Politics and Political Culture in France, 1737-1794

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Politics and Political Culture in France, 1737-1794 William S. Cormack. Revolution and Political Conflict in the French Navy, 1789-1794. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. xiii + 343 pp. $59.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-521-47209-8. John Hardman. French Politics 1774-1789: From the Accession of Louis XVI to the Fall of the Bastille. New York and London: Longman, 1995. x + 283 pp. $29.58, paper, ISBN 978-0-582-23649-3. John Rogister. Louis XV and the Parlement of Paris, 1737-1755. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. xxv + 288 pp. $69.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-521-40395-5. Julian Swann. Politics and the Parlement of Paris under Louis XV, 1754-1774. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. x + 390 pp. $41.99, paper, ISBN 978-0-521-48362-9. Reviewed by Kenneth Margerison Published on H-France (September, 1997) H-Net Reviews For the last decade and a half historians have Three of the four authors--John Rogister, Ju‐ been industriously ploughing the fertile feld of lian Swann, and John Hardman--whose books are eighteenth-century French political culture.[1] under review in this essay concentrate on aspects The emphasis in this endeavor has been on ideol‐ of the political history of Old Regime France, and ogy and the language that expresses it. Historians all three either directly or indirectly argue that of political culture have identified and analyzed political culture provides no valid insight into the the various discourses developed during the sec‐ political history of France. In fact these historians, ond half of the century in an effort to understand all of whom make extensive use of archival better the underlying bases of the political activity sources, argue that Old Regime political activity in this period. Discourse, as viewed by these histo‐ took place entirely apart from the public sphere. rians, provided the means by which political op‐ Politics in this period, according to these analyses, ponents battled each other in the public sphere in was practiced behind closed doors in the king's hopes of winning the approval of public opinion. chateau at Versailles or within the hidden recess‐ According to Keith Baker, one of the most notable es of the Palais de justice in Paris. Politics was the scholars of this phenomenon, political power it‐ work of the king's ministers, magistrates, and, self rested with those who controlled the language sometimes, his courtiers, mistresses, and wife. Po‐ of politics. Historians who accept the legitimacy of litical disputes were not public affairs, and public the concept of political culture assume that politi‐ opinion mattered little in the decisions reached in cal activity takes place within the framework of a the halls of power. Thus, by its very nature poli‐ variety of competing political languages.[2] tics could have nothing to do with discourse or Could politics actually have been practiced in ideology. If a political language was developed this fashion in Old Regime France with its abso‐ and propagated among the public, it had no effect lute monarchy, the absence of a nationally elected on political decisions or the implementation of representative body, and restrictions on the free‐ those decisions. Even in those instances where it dom of speech and press? Even after 1789 when might appear that ideological considerations or representative institutions and free communica‐ public opinion had influenced a political outcome, tions were in place, were politics actually shaped some deeply hidden motive or secret activity by political culture rather than personal relation‐ could be discovered to provide a more convincing ships, rivalries, and ambitions? Traditional politi‐ rationale for a particular political result. Concen‐ cal and social historians, accustomed to working trating on revolutionary France, William S. Cor‐ with archival materials, may remain a bit uneasy mack, the fourth author, interprets political activi‐ about conclusions regarding political activity ty quite differently. Largely basing his study on drawn from the publications of individuals who archival research, Cormack, nevertheless, argues were not themselves in positions of authority. Did that revolutionary politics must be understood as the language of these publications really repre‐ part of a society-wide political culture. Thus all sent the positions of the parlements or the min‐ four authors raise, from different perspectives, istry, and, if so, did they have any bearing on po‐ the issue of the value of political culture as an an‐ litical practice or outcome? One might even legiti‐ alytical tool for better understanding the politics mately ask if historians of political culture do not of eighteenth-century France. merely study words instead of a political reality Politics in mid-eighteenth-century France, ac‐ which can only be recovered by empirical re‐ cording to John Rogister, was confined to the search on