DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Studies in the Societal Impact of Spaceflight

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Historical Studies in the Societal Impact of Spaceflight Steven J. Dick Editor Historical Studies in the Societal Impact of Spaceflight Historical Studies in the Societal Impact of Spaceflight Steven J. Dick Editor National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Communications NASA History Program Office Washington, DC 2015 NASA SP-2015-4803 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Historical studies in the societal impact of spaceflight / Steven J. Dick, editor. p. cm. — (Societal impact series ; v. 3) Includes bibliographical references and index. “NASA SP-2015-4803.” 1. Astronautics—Technology transfer—History. 2. Astronautics—Public opinion—History. 3. Astronautics—Social aspects—History. 4. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I. Dick, Steven J. TL865.H58 2010 338.973’06--dc22 2009030014 This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks. v Contents Introduction ..................................vii PART I OPINION Chapter 1. The Impact of Space Exploration on Public Opinions, Attitudes, and Beliefs William Sims Bainbridge .................................1 PART II SPINOFF? Chapter 2. Societal Impact of NASA on Medical Technology William Sims Bainbridge ................................77 Chapter 3. NASA’s Role in the Manufacture of Integrated Circuits Andrew J. Butrica ....................................149 Chapter 4. NASA’s Role in the Development of MEMS (Microelectromechanical Systems) Andrew J. Butrica ....................................251 PART III THE WORLD AT LARGE Chapter 5. Powering Space Exploration: U.S. Space Nuclear Power, Public Perceptions, and Outer Planetary Probes Roger D. Launius ....................................331 Chapter 6. NASA and the Environment: An Evolving Relationship W. Henry Lambright ..................................383 Chapter 7. Societal Impacts of Applications Satellites David J. Whalen .....................................427 vi Historical Studies in the Societal Impact of Spaceflight Chapter 8. Impacts of the Apollo Program on NASA, the Space Community, and Society Eligar Sadeh ........................................491 Chapter 9. An Astrosociological Perspective on the Societal Impact of Spaceflight Jim Pass ...........................................535 About the Authors ............................577 The NASA History Series .......................583 Index ........................................599 vii Introduction ollowing the publication in 2007 of the Societal Impact of Spaceflight Fvolume in the NASA History series, the NASA History Division com- missioned a series of more in-depth studies on specific subjects.1 This volume presents those studies to scholars and the public, and represents what is hoped will be a continuing series in the effort to understand the mutual interaction of space exploration and society—part of a larger need to understand the relationship between science, technology, and society. Emphasizing the importance of public attitudes toward space, the volume opens with sociologist William Sims Bainbridge’s study of the impact of space exploration on public attitudes. Based on seven decades of question- naire survey data, and combining historical and social science approaches, the chapter considers both changes in public opinion over time and key themes that have shaped public opinion. Because the study surveyed vast ranges and quantities of data, it uncovered a number of historical and social science ques- tions that deserve more focused study in the future, integrating historical data and methodologies into statistical analysis of questionnaire survey data. Because NASA has entered a new era of space development, it is ever more important to understand changing public opinion in a historical context. “Spinoff” is the first aspect that comes to mind for most people who think at all about the impact of space exploration, those technologies that are thought—wrongly or rightly—to have emanated from the space pro- gram. Part II consists of case studies of specific potential spinoffs and explic- itly raises the difficult questions of what can be considered spinoff and how much of any particular claimed spinoff can be attributed to NASA—thus the interrogatory “Spinoff?” title for this section rather than the usual declara- tive “Spinoff.” Though NASA claims many spinoffs and publishes an annual 1. Steven J. Dick and Roger D. Launius, eds., Societal Impact of Spaceflight (Washington, DC: NASA SP-2007-4801, 2007), available online at http://history.nasa.gov/sp4801.pdf. viii Historical Studies in the Societal Impact of Spaceflight Spinoff report,2 it seldom parses its claims very finely. The three chapters in this part aim to do just that. Bainbridge’s study of