Conference
The Accounts of Society National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel 12‐13 June 2014
Invited paper The 2007–2009 Financial Crisis and Recession: Reflections in the National Accounts Prepared by: Brent R. Moulton, US Bureau of Economic Analysis
INVITED PAPER con cop MOULTON 2.indd 1 03/06/14 11:38 2 3
INVITED PAPER con cop MOULTON 2.indd 2 03/06/14 11:38 2 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 3
Invited Paper major Abstract: describe thank Comparing predominant but and lending data have
Accounts steps there extent
gaps
had,
that François developed
or
Paper
some
at
The were
that but are borrowing,
of Public
the
pattern
recovery. financial which
being prepared
were of
Lequiller, notable
Service
countries. the Debt,”
taken exposed the
main
was and
crisis
variations The of
for
national who and
a Economic
on to features
presentation sharp This
national of
The
address by Bonnie balance provided
2007–2009
the paper
accounts
2007–2009 decline between Reflections
of
crisis—relevant
and accounts Retus,
these
sheets.
US the
uses extensive
Monetary at
for Bureau
Great were led
countries Eurostat measurement who the
several The
Brent
also Financial to
in
national
unable Recession. prepared
May, a comments
of paper the
allow
global
Policy
3 R.
Economic information
conference, quarters
in
1
National Moulton
2014
the to
concludes
accounts us Crisis
recession
Making,”
gaps. the provide.
to In
extent
and
followed terms compare Analysis charts
and
Accounts that wrote “The
data
National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService of
with
It 12–13 that
Recession:
of
and policy the also
Accounts
for
gross by the
the a impacted
Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014
downturn figures.
discussion
discusses
a June OECD
box,
effects makers slow,
domestic
2014,
“Measuring of countries
sluggish
almost
Society on
would and some
of
Luxembourg. saving,
product, some
The Accounts ofSociety the
all
of Eurostat Conference
recovery, – like to
speed National and the of
of net
to
the
the
the
I
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 4
Invited Paper investors forecast macroeconomists 1. Brookings Actions freezing began facing US Annual the OECD the European heightened global peaked facing was expanded Bernanke August Paribas, banks the on that home US. to rate borrowers are more warning responses. discussing
subprime
three Federal
now financial liquidity With crisis Introduction
taken of it
than
countries mortgages in
a bankruptcy economy would trying
”; Conference
serious
2007,
in
During 2 1
In
run
one
the
the that totally
Martin
the
investment (2007), See See financial stage Institution,
throughout
Central the lending
September into possible 1
who 90 Reserve
level
However,
on
markets.
consequences loan world,
of system Federal Chris to
subprime halt
events days United
delinquencies
state
2000 when
deposits the Neal
interlinked, withdraw
were increased “ of
The of
(see losses
redemptions
on Bank Isidore markets were to until
this
overdue)
largest regulatory
announced and risk.
Fixing Baily,
Reserve
and
ownership. Bank through reached
Subprime funds
counteract
BNP considered States
the
Both
2007, few Figure 2
mortgages
the
able the in
until (2007), the
In
Robert world
Finance Structure
funds,
rapidly
the
that
the due for Treasury
Bank
and
Northern
to
began
1). (the 2006, the
Mortgage
“
The E. In began
Subprime
of especially
Series Bank
in
share
Litan, could and
March
St. to real
Source: Note: Louis proprietary transactions Finance mortgage been houses subprime financed
what use and
Rock,
rise Louis
Competition
of
– falling,
Market and estate
of
of be purchased
Paper
Federal The
England is
2008, Woes:
financed
sharply.
subprime FRED Agency’s
“subprime”
risky—grew
(2008), by a
now Matthew
the
mortgages, transactions S&P
threat index
conforming
,” which according 3 prices
(Federal
United
Figure Bear How speech (November).
Case widely Reserve
or by
provided
“ all (May that By 4 The
securitized
to “non
‐ ‐
mortgages
S. Far, Shiller transactions placed in
Stearns,
the 2 which
1.
includes Reserve
Johnson, the on to
given mortgages—that
Kingdom’s Financial
the 17). rapidly considered mortgages.
‐
United
How conforming”
single arranged first
US markets
tend a United
2000
stress at
national
by liquidity
Wide? Economic
all a
‐ half
The
family
Federal
States
during
“ to house Fannie
leading Crisis:
that types Q1 The
have
FHFA
fifth‐largest
on
of
States for –
” to and mortgages,
Origins composite
properties
were 2013
CNNMoney price of
house 2007,
Mae
A
debt
injection, Data),
more have Reserve the
it
index
mortgages Timeline US policy
to
is,
Q3
index.
and
or period, in
investment
that
volatile
of be
price news Federal
mortgages
been is Freddie foreclosure
such whose home the
the
Bank a
makers sold
mortgage It
was (March number
and of
and indexes
is Federal
Financial a reports
prices as
but Reserve
Events based
price Mac;
bubble. of to mortgages
jumbo weights secured in
Chicago’s
JP in
were
February
bank,
made
than 5); index it Housing
on
of
2006 Morgan
or and excludes lender, Bank
were
and Crisis and
repeat
other houses Prices
with
is
have
by Policy was to
of Ben a
the
,” 43rd
US St.
it
was
S.
03/06/14 11:38 5 4 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 5
Invited Paper Chase, objective It the differences forecast and falling the the of Happened explanations government database with might government that been bank Rogoff endeavored companies the Kingdom, 2008 interbank banking” the accounts Simon OECD’s credit extraordinary aggregate mentioned. Europe, Meltdown, York;
also the
first recession Euro 34 Federal
Freddie
policy
a ‐2009
Michael
in written
world’s
Johnson have risk.
(2009), discusses
into
discussion advanced GDP using
the
4 3
In On This Over
North half
and
from
area, Italy,
For In system, and rates of and
Vintage
July,
and
makers recession
recession in
the 2008, based 3 between been United
Reserve.
trying
Mac,
to
paper
of example, bonds, conservatorship.
