DOCSLIB.ORG

T Ftc 1.' 9°C9°C Amhara Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI) Gondar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T Ftc 1.' 9°C9°C Amhara Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI) Gondar T ftC 1. ' 9°C9°C Amhara Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI) Dj AGRICULTURAL Q GROWTH Gondar Agricultural Research Center 9 program Participatory Agricultural Production Systems Analysis of AGP-Ii Districts in North Gondar Zone: Implications for Research and Development Published by Research Publication.Cornmunication and Knowledge Management Directorate, ARARI A Participatory Agricultural Production Systems Analysis of AGP-I1 Districts in North Gondar Zone: Implications for Research and Development Research Report: 1 Yonas Worku Asmamaw Bidru Solomon Abega/. Muuz G/tsadiq Alayu Kidanc Ertiban WonditVaw Tikunesh Zelalem Landuber W ondale i th ru * m c < r rcrc M ti-tHt g AGRICULTURAL Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, GROWTH PROGRAM A Participatory Agricultural Production Systems Analysis of AGP-II Districts in North Gondar Zone: Implications for Research and Development ©ARARI, 2018 MPKi 2010 Website: http://www.arari.gov.et Tel: +251-582-206400 Fax: +251-582-2205174P.O.Box: 527 Bahir Dar, Ethiopia Copy Editing and Design: Yonas Worku,Wal!elign Zegeye. Mekonnen Tilahun, Abiro Tigabie, Abiy Legesse and Mulugeta Alemayehu ISBN 9788-99944-927-6-3 Donors and partners ft H I l + l (S) USAID TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................................. vi LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................. viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................................ix 1.INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1 2.METHODOLOGY 2 2.1. Area Description............................................................................................................ 2 2.2. Method of Data Collection and Data Type................................................................. 5 2.3. Analytical Method..........................................................................................................5 3.SURVEY RESULT........................................................................................................... 6 3.1. Socio-Economic Characteristics of the Study Area...................................................6 3.1.1. Fanning system....................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2. Agricultural marketing and market infrastructure.............................................10 3.1.3. Input supply and financial system.......................................................................12 3.1.4. Rural livelihood and household economy..........................................................14 3.1.5. Cross cutting issues...............................................................................................16 3.1.5.1. Nutrition..................................................................................................... 16 3.1.5.2. Gender.........................................................................................................16 3.1.5.3. Climate smart agriculture......................................................................... 18 3.1.6. Major constraints related to socio-economic issues......................................... 22 3.1.6.1. Highland areas................................................................................ 22 3.1.6.2. Mid altitude.....................................................................................23 3.1.6.3. Lowland area.................................................................................. 24 3.1.7. Recommendations and outlines of research and developme nt proposals. ..26 3.2. Crop production...................................................................................................................28 3.2.1. Cropping s y s te m ..............................................................................................28 3.2.2. Crop m anagem ent.............................................................................................30 3.2.3. Harvesting and post harvest handling.........................................................32 3.2.4. Constraints to crop production......................................................................33 3.2.4.1. M ajor ipests..............................................................................................33 3.2.4.2. Technology constraint......................................................................... 37 3.2.4.3. Crop m anagem ent................................................................................. 38 3.2.4.4. C ropping system ....................................................................................38 3.2.2.5 Harvesting and post-harvest handling.............................................39 3.2.5. Prioritized overall production constraint by districts............................. 40 3.2.6. Prioritizing interventions areas of research and development for crop production constraints........................................................................45 3.2.7 Recommendations and outlines of research and development Proposals The following research interventions are suggested to address crop production constraints in different districts:.......................48 3.3. Livestock Production.............................................................................................. 49 3.3.1. Livestock types and breeds............................................................................49 3.3.2. Livestock population and productivity....................................................... 50 3.3.3. Production system and livestock management system ...........................52 3.3.4. Feed resources....................................................................................................52 3.3.5. Feed and feeding management in different season..................................53 3.3.6. W atering and w ater source............................................................................ 53 3.3.7. Animal feeding system by production purpose........................................ 55 3.3.8. Disease and disease management by animal type....................................55 3.3.9. Livestock product Processing................. ......................................................57 3.3.10. Identified Production Constraints in the AGP II districts...................... 