Habitat Selection and Diet in Two Species of Pipefish from Seagrass: Sex Differences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Habitat Selection and Diet in Two Species of Pipefish from Seagrass: Sex Differences MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 55: 2330. 1989 Published July 6 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Habitat selection and diet in two species of pipefish from seagrass: sex differences ' School of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia Fisheries Research Institute. PO Box 21, Cronulla, NSW 2230. Australia ABSTRACT: Pipefishes Stigmatopora argus and S. nigra were collected dunng field expenments to test responses of seagrass-associated fishes to changes in the height and density of seagrass leaves. Most pipefish greatly preferred long, high-density seagrass leaves to short or low-density leaves. The exception was female S. argus, which were found in thinned long seagrass as often as in dense long. Females of both species had fuller guts than males Irrespective of habitat, consistent with the idea that males suffer some loss of feeding efficiency due to adaptations for brooding young. Sex ratios measured at 2 different spatial scales were biased in favour of males for both species. For both species the clutch size of male pipefish with completely filled broodpouches was, on average, the same as the number of developing ovanan eggs in females. These results are revlewed in light of current sexual selection theory. INTRODUCTION Because syngnathid males invest heavily in offspring relative to males of other taxa, it is possible that they The family Syngnathidae - pipefishes and seahorses rather than females are the sex in limited supply. To the - is characterized by extensive male parental invest- extent that this is true, sexual selection theory would ment in the rearing of young. In many species, males predict that female rather than male syngnathids will carry the eggs and sometimes newly hatched young in have the various features listed above as typically male a broodpouch, located on the ventral surface just characteristics, and the syngnathlds have been pointed behind the vent (see Breder & Rosen 1966 for a general out as interesting and important test cases for sexual review). The unusual reproductive biology of this selection theory (Trivers 1972, 1985, Williams 1975). group has been the subject of many popular articles but However, little quantitative evidence has so far been there is little detailed ecological information about reported as to relevant aspects of the field biology of them (Gronell 1984, Howard & Koehn 1985). This is syngnathids. surprising given that syngnathids form a large compo- Various kinds of evidence are relevant to assessing nent of fish communities associated with seagrasses the syngnathids as tests of sexual selection theory. (Pollard 1984). First, there is observational evidence as to lunds and Sexual selection theory predicts that the sex malung degrees of sexual dimorphism (Breder & Rosen 1966), the biggest investment in supporting offspring dlbe a reproductive behaviour (Gudger 1905, Fiedler 1954, limiting resource for the other sex. Ordinarily females Crone11 1984, Berglund et al. 1988) and sex ratios are the limiting resource for males. The sex which does (Strawn 1958, Bayer 1980, Gronell 1984). Second, there not invest as much (ordinarily males) wlll compete is evidence as to the actual magnitude of investment by more intensively for reproductive success. This sex is males relative to females. Only Berglund et al. (1986) likely to have more development of secondary sexual have attempted to measure investment on a physiologi- characters, more elaborate sexual display, and greater cal basis. They found some evidence for direct energy variance of lifetime reproductive success. The 'high- transfer from males to offspring but concluded duect risk high-reward' situation in which members of this energy investment by males was not greater than by sex find themselves may lead to lower survivorship and females. Many technical difficulties lie in the way of a correspondingly biased operational sex ratio. improving these measurements. Further, physiological O Inter-Research/Pnnted in F. R. Germany 017 1-8630/89/0055/0023/$ 03.00 24 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Sei evidence does not settle the question of relative cost of For both Posidonia and Zostera, each station was a reproduction, because no data exist as to losses in block of 4 contiguous treatments, with each treatment aghty due to the male broodpouch, with possible costs consisting of a 6 X 6m plot of seagrass. Seagrass treat- in higher predation or less efficient feeding. ments were (1) dense long (untreated) leaves; (2) long Here we contribute a third kind of evidence, on leaves thinned to 30% untreated density; (3) dense whether habitat selection by the sexes is different leaves cut to 30 O/O untreated height; and (4) leaves cut under field experimental conditions. The sexes might and thinned to 3096 untreated height and density. be expected to show differences in habitat selection Treatment positions were randomised for each station. because of sexual display behaviour, or because differ- The manipulated level of treatments approximated