Next a
Lewis prevent GDP
for
the This on
What October the balance and and
actions and
$30
where America,
of
withdraw 2009, other another
and
some
these
the
economies the
used next
the on of
based Time
world, which Books, the Canada—represented James the how
(2011),
to would billion describes States, to
first some short
purchasing
financial OECD
These
countries as
affected
avoid G7 such hand, and
see the 2013. Do
two to
paper sheets,
few of Is either subjects,
some on
GDP
US
and Kwok had
New
Different: try in was
about countries,
the
Robert funds ‐ The original loan like
since
term of largest purchasing countries filed
a weeks,
Greece,
financial In in
events this
to
major
provides Japan
grown
that
started the
steps the
York;
of kept
to Big turn,
crisis, (2010), to the with
On
GDP
It, guarantee restore power
in
for and then
US the avert
paper Shiller
and
have
data
Short: financial
Princeton
are the
September crisis
US Eight future
governments afloat
Roger
the that
set crisis
the plunged. bankruptcy. Treasury
and
though followed represented to imbalances
nor flee
institution,
doubtless to
13 the power
guarantors members
parities.
rate
the a gaps
had,
G7 (2008),
rival
off
does liquidity 77%
Inside primary Centuries
was decline other are summary Bankers:
does
Lowenstein to .
with what recovery
countries—United
from
crisis a
crisis of
University
but safety. that
of specific the
parities, being worldwide aggravated
not
rates—spiked,
Economic the
recovery. by
The it 15, the major the
happened
more which
the
in traditional
69% or provide and
focus of
The
and were
were Ireland, attempt IndyMac The
and of Doomsday
of
Lehman OECD’s
Subprime
of taken the announcement
the to has The
Financial
Fed.
securitized experiences according
(2010),
5
confidence. of
Wall next recession national
the Press,
central speed
will
being reflected
exposed first the
OECDs.
the
generally 3
TED activity It financial
by an
to Meanwhile,
period Portugal, GDP
Street to
will
day, be in
Bank, national
world’s Brothers,
half
Princeton; commercial Solution: The Machine, address a
analysis
States,
spread—the Folly, reflecting the provide on
this
written banks
crisis
based to next accounts
AIG, It
as
End by of
in Takeover the
mortgage
in the
recovery. of
failed.
crisis—the will of panic.
been Meanwhile,
Princeton
reflected
GDP most
2008.
Japan,
the the of
Spain of discuss recovery
of
accounts
National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService throughout
one several experience on IMF’s How
these
of
W.W. the an
provide
in Carmen a most Wall confidence
crisis—relevant accounts.
based much exchange slow
the
loan
On
years data, The countries banks, accounting
of
and fourth Today’s Germany,
and difference World
Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014
instruments,
measurement
Norton
Street, Many
the the policies September
University
OECD
other
in
and
so of inability
since
on the
heightened
M. were
a including other to GDP
the
‐called
largest up period
faced
summary
of exchange
Economic
largest
the
rates, Reinhart Next
Global come. erratic,
The books
Penguin
& in countries
countries
reached
to the national
2009 France,
throughout unable
that
Company, of countries.
world Euro
between
$85 of Press, Financial a paper
“shadow
or leading OECD
insurance
the
4
7, information Financial run
investment
the
economists have were
were and Although
76% particularly
and ‐area
rates, Outlook Press, billion levels gaps of Fannie
The Accounts ofSociety
United
took to
a Princeton; as accounts
financial Eurostat Conference
began concludes will how
of
in trough
Kenneth of
already
provide.
New
placed used investors
up
with
or
most the New
the
of Crisis also from
Mae
the 55% to
York;
or
the to
in
in
be
of of in
S.
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 6
Invited Paper earlier, importance Great beyond declining Europe, GDP. there Raghuram Germany’s recession fell 2. third Real accounts, In national 2014. University (GDP bolstered is another the of through 4.9% Them were reached of in 2009, in
the
the the Canada, the 2008,
into ensuing The
GDP
quarter
(see OECD Changes Coming,
synchronous volume
is Depression and third United recession,
and
5
The much The Over
the Although
In
recession
GDP Great 2.3% the its and
before
Except
only
Press, G. were
in such Table
another Europe,
on Stat
GDP
cyclical
quarter,
it scope
of financial impact Great Rajan second
the
institutional
in
the to Oxford
based
States
fell
as
interest the 0.1% in Recession
changes
Extracts as
Princeton; reflected
aggregate
where
rebounding 0.5%, 1 fell first
it
nominal
the
four
a
there (2011), in of
and
other during of
Recession reached
among the 0.1%
peak cumulative
of in
6.8%,
quarter on the University
and decreasing
the
this half sharp panic,
quarters specifically and the
Figure the
in
declines database,
the in
were
hand, measures
1930s. in
in real
Fault the
paper. in this
of and
GDP sector
aggregate and
second decreased Great
almost in
the
the decreases
expenditure its
many GDP 2008 with of
policy
the of 2). GDP some period, Gary
Lines:
Press, cyclical France’s
the and
second 2009, 7.2% fourth
from
in Most 2008–2009
5 0.5%,
and balance Recession
noted
fell fourth
The an
by
of all
quarter
real declined B. recession of
various
implications differences
How
New
increase in the an demand by strong
Gorton
of the
however, 5.7% with disposable
recession
of in
quarter then trough.
GDP most otherwise, quarter
GDP
advanced the additional
quarter,
the approach)
the other
Hidden first York. sheets.
of
large
from
price
was
fell 4.3%. second were
commodities was
(2012), cases
advanced
fourth fell began
2008.
quarter of and
of
balances
of
2.2%
Canada’s
among Fractures was
especially
declines
4.4%. 0.5%
the
the of
deflators income,
following
2007;
the
even
they 2009. economies.
aggregate
2.2%.
Misunderstanding
the But of quarter quarter relatively
most initially first 6 in source
of in
the
reflect
The 4
economies
more financial the the the it
In
the that 2008
In
Still
quarter in
real
then
saving, prices.
OECD
severe
severe
can all,
decline
the
fourth OECD the pace of economic
of of
second
relatively
the Threaten supply. severe. are
late,
GDP
all
to the
The 2008
2009. help
it bankruptcy first
countries data crisis,
of
decreased of the
included From
and
of global
countries
in
Great
quarter, that
real in as decreased
the
the
us
quarter 2008 quarter. and
Japan,
Financial
Furthermore, The first Among that
Italy’s
the
net the
activity
mild,
understand
analysis statistical
the GDP are descent
economic Recession the
UK World were quarter economy lending, to
in
in
third represented of 1.4%
where
GDP in 0.7%
with of of
the first GDP
the the aggregate GDP Crises:
Lehman 4.2%. as
the
available
the 2009,
of Economy,
data accelerated
first quarter
in quarterly began measured
OECD
quarter OECD
in turned
also of
the
timing
as real
downturn United the
the lasted
the
had Why
the
2009,
cited quarter well real
implications
fell
effects Brothers
GDP relative
first countries
on total somewhat
decreased first been
in We
of
Princeton
and of down
GDP
in as six 7.2%.
