Assessing the Role of Distributed Power Systems in the U.S. Power Sector

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessing the Role of Distributed Power Systems in the U.S. Power Sector Energy Security Initiative at BROOKINGS Assessing the Role of Distributed Power Systems in the U.S. Power Sector A Report by: The Brookings Institution Energy Security Initiative The Hoover Institution Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy OCTOBER 2011 Energy Security Initiative at BROOKINGS Assessing the Role of Distributed Power Systems in the U.S. Power Sector A Report by: The Brookings Institution Energy Security Initiative The Hoover Institution Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy OCTOBER 2011 About The Brookings Energy Security Initiative The Energy Security Initiative (ESI) is a cross-program effort by the Brookings Institution designed to foster multidisciplinary research and dialogue on all aspects of energy security. ESI recognizes that public and private choices related to energy production and use will shape the global economic, environmental and strategic landscape in profound ways and that achieving a more secure future will therefore require a determined effort to understand the likely consequences of these choices and their implications for sound policymaking. The ESI Policy Brief Series is intended to showcase serious and focused scholar- ship on topical issues in one or more of these broad research areas, with an emphasis on targeted policy recommendations. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment, and the analysis and recommendations of the Institution’s scholars are not determined by any donation. Contact for the Energy Security Initiative: Govinda Avasarala Research Assistant (202) 797-6231 [email protected] About The Hoover Institution’s Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy The Hoover Institution’s Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy addresses energy policy in the United States and its effects on our domestic and international political priorities, particularly our na- tional security. As a result of volatile and rising energy prices and increasing global concern about climate change, two related and compelling issues—threats to national security and adverse effects of energy usage on global climate—have emerged as key adjuncts to America’s energy policy; the task force explores these subjects in detail. The task force’s goals are to gather comprehensive information on current scientific and tech- nological developments, survey the contingent policy actions, and offer a range of prescriptive policies to address our varied energy challenges. The task force focuses on public policy at all levels, from individual to global. It recommends policy initiatives, large and small, that can be undertaken to the advantage of both private enterprises and governments acting individually and in concert. Contact for the Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy Jeremy Carl Research Fellow 650-723-2136 [email protected] assessing THE rolE OF distribuTEd PO wER SystemS In THE u.S . POwER sector II Foreword The provision of reliable and secure energy to Many energy analysts have noted the potential meet the growing demands of this century, in a for DPS to become a major part of our electric- way which mitigates the adverse effects of climate ity infrastructure. The recent drop in key tech- change, is an existential challenge to the human nology costs has brought this potential closer to enterprise. A failure to meet the challenge would reality. But in this rapidly developing field, the pose grave risks to the functioning of world econ- great progress on the technological front has yet omies, the nature of societies and our endangered to be fully matched by progress in policy making. ecosphere. In fact, the degree of success in this And major questions of affordability, integration, area will be a big determinant of whether this will and security remain to be answered before we can be the best or the worst century for humankind. determine what role distributed energy sources should play in our future energy system. One proposed method for improving the eco- nomic, environmental and energy-security per- DPS offers the potential for more reliable, secure, formance of the U.S. power sector is the adoption and green energy. It can encompass everything of distributed power systems (DPS), a combina- from fuel cells providing electricity and clean wa- tion of distributed generation and electricity stor- ter to a remote army outpost in Afghanistan to age technologies. In this inter-disciplinary paper, solar panels on the roof of a home in Arizona. At scholars from the Brookings Institution’s Energy the same time, possible pitfalls related to DPS use Security Initiative and the Hoover Institution’s must be seriously and realistically addressed be- Energy Task Force evaluate the case for greater fore we make a major commitment to a distrib- deployment of DPS. The chapters which follow uted energy future. set out a number of considered conclusions and clear recommendations for all policy makers who This report provides a comprehensive survey of have a responsibility for ensuring the security and the current technology and policy landscape of sustainability of our energy system now and for DPS and offers recommendations for its future future generations. use. As it highlights the importance of an emerg- ing, critical policy issue that has not received the Strobe Talbott full attention it merits until now, we believe the President report will be useful to policy makers and practi- Brookings Institution tioners alike. George P. Shultz Thomas W. and Susan B. Ford Distinguished Fellow The Hoover Institution