medical technology rein- forces the judgment of social scientists who wrote 30 to 40 years ago that spinoffs are a problematic concept: they may not reflect the most important channels by which NASA contributes to scientific and technological progress, even if they do provide coherent stories to communicate with the general public about the history of space exploration. Andrew J. Butrica tackles the oft-made claim that NASA played a major role in the early development and use of integrated circuits. In particular, he addresses a specific question: What was the role of NASA in improving the manufacture of integrated circuits during the Apollo era? Butrica finds that the answer is not so simple. In a second and related essay, he shows that another claim—that the multibillion-dollar industry known as MEMS (microelectromechanical systems) originated at NASA—was actually such a close collaboration with nearby Stanford University that this story is also much more complex than usually thought. Butrica’s conclusions are also in accord with an earlier finding that even if a particular spinoff can be attrib- uted in whole or in part to NASA, attribution to individuals is still more difficult. As James E. Tomayko found in writing his report onComputers in Spaceflight: The NASA Experience, “often in corporations and government agencies individual achievement is buried within the institution. NASA is no exception. It was exceedingly difficult to get people both in the [A]gency and in contractor organizations to identify who did what, or even to take personal credit where appropriate.”3 This reminds us that, for better or worse, we have come a long way from the lone figure working in a laboratory. Part III encompasses a variety of diverse studies of NASA’s impact on the world at large, ranging from the technology of radioisotope thermal gen- erators and the public controversy over the use of these nuclear components in spacecraft (Roger D. Launius’s chapter), to NASA and the environment (W. Henry Lambright’s chapter), the impact of applications satellites (David J. Whalen’s chapter), and the impact of the Apollo program (Eligar Sadeh’s chapter). At another level, space exploration has spawned new disciplines— ranging from astrobiology and astrochemistry to astrogeology—and has enlarged the boundaries of age-old problems by contemplating such areas as 2. Issues of Spinoffare available at http://spinoff.nasa.gov/index.html(accessed 20 April 2015). 3. James E. Tomayko, Computers in Spaceflight: The NASA Experience, NASA CR-182505 (Washington, DC: NASA Scientific and Technical Information Division, 1988), available at http://history.nasa.gov/computers/Compspace.html, Preface. Introduction ix astrotheology.4 One of the least developed disciplines, but ripe for explora- tion, is astrosociology—the subject of the final chapter (by Jim Pass) in this volume. This section demonstrates that our entry into space has altered the intellectual landscape of the 20th and 21st centuries in ways large and small, broadening our horizons in ways we sometimes fail to recognize. This volume is the third in the NASA History subseries on the societal impact of spaceflight and follows a book entitled Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context.5 That volume makes clear, far beyond the scope of the present work, how much cosmos and culture have become intertwined in the human experience. NASA and other space agencies around the world have contributed much to our understanding of the universe, enriching cul- tural worldviews and revealing the potential for other cultures throughout the universe. Not a bad legacy for 50 years of activity beyond the Earth’s atmosphere. Steven J. Dick Former NASA Chief Historian Washington, DC April 2015 4. On the history of astrobiology—the study of life in the universe—see Steven J. Dick and James E. Strick, The Living Universe: NASA and the Development of Astrobiology (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2004). On astrotheology, see Steven J. Dick, ed., Many Worlds: The New Universe, Extraterrestrial Life, and the Theological Implications (Philadelphia: Templeton Press, 2000). 5. Steven J. Dick and Mark Lupisella, eds., Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context (Washington, DC: NASA SP-2009-4802, 2009), online at http://history. nasa.gov/SP-4802.pdf. Part I Opinion 1 Chapter 1 The Impact of Space Exploration on Public Opinions, Attitudes, and Beliefs William Sims Bainbridge 1. Introduction ince July 1944, when a Gallup poll asked two questions indirectly related Sto the German V-2 rocket program, scores of major questionnaires have included items about space exploration. The end of the Space Shuttle era is a good time to survey the history of public understanding and enthusiasm, because there have
Recommended publications
  • A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model For