States February real the national
2008
by quarter fell
this 2009 Don’t quarter in
in
real quarters of since duration
of
real fell OECD the
the GDP
9.2%.
again paper 2009. and
the
in GDP See
is 24,
the
of
03/06/14 11:38
7 6 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 7
Invited Paper the began several the quarter
financial second
earlier
Belgium Austria td it U Canada Chile Czech Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy countries Korea Japan Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Norway Portugal Poland Slovak Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey Similar
of
2007
quarter
Zealand
Republic crisis
Republic
id Ki
and
patterns
to Country
experienced
lasted
led the
of
to 2010,
fourth
change
appeared longer the
12.8% collapse Table
quarter
especially
in than
real
1. among
2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2008 2007 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2007 2007 2007 2008 2008 2008 2008 below 2007 2008
Peak
in
of GDP, of Peak
the
Q1 Q2 Q1 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q2 Q4 Q4 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q3 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q4 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3
country’s
2009.
deep quarter,
its
most
OECD
other
cyclical
downturns.
of 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010 2009 2009 2009 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 countries,
trough OECD
three the Trough
7 peak. Q3 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q3 Q2 Q2 Q1 Q3 Q2 Q4 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q4 Q1 Q1 Q4 Q4 Q1 Q2
5 OECD
‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
countries; largest quarter, during
Estonia’s Ireland’s
countries
commercial
Change and the real
Iceland’s
National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService
Great GDP cumulative GDP GDP 13.3% 20.0% 10.4% 12.8% 11.5%
in outside 2% 7 4.3% 5.1% 4.2% 3.1% 5.6% 8.0% 4.4% 6.8% 8.5% 0.9% 9.2% 7.2% 4.6% 9.4% 6.7% 5.0% 2.6% 3.4% 0.4% 4.2% 8.5% 9.7% 5.0% 7.6% 3.3%
fell
fell Recession Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014
GDP banks,
11.5% 20.0%. of Number surpass
reached
the
the from
In
G7, pre
of Iceland, recession 11 13 12 17 10 12
quarters ‐ 9 9 7 * * * * * * 4 * 4 * * 9 * * 8 * 3 * * 8 * *
the
The Accounts ofSociety crisis though its
Eurostat Conference
trough fourth
peak
where
to
in
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 8
Invited Paper the that of and occurred
Source: the
fourth
only typically
global 6 At
OECD
by Source: in
quarter the
the 0.4%.
recession
denotes national
other
same
Australian The
of
end
accounts
2008,
quarter,
a only
and
recession.
of
National
Figure quarterly did though the
data
a
not
spectrum, fall
from
2.
Poland’s
Accounts experience
by Real of
decrease Stat
a 0.9%.
substantially GDP
Extracts a 2005
from
GDP 6
few for
The
in the
Q1
OECD
database. OECD the fell
Australia’s GDP
–
two
2013
Australian in 8
‐ larger total
6
of
only countries consecutive
Q3
Korea
and
one
amount, GDP
Bureau
G7
also quarter,
managed
during countries
quarters only
4.6%. of
Statistics
the
the fell
to The
Great
fourth for
of avoid
GDP
decline
website. one
Recession
the quarter
of quarter,
the in worst real
Slovak
of
again
effects
GDP 2008,
03/06/14 11:38 9 8 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 9
Invited Paper Republic and Financial As institutions be expenditures. reflected recession—a contributor (including was in experienced and 15.1% cumulative number manufacturing decline two example, the India other activity decline quarter China, financial the measures recession, contributed quarter 2.9% similar government
final
described considered
United period. Bureau retail quarters, concentrated
in experiencing hand,
over
we
pattern
demand
in in in OECD
7
The In Turning of of
of
crisis, also
The Crisis
in
South
aggregate aggregate the and lack construction
the
with
2008 2009, of
countries
States,
decline seven
serving
several to
emerging
national to
final two
data in Economic decrease
fell
countries United and
emerging
other
to the
seasonally
growth Affected falling gross of
real the
and Africa’s (see to to
imports
quarters
have in
consumption cited
change.
quarters
in
the the drop
only the the
was
households) box, components a
gross
transportation.
available imports exports manufacturing Figure
experienced value accounts
States single
15.2%
markets
GDP
construction Analysis avoided in in first major that
of
one
a in
during GDP Measures “Countercyclical markets
this
of real
relatively
adjusted
value new For demand, of
added
when of
quarter
3). was goods quarter, quarter was
from
paragraph of decreased decrease lasted
components
general the
data the
websites. also
The
dwellings), in the
the the expenditures added
smaller
final
adversely of
outside
it
Asia
Russian fell
downturns 2006 OECD
and
of
recession. quarterly
suggest decreases
provide effects
reached OECD GDP, mild of
industry a due
and For of the
Financial consumption little 16.3%
government
2009, appear
from falling are services decline,
to
2.7%
example, than to in
0.9%. in first
and
of Fiscal
countries
Federation
2008, from
which of of longer; total,
impacted the the
that information
the
its the from
but experienced
GDP
GDP
quarter
the begin the
not 28.5% over at Only were to
Services.”)
large
associated trough the
–1.9%, Policy fell
OECD,
third the China’s
the
before have
real
began global overall
only
2007 for measures
expenditures,
from
9 three
final national
later, 16.9%.
expenditures to
more
lasted
same from total share
by
private
the of
quarter
decreased
in been decline
7 in in and the
to
consumption falling rebounding the the recession. economy 2009,
on
the quarters, general decrease
the during
European
pronounced a
decrease 2005
time
goods
2009; only In of
impact
accounts Indonesia’s
value
long,
more
first drop
for
National
third (that contrast,
private
of
as but in
as three to that
the
2008 quarter in
most 10.7%
austerity distribution government steep the decreased
off added
National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService insulated
also the 2010.
quarter of with is,
in Brazil’s Finally,
the
was
databases Union, recovery
in
period,
in
GDP,
the first final
households
quarters,
Accounts,” expenditures,
advanced
to
OECD
in
2009. continued
countercyclical
United decline mortgage GDP a over
very
Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014
by Also,
of the gross Great
drop
quarter
consumption GDP measures though
but of
the
industry. 2008
from
2.7%
never 7
but four
countries
first
large,
2009. industries
phase, shown (See
finance final
States,
of nevertheless
fixed that volume decreased Recession from
countries.
the
to
fiscal
the 8.5% quarter and quarters. to activity over
and
the
declined. the
consumption
15.2%.
In
the
began
which
grow on
capital annual
would were the The recession,
nonprofit it
and contrast,
had
GDP fiscal box,
it experienced the policy
the index
The Accounts ofSociety
second fell of expenditures
can second
downturn Eurostat Conference
and of
varied.
throughout
5.4%
insurance
adopted. wholesale The decreased before
Eurostat
increased
For
of On
“How 11.5%.
general
formation
GDP a policy 2009,
For
hardly for
is by major Israel
the
the over
with
the
A the the
the
In
a
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 10
Invited Paper product Aggregate to for to supply. 242–245. Great services downward level Source:
be represent
the
falls.
an Recession.
United Although
8 Changes
Economists Aggregate
of
that OECD approximate
See, The
real sloping demand
these
are
for national
States aggregate
GDP
example,
demanded in After these
demand
curve concepts aggregate
often and and
accounts and
indicator
the
Figure are
the
supply in
demand
N. the explain
Great
theoretical which
represents
Gregory
by GDP in
data
3.
