DOCSLIB.ORG

Revision of the Lauraceae I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revision of the Lauraceae I 719 Revision of the Lauraceae I by A.J.G.H. Kostermans (Utrecht). List of abbreviations: Lam. = Herb. Lamarck (Paris) Herbaria M. = Miinchen B = Brussels Ms. = Meissner Herbar. (New York) Br. = Brit. Museum NY. = New York = Bs. = Herbier Boisskr (Geneve) P. Paris C. = Herb. Cosson (Paris) R. = Rio de Janeiro D. = Berlin-Dahlem St. = Stockholm Dr. = U. Herb. Drake (Paris) = Utrecht DC. = Herb. De Candolle (Geneve) W. = Wien Ws. = Dl. — Herb. Delessert (Geneve) Smithsonian Instit. F. = Field Museum (Chicago) (Washington. D. C.) G. = Gottingen Other abbreviations Gr. = Gray Herb. (Cambridge, Ar. = Arowaccan language (Dutch Mass. U.S.A.) Guiana) H. M. G. Mus. B. W. = = Herb. Goeldi Boschwezen (Forestry Bureau) H. R. = Herb. Rio de Car. Caraibic J. Janeiro = language I. = Koloniaal Instituut (Amsterdam) N. E. = Negro English (Dutch Guiana) K. Sar. Saramaccan = Kjobnhavn = language (Dutch Kw. = Kew Guiana) L. = Leiden S. D. = Surinam Dutch The literature and cited in this — if not synonyms, monograph are, men- tioned otherwise, — verified by myself. All specimens mentioned are identified or verified by myself. I wish best thanks the directors of the above mentioned to express my to herbaria for their great assistance. The specimens from Dutch Guiana have not yet been distributed. ACRODICLIDIUM Nees Acrodiclidium Nees, Laur. Disp. Progr. (1833), p. 13; id., Syst. Laur. Gen. (1836), p. 266; Endl., (1837), p. 319, n. 2042; id., Ench. Pl. II (1841), p. 197; Dietrich, Synops. (1840), p. 1332; Phaner. Steudel. Spach, Hist. nat. Véget., X (1841), p. 471; Nomencl. ed. Gen. 2 (1841), p. 21; Meissn., I (1836—43), p. 326, Diet. univ. II, p. 238; Reichb., Nom., p. 71, n. 2668; Orbigny, *) A proposal to retain this name and to reject Licaria has been made by Koslermans I.c. 720 VII Fl. (1846), p. 259; Lindl., Veg. Kgd. (1846), p. 537; Griseb., Brit. W. I. isl. I in Prodr. (1860), p 280; Meissn. D.C., XV, 1 id. in Fl. Bras. 2 Benth. in Benth. (1864), p. 84; V, (1866), p. 172; et Gen. III Hist. II Hook., (1880), p. 154; Baillon, (1870), p. 474;. Nomencl. Index Pfeiffer, (1873), p. 35; Durand, Gen. (1888), Mez in Bot. Gart. Berl. V p. 349, n. 6190; Jahrb. (1889), p. 81; Pax in Pfl. fam. 2 Dalla Torre Engl.-Prantl, III, (1889), p. 123; Gen. Britton and et Harms, (1900—07), p. 178, n. 2819; Wilson, Porto Rico and isl. Dict. Virg. (1924), p. 316; Lemée, I (1929), Benoist in Arch. V in p. 50; Bot. (1931), p. 65; Kosterm. Pulle, Fl. Surin. II — Licaria Guia. (1936), p. 315; Aubl., I (1775), p. 313; Nees, Syst., p. 344; Endl., Gen, p. 320; id., Ench., p. 197; Steudel, Gen. Spach., l.c.; l.c., p. 41; Meissn., II, p. 238; Lindl., Meissn. in l.c.; D.C., l.c., p. 259; Benth., l.c., p. 150; Baillon, l.c., p. 452; Pfeiffer, l.c., p. 107; Durand, l.c., p. 489; Mez, l.c., p. 220;. dalla et Benoist Torre, l.c., p. 177 585; Lemée, l.c., IV, p. 85; Kosterm. in Meded. Bot. Mus. Utrecht l.c., p. 274; 25 (1936), id. in — p. 34; Pulle, l.c., p. 323; Evonymodaphne Nees, Syst., ed p. 244 et 263; Lindl., Syst. 2 (1836), p. 442; Endl., Gen. p. 319;. id., Ench., p. 197; Dietrich, l.c., p. 1332; Spach, l.c.; Steudel, l.c., Gen. id. p. 621; Meissn., I, p. 326; II, p. 238; Rchb., l.c.; Lindl., Meissn. in id. in Fl. l.c., p. 537; D.C., l.c., p. III; Bras., p. 203; Benth., l.c., p. 158; Baillon, l.c., p. 437; Pfeiffer, l.c., p. 1322; dalla — Durand, l.c., p. 349; Mez, l.c., p. 82; Torre, l.c., p. 177; Fl. Tellur. dalla Triplomeia Rafin., (1838), p. 134; Torre, l.c., p. 178; Mez, l.c. Type species: Acrodiclidium brasiliense Nees. Trees or shrubs in tropical South America and the West Indies.. alternate chartaceous Leaves or opposite, or coriaceous, penniner- ved, usually thickened, along the margin. Panicles or rarely pseudo- and few- racemes axillary sub-terminal, to many-flowered, pro- ducing only few fruit. Flowers hermaphrodite. Involucre wanting. Flower tube small Petals usually distinct, sometimes or wanting. 