DOCSLIB.ORG

Cambridge Nature Network Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cambridge Nature Network Final Report Cambridge Nature Network Final Report FOREWORD I’m delighted to introduce this important report. For years, now, we have known we need to ensure nature’s recovery, and for years that has been an all-too-elusive ambition. In fact, we are still overseeing nature’s decline. It’s a ship that simply must be turned around. Now we have a clear way forward. This report, building on the ambition to double nature in Cambridgeshire, tells us precisely how and where we can do it. Working from the ground up, looking at real places and the actual state of nature, it offers for the first time a tangible plan for the revitalisation of nature in the 10km around the city of Cambridge, based on what is already there and how it can be brought back to life. And there’s more. Fully integrated with the vision for nature recovery is one for the enhancement and creation of green spaces for public recreation and refreshment – vital needs, as we have come to understand fully during the covid-19 crisis. The risk with nature recovery is that in our enthusiasm we may do the wrong thing in the wrong place: plant trees on peat or valuable grassland, or put hedgerows in where the landscape should be open. This report will ensure we do the right thing in the right place. It provides a place-based analysis of where existing nature sites can be enhanced, what kind of nature-friendly farming to encourage, how to create stepping-stones to create new, linked nature networks, and how, overall, the ambition for doubling nature can be met. Of course in our hearts we know that in a nature-depleted county like Cambridgeshire we will need to do more. But this approach is a foundational one; once started it will galvanise efforts to do even better. And above all it will guide funding from whatever source is available: including the new ELMS support scheme for farmers; new planning measures to achieve Biodiversity Net Gain; sponsorship or corporate donations; and the activity of the many nature-focused organisations in the area so that we achieve the right ends in the right places. This is a landmark report, and I congratulate those whose vision and support have made it possible, especially the Gatsby Charitable Foundation, who funded the report and the underlying work, and James Littlewood of Cambridge Past Present and Future, Martin Baker of the Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire, and Matthew Bullock of Cambridge Ahead and his colleagues on its Youth Advisory Committee, who worked to bring this report to fruition. I also thank our small advisory group: Sir Nicholas Bacon, John Torlesse, Kim Wilkie and Robert Myers whose wisdom has shaped the final report. Please read, absorb and act on what is in this report. It is, simply, crucial to our very survival. And if it can be done in Cambridgeshire it can be done anywhere. Above all, it is work that must be done if we are to get our relationship with nature onto a sustainable footing. Dame Fiona Reynolds Master, Emmanuel College Former Director-General, National Trust Cambridge Nature Network Final Report ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work to identify and progress a Cambridge Nature Network has been carried out largely by Cambridge Past, Present & Future and the Wildlife Trust BCN. It has been funded through a grant from the Gatsby Foundation to whom we are very grateful. We need to thank Matthew Bullock and Cambridge Ahead’s Young Advisory Group who led on the research to understand how a nature network could be sustained and who also provided secretarial support to the project team. Their work relied upon the co-operation of other organisations and so we are also grateful to the National Trust, RSPB, Magog Trust, Cambridge Sports Lake Trust, Cambridge University Botanic Garden and Cambridge City Council. In the course of carrying out this work we have been granted permission to carry out surveys on private land and we have held discussions with individual landowners. They are too numerous to mention individually but we would like to thank them for their co-operation. Finally, we also wish to thank the small advisory group that has helped to inform the project, chaired by Dame Fiona Reynolds and including John Torlesse, Kim Wilkie, Robert Myers and Sir Nicholas Bacon. Cambridge Nature Network Final Report CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Strategic Land Use Planning ................................................................................... 7 1.3 Study Aims & Objectives ......................................................................................... 7 2. STUDY STAGES ........................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Stage 1: Identification of Priority Areas ................................................................... 9 2.2 Stage 2A: Identifying the Components of a Nature Network .................................... 9 2.3 Stage 2B: Identification of Public Access Green Infrastructure .............................. 12 2.4 Stage 2C: Identification of Financial and Organisational Sustainability Models ..... 12 2.5 Stage 3: Stakeholder Engagement & Identification of Detailed Proposals ............. 12 2.6 Out of Scope ......................................................................................................... 