    A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model For

    A QUANTITATIVE HUMAN SPACECRAFT DESIGN EVALUATION MODEL FOR ASSESSING CREW ACCOMMODATION AND UTILIZATION by CHRISTINE FANCHIANG B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007 M.S., University of Colorado Boulder, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2017 i This thesis entitled: A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization written by Christine Fanchiang has been approved for the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Dr. David M. Klaus Dr. Jessica J. Marquez Dr. Nisar R. Ahmed Dr. Daniel J. Szafir Dr. Jennifer A. Mindock Dr. James A. Nabity Date: 13 March 2017 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Fanchiang, Christine (Ph.D., Aerospace Engineering Sciences) A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization Thesis directed by Professor David M. Klaus Crew performance, including both accommodation and utilization factors, is an integral part of every human spaceflight mission from commercial space tourism, to the demanding journey to Mars and beyond. Spacecraft were historically built by engineers and technologists trying to adapt the vehicle into cutting edge rocketry with the assumption that the astronauts could be trained and will adapt to the design. By and large, that is still the current state of the art. It is recognized, however, that poor human-machine design integration can lead to catastrophic and deadly mishaps.
  • Asen 5016 Space Life Sciences

    Asen 5016 Space Life Sciences

    January 15, 2019 ASEN 5016 SPACE LIFE SCIENCES Spring 2019 Tues/Thurs 2:0-3:15 pm ECCS 1B28 Instructor: Dr. David Klaus telephone: (303) 492-3525 email: [email protected] This course is intended to familiarize engineering students with factors affecting living organisms (ranging from single cells to humans) in the reduced-gravity and increased radiation environment of space flight, including orbital, lunar and Martian surface conditions. Unique insight will be gained regarding engineering design requirements for spacecraft habitats, life support systems and spacesuits, as well as space biology payloads. Life support needs, as they relate to basic human survival requirements, are covered initially. Next, the lectures turn to more detailed descriptions of the physiological adaptations that occur to people in space, with pertinent background information presented for each topic. Corresponding biomedical countermeasures used to maintain crew health for long duration missions will also be discussed. Finally, the underlying biophysical mechanisms affected by gravity, along with experiment design criteria, will be addressed. Current events within NASA’s research and exploration mission programs and the emerging commercial human space flight sector are reflected throughout the lecture topics. To further elaborate on the lecture material discussed in class, a series of integrated homework tasks provides a practical introduction to the process of journal article publishing and research proposal writing, including the anonymous peer review process used for each. The assignment involves writing a short journal article on an approved topic of your choice, your participation as a peer reviewer for the editor, revising your draft per the review comments you receive back, and resubmitting a final manuscript with a corresponding summary of changes made.
  • The Emergence of Space Law

    The Emergence of Space Law

    THE EMERGENCE OF SPACE LAW Steve Doyle* I. INTRODUCTION Space law exists today as a widely regarded, separate field of jurisprudence; however, it has many overlapping features involving other fields, including international law, contract law, tort law, and administrative law, among others.1 Development of space law concepts began early in the twentieth century and blossomed during the second half of the century into its present state. It is not yet widely taught in law schools, but space law is gradually being accorded more space in law school curricula. Substantial notional law and concepts of space law emerged prior to the first orbiting of a man made satellite named Sputnik in 1957. During the next decade (1958-1967), an intense effort was made to bring law into compliance with the realities of expanding spaceflight activities. During the 1960s, numerous national and international regulatory laws emerged to deal with satellite launches and space radio uses and to ensure greater international awareness and governmental presence in the oversight of ongoing activities in space. Just as gradually developed bodies of maritime law emerged to regulate the operation of global shipping, aeronautical law emerged to regulate the expansion of global civil aviation, and telecommunication law emerged to regulate the global uses of radio and wire communication systems, a new body of law is emerging to regulate the activities of nations in astronautics. We know that new body of law as Space Law. * Stephen E. Doyle is Honorary Director, International Institute of Space Law, Paris. Mr. Doyle worked fifteen years in federal civil service (1966-1981), fifteen years in the aerospace industry (1981-1996), and fifteen years in the power production industry (1996-2012).
  • Nasa Advisory Council Human Exploration and Operations

