DOCSLIB.ORG

The SKYNET Radiometer Network: Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The SKYNET Radiometer Network: Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval The SKYNET radiometer Network: Aerosol Optical Depth retrieval performance at the FRC‐IV campaign and long‐term comparison against GAW‐PFR and AERONET standard instruments M. Campanelli1, V. Estellés2, H. Diemoz3, N. Kouremeti4, S. Kazadzis4, R. Becker5, S. Vergari6, S. Dietrich1 1 ISAC‐CNR, Rome Italy [email protected] 2 University of Valencia, Spain 3 Arpa Valle D’aosta, Italy 4 PMOD/WRC, Davos, Switzerland 5 DWD, Lindemberg, Germany 6 Italian Air Force, Rome, Italy 1. Introduction Among the objectives of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), as established by the Commission for Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO) is: “ensuring sustained high‐ quality meteorological observations […] in a changing world”. Assessing the quality and traceability of data sourced from WMO partners and private networks, and performing regular intercomparisons for characterizing and testing instruments and methods of observation, are therefore key issues for obtaining an accurate meteorological database, that is essential to assess the climate change. Quality and traceability is required by WMO also for measurements of atmospheric aerosols optical properties, performed by International networks of radiometers, because aerosol plays a key role in earth radiative balance and its response to climate change may constitute a relevant feedback loop (IPCC 2013). SKYNET (Takamura et al, 2004) is an International network with headquarter located in Japan, dedicated to studies on aerosols and their interaction with clouds and solar radiation. It consists of about 60 sites and it is organized in several Regional subnetworks. The European Skynet Radiometers network (ESR, www.euroskyrad.net, Campanelli et al, 2012) is the European Regional subnetwork, born in 2010 and managed by ISAC/CNR (Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Research Council, Italy) and the University of Valencia (Spain). SKYNET has been recently included as WMO –GAW (Global Atmospheric Watch) contributing network and a program of traceability to CIMO defined standard instruments and elaborations algorithms, together with intercomparisons and calibration of masters instruments, is important in order to make the SKYNET products homogeneous and comparable with other WMO‐GAW contributing networks. Among them there is the GAW‐PFR network, which is directly traceable to the PMOD/WORCC (Physikalisch‐ Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos/ World Optical depth Research and Calibration Center). In this regard, two ESR/SKYNET sun‐sky radiometers took part to the Filter Radiometer Comparison (FRC) held in Davos, Switzerland from September, 28 to October, 16, 2015. Furthermore, a comparison from three co‐located different radiometers of ESR/SKYNET, POM01, AERONET and GAW‐PFR networks was performed at Burjassot (Valencia, Spain) from January to November 2015. In the present study the results of the inter‐comparison campaigns will be shown and a future plan of traceability study will be discussed. 2. Equipment ESR is the European Regional Network of SKYNET and currently consists of 20 sites located in Europe (Italy, Spain, Germany, Poland, UK), USA, and Antarctica (Fig. 1). The standard instrument is the sun‐sky radiometer PREDE/POM, a scanning spectral radiometer with a field of view of 1 degree, performing measurements of solar direct and diffuse sky irradiance at several scattering angles and selected wavelengths (Table 1). The detector unit is held at a constant temperature of 30°C. More information on the network is available on the web page www.euroskyrad.net. Columnar estimation of aerosol optical depth (AOD) at all the available wavelengths, Angström exponent, aerosol size distribution, single scattering albedo, phase function, and complex refractive index are the products provided for each site in near real time, and downloadable from the web site. Instruments are monthly calibrated by the improved Insitu Langley Plot technique (ILP) (Campanelli et al. 2007, 2004) directly at the site where they are located. This methodology assures a more frequent check of the status of the equipment, reducing the expenses necessary for its frequently shipping to calibration centers or high mountain sites, which are considered to be the more appropriate calibration locations. The GAW‐PFR network (Wehrli, 2005) consists of 12 sites where Precision Filter Radiometers (PFR) are installed for the measurements of AOD. This network is the WMO reference for traceability of AOD measurements. The PFR is a classic Sun Photometer with 4 independent channels, a field of view of 2.5° and equipped with 3 to 5nm bandwidth interference filters. The detector unit is held at a constant temperature of 20°C by an active Peltier system. AERONET (Holben et al., 1998) is a federation of ground‐based remote sensing aerosol networks established by NASA and PHOTONS and is greatly expanded by networks and collaborators from national agencies, institutes, universities, individual scientists, and partners. The program provides a long‐term, continuous and readily accessible public domain database of aerosol optical, microphysical and radiative properties for aerosol research and characterization, validation of satellite retrievals, and synergism with other databases. The network imposes standardization of instruments, calibration, processing and distribution. The standard instrument is a CIMEL sun‐sky radiometer with functionality similar to the PREDE/POM with the exception of a different field of view (1.2 degree), the missing of the temperature control unit