DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

City of San Marino Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Approved February 13, 2019 City of San Marino Local Hazards Mitigation Plan – Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................. ES-1 Section 1: Introduction .......................................................................................... I-1 Section 2: Community Profile ..................................................................................... 2-1 Section 3: Risk Assessment ......................................................................................... 3-1 Section 4: Multi-Hazard Goals and Action Items ..................................................... 4-1 Section 5: LHMP Maintenance ................................................................................... 5-1 Section 6: Earthquake ................................................................................................. 6-1 Section 7: Flood ............................................................................................................ 7-1 Section 8: Landslide ..................................................................................................... 8-1 Section 9: Wildfires ...................................................................................................... 9-1 Section 10: Windstorm .............................................................................................. 10-1 Section 11: Manmade Hazards ................................................................................. 11-1 Appendix A: LHMP Resources ................................................................................. A-1 Appendix B: Public Participation ............................................................................. B-1 Appendix C: Benefit Cost Analysis ........................................................................... C-1 Appendix D: List of Acronyms .................................................................................. D-1 Appendix E: Glossary................................................................................................. E-1 Appendix F: California Disasters ...............................................................................F-1 Appendix G: Dams....................................................................................................... G-1 Appendix H: Maps and Charts: ................................................................................. H-1 Appendix I: References ............................................................................................... I-1 Appendix J: Existing Authorities, Policies, Programs, Resources, Planning and Regulations .................................................................... J-1 Section K: LHMP Adoption....................................................................................... K-1 i City of San Marino Local Hazards Mitigation Plan – Table of Contents This Page is Intentionally Left Blank ii City of San Marino Local Hazards Mitigation Plan – Executive Summary Executive Summary: The City of San Marino Local Hazards Mitigation Plan (LHMP) includes resources and information to assist San Marino residents, public and private sector organizations, and others interested in participating in planning for natural and manmade hazards. The LHMP provides a list of activities that may assist in reducing risk and preventing loss from future disastrous events. The action items address multi-hazard issues, as well as specific activities for earthquakes, floods, wind storms, landslides, wildfires, and manmade hazards. The primary objective of the mitigation plan is to reduce the negative impacts of future disasters on San Marino: to save lives and reduce injuries, minimize damage to buildings and infrastructure (especially critical facilities) and minimize economic losses. This LHMP is an educational and planning document, not a regulatory document. This mitigation plan meets FEMA’s planning requirements for addressing hazards, vulnerability and risk. Adoption of this mitigation plan is required for San Marino to remain eligible for future FEMA mitigation grant funds and reimbursement of disaster related expenses. The Coordinating Body and authors of the LHMP understand the importance of documentation of attendance at Public Outreach meetings. State OES and FEMA reviewers should note that attendance was recorded rather than use sign-in sheets. For example, On June 14, 2017, there was a City Council Meeting held in which the LHMP was discussed and that the public was able to attend. Attendance at this meeting was officially recorded by the City Clerk which is standard practice. At another public meeting held October 24, 2017, the list of four attendees was documented by the consultant. The names of individuals attending public meetings is documented in Appendix B of this plan. LHMP Organization The LHMP contains background on the purpose and methodology used to develop the LHMP, a profile of San Marino, sections on six hazards that occur within the City, and supporting appendices. Development of the LHMP 1 The City of San Marino 2018 Local Hazards Mitigation Plan is the result of a collaborative effort between the City of San Marino, local stakeholders and the public. This LHMP is also a culmination of draft plans developed over time by of three City fire chiefs. The City’s 2011 LHMP was completed by former Fire Chief Jim Frawley. 1 Regulation 44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans – Regulation Checklist Element A: Planning Process A1(a) ES - 1 City of San Marino Local Hazards Mitigation Plan – Executive Summary After accepting a position as Fire Chief with the City of Santa Cruz, responsibility for the LHMP was assigned to Deputy Fire Chief Mark Phillips. In January 2016, Mario Rueda was appointed as the City’s San Marino Fire Chief responsible for the City’s emergency management program and the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Fire Chief Mario Rueda of the San Marino Fire Department served as the Project Manager for the LHMP planning process. His responsibilities included providing information on hazards, mitigation actions and communicating with the City Manager, Elected Officials, City Department Heads, the Los Angeles County Area C Coordinator, representatives from the San Marino Unified School District and other community stakeholders. In July of 2017, Laura D. Hernandez of Soteria Emergency Management Consulting Services was hired to update the 2011 LHMP. Ms. Hernandez met several times with Fire Captain Jason Sutliff and regularly with Chief Rueda. She also interviewed and communicated with local stakeholders. Chief Rueda worked closely with HMGP Consultant Laura Hernandez to provide LHMP updates, liaison with City’s Hazard Mitigation Advisory Committee, advise on status of hazard mitigation planning projects, and oversee overall planning process. San Marino LHMP Planning Team2 Supporting documentation reflecting this process and communications with community stakeholders and the public is contained in Appendix B of the LHMP. The City’s LHMP Advisory Committee consisted of the following members: • Fire Chief Mario Rueda, San Marino Fire Department • Captain Jason Sutliff, San Marino Fire Department • Laura D. Hernandez, Soteria Emergency Management Services Other City representatives involved in the development of the LHMP included: • San Marino Interim City Manager Cindy Collins • San Marino Police Chief John N. Incontro • San Marino Planning and Building Director Aldo Cervantes • San Marino Public Works Director Michael Throne, PE 2 Regulation 44 CFR 201.6 Local Mitigation Plans – Regulation Checklist Element A1 (c) ES - 2 City of San Marino Local Hazards Mitigation Plan – Executive Summary City Stakeholders contacted in the development of the San Marino LHMP included: • San Marino Unified School District • Director of Maintenance & Operations Jim Fahey • Los Angeles County Area C Coordinator, John Penido • San Marino Chamber of Commerce • Sempra Energy Gas Company, Helen Romero Shaw • Southern California Edison, Tom De Cobos • San Gabriel Valley American Red Cross Public Outreach3 Public participation is a key component to the Local Hazards Mitigation planning process. Citizen participation offers individuals and organizations the chance to voice their ideas, interests, and opinions. The Federal Emergency Management Agency also requires public input during the development of mitigation plans. The City of San Marino Local Hazards Mitigation Plan integrates a cross-section of citizen input throughout the planning process. To accomplish this goal, the City of San Marino developed a public participation process utilizing the following components: (1) Engaging San Marino’s Hazard Mitigation Advisory Committee and the San Marino City Council which is comprised of knowledgeable individual’s representative of the community. (2) Conducting one on one stakeholder interviews to target the specialized knowledge of individuals working with populations or areas at risk from natural and manmade hazards; (3) Conducting one public workshop where the community was invited; and (4) Participating in several regional partner meetings to identify common concerns and ideas regarding hazard mitigation and to discuss specific goals and actions of the mitigation plan. Integrating public participation during the development of the City of San Marino Local Hazards Mitigation Plan has ultimately resulted in increased public awareness. Through
Recommended publications
  • Attachment E Part 2

