DOCSLIB.ORG

Does Plant Morphology Influence Fish Fauna Associated with Seagrass Meadows?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Does Plant Morphology Influence Fish Fauna Associated with Seagrass Meadows? Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses : Honours Theses 2002 Does plant morphology influence fish fauna associated with seagrass meadows? Michael C. Burt Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Burt, M. C. (2002). Does plant morphology influence fish fauna associated with seagrass meadows?. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/568 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/568 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. DOES PLANT MORPHOLOGY INFLUENCE FISH FAUNA ASSOCIATED WITH SEAGRASS MEADOWS? by Michael C. BURT This thesis is submitted for the award of Bachelor of Science (Environmental Management) with Honours at the School ofNatural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia. DATE OF SUBMISSION: 22"" November 2002 Supervisor: Dr Glenn HYNDES, Edith Cowan University USE OF THESIS The Use of Thesis statement is not included in this version of the thesis. DECLARATION I certify that this thesis does not, to the best of my knowledge and belief, incorporate without acknowledgement any material previously submitted for a degree or diploma in any institution of higher education; contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text; or contain any defamatory material. J Signature: Date: ;A ;)._I {I I ?-- 00 L I I I I ABSTRACT Three distinct seagrass habitats were sampled to determine whether fish assemblages differed between meadows comprising of different seagrass species with different morphological characteristics and whether plant morphology influences species assemblages. Three scagrass habitats consisting of Posidonia sinuosa, Posidonia coriacea and meadows of a mixture of P. coriacea and Heterozostera tasmanica in the Success Bank region, off the coast of Fremantle, Western Australia were selected. For each habitat, sampling was carried out using a lm wide beam trawl over a distance of 50m at six replicated locations, on three occasions between June and September 2002. Seagrass samples were collected at each location. On each sampling, occasion a 0.025m2 quadrat was used to collect data on leaf area index (LAI), seagrass density and biomass, leaf width and length, and epiphytic algal biomass. MDS ordinations and ANOSIM showed that P. sinuosa habitats contain a significantly different composition of fish species to P. coriacea habitats (with or without H. tasmanica). Species composition was similar in P. coriacea on its own or mixed with H. tasmanica. SIMPER showed that the; differences between P. sinuosa and the P. coriacea habitats reflected the gr~ater abundances of Stigmatopora argus, Siphonognathus radiatus and Scobinichthys granulatus, whereas Stigmatopora nigra was restricted to the P. coriacea habitats only. ANOVA demonstrated that total densities and biomass of fish and species richness were greatest in P. simwsa, while little difference occurred for those variables between the twn P. coriacea habitats. ANOVA indicated that densities of S. argus and Siphamia cephalotes did not differ between habitats, while densities of S. radiatus and S. nigra differed between P. sinuosa and the P. coriacea habitats. Densities of S. granulatus differed only between P. simwsa and P. coriat:ea with H. tasmanica. Seagrass leaf density, leaf area index (LAI), leaf width, dty seagr(lsS biomass and dry epiphytic biomass differed significantly among the three habitats, where as leaf length did not differ between these habitats. Regression analysis indicated that leaf II area index influenced species richn~ss, fish abundance and biomass, while leaf width influenced the abundance of S. argus and S. radiatus, and leaf density influenced the abundances of S. nigra and S. granulatus. BIOENV revealed that leaf width, leaf density and LAI influenced the fish composition in the seagrass meadows. Specific plant features appear to influence the fish assemblages associated with these habitats. Plant morphology also separated size-Classes of an abundant seagrass species supporting the "nursery habitat" theory. Artificial seagrass and live animals were used in laboratory experiments to evaluate habitat preference of the most abundant seagrass-associated fish species in the absence of predators and food, and to determine whether juvenile and/or adult-sized fish exhibit a preference for a particular seagrass morphology, corresponding to those of P. sinuosa, P. coriacea and H. tasmanica. Habitat preference experiments were conducted separately for each size class in three experimental aquaria containing artificial seagrass to simulate three different scagrass habitats. Each aquarium contained two different s:eagrass habitats and ten fish of the same size class. Habitat preference observations were made at hourly intervals over a 10-hour period. Three