ences in colouration and agility lead to differences in lowest natural leaf density and height of Zostera and feeding tactics or predation hazard. Our evidence arose Posidonia in Botany Bay (Bell & Westoby 1986a). initially as a by-product of 2 field experiments in which Fishes were collected using fine meshed nets and the height and density of seagrass leaves were manipu- rotenone poison. Detailed descriptions of the sampling lated to study responses of all fish species (Bell & stations, preparation of seagrass treatments, collection Westoby 1986a). Two pipefish species were abundant of fauna, and the statistical implications of the experi- in these experiments, and effects on overall numbers mental design are given in Bell & Westoby (1986a). have already been reported. Density responses to man- Bell & Westoby (1986a) did not sex pipefish but ipulated seagrass were behavioural and short-term analyzed the data for responses of total abundances to rather than due to differential mortality (Bell & Wes- treatments. Here we are concerned with whether adult toby 1986a). Stigrnatopora argus was the predominant males and females responded differently within each pipefish in Posidonia australis beds in Botany Bay, pipefish species. After testing for homogeneity of var- Australia, whilst S. nigra was most abundant in Zostera iance we used a 4-way randomized complete block capricorni habitats (Bell & Westoby 1986a). Here we design ANOVA (Sokal & Rohlf 1969) with height, report data with the sexes analysed separately. In addi- density, and sex being fixed factors, and with blocks tion we present data on sex ratios from these and other (=stations) being a random factor. All significant populations in different seagrass beds (Bell & Westoby interactions were decomposed using the Student-New- 1986b). We measured gut contents to assess the man-Keuls (SNK) a posteriori comparison of means. hypothesis that there are differences between sexes or Sexing pipefish. Although both species are sexually between habitats in feeding success, or interactions, dimorphic it was often difficult to distinguish small whereby the best habitat for feeding is different females from juvenile fish. Thus, we decided to classify depending on sex. as juveniles all fishes smaller than the minimum length We do not present the evidence reported here as a at which a male broodpouch was present (minimum complete test of sexual selection theory in these syng- male total length). All fishes larger than the minimum nathids. However we believe it represents a useful male total length were classified as adults. Males were increase in knowledge of relevant aspects of biology in easily recognized by the presence of a ventral brood- these organisms, which can be used to test some pre- pouch on the tail. All other fishes were classified as dictions made by the theory females even if they did not possess any of the female secondary sexual characters. Thus it is possible that we overestimated the proportion of adult females in the METHODS reproductive population. A few damaged fish which could not be measured, or sexed accurately using sexu- Source of data. Data presented in this paper were ally dimorphic characters, were excluded from the derived from specimens of Stigmatopora argus and analysis S. nigra collected during the field experiments of Bell & Size distribution and sex ratio. We measured the Westoby (1986a). These experiments were designed to total lengths (TL) of all pipefish whose tails had not assess whether changes in leaf height and density of been broken during preservation to (1) examine the seagrass evoked changes in the abundance of associ- size distribution of the sampled populations, and (2) ated fishes. A brief summary of the experiments is set calculate the minimum male total length for accurate out below. sexing of small adult pipefish. Seagrass manipulation experiments. Stigmatopora We obtained sex ratios for Stigmatopora argus and S. argus were collected from 4 Posidonia australis stations nigra from 2 sources: (1) the seagrass manipulation during Apnl-May 1983, and S. njgra from 5 Zostera experiments reported here; and (2) a comparative capricorni stations during October-November 1982, all study based on collections from natural Posidonia and in Botany Bay (34" l's, 151" 11' E) on the east coast of Zostera seagrass beds of varylng height and density Australia. throughout Botany Bay (Bell & Westoby 1986b). The Steffe et al.: Habitat selection in pipefish 25 Posidonia collections of S. argus were made during and S. nigra deposit their eggs into membranous egg May 1983 whilst the Zostera collections of S. nigra were compartments within the broodpouch we discarded all made during December 1982. fish in which the middle portion of the pouch was Dietary analyses. The diets of Stigmatopora argus empty but had egg compartments. In these instances and S. nigra were examined to determine whether the we regarded loss of eggs as an artifact of preservation observed responses of male and female pipefish to and handling. changes in seagrass leaf height and density were We dissected females and examined their strap-like associated with differences in feeding.
Recommended publications
  • Does Plant Morphology Influence Fish Fauna Associated with Seagrass Meadows?