    Nasa Advisory Council Human Exploration and Operations

    NASA ADVISORY COUNCIL HUMAN EXPLORATION AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE NASA Headquarters Washington, DC January 13-14, 2021 MEETING REPORT _____________________________________________________________ N. Wayne Hale, Chair ____________________________________________________________ Bette Siegel, Executive Secretary Table of Contents Call to Order 3 Commercial Crew Program 5 Public Comments 8 Artemis Program 9 SMD Artemis CLPS Activities 11 Moon to Mars Update 12 Solar System and Beyond 12 HERMES Instrument Update Artemis III SDT Update Advancing Biological and Physical Sciences Through Lunar Exploration 14 SMD Mars Science Update 14 Artemis Accords 15 Planetary Protection Activities 15 Discussion/Findings and Recommendations 16 Appendix A- Attendees Appendix B- HEOC Membership Appendix C- Presentations Appendix D- Agenda Appendix E- Chat Transcript Prepared by Joan M. Zimmermann Zantech IT, Inc. 2 January 13, 2021 Call to order and welcome Dr. Bette Siegel, Executive Secretary of the Human Exploration and Operations Committee (HEOC), called the meeting to order, and provided details of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which provides governance rules for the meeting. She introduced Mr. N. Wayne Hale, Chair of the HEOC. Mr. Hale noted to the public that this particular HEO meeting counts as the last meeting of 2020, and the next scheduled meeting in March/April will be the first meeting of 2021. Mr. Hale welcomed three new members, Ms. Lynn Cline, Mr. David Thompson, and Mr. Kwatsi Alibaruho. The present meeting is focused on an update on the HEO areas, and a joint meeting with the NASA Advisory Council (NAC) Science Committee. Mr. Hale asked if NAC Chair, General Lester Lyles, who was attending the meeting virtually, had any remarks to proffer.
  • The SKYLON Spaceplane

    The SKYLON Spaceplane

    The SKYLON Spaceplane Borg K.⇤ and Matula E.⇤ University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA This report outlines the major technical aspects of the SKYLON spaceplane as a final project for the ASEN 5053 class. The SKYLON spaceplane is designed as a single stage to orbit vehicle capable of lifting 15 mT to LEO from a 5.5 km runway and returning to land at the same location. It is powered by a unique engine design that combines an air- breathing and rocket mode into a single engine. This is achieved through the use of a novel lightweight heat exchanger that has been demonstrated on a reduced scale. The program has received funding from the UK government and ESA to build a full scale prototype of the engine as it’s next step. The project is technically feasible but will need to overcome some manufacturing issues and high start-up costs. This report is not intended for publication or commercial use. Nomenclature SSTO Single Stage To Orbit REL Reaction Engines Ltd UK United Kingdom LEO Low Earth Orbit SABRE Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine SOMA SKYLON Orbital Maneuvering Assembly HOTOL Horizontal Take-O↵and Landing NASP National Aerospace Program GT OW Gross Take-O↵Weight MECO Main Engine Cut-O↵ LACE Liquid Air Cooled Engine RCS Reaction Control System MLI Multi-Layer Insulation mT Tonne I. Introduction The SKYLON spaceplane is a single stage to orbit concept vehicle being developed by Reaction Engines Ltd in the United Kingdom. It is designed to take o↵and land on a runway delivering 15 mT of payload into LEO, in the current D-1 configuration.
  • Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Videncee from an Analog Environment

    Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Videncee from an Analog Environment

    Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research Volume 25 Number 1 JAAER Fall 2015 Article 2 Fall 2015 Human Behavior During Spaceflight - videnceE From an Analog Environment Kenny M. Arnaldi Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Guy Smith Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Jennifer E. Thropp Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, and the Other Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Arnaldi, K. M., Smith, G., & Thropp, J. E. (2015). Human Behavior During Spaceflight - videnceE From an Analog Environment. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/ 10.15394/jaaer.2015.1676 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Arnaldi et al.: Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Evidence From an Analog Environment Introduction Four years after the launch of Sputnik, the world’s first artificial satellite, Yuri Gagarin became the first human to reach space (National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA], 2011a). The United States soon followed on the path of manned space exploration with Project Mercury. Although this program began with suborbital flights, manned spacecraft were subsequently launched into orbit around the Earth (NASA, 2012). With President Kennedy setting the goal of landing a man on the moon, NASA focused on short-duration orbital flights as a stepping-stone to lunar missions.
  • 406 | Tutto Arabi - Veterinary Biorhythm