13 3. IDENTIFICATION OF PRIORITY AREAS .................................................................... 15 3.1 Sites of Highest Biodiversity Value ........................................................................ 15 3.2 Identification of Priority Areas ............................................................................... 15 3.3 Gog Magog Hills ................................................................................................... 16 3.4 Cambridge Fens ................................................................................................... 16 3.5 Wicken Fen (South) .............................................................................................. 16 3.6 River Cam Corridor ............................................................................................... 16 3.7 Boulder Clay Woodlands....................................................................................... 17 3.8 Fen-edge Orchards and Droves ............................................................................ 17 4. STRATEGIC NATURAL GREENSPACE ASSESSMENT ............................................ 20 4.1 Accessible Natural Greenspace Analysis .............................................................. 20 4.2 Summary of Strategic Accessible Natural Greenspace ......................................... 26 5. PRIORITY AREA NATURE NETWORK COMPONENTS ............................................ 29 5.1 Nature Network Rules of Thumb ........................................................................... 29 5.2 Gog Magog Hills ................................................................................................... 31 5.2.1 Key Facts ....................................................................................................... 31 5.2.2 Network Approach: ........................................................................................ 31 5.2.3 Objectives: ..................................................................................................... 37 5.2.4 Strategic Green Infrastructure Network .......................................................... 37 5.2.5 Gog Magog Hills Vision: ................................................................................. 39 5.3 Cambridge Fens ................................................................................................... 41 5.3.1 Key Facts ....................................................................................................... 41 5.3.2 Network Approach: ........................................................................................ 41 5.3.3 Objectives: ..................................................................................................... 46 5.3.4 Strategic Green Infrastructure Network .......................................................... 46 5.3.5 Cambridge Fens Vision .................................................................................. 48 5.4 Wicken Fen (South) .............................................................................................. 50 Cambridge Nature Network Final Report 5.4.1 Key Facts ....................................................................................................... 50 5.4.2 Network Approach: ........................................................................................ 50 5.4.3 Objectives: ..................................................................................................... 55 5.4.4 Strategic Green Infrastructure Network .......................................................... 55 5.4.5 Wicken Fen (South) Vision: ............................................................................ 58 5.5 River Cam Corridor ............................................................................................... 60 5.5.1 Key Facts ....................................................................................................... 60 5.5.2 Network Approach: .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fen Causeway
    Fen Causeway An important vehicular route which crosses the attractive rural spaces of Coe Fen and Sheep’s Green with views back towards the city. Fen Causeway was built in as one of the main routes the 1920s to link Newnham around Cambridge, but the village with Trumpington negative effect of this traffic Road and to provide access is mitigated by the pastural to the south of the city. Its setting and the views of the construction was the subject River Cam with the historic of fierce local opposition city centre beyond. at the time. The road was built on the line of Coe Fen Lane, which joined the footpaths that crossed Coe Fen and Sheep’s Green. Today the road is very busy Fen Causeway SIGNIFICANCE - SIGNIFICANT General Overview At its eastern end Fen Causeway passes between the large properties of the Leys School to the south and the Royal Cambridge Hotel and University Department of Engineering to the north. Although the hotel is built up against the pavement, the car parks to the rear provide a large open space, whilst the school and engineering department stand back from the road behind high walls. The setback makes the street a light space, although the high buildings to either side channel views along the street in both directions. The grounds on either side provide greenery that softens the streetscene. The Royal Cambridge Hotel North House of the Leys School provides architectural interest as part of the late Victorian Methodist School complex, built in red brick with exuberant stone and brick detailing which provides a strong vertical emphasis.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Technical Report