    Attachment E Part 2

    Response to Correspondence from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy Regarding the ArtCenter Master Plan Note that the emails (Attachment A) dated after April 25, 2018, were provided to the City after the end of the CEQA comment period, and, therefore, the emails and the responses below are not included in the EIR, and no response is required under CEQA. However, for sake of complete analysis and consideration of all comments submitted, the City responds herein and this document is made part of the project staff report. Response to Correspondence This correspondence with the Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy occurred in the context of the preparation of the EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The formal comment letter from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy included in this correspondence was responded to as Letter No. 6 in Section III, Response to Comments, of the April 2018 Final EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The primary correspondence herein is comprised of emails between John Howell and Mickey Long discussing whether there is a wildlife corridor within the Hillside Campus, as well as emails between John Howell and CDFW regarding whether there is a wildlife corridor and whether CDFW will provide a comment letter regarding the ArtCenter Project for the Planning Commission hearing on May 9, 2018. Note that CDFW submitted a comment letter on May 9, 2018, after completion of the Draft EIR and Final EIR. The City has also provided a separate response to this late comment letter. This correspondence centers around the potential for the Hillside Campus to contribute to a wildlife corridor. The CDFW was contacted during preparation of the Final EIR to obtain specific mapping information to provide a more comprehensive description of the potential for wildlife movement within the Hillside Campus within the Final EIR.
  • Urban Interface (WUI) Fires