    406 | Tutto Arabi - Veterinary Biorhythm

    406 | TUTTO ARABI - www.tuttoarabi.com VETERINARY BIORHYTHM by Domenico Bergero, Cynthia Préfontaine Rhythm! • infradian rhythms, which are long-term cycles, such as the To horses, as for men, the passing of time has an impact on annual migration or reproduction cycles found in certain many conscious or automatic activities. When it comes to animals or the human menstrual cycle. men, in particular athletes, we talk about “biorhythm”, i.e. the • ultradian rhythms, which are short cycles, such as the 90-minute effect that longer or shorter cycles can have on performance. REM cycle, the 4-hour nasal cycle, or the 3-hour cycle of But what about our adventure buddy? growth hormone production. They have periods of less than 24 hours. Chronobiology • tidal rhythms, commonly observed in marine life, which follow Chronobiology, from the Greek “chronos” (time) and the (roughly) 12-hour transition from high to low tide “biologia” (study of life), is a field of science that examines and back. periodic (cyclic) phenomena in living organisms and their adaptation to solar and lunar related rhythms. Hormones and physical performance Chronobiological studies include but are not limited to As everyone knows, physical performance is, among other comparative anatomy, physiology, genetics, molecular things, under the control of hormones that determine higher biology and behavior of organisms within biological rhythms or lesser fitness. These hormones can be produced continually mechanics. or, more often than not, can be mero present at certain The variations of the timing and duration of biological times (peak or acrophase) and then decrease. Let’s see which activity in living organisms occur for many essential hormones are involved and what are the best moments for biological processes.
  • PSAD-81-2 Support Service Contracting at Johnson Space

    PSAD-81-2 Support Service Contracting at Johnson Space

    BY THEU.S. GENERAL ACCOUNTli’JG OFFICE Report To The Administrator, National Aeronautics And Space Administration S@pportService Contracting At Johnson Space Center Needs Strengthening T National Aeronautics and S ace Administration Sl about $175 million annual Py on support service Cl at Johnson Space Center. GAO tested the way si of these contracts are administered and found --a contractor was working without approved llllllllllllllll113606 work orders, --Government-furnished equipment was unac- counted for, --questionable reimbursements occurred for con- tractor costs, I --contract funds increased before the need was justified, I --contracting officers were unaware of their re- sponsibilitres and unfamiliar with contract terms, and I --some contracting officers had a general attitude that small dollar value contracts are not worthy of adequate attention. I ‘/A0 believes overreliance on cost-type contracts which quire greater administration efforts than fixed-price )ntracts contributes to these contracting weaknesses recommends that the National Aeronautics and ace Administration take corrective actions. mp81s2 OCTOBER 21,1900 + Request for copies of GAO reports should be sent to: U.S. General Accounting Office Document Handling and Information Services Facility P.O. Box 6015 Gaithersburg, Md. 20760 Telephone (202) 275-6241 The first five copies of individual reports are free of charge. Additional copies of bound audit reports are $3.25 each. Additional copies of unbound report (i.e., letter reports) and most other publications are $1.00 each. There will be a 25% discount on all orders for 100 or more copies mailed to a single address. Sales orders must be prepaid on a cash, check, or money order basis.
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services

    Commercial Orbital Transportation Services

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
  • Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future †

    Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future †

    biosensors Perspective Space Biology Research and Biosensor Technologies: Past, Present, and Future † Ada Kanapskyte 1,2, Elizabeth M. Hawkins 1,3,4, Lauren C. Liddell 5,6, Shilpa R. Bhardwaj 5,7, Diana Gentry 5 and Sergio R. Santa Maria 5,8,* 1 Space Life Sciences Training Program, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (E.M.H.) 2 Biomedical Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 3 KBR Wyle, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 4 Mammoth Biosciences, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA 5 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; [email protected] (L.C.L.); [email protected] (S.R.B.); [email protected] (D.G.) 6 Logyx, LLC, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 7 The Bionetics Corporation, Yorktown, VA 23693, USA 8 COSMIAC Research Institute, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-650-604-1411 † Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Biosensors, 2–17 November 2020; Available online: https://iecb2020.sciforum.net/. Abstract: In light of future missions beyond low Earth orbit (LEO) and the potential establishment of bases on the Moon and Mars, the effects of the deep space environment on biology need to be examined in order to develop protective countermeasures. Although many biological experiments have been performed in space since the 1960s, most have occurred in LEO and for only short periods of time. These LEO missions have studied many biological phenomena in a variety of model organisms, and have utilized a broad range of technologies.
  • Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon 440 Document II-1 Document Title

    Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon 440 Document II-1 Document Title

    440 Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon Document II-1 Document Title: NASA, “ Minutes of Meeting of Research Steering Committee on Manned Space Flight,” 25–26 May 1959. Source: Folder 18675, NASA Historical Reference Collection, History Division, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC. Within less than a year after its creation, NASA began looking at follow-on programs to Project Mercury, the initial human spacefl ight effort. A Research Steering Committee on Manned Space Flight was created in spring 1959; it consisted of top-level representatives of all of the NASA fi eld centers and NASA Headquarters. Harry J. Goett from Ames, but soon to be head of the newly created Goddard Space Flight Center, was named chair of the committee. The fi rst meeting of the committee took place on 25 and 26 May 1959, in Washington. Those in attendance provided an overview of research and thinking related to human spacefl ight at various NASA centers, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and the High Speed Flight Station (HSFS) at Edwards Air Force Base. George Low, then in charge of human spacefl ight at NASA Headquarters, argued for making a lunar landing NASA’s long-term goal. He was backed up by engineer and designer Maxime Faget of the Space Task Group of the Langley Research Center and Bruce Lundin of the Lewis Research Center. After further discussion at its June meeting, the Committee agreed on the lunar landing objective, and by the end of the year a lunar landing was incorporated into NASA’s 10-year plan as the long-range objective of the agency’s human spacefl ight program.
  • Chapter 8 Did America’S Search for a “New Normal” Strike a Balance Between Individual (Freedoms And) Opportunities and National Security in the Postwar Years?

    Chapter 8 Did America’S Search for a “New Normal” Strike a Balance Between Individual (Freedoms And) Opportunities and National Security in the Postwar Years?

    MI OPEN BOOK PROJECT UnitedReconstruction to Today States History Kimberly Eikenberry, Troy Kilgus, Adam Lincoln, Kim Noga, LaRissa Paras, Mark Radcliffe, Dustin Webb, Heather Wolf The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC-BY-NC-SA) license as part of Michigan’s participation in the national #GoOpen movement. This is version 1.4 of this resource, released August 2018 Information on the latest version and updates are available on the project homepage: http://textbooks.wmisd.org/dashboard.html ii Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC BY-NC-SA The Michigan Open Book About the Authors - United States History - Reconstruction - Today Project Kimberly Eikenberry Grand Haven High School Grand Haven Area Public Schools Kim has a B.A. in History and Social Studies and a M.A. in Educational Leadership, both from Project Manager: Dave Johnson, Wexford- Western Michigan University. She has served in many roles during her thirteen years as an Missaukee Intermediate School District educator, including department chair, curriculum director, and administrator. Kim currently teaches World History and Economics at Grand Haven High School. HS US Team Editor: Rebecca Bush, Ottawa Area Intermediate School District Authors Troy Kilgus Kimberly Eikenberry, Grand Haven Public Standish-Sterling Central High School Schools Standish-Sterling Community Schools Troy Kilgus serves as the high school social studies chair at Standish-Sterling Central High Troy Kilgus, Standish-Sterling Schools School. In his eight years of teaching, he has taught various social studies courses includ- ing AP US History and multiple levels of French. Mr. Kilgus earned his undergraduate de- Adam Lincoln, Ithaca Schools gree in French Education and his Masters in Teaching from Saginaw Valley State Univer- sity.