DOCSLIB.ORG

E Ir Sof L Ri Ges Ire COUNTY BOUNDARY CHANGES F'orewori)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
E Ir Sof L Ri Ges Ire COUNTY BOUNDARY CHANGES F'orewori) e ir sof L ri ges ire COUNTY BOUNDARY CHANGES F'OREWORI) This Checklist commemorates the 75th anniversary of the Cambridge Bird Club. It is the fnst avifauna to cover the whole of present-day Cambridgeshire (plus Peterborough Unitary Authority). Previously, The Birds of Cambridgeshire (Bircham 1989) and The Birds of Huntingdon and Peterborough (Clark 1996) used the 1965 county boundaries (see maps opposite). I would like to thank the members of the Checklist Working Party, namely Richard Allison, Steve Cooper, Alan Hitchings, Bruce Martin and Richard Patient, for their constant help and support during the preparation ofthis publication. Thanks also to CliffCarson and Jonathan Taylor for checking the Ouse and Nene Washes data respectively and to Richard Patient for assisting me with the proof-reading. Many thanks to all those who provided illustrations. The front cover by Richard Fowling is a HT'NTINGDONSHIRE striking painting in his own inimitable style. On the back cover, miniatures by Graham Easy (shown actual size) are some of the earliest work of this talented artist. We are much indebted to Hugh Ennion and the estate of Eric Ennion for permission to publish the incomparable line drawings. Thanks are also due to Robin Chittenden, Iain Leach and Alan Tate for permission to CAIT,IBRIDGESHTRE publish their excellent photographs. In addition, local photographers, Richard Allison, Stuart Elsom, Bob Frost, Da:ren Frost, David Gameq Bruce Martin, Jeremy Milne, John Parsloq Richard Patient, Richard Porter and Dick Seamons, have generously provided previously unpublished material of great value. Finally, I would'like to thank Roger Clarke and Stuart Elsom for their help in acquiring illustrations. The Soke of Peterborough became Peterborough and the IsIe of Ely independant of Northamptonshire. Iost their separate ldentlttes. John S.Clark Line drawings All line drawings are by the late Eric Ennion. We are much indebted to Oxford University Press for permission to publish the drawing of a Shelduck from Life on the Seashore by E.A.R.Ennion (1948). \ Cover illustrations \ ,t The frontcover, by Richard Fowling, depicts Red-necked Grebe, Baill-on's Crake andMoustached CA}4BRIDGESHIRE I Warbler. For each of these species the first county breeding record was also the first for the /l a British Isles. I . \ al \-l | The back cover, by Graham Easy, depicts a Squacco Heron at Chesterton Fen, Wryneck and -)l \ -t-t Hippolais warbler at Milton and Pectoral and Curlew Sandpipers at Cambridge sewage farm. All were recorded and painted in 1954. Cambridgeshire and Huntingdonshire Peterborough became a unitary ISBN No.O 902038 13 3 were amalgamated. authority. THE BIRDS OF CAMBRIDGESHIRE: CHECKLIST 2OOO Published by the Cambridge Bird Club in September 2000 INTRODUCTION TO SYSTEMATIC LIST THE OUSEAND NENE WASHES, BOTH INTERNATIONALLYIMPORTANT SITES A}[D APPENDICES I.[I Intemationally important sites regularly hold in excess of 20,000 waterfowl (geese and ducks) orloloormoreofthe'flyway'populationofaparticularspecies. Overafiveyearperiod(1993/ RECORDS, STATUS CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS 94-1997 198) peak counts of waterfowl averaged 65,792 ar Ouse Washes and 33,7 59 at Nene Record Lists: complete lists of records are provided for species with five or fewer records Washes. In this publication all counts of the commoner wintering waterfowl on the Ouse Record Totals: these axe provided for species with 100 or fewerrecords (unless stated otherwise). Washes include the section in Norfolk (see map on inside back cover). The record totals are in bold, next to the species name, with the number of individuals this representsinbracketse.C.2Q),c.18(154). AsingleobservationofanindividuaVflockcounts WISBECH SEWAGE FARM as one record. Further observations ofthe same individual/flock, even at different sites, have Formerly situated just outside Cambridgeshire on the Norfolk/Lincolnshire border. A number not been added to the total. However, determining whether a succession of sightings comprised of records refer to birds 'near Wisbech SF'which were seen just inside Cambridgeshire by the the same or different individuals/flocks has led to some rather arbitrary decisions. Probables River Nene. have been omitted including all references to pratincoles, skuas and petrels not specifically identified. THE BRrrrSH LrST - CATEGORTSATTON OF SPECIES (BOU 1998) Record Frequency: the number of years in which a species has been recorded during the Categories A, B and C (species on the British List). 1990s. Species recorded in 7-9 years are said to be 'almost annual' and species recorded in all Categories D and E (species not on the British List). 