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses : Honours Theses 2002 Does plant morphology influence fish fauna associated with seagrass meadows? Michael C. Burt Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Burt, M. C. (2002). Does plant morphology influence fish fauna associated with seagrass meadows?. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/568 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/568 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Some Tasmanian Fishes: Part Ix
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA, VOLUME 94 OBSERVATIONS ON SOME TASMANIAN FISHES: PART IX By E. O. G. SCOTT One text figure ABSTRACT West Coast '. Again, Bridport, Lat. 41 0 01' S., Long. A case of mass mortality in Navodon setosus 147 0 23' E., and st. Helens, Lat. 41 0 20' S., Long. (Waite), 1899 [Aluteridae], a species now first 148 0 14' E., are approximately equidistant-west­ formally recorded from Tasmania, is reported: ward, southward, respectively-from Cape Port­ land; yet the former is a 'North East Coast', the some features of two juveniles are described and 0 figured. Taxonomic data on Mitotichthys tuckeri latter an 'East Coast " town: Stanley, Lat. 40 (Scott), 1942 [Syngnathidae], hitherto known 47' S., Long. 145 0 19' E., which stands in about the only from the holotype, are extended by an account same relation to Cape Grim as Bridport does to of two virtual topotypes. Miscellaneous observations Cape Portland, belongs to the' Far North West '. are made on Stigmatopora argus (Richardson), Entries in tables of synonymy, particularly 1840 [Syngnathidae] (status of several species citations from the earlier authors, are not neces­ commonly reduced to synonymy); Lampris regius sarily identical with the originals in point of typo­ (Bonnaterre), 1788 [Lampridae] (third Tasmanian graphical detail (earlier employment of initial record; dimensions) ; Dactylosargus arctidens capitals for some trivial names; no general, cr (Richardson), 1839 [Aplodactylidae] (differences indescriminate use of parentheses; and so on); from published accounts and figures; general being rendered in a standard pattern in accord observations); Lepidopus caudatus Euphrasen), with contemporary conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Population Dynamics of Syngnathid Fishes Within Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
    Current Zoology 56 (1): 118−133, 2010 An examination of the population dynamics of syngnathid fishes within Tampa Bay, Florida, USA Heather D. MASONJONES1*, Emily ROSE1,2, Lori Benson McRAE1, Danielle L. DIXSON1,3 1 Biology Department, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL 33606, USA 2 Biology Department, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 3 School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, AU Abstract Seagrass ecosystems worldwide have been declining, leading to a decrease in associated fish populations, especially those with low mobility such as syngnathids (pipefish and seahorses). This two-year pilot study investigated seasonal patterns in density, growth, site fidelity, and population dynamics of Tampa Bay (FL) syngnathid fishes at a site adjacent to two marinas un- der construction. Using a modified mark-recapture technique, fish were collected periodically from three closely located sites that varied in seagrass species (Thalassia spp., Syringodium spp., and mixed-grass sites) and their distance from open water, but had consistent physical/chemical environmental characteristics. Fish were marked, photographed for body size and gender measure- ments, and released the same day at the capture site. Of the 5695 individuals surveyed, 49 individuals were recaptured, indicating a large, flexible population. Population density peaks were observed in July of both years, with low densities in late winter and late summer. Spatially, syngnathid densities were highest closest to the mouth of the bay and lowest near the shoreline. Seven species of syngnathid fishes were observed, and species-specific patterns of seagrass use emerged during the study. However, only two species, Syngnathus scovelli and Hippocampus zosterae, were observed at high frequencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Feeding Ecology of Syngnathids Inhabiting Mediterranean Seagrasses
