CASE 4 Southwest Airlines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CASE 4 Southwest Airlines CASE 4 Southwest Airlines Flying High with Low Costs Southwest Airlines sent its first flights alo! in 1971. A!er almost 45 years, Southwest was so successful that the company was considered, in many ways, the crown jewel of the airline industry. The organization had achieved the longest continuous stretch of profitability in the history of the airline industry and was consistently ranked in the top 10 on Fortune’s list of “Most Admired Companies,” a list that spanned all industries. Southwest’s executives liked to say that they strove toward a triple bottom-line of People, Planet, and Performance. In 2015, Southwest was on strong financial ground, despite the fact that the prior 15 years had been some of the most difficult in aviation history. The airline industry had been hurt by the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the Great Recession of 2008–2009. Although 2009 had been a dif- ficult year for the company, Southwest had still managed to eke out a positive net income of $99 million. The company’s performance improved in the subsequent years, with net income rising above $400 million and revenues increasing from $10.3 billion in 2009 to more than $17 billion in 2012 (see Exhibits 1 through 3). Southwest achieved its strong financial performance in large part by having a high load factor, the airline industry’s measure of the percentage of seats that are filled on an airline’s flights. In 2010, Southwest hit the highest load factor in its history: 79.3 percent. Following its successful “Bags Fly Free” ad campaign, Southwest also saw its domestic market share increase by almost 2 percent. Southwest was known for high levels of both customer service and employee satisfaction. In 2013, Southwest not only rated as the top airline in a Consumer Reports survey of passengers1 but also reigned at the top of the US Department of Transportation’s customer satisfaction rankings. By 2015, with the benefit of lower fuel costs, it achieved record profits of $4.1 billion. Overall, Southwest had an enviable record of performance. The US Airline Industry The airline industry is critical to the health of the US economy. Airlines provide 11 million jobs in the United States and are responsible for five cents of every dollar of the US gross domestic product (GDP). For every 100 airline jobs that exist, 388 more jobs are supported outside of the airline industry.2 A key turning point in airline history was the deregulation of the industry in 1978. Before deregulation, the Civil Aeronautics Board regulated all passenger fares, which meant the price was the same for each flight between two cities. The board also regulated industry entrances and exits; mergers and acquisitions; and even airlines’ rates of return. Typically, any given market had only a few airlines, and price competition was essentially nonexistent. Following deregulation, numerous new entrants moved into both established and unserved markets, and fare prices began to drop quickly. The average passenger fare in 1978 was about 8.49 cents per mile. In 2009, that price, adjusted for inflation, had decreased C-41 case04SouthwestAirlines.indd 41 11/8/19 6:15 PM C-42 Southwest Airlines EXHIBIT 1 Southwest Airlines Selected Financial & Operating Figures Financial Data: 2015 2013 2011 (In Millions except per share) Total Operating Revenues: 19,820 17,699 15,658 Operating Expenses: Salaries, wages, and benefits 6,383 5,305 4,371 Fuel and oil 3,616 5,763 5,644 Maintenance materials and repairs 1,005 1,080 955 Aircra! rentals 238 361 308 Landing fees and other rentals 1,166 1,103 959 Depreciation and amortization 1,015 867 715 Other operating expenses 2,242 86 1,879 Total Operating Expenses: 15,704 16,421 14,965 Operating Income: 4,116 1,278 693 Net Income: 2,181 754 178 Net income per share, basic 3.30 1.06 0.23 Total assets at period-end 21,312 19,345 18,068 Long-term obligations at period-end 2,541 2,191 3,107 Stockholders’ equity at period-end 7,358 7,336 6,877 Operating Data: Revenue passengers carried 118,171,211 108,075,976 103,973,759 Enplaned passengers 144,574,882 133,155,030 127,551,012 Revenue passenger miles (RPMs) (000s) 117,499,879 104,348,216 97,582,530 Available seat miles (ASMs) (000s) 140,501,409 130,344,072 120,578,736 Load factor (1) 83.6% 80.1% 80.9% Average aircra! stage length (miles) 750 703 679 Trips flown 1,267,358 1,312,785 1,317,977 Average passenger fare 154.85 154.72 141.90 Passenger revenue yield per RPM 15.57¢ 16.02¢ 15.12¢ Operating revenue yield per ASM 13.98¢ 13.58¢ 12.99¢ Operating expenses per ASM 11.18¢ 12.60¢ 12.41¢ Fulltime equivalent Employees at period-end 49,583 44,831 45,392 Aircra! in service at period-end (2) 704 680 698 (1) Revenue passenger miles divided by available seat miles (2) Includes leased aircra! Source: Southwest Airlines Annual Reports. 