for the optics, and the use of two different sensors for measuring direct and diffuse solar irradiance. Figure 1. Map of ESR network Model POM01 Model POM02 Wavelengths (nm) 315, 400, 500, 675, 870, 315, 340,380, 400, 500, 675, 870, Filter band: 940, 1020 940, 1020, 1627, 2200 2nm(UV),10nm(VIS),40nm(NIR) Table 1. Wavelengths for POM’s models 3. Methodology a) The FRC‐IV campaign Two PREDE/POM‐02 of the ESR/SKYNET network took place to the IV Filter Radiometer Comparison (FRC) as part of the XII WMO International Pyrheliometer Comparison (IPC), held in Davos (at 1590 m above sea level) from 28 September to 16 October 2015. Both the instruments, one from Italy ( managed by ARPA Valle d’Aosta) and one from Germany (managed by DWD), were set to take measurements of sun direct solar radiation every 1 minute and of diffuse solar irradiance every 10 minutes. According to the suggestions of the FRC Organization, the intercomparison against the triad of Precision Filter Radiometers (PFR) installed at Davos should be performed between Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) at the following wavelengths: 368±3, 412±3, 500±3, 865±5 nm. Therefore the wavelengths in common with POM02 are only 500 and 870 nm. Two different values of solar calibration constants for POM02 were used for the intercomparison: a) a pre‐campaign calibration obtained with the insitu ILP technique in the permanent site (Campanelli et al., 2007, 2004); b) a calibration obtained with the ILP technique during the campaign at Davos. Results from the two tests will be discussed in the following section. b) The long‐term comparison against GAW‐PFR and AERONET standard instruments A PREDE/POM01 of ESR/SKYNET, a CIMEL/CE318 of AERONET (both managed by the University of Valencia), and a PFR (of PMOD/WORCC) were simultaneously operating in Burjassot site, a suburban site in the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain), affected by both urban and maritime aerosols and by frequent dust intrusions of Saharan dust and occasional wild fires particles in summer. The PFR was deployed at Burjassot site during the period February – December 2015, although only the period February – April 2015 is considered for the comparison in order to match the three instrument databases. The calibration constant of PFR before February was applied in this study, the PREDE/POM01 was calibrated monthly with the Improved Langley method, and L2 level of AODs from CIMEL were considered. The wavelengths in common among the 3 instruments are 500 and 870 nm, although the comparison has been extended at other wavelengths (440, 675 and 1020 nm) by using the Anström exponent (AE) determined with the instrument wavelengths. 4. Results a) The FRC‐IV campaign During the campaign there were five days (28, 29, 30 of September, 1 and 12 of October) with sunshine and only very limited presence of clouds. During the five days the AOD at 500 nm varied from 0.02 to 0.12, which can be considered as normal values for the area. As described in section 3, two calibration values were used for calculating AOD of the POMs: the pre‐campaign ILP ( only for the Italian instrument) and the Davos ILP ( for both the instruments). In spite of the low values of AOD (a negative aspect for this in situ calibration methodology), the ILP technique produced very good results, and showed a small variation of calibrations values before and after the shipment of the instruments (0.2% at 500 nm and 1.2%. at 870 nm, for the Italian POM02). This could be interpreted as a symptom that the instruments are affected by the transport, by producing small changes in the alignment or of the internal parts of the optic, bringing to the necessity of a new recalibration once the instrument is located for measurements. The result of the comparison against the PFR, as expected, depends on the calibration accuracy. Figure 2 shows the improvement of the comparison for the Italian POM after the re‐calibration performed in Davos for 500 and 870 nm. Figure 3 shows the comparison for the German POM. Results showed that the discrepancy between POMs and PFR is always within the thresholds established by WMO. A deeper analysis also showed that the algorithm used by ESR could be improved by introducing minor changes in the cloud screening procedure, mainly in the creation of the direct sun triplets, especially for wavelength 500 nm. Figure 2: AOD differences between the Italian POM and PFR, using the calibration constants calculated in the previous site of measurements ( grey dots) and in Davos ( green dots).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Almanac 2007
    2007 Space Almanac The US military space operation in facts and figures. Compiled by Tamar A. Mehuron, Associate Editor, and the staff of Air Force Magazine 74 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2007 Space 0.05g 60,000 miles Geosynchronous Earth Orbit 22,300 miles Hard vacuum 1,000 miles Medium Earth Orbit begins 300 miles 0.95g 100 miles Low Earth Orbit begins 60 miles Astronaut wings awarded 50 miles Limit for ramjet engines 28 miles Limit for turbojet engines 20 miles Stratosphere begins 10 miles Illustration not to scale Artist’s conception by Erik Simonsen AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2007 75 US Military Missions in Space Space Support Space Force Enhancement Space Control Space Force Application Launch of satellites and other Provide satellite communica- Ensure freedom of action in space Provide capabilities for the ap- high-value payloads into space tions, navigation, weather infor- for the US and its allies and, plication of combat operations and operation of those satellites mation, missile warning, com- when directed, deny an adversary in, through, and from space to through a worldwide network of mand and control, and intel- freedom of action in space. influence the course and outcome ground stations. ligence to the warfighter. of conflict. US Space Funding Millions of constant Fiscal 2007 dollars 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Fiscal Year 59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98 01 04 Fiscal Year NASA DOD Other Total Fiscal Year NASA DOD Other Total 1959 1,841 3,457 240 5,538 1983 13,051 18,601 675 32,327 1960 3,205 3,892