    Urban Interface (WUI) Fires

    NIST Special Publication 1198 Summary of Workshop on Structure Ignition in Wildland- Urban Interface (WUI) Fires Sponsored by ASTM International E05 Committee Samuel L. Manzello Stephen L. Quarles This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1198 NIST Special Publication 1198 Summary of Workshop on Structure Ignition in Wildland- Urban Interface (WUI) Fires Sponsored by ASTM International E05 Committee Samuel L. Manzello Fire Research Division Engineering Laboratory Stephen L. Quarles Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety Richburg, SC This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1198 September 2015 U.S. Department of Commerce Penny Pritzker, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Willie May, Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and Director Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. The content of the oral presentations reproduced in this workshop report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent NIST’s perspective. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 1198 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 1198, 82 pages (September 2015) CODEN: NSPUE2 This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1198 Table of contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Workshop Objectives 1 1.2 Program of Workshop 2 1.3 Participant Listing 5 2.
  • Water Resources

    Water Resources

    Preliminary Investigation B: Water Resources Prepared by: Tim Brick, Arroyo Seco Foundation The Arroyo Seco watershed is a major source of local water supply. The Arroyo Seco and its mountain watershed contribute about 40% of the water supply for Pasadena and neighboring communities. The Raymond Basin The Arroyo Seco watershed feeds the Raymond Basin aquifer, a 40 square mile groundwater basin that extends from La Canada and the San Rafael hills on the west to Santa Anita Canyon on the east, from the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains to the Raymond fault, a seven mile seismic feature, which runs along the boundary between Pasadena and South Pasadena and then extends out through San Marino and Arcadia to Santa Anita Canyon on the east. The groundwater basin is recharged by the Arroyo Seco, a tributary of the Los Angeles River, and by Eaton Canyon, Santa Anita Canyon and other streams in the watershed of the San Gabriel River. The Arroyo Seco stream contributes approximately one third of the natural replenishment of the aquifer. The long-term average yield of the Raymond Basin is about 30,000 acre-feet per year. Pumping rights in the Raymond Basin are adjudicated, i.e. determined by a court order, and managed by the Raymond Basin Management Board. The goal of the basin management program is to ensure a safe yield which will balance extraction with natural replenishment. Sixteen pumpers have rights to pump from the Raymond Basin. Three major subareas make up the aquifer: the Monk Hill subarea, which underlies La Canada and Northwest Pasadena, the larger Pasadena subarea, which underlies Pasadena and Altadena, and the Santa Anita subarea, which underlies Arcadia and Sierra Madre.
  • 2017 Form 3805V

    2017 Form 3805V

    2017 Instructions for Form FTB 3805V Net Operating Loss (NOL) Computation and NOL and Disaster Loss Limitations — Individuals, Estates, and Trusts References in these instructions are to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of January 1, 2015, and the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC). General Information For NOLs incurred in taxable years beginning Nonbusiness capital losses and gains are on or after January 1, 2008, California has losses and gains from other than a trade or In general, for taxable years beginning on or extended the NOL carryover period from 10 business. These include sales of stock, metals, after January 1, 2015, California law conforms taxable years to 20 taxable years following the and other appreciable assets as well as any to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as of year of the loss. recognized gain from the sale of your principal January 1, 2015. However, there are continuing For taxable years that began in 2002 and residence. differences between California and federal 2003, California suspended the NOL carryover Business losses: law. When California conforms to federal tax deduction. Taxpayers continued to compute You may deduct business capital losses only law changes, we do not always adopt all of and carryover an NOL during the suspension up to the total of business capital gains and the changes made at the federal level. For period. However, the deduction for disaster any nonbusiness capital gains that remain after more information, go to ftb.ca.gov and search losses was not affected by the NOL suspension deducting nonbusiness capital losses and other for conformity.
  • Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire

    Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire

    GREATER FLAGSTAFF AREA COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN REVIEW & REVISION May 2012 1 PURPOSE In the summer of 2011, the Greater Flagstaff Forests Partnership (GFFP) and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (PFAC) initiated a project to “review” the “Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Flagstaff and Surrounding Communities in tHe Coconino and Kaibab National Forests of Coconino County, Arizona” (CWPP). First approved in 2005, the CWPP review is designed to assess the status of implementation activities and evaluate progress towards desired goals. Although not required per the authorizing legislation (Healthy Forest Restoration Act of 2003 - HFRA), nor by the CWPP itself, this was intended to analyze activity within the CWPP area that addressed goals or was influenced by the plan, and to develop a report for local government and land management agencies on findings - it was not designed to revise the text or intent of the CWPP. Primary emphasis was placed on summarizing treatment activity to date and reviewing the “Improved Protection Capabilities” section included on pages 40-43 of the Plan. INTRODUCTION The Greater Flagstaff Area Community Wildfire Protection Plan was approved by the Arizona State Forester, Coconino County, City of Flagstaff, and Ponderosa Fire Advisory Council (representing local fire departments and fire districts) in January of 2005. Jointly developed by the GFFP and PFAC, the plan covered a 939,736-acre area centered on Flagstaff. Working closely with US Forest Service staff and the NAU Forest Ecosystem Restoration Analysis (Forest ERA) program, the CWPP was designed to address the following Goal, Objectives and Principles (quoted form the CWPP): GOAL To protect Flagstaff and surrounding communities, and associated values and infrastructure, from catastrophic wildfire by means of: a) An educated and involved public, b) Implementation of forest treatment projects designed to reduce wildfire threat and improve long term forest health, in a progressive and prioritized manner, and c) Utilization of FireWise building techniques and principles.
  • The Disaster Center Is Dedicated to the Idea That Disaster Mitigation Is

    The Disaster Center Is Dedicated to the Idea That Disaster Mitigation Is

    The Disaster Center is dedicated to the idea that disaster mitigation is cost effective and individuals pursuing their own interest are the greatest potential force for disaster reduction. Please consider making a small donation to the Disaster Center When disaster mitigation is cost effective, we are on the road to bringing disasters to an end. •Daily Operations Briefing •Thursday, May 15, 2014 8:30 a.m. EDT Significant Activity: May 14 – 15 Significant Events: • San Diego County, CA – Fires Significant Weather: • Slight risk of severe thunderstorms – Carolinas & the Mid-Atlantic States • Rain and thunderstorms – Eastern U.S. • Elevated Fire Weather – Southern CA • Red Flag Warnings – CA, & AK • Space Weather: Past 24 hours: none occurred; next 24 hours: none predicted FEMA Readiness: No significant changes Declaration Activity: • Amendment No. 2 to FEMA-4177-DR-FL • FMAGs approved for Poinsettia Fire (FEMA-5054-FM) & Cocos Fire (FEMA-5055-FM) in CA Poinsettia Fire – Carlsbad, California Fire Acres % Structures Lost / Fatalities / Location Est. Full Containment FMAG Name burned Contained Threatened Injuries Carlsbad, CA FEMA-5054-FM-CA Poinsettia Fire 250 50% N/A 11 / 2,600 0 / 0 (San Diego County) Approved May 14 Situation • Fire began May 14 in Carlsbad CA (pop. 105,328) Impacts • Evacuations implemented for 15,000 residents & 4 public schools • As of 10:40 pm PDT: Portions of the evacuations are being lifted • 8 homes, 18-unit apartment complex & 2 commercial structures have been damaged/destroyed • Palomar Airport lost power/on generator • 2,500 homes, 100 businesses, an amusement park and local schools Source: CAL FIRE threatened • Two ARC Shelters opened with 75 occupants (NSS Shelter Report May 15) Response • Reverse 911 implemented to notify approximately 11,627 homes • CA Southern Regional EOC is at Level 1 (Full Activation) • Governor declared State of Emergency for San Diego County, May 14 Cocos Fire – San Marcos, California Fire Acres % Structures Lost / Fatalities / Location Est.
  • Long-Term Fault Slip Rates, Distributed Deformation Rates, and Forecast Of

    Long-Term Fault Slip Rates, Distributed Deformation Rates, and Forecast Of

    1 Long-term fault slip rates, distributed deformation rates, and forecast of seismicity 2 in the western United States from joint fitting of community geologic, geodetic, 3 and stress-direction datasets 4 Peter Bird 5 Department of Earth and Space Sciences 6 University of California 7 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567 8 [email protected] 9 Second revision of 2009.07.08 for J. Geophys. Res. (Solid Earth) 10 ABSTRACT. The long-term-average velocity field of the western United States is computed 11 with a kinematic finite-element code. Community datasets include fault traces, geologic offset 12 rates, geodetic velocities, principal stress directions, and Euler poles. There is an irreducible 13 minimum amount of distributed permanent deformation, which accommodates 1/3 of Pacific- 14 North America relative motion in California. Much of this may be due to slip on faults not 15 included in the model. All datasets are fit at a common RMS level of 1.8 datum standard 16 deviations. Experiments with alternate weights, fault sets, and Euler poles define a suite of 17 acceptable community models. In pseudo-prospective tests, fault offset rates are compared to 18 126 additional published rates not used in the computation: 44% are consistent; another 48% 19 have discrepancies under 1 mm/a, and 8% have larger discrepancies. Updated models are then 20 computed. Novel predictions include: dextral slip at 2~3 mm/a in the Brothers fault zone, two 21 alternative solutions for the Mendocino triple junction, slower slip on some trains of the San 22 Andreas fault than in recent hazard models, and clockwise rotation of some domains in the 23 Eastern California shear zone.
  • Economic Recovery Recommendation Report

