Index Locorum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Index Locorum Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-68721-9 — Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic Henriette van der Blom Index More Information Index locorum [Anonymous] De offi ciis Rhetorica ad Herennium , 26 2.49– 50, 28 – 29 Appian De oratore , 5 , 31 Bellum Civile 3.214, 103 – 05 1.22, 90 – 91 In Catilinam , 186 2.1, 150 4.7– 11, 165 – 66 In Pisonem , 191 – 94 Cassius Dio 1– 2, 181 – 82 36.25- 36a, 124 14, 185 – 88 38.5.4, 132 29, 189 – 90 Censorinus 72– 4, 193 – 94 DN In Verrem 14.2, 29 1.45, 121 Char. letter to Cornelius Nepos (Suetonius Diuus 101, 1, 76 Iulius 55.2), 148 313, 18 (GL I.240, 16), 75 Orator Cicero 233, 76 ad Atticum Philippics 1.14.1- 4 (SB 14), 132 – 28 2.78, 260 1.14.5 (SB 14), 222 – 23 3.27, 5.21, 267 – 68 1.18.7 (SB 18), 220 – 21 12.14– 15, 198 – 200 2.21.3 (SB 41), 134 – 35 13.22– 48, 275 4.18.4 (SB 92), 230 – 31 Post reditum in Senatu 7.8.5 (SB 131), 256 17, 186 14.10.1 (SB 364), 265 Pro Fonteio ad familiares 39, 85 – 86 2.18.2 (SB 115), 250 Pro Milone 8.1.3 (SB 77), 113 – 14 65– 6, 141 – 40 8.8.9 (SB 84), 133 Pro Murena 15.5.1 (SB 111), 237 – 38 13, 215 Brutus , 5 Pro Sestio 125– 6, 69 21, 46 , 186, 25 , 42 74, 137 – 38 239, 116 , 107, 135 252– 61, 148 – 49 Tusculanae Disputationes De divinatione 3.48, 86 – 87 1.36, 2.62, 89 Coelius Antipater 1.56, 78 fr. 49 FRHist , 78 De inventione , 26 De legibus Diodorus Siculus 3.20, 90 – 91 37.9, 90 – 91 363 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-68721-9 — Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic Henriette van der Blom Index More Information 364 Index locorum Festus 25.4, 124 Gloss. Lat . 47.7, 132 IV.310, 84 , 87 – 88 54.1, 129 – 30 57.9, 133 Gellius Tiberius Gracchus Noctes Atticae 8.7, 88 – 89 1.7.6, 85 Prisc. 1.23.1- 2, 11 GL II.513, 16, 80 4.16.8, 154 – 55 5.13.6, 156 – 57 Quintilian 9.14.16- 17, 87 – 88 Institutio Oratoria , 20 , 26 10.3.3, 96 – 98 3.8.49- 50, 118 – 19 11.13.1- 3, 84 5.13.2- 4, 28 13.3.5., 158 – 59 10.1.114, 150 – 51 15.12.1- 2, 76 10.2.25, 150 11.1.36, 118 Iul. rufi n. RhL Sallust p. 40, 23, 156 – 57 Bellum Catilinae 51– 52, 186 – 87 Julius Caesar Historiae Bellum Ciuile 4.42, 121 1.4.1, 240 – 41 5.16– 20, 124 Schol. Bob. Orosius 81St., 98 6.6.4, 129 – 30 Suetonius De grammaticis Pliny the Elder 7, 150 Historia Naturalis De rhetoribus 7.99, 128 – 29 1, 120 Plutarch Diuus Iulius , 150 Caesar 6.1 , 160 – 62 3.1- 2, 151 22.2, 172 Cato Minor 55, 151 – 52 1.3, 204 – 05 55.1, 146 – 47 4.3, 209 55.2, 148 17.5- 6, 212 84 . 1 – 2 , 265 21, 215 26.5 , 218 41.5– 6, 226 – 27 Tacitus 45.4, 231 Annales 47.1, 232 13.3, 151 51.1– 5, 227 – 28 Dialogus de oratoribus Gaius Gracchus 28.4- 6, 149 2– 3, 76 36.6– 7, 1 5.3, 91 8.1, 93 – 94 Valerius Maximus Marcus Antonius 8.9.3, 155 2.8, 253 Velleius Paterculus 40.8, 251 2.31, 124 Pompeius 2.49.3, 240 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-68721-9 — Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic Henriette van der Blom Index More Information Subject index Aelius Stilo, L. (ghostwriter), 119 contional speeches, 256 , 260 , 262 , 264 , Aemilius Lepidus, M. (triumvir), 251 , 264 , 267 – 68 , 271 – 72 , 276 – 77 274 , 275 funeral speech over Caesar, 264 – 67 Aemilius Lepidus, Mam. (cos. 77 BC ), 158 military, 272 , 273 , 274 , 275 – 76 Aemilius Paullus, L. (cos. 50 BC ), 197 and family exempla , 49 Aemilius Scaurus, M. (cos. 115 BC ) forensic speeches, 254 – 55 autobiography, 17 hostis , 200 , 269 Aemilius Scaurus, M. (pr. 56 BC ), 229 legate under Caesar in Gaul, 250 , 255 Africa, 175 , 236 Lupercalia 44 BC , 263 Alba, 273 magister equitum , 259 Alps, the, 275 magister luperci Iulii , 263 Amazons, 172 marriage with Fulvia political tactic, 259 Ampius Balbus, T. (pr. 59 BC ), 119 , 136 military career as factor for political ancestry and political career, 46 – 49 success, 279 