individuals and the events and situa‐ tightly restricted world of Louis XV, his ministers, tions of their political lives. the upper clergy, and the magistrates in the pre‐ eminent court of the realm, the Parlement of 2 H-Net Reviews Paris. What specifically interests Rogister are the magistrates ultimately led to the exile of the Par‐ relationships between important ministers and lement in 1753-1754, to the arrest of its least tem‐ the parlementary leaders which provide the key, perate members, and to its replacement by the he believes, to understanding the nature of the Chambre royale du Louvre. Rogister argues that great political dispute of the 1750s, the refusal of Louis, with the encouragement of the prince de sacraments affair. These relationships were col‐ Conti, also played an active personal role in the ored by the internal workings of both the king's resolution of the crisis by making overtures to councils and the Parlement of Paris as well as by Maupeou and drafting the Law of Silence on Uni‐ the political alliances and rivalries that existed genitus. within both bodies. Having undertaken an ex‐ For all of the detail provided on the various haustive examination of the archival evidence rel‐ political maneuvers surrounding this affair, Ro‐ evant to his subject--much of which resides in pri‐ gister's study has some strange omissions. The vate family collections scattered across France-- parti janseniste, for instance, hardly appears in the author has acquired an intimate knowledge of the narrative of events. There are indeed radical the important personalities and the day-to-day op‐ magistrates, identified as zeles, but Rogister eration of the king's government. makes clear that these are not all Jansenists. After The major focus of the volume is the denial of a brief description of Jansenism and the nature of sacraments affair which began in 1752 when the the Bull Unigenitus, the account proceeds as if the archbishop of Paris, Christophe de Beaumont, be‐ refusal of sacraments issue had virtually no con‐ gan enforcing a policy of refusing the sacraments nection to the Jansenist attack on this papal pro‐ to dying clergy and members of religious orders nouncement. The Grand Remonstrances were who refused to accept the Bull Unigenitus, the pa‐ drafted by Jansenist partisans including the abbe pal condemnation of Jansenist principles issued in Mey, the author of Apologie de tous les jugements, 1713. The intervention of the Parlement of Paris, a major contribution to Jansenist political theory. designed to prevent the implementation of this Rogister mentions the authors, but says little policy, ultimately led to bitter and acrimonious re‐ about their motivations and nothing about their lations between Louis XV and the magistrates of Jansenist convictions. In describing the impor‐ the court. Rogister describes in great detail how tance of the remonstrances for the concept of the this situation ultimately degenerated into open Fundamental Laws, he makes no references to the political hostilities. The actions of the Parlement Jansenist influence on this argument. were to a large extent the result of First President Rogister's view of politics in the eighteenth Rene Charles de Maupeou's belief that the govern‐ century is one of secret transactions within a ment was trying to undercut his authority. When closed circle of influential men, whereas much of the Parlement decided to draft remonstrances in the Jansenist program had been developed in the January 1753, Maupeou refused to play a role in public sphere by numerous Jansenist theoreti‐ the process, thus leaving the way open for more cians. The Grand Remonstrances would seem to radical elements among the magistrates to influ‐ be an example of the point of convergence be‐ ence the document's form (p. 163). The resulting tween public and non-public political activity. Ap‐ Grand Remonstrances of 3 April 1753 made par‐ parently refusing to consider the possibility that ticular claims for the Fundamental Laws of the the magistrates might have found some of the realm including an insistence on the rule of law Jansenist-inspired political language appealing, and the requirement of the sovereign to obey this Rogister provides no convincing explanation as to law. Louis XV's refusal to accept the remon‐ why the entire Parlement accepted such a docu‐ strances and the subsequent judicial strike by the 3 H-Net Reviews ment outside of Maupeou's refusal to take a hand of this episode cannot blithely ignore the in its drafting and difficulties among the four Jansenist influence on the actions of the magis‐ commissioners charged with the task. Surely the trates. Yet Rogister appears to be determined to magistrates did not adopt the Grand Remon‐ demonstrate that the entire history of the rela‐ strances simply because the traditional discipline tionship between the Parlement of Paris and imposed on them by their leadership had broken Louis XV can be understood through the political down. maneuvers of the ministers and the most impor‐ Rogister is equally disdainful of that other pil‐ tant magistrates.