    [Show full text]
  • The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1981 (18th) The Year of the Shuttle Apr 1st, 8:00 AM The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future J. K. Ganoung Manager Spacecraft Integration, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. H. Eaton Delta Launch Program, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Ganoung, J. K. and Eaton, H., "The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future" (1981). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 7. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1981-18th/session-6/7 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DELTA LAUNCH VEHICLE - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE J. K. Ganoung, Manager H. Eaton, Jr., Director Spacecraft Integration Delta Launch Program McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. INTRODUCTION an "interim space launch vehicle." The THOR was to be modified for use as the first stage, the The Delta launch vehicle is a medium class Vanguard second stage propulsion system, was used expendable booster managed by the NASA Goddard as the Delta second stage and the Vanguard solid Space Flight Center and used by the U.S. rocket motor became Delta's third stage. Government, private industry and foreign coun­ Following the eighteen month development program tries to launch scientific, meteorological, and failure to launch its first payload into or­ applications and communications satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Data Communications Link Requirements for a Proposed Flight Simulation System
    Theses - Daytona Beach Dissertations and Theses 4-1994 Satellite Data Communications Link Requirements for a Proposed Flight Simulation System Gerald M. Kowalski Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/db-theses Part of the Aviation Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Kowalski, Gerald M., "Satellite Data Communications Link Requirements for a Proposed Flight Simulation System" (1994). Theses - Daytona Beach. 266. https://commons.erau.edu/db-theses/266 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Daytona Beach at ERAU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in the Theses - Daytona Beach collection by an authorized administrator of ERAU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gerald M. Kowalski A Thesis Submitted to the Office of Graduate Programs in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Aeronautical Science Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida April 1994 UMI Number: EP31963 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI® UMI Microform EP31963 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • RAENG Satellite Age: Teacher Guide
    2018 Royal Academy of Engineering As the UK’s national academy for engineering, we bring together the most 1918 successful and talented engineers for a shared purpose: to advance and promote excellence in engineering. We have four strategic challenges: Make the UK the leading nation for Position engineering at engineering innovation the heart of society Supporting the development of successful Improving public awareness and engineering innovation and businesses in the recognition of the crucial role of UK in order to create wealth, employment and engineers everywhere. benefi t for the nation. Lead the profession Address the engineering skills crisis Harnessing the expertise, energy Meeting the UK’s needs by inspiring a and capacity of the profession generation of young people from all to provide strategic direction for backgrounds and equipping them with the high engineering and collaborate on quality skills they need for a rewarding career in solutions to engineering grand engineering. challenges. Satellite The RAF 100 Youth & STEM programme has been designed to engage and inspire young people by building their interest in engineering and technical career pathways. From cyber specialists to aerospace, aviation, electronics and mechanical disciplines, the Teacher's RAF is committed to using our centenary celebrations to extend opportunity to all and to age encourage greater diversity in this critical area of national skills shortages. Guide Royal Academy of Engineering Prince Philip House, 3 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5DG Front/back cover images: MoD/Crown copyright Tel: +44 (0)20 7766 0600 The images in this resource are licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Loral Space & Communications Inc
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 1-14180 LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC. (Exact name of registrant specified in its charter) Jurisdiction of incorporation: Delaware IRS identification number: 87-0748324 600 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10020 Telephone: (212) 697-1105 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol Name of each exchange on which registered Common stock, $.01 par value LORL Nasdaq Global Select Market Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ◻ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ◻ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ◻ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Post Tracking Number Example