    Economic Recovery Recommendation Report

    Economic Recovery Recommendation Report June 2020 Los Angeles County Economic Resiliency Task Force Infrastructure Development and Construction Sector Subcommittee Fran Inman, Chair County of Los Angeles Coronavirus (COVID-19) Economic Resiliency Task Force Infrastructure Development and Construction Sector Recommendation Report Introduction: As Los Angeles County represents a huge, diverse geographic footprint with an incredibly diverse population base, we collectively have the opportunity with the Infrastructure, Development, and Construction sector(s) to provide a robust economic stimulus across our County and beyond. In the face of the COVID-19 crisis, the County must strengthen its commitment to sustainability, equity, and resilience in order to create a pathway for investment in a safe, healthy, and inclusive future. Throughout our nation’s history, a concerted focus on infrastructure investments during an economic downturn has reaped both short-term and long-term benefits. This combined sector represents an enormous opportunity to leverage both public and private investments to provide immediate positive economic impacts for all with good paying jobs, dynamic career pathways, and the pride of playing a part in the development of tangible assets. We appreciate the work of our fellow task force sectors and recognize that each and every one of these sectors has cross-over economic recovery needs relating to infrastructure, development, and construction. Our work group represents a broad base and stands ready to continue our engagement as we recognize that our work will not be complete with this initial report. We hope the focus we have provided with our initial recommendations will be viewed as just the beginning of our bold, inclusive vision.
  • 2013 Kansas Fire Incident Reporting System Annual Report

    2013 Kansas Fire Incident Reporting System Annual Report

    2013 Kansas Fire Incident Reporting System Annual Report What did the Kansas Fire Service do in 2013? Office of the State Fire Marshal Doug Jorgensen Fire Marshal 800 SW Jackson, Suite 104 Topeka, KS 66612 Phone: (785) 296-3401 www.ksfm.ks.gov Kansas Fire Incident Reporting System Kansas fire departments are required under K.A.R 22-5-1 to submit a report for each incident where a response is made by that fire department, regardless of the call type or actions taken on the call. Also included in the requirements are reports for any fire service casualty, injury or death, that occurs while acting in an official role a call, responding to a call, drilling, at the station, etc. Firefighter injuries caused by equipment failures are heavily scrutinized to continue improving the safety of our Fire Service. Kansas does not have a central repository of fire reports. Instead, reports received at the Office of the State Fire Marshal are uploaded directly into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) housed at the National Fire Data Center (NFDC) at the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA). Each year, the USFA releases the most comprehensive reference on the nature and scope of the fire problem in the United States, Fire in the United States. The agencies and departments participating in the NFIRS make the publication possible. In addition to publications, the data can highlight current and emerging trends for more than fires. A variety of different public safety groups use the information to drive improvements through regulation, creating better equipment, training, education, product recalls, and funding.
  • Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Improvements

    Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Improvements

    REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED RIO HONDO SATELLITE CAMPUS EL RANCHO ADULT SCHOOL 9515 HANEY STREET PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: RIO HONDO PROGRAM MANAGEMENT TEAM Whittier, California January 20, 2016 Project 4953-15-0302 January 20, 2016 Mr Luis Rojas Rio Hondo Program Management Team c/o Rio Hondo College 3600 Workman Mill Road Whittier, California 90601-1699 Subject: LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Improvements Proposed Rio Hondo Satellite Campus El Rancho Adult School 9515 Haney Street Pico Rivera, California, 90660 Amec Foster Wheeler Project 4953-15-0302 Dear Mr. Rojas: We are pleased to submit the results of our geotechnical investigation for the proposed improvements as part of the proposed Rio Hondo Satellite Campus at the El Rancho Adult School in Pico Rivera, California. This investigation was performed in general accordance with our proposal dated November 24, 2015, which was authorized by e-mail on December 15, 2015. The scope of our services was planned with Mr. Manuel Jaramillo of DelTerra. We have been furnished with a site plan and a general description of the proposed improvements. The results of our investigation and design recommendations are presented in this report. Please note that you or your representative should submit copies of this report to the appropriate governmental agencies for their review and approval prior to obtaining a permit. Correspondence: Amec Foster Wheeler 6001 Rickenbacker Road Los Angeles, California 90040 USA
  • NWS Public Information Statement