Ancus Marcius, 160 networks as factor for political success, 255 , Annaeus Lucanus, M. 261 , 278 on Pompeius, 116 on Octavian’s ancestry, 48 Annaeus Seneca, L. (the Younger) oratory on Pompeius, 116 choice to use oratory against Cicero, 271 Annius Milo, T. (pr. 55 BC ), 136 , 139 , 233 – 34 , declamation practices, 251 254 , 259 education in, 249 – 53 Antidotus (Stoic, teacher of Cato), 207 e ff ect on his career, 256 – 57 , 278 Antipater the Tyrian (Stoic, teacher of e ff ective speaker, 249 , 273 – 74 Cato), 207 not considered good orator, 44 Antonia (wife of Marcus Antonius), 262 persuasive, 251 , 277 – 78 Antonius Gnipho, M., 150 powerful, 256 Antonius Hybrida, C. (cos. 63 BC ), 153 skill, 277 Antonius, M. (cos. 99 BC ), 12 , 250 style, 250 , 253 , 275 , 277 Antonius, M. (triumvir), 6 , 9 , 248 – 79 testimonia of his, 248 – 54 activities after the Ides of March, 198 uneven distribution between oratorical ancestry as factor for political success, settings, 277 255 , 278 use of to promote career, 279 auctioning off Pompeius’ assets 47- 45 in Plutarch, 15 BC , 259 – 61 popularity with the people augur, 250 , 255 from funeral speech over Caesar, 265 career choices, 261 tapping into Clodius’, 254 – 55 , 259 articulation of, 254 – 55 , 265 – 66 praefectus equitum , 250 charisma as factor for political success, 278 – 79 proconsulship, 274 – 77 consulship, 261 – 74 public persona, 273 as reward for good service to Caesar, quaestorship, 250 259 , 261 canvass for, 254 – 55 365 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-68721-9 — Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic Henriette van der Blom Index More Information 366 Subject index Antonius, M. (triumvir) (cont.) Asinius Pollio, C. rapport with soldiers, 251 , 272 , 277 – 78 prosecutions, 31 relationship with Clodius, 254 – 55 as source, 16 , 266 rhetorical exercises, 120 Athenodorus (Stoic, teacher of Cato), 207 senatorial speeches, 256 – 57 , 260 – 62 , 263 – 64 , Athens, 274 267 , 268 – 71 , 273 audience speeches contional, 33 , 36 – 37 against anti- Caesarians and Cicero 2 and public profi les, 286 – 87 , 288 October 44 BC , 271 – 72 Augustus, 131 , 175 against Cicero 19 September 44 BC , emulating Pompeius’ recusatio and 252 , 269 – 71 dissimulatio , 141 , 282 against Dolabella 44 BC , 261 – 62 impact on reception of Caesar’s against Dolabella 45 BC , 260 – 61 oratory, 151 – 52 against Pompeius December 50 BC , 256 when C. Julius Caesar Octavianus, 199 , 251 , attack on Cicero 1 September 44 268 , 271 , 272 , 274 , 276 BC , 268 – 69 Aurelius Cotta, C. (cos. 75 BC ), 155 contio after the murder of Caesar, 264 Aurelius Orestes, L., 76 contio after the murder of Cicero 43 BC , 276 – 77 Basilica Porcia, 210 contio July 44 BC , 268 Brando, Marlon, 266 contio March 45 BC , 260 Brundisium, 272 funeral speech over Caesar, 248 , 264 – 67 e ff ects of, 265 – 66 Caecilius Metellus Celer, Q. (cos. 60 BC ), 171 inspiration to others, 265 Caecilius Metellus Nepos, Q. (cos. 57 BC ), 166 , later reception of, 264 – 67 167 , 213 , 217 , 218 in January 49 BC , 257 – 58 Caecilius Metellus Pius Scipio Nasica, Q., 257 on keeping an army near Rome 44 BC , Caelius Rufus, M. (pr. 48 BC ), 113 , 125 , 267 – 68 , 275 133 , 259 military contio after Mutina 43 BC , 275 – 76 Caesulenus, L. ‘accusator ’ (RE 1), 31 military contio November 44 BC , 273 Calpurnia (daughter of Piso Caesoninus, wife of military contiones autumn 44 BC , 272 Caesar), 196 on provincial allotments November 44 Calpurnius Bestia, L. (tr. pl. 62 BC ), 166 BC , 273 Calpurnius Bibulus, M. (cos. 59 BC ), 170 , 172 , possible fragments, 267 – 68 173 , 174 , 232 possible speeches as magister equitum , 259 political networks, 55 prosecution of Milo 52 BC , 254 – 55 produced by Caesar in contio 59 BC , 171 in senate after the murder of request for supplication 50 BC , 237 – 40 Caesar, 263 – 64 Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, L., 