assessing THE rolE OF distribuTEd PO wER SystemS In THE u.S . POwER sector III Acknowledgements he authors would like to thank a number of people involved in the research, writing and production of this study. First, they would like to thank Charles Ebinger, the director of the Brookings Energy TSecurity Initiative, and George Shultz, chair of the Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy at the Hoover Institution, who conceived of the project. Ebinger provided insights to the conclusions and recommendations, and was a keen reviewer of many iterations of the report. Secretary Shultz of- fered key strategic direction, valuable critiques of early drafts, and an invaluable perspective and insights from his extensive expeience in policymaking at the highest levels. Ambassador Thomas Stephenson has supported the Work of the Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy with both his generosity and his counsel. The authors would also like to thank Yinuo Geng and Caldwell Bailey for their significant substantive contributions to the report and Govinda Avasarala for his input and coordination efforts. Brandon Smith served as intern on this project and was helpful with research assistance. The author’s owe a special thanks to Richard Kauffman, Nathan Hultman, Snuller Price, Bradley Schoener and Ted Piccone for their timely reviews and feedback. The authors are also grateful to the academics, government and industry officials and regulators for responding to various survey requests and for being so forthcoming with their experience and insights. Gail Chalef, Robin Johnson and Chris Krupinski were invaluable in the editing, proofreading and printing process. assessing THE rolE OF distribuTEd PO wER SystemS In THE u.S . POwER sector Iv the Authors This report was co-written by authors from the Brookings Institution and the Hoover Institution. The Brookings Institution The Hoover Institution John Banks Jeremy Carl Nonresident Fellow, Energy Security Initiative Research Fellow, The Hoover Institution The Brookings Institution Director of Research, Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy Kevin Massy Assistant Director, Energy Security Initiative Amy Guy Wagner The Brookings Institution Senior Consultant E3 Lisa Wood Executive Director Pedram Mokrian Institute for Electric Efficiency Principal Nonresident Fellow, Energy Security Initiative Mayfield Fund The Brookings Institution Contributor, Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy The Hoover Institution Jelena Simjanovic Senior Research Assistant, Shultz-Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy The Hoover Institution David Slayton Commander, United States Navy National Security Affairs Fellow The Hoover Institution assessing THE rolE OF distribuTEd PO wER SystemS In THE u.S . POwER sector v tAble oF contents LIST OF ACRONYMS................................................................... viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................x INTRODUCTION ........................................................................1 CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW OF DISTRIBUTED POWER SYSTEMS ...........................4 1.1 DPS in context.....................................................................4 1.2 Definitions .......................................................................6 1.3 Overview of DPS Technology .......................................................9 Solar .............................................................................9 Wind ............................................................................10 Combustion Engines ..............................................................11 Microturbines ....................................................................12 Combined Heat and Power (CHP)...................................................13 Microhydropower .................................................................14
Recommended publications
  • Tesla Motors
    AUGUST 2014 TESLA MOTORS: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OPEN INNOVATION, AND THE CARBON CRISIS DR MATTHEW RIMMER AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH COUNCIL FUTURE FELLOW ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW The Australian National University College of Law, Canberra, ACT, 0200 Work Telephone Number: (02) 61254164 E-Mail Address: [email protected] 1 Introduction Tesla Motors is an innovative United States manufacturer of electric vehicles. In its annual report for 2012, the company summarizes its business operations: We design, develop, manufacture and sell high-performance fully electric vehicles and advanced electric vehicle powertrain components. We own our sales and service network and have operationally structured our business in a manner that we believe will enable us to rapidly develop and launch advanced electric vehicles and technologies. We believe our vehicles, electric vehicle engineering expertise, and operational structure differentiates us from incumbent automobile manufacturers. We are the first company to commercially produce a federally-compliant electric vehicle, the Tesla Roadster, which achieves a market-leading range on a single charge combined with attractive design, driving performance and zero tailpipe emissions. As of December 31, 2012, we had delivered approximately 2,450 Tesla Roadsters to customers in over 30 countries. While we have concluded the production run of the Tesla Roadster, its proprietary electric vehicle powertrain system is the foundation of our business. We modified this system
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao
    William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 37 | Issue 2 Article 4 Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao Repository Citation Hilary Kao, Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program, 37 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 425 (2013), http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol37/iss2/4 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr BEYOND SOLYNDRA: EXAMINING THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM HILARY KAO* ABSTRACT In the year following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, the renewable and clean energy industries faced significant turmoil— from natural disasters, to political maelstroms, from the Great Recession, to U.S. debt ceiling debates. The Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program (“DOE LGP”), often a target since before it ever received a dollar of appropriations, has been both blamed and defended in the wake of the bankruptcy filing of Solyndra, a California-based solar panel manufac- turer, in September 2011, because of the $535 million loan guarantee made to it by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) in 2009.1 Critics have suggested political favoritism in loan guarantee awards and have questioned the government’s proper role in supporting renewable energy companies and the renewable energy industry generally.2 This Article looks beyond the Solyndra controversy to examine the origin, structure and purpose of the DOE LGP. It asserts that loan guaran- tees can serve as viable policy tools, but require careful crafting to have the potential to be effective programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla, Inc. Form 10-K Annual Report Filed 2017-03-01
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 2017-03-01 | Period of Report: 2016-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0001564590-17-003118 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Tesla, Inc. Mailing Address Business Address 3500 DEER CREEK RD 3500 DEER CREEK RD CIK:1318605| IRS No.: 912197729 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 PALO ALTO CA 94070 PALO ALTO CA 94070 Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-34756 | Film No.: 17655025 650-681-5000 SIC: 3711 Motor vehicles & passenger car bodies Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-34756 Tesla, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 91-2197729 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 3500 Deer Creek Road Palo Alto, California 94304 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (650) 681-5000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.001 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Loan Guarantee Commitments
    Department of Energy Loan Guarantee Program: Current Loan Guarantee Commitments Passed as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Title XVII Loan Guarantee Program has $34 billion in authority to give loan guarantees to innovative technologies. 1 The 1705 program also had about $2.4 billion in Recovery Act funds to pay for the credit subsidy cost for renewable and energy efficiency projects, but those funds expired on September 30, 2011. So far, the DOE has finalized $16.13 billion worth of loans and committed $10.65 billion. Below is a list of applicants that have a committed or finalized loan; there are other companies that are in the process of applying for a loan and at least one company that has rejected the loan terms offered by the DOE. Nuclear Power Facilities Current DOE loan guarantee authority for the financing of nuclear projects is set at $18.5 billion with an additional $4 billion now identified for uranium enrichment (see see front-end nuclear cycle below).1 President Obama is requesting more. In both his FY2011 and FY2012 budgets, he included an additional $36 billion in loan guarantee authority for nuclear reactors. If his FY2012 budget is approved, loan guarantee authority for nuclear reactors would total roughly $50 billion. This authority is under the 1703 program. So far, only one nuclear company, Southern Company, has been offered a conditional commitment. Constellation Energy was in extensive negotiations with the DOE over a loan guarantee but backed out after citing the “unreasonably burdensome” cost associated with the loan guarantee the DOE offered and claimed that it would “create unacceptable risks and costs for our company.”2 Other nuclear companies are currently under review for a loan guarantee and rely on reactor designs that are currently in use in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SLUSH FUND a Felony Organized Crime Using Taxpayer Funds and Stock Market Manipulation for Quid Pro Quo Payola and Money-Laundering
    THE SLUSH FUND A Felony Organized Crime Using Taxpayer Funds And Stock Market Manipulation For Quid Pro Quo Payola And Money-Laundering 1 Draft Revision #4 – Download this document again in 30 days for updates A crime investigation provided to the public and to every federal law enforcement agency Notes: This is a Public Domain report. Protected under Non-Commercial and News Material Fair Use; Freedom-of-The-Press rights; U.S. First Amendment; SLAPP/Anti-SLAPP; UN Rights Protections; GDPR Compliance; Section 203 protections – U.S.; ACLU litigation warning; ICIJ investigations and related protections. Authored via Wikipedia and WikiLawPedia process via internet users. References and validation links are contained within the body of the document. We lost tens of millions of dollars because the White House, the Department of Energy and their tech financiers defrauded us and then put a hit-job on us for reporting this crime. State and Federal officials are still covering this up and refusing to allow our case into a jury trial. Congressional, private and federal investigators hunted every single one of the crooks and attackers down for us and we are shaming every single one of them FOREVER! 2 Table of Contents THE SLUSH FUND..................................................................................................................................1 Overview:...................................................................................................................................................5 The Whorehouse Lender............................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Solar Financing