replicates were conducted for each experiment. The laboratory experiments showed that both juvenile and adult-sized S. argus had a strong preference towards the narrow leaves of P. coriacea and particularly H. tasmanica. However, the preference was morz: pronounced for the juvenile fish. Thus, seagrass morphology, specifically leaf width, appears to play a significant role in the habitat selection of S. argus. However, the ability to avoid predation is equally dependant on their body shape, size and ability to mimic their surroundings. The findings described i.n this study have shown that plant morphology appears to play a significant role in influencing fish faunal assemblages associated with seagrass meadows. The results of this study have clear implications for the environmental management of coastal marine ecosystems, highlighting the need to conserve seagrass meadows of different plant morphology to maintain the biodiversity of the fish assemblages in those regions. Ill ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Although my name is on the cover of this thesis, it's contents would not have been possible without the generous help and support from a number of people. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr Glenn Hyndes, for his vast expert knowledge, supervision, guidance and stress management throughout the project. To my vast anny of volunteers: Catherine Collier, K<lren Crawley, Daniclla Hanf, Rebekah Kenna, Jason How, Alan Kendrick, Brad Stirling and Peter Quintana, tOr their help with field sampling. Without you guys, the project would not have hewn possible. Thanks to my fellow Honours students: Olivier Oldfield, Ruth Rogan, Kirsty Suffel, Simone Vellekoop and all the staff and students at the School ofNatural Sciences for all their advice and comments throughout the project. And last, but definitely not least, thanks to my parents, David and Lyn and brother, Aaron for their support and encouragement throughout the year. Everybody's time, effort and patience were very much appreciated. Cheers. IV TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ..................................................................................... 1 ABSTRACT ............................................................................................ 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................... IV TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................... V LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................... VIII LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................. XIII LIST OF T'ABLES ............................................................................. XIII LIST OF PLATES ............................................................................ XVII LIST OF PLATES ............................................................................ XVII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 1 1.1 THE INFLUENCE OF HABITAT PREFERENCE ON FAUNAL DISTRIBUTION ..................................................................................... ! 1.2 SEAGRASS MEADOWS PRODUCE COMPLEX ECOSYSTEMS.2 1.3 THE FAUNAL ASSEMBLAGES OF SEAGRASS MEADOWS ....... 2 1.4 THE INFLUENCE OF SEAGRASS COMPLEXITY ON FISH ASSEMBLA.GES ..................................................................................... J 1.5 WESTERN AUSTRALIA'S SEAGRASS MEADOWS ...................... S 1.6 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF PROJECT .........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Observations on Some Tasmanian Fishes: Part Ix
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA, VOLUME 94 OBSERVATIONS ON SOME TASMANIAN FISHES: PART IX By E. O. G. SCOTT One text figure ABSTRACT West Coast '. Again, Bridport, Lat. 41 0 01' S., Long. A case of mass mortality in Navodon setosus 147 0 23' E., and st. Helens, Lat. 41 0 20' S., Long. (Waite), 1899 [Aluteridae], a species now first 148 0 14' E., are approximately equidistant-west­ formally recorded from Tasmania, is reported: ward, southward, respectively-from Cape Port­ land; yet the former is a 'North East Coast', the some features of two juveniles are described and 0 figured. Taxonomic data on Mitotichthys tuckeri latter an 'East Coast " town: Stanley, Lat. 40 (Scott), 1942 [Syngnathidae], hitherto known 47' S., Long. 145 0 19' E., which stands in about the only from the holotype, are extended by an account same relation to Cape Grim as Bridport does to of two virtual topotypes. Miscellaneous observations Cape Portland, belongs to the' Far North West '. are made on Stigmatopora argus (Richardson), Entries in tables of synonymy, particularly 1840 [Syngnathidae] (status of several species citations from the earlier authors, are not neces­ commonly reduced to synonymy); Lampris regius sarily identical with the originals in point of typo­ (Bonnaterre), 1788 [Lampridae] (third Tasmanian graphical detail (earlier employment of initial record; dimensions) ; Dactylosargus arctidens capitals for some trivial names; no general, cr (Richardson), 1839 [Aplodactylidae] (differences indescriminate use of parentheses; and so on); from published accounts and figures; general being rendered in a standard pattern in accord observations); Lepidopus caudatus Euphrasen), with contemporary conventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • 2219573-REP-Marine Assessment Report AR