    POPULATION DYNAMICS AND FEEDING ECOLOGY OF SYNGNATHIDS INHABITING MEDITERRANEAN SEAGRASSES JULIA CASTRO FERNÁNDEZ-PACHECO TRABAJO FINAL DE MÁSTER BIOLOGÍA MARINA CURSO 2017/2018 TUTORES: JORGE TERRADOS MUÑOZ INÉS CASTEJÓN SILVO PABLO ARECHAVALA LÓPEZ FECHA DE DEFENSA: 2 DE JULIO DE 2018 - 1 - El Dr. Jorge Terrados Munóz, la Dra. Inés Castejón Silvo y el Dr. Pablo Arechavala López, investigadores del Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados (IMEDEA –CSIC/UIB), y co-tutores del Trabajo de Fin de Máster de la alumna Julia Castro Fernández-Pacheco (DNI: 51489996B ), HACEN CONSTAR: Que la alumna ha realizado satisfactoriamente su Trabajo de Fin de Máster, el cual está finalizado, evaluado y listo para su presentación y defensa en la convocatoria de Julio del 2018 en el Máster Interuniversitario en Biología Marina (Facultades de Biología de Galicia). Para que conste a efectos oportunos, firman en Esporles el 20 de Junio de 2018. Firmado digitalmente por CASTEJON SILVO Firmado por ARECHAVALA LOPEZ Firmado por TERRADOS INES - 51088754G PABLO - 09034684P el día MUÑOZ JORGE MIGUEL - Fecha: 2018.06.19 19/06/2018 con un certificado emitido por AC FNMT Usuarios 27431617T el día 16:03:16 +02'00' 20/06/2018 con un Dr. Jorge Terrados Muñoz Dra. Inés Castejón Silvo Dr. Pablo Arechavala López Firmado digitalmente por DOMINGUE DOMINGUEZ CONDE JESUS - 36046949S Nombre de reconocimiento (DN): Z CONDE c=ES, serialNumber=IDCES-36046949S, C/ MIQUEL MARQUÉS, 21 givenName=JESUS, 07190 ESPORLES JESUS - sn=DOMINGUEZ CONDE, ILLES BALEARS cn=DOMINGUEZ CONDE JESUS - TELF. 971 611 716 36046949S FAX 971 611 761 36046949S Fecha: 2018.06.22 12:24:51 +02'00' INDEX ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................- 2 - INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nektonic Assemblages Determined from Baited Underwater Video in Protected Versus Unprotected Shallow Seagrass Meadows on Kangaroo Island, South Australia
    Vol. 503: 205–218, 2014 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published April 29 doi: 10.3354/meps10733 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Nektonic assemblages determined from baited underwater video in protected versus unprotected shallow seagrass meadows on Kangaroo Island, South Australia Sasha K. Whitmarsh1,*, Peter G. Fairweather1, Daniel J. Brock2, David Miller3 1School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia 2Coast and Marine Program, Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board, 35 Dauncey Street, Kingscote, Kangaroo Island, South Australia 5223, Australia 3Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, 1 Richmond Road, Keswick, South Australia 5035, Australia ABSTRACT: As the number of marine protected areas grows worldwide, it is important to under- stand how existing protected areas have functioned. Baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) are becoming a widely used technique for monitoring reef fish, but with few studies hav- ing so far used BRUVS in seagrass meadows, it remains unclear how they perform within these habitats. The aims of this study were to trial the use of BRUVS in shallow seagrass habitats and to compare animals observed at Pelican Lagoon Aquatic Reserve to 2 broadly similar locations on Kangaroo Island that have had no protection. BRUVS identified 47 distinguishable taxa from 5 phyla, with the majority (79%) of those being fishes. Assemblages taking into account relative abundances were not significantly different between protected and unprotected areas; however, species compositions alone varied significantly across all 3 locations. Only 2 out of 18 commer- cially and/or recreationally targeted species had a higher abundance within the reserve. Overall, BRUVS were found to be suitable for use in seagrass habitats; however, some limitations (particu- larly the potential for obstruction of the camera by seagrass blades) may exist.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WESTERN PORT MARINE ENVIRONMENT Based on a Report to the Environment Protection Authority by Consulting Environmental Engineers