    NWS Public Information Statement

    Page 1 of 4 Send to Printer PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT NOUS46 KLOX 040045 PNSLOX PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE LOS ANGELES/OXNARD CA 445 PM PST MON FEB 03 2008 ...PRELIMINARY RAINFALL TOTALS... THE FOLLOWING ARE RAINFALL TOTALS IN INCHES FOR THIS RAIN EVENT THROUGH 400 PM THIS AFTERNOON. .LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN AVALON............................ 0.83 HAWTHORNE (KHHR).................. 0.63 DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES.............. 0.68 LOS ANGELES AP (KLAX)............. 0.40 LONG BEACH (KLGB)................. 0.49 SANTA MONICA (KSMO)............... 0.42 MONTE NIDO FS..................... 0.63 BIG ROCK MESA..................... 0.75 BEL AIR HOTEL..................... 0.39 BALLONA CK @ SAWTELLE............. 0.40 BEVERLY HILLS..................... 0.30 HOLLYWOOD RSVR.................... 0.20 L.A. R @ FIRESTONE................ 0.30 DOMINGUEZ WATER CO................ 0.59 LA HABRA HEIGHTS.................. 0.28 .LOS ANGELES COUNTY VALLEYS BURBANK (KBUR).................... 0.14 VAN NUYS (KVNY)................... 0.50 NEWHALL........................... 0.22 AGOURA............................ 0.39 CHATSWORTH RSVR................... 0.61 CANOGA PARK....................... 0.53 SEPULVEDA CYN @ MULHL............. 0.43 PACOIMA DAM....................... 0.51 HANSEN DAM........................ 0.30 NEWHALL-SOLEDAD SCHL.............. 0.20 SAUGUS............................ 0.02 DEL VALLE......................... 0.39 .LOS ANGELES COUNTY SAN GABRIEL VALLEY L.A. CITY COLLEGE................. 0.11 EAGLE ROCK RSRV................... 0.24 EATON WASH @ LOFTUS............... 0.20 SAN GABRIEL R @ VLY............... 0.15 WALNUT CK S.B..................... 0.39 SANTA FE DAM...................... 0.33 WHITTIER HILLS.................... 0.30 CLAREMONT......................... 0.61 .LOS ANGELES COUNTY MOUNTAINS AND FOOTHILLS http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/cnrfc/printprod.php?sid=LOX&pil=PNS&version=1 2/3/2008 Page 2 of 4 MOUNT WILSON CBS.................. 0.73 W FK HELIPORT..................... 0.95 SANTA ANITA DAM..................
  • Los Angeles County

    Los Angeles County

    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Los Angeles County Arroyo Sequit Arroyo Sequit consists of about 3.3 stream miles. The arroyo is formed by the confluence of the East and West forks, from where it flows south to enter the Pacific Ocean east of Sequit Point. As part of a survey of 32 southern coastal watersheds, Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1979. The O. mykiss sampled were between about two and 6.5 inches in length. The survey report states, “Historically, small steelhead runs have been reported in this area” (DFG 1980). It also recommends, “…future upstream water demands and construction should be reviewed to insure that riparian and aquatic habitats are maintained” (DFG 1980). Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1989-1990 as part of a study of six streams originating in the Santa Monta Mountains. The resulting report indicates the presence of steelhead and states, “Low streamflows are presently limiting fish habitat, particularly adult habitat, and potential fish passage problems exist…” (Keegan 1990a, p. 3-4). Staff from DFG surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 1993 and captured O. mykiss, taking scale and fin samples for analysis. The individuals ranged in length between about 7.7 and 11.6 inches (DFG 1993). As reported in a distribution study, a 15-17 inch trout was observed in March 2000 in Arroyo Sequit (Dagit 2005). Staff from NMFS surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 2002 as part of a study of steelhead distribution. An adult steelhead was observed during sampling (NMFS 2002a). Additional documentation of steelhead using the creek between 2000-2007 was provided by Dagit et al.