrating noise / disturbance to an area 972 GAL / airlines are not meeting EU guidelines on noise 532 Impact of aircraft noise depends of surrounding geography / buildings reflecting sound 211 Oppose changes to / increases in noise / additional aircraft noise 20 16 4 Proposals do not meet Government guidelines on the reduction of people affected by noise from low level air traffic 14 7 7 Existing Situation (General noise) 314 218 96 Aircraft noise can still be heard from aircraft above 4000 feet 33- Aircraft noise is dependent on aircraft type 15 13 2 Aircraft noise is dependent on altitude / height of aircraft 33- Aircraft noise is dependent on proximity of aircraft ---

Aircraft noise is greater when engines whine / planes turn / begin descent 24 18 6 Aircraft noise negatively impacts desirability / character of the area 66- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations 972

Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Bidborough 11-

Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Coldharbour 981

Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Crowborough 11 8 3

Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Groombridge 11- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Horsham ---

Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Kent Downs AONB 66-

Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Kentish Hills 11- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Kingsfold --- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Leigh Hill 11- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Leith Hill 431 Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Nutley --- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Sevenoaks ---

Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Southborough --- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Speldhurst --- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Tonbridge --- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Toys Hill 11-

Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Tunbridge Wells --- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Rusper 532 Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Rowhook --- Aircraft noise negatively impacts elevated locations like Warnham 2-2 Aircraft noise negatively impacts populated / residential areas / more than rural areas / countryside / AONB 12 8 4

Aircraft noise negatively impacts quality of life / health and well-being / sleep 54 30 24 Aircraft noise negatively impacts rural areas / countryside / AONB / more than populated / residential areas 48 36 12 Continuous climb has no relevance to the reduction of low-level noise from departing aircraft 11- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently 23 20 3

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Alfold 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Beare Green 541 Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Betchworth 321

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Bidborough ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Billingshurst 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Brockham 66-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Capel 312

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Chalwood --- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Chiddingstone 642

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Coldharbour 77-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Cowden 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Crowborough 19 9 10

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Cuckfield ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Dorking 431

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Dormansland ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Earlswood --- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in East Grinstead ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Eridge Green ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Fairwarp 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Felbridge 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Fordcombe --- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Furnace Wood ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Groombridge 651 Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Haywards Heath ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Hassocks 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Heathfield 1-1

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Hever 22-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Holmwood 22-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Horley 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Horsham 11 4 7

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Ifold 11- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Langton Green 312

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Leigh 1-1

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Leith Hill 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Lindfield ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Loxwood 413

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Newdigate --- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in North Holmwood 752

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Nutfield 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Oxted 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Penshurst 431

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Plaistow 22-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Plaxtol 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Redhill 725

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Reigate 615

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Rusper 12 4 8

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Rusthall 1-1

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Salfords 1-1

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Seaford 11-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Sevenoaks 22- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Southborough 44- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in South Holmwood 651

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Speldhurst 651

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Strood Green ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in The Haven 33-

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Tonbridge 11- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Tunbridge Wells 761

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Vigo ---

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Wadhurst 1-1

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Warnham 826

Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Westerham --- Existing aircraft noise has increased / has got worse recently in Wisborough Green --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts my area 15 12 3 Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts village schools beneath 743 Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Alfold 11- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Ashdown Forest --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Arun Valley --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Beare Green 11- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Bidborough 11- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Billingshurst --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Bletchingley 11- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Capel 321 Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Chiddingstone / Chiddingstone Castle 55- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Cobham 11- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Coldharbour 22- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Copthorne --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Cross-in-Hand 11- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Crowborough 13 7 6 Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Dormansland --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Earlswood --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Edenbridge --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Godstone --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Heathfield 321 Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Hever / Hever Castle 11- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Holmwood 11- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Horley --- Existing aircraft noise negatively impacts Horsham 862

London Airspace Change: Gatwick Local Area Consultation 2014 ---- Final Report 138

For more information

Ipsos MORI 79-81 Borough Road London SE1 1FY t: +44 (0)20 7347 3000 f: +44 (0)20 7347 3800 www.ipsos-mori.com www.twitter.com/IpsosMORI

About Ipsos MORI’s Social Research Institute The Social Research Institute works closely with national government, local public services and the not-for-profit sector. Its 200 research staff focus on public service and policy issues. Each has expertise in a particular part of the public sector, ensuring we have a detailed understanding of specific sectors and policy challenges. This, combined with our methodological and communications expertise, ensures that our research makes a difference for decision makers and communities.