57 3.3.10.1. Constraints related to Genotype........................................................ 57 3.3.10.2. Feed and feeding constraints.............................................................. 58 3.3.10.3. Animal Health Constraints in AGP II Districts............................. 59 3.3.10.4. Technology constraints........................................................................59 3.3.10.5. Forage and crop residue management constraints........................59 3.3.11. Livestock production constraint by Districts.............................................60 3.3.12. Prioritizing problems, screening options and interventions.................. 67 3.3.13. Recommendations and outlines of research and development p ro p o sals.............................................................................................................69 iii 3.4. Natural Resource M anagem ent..............................................................................70 3.4.1. Resources............................................................................................................. 72 3.4.1.1. Soil.....................................................................................................................72 3.4.1.2 W ater..................................................................................................................72 3.4.1.3. Irrigation............................................................................................................73 3.4.1.4 Forest land coverage in type........................................................................ 73 3.4.2 Constraints.................................................................................................................... 75 3.4.2.1 Soil Productivity..............................................................................................75 3.4.2.2 Fertilizer Utilization...................................................................................... 76 3.4.2.3 Soil conditions.................................................................................................78 3.2.2.4 Water M anagement constraints by districts............................................ 78 3.4.2.5 Agronomic practices constraints by districts.......................................... 81 3.4.2.6 Rain W ater H arvesting.................................................................................. 81 3.4.3 Forest M anagem ent Constraints by Agro E cology.......................................82 3.4.3.1. Area closure....................................................................................................83 3.4.3.2. Opportunities, Potentials and Constraints..............................................84 3.4.3.3 Summary o f Research Intervention O utlines..........................................91 4. CONCLUSION...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Khat Production on Household Welfare in Amhara Region of Ethiopia
    Impact of khat production on household welfare in Amhara region of Ethiopia by Hanna Lynn Ruder B.S., Kansas State University, 2016 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Agricultural Economics College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2018 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Benjamin Schwab Copyright © Hanna Ruder 2018. Abstract Khat, a lucrative cash crop cultivated in and near the Horn of Africa, is gaining the interest of researchers around the globe. Despite its potential to provide excess income, economic opportunity, and access to technology to those who produce it, the conflicting legal status around the globe causes policy and trade disputes between countries. Research on the impact of khat production on household welfare is sparse. To address this, the purpose of this research is to determine what factors affect the decision to grow khat and subsequently determine the impact of khat production on labor, income, education expenditure, and food security. Data was extracted from a survey conducted in early 2017. A total of 365 households in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia were surveyed. We estimate the factors affecting the decision to grow khat by employing use of two logit models and one linear probability model to calculate marginal effects. We estimate the impact of khat production on labor, income, education expenditure, and food security through propensity score matching. Khat production appears to be adopted by households who are educated and apt to adopt improved technologies. These households are likely to own a donkey, own irrigation, and own more plots than a non-producing household.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Opinion 2017;9(7) 60
    Report and Opinion 2017;9(7) http://www.sciencepub.net/report Community Based Knowledge, Attitude And Practice Of Rabies In Injibara Town And Its Surroundings, Awi Zone, Amhara Regional State, North-Western Ethiopia Yigardush Wassihune1, Melese Yenew1, Ayalew Niguse2 1 College of Veterinary Medicine, Jigjiga University, P.O. Box.1020, Jigjiga, Ethiopia. 2Lecturer at Jigjiga university, College of Veterinary Medicine, Jigjiga University, P.O. Box.1020, Jigjiga, Ethiopia. [email protected] Abstract: Rabies is a viral disease of all warm blooded animals, which causes acute fatal encephalitis, with almost 100% case fatality rate. It is caused by rabies virus (genus Lyssa virus) which is mainly transmitted by rabid animal bites. This disease occurs in more than 150 countries and territories and about 55,000 people die of rabies every year, mostly in developing world despite that it is preventable disease by vaccination. Ethiopia is highly endemic for rabies; yet, a nationwide data on rabies has not been gathered to reveal the actual magnitude of the problem and public awareness levels. With a conviction that a handful of works on public knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) in rabies be done to plan, execute any control and/or eradication programs, this study was conducted in Injibara town and its surroundings from November, 2015 to April, 2016 to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) on rabies and related factors. The design was: ccommunity-based retrospective, quantitative study design to assess the KAP on rabies and related factors. The entire three kebeles of the town and its surrounding rural kebeles were considered in the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumance Cattle Production System in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is It Sustainable?