10 years are 'annual'. Category A: species recorded in an apparently natural state at least once since lst Jan 1950. Record Averages: the average number per yeax (e.g.) ofrecords during the 1990s, shown as Category B: species recorded in an apparently nahrral state before 1950 but not subsequently. av.8/vear. Category C: introduced species (originally releases or escapees) with self-supporting Category Freqaency Breeding Pairs Mnter or pssssge populations. Some species (e.g. Red Kite) are in both A and C. Very rare 1- in total I - 10 10 in total Category D: species not in Category A or B because there is reasonable doubt that they have years Rare 0-6 11+ in total 11+ in total ever occurred naturally. Scarce 7 -10 years 0-l0 peryear 0-20 per year Category E: includes potential Category C species (releases/escapees) which may occasionally Uncommon all 10 years Il-100 per year 2t-200 per year but have yet to form self-supporting populations. Fairly common all l0 years 101-1000 per year 201-2000 per year breed Common all 10 years 1001-3000 per year 2001-6000 per year SYSTEMATIC LIST (p.4 to 34) Very common all 10 years 3001-9000 per year 6001-18000 per year Abundant all 10 years 9001+ per year I 8000+ per year Nomenclature and Sequence: follows Voous's List of Recent Holarctic Species (BOU 1977, revised edition) and subsequent amendments as notified by BOU in Ibis. Subspecific Vagrant: a bird well outside its usual range. nomenclature follows BllP. Connon names in everyday use are in bold face. Alternative Imlptive visitor: periodic/irregular occuffence outside its usual range. names, as published in The British Z,'sl (BOU 1998), are in plain face (in brackets). Passage migrant: implies spring and autumn unless stated otherwise. Systematic List: comprises a total of 324 species on the British List (Categories A-C) which Migratory breeder: otherwise known as summer visitor. recorded in up to and including Dec 1999. Resident: implies breeding unless stated otherwise. were Cambridgeshire 3lst 'Feral: species breeding in the wild which were introduced, deliberately or (p.34 accidentally, by man. APPEI\DICES I-[I to 36) Appendix I: contains Category A and C species excluded from the Systematic List as they are ABBREVIATIONS probably escapes or releases from captivity. N/A indicates that record totals are not available e.g. when escapees cannot easily be distinguished Appendix II: contains Category D species fuotential CategoryA species). from wild individuals. Appendix III: contains only selected Category E species (potential Category C species). * denotes records not submitted to British Birds (aterBBRQ but accepted bythe local comnrittcc. ** denotes records rejected by British Birds (Iater BBRq but subsequently accepted by thc local committee where fresh evidence has become available. SF: sewage farm BF: sugar beet factory BP: brick pit GP: gravel pit BBRC: British Birds Rarities Committee. BOII British Omithologists' Union EarliesVlatest dates are given as (e.9.) 21.9.97; all refer to 20th century unless stated otherwise. SYSTEMATIC LIST Sooty Shearwater Puffinus griseus l(l) Very rare visitor: one at Grafrram Water on 3fth Oct 1988. An exceptional inland record of a Red-throated Diver Gavia stellata c.96(110) highly pelagic species, which breeds in the southern hemisphere. Scarce, almost annual passage migranVwinter visitor. Largest party 3 (Ferry Meadows Feb 1979 and Grafham WaterApr 1989). Earliest2l.9.97 and latest 23.4.89. Manx Shearwater Pufiinus puffinus c.28Q8) Rare visitor, the majority stranded during the dispersal of juveniles in Sept (many dead or Black-throated Diver Gavia arctica c.33(38) dying). Also noted Mar-May, July andAug. Scarce, almost annual passage migranVwinter visitor, chiefly to Graflram Water and other large expanses of water in the west of the county. Largest party 3 (Ferry Meadows Feb 1979). Storm Petrel (European Storm-petrel) Hydrobates pelagicus 8(8) Earliest 7.10.81 and latest 22.4.90. Very rare storm-driven visitor, with dated records in Jan, July, Nov and Dec. First noted in spring I 828 (Cambridge). Only 3 records in the 20th century (Reach Dec 1929, Steeple Morden Great Northern Diver Gavia immer c.46(48) Nov 1957 and Elsworth July 1979). Scarce, almost annual winter visitor. Summered once (Fen Drayton GP 1995), otherwise earliest 19.10.67 and latest 7.5.90.. Generally singly, but long-stayers were joined by second birds on Leach's Petrel (Leach's Storm-petrel) Oceanodroma leucorhoa 18(19) three occasions (Graftam Water Jan-Apr l97l and 1990, and Marsh [,ane GP Jan 1995). Rare visitor, the majority storm-driven, with at least 5 records during the spectaculaf,'wreck'of Oct/Nov 1952. AII dated records are within the period Sept-Dec. Two together at Graftram Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis Water in Sept 1983. Fairly common resident (cunently 100-150 pairs), breeding chiefly on lakes or ponds. The Gannet (Northern Gannet) Morus bassanus c.55(74) breeding population increased in I 940s-70s as new flooded gravel pits became available. Highest count 58 (Fen Drayton GPAug 1989). Scarce, almost annual visitor, the majority storm-driven during Sept-Nov (others noted Jan- May and July). Largest party 4 (Cambidge Apr 1981). Great Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus Cormorant (Great Cormorant) Phalacrocorax carbo Fairly common resident (cunently c.250 pairs); some immigration in cold winters.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cambridge Nature Network Final Report