6, usually nearly equal. The 2 outer rows of stamens transferred into of small, rarely petalous staminodes, rarely abortive. Third row filaments slender stamens fertile, or as broad as anthers, distinct or wanting; base provided outside with 2 glands, rarely glands wanting; anthers 2-celIed, cells introrse, extrorse or extrorse-apically; valves dehiscent from base Fourth of as a rule to top. row stamens usually wanting, rarely staminodial. Ovary ellipsoid, glabrous or sericeous, immersed in the tube, style slender, stigma minute. Fruit at first included in the enlarged tube, at last exserted, base sur- 721 thick- and rounded by the simple- and thinly margined, or double-, rarely triple margined cupule. Cotyledons flat-convex, including and conical radicle. the minute, 2 —4-leaved plumule characterised the 6 staminodes and the fertile inner This genus, by outer 3 ones with basal glands and 2-celled anthers, links Huherodaphne and Phyl- lostemonodaphne with Misanteca and Meiilaurus. Key to the species: ta. Fourth row of staminodes distinct 2 staminodes b. Fourth row of wanting 3 Flower inside. 2a. Leaves cordate. tube glabrous Outer staminodes with fimbriate Fertile sub-orbicular, tops. stamens glabrous with rather large cells. Staminodes of the fourth row short, A. endlicheriaefolium Kosterm. glabrous 1. b. Leaves with rounded-acute base. Tube sericeouls inside. Outer staminodes large, auricled. Fertile stamens sericeous at base, with auricled anthers, cells minute. Staminodes of the fourth row large, densely sericeous. A. 2. A. macrophyllum C. Smith. Cells of the fertile introrse. and leaves 3a. stamens Ovary glabrous 4 b. Cells extrose. and leaves or sericeous Ovary glabrous .. 9 Leaves reticulate both 4a. distinctly, densely, prominently on sides. 1. in sub-racemes. Flowers 4—7 mm A. Mez j. Puchury-major (Mart.) X b. Flowers — I. in \ A. 3 mm panicles 3 Leaves 8. A. Kosterm. 5 a. opposite rigidum b. Leaves alternating 6 the tube. 6a. Tepals patent, as long as Cells distinct 7 b. shorter than the tube. Cells minute 8 Tepals incurved, .. last tube c. Tepals at reflexed, wanting. Cells large. 9. A. armeniacum (Nees) Mez staminodes Basal the 7a. Outer rectangular. glands as long as sessile Cells A. Mez istamens. large 3. amarum b. Outer staminodes clavate or spathulate. Cells small. Basal half the filaments broad glands as long ais stamens; as as the anthers A. Rob. 4. Camara Schomb. reticulate 8 a. Leaves coriaceous, elliptic, 8—12 cm 1., on both Basal distinct. sides. Panicles 3 —12 cm 1. glands Cupule verrucous, triple-margined, outer one of 6 large lobes. 6. A. Canella (Meissn.) Mez b. Leaves veins incons- rigid-coriaceous, elliptic, 10—14 cm 1., Panicles 1. Basal picuous. 3 cm glands wanting. Cupule 722 smooth with shortly Idbed outer margin. 7. A. cayennense (Meissn.) Mez 9a. Ovary glabrous 10 b. Ovary sericeous 22 toa. Leaves opposite 11 b. Leaves alternate, rarely sub-oppo(site 14 11a. Leaves densely aureo-sericeous beneath 12 b. sericeouls Leaves sparsely, minutely or glabrescent beneath 13 12a. Leaves sericeous beneath. Flowers sulb-globose. Stamens in- cluded. Outer staminodes distinct. Basal glands aS long as filaments. Cells Hub. minute ij. A. aureum b. Leaves sericeous-tomentellous beneath. Flowers cylindrical. Stamens exserted. Outer istaminodes as a rule abortive. Bas il glands minute or wanting. Cells large. 