Euro demand
actual final Real
of
from
Recession,
price
recessions the curve aggregate
area,
GDP Mankiw users
Stat
economic volume
concepts, will the deflator),
can by
both
Extracts
and
2005 be relationship final
(2003), nominal
shift in demand.
areas reflected of the
terms Q1 expenditure
data. database.
output so the in
–
aggregate Macroeconomics,
2013 response showing the 10
GDP measures
of
8 Figure
between
in
movements demanded
Q3 shifts
in changes
category,
the
a
price 4 to
in
sharp
shows in
changes United aggregate the
the
level. in
Worth increases
OECD in
downward aggregate
nominal
national changes nominal
States
It monetary ‐
Publishers,
total is
demand
generally
as
GDP
resumed accounts in
volume
GDP shift the
the
(which or
aggregate and
New are
nominal during
fiscal drawn
of
growing,
can often aggregate
York,
goods is
policy.
be the the
as GDP
pp. taken
price used
a
and
8
03/06/14 11:38 11 10 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 11
Invited Paper pre Euro This though effects included have Because associated GDP—may particular, productivity in reductions Current Receipts federal government expenditures more Current Expenditures through Federal Act through Other Social Current Capital Gross the act the taxes additional refundable Source: taxes ‐recession
is
in area, of been first costs
because,
of and Table often
terms
it 2009 fixed
On Although or
US there (reductions)
transfer
Australia,
government
benefits government current
Countercyclical
taxes taxes transfer never quarter the reductions subsidies, An
nominal
the a regulations,
occurring with
be Bureau the
other
expenditures
capital
shocks, (additions) major in
A.
tax
the example in
recession.
of trend.
can on on harder
global are
taxes directly Share
other
the exhibited payments transfers
despite “stagflation”—that
increased payments credits)
income, income,
countercyclical
receipts, more of
of
formation boost
many
contributor Israel,
Federal
GDP
United Economic final
capital
changes 2013,
Nominal of or
during
in prices
hand, to
on of
(see costs
it Countercyclical
other difficult taxes (primarily
wealth, wealth, consumption the
characterize experienced Decreases
demand
factors and
countercyclical final
may fiscal
Korea, were accelerated government
expenditures about and
States,
transfers, changes of
recession Table the Analysis, of
for
in
or
revenues GDP
consumption
not
oil etc. etc.
the
policy to about
primarily the
to first
grants
that increases grants and policy
26%
and directly
the
A). (households) (corporations)
be
American which measure,
of
expenditures in
terms is, “
transaction in three
Federal
could Poland—countries
possible with
a most
consists
aggregate 74% or recession to other
in of growth a
aggregate
second aims to
Fiscal that
state
decline OECD reductions
and
fiscal the
for was
through
of state in national
years. in
OECD cause
recovery Recovery
or commodities
are to social aggregate & social trade, costs
reduced the
enacted Policy
to of
to
policy local gross countries,
slowdown
boost
and in in
intended
demand,
increases allow
easily came
After countries the supply—that
increases
most
to real
government) benefits benefits, programs 11 accounts
or
in
local
in fixed
and
was the
level
receipts
the
9 taxes.
in
it
accounting GDP the in identify supply
countries.
that government Reinvestment to
February
the the
the government; increased beginning to as capital deadweight
in of
National
catch fell and (such
associated
in or
boost
measured
data.
general also global potential American form
factors was
final
BEA gross in is, all
final
formation
up 2009, as
managed
a
changes
2009. In of statistics National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService aggregate of $825.4
shift consumption
sharply demand in unemployment
Accounts
to
Percent fixed
some the
government
additional consumption Act, may
came
losses
2011
GDP only with
the by Recovery though
in The effects Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014
by .” nominal
billion, capital
have in cases, the
previous
to of
25.7% 23.1 74.3 25.0 54.7 10.0 29.8 in 7.3% that to in acceleration
and
type 2.5 5.1 2.2
for
estimated associated
total
the avoid
the change,
level notable
expenditures. also commodities of enters is
of and was expenditures,
they
formation which
expenditures cost
first form
now
GDP,
the expenditures transaction
of benefits trend the contributed.
Reinvestment spent of
may half potential Although act such
GDP cost
far
exceptions of supply.
act with The Accounts ofSociety most sustained
appear in
Eurostat Conference line. reduced
through
below of inflation. be
by as of
and
changes
2008. of
The
the the
In
or
to
the its In
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 12
Invited Paper remained continued of that deterioration final 2008, terms 92.5.
directly. banks Banks measure insured investments securities items. February funds that prices) higher value they United in The declined rate, between effects national risk assets principal directly big
addition import consumption 9
emerging whereas of The
of cost
they pay but
9
of
into
and
in
default,
that In
trade average Source: of of States,
high
deposit In As on During increase
to
depositor
Although
accounts the
of as
to cases much are of
the 2013,
provide. commodities, both changes
fell
the
the other
the
boom. the
to
were these in part depositors. FISIM,
index National
as that the past
depositor
during
fees, countries
the
SNA, National
investments for
crisis which SNA depositor in
the of rate the
8–19).
accounts—causing
expenditure
of financial How GDP
classified
in
were which
services
due
terms that
example,
The
have banks A
in there
services (the
the financial balance which emerging energy “financial
of
proceeded, portion
the
expected
is
price Income
the
by
disconnect
The accounts increase interest
flight
regarded
ratio
and not The decided
is these mortgages
of were crisis,
usually
90
and
intermediaries can one Financial
is
as
FISIM
trade. prices recovered
index that recognized
both borrower margin
sheets,
crisis, assigned days of
of to
increased
nonperforming part
borrower
intermediation
and be price
several of
which defaults
on
the the database quality.
represented
were to
charge investors
as
the used
estimates
the
increased or For
may
between of Product the
the
make
services
export or their risky—causing between
Crisis increases though more)
the
important
reference
was
example,
to
regarded
rates
relatively other effects
funds first to have
as
4.0% Rates (see
, fees, services
depositors
interest world—countries NIPA an provide pay
Affected
a reflected engaged
price Accounts
or
impact
the
for
and cost it that only
depressed adjustment
loans Kyle
that
charges
from these
their
(that for services moving recommends that charged contributed table
the
in global interest
as new
quickly. a
index
declined of banks
2.2%
the K. they rates
services
the reference
12
that
safe,
defaulted. the was
fees
their
is,
United
1.8.6,
production
Measures two in 10 and on Hood, ,”
features provision
that
loans
in
United a
situation indirectly (see to
lend
Survey
third on
the were to provide an
consumer
do
“flight such rates rate to different interest
to
Bureau the
during fall. loans
were
to increase
to
“
States not borrowers
SNA Figure
such their
than
Measuring whose that
quarter
interest
securitized, and their
import
as consumer
States,
Nonperforming of of of of
In
to fully of in
are
required balance
increased
of Treasury
of
interest Current measured” as they the FISIM terms
rates the Financial
the
the quality,”
indicate
the services directions.
spending
5).
customers Economic OECD
payments China,
in paid cover
of global price
average
the rate. financial
rate Over SNA.
be the based
to
calculations 2007 the of
inflation
sheets
for
Business,
recorded is price countries the to rise—and
securities
loans the the paid
India, that relative
index) and
Services withdrawing
the Consequently, another source Services
economy.