56 percent.3 As prices declined for passengers, however, more than 150 airlines went bankrupt, and eight of the 11 major airlines went bankrupt, merged, or closed. The airline industry’s profit margins are some of the lowest in the world (see Exhibits 4 and 5). Airlines paid considerable attention to reducing their operating costs, but their con- trol over those costs was severely limited. In particular, labor costs represented the largest percentage of an airline’s costs, but union agreements limited labor flexibility. The sizes of the crew and ground sta# were typically proportional to the size of the aircra! they served. Other case04SouthwestAirlines.indd 42 11/8/19 6:15 PM The US Airline Industry C-43 EXHIBIT 2 Southwest Airlines Balance Sheet As of December 31 . 2015 2013 2011 2009 Current Assets: (In Millions) Cash and cash equivalents 1,583 1,355 829 1,114 Short-term investments 1,468 1,797 2,315 1,479 Accounts and other receivables 474 419 299 169 Inventories of parts and supplies, at cost 311 467 401 221 Deferred income taxes 2,490 168 263 291 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 188 250 238 84 Total current assets 4,024 4,456 4,345 3,358 Property and equipment, at cost: Flight equipment 19,462 16,937 15,542 13,719 Ground property and equipment 3,219 2,666 2,423 1,922 Deposits on flight equipment purchase contracts 1,089 764 456 247 24,685 20,820 18,421 15,888 Less allowance for depreciation and amortization 9,084 7,431 6,294 5,254 15,601 13,389 12,127 10,634 Other assets 717 530 626 277 21,312 19,345 18,068 14,269 Current Liabilities: Accounts payable 1,188 1,247 1,057 732 Accrued liabilities 2,591 1,229 996 729 Air tra#ic liability 2,990 2,571 1,836 1,044 Current maturities of long-term debt 637 629 644 190 Total current liabilities 7,406 5,676 4,533 2,695 Long-term debt less current maturities 2,541 2,191 3,107 3,325 Deferred income taxes 2,490 2,934 2,566 2,200 Deferred gains from sale and leaseback of aircra! 43 65 75 102 Other noncurrent liabilities 760 771 910 493 Stockholders’ Equity: Common stock, $1.00 par value 808 808 808 808 Capital in excess of par value 1,374 1,231 1,222 1,216 Retained earnings 9,409 6,431 5,395 4,971 Accumulated other comprehensive income –1,051 –3 –224 –578 Treasury stock, at cost: –3,182 –1,131 –324 –963 Total stockholders’ equity 7,358 7,336 6,877 5,454 Source: Southwest Airlines Annual Reports. operating costs were primarily determined by the distance traveled and not by the number of passengers boarded. Most airlines—notably Delta, American, and United—used a hub-and-spoke system to coordinate flights, which meant that they funneled the majority of their tra#ic through “hub” airports. Hub-and-spoke (HS) systems were designed to help airlines maximize their load factors, meaning they helped keep planes full going into and out of a hub airport. case04SouthwestAirlines.indd 43 11/8/19 6:15 PM C-44 Southwest Airlines EXHIBIT 3 US Domestic Airline Total Operating Revenues (In millions) American America Continental Delta Northwest Southwest United US JetBlue Alaska West Airways 2015 33,581 — — 40,816 — 19,820 37,864 7,504 6,416 5,594 2013 25,760 — — 37,818 — 17,699 38,287 14,936 5,442 5,151 2012 24,825 — — 36,917 — 16,411 37,160 14,121 4,982 4,650 2011 23,958 — 16,175 35,316 — 13,655 21,155 13,341 4,509 4,310 2010 22,151 — 14,011 31,894 — 12,104 19,682 12,196 3,781 3,427 2009 19,898 — 12,361 18,047 10,863 10,350 16,359 10,781 3,287 3,006 2008 23,696 — 15,033 20,973 14,096 11,023 20,237 12,459 3,390 3,221 2007 22,833 2737 14,105 19,239 12,735 9,861 20,049 9,318 2,843 3,070 2006 22,493 3770 13,010 17,339 12,555 9,086 19,334 8,076 2,363 2,693 2005 20,657 3397 11,108 16,112 12,316 7,584 17,304 7,212 1,703 2,416 2004 18,608 2482 9,851 15,154 11,266 6,530 15,701 7,073 1,266 2,241 2003 17,403 2223 7,333 14,203 9,184 5,937 13,395 6,762 998 2,027 2002 15,871 2021 7,353 12,410 9,152 5,522 13,916 6,915 635 1,832 2001 15,639 2035 7,972 13,211 9,592 5,555 16,087 8,253 320 1,763 2000 18,117 2309 9,129 15,321 10,957 5,650 19,331 9,181 105 1,760 1999 16,090 2164 8,024 14,901 9,868 4,736 17,967 8,460 — 1,696 1998 16,299 1983 7,299 14,630 8,707 4,164 17,518 8,556 — 1,581 1997 15,856 1887 6,361 14,204 9,984 3,817 17,335 8,501 — 1,457 1996 15,136 1752 5,487 13,318 9,751 3,407 16,317 7,704 — 1,307 Note: US Airways and America West started to report combined on-time data in January 2006 and combined tra#ic and financial data in October 2007 following their 2005 merger announcement.