    Appendix L – Marine Assessment GHD | Report for Hunter Water Corporation - Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant, 2219573 Hunter Water Corporation Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant Marine Environment Assessment Amendment Report July 2020 Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and structure of this report .................................................................................... 2 2. Project changes ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Key features of the amended Project .................................................................................. 4 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Review of relevant legislation .............................................................................................. 7 3.2 Review of databases and searches ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Review of previous marine ecology reports ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coulson, P.G., Hall, N.G. and Potter, I.C
    RESEARCH REPOSITORY This is the author’s final version of the work, as accepted for publication following peer review but without the publisher’s layout or pagination. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.03.028 Coulson, P.G., Hall, N.G. and Potter, I.C. (2017) Variations in biological characteristics of temperate gonochoristic species of Platycephalidae and their implications: A review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 190. pp. 50-68. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/36343/ Copyright: © 2017 Elsevier Ltd It is posted here for your personal use. No further distribution is permitted. Accepted Manuscript Variations in biological characteristics of temperate gonochoristic species of Platycephalidae and their implications: A review Peter G. Coulson, Norman G. Hall, Ian C. Potter PII: S0272-7714(16)30774-0 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.03.028 Reference: YECSS 5435 To appear in: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science Received Date: 23 December 2016 Accepted Date: 4 March 2017 Please cite this article as: Coulson, P.G., Hall, N.G., Potter, I.C., Variations in biological characteristics of temperate gonochoristic species of Platycephalidae and their implications: A review, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.03.028. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
    [Show full text]
  • South-East Marine Region Profile
    South-east marine region profile A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region June 2015 © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 South-east marine region profile: A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘South-east marine region profile: A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region, Commonwealth of Australia 2015’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Front cover: Seamount (CSIRO) Back cover: Royal penguin colony at Finch Creek, Macquarie Island (Melinda Brouwer) B / South-east marine region profile South-east marine region profile A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region Contents Figures iv Tables iv Executive Summary 1 The marine environment of the South-east Marine Region 1 Provincial bioregions of the South-east Marine Region 2 Conservation values of the South-east Marine Region 2 Key ecological features 2 Protected species 2 Protected places 2 Human activities and the marine environment 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of the Population Dynamics of Syngnathid Fishes Within Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
    Current Zoology 56 (1): 118−133, 2010 An examination of the population dynamics of syngnathid fishes within Tampa Bay, Florida, USA Heather D. MASONJONES1*, Emily ROSE1,2, Lori Benson McRAE1, Danielle L. DIXSON1,3 1 Biology Department, University of Tampa, Tampa, FL 33606, USA 2 Biology Department, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 3 School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, AU Abstract Seagrass ecosystems worldwide have been declining, leading to a decrease in associated fish populations, especially those with low mobility such as syngnathids (pipefish and seahorses). This two-year pilot study investigated seasonal patterns in density, growth, site fidelity, and population dynamics of Tampa Bay (FL) syngnathid fishes at a site adjacent to two marinas un- der construction. Using a modified mark-recapture technique, fish were collected periodically from