    Cambridge Nature Network Final Report FOREWORD I’m delighted to introduce this important report. For years, now, we have known we need to ensure nature’s recovery, and for years that has been an all-too-elusive ambition. In fact, we are still overseeing nature’s decline. It’s a ship that simply must be turned around. Now we have a clear way forward. This report, building on the ambition to double nature in Cambridgeshire, tells us precisely how and where we can do it. Working from the ground up, looking at real places and the actual state of nature, it offers for the first time a tangible plan for the revitalisation of nature in the 10km around the city of Cambridge, based on what is already there and how it can be brought back to life. And there’s more. Fully integrated with the vision for nature recovery is one for the enhancement and creation of green spaces for public recreation and refreshment – vital needs, as we have come to understand fully during the covid-19 crisis. The risk with nature recovery is that in our enthusiasm we may do the wrong thing in the wrong place: plant trees on peat or valuable grassland, or put hedgerows in where the landscape should be open. This report will ensure we do the right thing in the right place. It provides a place-based analysis of where existing nature sites can be enhanced, what kind of nature-friendly farming to encourage, how to create stepping-stones to create new, linked nature networks, and how, overall, the ambition for doubling nature can be met.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Character Assessment
    OUSE WASHES Landscape Character Assessment Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES CONTENTS 04 Introduction Annexes 05 Context Landscape character areas mapping at 06 Study area 1:25,000 08 Structure of the report Note: this is provided as a separate document 09 ‘Fen islands’ and roddons Evolution of the landscape adjacent to the Ouse Washes 010 Physical influences 020 Human influences 033 Biodiversity 035 Landscape change 040 Guidance for managing landscape change 047 Landscape character The pattern of arable fields, 048 Overview of landscape character types shelterbelts and dykes has a and landscape character areas striking geometry 052 Landscape character areas 053 i Denver 059 ii Nordelph to 10 Mile Bank 067 iii Old Croft River 076 iv. Pymoor 082 v Manea to Langwood Fen 089 vi Fen Isles 098 vii Meadland to Lower Delphs Reeds, wet meadows and wetlands at the Welney 105 viii Ouse Valley Wetlands Wildlife Trust Reserve 116 ix Ouse Washes 03 THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Context Sets the scene Objectives Purpose of the study Study area Rationale for the Landscape Partnership area boundary A unique archaeological landscape Structure of the report Kite aerial photography by Bill Blake Heritage Documentation THE OUSE WASHES INTRODUCTION Introduction Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Context Ouse Washes LP boundary Wisbech County boundary This landscape character assessment (LCA) was District boundary A Road commissioned in 2013 by Cambridgeshire ACRE Downham as part of the suite of documents required for B Road Market a Landscape Partnership (LP) Heritage Lottery Railway Nordelph Fund bid entitled ‘Ouse Washes: The Heart of River Denver the Fens.’ However, it is intended to be a stand- Water bodies alone report which describes the distinctive March Hilgay character of this part of the Fen Basin that Lincolnshire Whittlesea contains the Ouse Washes and supports the South Holland District Welney positive management of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVING and WORKING in the AREA CONTENTS Introduction