2 , 6 , 9 , in senate January 49 BC , 256 – 57 181 – 203 in senate to abolish offi ce of dictator , 267 in altercatio , 41 study trip abroad, 250 ancestry, 47 tribunate, 197 , 250 , 255 , 256 – 59 ancestry as factor for political success, 181 – 82 , triumvirate, 274 – 77 183 – 84 , 201 , 202 use of contio , 34 attacking Cicero’s post- exile use of religion for political purposes, 260 , self- presentation, 193 261 – 62 , 263 average politician, arguably an, 182 , 203 wealth as factor for political success, 255 , 278 career choices, 189 , 202 Apollonius Molon, 150 articulation of, 190 Appian censorship, 196 – 97 on Caesar’s oratory, 150 on Cicero’s poetry, 192 , 193 – 94 on Piso’s oratory, 198 , 200 – 01 consulship, 183 , 185 – 90 as source, 17 – 18 election to, 184 , 223 Ariobarzanes, 237 contio Ariovistus, 175 shunning, 202 Asia, 172 , 174 contional speeches, 185 – 88 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-68721-9 — Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic Henriette van der Blom Index More Information Subject index 367 courts possible speech in aftermath of Caesar’s shunning, 202 murder, 198 disappearance from sources 54- 50 BC , in senate 50- 49 BC , 197 – 98 195 , 196 – 97 in senate on Cicero’s recall 58 BC , 189 – 90 Epicurean beliefs, 182 , 187 – 88 , 189 , 191 , wealth as factor for political success, 184 197 , 201 – 02 Calpurnius Piso Frugi, C.
Recommended publications
  • INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119
    INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary Ingo Gildenhard https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2018 Ingo Gildenhard The text of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the author(s), but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work. Attribution should include the following information: Ingo Gildenhard, Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0156 Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https:// www.openbookpublishers.com/product/845#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.
    [Show full text]
  • Henrietta Van Der Blom, Christa Gray, and Catherine Steel (Eds.)
    Henrietta Van der Blom, Christa Gray, and Catherine Steel (eds.). Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2017. Hb. $120.00 USD. Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome is a collection of papers first presented at a conference in 2014, which in turn arose from the Fragments of the Republican Roman Orators (FRRO) project. Perhaps ironically, few of these papers focus on oratorical fragments, although the ways in which Republican politicians communicated with each other and the voting public is a common theme across the collection. In their introduction the editors foreground the interplay between political institutions and ideology as a key point of conflict in late Republican politics, taking aim in particular at the interpretation of Republican political life as dominated by money and self-serving politicians at the top and by institutionally curated consensus at the bottom. This, they argue, is unsustainable, not least in light of the evidence presented by their contributors of politicians sharing and acting on ‘ideological’ motives within the constraints of Republican institutions. Sixteen papers grouped into four sections follow; the quality is consistently high, and several chapters are outstanding. The four chapters of Part I address ‘Modes of Political Communication’. Alexander Yakobson opens with an exploration of the contio as an institution where the elite were regularly hauled in front of the populus and treated less than respectfully by junior politicians they would probably have considered beneath them. He argues that the paternalism of Roman public life was undercut by the fact that ‘the “parents” were constantly fighting in front of the children’ (32).