16. A. oppositifolium Nees Leaves 6 —8 — Flowers 13a. rigid-coriaceous, X 1Y2 2 cm. unknown. Cupule thick, 28 mm h., 35 mm diam., warty; margin triple: inner one 1—2 mm h., outer one 8 mm thick, with lobes in double patent, large irregular a row. 8. A. rigidum Kosterm. b. Flowers Leaves chartaceous, 10—13 X 2 —3 cm. narrowly urceolate. Outer staminodes slender, spathulate, 1 mm 1. Stamens exserted. h., Cupule thin, smooth, 7 mm 15 mm diam.; margin simple 14. A. Meissneri Mez c. Leaves thin-chartaceous, 10—12 X 3—4Y2 cm. Flowers Outer staminodes broadly funnel-shaped. ovate or broadly 1. included. elliptic, X mm Stamens Cupule thin, 7 mm h., A. debile Mez 15 mm diam.; margin simple 13. Flowers 14a. 3 mm diam.; tube nearly wanting; petals reflexed after flowering. Outer staminodes i}/2 mm I. Basal glands tepaloid nearly as long as the stamens. 9. A. armeniacum (Nees) Mez b. Flowers tube up to 2 mm diam.; distinct; tepals erect or Outer staminodes to 1. Basal erect-patent. up 1 mm glands shorter than the stamens 15: Flowers 1. 15a. cylindrical-urceolate, mm 10. A. guianense Nees b. Flowers subglobose or broadly infundibuliform, up to 2 Y2 mm 1., rarely sub-urceolate, but then only mm 1. 16 .. 16a. Leaves reticulate above distinctly prominulously .... 17 b. Leaves smooth above 18 Leaves 6 Flowers 17a. lanceolate, —9 X 1^/2—2 cm. sub-globose; petals incurved. Outer istaminodes Y2 mm !•> filaments of 723 fertile stamens not distinct. West Indian species. A. salicifolium Gr. 17. (Sw.) b. Leaves —16 —6 Flowers infundibuli- elliptical, 12 X 3 cm. form; tepals erect-patent; outer staminodes X mm 1. Fila- ments of fertile stamens slender, distinct. Pucheri 12. A. (R. et P.) Kosterm. areolate 18a. Leaves elliptical, 7—10 X iVi —3X2 cm, minutely above. Flowers sub-urceolate, rather slender. n. A. multiflorum Kcxsterm. b. Leaves lanceolate, 6—9 X ij'a— 3 cm or elliptical, 12—19 smooth above. Flowers X 4—9 cm, globose 19 19a. Leaves lanceolate, 6—9 X 1Y2 —3 cm., soon glabrous beneath. West Indian 18. A. sericeum species .... Griueb. Leaves X tomentellous beneath b.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chec List What Survived from the PLANAFLORO Project
    Check List 10(1): 33–45, 2014 © 2014 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution What survived from the PLANAFLORO Project: PECIES S Angiosperms of Rondônia State, Brazil OF 1* 2 ISTS L Samuel1 UniCarleialversity of Konstanz, and Narcísio Department C.of Biology, Bigio M842, PLZ 78457, Konstanz, Germany. [email protected] 2 Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Campus José Ribeiro Filho, BR 364, Km 9.5, CEP 76801-059. Porto Velho, RO, Brasil. * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract: The Rondônia Natural Resources Management Project (PLANAFLORO) was a strategic program developed in partnership between the Brazilian Government and The World Bank in 1992, with the purpose of stimulating the sustainable development and protection of the Amazon in the state of Rondônia. More than a decade after the PLANAFORO program concluded, the aim of the present work is to recover and share the information from the long-abandoned plant collections made during the project’s ecological-economic zoning phase. Most of the material analyzed was sterile, but the fertile voucher specimens recovered are listed here. The material examined represents 378 species in 234 genera and 76 families of angiosperms. Some 8 genera, 68 species, 3 subspecies and 1 variety are new records for Rondônia State. It is our intention that this information will stimulate future studies and contribute to a better understanding and more effective conservation of the plant diversity in the southwestern Amazon of Brazil. Introduction The PLANAFLORO Project funded botanical expeditions In early 1990, Brazilian Amazon was facing remarkably in different areas of the state to inventory arboreal plants high rates of forest conversion (Laurance et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation and Identification of Cyclic Polyketides From
    ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CYCLIC POLYKETIDES FROM ENDIANDRA KINGIANA GAMBLE (LAURACEAE), AS BCL-XL/BAK AND MCL-1/BID DUAL INHIBITORS, AND APPROACHES TOWARD THE SYNTHESIS OF KINGIANINS Mohamad Nurul Azmi Mohamad Taib, Yvan Six, Marc Litaudon, Khalijah Awang To cite this version: Mohamad Nurul Azmi Mohamad Taib, Yvan Six, Marc Litaudon, Khalijah Awang. ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CYCLIC POLYKETIDES FROM ENDIANDRA KINGIANA GAMBLE (LAURACEAE), AS BCL-XL/BAK AND MCL-1/BID DUAL INHIBITORS, AND APPROACHES TOWARD THE SYNTHESIS OF KINGIANINS . Chemical Sciences. Ecole Doctorale Polytechnique; Laboratoires de Synthase Organique (LSO), 2015. English. tel-01260359 HAL Id: tel-01260359 https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01260359 Submitted on 22 Jan 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CYCLIC POLYKETIDES FROM ENDIANDRA KINGIANA GAMBLE (LAURACEAE), AS BCL-XL/BAK AND MCL-1/BID DUAL INHIBITORS, AND APPROACHES TOWARD THE SYNTHESIS OF KINGIANINS MOHAMAD NURUL AZMI BIN MOHAMAD TAIB FACULTY OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of Lauraceae from Espírito Santo, Brazil
    TWo NeW SPeCIeS oF LAuRACeAe FRoM eSPíRITo SANTo, BRAzIL PEDRO LUÍS RODRIGUES DE MORAES,1, 2 TAMIRIS BIANCA FERNANDES,3 IGOR HENRIQUE FREITAS AZEVEDO,4 AND TIAGO DOMINGOS MOUZINHO BARBOSA5 Abstract. Two new species from the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest of Espírito Santo State, Licaria spiritusanctensis and Ocotea teresae, are described and illustrated. Their putative relationships within the respective genera are discussed. We also provide illustrations and comments on micromorphological and anatomical features of leaves of these new species, comparing them to those of congenerics and showing that they can be useful for recognition of different taxa. Keywords: leaf cuticle, leaf vascular bundle, Licaria, Ocotea, taxonomy In this study, two new species are described respectively published a synopsis of the genus, proposing its subdivision for Licaria Aubl. and Ocotea Aubl. The work is a by-product into smaller informal entities, which encompassed 29 groups of the treatment of the Lauraceae for the Flora of Espírito of species sharing morphological affinities, and 54 species Santo, Brazil. The descriptions and illustrations of the new treated singly. No subsequent monographic treatments of species are presented below, as well as a discussion on their these groups have been published, except for the study of possible relationships with congenerics. the Ocotea indecora (Schott) Mez group (Assis and Mello- Licaria is a Neotropical genus of about 65 species Silva, 2010). A synopsis of the Central American species was (Trofimov and Rohwer, 2018 [although 77 names are published by van der Werff (2002), but the South American currently in use by different authors]), distributed from species are still less well known (Moraes and van der Werff, southern Florida and Mexico to southern Brazil and Bolivia 2011; van der Werff, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Angiosperms of Rondônia State, Brazil