on offset indirectly Analysis
(FISIM)
to on
In
rate
of that national
cost loans crisis,
index is same
the to other
the as the
and
the interest
and
known and fell
depositors
of
a the
are
to 93, as of
value
and
third
to
moving case or
of differences do revaluation. website.
describes other
though for
interest period, Indonesia—
from value goods the
the memorandum to
For
by
no. remove increased not government Commercial
accounts
not the
funds
private
as
of or
quarter (in charging reference
services
countries
2, the invoiced financial
100.0
of of FISIM.
appear the
outlook
their and
current the
the
that
those
funds,
US how from the
to
of
a
‐
03/06/14 11:38 13 12 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 13
Invited Paper negative future, services Overhang 2009 08 points countries household the ultimately and by disposable and globally. the financial Saving, income, Recession and saving, United recession interest relationships sheets ,”
4
“housing measures
Brookings helped on balance ,” percentage
IMF in
and Kingdom. the
net balance
net
11 10 In
The
by
and but
Figure crisis household the
Holding
that
has For For
are the
Economic
dropped
debt. income
household economists lending
economic delay
lending
effects
also
increased
sheets United
bubble”
between example, example,
Papers
led
of apparent United and
export 4.
sheets.
points production
Back For
in GDP Denmark to some
the
in
or the
of Review,
sharply
or
net renewed on States example,
the Consumption activity. in commodities,
Kingdom
from borrowing,
the
see see saving
Great
borrowing,
balance
the Economic in
effects
in The
of current not saving
United
the
Denmark, Atif James global the
costs
and (to
51, 2001
in
only and
rates
11
Mian
the
adverse by 6.4%),
no. on in
prices, and Ireland,
D.
Activity of in
States
to
2007.
2007
?” fourth
1
Hamilton
in and
manufacturing
the 2006
(April):
the and Brookings
these by national
impacts Amir
net
United and which (Spring):
increase
By
nearly by Source:
quarter was
74–116;
2005
saving
2009, countries (2009), 12 Sufi even
currency, associated
Papers Figure
also
percentage
States,
of
6 Q1 OECD
(2010), 215–261.
in
as percentage
illustrating negative,
the of
–
“ and and experienced
commodity 13 Causes 2013 the
5. households national on
had 11
financial
expenditure
the
Karen GDP for “ other
Economic effects Household
Q3
with
increased—by
United
rapid and
points
deflator –3.7%
accounts
E.
the points activities.
lower
Consequences 2006 Dynan
crisis, of
prices
real growth
and major States Activity
in
deflator, the of Leverage
Q1 and National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService
data
in Ireland.
household estate
net (2012), NPISH though
Great – boosted
the
10
and private change 2010
from in
(Spring):
disposable more On Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014
United real
United
Euro and bubbles,
was
Q3 “ Recession of
Stat The the commodity Is
final
the
estate their than a the
in
saving
area
Extracts
other 3.2%
299–344. Household increase States
prospects
Kingdom
Oil consumption Recession
income, 3 terms countries also
Shock
prices of percentage
and hand,
extended
database.
net The Accounts ofSociety prices exhibited
in
Eurostat Conference
of growth Debt of (to
for
of
during in
for
trade 2007–
2007– 2.3%),
the
the
in
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 14
Invited Paper household borrowing the final Germany In reflected associated United 167.9 the trends, notable
Source: the
boom Great
expenditures
from United
States while
These
The During impact
OECD
Figure
on or
Recessions in
increased) net
with 2007
notable Italy, real the
those Kingdom,
fell national
effects
saving
the
from 6.
countries
household
estate
to
from Debt and
for
Great
of 2009
increase
the
accounts
the was
on for these increases
France
of 142.8
household prices.
net recession. households almost (See Recession, household
that reflected
balance countries.
saving
data to in and
Figure
had There
saving 133.3. of
all
from
Italy
only debt experienced
OECD
were in
sheet as the
debt
6).
was
Stat
weakness
a in This continued
about
as percentage Over net
the
less Extracts
ratios countries. essentially as a
downturn
lending
percentage deleveraging—that United
2001 pronounced the one
the
of database. in
same their
–
percentage
Japan the of
2012
real
14 of
Of Kingdom
no 12
net in
general household upward course, period,
increase estate household
of
and disposable
in
net
countries Germany
and point
disposable government bubble. trends, the there
is, in
consumption the
household income, as debt, the
in were
reductions United
Japan
that
with continued As household
however,
shown income
many
selected
had decreased little
and
States
debt
component not
recession evidence
France. in in
their
fell saving
countries was
ratio
household Figure participated was
from
(or downward primarily
also in rate
net ‐related of
6,
the 179.8
of
during a
in
GDP
debt.
in
to
03/06/14 11:38 15 14 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 15
Invited Paper economic a increases such Reinvestment programs increased
number
Source: as the
in in by of factors
OECD
reduction
expenditures various
countries 9
Act
percentage
national
that of Figure
OECD 2009
in
would undertook
accounts
tax
7.
for
in countries.
points Debt
receipts
the
have various
data
of
United
(from expansionary
general automatically
from
as
social From
economic
3.6% Stat States
government
benefits, 2007 Extracts
to
and
fiscal 12.7%) 2001
contributed
to activity
database. various
2009,
– such
13 programs, 15 as
2012
in
a
and percentage the as net
car
unemployment to
incomes United borrowing
scrappage
this such
decrease of
National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService States, as
declined GDP, the
as
(“cash
Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014 a G7 American
by insurance.
percentage in
countries
8
and the for
percentage
clunkers”) fiscal the
Recovery
Furthermore, automatic
of balance, The Accounts ofSociety
GDP Eurostat Conference
points
and
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 16
Invited Paper in Euro the Figure were 75.8% should other for comparisons the
showing debt respect conventions) levels Netting between This “story” give shown reflects government Consolidation not counted convention that example, Japan, case, the the debt), may those financial
area.
quite
countries
United to
7). be
Along net bonds. allow
of is the if 105.0%), change In
this
emphasized
in of
one but
where large—for which
by general
of debt, changes
to total Public Figure assets
Generally,
some same
favor of debt in
assets Kingdom,
8%
government
borrowing with good
Figure the
the consolidation
unit the Most
public also is
the without
in
liabilities
does
to as the
widely are
and debt
of message. OECD cases,
debt
7 the
overall
government 2002 of
international
owned
had
measure the
relative in shows
7. monitoring common
convention
example,
systematically
debt—see the
that
the
reduction not
the debt by Thus, increasing
as government
increases
also
increases to implemented the taking
government
6
UK
public may a
of public transmit
the
by
gross 17%
percentage
over But percentage
level is
increases
publishes in general the
ratio
the
figures
ensured
data from issue
terms
into as
Figure
in
gross
the Measuring in comparability. debt. time, chosen
debt debt. numerator
of general
more in
the a 2012).
increased
net
consolidated
shown
public account overestimated percentage the 2007 box,
bonds has
government
of
of
debt
gross of
owes in
Indeed, and may 7 This a
lending
for
points
(continued
than
of
public
debt
changes can an can figure
the the “Measuring
government.