    LIVING AND WORKING IN THE AREA CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................. 3 The City of Cambridge ............................................. 4 Culture ...................................................................... 5 Shopping .................................................................. 6 Café Culture, Restaurants and Bars ......................... 7 Huntingdon .............................................................. 8 Residential Areas ..................................................... 10 Housing ................................................................... 12 Travel ....................................................................... 13 Settling your family into the area ........................... 14 Maps ........................................................................ 16 If you are considering relocating to the area to join CRC at either campus (or both) then you might find this brochure, which gives a snapshot into life nearby as well as some insight into housing and travel, a helpful reference. 3 THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Cambridge, situated in the East of England, is a beautiful, historic city best known for its academics, university colleges and the River Cam. Cambridge is a popular visitor destination attracting people from across the world. The population of Cambridge sits at approximately 125,000 with almost a fifth made up of students and a significantly high proportion of adult professionals with a higher education qualification, making it a great
    [Show full text]
  • Fulbourn Site Assessment Proforma
    South Cambridgeshire Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) Report August 2013 Appendix 7i: Assessment of 2011 'Call for Sites' SHLAA sites Index of Fulbourn Site Assessment Proforma Site Site Address Site Capacity Page Number Land at Fulbourn Old Drift (south of Site 037 Cambridge Road and north of Shelford 921 dwellings 766 Road), Fulbourn Site 038 Land north of Cambridge Road, Fulbourn 166 dwellings 775 Site 074 Land off Station Road, Fulbourn 186 dwellings 783 Site 108 Land south of Hinton Road, Fulbourn 52 dwellings 794 Land to the South of Fulbourn Old Drift & Site 109 78 dwellings 802 Hinton Road, Fulbourn Site 136 Land at Balsham Road, Fulbourn 62 dwellings 810 Land between Teversham Road and Cow Site 162 92 dwellings 818 Lane, Fulbourn Land at east of Court Meadows House, Site 213 166 dwellings 829 Balsham Road, Fulbourn Site 214 Land off Home End, Fulbourn 14 dwellings 837 Site 245 Bird Farm Field, Cambridge Road, Fulbourn 85 dwellings 845 SHLAA (August 2013) Appendix 7i – Assessment of 2011 ‘Call for Sites’ SHLAA sites Minor Rural Centre Fulbourn Page 765 South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) Site Assessment Proforma Proforma July 2012 Created Proforma Last July 2013 Updated Location Fulbourn Site name / Land at Fulbourn Old Drift (south of Cambridge Road and north of address Shelford Road), Fulbourn Category of A village extension i.e. a development adjoining the existing village site: development framework boundary Description of promoter’s 3,050 dwellings with public open space proposal Site area 76.78 ha. (hectares) Site Number 037 The site lies to the south of Cambridge Road and north of Shelford Road on the south western edge of Fulbourn.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church Bells of Huntingdonshire
    The Church Bells of Huntingdonshire BY Rev. T. N. M. Owen File 03 : Part III Pages 59 to 149 This document is provided for you by The Whiting Society of Ringers visit www.whitingsociety.org.uk for the full range of publications and articles about bells and change ringing Purchased from ebay store retromedia B3;:Ei;si III. Purchased from ebay store retromedia Table of Approximate Weights. ft. ins. Purchased from ebay store retromedia INSCRIPTIONS. N.B.—The diameters of the bells being here stated, their approximate weight may be gathered by a reference to the table on the opposite page. And the inscriptions are given exactly as they occur on the bells ; mistakes therefore in spelling and the like are chargeable to the founder, not the printer. The Edwardian docu- ments at the Record Office are cited after letters " T. R. E.," which indicate Tempore Regis Edvardi, (the VI 'h.) I. ABBOTSLEIGH. S. Margaret. 5 bells. I. J: EAYEE. ST. NEOTS. 1748 GRATA SIT ARGUTA RESONANS CAMPNULA UOCE. (27I ins.) ins) - ^^^m% grpnp fprif anno bm 1S7S (^91 3. (fig. 9) D Cii ^iim Campana jiiargarete Jl^onu'nata {This bell much worn by the clapper and i/i need of quarter-turning.) (32 ins.) 4. MILES ^ GRAVE ^ MADE ^ ME ^ 1653 (34^ ins.) 5. B : WOOD CHURCHWARDEN 1748 NON SONO ANIMABUS MORTUORUM SED AURIBUS VIUENTIM. {zH ins.) {See p. 9 for description of treble^ The Pancake Bell (second) on Shrove Tuesday was usual thirty years ago, at noon. Gleaning Bell (first) is rung during harvest at 7 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Peterborough Flood Risk Management Strategy (FMS)