Recommended publications
  • Index Librorum Prohibitorum, 1949
    INDEX LIBRORVM PROHIBITORVM -- 1948 Autor Titulo Ano Vide Historia de vita Henrici IIII imp et Hiltebrandi 0 Helmoldus. Chronica Slavorum pont max cognomento Gregorii VII Arringa filosofica 0 Ordine (Tutto è) Système social ou principes naturels de la morale 0 D'Holbach, Paul Thyry et de la politique avec un examen de l'influence du gouvernement sur les moeurs. 18 aug. 1775 Theologia mystica a pio quodam ordinis 0 Theologia germanica dominorum teutonicorum sacerdote, ducentis circiter abhinc annis germanice conscripta et a Ioanne Theophilo in latinum translata Manuel biblique ou Cours d'Écriture Sainte à 0 l'usage des Séminaires [et] "Ancien Testament", quatorzième édition revue par A. Brassac, etc., avec la collaboration de J. Ducher. Tome premier, etc., Paris 191 Système 0 Sistème Catechismus 0 Katechismus Manuel biblique ou Cours d'Écriture Sainte à 0 l'usage des Séminaires [et] Tome deuxième, etc., Paris 192 Autor Titulo Ano Vide Paraleipomena rerum memorabilium a Friderico II 0 Conradus a Liechtenaw. Chronicon usque ad Carolum V Manuel biblique ou Cours d'Écriture Sainte à 0 l'usage des Séminaires [et] Tome troisième: "Nouveau Testament", par A. Brassac, etc., treizième édition, etc., Paris 1910. Tome quatrième: "Nouveau Testament", par A. Brassac, etc., treizième édition, Paris 191 Manuel biblique ou Cours d'Écriture Sainte à 0 l'usage des Séminaires [et] Tome troisième: "Nouveau Testament", par A. Brassac, etc., douzième édition totalement refondue, Paris 1907. Tome quatrième: "Nouveau Testament", par A. Brassac, etc., douzième édition, Paris 190 Manuel biblique ou Cours d'Écriture Sainte à 0 Vigouroux, Bacuez et Brassac l'usage des Séminaires Corriere (Il) europeo 0 Spione (Lo) italiano Ricerche religiose 0 Buonaiuti, Ernesto Défense 0 Déffense Divorzio (Il) celeste 0 Pallavicino, Ferrante Instruzione 0 Istruzione Uomo (L'), trattato fisico-morale 0 Gorini, Giuseppe Corio État 0 Estat Traduzione dal francese dell'Analisi e 0 Analisi e confutazione confutazione succinta della bolla del s.p.
    [Show full text]
  • Download The
    A DECADE GF LITERARY CRITICISM IN THE MEMOIRES SECRETS OF BACHAUMONT (1762-1771) by MARJORIE ELSIE ALMSTROM B.A., University of British Columbia, 1937 B.Ed., University of British Columbia, 1943 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of The Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of FRENCH We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, 1968 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his represen• tatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Marjorie E. Almstrom Department nf French The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date September 6, 1968 ABSTRACT Almost two centuries have passed since the publication began, in 1777» of the Memoires secrets de Bachaumont. This journal, regarded by many as the mirror of its age, was the outgrowth of a unique and highly successful experiment in group journalism undertaken by the cultured and aristocratic members of an almost-forgotten salon, the paroisse of Madame Doublet. Despite its acknowledged value to students of the Ancien Regime, few studies have been made of this lengthy and complex work. This thesis examines a limited aspect of the Memoires secrets: the literary criticism found in the first five of the thirty-six volumes together with that in the corresponding supplements for the years 1762-1771.
    [Show full text]
  • Aproximación Al Concepto De Virtud En El Pensamiento De Jean-Jacques Rousseau
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Digital de Tesis PUCP PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DEL PERÚ ESCUELA DE POSGRADO APROXIMACIÓN AL CONCEPTO DE VIRTUD EN EL PENSAMIENTO DE JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU Tesis para optar por el grado de Magíster en Filosofía presentada por: VÍCTOR ANDRÉS MONTERO CAM Asesor: Dr. Ciro Alegría Varona Miembros del Jurado: Dr. Ciro Alegría Varona Mg. Levy del Águila Marchena Mg. Adriana Añi Montoya Lima – Perú 2011 1 «Quiero decir la verdad, y la diré en la forma que le es conveniente».1 (Confesiones) «El hombre ha nacido libre, sin embargo, por todas partes se encuentra encadenado».2 (Contrato Social) 1 «Je vais dire la vérité, et je la dirai du ton qui lui convient». OC, III, 473. 2 “L´homme est né libre, et cependant partout il est dans les fers”. OC, III, 289: Du contract social (1e version), Ch. III, Du Pacte Fondamental. 2 INDICE RESUMEN 1 ABREVIATURAS DE OBRAS CITADAS DE ROUSSEAU 2 INTRODUCCIÓN 3 CAPÍTULO I LA ESFERA MORAL 10 1.1. La reflexión moral en Rousseau 10 1.1.1. La dignidad humana 13 1.1.2. Frugalidad e inocencia 16 1.1.2.1. Frugalidad 16 1.1.2.2. Inocencia 17 1.1.3. Reivindicación moral de la ignorancia 20 1.1.4. Elogio a la vida sencilla, útil y autosuficiente en el campo 24 1.1.5. La libertad como condición esencialmente humana 27 1.2. La “religión de la sinceridad” 41 1.2.1. El lenguaje de la virtud y el entusiasmo por la verdad 41 1.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Contraception and the Renaissance of Traditional Marriage