to
GDP
other
debt
in
Figure
on and means
not
asset
and
debt,
debt of
2009 also
the general dramatically general GDP 25 Figure ratio
in
the
debt this
(or this of is
be
Figure those
between percentage
of
Comparing assets
countries, Japan, figures
in
be
(the a to
net during 7
as but
the financial
increase appropriate it
GDP of
debt
on headline ratio. in 16
debt shows
are
7 another
used
14 reflects reported
government government
10 and
debt,
Figure in one for
loan US next 7
This that increased and
gross
, is
to is favor percentage
the
All all
debt ratio countries. to change
Comparing
could internal one
consolidated
the to page)
it in which
markets
reduces
points by the
measurement Public of compare indicator. 7 all
recent unit
is
ones the net
in of
compared
of increased of
OECD. them more for not
the
government
consider OECD
monitoring
general
of
them the banks) is borrowing), debt in is
making to
(from
Debt (in
the
liabilities
shown period,
the Economists equal in
almost the points
will
than
picture. the Public
Thus debt
particular
But order
statistical ratio case despite
government, debt
level
which more
29 47.0% to government, government. that
4 to
international
there
conventions levels consolidated
while
or
similarly all
other
percentage percentage Debt.”
for
during
net
to may the owed
for
of
Some more.
from it
OECD
or
the is lend
to
Japan,
are
does public
debt.
the
are all gross databases.
between comparability
the less dispose
countries 72.1%).
by fact
the
2007 countries,
split
conventions
to Maastricht However, many to
countries,
this counterpart
not show the
debt for
though debt, This
banks.
what recession
that will . points points
between This
to
increase is
of.
general
which countries. ways
Many
not tend
the 2009 minus (by
it
and is
For
means
In
except
valid in it (from
(see with same
(i.e.
this do
to the
of all
03/06/14 11:38 17 16 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 17
Invited Paper 3. again, the the economic For enough. Coverage Source: (2) (1) (4) all Maastricht (3) liabilities Member are or liabilities comparability loans of this at (payables) 2012, Maastricht theory France, fraught countries, secondary value Outlook level Canada debt
example, 4½ OECD
Slow
“nominal” the Gross Gross Net Maastricht Canada, gross
included
amount. but
level of
years
(F4),
for
After In debt and
future
Estimate
in
economic
debt total debt Germany, with
appears Figure In The
in
downturns does in many liabilities
States,
in: of public national of
excluding changes 20% the aggregate which
markets).
in pension most
from national debt
convention
the
reaching
debt excluding liabilities government table
debt currency
non are for This
addition pensions value
not
of by EU, European
7
in Euro
debt
(line
countries uses a much uses shows the OECD only ‐comparability this
are
instruments
the
publish
is recovery below of
Italy, sample accounts, the pension
dramatically (which
liabilities 2012, due (Figure
a
accounts
pension
2
trough area
the a not However,
increased
measure in
a also F2
USA. very
and – for
to
Stability Table
trough better
of Measuring
F8; convention the
their Japan
to
(currency general USA in gives
the countries, employees. recorded
its
liabilities
the
experienced
7)
of deposits a
at
the substantial means percentage
the
In liabilities
widest
of valuation B.
employees. face
at and three exclusion (F6),
national
terms
data
when include
in
and
Effects an
growth is
the
sovereign
and “market only 9.0%,
as
Canada depending value) the problematic, government
(line indication
including
and
and UK, Great
in corresponding
convention and it countries.
(line which (F2),
Growth
the
using of
few
first
of
includes of
the In 1
2 or an
accounts. of
amount,
was
payables
even level GDP
a of Comparing
–
deposits), 1 Different
recovery non
value”
at bonds
countries
financial gradual In debt
– estimate Recession
half national debt
F6
more is F6)
slow an
EU
on ‐European interest Pact,
even of on though (pension
of As
these as at
average
essentially
crisis countries,
debt,
for the
(bonds
(F3, the
representing
comparable
(F8, assets) 2009, and
Conventions
can so recorded
recovery
from
a
more
F3
to accounts. 17
of
measuring
apply
convention Public ‐called
cornerstone impact
through
which 15 amounts
there
and accrued
formerly erratic the be (bonds) Figure the
liabilities)
the the annual are OECD
restrictive. seen,
the convention
thoroughly
obligation
the because
Debt
are “face” constitute over advanced in Great revalued of 122.5 102.1
94.2 80.0 USA 7,
(see
the
on
data. related
but
the
and around countries,
national for
these public F7 the such as rate
used.
(continued) Level the
of
third
already
the in it Recession national
not Canada value,
F4
order National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService
In
of
the is
of The
SNA pension first
of differing
as
debt.
banking
(loans). the final used
of economies fact, In paid) considered 14%
the the 1.9%.
quarter
Canada
accounts the
109.7 fiscal
if Debt 72.9 96.1 43.6
financial
particular,
while such
1993 of two
Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014
discussed valuation
they recording
and core
column
accounts. OECD’s of in
It government ranking or
was
obligations
reflects monitoring
Figure
years GDP This
conventions crisis ). as
even, USA,
other were of of
The
the do
interrupted
began instruments 2013,
not public
excludes
France in of Economic 109.3 109.3
90.2 70.3
the
at after in above.
in
but not
of international 7 which exchanged USA,
Canada valuations This
Table the
comparable the market is terms
pension
situation
real not
include
growing in therefore The Accounts ofSociety debt), in
the
of total
covers Euro Australia
Eurostat Conference
terms on
these The is
1). F8
EU for GDP
of
trough, in the by
the that
of Over
area.
are on
of of
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 18
Invited Paper first another downturn, and first 2009 consumption 2009 countries; in most uninterrupted center not grew Recession, general the contract expenditure increased a growth, quarter only decreased quarter growth the capital gross in United GDP 4.9%. first began increased decrease increased
2.7% several 2011–2012
world, trough
fall
its
quarter quarter three 4.6% began
through trough during OECD fixed As
declining of
annual real
formation Kingdom,
into rate,
Aggregate At In government of of In
with
recession, as of
(in the
countries
28.7% 11.2% at (a
quarters
terms
North within
2013. 2013, with the 7.0%
a Poland’s
in capital
GDP many to the countries.
the
the of of was 1.0% the drop
through a
over
its Euro
2009
expenditure
the
and decline rate. 3.8%
growth other
2013, 2008,
fourth
an
trap
real in by
first had first
Portugal’s a from of since America,
only
which the
countries increased
fourth
the of
annual
formation overall
5.8%
the
area averages, estimated
with through
the
GDP of
The annual continued
GDP
GDP 2.4% of
end increased
debt. four quarter Euro Euro when the
same 2.4%
in 2012. the Contrary quarter of the second
first anti
crisis,
is average largest GDP
final
the
quarter
grew 21.8%, of
fourth
rate), growing
quarters
modest
not
over trough grew, the 2009 area, area By
‐globalization
rate. above GDP
GDP began quarter the
the
span. only Overall,
third
however,
for was
of
expenditures,
25% the
has,
part
quarter recovery
of 14.2%,
to
4.0%
the
economy
and GDP
fourth to spectrum
2011).