Recommended publications
  • Domestic Airline Competition, Legacy Carrier Consolidation and the Rise of the Low-Cost Carrier
    DOMESTIC AIRLINE COMPETITION, LEGACY CARRIER CONSOLIDATION AND THE RISE OF THE LOW-COST CARRIER A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Public Policy in Public Policy By Christian T. Ueland, B.S. Washington, DC April 13, 2017 Copyright 2017 by Christian T. Ueland All Rights Reserved ii The research and writing of this thesis is dedicated to my family and friends. Many thanks, Christian Ueland iii DOMESTIC AIRLINE COMPETITION, LEGACY CARRIER CONSOLIDATION AND THE RISE OF THE LOW-COST CARRIER Christian T. Ueland, B.S. Thesis Advisor: Terry Kennedy, Ph.D. ABSTRACT In the past eight years, the airline market in the United States has gone through a string of bankruptcies, some brought on by the severe economic recession in 2008 and 2009. These financial difficulties provided the impetus for four giant airline mergers, causing concern that market concentration had exceeded a healthy limit. This paper examines the competitive landscape of domestic air travel through an analysis of the relationship between airline fares and different levels of competition in the domestic airline market. Taking US Department of Transportation data from 2008 and 2016, I use an ordinary least squares (OLS) regression model to determine the relationship between average market fares and the type/number of competing airlines in each airport-pair market. The results for each year represent the strength of competitive forces, which I then compare to determine the manner in which competition has changed over the eight-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • IDA Currently Has 3 Scheduled Airli
    General Information on Airline Service Development at the Idaho Falls Regional Airport (IDA) IDA currently has 3 scheduled airlines (United, Delta and Allegiant) with Direct flights to Salt Lake City, Utah; Denver, Colorado; Las Vegas, Nevada; Phoenix/Mesa Arizona and seasonal summer service to Minneapolis-St. Paul, Oakland and Los Angeles California. In addition, Air Charter companies on the field offer direct flights to Boise and other destinations on demand. The airport is a landlord for the airlines and has very little say in where airlines fly, the ticket prices they charge or the level of customer service they may or may not provide. We do stay in close contact with all the airlines, attend their conferences and meet with their headquarter offices to offer suggestions and insight into our market and to market our airport and community in effort to attract new routes. We also partner with a very competent and successful air service development consultant to assist us in this effort. However, in the end Airlines make their decisions based on profitability and they are ultimately in control. Air service is directly tied to the economy and how many people are flying. Air service is also driven by the amount of utilization of existing flights and individual airline business models. All these factors combine to reflect a continuous volatile airline industry. After safety and security, Air Service Development is a high priority for the Airport. We strive to be responsive to the community travel needs in both business and leisure routes. Our mission is to first maintain our existing airlines and routes (in the recent economy, many regional airports have lost air service).