    CHOOSING A LAW TO LIVE BY ONCE THE KING IS GONE INTRODUCTION Law is the expression of the rules by which civilization governs itself, and it must be that in law as elsewhere will be found the fundamental differences of peoples. Here then it may be that we find the underlying cause of the difference between the civil law and the common law.1 By virtue of its origin, the American legal profession has always been influenced by sources of law outside the United States. American law schools teach students the common law, and law students come to understand that the common law is different than the civil law, which is prevalent in Europe.2 Comparative law courses expose law students to the civil law system by comparing American common law with the law of other countries such as France, which has a civil code.3 A closer look at the history of the American and French Revolutions makes one wonder why the legal systems of the two countries are so different. Certainly, the American and French Revolutions were drastically different in some ways. For instance, the French Revolution was notoriously violent during a period known as “the Terror.”4 Accounts of the French revolutionary government executing so many French citizens as well as the creation of the Cult of the Supreme Being5 make the French Revolution a stark contrast to the American Revolution. Despite the differences, the revolutionary French and Americans shared similar goals—liberty and equality for all citizens and an end to tyranny. Both revolutions happened within approximately two decades of each other and were heavily influenced by the Enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • France: the Revolt of Democratic Christianity and the Rise of Public Opinion
    The Enlightenment and religion 4 France: the revolt of democratic Christianity and the rise of public opinion This chapter focuses on the emergence of religious toleration in France and the degree to which it was brought about by broad po- litico-religious struggle rather than by the philosophes.1 The discus- sion will, therefore, not provide the usual Enlightenment studies degree of focus upon the philosophes. Much of the research neces- sary for a revision of the role of the philosophes in France has been accumulating for several decades, but there has not yet been an at- tempt to bring together the various strands and integrate them into a critique of their role. Albeit slowly, from the mid 1960s a revision of the status of Pierre Bayle as a Calvinist fideist (discussed in earlier chapters) rather than an early philosophe has gradually gained ac- ceptance.2 Again rather slowly and mostly from the 1980s, there have been efforts to demonstrate that Christianity occupied a more important place in the development of the French Enlightenment than had hitherto been accepted.3 In particular there has been in- creased recognition of the role of Jansenism, especially in the land- mark suppression of the Jesuits.4 Much of the tale I recount in this chapter is, therefore, already well-known and I am indebted to the research of a number of scholars (some of whom have already been cited in earlier chapters) including R. Barny, C. J. Betts, P. R. Campbell, A. Kors, P. J. Korshin, Elizabeth Labrousse, M. Linton, J. McManners, W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Revolt: an Affirmation Or Denial Ofopular P Sovereignty?
    Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS College of Liberal Arts & Sciences 9-1992 The Federalist Revolt: An Affirmation or Denial ofopular P Sovereignty? Paul R, Hanson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers Part of the European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Hanson, Paul, R."The Federalist Revolt: An Affirmation or Denial of Popular Sovereignty?" French History, vol. 6, no. 3 (September, 1992), 335-355. Available from: digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/500/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Monarchist Clubs and the Pamphlet Debate over Political Legitimacy in the Early Years of the French Revolution Paul R. Hanson Paul R. Hanson is professor and chair of history at Butler University. He is currently working on a book- length study of the Federalist revolt of 1793. Research for this article was supported by a summer grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities and by assistance from Butler University. Earlier versions were presented at annual meetings of the Society for French Historical Studies. The author would like to thank Gary Kates, Ken Margerison, Colin Jones, Jeremy Popkin, Michael Kennedy, Jack Censer, Jeffrey Ravel, John Burney, and the anonymous readers for the journal for their helpful comments on various drafts of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution a Volume in the DOCUMENTARY HISTORY of WESTERN CIVILIZATION - the French Revolution