trough,
there quarter
began a for
the In annual
but
6.3%, of
2013,
deleverage.
of unusually
third
quarter
In
growth 4.0% its
10.5%,
decrease what to
unfortunately,
of of Northeast
first
2013.
of
the GDP
the contrast Euro resumed by
more Japan’s
level institute the the
a
have
of
2013.
quarter
Canada’s hide
a
quarter
declining
Italy’s
the
annual proceeded 2.8% two
OECD growth a happened recession
of
1.4%
of 2011
Euro
of policies. recovery,
a area 2.4% within
Korea, since of
at
slowly
2013,
2.1%
third
the been
growth weak. a the in
quarters
2011, GDP
Rather the
annual
to
great
Asia, General real gradual
austerity countries
annual real
area, and
decreasing of
rate. of annual
Netherlands the rate Euro most
GDP
Europe, again
annual
quarter trough on
Spain’s large
2013, than grew
experienced
2013, For in
GDP
Since
after and
GDP
fell
Japan’s 18 at but
2009 deal
in
than
the also (see
rate, the
area, of
increased
16
economic rate, a
exports the
growth.
government GDP
rate, 3.3% in differences
9.9% by was
after slow,
measures
Portugal’s
between 2011,
other general was the the of
rate.
of
first
experienced GDP of trough over the recovering Figure
and OECD the 1.5%
Germany, the and variation
GDP
(7.6%,
2011. 2.0%
and
2009 depression by
grew
at (a
the
quarter fourth
but
On
had
third hand, and was 19
the
the
Great
2.0% the its
remained
over at
recoveries, experienced 3). government
countries experienced of
second the
below relatively the quarters
trough
Then in
only
pre decreased Slovak real a a
largest another
the between
6.3% second final Imports
quarter
quarter 2.5% 1.6% response experienced
in from annual
the other Recession.
last also of ‐recession a
main GDP 2.0% the
much downturn
of 2009 its
consumption quarter (a
next
in
Republic’s
quarter
7.0% annual annual
experienced
continuous the in
1929, from
quarter 2009 experiences
1.5%
decline hand, steady
GDP,
however,
decreased
of increased
rate)
countries. driver of
(a
aggregate,
two final 2.3%.
only
through
six of
Great to
2013
2010 0.4% below
the
Europe peak.
trough.
annual policy of the
quarters.
rate, real rate) relatively France’s periods from of
consumption for one pace.
of
of of
2010
end
it GDP 2007 Recession,
annual and expansion
recovery
gross
1.3%
three 2013. the recession its
had
expenditure 22.8%,
the
and
Private as
quarter 2.8%. relatively Greece, its
makers
of
real rate). entered
of US
level had it
grew Spain’s
consumers
of recovery
and
trough
third various decreased
GDP
After Mexico’s
began the
over
fixed quarters GDP
rate). From
exports
Italy’s a
in final the
13.4%,
in
of
Great
did 4.7% at
grew
from in
in
the
the the GDP
solid
in
to the the The last
in
03/06/14 11:38 19 18 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 19
Invited Paper The revaluation Information Analysis construction estate constrained increases, during the percentage household to assets value prices subsequent points was apparent, 4. countries nonfinancial central us Recession recommended question approach], has failures seen macroeconomic the by 2006,
2011. with households
increase. US weaknesses Prelude increase also
in
of
real
are
dropping in prices,
the
integrated
bank Figure an website.
in
Government 13 12 Although We’ve The
household
The the the of
that
See Source:
as also
identifying and government
estate
account
recovery. leverage
flow
Gaps
of due some
crash
real
the
to
balance case governors, US increase United also primarily
The IMF though
GDP
8. experienced
the apparent, seen increased the “a
,”
recovery 27.4% households to of
in accounts, estate
From
Integrated assets
effects contributed in staff in Report interest, strategy in
subsequent
the funds, rising
financial increased of real
is principle, that
Ireland Kingdom real
Despite
sheets debt
the housing
the in
also and
reflected
2001 availability from
debt
bubble
estate owned
the
to estate the real
of
67.6%. with
critical in and
imbalances
the
and
to as as
the
macroeconomic a
the
and
government IMF
for to became 2006
crisis continued
national
austerity
real
promote
in analysts
to Financial sectoral the to
the
G deficit
slow
that
many 12
all ‐
Spain, staff 8 imbalances. 20
estate
national of percentage of
finance
affected recovery.
some net
the Source: S.3.a, and were accounts
that Figure countries.
have
Stability measures data
the two to
bubble, borrowers receipts.
G7
rise Financial
led from accounts compilation
sectoral ministers accounts
perhaps other
more noted
8.
Integrated
the countries
To in to Real points Board
Bureau provide
In many
United in that the
what countries
generally.”
From
that
estate
a 19 practice
of and Stability
and
during the
Secretariat should
2009 global
in
of 17 included macroeconomic the
OECD by extent the
and
us Economic Canada central other mostly
2009 States
assets
United
amounts
with
report national the
financial strongly
dissemination be we Board
13 countries
to financial do
bank cuts
able
was (2009), years of
hotly are a
2001 (see
Analysis States 2012,
the statistical to households
National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService Secretariat
limited accounts ranging visible in
governors
to accounts
the affected –
Figure
crisis? of national debated
, 2012
social “
tell
general
table The economic
as website.
the G Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014 ‐20
slow
similar in
of
Financial
by
of account This 7). real from S.3.a,
benefits
and
the
the by the
had
(October finance
the accounts
economic
concluded,
government economic
estate turns
a
United NPISH, balance
[balance
29
databases.”
stories Bureau both lack housing
Crisis
of percentage
and
ministers
out
29).
of
the States, boom.
successes United also
The Accounts ofSociety
policy
of and
for
complete sheets
tax growth
to
“The sheet Eurostat Conference bubble.
Great Economic
debt
provide
all
be table
It This States
issues
of
and crisis
a
of
as
and the
a
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 20
Invited Paper refinancing constructed identified found How of purchases. identifying macroeconomic effectiveness and Papers contributor Current they sector, and imbalances interesting bubble. refinancing than April was aggregate to reduce many sources, bubble. capital 2002 “ of effect leveraged boosted another of household The which Financial
National mortgage income the
Commission
Jonathan borrowing
relatively
Should 22–12, also
the
through
mortgages
was that is financial
&
formation Business, primarily their
In 15 14
The
measure shown This Proceedings, the they
previous Statistics
found
See See
the or 2009, home
and
Accounts
not
sector’s the macroeconomic
However, critique
They 2010. often
can in
to
inability dwellings, denominator
saving. borrowers otherwise
ratio
of Michael Takashi were Parker increased 2006,
the small.
the
apparent of
SNA
of
crisis.
for
thus that
93,
the Change
accounts Michael
loan with
on
were
consumption
allows (the of the
for years one, moved high
the aware net for no. of
data
the US
The as
growth
From
the 99, be of wrote
Yamashita ‐
the
in 14 G.
household
mortgages, to
the
denominator
the
4
initiated
cash this
?”