    [Show full text]
  • AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT of STOL AIRCRAFT POTENTIAL INCLUDING TERMINAL AREA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Volume I
    NASA CONTRACTOR NASA CR-2424 REPORT CM AN ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF STOL AIRCRAFT POTENTIAL INCLUDING TERMINAL AREA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Volume I by H. L. Solomon and S. Sokolsky Prepared by THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION El Segundo, Calif. for Ames Research Center NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION • WASHINGTON, D. C. • MAY 1974 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA CR -2b2k 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date "An Economic Assessment of STOL Aircraft Potential Including MAY 197^ Terminal Area Environmental Considerations" Volume I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. H. L. Solomon and S. Sokolsky 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address The Aerospace Corporation 11. Contract or Grant No. El Segundo; California NAS 2-6473 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Contractor Report 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Final Report National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. .„ 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 1 5. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract This report presents the results of an economic and environmental study of short haul airline systems using short takeoff and landing (STOL) aircraft. The STOL system characteristics were .optimized for maximum patronage at a specified return on investment, while maintaining noise impact compatibility with the terminal area. Supporting studies of aircraft air pollution and .hub airport icongestion relief were also performed. The STOL concept specified for this study was an Augmentor Wing turbofan aircraft having a field length capability of 2,000 ft. and an effective perceived noise level of 95 EPNdB at. 500 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Engineering and Strategy: Returning to the Case of Southwest
    Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios ISSN: 0120-8160 [email protected] Universidad EAN Colombia Berrío Zapata, Cristian Engineering and strategy: returning to the case of southwest airlines, an analysis in production and technology management Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, núm. 73, julio-diciembre, 2012, pp. 209-217 Universidad EAN Bogóta, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=20625032013 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Casos empresariales ENGINEERING AND STRATEGY: RETURNING TO THE CASE OF SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, AN ANALYSIS IN PRODUCTION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT Cristian Berrío Zapata 1. INTRODUCTION ome company cases let us see what was a network that makes every part of it shake, when any done to produce business model innovation component is touched. This network, immersed into Sthat creates ruptures in the market, changing the environment evolution, is a complete systemic the rules of competition. One of these cases is the unit, where paradigm changes must be supported with story of Southwest Airlines (SWA). This article tries to operational actions so innovation becomes a living demonstrate that engineering operational excellence is force that changes competing profiles. This virtuous fruitless without a compatible moving in other conceptual cycle between thought and action, when successful axes like service, finances, administration and human in producing adaptative and innovative competing resources. The areas of a company are bounded into structures, revolves the markets and generates new rules for competition.
    [Show full text]
  • A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment John Grantham
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 72 | Issue 2 Article 10 2007 A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment John Grantham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation John Grantham, A Free Bird Sings the Song of the Caged: Southwest Airlines' Fight to Repeal the Wright Amendment, 72 J. Air L. & Com. 429 (2007) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol72/iss2/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. A FREE BIRD SINGS THE SONG OF THE CAGED: SOUTHWEST AIRLINES' FIGHT TO REPEAL THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT JOHN GRANTHAM* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 430 II. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND .................... 432 A. THE BATTLE TO ESTABLISH AIRPORTS IN NORTH T EXAS .......................................... 433 B. PLANNING FOR THE SUCCESS OF THE NEW AIRPORT ........................................ 436 C. THE UNEXPECTED BATTLE FOR AIRPORT CONSOLIDATION ................................... 438 III. THE EXCEPTION TO DEREGULATION ......... 440 A. THE DEREGULATION OF AIRLINE TRAVEL ......... 440 B. DEFINING THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT RESTRICTIONS ................................... 444 C. EXPANDING THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT ........... 447 D. SOUTHWEST COMES OUT AGAINST THE LoVE FIELD RESTRICTIONS ............................... 452 E. THE END OF AN ERA OR THE START OF SOMETHING NEW .................................. 453 IV. THE WRIGHT POLICY ............................ 455 A. COMMERCE CLAUSE ................................. 456 B. THE WRIGHT AMENDMENT WILL REMAIN STRONG LAW IF ALLOWED .................................. 456 1. ConstitutionalIssues ......................... 456 2. Deference to Administrative Agency Interpretation...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Exploiting Opportunities for Airline Entry and Competition