    Check List 10(1): 33–45, 2014 © 2014 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution What survived from the PLANAFLORO Project: PECIES S Angiosperms of Rondônia State, Brazil OF 1* 2 ISTS L Samuel1 UniCarleialversity of Konstanz, and Narcísio Department C.of Biology, Bigio M842, PLZ 78457, Konstanz, Germany. [email protected] 2 Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Campus José Ribeiro Filho, BR 364, Km 9.5, CEP 76801-059. Porto Velho, RO, Brasil. * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract: The Rondônia Natural Resources Management Project (PLANAFLORO) was a strategic program developed in partnership between the Brazilian Government and The World Bank in 1992, with the purpose of stimulating the sustainable development and protection of the Amazon in the state of Rondônia. More than a decade after the PLANAFORO program concluded, the aim of the present work is to recover and share the information from the long-abandoned plant collections made during the project’s ecological-economic zoning phase. Most of the material analyzed was sterile, but the fertile voucher specimens recovered are listed here. The material examined represents 378 species in 234 genera and 76 families of angiosperms. Some 8 genera, 68 species, 3 subspecies and 1 variety are new records for Rondônia State. It is our intention that this information will stimulate future studies and contribute to a better understanding and more effective conservation of the plant diversity in the southwestern Amazon of Brazil. Introduction The PLANAFLORO Project funded botanical expeditions In early 1990, Brazilian Amazon was facing remarkably in different areas of the state to inventory arboreal plants high rates of forest conversion (Laurance et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 129 Libro Pm.Pdf
    588,000 590,000 592,000 594,000 596,000 598,000 ° ° 16 18 a 92°10’30" 92°9’ 92°7’30" 92°6’ 92°4’30" a 000 ic ic 2, La Laguna Reserva de la Biosfera ra Agua Caliente a a as onal i afía egidas al eomát 17 mentada fe ic pal To jbach ot vi Volcán Tacaná egid 00 eche em ográf 0 0 ci M nac Pr at eogr pa mp 00 00 Platanillo de G xico s ter uni G UT os Gu 92 o Ca ° ° ná le y : 1700 Macrolocalización n 676, 676, s ográf Cart 92 92 -93 ra ea , Mé a m. ral Prot 1, 1, RF etera etera te In te M ió pa 94° 92° 90° : o 80 Mpio. Tapachula ic ía tros 0 rr tu ia Ár Bi sc ca rte st 00 : IT ac Ta basco tament 18° l Agua Tibia 18° Me 00 Ch apas Ca Lími Lími ba Natu Veracruz ,0 Cart Na al r RGB adi nda 1 nda 3 nda 2 No a: XS 2, ral t Ta 40 par de ic : ación la lo Ta eas 1: Chi ea Ba Ba Ba Es : áf ME la ne 000 z, De , Ár la oordenadas °9’ Gr rizont 2500 ide: GRS Oaxaca rm Co el °9’ cu l Ár ca ER rre de C la 15 Chiapas r na: 15 Ge de Guatemala olocaliz ano Centralano e so 15 1600 fo Es l mbolog agen SPOT ° ° de co ca ti án de po Febrero 2005 di fi 16° 16° cr Zo Chespal Viejo genes lso lso onal 94 94 m Ho m ri Es cí In aciones a te á Elip Gu ía a de a ona Guatemala Im Si ci ones tu lc Cuadri i uz Pa Fa ci ic 28 Ma mi la Me dades em 00 cr Im Océano Na li if 0 ac xt Da Lí ca esada esada acer rv ra 29 a st o Pacífico Na Imagen SPOT bl 50 rr éano éano xa Tu oc Ve Si ut Vo on it Te Brasil Loc Po Oc Oa pec si 0 0 st 94° 92° 90° se In 00 00 mi Es ° ° 16 18 pr agen Co uentesde 674, 1600 674, Re Im 1, 1, Imagen del Área F 01 0 00 676, 1, 0 00 674, 1, 0 00 672, 1, 0 00 670, 1, 0 00 668, Las Pulgas 1, °9’ °8’ 15 °7’ 15 °6’ 15 °5’ 15 1800 15 0 0 3900 40 00 00 al 3600 00 3400 00 600, 600, 15 Muxb 3800 2400 3700 2300 3300 0" 0" ’3 ’3 °7 °7 0 0 15 3500 15 00 Piedra Parada 00 00 30 672, 28 672, 00 Simbología s 1, 2000 1, am ri a ci ano l Límite del Área Natural Protegida Mi l a tas lí ta den re i abe fe Piedra Parada sa Tipo de Suelo Is Ma ov eg 3100 a a Ca Al Ro Pr edes a ov Acrisol a ant rc La Azteca st S rd ’ ant Vi San Cristóbal ’ S Andosol Có °5 s Me °5 92 Mpio.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Lauraceae II