United with
incurrence levels the integrated
While under
to used the
leading
Palumbo
‐value
no. Measurement
leverage
in (April), unusually the rise
United correctly
Palumbo
paper
above in United that of
other volatility
the
ratio
national ‐out 2, an
United
in the
homeowner
in this
to
of 80–86;
they
financial
States
leverage
ratio home
(2013), that 12–26. the
States presented
with fund up
difference
mortgage household
would
and 1.0
States: aggregate
of high
States
in
are
of accounts
in and
Jonathan
little
household loan in mortgage
and
“ real
the
2001 of A
duress indicate Does level Source: S.3.a, Figure Figure consistent can
Matthew
Guide
at
to Economic
the ‐to fixed much
down
re estate ratio)
reflecting
consumption
Fifth ratio. be
take
and ‐value from
‐financing It of
Crisis:
A. to 9.
Integrated
has 9. Presage capital to
constructed
this
debt
Parker
the Ratio mortgage
consumption payment ECB 15 identify
grew remained
cash Bureau
the prices. J. However,
led If
with What
ratio Eichner,
20 ratio Performance
typical
Conference mortgage
to Integrated
a formation, of 18
out to the
(2009), rapidly cash
allowed
of gross macroeconomic the net
Did because It subsets
efforts was
and
Economic and Financial
(that debt
peaked
above
mortgage Donald incurrence
from
more payment as They
residential “
indicative low
during expenditures extremely
The
Takashi debt
Macroeconomic
on is,
households consumers is to
1998 of
the Get
rising and
aggregated
1.4 incurred levels
Analysis Integrated L. refinance
Central Crisis in develop
households
was Kohn,
Right,
the 2003, flow – accounts share during to of Social
2007 Yamashita
?”
real
of
mortgages of the
incurred fixed
last high
website.
Bank
American
data, and
the
and saving What
through
to as
data of
estate
and
homeowner). Progress with Financial
the
years of
national
leverage,
increase gross
Michael capital
financing Accounts high Statistics, NPISH,
the that
the
was Did real on a
to during
pointed
to
United
prices
Economic of
larger
level
refinancing, ratio
the
residential They purchase
were
regarded residential
estate and
formation, United
recommended the G.
accounts ,” spending
but distribution Frankfurt,
of
Palumbo,
States, of the
Survey Miss, Real of
greatly
real mortgage
highly
out, Cash new
exposure
the this
bubble
States Review: housing
System
estate newly
and
as table
gross fixed ‐out of
home data. and
and
a
of
03/06/14 11:38 21 20 INVITED PAPER concopMOULTON 2.indd 21
Invited Paper obligations, aggregation such the giving corporations aggregate importance see Measurement formed as enterprises bubbles, Intermediation, high institutions factors accounts borrowers increases pension increase fared November other the through that the such useful information recommendations monitoring important the to
summarized conduct
IMF data national national the
developed leverage as as
poorly countries
more for
that
investment increased the
an
18 17 16 Another Palumbo To In
and
funds,
its in
gaps including
to
in
See See Joseph identifying
12–13,
SNA conclusion,
risks,
Expert prior some
balance research ability
of
G and such
of they some identify leverage, prominence
across will the accounting accounts.
did
made ‐20 of
Charles Palumbo institutions initiative
institution and
securitization
financial
and
by
Economic during
that
to
which
to
probably Financial not
E. set 2010.
as data extent, saw
and
Group
exposure
of to
the
the the the to Stiglitz, the
asset it insurance sheet banks, Fannie
the of experience on fared which
disaggregate
Hulten,
a
difficult
better
as Parker
balance Real
gaps
18
although and current
United real the
implies Great imbalances number
of
developing
account
framework financial
critical
the on to classes Performance and
leverage with
Stability always
the Amartya
Parker
Economy, relatively
broker/dealers, 2000s
Mae
economy. carried initiative
the
of Disparities
Michael
monitor
issue resulted were
Recession.
asset to
companies, IMF
States,
sheet and the that other
distribution in of
the
and large
identify did
and (2009), prior sector’s face
the
the into of
and Sen,
financial also Board ‐specific financial
that during much
macroeconomic
improved
national
should NBER
Palumbo,
not
well, Freddie complexity,
and
institutions excessive
17 risk balance
Spain,
and
in
swings spreading the most
the to and smaller
in critical In
has
p.
exposures
distinguish We
the
other
more
in
and Book Social
the
National particular, “rise such the the criticism 80.
Financial Jean
and,
lead
sector
risks. their received accounts.
of important
and
should
high accounts Mac.
in and
financial sheet share measures
financial
credit
of income,
Series,
subsectors ‐ as aggregation
in risk efforts Progress
the Paul
in to
of Ireland,
maturity that
report the Marshall The exposure levels
Poland,
Because
to
the
Accounts. improved
to the that
21
than current
data. information. different also
Fitoussi
statistics Stability
boom.
they considerable capability
real
Studies
19 measurement carry mortgage
For
were United
to crisis
imbalances. real sector consumption, .”
the of to of
note, traditional
the
add
Second, estate
noted Reinsdorf were
several mismatch,
and leverage
risk the
the
very to
estate
or (2009), is process not and
in 16 countries Board
performance
types
will distributional however, already
States, as the
financial
financial Income G and
This
financial of
net
able debt ‐20 little that price
the a Nevertheless,
never countries
the housing aggregation
market whole attention
“
National Accounts at the Service of Economic and Monetary Policy Making National Accounts ofEconomic andMonetary at theService
integrating (forthcoming),
Furthermore, of borrowers includes was
Report corporate of
finance of community, Great
to
two
and government that
leverage, and addressed
bonds US and shocks.
certain became aggregation
account capture
instruments.
fully also corporations that
showed integrated Luxembourg, Alvisse Parc Hotel -12‐13June2014
counterparty factors
Wealth,
couldn’t wealth,
shocks
by market Recession, in
and that
ministers
several is
a and
substitute some the the
First,
financial
bonds. recommendation the during of
that
such significant
aggregated
all balances, risk
experienced
Commission
within
Wealth, collateralized however, made
future. financial continuing to
‐sponsored only conference
and
as external
of be
countries hides information the
information concrete financial macroeconomic as
well Furthermore,
the The sector that they
identified on the
a
institutions,
mutual risk it SNA’s for the modest
The Accounts ofSociety
Financial
data
or difficult imbalances
as
growing
and net Eurostat Conference
period. OECD
‐ were
the continues balances,
SNA taking,”
disguises
on mixes held
work
that
housing
gaps. that
funds, debt the
with
from by
very has to
to
03/06/14 11:38 INVITED PAPER con cop MOULTON 2.indd 22 03/06/14 11:38