three closely located sites that varied in seagrass species (Thalassia spp., Syringodium spp., and mixed-grass sites) and their distance from open water, but had consistent physical/chemical environmental characteristics. Fish were marked, photographed for body size and gender measure- ments, and released the same day at the capture site. Of the 5695 individuals surveyed, 49 individuals were recaptured, indicating a large, flexible population. Population density peaks were observed in July of both years, with low densities in late winter and late summer. Spatially, syngnathid densities were highest closest to the mouth of the bay and lowest near the shoreline. Seven species of syngnathid fishes were observed, and species-specific patterns of seagrass use emerged during the study. However, only two species, Syngnathus scovelli and Hippocampus zosterae, were observed at high frequencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of the Australian Sea Lion (Neophoca Cinerea): an Assessment of Novel DNA-Based and Contemporary Methods to Determine Prey Consumption
    Diet of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea): an assessment of novel DNA-based and contemporary methods to determine prey consumption Kristian John Peters BSc (hons), LaTrobe University, Victoria Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Adelaide (October, 2016) 2 DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name, for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. I acknowledge that copyright of published works contained within this thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Feeding Ecology of Syngnathids Inhabiting Mediterranean Seagrasses
    POPULATION DYNAMICS AND FEEDING ECOLOGY OF SYNGNATHIDS INHABITING MEDITERRANEAN SEAGRASSES JULIA CASTRO FERNÁNDEZ-PACHECO TRABAJO FINAL DE MÁSTER BIOLOGÍA MARINA CURSO 2017/2018 TUTORES: JORGE TERRADOS MUÑOZ INÉS CASTEJÓN SILVO PABLO ARECHAVALA LÓPEZ FECHA DE DEFENSA: 2 DE JULIO DE 2018 - 1 - El Dr. Jorge Terrados Munóz, la Dra. Inés Castejón Silvo y el Dr. Pablo Arechavala López, investigadores del Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados (IMEDEA –CSIC/UIB), y co-tutores del Trabajo de Fin de Máster de la alumna Julia Castro Fernández-Pacheco (DNI: 51489996B ), HACEN CONSTAR: Que la alumna ha realizado satisfactoriamente su Trabajo de Fin de Máster, el cual está finalizado, evaluado y listo para su presentación y defensa en la convocatoria de Julio del 2018 en el Máster Interuniversitario en Biología Marina (Facultades de Biología de Galicia). Para que conste a efectos oportunos, firman en Esporles el 20 de Junio de 2018. Firmado digitalmente por CASTEJON SILVO Firmado por ARECHAVALA LOPEZ Firmado por TERRADOS INES - 51088754G PABLO - 09034684P el día MUÑOZ JORGE MIGUEL - Fecha: 2018.06.19 19/06/2018 con un certificado emitido por AC FNMT Usuarios 27431617T el día 16:03:16 +02'00' 20/06/2018 con un Dr. Jorge Terrados Muñoz Dra. Inés Castejón Silvo Dr. Pablo Arechavala López Firmado digitalmente por DOMINGUE DOMINGUEZ CONDE JESUS - 36046949S Nombre de reconocimiento (DN): Z CONDE c=ES, serialNumber=IDCES-36046949S, C/ MIQUEL MARQUÉS, 21 givenName=JESUS, 07190 ESPORLES JESUS - sn=DOMINGUEZ CONDE, ILLES BALEARS cn=DOMINGUEZ CONDE JESUS - TELF. 971 611 716 36046949S FAX 971 611 761 36046949S Fecha: 2018.06.22 12:24:51 +02'00' INDEX ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................- 2 - INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Metabarcoding for Diet Analysis and Biodiversity: a Case Study Using the Endangered Australian Sea Lion (Neophoca Cinerea)
    Received: 20 December 2016 | Revised: 12 April 2017 | Accepted: 8 May 2017 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3123 ORIGINAL RESEARCH DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis and biodiversity: A case study using the endangered Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) Tina E. Berry1 | Sylvia K. Osterrieder2 | Dáithí C. Murray1 | Megan L. Coghlan1 | Anthony J. Richardson3 | Alicia K. Grealy1 | Michael Stat1 | Lars Bejder4 | Michael Bunce1 1Trace and Environmental DNA (TrEnD) Laboratory, Department of Environment and Abstract Agriculture, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, The analysis of apex predator diet has the ability to deliver valuable insights into eco- Australia system health, and the potential impacts a predator might have on commercially rel- 2Centre for Marine Science and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, evant species. The Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) is an endemic apex predator Australia and one of the world’s most endangered pinnipeds. Given that prey availability is vital 3CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, EcoSciences to the survival of top predators, this study set out to understand what dietary infor- Precinct, Dutton Park, Qld, Australia 4Cetacean Research Unit, Murdoch University, mation DNA metabarcoding could yield from 36 sea lion scats collected across Murdoch, WA, Australia 1,500 km of its distribution in southwest Western Australia. A combination of PCR Correspondence assays were designed to target a variety of potential sea lion prey, including mammals, Michael Bunce, Trace and Environmental fish, crustaceans, cephalopods, and birds. Over 1.2 million metabarcodes identified DNA (TrEnD) Laboratory, Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin six classes from three phyla, together representing over 80 taxa. The results confirm University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Nektonic Assemblages Determined from Baited Underwater Video in Protected Versus Unprotected Shallow Seagrass Meadows on Kangaroo Island, South Australia