    500 Revision of the Lauraceae II. The genera Endlicheria, Cryptocarya (American species) and Licaria by A.J.G.H. Kostermans (Utrecht). LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS: Herbaria Lp. = Leipzig M. A. Ann = Miinchen = Arbor, Michigan. Mi. Missouri Bot. Garden B. Brussels — — Ms. = Meissner Herb. Bl. ;= Breslau (New York) NY. New Br. Brit. Museum = York - O. = Fielding Herb. Oxford Bs. = Herb. Boissier (Geneve) P. Paris C. Herb. Cosson = — (Paris) R. = Rio de Janeiro Ca. = Herb. Univ. of California St. = Stockholm D. = Berlin-Dahlem U. = Utrecht Dr. = Herb. Drake (Paris) W. = Wien DC. = Herb. De Candolle (Geneve) Ws. = Smithsonian Inst. Dl. = Herb. Delessert (Geneve) F. = Field Museum (Chicago) Other abbreviations G. - Gottingen Gr. = Gray Herb. Ar. = Arowaccan language Arnold Arboretum H. = (Dutch Guiana) = H.M.G. = Herb. Museu Goeldi B.W. Boschwezen H.R.J. = Herb. Rio de Janeiro (Forestry Bureau) Car. K. = Kjobnhavn = Caraibic language Ki. Kiel N. = = (Germany) Negro English Kw. = Kew (Dutch Guiana) L. Leiden Sar. Saramaccan = z= language Lg. =: Leningrad (Dutch Guiana) Lam. Herb. Lamarck S. Surinam Dutch = (Paris) = The literature and synonyms, cited in this monograph, are verified by myself. All specimens mentioned are identified or verified by myself. I wish to tender my best thanks to the Directors and Curators of the above mentioned herbaria for their kind assistance. 1. The genus Endlicheria. Endlicheria Nees in Linnaea 8 (non Presl) (1833), p. 37; id., Progr. (1833), p. 16; id., Syst. (1836), p. 365; Endl., Gen. (1837), *) For the discussion of this name see: Kostermans in Meded. Bot. Mus. Utrecht 41. 25 (1936), p. 501 Ench. Pl. 2 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Redbay (Persea Borbonia): Drifting Toward Oblivion Dr
    Redbay (Persea borbonia): Drifting Toward Oblivion Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care, Warnell School, UGA At the edge of streams, springs, and swamps hides the redbay tree. Redbay (Persea borbonia), with its evergreen aromatic leathery leaves, dark blue fruit hanging on into winter, and reddish bark, is a jewel among trees. The Native Americans found a host of medicinal uses for this medium sized tree. Early European Americans found the fine grained, highly polished wood to be perfect trim for bay boats and sailing ships. Southern gumbos require redbay leaf flavoring to be authentic. Now exotic pests threaten this unique American tree. This publication is designed to assist people understand the great variability and confusion regarding redbay taxonomy, its lineage, where it grows, its identifying characteristics, and stress problems. Scientific Choices The scientific name today for redbay is Persea borbonia, but that was not always the case. Redbay was first clearly identified in 1739 and taken for plant collections. Redbay has had a number of different scientific names. The genus and this species have many overlapping descriptions with various other species, varieties and forms, leading to taxonomic confusion. The genus name Persea was first used in 1601 and is a Greek derived name for a middle-Eastern or Persian tree with fruit growing from its stem. Over the years, this genus has been called many things including Persea (1601), Laurus (1731), Borbonia (1760), Farnesia (1763), Menestrata (1835), Tamala (1838), and Nothaphoebe (1898). Other early scientific names for redbay included Laurus caroliniensis (1731), Laurus borbonia (1753), Laurus axillaris (1789), Laurus elongata (1796), Borbonia caroliniensis (1825), Persea caroliniensis (1836), Tamala borbonia (1838), Tamala caroliniensis (1838), Nothaphoebe borbonica (1898), Persea littoralis (1903), Tamala littoralis (1913), Borbonia borbonia (1922), and Borbonia littoralis (1922).