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Njcl Certamen Round A1 (Revised)
    1996 NJCL CERTAMEN ROUND A1 (REVISED) 1. Who immortalized the wife of Quintus Caecilius Metellus as Lesbia in his poetry? (GAIUS VALERIUS) CATULLUS What was probably the real name of Lesbia? CLODIA What orator fiercely attacked Clodia in his Pro Caelio? (MARCUS TULLIUS) CICERO 2. According to Hesiod, who was the first born of Cronus and Rhea? HESTIA Who was the second born? DEMETER Who was the fifth born? POSEIDON 3. Name the twin brothers who fought in their mother's womb. PROETUS & ACRISIUS Whom did Proetus marry? ANTIA (ANTEIA) (STHENEBOEA) With what hero did Antia fall in love? BELLEROPHON 4. Give the comparative and superlative forms of mult§ PLâRS, PLâRIM¦ ...of prÇ. PRIOR, PR¦MUS ...of hebes. HEBETIOR, HEBETISSIMUS 5. LegÇ means “I collect.” What does lectitÇ mean? (I) COLLECT OFTEN, EAGERLY Sitis means “thirst.” What does the verb sitiÇ mean? (I) AM THIRSTY / THIRST CantÇ means “I sing.” What does cantillÇ mean? (I) CHIRP, WARBLE, HUM, SING LOW 6. Differentiate in meaning between p~vÇ and paveÇ. P}VÆ -- PEACOCK PAVEÆ -- (I) FEAR, TREMBLE Differentiate in meaning between cavÇ and caveÇ. CAVÆ -- I HOLLOW OUT CAVEÆ -- I TAKE HEED, BEWARE Differentiate in meaning between modo (must pronounce with short “o”) and madeÇ. MODO -- ONLY, MERELY, BUT, JUST, IMMEDIATELY, PROVIDED THAT MADEÆ -- I AM WET, DRUNK Page 1 -- A1 7. What two words combine to form the Latin verb malÇ? MAGIS & VOLÆ What does malÇ mean? PREFER M~la is a contracted form of maxilla. What is a m~la? CHEEK, JAW 8. Which of the emperors of AD 193 executed the assassins of Commodus? DIDIUS JULIANUS How had Julianus gained imperial power? BOUGHT THE THRONE AT AN AUCTION (HELD BY THE PRAETORIANS) Whom had the Praetorians murdered after his reign of 87 days? PERTINAX 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Oratio Recta and Oratio Obliqua in Caesar's De Bello
    VOICES OF THE ENEMY: ORATIO RECTA AND ORATIO OBLIQUA IN CAESAR’S DE BELLO GALLICO by RANDY FIELDS (Under the Direction of James C. Anderson, jr.) ABSTRACT According to his contemporaries and critics, Julius Caesar was an eminent orator. Despite the lack of any extant orations written by Caesar, however, one may gain insight into Caesar’s rhetorical ability in his highly literary commentaries, especially the De Bello Gallico. Throughout this work, Caesar employs oratio obliqua (and less frequently oratio recta) to animate his characters and give them “voices.” Moreover, the individuals to whom he most frequently assigns such vivid speeches are his opponents. By endowing his adversaries in his Commentarii with the power of speech (with exquisite rhetorical form, no less), Caesar develops consistent characterizations throughout the work. Consequently, the portrait of self-assured, unification-minded Gauls emerges. Serving as foils to Caesar’s own character, these Gauls sharpen the contrast between themselves and Caesar and therefore serve to elevate Caesar’s status in the minds of his reader. INDEX WORDS: Caesar, rhetoric, oratory, De Bello Gallico, historiography, propaganda, opponent, oratio obliqua, oratio recta VOICES OF THE ENEMY: ORATIO RECTA AND ORATIO OBLIQUA IN CAESAR’S DE BELLO GALLICO by RANDY FIELDS B.S., Vanderbilt University, 1992 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2005 © 2005 Randy Fields All Rights Reserved VOICES OF THE ENEMY: ORATIO RECTA AND ORATIO OBLIQUA IN CAESAR’S DE BELLO GALLICO by RANDY FIELDS Major Professor: James C.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Measure: Caesar's Geographies of Gallia and Britannia in Their Contexts and As Evidence of His World Map
    The World's Measure: Caesar's Geographies of Gallia and Britannia in their Contexts and as Evidence of his World Map Christopher B. Krebs American Journal of Philology, Volume 139, Number 1 (Whole Number 553), Spring 2018, pp. 93-122 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2018.0003 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/687618 Access provided at 25 Oct 2019 22:25 GMT from Stanford Libraries THE WORLD’S MEASURE: CAESAR’S GEOGRAPHIES OF GALLIA AND BRITANNIA IN THEIR CONTEXTS AND AS EVIDENCE OF HIS WORLD MAP CHRISTOPHER B. KREBS u Abstract: Caesar’s geographies of Gallia and Britannia as set out in the Bellum Gallicum differ in kind, the former being “descriptive” and much indebted to the techniques of Roman land surveying, the latter being “scientific” and