    The French Revolution A volume In THE DOCUMENTARY HISTORY of WESTERN CIVILIZATION - The French Revolution Edited by PAUL H. BEIK PALGRA VE MACMILLAN ISBN 978-1-349-00528-4 ISBN 978-1-349-00526-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-00526-0 THE FRENCH REVOLUTION English translation copyright © 1970 by Paul H. Beik Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1970 978-0-333-07911-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. First published in the United States 1970 First published in the United Kingdom by The Macmillan Press Ltd. 1971 Published by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Associated companies in New York Toronto Dublin Melbourne Johannesburg and Madras SBN 333 07911 6 Contents Introduction x PART I. CROWN, PARLEMENT, AND ARISTOCRACY 1. November 19, 1787: Chretien Fran~ois de Lamoignon on Principles of the French Monarchy 1 2. April 17, 1788: Louis XVI to a Deputation from the Parlement of Paris 3 3. May 4, 1788: Repeated Remonstrances of the Parlement of Paris in Response to the King's Statement of April 17 5 4. December 12,1788: Memoir of the Princes 10 PART II. THE SURGE OF OPINION 5. January, 1789: Sieyes, What Is the Third Estate? 16 6. February, 1789: Mounier on the Estates General 37 7. March 1, 1789: Parish Cahiers of Ecommoy and Mansigne 45 8. March 14, 1789: Cahier of the Nobility of Crepy 51 9. March 26,1789: Cahier of the Clergy of Troyes 56 PART III.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty
    Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty Author: Rebecca Clark Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:103616 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2012 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Department of Political Science MONTESQUIEU ON THE HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY OF POLITICAL LIBERTY A dissertation by REBECCA RUDMAN CLARK submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 © Copyright by REBECCA RUDMAN CLARK 2012 Abstract Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty Rebecca R. Clark Dissertation Advisor: Christopher Kelly Montesquieu famously presents climate and terrain as enabling servitude in hot, fertile climes and on the exposed steppes of central Asia. He also traces England’s exemplary constitution, with its balanced constitution, independent judiciary, and gentle criminal practices, to the unique conditions of early medieval northern Europe. The English “found” their government “in the forests” of Germany. There, the marginal, variegated terrain favored the dispersion of political power, and a pastoral way of life until well into the Middle Ages. In pursuing a primitive honor unrelated to political liberty as such, the barbaric Franks accidentally established the rudiments of the most “well-tempered” government. His turn to these causes accidental to human purposes in Parts 3-6 begins with his analysis of the problem of unintended consequences in the history of political reform in Parts 1-2. While the idea of balancing political powers in order to prevent any one individual or group from dominating the rest has ancient roots, he shows that it has taken many centuries to understand just what needs to be balanced, and to learn to balance against one threat without inviting another.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiestas and Fervor: Religious Life and Catholic Enlightenment in the Diocese of Barcelona, 1766-1775
    FIESTAS AND FERVOR: RELIGIOUS LIFE AND CATHOLIC ENLIGHTENMENT IN THE DIOCESE OF BARCELONA, 1766-1775 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrea J. Smidt, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2006 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Dale K. Van Kley, Adviser Professor N. Geoffrey Parker Professor Kenneth J. Andrien ____________________ Adviser History Graduate Program ABSTRACT The Enlightenment, or the "Age of Reason," had a profound impact on eighteenth-century Europe, especially on its religion, producing both outright atheism and powerful movements of religious reform within the Church. The former—culminating in the French Revolution—has attracted many scholars; the latter has been relatively neglected. By looking at "enlightened" attempts to reform popular religious practices in Spain, my project examines the religious fervor of people whose story usually escapes historical attention. "Fiestas and Fervor" reveals the capacity of the Enlightenment to reform the Catholicism of ordinary Spaniards, examining how enlightened or Reform Catholicism affected popular piety in the diocese of Barcelona. This study focuses on the efforts of an exceptional figure of Reform Catholicism and Enlightenment Spain—Josep Climent i Avinent, Bishop of Barcelona from 1766- 1775. The program of “Enlightenment” as sponsored by the Spanish monarchy was one that did not question the Catholic faith and that championed economic progress and the advancement of the sciences, primarily benefiting the elite of Spanish society. In this context, Climent is noteworthy not only because his idea of “Catholic Enlightenment” opposed that sponsored by the Spanish monarchy but also because his was one that implicitly condemned the present hierarchy of the Catholic Church and explicitly ii advocated popular enlightenment and the creation of a more independent “public sphere” in Spain by means of increased literacy and education of the masses.