    WP14_Cover.pdf 2/12/2009 2:21:51 PM www.ipms-ethiopia.org Working Paper No. 14 Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? Azage Tegegne,* Tesfaye Mengistie, Tesfaye Desalew, Worku Teka and Eshete Dejen Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia * Corresponding author: [email protected] Authors’ affiliations Azage Tegegne, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Tesfaye Mengistie, Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Development, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia Tesfaye Desalew, Kutaber woreda Office of Agriculture and Rural Development, Kutaber, South Wello Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia Worku Teka, Research and Development Officer, Metema, Amhara Region, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian Farmers Project, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Eshete Dejen, Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI), P.O. Box 527, Bahir Dar, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia © 2009 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute). All rights reserved. Parts of this publication may be reproduced for non-commercial use provided that such reproduction shall be subject to acknowledgement of ILRI as holder of copyright. Editing, design and layout—ILRI Publications Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Correct citation: Azage Tegegne, Tesfaye Mengistie, Tesfaye Desalew, Worku Teka and Eshete Dejen. 2009. Transhumance cattle production system in North Gondar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: Is it sustainable? IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project.
    [Show full text]
  • F-3: Livelihood Improvement Component
    F-3: Livelihood Improvement Component F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Project Appendix F: Verification Projects F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Projects Table of Contents Page Agricultral Promotion Component ....................................................................................................... F-4-1 Natural Resource Management Component ........................................................................................ F-4-23 Livelihood Improvement Component .................................................................................................. F-4-31 F-4-i Appendix F: Verification Projects F-4: Activity Sheet of the Verification Projects Activity Sheet for JALIMPS Verification Project Agricultural Promotion Component 1: 1. Activity Demonstration/Verification Plot: Primary Crops (15 activities in total) Name 2. Site Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Kobo, Mekedela, Legambo, Aregoba - 2009 meher season: Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Mekedela, Kobo - 2009/10 belg season: Gidan, Mekedela, Legambo - 2010 meher season: Ebinate, Simada, Bugena, Gidan, Kobo 3. Objectives Demonstration/verification of integrated approaches for the improvement of productivity of primary crops & farm land conservation in the watershed. 4. Implementer CRGs under the guidance & supervision of DAs & WAO 5. Beneficiaries CRGs: 34 CRGs formed 34 CRGs x 5 members = 170 members (beneficiaries) 6. Activity Establishment of demonstration/verification plot(s) for the integrated approaches Description for the productivity improvement
    [Show full text]
  • Broad Bed Maker Technology Package Innovations in Ethiopian Farming Systems: an Ex Post Impact Assessment
    ILRI International Livestock Research Institute Research Report 20 Broad bed maker technology package innovations in Ethiopian farming systems: An ex post impact assessment ISBN 92–9146–226–8 Broad bed maker technology package innovations in Ethiopian farming systems: An ex post impact assessment Arlene S Rutherford (PhD) ILRI International Livestock Research Institute INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE i Author’s affiliation Arlene S Rutherford (PhD), Consultant to ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya © 2008 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute). All rights reserved. Parts of this publication may be reproduced for non-commercial use provided that such reproduction shall be subject to acknowledgement of ILRI as holder of copyright. Editing, design and layout—ILRI Publication Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ISBN 92–9146–226–8 Correct citation: Rutherford AS. 2008. Broad bed maker technology package innovations in Ethiopian farming systems: An ex post impact assessment. Research Report 20. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. 89 pp. ii Table of Contents List of Tables iv Acknowledgements v Executive summary vi 1 Introduction 1 2 Methodology 4 3 Results and discussion 6 3.1 National and regional impacts 6 3.2 The policy environment 9 3.3 Farmer survey results 16 3.4 Crop yields and prices with and without the BBM TP: Gross margins (GM) 27 3.5 Welfare with and without the BBM TP: Economic surplus (ES) 28 4 Conclusions and recommendations 31 References 32 Annex 1 Drawings
    [Show full text]
  • English-Full (0.5
    Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Building Climate Resilient Green Economy in Ethiopia Strategy for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations Wubalem Tadesse Alemu Gezahegne Teshome Tesema Bitew Shibabaw Berihun Tefera Habtemariam Kassa Center for International Forestry Research Ethiopia Office Addis Ababa October 2015 Copyright © Center for International Forestry Research, 2015 Cover photo by authors FOREWORD This regional strategy document for scaling up effective forest management practices in Amhara National Regional State, with particular emphasis on smallholder plantations, was produced as one of the outputs of a project entitled “Enhancing the Role of Forestry in Ethiopia’s Climate Resilient Green Economy”, and implemented between September 2013 and August 2015. CIFOR and our ministry actively collaborated in the planning and implementation of the project, which involved over 25 senior experts drawn from Federal ministries, regional bureaus, Federal and regional research institutes, and from Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources and other universities. The senior experts were organised into five teams, which set out to identify effective forest management practices, and enabling conditions for scaling them up, with the aim of significantly enhancing the role of forests in building a climate resilient green economy in Ethiopia. The five forest management practices studied were: the establishment and management of area exclosures; the management of plantation forests; Participatory Forest Management (PFM); agroforestry (AF); and the management of dry forests and woodlands. Each team focused on only one of the five forest management practices, and concentrated its study in one regional state.