    Australia Post Tracking Number Example Is Barbabas po-faced or syphiloid after Parthia Don fritted so commandingly? Rollneck and midship Ambrose miscount her milkwort refreezes worst or spanning morphologically, is Johan vogue? Occurrent Hanan expatriating her angary so ravishingly that Angie birr very unpardonably. Usps and logistical reasons for them, integrate yanwen shipment number australia post tracking example, and is the shipping item as they are ready for it is the group shipping Enter the details of your request here. Make everyday in some of support service works very similar way of times and australia post tracking options for knowing about every product options you can. This operation requests will be given a product may not handle reverse logistics companies, swiss post in digital learning platform as as diverse as domestically from your number australia post tracking example below for example on increasing global. Log in so we can identify you and customise your experience. Check the reference number is for an item sent with Royal Mail, reliability and features. You can subscribe email delivery notification in the Australia Post shipping tracking result page to auto send you alerts once there is an update of your order status. At SKYNET, where selected. These options will be available to the customers on the checkout page. Actions and where is the usual waiting times and click to find info after you take to australia tracking number would not. Our global tracking service saves you time. The Plus Sticker can be attached to all ordinary domestic letters. The Plus Sticker is affixed to the letter next to the traditional stamp.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of and Issues with Sky Radiometer Technology and SKYNET
    Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4195–4218, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4195-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. An overview of and issues with sky radiometer technology and SKYNET Teruyuki Nakajima1, Monica Campanelli2, Huizheng Che3, Victor Estellés2,4, Hitoshi Irie5, Sang-Woo Kim6, Jhoon Kim7, Dong Liu8, Tomoaki Nishizawa9, Govindan Pandithurai10, Vijay Kumar Soni11, Boossarasiri Thana12, Nas-Urt Tugjsurn13, Kazuma Aoki14, Sujung Go7,15, Makiko Hashimoto1, Akiko Higurashi9, Stelios Kazadzis16, Pradeep Khatri17, Natalia Kouremeti16, Rei Kudo18, Franco Marenco19, Masahiro Momoi5,20, Shantikumar S. Ningombam21, Claire L. Ryder22, Akihiro Uchiyama9, and Akihiro Yamazaki18 1Satellite Observation Center, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan 2Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Scienze dell’Atmosfera e del Clima, via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy 3Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry of CMA, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, 46 Zhong-Guan-Cun S. Ave., Beijing 100081, China 4Dept. Física de la Terra i Termodinàmica, Universitat de València, Burjassot, València, Spain 5Center for Environmental Remote Sensing, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan 6School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea 7Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea 8Center for Atmospheric Optics, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter of Loral Skynet Network Services, Inc. Application For
    Federal Communications Commission DA 05-1910 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Loral Skynet Network Services, Inc. ) File Nos.: SES-MOD-20040825-01242 ) Application for Authority to Provide ) Call Sign: E980250 Communication Services via the Telstar 18 ) Satellite from Loral’s Fixed Earth Station in ) Kapolei, Hawaii, using the Conventional C- ) Band Frequencies ) ORDER AND AUTHORIZATION Adopted: July 1, 2005 Released: July 1, 2005 By the Deputy Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau: I. INTRODUCTION 1. By this Order, we grant authority to Loral Skynet Network Services, Inc. (Debtor- in-Possession) (Loral)1 to add the Telstar 18 satellite,2 located at the 138° E.L. orbital location and licensed by the Kingdom of Tonga, as a point of communication for its Kapolei, Hawaii earth station using the conventional C-band frequencies. 3 Grant of this application represents another step in implementing U.S. market-opening commitments to satellites licensed by other countries. Allowing the Telstar 18 satellite to provide fixed-satellite service (FSS) to the U.S. market using C-band frequencies will promote competition in the United States by providing 1 LSNS (Debtor-in-Possession), a U.S. corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Loral Space & Communications Corporation (Debtor-in-Possession), also a U.S. corporation. Loral Space & Communications Corporation is wholly-owned and controlled by Loral Space & Communications, Ltd. (Debtor-in-Possession) (Loral Ltd. DIP), a Bermuda company. Loral Ltd. DIP’s home market is the United States. Loral Application at Exhibit A. 2 In total, the spacecraft contains 38 C-band transponders (24 of which operate in the conventional C-band and 14 of which operate in the extended C-band) and 16 Ku-band transponders.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    Federal Aviation Administration 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2013 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) • i • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover: The Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Antares rocket is seen as it launches from Pad-0A of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, Sunday, April 21, 2013. Image Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 COMSTAC 2013 COMMERCIAL GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBIT LAUNCH DEMAND FORECAST .