    l-he Western Port Marine Environment ENViRONMENT PROTEcnON AUTHORITY Making a difference ----... ~ .. -.- THE WESTERN PORT MARINE ENVIRONMENT Based on a report to the Environment Protection Authority by Consulting Environmental Engineers Environment Protection Authority State Government of Victor' March 1996 333.9164 The Western Port 099452 marine environment WES oopy 1 THE WESTERN PORT MARThTE ENVIRONMENT Based on a report to the Environment Protection Authority by Consulting Environmental Engineers Edited by: David May and Andy Stephens Catchment and Marine Studies Unit EnVironment Protection Authority Olderfleet Buildings 477 Collins Street Melbourne Victoria 3000 Australia Printed on recycled paper Publication 493 © Environment Protection Authority, April 1996 ISBN 0 7306 7509 2 FORE\VORD Western Port and its surrounding catchment are highly regarded as a recreational and commercial resource, and is one of Victorias most valuable assets. The terrestrial and marine ecosystems found in this area contain a large variety of plant and animal communities on a scale not found in other parts of Australia. The Western Port catchment supports a large agricultural industry and is one of the most important and productive agricultural areas in the State. Western Port provides a large recreational amenity for fishing, boating and other activities, supports commercial fisheries and is an important deep water port linking industry with Australian and overseas markets. The marine aod coastal environment of Western Port consists of a large number of interdependent ecosystems. The loss of about 170km2 of intertidal seagrass during the late 1970s caused a major ecological change to the marine environment. A reduction in commercial and recreational fishing followed this event and highlights the dependence of healthy ecosystems on the maintenance of others.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY Syngnathidae Bonaparte, 1831 - Pipefishes, Seahorses
    FAMILY Syngnathidae Bonaparte, 1831 - pipefishes, seahorses SUBFAMILY Syngnathinae Bonaparte, 1831 - tail-brooding pipefishes, seahorses [=Signatidi, Aphyostomia, Lophobranchi, Syngnathidae, Scyphini, Siphostomini, Doryrhamphinae, Nerophinae, Doryrhamphinae, Solegnathinae, Gastrotokeinae, Gastrophori, Urophori, Doryichthyina, Sygnathoidinae (Syngnathoidinae), Phyllopteryginae, Acentronurinae, Leptoichthyinae, Haliichthyinae] Notes: Signatidi Rafinesque, 1810b:36 [ref. 3595] (ordine) Syngnathus [published not in latinized form before 1900; not available, Article 11.7.2] Aphyostomia Rafinesque, 1815:90 [ref. 3584] (family) ? Syngnathus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Lophobranchi Jarocki, 1822:326, 328 [ref. 4984] (family) ? Syngnathus [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Syngnathidae Bonaparte, 1831:163, 185 [ref. 4978] (family) Syngnathus Scyphini Nardo, 1843:244 [ref. 31940] (subfamily) Scyphius [correct stem is Scyphi- Sheiko 2013:75 [ref. 32944]] Siphostomini Bonaparte, 1846:9, 89 [ref. 519] (subfamily) Siphostoma [correct stem is Siphostomat-; subfamily name sometimes seen as Siphonostominae based on Siphonostoma, but that name preoccupied in Copepoda] Doryrhamphinae Kaup, 1853:233 [ref. 2569] (subfamily) Doryrhamphus Kaup, 1856 [no valid type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Nerophinae Kaup, 1853:234 [ref. 2569] (subfamily) Nerophis Doryrhamphinae Kaup, 1856c:54 [ref. 2575] (subfamily) Doryrhamphus Solegnathinae Gill, 1859b:149 [ref. 1762] (subfamily) Solegnathus [Duncker 1912:231 [ref. 1156] used Solenognathina (subfamily) based on Solenognathus] Gastrotokeinae Gill, 1896c:158 [ref. 1743] (subfamily) Gasterotokeus [as Gastrotokeus, name must be corrected Article 32.5.3; ever corrected?] Gastrophori Duncker, 1912:220, 227 [ref. 1156] (group) [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Urophori Duncker, 1912:220, 231 [ref. 1156] (group) [no stem of the type genus, not available, Article 11.7.1.1] Doryichthyina Duncker, 1912:220, 229 [ref.