    Vol. 503: 205–218, 2014 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published April 29 doi: 10.3354/meps10733 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Nektonic assemblages determined from baited underwater video in protected versus unprotected shallow seagrass meadows on Kangaroo Island, South Australia Sasha K. Whitmarsh1,*, Peter G. Fairweather1, Daniel J. Brock2, David Miller3 1School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia 2Coast and Marine Program, Kangaroo Island Natural Resources Management Board, 35 Dauncey Street, Kingscote, Kangaroo Island, South Australia 5223, Australia 3Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, 1 Richmond Road, Keswick, South Australia 5035, Australia ABSTRACT: As the number of marine protected areas grows worldwide, it is important to under- stand how existing protected areas have functioned. Baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) are becoming a widely used technique for monitoring reef fish, but with few studies hav- ing so far used BRUVS in seagrass meadows, it remains unclear how they perform within these habitats. The aims of this study were to trial the use of BRUVS in shallow seagrass habitats and to compare animals observed at Pelican Lagoon Aquatic Reserve to 2 broadly similar locations on Kangaroo Island that have had no protection. BRUVS identified 47 distinguishable taxa from 5 phyla, with the majority (79%) of those being fishes. Assemblages taking into account relative abundances were not significantly different between protected and unprotected areas; however, species compositions alone varied significantly across all 3 locations. Only 2 out of 18 commer- cially and/or recreationally targeted species had a higher abundance within the reserve. Overall, BRUVS were found to be suitable for use in seagrass habitats; however, some limitations (particu- larly the potential for obstruction of the camera by seagrass blades) may exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C-10 Invert Solutions SRE Report 2020.Pdf (PDF
    Survey for Short Range Endemic Fauna for the MRC Graphite Project, Munglinup, Western Australia. Report by Invertebrate Solutions Pty Ltd for MRCG Graphite Ltd October 2020 Dr Timothy Moulds Director and Principal Ecologist Invertebrate Solutions Pty Ltd PO Box 14 Victoria Park, WA 6979 Australia [email protected] www.invertebratesolutions.com Invertebrate Solutions. (2020). Survey for Short Range Endemic Fauna for the MRC Graphite Project, Munglinup, Western Australia. Unpublished report to MRC Graphite Ltd, October 2020. Report Number 2019ISJ08_F04_20201020 Prepared for: MRC Graphite Ltd Frontispiece: Mygalomorph spider Aname sp.’munglinup-DNA’ disturbed from her burrow Image Copyright Invertebrate Solutions 2020. COPYRIGHT: This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified above, and no representation is made to any third party. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belongs to Invertebrate Solutions and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Invertebrate Solutions. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Invertebrate Solutions. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ vi 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Fauna Assessment.Pdf
    APPENDIX H BORR North and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment (Biota, 2019) Bunbury Outer Ring Road Northern and Central Section Targeted Fauna Assessment Prepared for GHD December 2019 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2020 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 1463 Prepared by: V. Ford, R. Teale J. Keen, J. King Document Quality Checking History Version: Rev A Peer review: S. Ford Director review: M. Maier Format review: S. Schmidt, M. Maier Approved for issue: M. Maier This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx 3 BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna 4 Cube:Current:1463 (BORR North Central Re-survey):Documents:1463 Northern and Central Fauna ARI_Rev0.docx BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna BORR Northern and Central Section Fauna Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 9 1.1 Introduction 9 1.2 Methods
    [Show full text]