    9310-03 Chapter 3 10/12/99 13:35 Page 99 3 M Exploiting Opportunities for Airline Entry and Competition Increased opportunities for entry and competition in the airline indus- try depend on the efficient provision of airport and airway capacity to accommodate current as well as new and varied aviation services. Yet ob- stacles persist, including longstanding rules that curb access to some of the country’s largest airports. There also are restrictions on how airport operators can raise and invest funds to meet demands for runways, ter- minal buildings, and gate space. Since deregulation, an imbalance has become increasingly evident. The speed and agility with which airlines have been able to respond to changing traveler demands surpass the ability of federal, state, and local governments to expand airport and airway capacity and to adopt pricing mechanisms that induce and ration that infrastructure more efficiently. The nation’s airport and airway infrastructure are not the only untapped opportunities for airline entry and competition. Federal law limits foreign ownership and operation of U.S.-based airlines; this is a prominent example of competitive opportunities diminished by govern- 99 9310-03 Chapter 3 10/12/99 13:35 Page 100 100 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY ment policy. Reconsideration of these restrictions—which reduce the flow of capital, management experience, and competing operators into the domestic airline industry—has been recommended by others and is again urged here. The airline ticket distribution system is another aspect of the indus- try that can open or close more possibilities for competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Bob Montgomery Vice President, Airport Affairs Southwest Airlines Co
    Testimony of Bob Montgomery Vice President, Airport Affairs Southwest Airlines Co. March 23, 2017 Good morning, Chairman Blunt, Senator Cantwell and members of this Subcommittee. I am Bob Montgomery, and I handle Airport Affairs for Southwest Airlines. I am happy to be here today. I started working for Southwest in 1977, as a Ramp Agent in Lubbock, Texas, when Southwest was just an intrastate airline. I’m proud to be in my 40th year with Southwest – a company that continues to grow and compete. Southwest now serves over 120 million Customers annually, employs over 53,000 “Co- Hearts,” and operates a fleet of over 700 Boeing 737 airplanes. As a longtime Southwest Employee, I am most proud that Southwest has never had an Employee layoff or furlough during its 46-year history and has provided its Employees with annual profit-sharing for 43 straight years. Over the past 33 years, I have focused almost exclusively on airports. My task in Airport Affairs is to work with Airport Directors like my fellow panel member, Rhonda Hamm- Niebruegge, to determine how best to meet infrastructure needs in airports all around the Country. In that role, I have overseen billions-upon-billions of dollars in airport capital investments at over 100 airports. We have been successful in small airports, such as the Country’s newest airport, Northwest Florida Beaches Airport in Panama City, Florida. We’ve been successful in medium, growing airports such as Austin Bergstrom Airport, or Dallas Love Field. We’ve found a way to meet the needs in airports ravaged by changing airline strategies, such as St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Large Irregular Air Carriers Their Contributions and Their Demise
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1955 The large irregular air carriers their contributions and their demise Jack Austin Ring The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ring, Jack Austin, "The large irregular air carriers their contributions and their demise" (1955). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7988. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7988 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LARGE IRREGULAR AIR CARRIERS, THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS AND THEIR DEMISE by JACK AUSTIN RING B. A,, College of Great Falla, 19^h Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts MONTANA STATE UNIVHtSITT 1932 Approved^by; alkU/Au airma rd o^ Examiners ah, Gràduate School Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP38789 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying the Smokefree Skies
    FLYING THE SMOKEFREE SKIES airspace may reduce, 1964 The U.S. Surgeon General’s Report but cannot eliminate, identifies smoking as a cause of increased nonsmoker exposure to mortality and as a contributing factor in a host of environmental tobacco diseases. smoke.” Airline smoking section Flight attendant Patty Young sign from the 1970s* initiated efforts for smokefree flights in the 1960s and intensified lobbying efforts Also in 1986, the National Academy of Sciences in the 1980s. Ms. Young is (NAS) publishes “The Airliner Cabin Environment: currently a board member Air Quality and Safety.” of FAMRI (Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute).* 1971 United Airlines becomes the first carrier to offer separate smoking and nonsmoking sections. 1973 The Civil Aeronautics Board requires separate smoking and nonsmoking sections on airplanes. Muse Air (a Texas intrastate airline) In 1988, the Tobacco Institute’s “Smokers’ Rights 1982 Alliance” launched a letter writing campaign to opens its doors for business as a smokefree Congress and the Federal Aviation Administration, airline. in an effort to block the adoption of smokefree flight policies. The campaign failed.** 1986 The U.S. Surgeon General’s Report identifies secondhand smoke as a cause of death In the publication, NAS reports that the nation’s and disease and declares: “The simple separation flight attendants are exposed to smoke levels of smokers and nonsmokers within the same similar to those of a person living with someone who smokes a pack a day, and recommends a Aviation and tobacco “ban on smoking on all domestic commercial industries were often flights.” depicted together in advertisements.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Airlines You Are Now Free to Move About the Country.™