    [Show full text]
  • TS3 Spectral Sensitivity.Pdf (295.2Kb)
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Biological and Marine Sciences 2021-06-04 Marine artificial light at night: An empirical and technical guide Davies, T http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17085 10.1111/2041-210X.13653 Methods in Ecology and Evolution Wiley All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Table S3 Quantified spectral sensitivity of marine organisms. Given are phylum, scientific and common species names (currently accepted based on WoRMS database, in brackets are names as cited in reference), life stage, peak spectral sensitivity (as λ-max in nm) and method of quantification. The list is non-exhaustive. Dedicated reviews exists for instance for coral reef teleost (Cortesi et al., 2020), deep-sea teleost (de Busserolles et al., 2020), lampreys (Fain, 2020) and sharks and rays (Hart, 2020). Schweikert et al. (2018) consolidated a list of variation in rod spectral sensitivity of > 400 Actinopterygii with habitat and depth. Phylum Species (Taxon) Common name Life stage Spectral sensitivity Method Reference (as λ-max in nm) Annelida Platynereis dumerilii - Larvae 410, 490 Behavioural test Jékely et al., 2008 Arthropoda Afruca tangeri (Uca West
    [Show full text]
  • Links Between Seagrass Habitats, Piscivorous Fishes and Their Fish Prey
    MELBOURNE Links between seagrass habitats, piscivorous fishes and their fish prey Authors Dr Jeremy S. Hindell Dr Michael J. Keough Dr Gregory P. Jenkins Project No. 1999/215 F I S H E R I E S R E S E A R C H & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Title Links between seagrass habitats, piscivorous fishes and their fish prey Authors Hindell, J.S.' Keough, M.J.' Jenkins, G.P.2 Address 'Department of Zoology University of Melbourne PARKVILLE, 3010 2 Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute Weeroona Parade QUEENSCLIFF, 3225 September, 2000 ISBN: The information contained in this document is solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has been prepared and no representation is to be made or is to be implied as being made to any third party. Pj FRDC 1999/215 Links between predatory fishes and seagrass Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Non Technical Summary .................................................................................................... 5 Background.......................................................................................................................... 8 Need .................................................................................................................................... 12 Objectives........................................................................................................................... 13 Methods.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Specialisation in a Critically Endangered Pipefish Revealed by Faecal Edna Metabarcoding
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.05.425398; this version posted January 6, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Dietary specialisation in a Critically Endangered pipefish revealed by faecal eDNA metabarcoding Ofentse K. Ntshudisane1,*, Arsalan Emami-Khoyi1,*, Gavin Gouws2,3, Sven-Erick Weiss1,3, Nicola C. James2, Jody-Carynn Oliver1, Laura Tensen1, Claudia M. Schnelle1, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren1, Taryn Bodill2, Paul D. Cowley2, Alan K. Whitfield2, Peter R. Teske1,** 1Centre for Ecological Genomics and Wildlife Research, Department of Zoology, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa 2National Research Foundation – South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag 1015, Makhanda 6140, South Africa 3Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, Rhodes University, Makhanda 6140, South Africa *These authors contributed equally **Author for correspondence. Email: [email protected] ORCID: OKN, 0000-0001-8950-5563; AEK, 0000-0002-9525-4745; GG, 0000-0003- 2770-940X; NJ, 0000-0002-6015-359X; CMS, 0000-0001-8254-1916; BvV, 0000- 0002-5334-5358; PDC, 0000-0003-1246-4390; AWK, 0000-0003-1452-7367; PRT, 0000-0002-2838-7804 Abstract The estuarine pipefish, Syngnathus watermeyeri, is one of the rarest animals in Africa and occurs in only two South African estuaries. The species was declared provisionally extinct in 1994, but was later rediscovered and is currently listed by the IUCN as Critically Endangered. A conservation programme was launched in 2017, with the re-introduction of captive-bred individuals into estuaries where this species was recorded historically was the main aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Rna-Seq to Study the Sex-Role Reversed Gulf Pipefish: Are Patterns of Sex-Bias in Gene Expression Different When We Are Dealing with Mr
    USING RNA-SEQ TO STUDY THE SEX-ROLE REVERSED GULF PIPEFISH: ARE PATTERNS OF SEX-BIAS IN GENE EXPRESSION DIFFERENT WHEN WE ARE DEALING WITH MR. MOM? by ANDRIA PAIGE BEAL Bachelor of Science, 2014 Tarleton State University Stephenville, Texas Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the College of Science and Engineering Texas Christian University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science August 2016 Copyright by Andria Paige Hubner Beal 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to first thank Dr. Matthew Hale for not only his help and guidance on completing this project but also for being a true mentor. Secondly, I would like to acknowledge Dr. Douglas Martin for showing us the way to finding our samples and then helping us collect those samples. Of course, none of this would have been possible without the Teaching Assistantship and the Adkins Funding so I would like to extend my thanks to the TCU Biology Department for providing me the means by which to accomplish this amazing opportunity to do science. In addition I would like to thank my fiancé and family for supporting me through this endeavor and being there for me every step of the way, I love you all very much. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ii List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ………… iv List of Tables ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. v I. Introduction ...………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1 II. Methods ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 Sampling …………………………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]