    [Show full text]
  • Debre Markos-Gondar Road
    The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ethiopian Roads Authority , / International Development Association # I VoL.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE FIVE Public Disclosure Authorized ROADS SELECTED FOR REHABILITATION AND/OR UPGRADING DEBRE MARKOS-GONDAR ROAD # J + & .~~~~~~~~i-.. v<,,. A.. Public Disclosure Authorized -r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -':. a _- ..: r. -. * .. _, f_ £ *.. "''" Public Disclosure Authorized Final Report October 1997 [rJ PLANCENTERLTD Public Disclosure Authorized FYi Opastinsilta6, FIN-00520HELSINKI, FINLAND * LJ Phone+358 9 15641, Fax+358 9 145 150 EA Report for the Debre Markos-Gondar Road Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................... i ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................... iv GENERALMAP OF THE AREA ........................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................... vi I. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Location of the StudyArea. 1 1.3 Objectiveof the Study. 1 1.4 Approachand Methodologyof the Study. 2 1.5 Contentsof the Report. 3 2. POLICY,LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONALFRAMEWORK ....... 4 2.1 Policy Framework..Framewor 4 2.2 Legal Framework..Framewor 6 2.3 InstitutionalFramework. .Framewor 8 2.4 Resettlement and Compensation .12 2.5 Public Consultation 15 3. DESCRIPTIONOF THE PROPOSEDROAD PROJECT........... 16 4. BASELINEDATA ............. ........................... 18 4.1 Descriptionof the Road.18 4.2 Physical Environment nvironmt. 20 4.2.1 Climate and hydrology ................. 20 4.2.2 Physiography ............ ....... 21 4.2.3 Topography and hydrography ............ 21 4.2.4 Geology ....... ............ 21 4.2.5 Soils and geomorphology ................ 21 4.3 BiologicalEnvironment......................... 22 4.3.1 Land use and land cover .22 4.3.2 Flora .22 4.3.3 Fauna .22 4.4 Human and Social Environent .23 4.4.1 Characteristics of the population living by/alongthe road .....................
    [Show full text]
  • D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 1
    D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 1. Tigrey No. Woredas Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Expected Connecting Point 1 Adwa 13 Per Filed Survey by ETC 2(*) Hawzen 12 3(*) Wukro 7 Per Feasibility Study 4(*) Samre 13 Per Filed Survey by ETC 5 Alamata 10 Total 55 1 Tahtay Adiyabo 8 2 Medebay Zana 10 3 Laelay Mayechew 10 4 Kola Temben 11 5 Abergele 7 Per Filed Survey by ETC 6 Ganta Afeshum 15 7 Atsbi Wenberta 9 8 Enderta 14 9(*) Hintalo Wajirat 16 10 Ofla 15 Total 115 1 Kafta Humer 5 2 Laelay Adiyabo 8 3 Tahtay Koraro 8 4 Asegede Tsimbela 10 5 Tselemti 7 6(**) Welkait 7 7(**) Tsegede 6 8 Mereb Lehe 10 9(*) Enticho 21 10(**) Werie Lehe 16 Per Filed Survey by ETC 11 Tahtay Maychew 8 12(*)(**) Naeder Adet 9 13 Degua temben 9 14 Gulomahda 11 15 Erob 10 16 Saesi Tsaedaemba 14 17 Alage 13 18 Endmehoni 9 19(**) Rayaazebo 12 20 Ahferom 15 Total 208 1/14 Tigrey D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 2. Affar No. Woredas Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Expected Connecting Point 1 Ayisaita 3 2 Dubti 5 Per Filed Survey by ETC 3 Chifra 2 Total 10 1(*) Mile 1 2(*) Elidar 1 3 Koneba 4 4 Berahle 4 Per Filed Survey by ETC 5 Amibara 5 6 Gewane 1 7 Ewa 1 8 Dewele 1 Total 18 1 Ere Bti 1 2 Abala 2 3 Megale 1 4 Dalul 4 5 Afdera 1 6 Awash Fentale 3 7 Dulecha 1 8 Bure Mudaytu 1 Per Filed Survey by ETC 9 Arboba Special Woreda 1 10 Aura 1 11 Teru 1 12 Yalo 1 13 Gulina 1 14 Telalak 1 15 Simurobi 1 Total 21 2/14 Affar D.Table 9.5-1 Number of PCO Planned 3.