    TB0333 Rev. 03/2017 Andrew Inkpen Southwest Airlines You are now free to move about the country.™ Southwest Airlines (Southwest), the once scrappy underdog in the U.S. airline industry, was one of the largest U.S. airlines and, based on number of passengers, one of the largest in the world. Te company, unlike all of its major competitors, had been consistently proftable for decades and had weathered energy crises, the September 11 terrorist attacks, and the 2008-09 recession. An insight into Southwest’s operating philosophy can be found in the company’s 2001 annual report: Southwest was well poised, financially, to withstand the potentially devastating hammer blow of September 11. Why? Because for several decades our leadership philosophy has been: we manage in good times so that our Company and our People can be job secure and prosper through bad times.… Once again, after September 11, our philosophy of managing in good times so as to do well in bad times proved a marvelous prophylactic for our Employees and our Shareholders. Now in its 45th year of service, Southwest was facing some major challenges. Legacy carriers in the United States had become more efcient, and the mega-mergers involving Delta/Northwest, Continental/United, and American/US Airways were shaking up the industry. Smaller companies like JetBlue, Alaska, and Spirit were pressuring Southwest’s cost advantage and low-fare focus. Southwest had the highest labor cost per employee in the U.S. airline industry. With more than 50,000 employees, the company was a long way from the small scrappy upstart challenging the industry with its innovative strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • General Information on Airline Service Development at the Idaho Falls Regional Airport (IDA)
    General Information on Airline Service Development at the Idaho Falls Regional Airport (IDA) IDA currently has three scheduled airlines (United, Delta, and Allegiant) with direct flights to Salt Lake City, Utah; Denver, Colorado; Las Vegas, Nevada; Phoenix-Mesa, Arizona, and Oakland and Los Angeles, California, as well as seasonal summer service to Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. In addition, air charter companies on the field offer direct flights to Boise and other destinations on demand. The airport is a landlord for the airlines and has very little say in where airlines fly, the ticket prices they charge, or the level of customer service they may or may not provide. The airport administration does stay in close contact with all the airlines, attends their conferences, and meets with their headquarter officers to offer suggestions and insights into the IDA market as well as to market our airport and community in an effort to attract new routes. IDA also partners with a very competent and successful air service development consultant to assist in this effort. However, in the end, airlines make their decisions based on profitability, and they are ultimately in control. Air service is directly tied to the economy and how many people are flying. Air service is also driven by the amount of utilization of existing flights and individual airline business models. All these factors combine to reflect a continuously volatile airline industry. After safety and security, air service development is a high priority for the airport. IDA strives to be responsive to the community travel needs in both business and leisure routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Order JO 7400.2N Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters Table of Contents
    ORDER JO 7400.21 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: -XQH SUBJ: Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters This order specifies procedures for use by all personnel in the joint administration of the airspace program. The guidance and procedures herein incorporate into one publication as many orders, notices, and directives of the affected services as possible. Although every effort has been made to prescribe complete procedures for the management of the different airspace programs, it is impossible to cover every circumstance. Therefore, when a situation arises for which there is no specific procedure covered in this order, personnel must exercise their best judgment. The order consists of six parts: a. Part 1 addresses general procedures applicable to airspace management. b. Part 2 addresses policy and procedures unique to Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. c. Part 3 addresses policy and procedures unique to Airport Airspace Analysis. d. Part 4 addresses policy and procedures unique to Terminal and En Route Airspace. e. Part 5 addresses policy and procedures unique to Special Use Airspace. f. Part 6 addresses policy and procedures regarding the integration of Outdoor Laser Operations, High Intensity Light Operations, and integration of Rocket and Launch-Vehicle Operations into the National Airspace System. Digitally signed by Natasha A. Natasha A. Durkins Date: 2021.05.13 Durkins 07:33:04 -04'00' 1DWDVKD$'XUNLQV Director, 3ROLF\$-93 Air Traffic OrganizatioQ Distribution: Electronic Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services RECORD OF CHANGES DIRECTIVE NO. JO 7400.2N CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS TO OPTIONAL TO OPTIONAL BASIC BASIC FAA Form 1320−5 (6−80) USE PREVIOUS EDITION 6/17/21 JO 7400.2N Explanation of Changes Basic Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI).
    [Show full text]