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Florida's Endangered and Threatened Plants 1
    NOTES ON FLORIDA'S ENDANGERED AND THREATENED PLANTS 1 Nancy C. Coile2 The Regulated Plant Index is based on information provided by the Endangered Plant Advisory Council (EPAC), a group of seven individuals who represent academic, industry, and environmental interests (Dr. Loran C. Anderson, Dr. Daniel F. Austin,. Mr. Charles D. D aniel III, Mr. David M . Drylie, Jr., Ms. Eve R. Hannahs, Mr. Richard L. Moyroud, and Dr. Daniel B. Ward). Rule Chap. 5B-40, Florida Administrative Code, contains the "Regulated Plant Index" (5B-40.0055) and lists endangered, threatened, and commercially exploited plant species for Florida; defines the categories; lists instances where permits may be issued; and describes penalties for vio lations. Copies of this Rule may be obtained from Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, P. O. Box 147100, Gainesville, Fl 32614-7100. Amended 20 September 2000, the "Regulated Plant Index" contains 415 endangered species, 113 threatened species, and eight commercially exploited species. Descriptions of these rare species are often difficult to locate. Florida does not have a single manual covering the flora of the entire state. Long and Lakela s manual (1971) focuses on the area south of Glades County; Clewell (1985) is a guide for the Panhandle; and Wunderlin (1998) is a guide for the entire state of Florida but lacks descriptions. Small (1933) is an excellent resource, but must be used with great care since the nomenclature is outdated and frequently disputed. Clewell (1985) and Wunderlin (1998 ) are guides with keys to the flora, but lack species descriptions. Distribution maps (Wund erlin and Hansen, 200 0) are available over the Internet through the University of South Florida Herbarium [www.plantatlas.usf.edu/].
    [Show full text]
  • Seeds and Plants Imported
    Issued March 30, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY. WILLIAM A. TAYLOR, Chitf of Bureau. INVENTORY OF SEEDS AND PLANTS IMPORTED BY THE OFFICE OF FOREIGN SEED AND PLANT INTRODUCTION DURING THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 1 TO JUKE 30, 1915. (No. 43; Nos. 40389 TO 40895.) WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING CPPIOE. Issued March 30,1918. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY. WILLIAM A. TAYLOR, Chief of Bureau. INVENTORY OF SEEDS AND PUNTS IMPORTED OFFICE OF FOREIGN SEED AND PLANT INTRODUCTION DURING THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 1 TO JUNE 30, 1915. (No. 43; Nos. 40389 TO 40895. ) WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING CFFIOE, 191& BUREAU OF PLANT INDUSTRY. Chief of Bureau, WILLIAM A. TAYLOR. Associate Chief of Bureau, KARL F. KBLLERMAN. Officer in Charge of Publications, J. E. ROCKWELL. Chief Cleric, JAMBS E. JONES. FOREIGN SEED AND PLANT INTRODUCTION. SCIENTIFIC STAFF. David Fairchild, Agricultural Explorer in Charge. P. H. Dorsett, Plant Introducer, in Charge of Plant Introduction Field Stations. B. T. Galloway, Plant Pathologist, in Charge of Plant Protection and Plant Propagation. Peter Bisset, Plant Introducer, in Charge of Foreign Plant Distribution. Frank N. Meyer, Wilson Popenoe, and F. C. Reimer, Agricultural Explorers. H. C. Skeels, S. C. Stuntz, and R. A. Young, Botanical Assistants. D. A. Bisset, R. N. Jones, P. G. Russell, and Glen P. Van Eseltine, Assistants. Robert L. Beagles, Superintendent, Plant Introduction Field Station, Chico, Cal. E. O. Orpet, Assistant in Plant Introduction, Chico, Cal. Edward Simmonds, Superintendent, Plant Introduction Field Station, Miami, Fla. John M. Rankin, Superintendent, Yarrow Plant Introduction Field Station, Rockville, Md.