    RESIDENTIAL solar Financing Strategic and legal support in the residential solar space The solar energy MARKET is rapidly expanding. Having the right counsel can be a competitive advantage. The new wave of solar power is on the residential rooftop, using the third-party solar lease or power purchase agreement model, shifting high upfront capital costs from homeowners to third-party investors. New renewable energy equity funds are being created to support the purchase and installation of millions of dollars in residential solar systems across the United States, which, if properly structured, benefit from federal, state, and local tax benefits, as well as other incentives. With large institutions viewing this as a smart, profitable and practical investment, we expect to see a uptick in the pace and number of increasingly, larger-scale residential solar- lease transactions. Nixon Peabody has been an integral part of this burgeoning industry and has led the way in developing key documentation and tax analysis. We regularly appear at industry conferences addressing these structures and we have been pioneers in combining multiple sources of capital in single transactions. Our depth of experience allows us to expeditiously handle residential solar funding projects requiring fast turnaround and to provide outstanding client service. We are one of the nation’s preemi- nent law firms in structuring and closing investments in tax credit and energy transactions, and we understand the complexities of the Energy Investment Tax Credit, cash payment in lieu of energy tax credits, New Market Tax Credits and partnership tax law. We are a leader in helping developers, owners, lenders, and investors leverage available resources to structure these powerful renewable energy tax credits and related tools in creative project financing structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Espagne : Information Et Énergie : Les Deux Moteurs De La Ville Durable
    Espagne : Information et énergie : les deux moteurs de la ville durable L'information : un moyen et non une fin Dans l'imaginaire collectif, le concept de ville intelligente renvoie l'image d'une ville bourrée de capteurs et de dispositifs d'information. La présence de toutes ces nouvelles technologies d'information semble ainsi être l'essence même de ce qui va caractériser la ville de demain. Hors rien n'est plus réducteur que cette vision. Les dispositifs d'information sont au coeur de la ville intelligente mais leur présence ne transforme pas la ville perse. Les capteurs et dispositifs d'information ont pour but de rassembler un certain nombre de données afin de rendre la prise de décision plus efficace. Mais pour cela, encore faut-il mesurer les bons paramètres. Les nouvelles technologies doivent être ainsi bien pensées et utilisées afin de poser les bases de la ville intelligente. La technologie est juste une aide pour assurer une bonne gouvernance. Et, à ce titre, certaines questions se posent. Jusqu'à quel niveau d'information aller ? A quel coût ? Qui va être en charge de la collecte et de l'analyse de toutes ces informations ? La démocratisation de l'information et de son échange qui font qu'aujourd'hui plus de 9 milliards d'appareils sont reliés à internet permet d'imaginer la ville de demain comme un ordinateur ouvert. Il reste à créer pour relier les composants de cet ordinateur un système d'exploitation urbain qui permettrait d'assurer une bonne organisation de ces systèmes d'information et de tirer parti au mieux des données récoltées.
    [Show full text]
  • Doe Loan Guarantees
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees GAO March 2012 DOE LOAN GUARANTEES Further Actions Are Needed to Improve Tracking and Review of Applications GAO-12-157 March 2012 DOE LOAN GUARANTEES Further Actions Are Needed to Improve Tracking and Review of Applications Highlights of GAO-12-157, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Department of Energy’s (DOE) The Department of Energy (DOE) has made $15 billion in loan guarantees and Loan Guarantee Program (LGP) was conditionally committed to an additional $15 billion, but the program does not created by section 1703 of the Energy have the consolidated data on application status needed to facilitate efficient Policy Act of 2005 to guarantee loans management and program oversight. For the 460 applications to the Loan for innovative energy projects. Guarantee Program (LGP), DOE has made loan guarantees for 7 percent and Currently, DOE is authorized to make committed to an additional 2 percent. The time the LGP took to review loan up to $34 billion in section 1703 loan applications decreased over the course of the program, according to GAO’s guarantees. In February 2009, the analysis of LGP data. However, when GAO requested data from the LGP on the American Recovery and Reinvestment status of these applications, the LGP did not have consolidated data readily Act added section 1705, making available and had to assemble these data over several months from various certain commercial technologies that could start construction by September sources. Without consolidated data on applicants, LGP managers do not have 30, 2011, eligible for loan guarantees.