    Making Meaningful Connections Consultation Technical Report East West Rail Consultation: 31 March – 9 June 2021 This document contains the full Consultation Technical Report, without the Appendices. To access the Appendices, please visit www.eastwestrail.co.uk 01. Introduction 18 - 26 07. Project Section B: Bletchley and the Marston Vale Line 100 - 229 1.1. Chapter Summary 18 7.1. Chapter Summary 101 1.2. East West Rail 19 7.2. Introduction 104 1.3. The Project 19 7.3. Service Concepts 109 1.4. Consultation 23 7.4. Bletchley Station 141 1.5. Technical Report 26 7.5. Fenny Stratford Additional Track 144 02. The Case for East West Rail 27 - 31 7.6. Level Crossings on the Marston Vale Line 146 2.1. Chapter Summary 27 7.7. Marston Vale Line Infrastructure Upgrade 228 2.2. The overall case for East West Rail 28 08. Project Section C: Bedford 230 - 299 2.3. Benefits of railways over road improvements 31 8.1. Chapter Summary 230 03. Project Objectives 32 - 42 8.2. Introduction 234 3.1. Chapter Summary 32 8.3. Bedford St Johns 238 3.2. Introduction 33 8.4. Bedford Station 250 3.3. Safety 34 8.5. North Bedford 268 3.4. Environment 34 8.6. Conclusion 297 3.5. EWR Services 34 09. Project Section D: Clapham Green to The Eversdens 300 - 371 3.6. Connectivity 36 9.1. Chapter Summary 301 3.7. Customer Experience and Stations 37 9.2. Introduction 303 3.8. Powering EWR Services 38 9.3. Option Development 306 3.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycologist News
    MYCOLOGIST NEWS The newsletter of the British Mycological Society 2012 (4) Edited by Prof. Pieter van West and Dr Anpu Varghese 2013 BMS Council BMS Council and Committee Members 2013 President Prof. Geoffrey D. Robson Vice-President Prof. Bruce Ing President Elect Prof Nick Read Treasurer Prof. Geoff M Gadd Secretary Position vacant Publications Officer Dr. Pieter van West International Initiatives Adviser Prof. AJ Whalley Fungal Biology Research Committee representatives: Dr. Elaine Bignell; Prof Nick Read Fungal Education and Outreach Committee: Dr. Paul S. Dyer; Dr Ali Ashby Field Mycology and Conservation: Dr. Stuart Skeates, Mrs Dinah Griffin Fungal Biology Research Committee Prof. Nick Read (Chair) retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Elaine Bignell retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Mark Ramsdale retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Pieter van West retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Sue Crosthwaite retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof. Mick Tuite retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr Alex Brand retiring 31.12. 2015 Fungal Education and Outreach Committee Dr. Paul S. Dyer (Chair and FBR link) retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Ali Ashby retiring 31.12. 2013 Ms. Carol Hobart (FMC link) retiring 31.12. 2012 Dr. Sue Assinder retiring 31.12. 2013 Dr. Kay Yeoman retiring 31.12. 2013 Alan Williams retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof Lynne Boddy (Media Liaison) retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr. Elaine Bignell retiring 31.12. 2015 Field Mycology and Conservation Committee Dr. Stuart Skeates (Chair, website & FBR link) retiring 31.12. 2014 Prof Richard Fortey retiring 31.12. 2013 Mrs. Sheila Spence retiring 31.12. 2013 Mrs Dinah Griffin retiring 31.12. 2014 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cam from Grantchester to Cambridge a Much Loved River in Need of Our Care
    The Cam from Grantchester to Cambridge A much loved river in need of our care. Grantchester Meadows- Autumn 2019.. Michael Goodhart April 2021 Page 1 of 25 Introduction This document was prompted by the dismay over the damage caused by the crowds who sought refuge and recreation along the banks of the river Cam and in the river during the Pandemic of 2020- 2021. While most respected the river and its ecology, sadly, there were a small but significant minority who indulged in reckless, antisocial and damaging behaviour, showing little or no regard for this precious and beautiful stretch of water. This document explains the context and importance of the river. It illustrates the entire 2.8 miles length of the “upper river”, from Byrons Pool to Kings Mill Weir in Cambridge, and may provide a better understanding of the river’s rich history and precious ecology. It is hoped that it may motivate more people to want to protect it from damage, now and in the future. This is the first of the documents that has been prepared as part of Cam Valley Forum’s “Cam Safer Swim Initiative” (CSSI) If you wish to comment on this, please email [email protected]. You can see more information on Cam Valley Forum on our website here. https://camvalleyforum.uk/ Do join us. Michael Goodhart- Chair of Cam Safer Swim Initiative (CSSI) Cam Valley Forum 19th April 2012 Page 2 of 25 The Cam from Grantchester to Cambridge A much loved river in need of our care. 1. The sources of the River Cam include Chalk springs, such as those at Ashwell, Bassingbourne, Fowlmere, Melbourn, Hauxton, Thriplow and Horseheath.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Ecological Changes in the British Flora WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN How to cite: WALKER, KEVIN,JOHN (2009) Ecological Changes in the British Flora, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/121/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Ecological Changes in the British Flora Kevin John Walker B.Sc., M.Sc. School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences University of Durham 2009 This thesis is submitted in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dedicated to Terry C. E. Wells (1935-2008) With thanks for the help and encouragement so generously given over the last ten years Plate 1 Pulsatilla vulgaris , Barnack Hills and Holes, Northamptonshire Photo: K.J. Walker Contents ii Contents List of tables vi List of figures viii List of plates x Declaration xi Abstract xii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary
    East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document June 2010 © THE WILDLIFE TRUST FOR BEDFORDSHIRE, CAMBRIDGESHIRE, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE & PETERBOROUGH LTD and EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL All rights reserved. No part of the text of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any type of retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owners All mapping is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Cambridgeshire County Council 100023205 (2005). EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNTY WILDLIFE STIES REGISTER CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 METHODOLOGY 2 2.1 Field Survey 2 2.2 Assessment of Sites 3 2.3 Output Format 3 3 RESULTS 4 3.1 Statistics 4 COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES REGISTER ANNEXE Criteria for the Selection of County Wildlife Sites Version 5 (2009). CONTENTS PAGE EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES SPD 1 Introduction 1.1 The East Cambridgeshire District Council (ECDC) County Wildlife Sites Supplementary Planning Document has been produced to update the East Cambridgeshire District County Wildlife Sites Register 2005 so that it can be adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the East Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework (LDF). 1.2 On the 20th October 2009 East Cambridgeshire District Council adopted its Core Strategy Development Plan Document as part of its LDF. The adoption of the Core Strategy means that most of the policies in the East Cambridgeshire District Local Plan 2000 have been superceded.
    [Show full text]
  • Hodson's Folly: 'Swimmers Temple'
    Temples, Gardens and Characters Things soon went awry as Hodson’s fortunes collapsed according to his niece The provenance of the picture (shown) of the brewer Col. Dale (Owner of Hodson’s Folly: ‘Swimmers Temple’ Mrs E Fordham following the Whittaker Wright railway scam in 1900, which was Dale’s Brewery, Gwydir Street off Mill Road), has been difficult to determine, odson’s Folly is not listed, but is known as a Building of Local Interest (BLI). The investments for building the Bakerloo Line in London. Following this in 1901 it is suggested the picture was taken in 1903, Col. Dale would have been Folly is a small classical building in a walled garden. Hodson’s Folly is thought Hodson sold his garden for £300, the Folly and possibly his house ‘Waterloo 4 or 5 years old as he died in 1969 aged 71. It has been established that to have been built circa 1897, by Rattee and Kett stonemasons, a Cambridge House’ on Lensfield Road to Frederick Dale the local brewery magnate (Dale’s following John Hodson’s ‘loss of fortune‘ the Dale’s did purchase the HBusiness which appears to have ceased existence in 2011 after around 167 years of brewery Gwydir Street off Mill Road), the Dale’s family used the garden from land, which backs up the picture as circa 1903, does this mean that the trading (1844). They built Cambridge University Library in the 1930s, completely rebuilt this time and it was accepted that no-one intruded. In 1907 he was living at child in the picture is Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy
    Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 of 176 June 2011 Contributors The Strategy has been shaped and informed by many partners including: The Green Infrastructure Forum Anglian Water Cambridge City Council Cambridge Past, Present and Future (formerly Cambridge Preservation Society) Cambridge Sports Lake Trust Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Partnership Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Environmental Record Centre Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council East of England Development Agency (EEDA) English Heritage The Environment Agency Fenland District Council Forestry Commission Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group GO-East Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England NHS Cambridgeshire Peterborough Environment City Trust Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) South Cambridgeshire District Council The National Trust The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire & Peterborough The Woodland Trust Project Group To manage the review and report to the Green Infrastructure Forum. Cambridge City Council Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council Environment Agency Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England South Cambridgeshire District Council The Wildlife Trust Consultants: LDA Design Page 2 of 176 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................11 2 Background