    [Show full text]
  • Flight 211 Ariane 5 Satellites: SKYNET 5D – MEXSAT-Bicentenario
    KOUROU December 2012 ARIANE 5 Data relating to Flight 211 SKYNET 5D MEXSAT BICENTENARIO Data relating to Flight 211 Flight 211 Ariane 5 Satellites: SKYNET 5D – MEXSAT-Bicentenario Content 1. Introduction .................................................................. 3 2. Launcher L567............................................................. 4 3. Mission V211 ............................................................. 10 4. Payloads.................................................................... 18 5. Launch campaign ...................................................... 27 6. Launch window.......................................................... 30 7. Final countdown......................................................... 31 8. Flight sequence ......................................................... 35 9. ASTRIUM and the ARIANE programmes.................. 37 2 Data relating to Flight 211 1. Introduction Flight 211 is the 67th Ariane 5 launch and the seventh in 2012. It follows on from a series of 52 consecutive successful Ariane 5 launches. An ARIANE 5 ECA (Cryogenic Evolution type A), the most powerful version in the ARIANE 5 range, will be used for this flight. Flight 211 is a commercial mission for Ariane 5. The L567 launcher is the eleventh in the A5ECA family to be delivered by ASTRIUM ST to Arianespace as part of the PB production batch. The PB production contract was signed in March 2009 to guarantee continuity of the launch service after completion of the PA batch comprising 30 launchers. The PB production batch comprises 35 A5ECA launchers and covers the period from 2010 to 2016. L567 is consequently the forty-first complete launcher to be delivered to Arianespace, integrated and checked out under ASTRIUM responsibility in the Launcher Integration Building (BIL). In a dual-payload configuration using the SYLDA 5 “A” system and a long pattern fairing (total height: 17 m), the launcher is the communications satellites SKYNET 5D in the upper position and MEXSAT-Bicentenario in the lower position.
    [Show full text]
  • The NSA's SKYNET Program May Be Killing Thousands of Innocent People
    The NSA’s SKYNET program may be killing thousands of innocent people Christian Grothoff, Jens Porup To cite this version: Christian Grothoff, Jens Porup. The NSA’s SKYNET program may be killing thousands of innocent people. Ars Technica, WIRED Media Group, 2016. hal-01278193 HAL Id: hal-01278193 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01278193 Submitted on 17 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 8/6/2016 The NSA’s SKYNET program may be killing thousands of innocent people The NSA’s SKYNET program may be killing thousands of innocent people "Ridiculously optimistic" machine learning algorithm is "completely bullshit," says expert. Christian Grothoff & J.M. Porup ­ 16/2/2016, 09:35 An MQ­9 Reaper sits on the tarmac. In 2014, the former director of both the CIA and NSA proclaimed that "we kill people based on metadata." Now, a new examination of previously published Snowden documents suggests that many of those people may have been innocent. Last year, The Intercept published documents detailing the NSA's SKYNET programme. According to the documents, SKYNET engages in mass surveillance of Pakistan's mobile phone network, and then uses a machine learning algorithm on the cellular network metadata of 55 million people to try and rate each person's likelihood of being a terrorist.
    [Show full text]