    0 Peterborough Flood Risk Management Strategy (FMS) 27 1 28 Peterborough Flood Risk Management Strategy Flood Risk Management Strategy Production This document has been prepared by Peterborough City Council (the Lead Local Flood Authority) with input from the Environment Agency, Anglian Water, North Level District Internal Drainage Board, Middle Level Commissioners, Welland and Deeping Internal Drainage Board, Highway England and the Local Resilience Forum. This document has been prepared by collecting information over the last four years about flood risk in Peterborough and about the needs to build resilience against flooding. The following table sets out some of the major events that have contributed to the development of this strategy and the remaining stages required for finalisation and adoption. Stage Event Date Continuous involvement of Flood and 2010 - 2014 Water Management Partnership City Centre Flood Awareness Fair September 2011 Letters sent to all parish councils to invite September 2011 them to nominate flood wardens Issued community newsletter Spring 2012 Development of Flood and Water website April 2012 for residents and developers Evidence gathering - Thorpe Gate Residents meeting April 2012 significant community engagement Flood Awareness Fair – West Ward February 2013 Preparation of Flood and Water December 2012 – Management Supplementary Planning December 2013 Document Presentation to Scrutiny Commission for March 2013 Rural Communities Cambridgeshire Community Resilience April 2013 Event Peterborough Community Resilience
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary
    East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document June 2010 © THE WILDLIFE TRUST FOR BEDFORDSHIRE, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE & PETERBOROUGH LTD and EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL All rights reserved. No part of the text of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any type of retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owners All mapping is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Cambridgeshire County Council 100023205 (2005). EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNTY WILDLIFE STIES REGISTER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODOLOGY 2 2.1 Field Survey 2 2.2 Assessment of Sites 3 2.3 Output Format 3 3 RESULTS 4 3.1 Statistics 4 COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES REGISTER ANNEXE Criteria for the Selection of County Wildlife Sites Version 5 (2009). CONTENTS PAGE EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES SPD 1 Introduction 1.1 The East Cambridgeshire District Council (ECDC) County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document has been produced to update the East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Register 2005 so that it can be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the East Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework (LDF). 1.2 On the 20th October 2009 East Cambridgeshire District Council adopted its Core Strategy Development Plan Document as part of its LDF. The adoption of the Core Strategy means that most of the policies in the East Cambridgeshire District Local Plan 2000 have been superceded.
    [Show full text]
  • WALK 9 DULLINGHAM to FULBOURN
    ROUTE FINDING WALK Key to landscape features You will need a basic understanding of maps and the ability to follow them. The walks can be followed in either direction, but if you go in the same way as the arrows, you won’t have Marpa to turn the map around to fit the landscape. STATION TO STATION WALKS 9 TIME DULLINGHAM to FULBOURN Allow about 6-7 hours, but add on time for refreshments, visit- 12½ miles - 6-7 hours ing nature reserves and churches. MAPS OS Explorer sheets 210 Newmarket and Haverhill and 209 Cambridge. REFRESHMENTS Pubs in Dullingham, Burrough Green, Brinkley (just off route) and Fulbourn, where there are also shops. USEFUL INFORMATION National Rail Enquiries www.nationalrail.co.uk 08457 48 49 50 Traveline www.traveline.info 0871 200 22 33 Fulbourn Fen www.wildlifebcnp.org/reserves/ WALKS IN THIS SERIES 1 Ipswich to Needham Market 2 Needham Market to Stowmarket MUTLOW HILL TUMULUS 3 Stowmarket to Elmswell 4 Elmswell to Thurston Closure of intermediate stations at Six Mile Bottom 5 Thurston to Bury St Edmunds and Fulbourn has left a long trek for walkers heading 6 Kennett to Bury St Edmunds for Cambridge, but use can be made of bus Citi 1 7 Kennett to Newmarket (every 20 mins Mon-Sat.) to break the walk at Ful- 8 Newmarket to Dullingham bourn. 9 Dullingham to Fulbourn Much of this walk follows part of the Icknield Way 10 Fulbourn to Cambridge 11 Newmarket to Soham Path, a recreational long distance route linking the PLEASE FOLLOW THE 12 Soham to Ely Ridgeway national trail at Ivinghoe Beacon with the COUNTRYSIDE CODE: 13 Dullingham to Kennett Peddars Way national trail through Norfolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Northampton in Focus: a Review of Environmental, Economic and Social Data