    [Show full text]
  • A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 8.1: Air Quality
    A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Environmental Statement Appendices Appendix 8.1: Air quality data Date: December 2014 6.3 Page left intentionally blank. A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement scheme Environmental Statement Appendices 1 Planning policy 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) flowchart 1 1.3 Local planning policies relevant to air quality 2 2 Operational assessment methodology 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Receptors 7 3 Meteorological data 9 4 Baseline data 15 4.1 Introduction 15 4.2 Continuous monitoring data 15 4.3 Diffusion tube monitoring data 17 4.4 Sites used for verification 27 4.5 J2A scheme specific monitoring 51 5 Diffusion tube bias adjustment factors and annualisation 54 5.1 Introduction 54 5.2 Factor from local co-location studies 54 5.3 Discussion of choice of factor to use 56 5.4 Short-term to long-term data adjustment 56 6 Background pollution concentrations 60 7 Operational phase impacts 62 7.1 Introduction 62 7.2 Model verification 62 7.3 Modelled concentrations 69 8 Compliance with EU limit values 126 9 Bibliography 127 f 6.3 December 2014 i A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon improvement Environmental Statement Appendices scheme 1 Planning policy 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 This section provides the National Planning Practice Guidance NPPG flowchart (Box 1) and details of local planning policies which are used to inform significance as described in Chapter 8. 1.2 National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) flowchart Box 1: NPPG flow chart 6.3 December 2014 1 A14 Cambridge to
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation
    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Glanville Road, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 9AU Guide Price
    2 Glanville Road, Trumpington, Cambridge, CB2 9AU Guide Price £415,000 Freehold rah.co.uk 01223 800860 A STUNNING AND BEAUTIFULLY PRESENTED TWO-BEDROOM SEMI-DETACHED PROPERTY OF EXCELLENT PROPORTIONS WITH OFF ROAD PARKING, A SOUTH-WESTERLY FACING GARDEN AND NO ONWARD CHAIN. Two bedrooms • living room • kitchen/dining room • wc • family bathroom• entrance hall • gas central heating • double glazing • driveway parking • front and rear gardens Well situated on the award-winning Abode development this spacious two-bedroom property offers excellent access to Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge city centre and commuter links via the train station or M11 and is being offered for sale with no onward chain. The well thought out living accommodation is arranged over two floors with, on the ground floor, a good-sized living room with full height windows to the front and door through to the kitchen/ dining room. The kitchen has been fitted with a range of modern contemporary units which house integrated appliances such as the fan assisted oven. There is a space for a dining table and a door opening out onto the fully enclosed rear garden. On the first floor are two good sized bedrooms and a family bathroom. Outside the property benefits from gated driveway parking and a south westerly facing rear garden. The garden is mostly laid to lawn, fully enclosed by fencing and remarkably private. Location Glanville Road is situated within the highly acclaimed Abode development, forming part of a unique suburb on the south side of the city known as Great Kneighton. Facilities will include a central community square with a variety of shops, library, doctors surgery, dentist practice, primary and secondary schooling, together with large open spaces including a RSPB nature reserve, allotments, footpaths, sports pitches, cycle paths and a BMX course.
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire & Fenland Water Cycle Study
    East Cambridgeshire & Fenland Water Cycle Study Outline Study – Main Planning Report April 2011 Prepared for East Cambridgeshire and Fenland Outline Water Cycle Study Revision Schedule East Cambridgeshire & Fenland Water Cycle Study – Main Planning Report Final April 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 June 2010 D129319 – Main Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Jon Robinson Planning Report Consultant Principal Consultant Technical Director DRAFT FOR COMMENT 02 July 2010 D129319 – Main Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Jon Robinson Planning Report Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Technical Director V2 03 Oct 2010 D129319 – Main Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Planning Report Senior Consultant Principal Consultant V3 04 Dec 2010 D129319 – Main Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Jon Robinson Planning Report Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Technical Director draft FINAL 05 April 2011 D129319 – Main Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Jon Robinson Planning Report Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Technical Director FINAL Scott Wilson Scott House Alencon Link This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed Basingstoke to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson Hampshire accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may RG21 7PP copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd.
    [Show full text]