    [Show full text]
  • Cas Pratique
    Cas pratique Cours : Droit constitutionnel 1 : Théorie générale de l’Etat - Histoire constitutionnelle de la France Enoncé : Il s'agit d’étudier l'ensemble de la période 1788-1815, et de dégager les grands principes constitutionnels alors en vigueur ou en devenir. Question 1 : L’Ancien Régime Réponse 1 : Sous l'Ancien Régime, parce qu'elle est de droit divin, la monarchie est absolue. Réponse fausse Commentaire : En fait, le caractère absolutiste et le fondement religieux de la monarchie française d'avant 1789 sont deux notions distinctes et indépendantes l'une de l'autre. Toutefois dans les faits, le fondement de droit divin favorise l'absolutisme. En effet, la monarchie française est dite absolue parce que le monarque concentre tous les pouvoirs (législation, justice, etc.) dans ses mains, et ses pouvoirs se connaissent pas de limites. Au contraire, à la même époque, la monarchie anglaise a déjà fait sa mutation et est déjà une monarchie limitée, une monarchie constitutionnelle. Par ailleurs, la monarchie française est alors de droit divin, c'est à dire que le monarque détient son pouvoir de dieu. L'origine divine du pouvoir royal est symbolisée par le sacre du roi à Reims. Cela signifie également qu'il n'est responsable, dirait-on aujourd'hui, que devant dieu. La Révolution française mit fin à ces deux caractéristiques. Réponse 2 : Les lois fondamentales du Royaume désignent la constitution s'appliquant sous l'Ancien Régime. Réponse juste Commentaire : Sous l'Ancien Régime, il n'existe pas de constitution écrite (comme l'inventa ensuite la Révolution française) mais des règles coutumières, par ailleurs incomplètes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Financial Crisis That Contributed to the French Revolution by Walter S
    The Financial Crisis that Contributed to the French Revolution By Walter S. Zapotoczny Jr. “The revolution that was to sweep away the political institutions of France did not begin on 14 July 1789,” writes William Doyle in Origins of the French Revolution. On 20 August 1786 the comptroller-general of the royal finances, Charles-Alexandre de Calonne, went to King Louis XVI and informed him that France was on the brink of financial collapse. According to Calonne, the 1786 deficit would be 112 million livres (currency of France until 1795). This represented about a quarter of the annual revenue of France. When Louis XVI had come to power in 1774 the deficit had been 40 million, and had even fallen over the next two years. Since 1777, however, the deficit had risen steadily, largely due to an enormous rise in state borrowing and consequently in the annual interest and repayments that the treasury was obligated to disburse. While costs associated with the upkeep of King Louis XVI’s extravagant palace at Versailles and the frivolous spending of the queen, Marie Antoinette were high approximately 5 percent of public expenditures in 1788, the main reason for the overload of the government was the cost of war. In 1774, Louis XVI appointed Jacques Turgot to be the comptroller-general of the royal finances. Turgot believed that subsidies, regulations, and tariffs were crippling productivity and enterprise in France. He advised the king to end them, believing that business would thrive and revenues would increase. He proposed an ambitious reform program that included taking down internal custom barriers, lifting price controls on grain, abolishing the guilds and the forced labor service, and giving political power to newly created provincial assemblies.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Name: HIST 4 Title: History of Western Civilization Units
    Course Name: HIST 4 Title: History of Western Civilization Units: 3 Course Description: This course is a survey of western civilization from the Renaissance to the present, emphasizing the interplay of social, political, economic, cultural, and intellectual forces in creating and shaping the modern world. The focus is on the process of modernization, stressing the secularization of western society and examining how war and revolution have served to create our world. Course Objectives: Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to: identify and correctly use basic historical terminology distinguish between primary and secondary sources as historical evidence compare and evaluate various interpretations used by historians to explain the development of western civilization since the Renaissance evaluate multiple causes and analyze why a historical event happened identify the major eras and relevant geography of western civilization since the Renaissance evaluate major economic, social, political, and cultural developments in western civilization since the Renaissance evaluate the experiences, conflicts, and connections of diverse groups of people in western civilization since the Renaissance draw historical generalizations about western civilization since the Renaissance based on understanding of the historical evidence describe and evaluate the major movements and historical forces that have contributed to the development of western civilization. Course Content: 4 hours: Introduction to the Study of Western Civilization, Historiography; Age of Transition: The Early Modern Period. 3 hours: The Nature and Structure of Medieval Society; those who work, those who pray, those who fight, the Great Chain of Being, manorialism; Decline of the Medieval Synthesis; The Renaissance and the Question of Modernity: humanism, individualism, secular spirit, Petrarch, Bruni, Pico, Castiglione, Machiavelli, etc., literature, art, and politics.
    [Show full text]