    [Show full text]
  • Redbay (Persea Borbonia): Drifting Toward Oblivion by Dr
    Native Tree Series WSFNR12-9 May 2012 Redbay (Persea borbonia): Drifting Toward Oblivion by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care At the edge of streams, springs, and swamps hides the redbay tree. Redbay (Persea borbonia), with its evergreen aromatic leathery leaves, dark blue fruit hanging on into winter, and reddish bark, is a jewel among trees. The Native Americans found a host of medicinal uses for this medium sized tree. Early European Ameri- cans found the fine grained, highly polished wood to be perfect trim for bay boats and sailing ships. Southern gumbos require redbay leaf flavoring to be authentic. Now exotic pests threaten this unique American tree. This publication is designed to assist people understand the great variability and confusion regarding redbay taxonomy, its lineage, where it grows, its identifying characteristics, and stress problems. Scientific Choices The scientific name today for redbay is Persea borbonia, but that was not always the case. Redbay was first clearly identified in 1739 and taken for plant collections. Redbay has had a number of different scientific names. The genus and this species have many overlapping descriptions with various other species, varieties and forms, leading to taxonomic confusion. The genus name Persea was first used in 1601 and is a Greek derived name for a middle-Eastern or Persian tree with fruit growing from its stem. Over the years, this genus has been called many things including Persea (1601), Laurus (1731), Borbonia (1760), Farnesia (1763), Menestrata (1835), Tamala (1838), and Nothaphoebe (1898). Other early scientific names for redbay included Laurus caroliniensis (1731), Laurus borbonia (1753), Laurus axillaris (1789), Laurus elongata (1796), Borbonia caroliniensis (1825), Persea caroliniensis (1836), Tamala borbonia (1838), Tamala caroliniensis (1838), Nothaphoebe borbonica (1898), Persea littoralis (1903), Tamala littoralis (1913), Borbonia borbonia (1922), and Borbonia littoralis (1922).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Trees Forest Regions
    FOREST TREES ~ FOREST REGIONS of~/ie UNITED STATES U.S. DEPA-RTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION NUMBER 217 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Miscellaneous Publication No, 217 Issued January 1936 Washington, D.C. Slightly Revised June 1940 FOREST TREES AND FOREST REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES By WILBUR R. MATTOON, extension forester, Division of Private Forestry, Forest Service CONTENTS Page Page Introduction _ 1 Tropical forest legion 43 Natural groups of forest trees.. _ 2 Tropical forest trees 43 Native trees in great variety 2 Rocky Mountain forest region 43 Desci iptive list of native forest trees 4 Rocky Mountain forest trees 45 Forest trees of the United States 4 Pacific coast forest region 45 Eastern forest trees 5 Pacific coast forest trees 46 Western forest trees 24 Forests of Alaska 46 Forest regions of the United States 33 Forests of Puerto Rico 48 Extent of forests 33 Forests of Hawaii 49 Timber contents of forests 36 Hawaiian forest trees 51 Forest types or tree associations 37 Tree labels 51 Northern forest region 39 Publications on forest trees 52 Northern forest trees _. 39 State forest-tree guides 52 Central hardwood fcrest region 40 Books on forest trees 53 Central hardwood forest trees 40 Federal publications 53 Southern forest region 41 Southern forest trees 43 INTRODUCTION Trees serve us in so many different ways that we are naturally interested in knowing more about the trees of our country and the tree communities, or forests, in which we live or which we visit. More people than ever before are now getting out of doors and visiting unfamiliar sections of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Redbay ( Persea Borbonia )
    Redbay (Persea borbonia): A Tree Of Confusion by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia 7/2006 At the edge of streams, springs, and swamps hides the redbay tree. Redbay (Persea borbonia), with its evergreen aromatic leathery leaves, dark blue fruit hanging on into winter, and reddish bark is a jewel among trees. The Native Americans found a host of medicinal uses for this medium sized tree. Early European Americans found the fine grained, highly polished wood to be perfect trim for bay boats and sailing ships. Southern gumbos require redbay leaf flavoring to be authentic. Now exotic pests threaten this unique American tree. This publication is to assist people understand the great variability and confusion regarding redbay taxonomy, its lineage and where it grows. Scientific Name Choices The scientific name for redbay is Persea borbonia. Redbay was first clearly identified in 1739 and taken for plant collections. Redbay has had a number of different scientific names over the years. The genus and this species have many overlapping descriptions with various other species, varieties and forms, leading to taxonomic confusion. The genus name Persea was first used in 1601 and is a Greek derived name for a middle-eastern or Persian tree with fruit growing from its stem. Over the years, this genus has been called many things including Persea (1601), Laurus (1731), Borbonia (1760), Farnesia (1763), Menestrata (1835), Tamala (1838), and Nothaphoebe (1898). Other early scientific names for redbay included Laurus caroliniensis (1731), Laurus borbonia (1753), Laurus axillaris (1789), Laurus elongata (1796), Borbonia caroliniensis (1825), Persea caroliniensis (1836), Tamala borbonia (1838), Tamala caroliniensis (1838), Nothaphoebe borbonica (1898), Persea littoralis (1903), Tamala littoralis (1913), Borbonia borbonia (1922), and Borbonia littoralis (1922).
    [Show full text]