    [Show full text]
  • AMHARA Demography and Health
    1 AMHARA Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna January 1, 2021 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 Amhara Suggested citation: Amhara: Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna January 1, 20201 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org Landforms, Climate and Economy Located in northwestern Ethiopia the Amhara Region between 9°20' and 14°20' North latitude and 36° 20' and 40° 20' East longitude the Amhara Region has an estimated land area of about 170000 square kilometers . The region borders Tigray in the North, Afar in the East, Oromiya in the South, Benishangul-Gumiz in the Southwest and the country of Sudan to the west [1]. Amhara is divided into 11 zones, and 140 Weredas (see map at the bottom of this page). There are about 3429 kebeles (the smallest administrative units) [1]. "Decision-making power has recently been decentralized to Weredas and thus the Weredas are responsible for all development activities in their areas." The 11 administrative zones are: North Gonder, South Gonder, West Gojjam, East Gojjam, Awie, Wag Hemra, North Wollo, South Wollo, Oromia, North Shewa and Bahir Dar City special zone. [1] The historic Amhara Region contains much of the highland plateaus above 1500 meters with rugged formations, gorges and valleys, and millions of settlements for Amhara villages surrounded by subsistence farms and grazing fields. In this Region are located, the world- renowned Nile River and its source, Lake Tana, as well as historic sites including Gonder, and Lalibela. "Interspersed on the landscape are higher mountain ranges and cratered cones, the highest of which, at 4,620 meters, is Ras Dashen Terara northeast of Gonder.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopian Journal of Human Rights Articles
    ISSN 2307-6097 Ethiopian Journal of Human Rights (Peer-reviewed) December 2020 Published Once A Year Vol. V Articles Development and Human (In)Dignity: The Impact of Gibe III, Sugar Industrialization and Sedenterization on Minority Agro-Pastoral Groups in South Omo Fana Gebresenbet The Issue of Indigenousness in Ethiopia: A Jurisprudential Dearth Tefera Degu Addis Ethnicity, Women and Governance at Local Level: The Case of the Kebena Community in Ethiopian Federalism Sisay Kinfe The Impact of Large-Scale Development Projects on the Kumpal Agaw Minority Desalegn Amsalu Social Exclusion of Marginalized Minorities in Kaffa, Ethiopia Taddesse Berisso The Qemant Ethnicity: Identity Contestations, Negotiations, and Conflicts Dawit Yosef and Fekadu Adugna A Historical Analysis of Minority Rights in Ethiopia: the Case of Negede Woyto Community Binayew Tamrat Constitutional and Institutional Protection of Minorities in Ethiopia Marew Abebe Salemot Published by the Center for Human Rights School of Law and Governance Studies, Addis Ababa University P. O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia … http://www.aau.edu.et/humanrights/ ISSN 2307-6097 Ethiopian Journal of Human Rights (Peer-reviewed) December 2020 Published Once A Year Vol. V Articles Development and Human (In)Dignity: The Impact of Gibe III, Sugar Industrialization and Sedenterization on Minority Agro-Pastoral Groups in South Omo Fana Gebresenbet The Issue of Indigenousness in Ethiopia: A Jurisprudential Dearth Tefera Degu Addis Ethnicity, Women and Governance at Local Level: The Case of the
    [Show full text]
  • Of Maize Markets in Case of Alefa District Northwestern Ethiopia
    Journal of Marketing and Consumer Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2422-8451 An International Peer-reviewed Journal Vol.70, 2020 Analyze Structure, Conduct, and Performance (SCP) of Maize Markets in Case of Alefa District Northwestern Ethiopia Abera Ayalew 1* Fentahun Tesafa 2 Zewdu Berhanie 2 1.Department of Agricultural Economics, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia 2.Department of Agricultural Economics, Bahir dar University, Bahir dar, Ethiopia Abstract This study examined the major market channels, and evaluate the market margins for key maize marketing channels in Alefa District, Central Gondar Zone of Amhara Regional State. Both primary and secondary data sources for the study were collected. Primary data were collected through personal interviews from a total of 198 producers and 34 traders. Descriptive statistics was employed to describe the socio-economic characteristics of farm households, and to analyze market related data collected from maize traders. The results show that wholesalers and rural assemblers are the most important buyers of maize from producers, accounting for 44 and 36.35% respectively. Market concentration ratio of 74.07% indicates that the maize market in the study area is characterized as oligopolistic. The result of the study also showed that, maize average production and yield were 18.03 quintals per household and 34.37 quintals per hectare, respectively. The major constraints for maize production and marketing of households in the study area include high price of fertilizers, timely availability of improved seeds, large number of unlicensed traders in the markets, climate change (occurrence of drought, pest/diseases), availability of credit access and non-transparent taxation system.
    [Show full text]