    Northampton in Focus: A Review of Environmental, Economic and Social Data Prepared for: Northampton Borough Council Prepared by: ENVIRON Exeter, UK Date: July 2010 Project Number: UK1814571 Northampton in Focus: A Review of Environmental, Northampton Borough Council Economic and Social Data Contract/Proposal No: UK1814571 Issue: 4 Author Vicky Pearson, Catherine Banks (signature): Project Manager/Director Johanna Curran (signature): Date: 2nd July 2010 This report has been prepared by ENVIRON with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the Services and the Terms agreed between ENVIRON and the Client. This report is confidential to the client, and ENVIRON accepts no responsibility whatsoever to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known, unless formally agreed by ENVIRON beforehand. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. ENVIRON disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the agreed scope of the Services. Version Control Record Issue Description of Status Date Reviewer Authors Initials Initials 1 First draft Final 25/09/09 JC VP 2 Second draft Final 10/11/09 RA VP 3 Third draft Final with updates 10/05/10 JC VP 4 final 02/07/10 JC CB/VP UK18-14571 Issue 4 Northampton in Focus: A Review of Environmental, Northampton Borough Council Economic and Social Data Contents Page Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 1 2 Overview of Northampton and Priority Issues 5 3 Discussion of the Northampton Central Area and Priority Issues Identified 17 4 Future Updates 25 Annex A: Topic Papers Annex B: Glossary UK18-14571 Issue 4 Northampton in Focus: A Review of Environmental, Northampton Borough Council Economic and Social Data Executive Summary Northampton Borough Council is currently producing various strategies to plan for the future of Northampton.
    [Show full text]
  • A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 8.1: Air Quality
    A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 8.1: Air quality data Date: December 2014 6.3 Page left intentionally blank. A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Environmental Statement Appendices 1 Planning policy 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) flowchart 1 1.3 Local planning policies relevant to air quality 2 2 Operational assessment methodology 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Receptors 7 3 Meteorological data 9 4 Baseline data 15 4.1 Introduction 15 4.2 Continuous monitoring data 15 4.3 Diffusion tube monitoring data 17 4.4 Sites used for verification 27 4.5 J2A scheme specific monitoring 51 5 Diffusion tube bias adjustment factors and annualisation 54 5.1 Introduction 54 5.2 Factor from local co-location studies 54 5.3 Discussion of choice of factor to use 56 5.4 Short-term to long-term data adjustment 56 6 Background pollution concentrations 60 7 Operational phase impacts 62 7.1 Introduction 62 7.2 Model verification 62 7.3 Modelled concentrations 69 8 Compliance with EU limit values 126 9 Bibliography 127 f 6.3 December 2014 i A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement Environmental Statement Appendices scheme 1 Planning policy 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 This section provides the National Planning Practice Guidance NPPG flowchart (Box 1) and details of local planning policies which are used to inform significance as described in Chapter 8. 1.2 National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) flowchart Box 1: NPPG flow chart 6.3 December 2014 1 A14 Cambridge to
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    local environment agency plan BEDFORD OUSE (Lower Reaches) LEAP FIRST ANNUAL REVIEW MAY 2001 Bedford Ouse (Lower Reaches) LEAP Environment First Annual Review Agency Map 1 __________________ Regions Anglian Region Bedford Ouse (Lower Reaches)' Local Environment Agency Plan i Central A rea Bedford Ouse Area Location NOTE: BEDFORD OUSE (Lower Reaches) LEAP - FIRST ANNUAL REVIEW Following the General Election in June- 2001, some of the responsibilities of the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) and those of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) were transferred to the newly created Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). References in this report to DETR and MAFF should therefore be taken to mean DEFRA. Examples of recreational enhancements in the Bedford Ouse (Lower Reaches) LEAP Area Three new fishing platforms on the Bedford Ouse at Wyboston Leisure Park allow disabled anglers to fish safely from the bank MP» Agency-owned fish rearing ponds on the Ouse Valley Way at Brampton have been converted into a new conservation and amenity area for passing walkers 0 E n v i r o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House. Goldhay Way, Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 0 6 1 3 3 4 V IS IO N (Taken from the LEAP) Most societies want to achieve economic development to secure a better quality of life, now and in the future, while still protecting the environment. The concept of sustainable development tries to reconcile these two objectives - meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
    [Show full text]