    [Show full text]
  • Army and Renewable Energy
    ON POINT FOR THE NATION: ARMY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY Jeremy S. Scholtes* “It’s operationally necessary, it’s fiscally prudent, and it’s mission essential for us to make sure that we have energy security and can perform our primary mission for the United States.”1 Synopsis: This article explores the U.S. Army’s efforts to incorporate renewable energy into its mission at home and abroad. It explains to the reader why the Army needs and wants renewable energy as part of its overall strategy to strengthen national security and improve its operational capabilities. The article then introduces the reader to the strategic framework which set the Army’s overall goals and shaped the landscape for development and implementation of a number of wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass projects. After an evaluation of many of the projects implemented on Army installations and in the deployed and operational setting, the author identifies some remaining challenges and offers several recommendations for enhancing the Army’s capacity to further develop, implement, and expand renewable energy projects. I. Introduction ............................................................................................... 57 II. The Road to Renewables ........................................................................... 58 A. Wake-Up Call .................................................................................... 58 1. Climate Change and Energy Consumption ................................... 58 2. Reduce Price Volatility, Increase Energy Independence &
    [Show full text]
  • Seconde Vie Stationnaire Pour Les Batteries Automobiles
    Ambassade de France à Washington Mission pour la Science et la Technologie 4101 Reservoir Road, NW - Washington, DC 20007 Tél. : +1 202 944 6249 Fax : +1 202 944 6219 Mail : [email protected] URL : http://www.ambafrance-us.org Domaine : Energie & Environnement Document : Rapport d’Ambassade / Consulat Général de France à San Francisco, Californie Titre : Rapport de la mission « Solar Tech Tour 2011 » Auteur : Pauline Caumon, Thomas Deschamps, Marc Magaud, Gabriel Marty Date : Février 2012 Contact SST : [email protected] Mots-clefs : énergie, électricité, solaire, photovoltaïque, recherche, startup, industrie, politique, université, mission. Résumé : L’attractivité de l’énergie photovoltaïque, notamment par rapport aux énergies fossiles, tient au fait qu’elle n’émet pas de CO2 à l’utilisation et fonctionne à l’aide d’une ressource inépuisable, gratuite et disponible sur l’ensemble de la planète. Elle représente cependant encore nettement moins de 1% de l’électricité produite mondialement car le prix des modules photovoltaïques était jusqu’ici prohibitif pour une commercialisation de grande envergure. Des progrès techniques continus, rapides et structurels, combinés à une large surcapacité mondiale de production conjoncturelle changent aujourd’hui la donne. Fin 2011, grâce à une réduction de prix spectaculaire en partie portée par la forte production asiatique, les modules photovoltaïques se vendent au-dessous du prix mythique d’un dollar par watt-crête (Wc). Le coût d’investissement global des centrales (CAPEX) était estimé en 2011 entre 3,8 $/Wc et 4,4 $/Wc. Aux États-Unis comme ailleurs, le rythme de développement des projets photovoltaïques est en forte augmentation mais les temps sont durs pour les producteurs de modules.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program
    William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 37 (2012-2013) Issue 2 Article 4 March 2013 Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, and the Environmental Law Commons Repository Citation Hilary Kao, Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program, 37 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 425 (2013), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol37/ iss2/4 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr BEYOND SOLYNDRA: EXAMINING THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM HILARY KAO* ABSTRACT In the year following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, the renewable and clean energy industries faced significant turmoil— from natural disasters, to political maelstroms, from the Great Recession, to U.S. debt ceiling debates. The Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program (“DOE LGP”), often a target since before it ever received a dollar of appropriations, has been both blamed and defended in the wake of the bankruptcy filing of Solyndra, a California-based solar panel manufac- turer, in September 2011, because of the $535 million loan guarantee made to it by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) in 2009.1 Critics have suggested political favoritism in loan guarantee awards and have questioned the government’s proper role in supporting renewable energy companies and the renewable energy industry generally.2 This Article looks beyond the Solyndra controversy to examine the origin, structure and purpose of the DOE LGP.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal ·Electricity ·Water ·Nuclear Energy ·New Energy
    ENERGY WeChat Official Accounts / 微信公众号:麦肯息讯报告 Vol.153,2016 ·oil ·natural gas ·wind ·solar ·biofuels ·ore ·coal ·electricity ·water ·nuclear energy ·new energy 扫一扫 了解更多 Scan For More Information Mcanxixun Information and News Service Mcanxixun Information Contents New Energy(新能源) ...................................................................................................... 5 India’s solar dream rests on Chinese imports .................................................................................................... 5 印度太阳能之梦仰仗中国出口 ............................................................................................................... 6 DP Energy greenlighted for 168.5MW solar in South Australian hybrid park .................................................. 7 DP Energy 南澳大利亚混合动力园区 168.5MW 太阳能获得批准 ....................................................... 8 India’s SECI releases draft scheme for 1GW rooftop solar on government buildings ...................................... 9 印度 SECI 对政府大楼 1GW 屋顶太阳能发布计划草案 ...................................................................... 9 Daqo sets new polysilicon production and revenue records ............................................................................ 10 大全多晶硅生产和收入创新纪录 ......................................................................................................... 12 Vivint Solar raising prices as growth flattens .................................................................................................. 14 Vivint Solar 由于增长趋平提高价格 ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]