informed by the methods of Greek geographers. This difference results from their different contexts: here imperialist, there “cartographic.” The geography of Britannia is ultimately part of Caesar’s (only passingly and late) attested great cartographic endeavor to measure “the world,” the beginning of which coincided with his second British expedition. To Tony Woodman, on the occasion of his retirement as Basil L. Gildersleeve Professor of Classics at the University of Virginia, in gratitude. IN ALEXANDRIA AT DINNER with Cleopatra, Caesar felt the sting of curiosity. He inquired of “the linen-wearing Acoreus” (linigerum . Acorea, Luc. 10.175), a learned priest of Isis, whether he would illuminate him on the lands and peoples, gods and customs of Egypt. Surely, Lucan has him add, there had never been “a visitor more capable of the world” than he (mundique capacior hospes, 10.183).
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 WJCL STATE CONVENTION ADVANCED DIVISION Round I
    Advanced Prelims Round I 1 2017 WJCL STATE CONVENTION ADVANCED DIVISION Round I 1. During what king of Rome’s reign were a pig, sheep, and bull sacrificed together for the first time, signalling the end of the census? SERVIUS TULLIUS B1: What name is given to this particular sacrifice? SUOVETAURILIA B2: Of what wife of Tarquinius Priscus was Servius the protégé? TANAQUIL 2. Identify the type of conditional in the following sentence: Sī hanc sententiam sciam, maximē gaudeam. FUTURE LESS VIVID B1: Now translate that sentence. IF I SHOULD KNOW THIS SENTENCE/OPINION, I WOULD REJOICE (VERY) GREATLY/BE VERY GLAD B2: Make the sentence in the tossup present contrary to fact. SĪ HANC SENTENTIAM SCIREM, MAXIMĒ GAUDĒREM 3. Named but seldom called Asterius, what monster was the offspring of Pasiphae and a bull? MINOTAUR B1: The name Asterius is shared with the wife of what woman, the mother of Minos? EUROPA B2: Who was the father of Europe and Cadmus? AGENOR 4. Referring often to specific and individual magistrates and having a nationalistic theme, what type of fabulae are tragedies of Roman setting? FABULAE PRAETEXTAE B1: What type of fabulae, containing sung and spoken parts, are comedies of a Greek origin? FABULAE PALLIATAE B2: What type of fabulae were comedies of a Roman origin, which didn’t attack individuals or morals choices? FABULAE TOGATAE 5. Identify the literary device in the following line, excerpted from Book 2 of Vergil’s Aeneid: ascensū superō atque arrectīs auribus astō. ALLITERATION B1: Identify the literary device in the following line, excerpted from Book 1 of Ovid’s Metamorphoses: innumerīs tumidum Pythona sagittīs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lex Sempronia Agraria: a Soldier's Stipendum
    THE LEX SEMPRONIA AGRARIA: A SOLDIER’S STIPENDUM by Raymond Richard Hill A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Boise State University August 2016 © 2016 Raymond Richard Hill ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Raymond Richard Hill Thesis Title: The Lex Sempronia Agraria: A Soldier’s Stipendum Date of Final Oral Examination: 16 June 2016 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Raymond Richard Hill, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Katherine V. Huntley, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Lisa McClain, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Lee Ann Turner, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Katherine V. Huntley, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved for the Graduate College by Jodi Chilson, M.F.A., Coordinator of Theses and Dissertations. DEDICATION To Kessa for all of her love, patience, guidance and support. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Dr. Katherine Huntley for her hours spent proofing my work, providing insights and making suggestions on research materials. To Dr. Charles Matson Odahl who started this journey with me and first fired my curiosity about the Gracchi. To the history professors of Boise State University who helped me become a better scholar. v ABSTRACT This thesis examines mid-second century BCE Roman society to determine the forces at work that resulted in the passing of a radical piece of legislation known as the lex Sempronia agraria.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Milone: the Purposes of Cicero’S Published Defense Of
    PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T. ANNIUS MILO by ROBERT CHRISTIAN RUTLEDGE (Under the Direction of James C. Anderson, Jr.) ABSTRACT This thesis explores the trial of T. Annius Milo for the murder of P. Clodius Pulcher, which occurred in Rome in 52 BC, and the events leading up to it, as well as Marcus Tullius Cicero’s defense of Milo and his later published version of that defense. The thesis examines the purposes for Cicero’s publication of the speech because Cicero failed to acquit his client, and yet still published his defense. Before specifically examining Cicero’s goals for his publication, this thesis considers relationships between the parties involved in the trial, as well as the conflicting accounts of the murder; it then observes the volatile events and novel procedure surrounding the trial; and it also surveys the unusual topographic setting of the trial. Finally, this thesis considers the differences between the published speech and the speech delivered at trial, the timing of its publication, and possible political and philosophical purposes. INDEX WORDS: Marcus Tullius Cicero, Pro Milone, Titus Annius Milo, Publius Clodius Pulcher, Pompey, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, Quintus Asconius Pedianus, Roman Courts, Roman Trials, Roman Criminal Procedure, Ancient Criminal Procedure, Roman Rhetoric, Latin Rhetoric, Ancient Rhetoric, Roman Speeches, Roman Defense Speeches, Roman Topography, Roman Forum, Roman Philosophy, Roman Stoicism, Roman Natural Law, Roman Politics PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T. ANNIUS MILO by ROBERT CHRISTIAN RUTLEDGE B.A. Philosophy, Georgia State University, 1995 J.D., University of Georgia, 2005 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2006 © 2006 Robert Christian Rutledge All Rights Reserved PRO MILONE: THE PURPOSES OF CICERO’S PUBLISHED DEFENSE OF T.
    [Show full text]
  • Monuments and Memory: the Aedes Castoris in the Formation of Augustan Ideology
    Classical Quarterly 59.1 167–186 (2009) Printed in Great Britain 167 doi:10.1017/S00098388090000135 MONUMENTSGEOFFREY AND MEMORY S. SUMI MONUMENTS AND MEMORY: THE AEDES CASTORIS IN THE FORMATION OF AUGUSTAN IDEOLOGY I. INTRODUCTION When Augustus came to power he made every effort to demonstrate his new regime’s continuity with the past, even claiming to have handed power in 28 and 27 B.C. back to the Senate and people of Rome (Mon. Anc. 34.1). He could not escape the reality, however, that his new monarchical form of government was incompatible with the political ideals of the Republic. At the same time, Augustus was attempting to reunite a society that in the recent past had been riven by civil conflict. It should be no surprise, then, that the new ideology that evolved around the figure of the princeps attempted to retain the memory of the old Republic while at the same time promoting and securing the power of a single authority through which Rome could flourish.1 The new regime’s relationship to the recent past was complicated, too, inasmuch as Augustus’ power was forged in the cauldron of the late Republic, and he was the ultimate beneficiary of the political upheaval of his youth. Augustus’ new ideology had to recall the Republic without lingering over its tumultuous last generation; it had to restore and renew.2 Augustus’ boast that he found Rome a city of brick and left it a city of marble as well as the long list in the Res Gestae (Mon. Anc. 19–21.2) of monuments that he either built or restored declare that the new topography of the city was an important component of this new ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Stanford CERTAMEN ADVANCED LEVEL ROUND 1 TU
    2019 Stanford CERTAMEN ADVANCED LEVEL ROUND 1 TU 1. Translate this sentence into English: Servābuntne nōs Rōmānī, sī Persae īrātī vēnerint? ​ WILL THE ROMANS SAVE US IF THE ANGRY PERSIANS COME? B1: What kind of conditional is illustrated in that sentence? FUTURE MORE VIVID B2: Now translate this sentence into English: Haec nōn loquerēris nisi tam stultus ​ essēs. YOU WOULD NOT SAY THESE THINGS IF YOU WERE NOT SO STUPID TU 2. What versatile author may be the originator of satire, but is more famous for writing fabulae praetextae, fabulae palliatae, and the Annales? ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ (QUINTUS) ENNIUS B1: What silver age author remarked that Ennius had three hearts on account of his trilingualism? AULUS GELLIUS B2: Give one example either a fabula praetexta or a fabula palliata of Ennius. AMBRACIA, CAUPUNCULA, PANCRATIASTES TU 3. What modern slang word, deriving from the Latin word for “four,” is defined by the Urban Dictionary as “crew, posse, gang; an informal group of individuals with a common identity and a sense of solidarity”? SQUAD B1: What modern slang word, deriving from a Latin word meaning “bend”, means “subtly or not-so-subtly showing off your accomplishments or possessions”? FLEX B2: What modern slang word, deriving from a Latin word meaning “end” and defined by the Urban Dictionary as “a word that modern teens and preteens say even though they have absolutely no idea what it really means,” roughly means “getting around issues or problems in a slick or easy way”? FINESSE TU 4. Who elevated his son Diadumenianus to the rank of Caesar when he became emperor in 217 A.D.? MACRINUS B1: Where did Macrinus arrange for the assisination of Caracalla? CARRHAE/EDESSA B2: What was the name of the person who actually did the stabbing of Caracalla? JULIUS MARTIALIS TU 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Blood in the Streets: Mapping Political Violence Onto
    Bates College SCARAB Honors Theses Capstone Projects Spring 5-2016 Searching for Blood in the Streets: Mapping Political Violence onto Urban Topography in the Late Roman Republic, 80-50 BCE Theodore Samuel Rube Bates College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses Recommended Citation Rube, Theodore Samuel, "Searching for Blood in the Streets: Mapping Political Violence onto Urban Topography in the Late Roman Republic, 80-50 BCE" (2016). Honors Theses. 186. http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/186 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects at SCARAB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of SCARAB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Searching for Blood in the Streets: Mapping Political Violence onto Urban Topography in the Late Roman Republic, 80-50 BCE An Honors Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Classical and Medieval Studies Bates College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts By Theodore Samuel Rube Lewiston, Maine March 28th, 2016 2 Acknowledgements I want to take this opportunity to express my sincerest gratitude to everybody who during this process has helped me out, cheered me up, cheered me on, distracted me, bothered me, and has made the writing of this thesis eminently more enjoyable for their presence. I am extremely grateful for the guidance, mentoring, and humor of Professor Margaret Imber, who has helped me through every step of this adventure. I’d also like to give a very special thanks to the Bates Student Research Fund, which provided me the opportunity to study Rome’s topography in person.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Political Culture and the People's Role in the Roman Republic
    TRADITIONAL POLITICAL CULTURE AND THE PEOPLEʼS ROLE IN THE ROMAN REPUBLIC The peopleʼs role in the political system of the Roman Republic has been at the centre of scholarly debate since Millarʼs challenge to the traditional oligarchic interpretation of Republican politics.1 Today, few would dismiss the signifi cance of the popular ele- ment in the system altogether. However, many scholars strongly insist that in the fi nal analysis, the Republic, whatever popular or pseudo-popular features it possessed, was a government of the elite, by the elite and for the elite. This has increasingly come to be attributed to the cultural hegemony of the Roman ruling class. Rather than excluding the common people from the political process, the elite, it is now argued, was able to make sure that the part they played in politics would be broadly positive from its point of view. What follows is a critical examination of this thesis. I. Cultural factors and the power of the elite The debate on Roman “democracy” is inevitably infl uenced by oneʼs understanding of this loaded term, which is often strongly informed by modern democratic theory and experience. That modern political systems usually regarded as democratic include a considerable element of elite control and manipulation is of course a truism.2 How far-reaching, and, indeed, “undemocratic” the infl uence of this elitist element is, and what room it leaves for genuine popular participation – these are debatable points, both analytically and ideologically. Hence there can be no full agreement as to what it is we are looking for when we inquire about “democratic” features in the Roman Republic.
    [Show full text]