TRENTON" PRODUCTION in ILLINOIS by George V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TRENTON s IP Press Bulletin Series Kor the Oil and Gas Industry STATE OF ILLINOIS DWIGHT H. GREEN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION FRANK G. THOMPSON, Director DIVISION OF THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. M. LEIGHTON, Chief URBANA No. 39 ILLINOIS PETROLEUM September 13, 1941 "TRENTON" PRODUCTION IN ILLINOIS By George V. Cohee "Trenton" Producing Areas has produced both oil and gas since 1886. The total area of crude oil production is Soon after the discovery of oil in the 127,000 acres and that of natural gas Devonian limestone in some of the new 650,000 acres. Crude oil production in this pools in Illinois during 1940, interest was area from the "Trenton" to the end of centered on the possibilities of the "Tren- 1939 was 107,000,000 barrels, a recovery ton" limestone. This formation has pro- of 840 barrels per acre. Natural gas pro- duced oil for a number of years in the duction to the end of 1939 was 800 billion Westfield pool, Clark County, in south- cubic feet. 3 The producing zone was large- eastern Illinois, and in the Dupo and ly restricted to the upper 50 feet of the Waterloo pools, St. Clair and Monroe "Trenton" limestone. A. F. Melcher held counties, in southwestern Illinois. The that the "Trenton" in this area had suf- "Trenton" was successfully tested in the ficient primary porosity to permit move- Centralia pool in two wells during 1940. ment of fluids. He did not believe that Early in 1941 development of this forma- the cavities were sufficiently intercon- tion in the Salem pool was started. As of nected to permit the movement of fluids April 22, twenty-one "Trenton" wells for any great distances. 4 have been completed in this pool. These wells were deepened from the Devonian limestone. The "Trenton" limestone has Stratigraphic Position been tested in a number of small pools in Trenton limestone was first defined by the State and found to be unproductive L. Vanuxem in 1838 as the light gray or fig. 1). Production from this formation sparry limestone which forms the upper in Illinois so far has been limited to struc- mass of Trenton Falls, Oneida County, tures that have considerable closure. New York. It is underlain by dark or The principle "Trenton" producing black, almost compact limestone and area east of Mississippi River is the Lima- overlain by the black Ltica shale. The Indiana field which has produced oil and thickness of Trenton as first described was gas in considerable quantities from rocks from 10 to 125 feet. In 1842 Vanuxem de- of Ordovician age. Other than in Illinois fined Trenton limestone as to 300 feet small amounts of gas have been produced thick, practically repeated his 1838 de- from the "Trenton" in the Cumberland scription of its lithology, and called the saddle, southern Kentucky, and in Os- wego and Oneida counties, New York. 1 1 L?y, Henry A., Lima-Indiana District, Indiana and Ohio, in The Geology of Natural Gas: Am. Assdc. Petroleum The Lima-Indiana district extends Geologists, p. 852. 1935. through an area of about 12,000 square 2 Idem. 3 Esarey, R. E. and Fix. G. F., Oil and gas developments miles, only a small part of which produced in Indiana during 1939: Trans. A.I.M.E. vol. 136, p. 282, 2 1940. oil and gas. In Indiana the "Trenton" 1 Ley, Henry A., op. cit. [1] TRENTON" PRODUCTION IN ILLINOIS LEGEND 10 OIL AND GAS FIELDS ABANDONED FIELDS # "TRENTON" LIMESTONE PRODUCTION T "TRENTON" LIMESTONE TESTED SP ST. PETER SANDSTONE TESTED POOL AND COUNTY 1. WESTFIELD ; CLARK 2. MARTINSVILLE \ CLARK 3. SALEM ; MARION 4. CENTRALIA ; CLINTON, MARION 5. DUPO; ST. CLAIR 6. WATERLOO; MONROE 7. HERSCHER*; KANKAKEE * NOT COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION APRIL 15, 1941 Fig. 1. —Oil and gas fields in Illinois. Areas of "Trenton" production are shown in black, and fields in which "Trenton" or St. Peter strata were tested are indicated. Wildcat tests to "Trenton" or St. Peter are not shown. ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 3 3051 00005 0892 EARLY PRODUCTION i 2 4 5 6 WATERLOO DUPO CENTRALlA SALEM WESTFIELD MARTINSVILLE POOL POOL POOL POOL POOL POOL CLINTON, MONROE ST CLAIR MARION MARION CLARK CLARK DEPTH COUNTY DEPTH COUNTY DEPTH COUNTIES DEPTH COUNTY DEPTH COUNTY DEPTH COUNTY 260 l^~-1 45Fp?F^] 3807 tr _—J 4280 |~ —^1 2015 I^F H 2412 trZr-5 KIMMSWICK LEGEND I PRODUCING ZONE • UPPERMOST LIMIT OF OIL SHOWS AND SATURATION [=D SHALE ^3 SHALE, SILTY r^l SILTSTONE P^ LIMESTONE E3 LIMESTONE, DOLOMITIC E53 DOLOMITE f£pl DOLOMITE, CHERTY APRIL 15,194 Fig. 2. —Columnar sections of upper Ordovician strata in pools producing from the "Trenton" limestone in Illinois. underlying formation Black River lime- Early Production stone in which he included the Lowville of The first "Trenton" production in present nomenclature. This is the present Illinois, although non-commercial, was in commonly accepted definition, although sec. 32, T. 30 N., R. 10 E., Kankakee for many years most writers used Trenton County, at the south edge of Herscher, limestone to include not only the Trenton Illinois (fig. 1, no. 7). A number of wells proper but also all of the underlying Black were drilled to the "Trenton" in this area River group, whereas some writers used in 1900. Of these, nine were pumped for Trenton group, also Trenton formation eight months and then abandoned. The and Trenton limestone, to include the largest well produced less than one barrel Trenton proper, all of the Black River daily, some gas was produced with the group, and in some cases Chazy limestone oil. 7 The "Trenton" was reached at a also. 5 depth of 140 feet. Available subsurface The name "Trenton" as used in Illinois data are not enough to determine the de- includes all of the strata below the Ma- tailed structural conditions in this area, quoketa shale to the top of the Glenwood- although contours based on elevations of St. Peter sandstone. Production to date the top of bedrock suggest an anticlinal has been found only in the Kimmswick nose extending in a southwesterly direc- limestone, the upper member of the Mo- tion from the Kankakee arch. Several hawkian series that also includes the Plat- areas in northwestern Indiana along the tin formation. The Mohawkian series is Kankakee arch produced small amounts correlated with Trenton and Black River of oil from the "Trenton." 8 strata of the New York section. 6 7 Athey. L. F., Geology and mineral resources of the Herscher quadrangle: Illinois Gaol. Survey Bull. 55, pp. 5 Lexicon of Geologic N'ames of the United States: 109-110. 1928. U. S. Geol. Survey Bull. 896. pt. 2, p. 2179. 19J8. 8 Logan. W. N., Handbook of Indiana Geology, pt. 5, 6 Ekblaw. G. E., Personal communication. chap. 10, 1922. "TRENTON" PRODUCTION IN ILLINOIS 100 Ul rr a. < £D50 25 I o I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 M 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 YEARS Fig. 3. — Daily production at end of yearly intervals for a "Trenton" well in the Westfield pool, Clark County. Westfield Pool The wells are usually pumped only once a week. One well has produced for 20 first commercial production from The years, the other for 22 years. The average the "Trenton" limestone in Illinois was life of the "Trenton" wells at Westfield in Westfield near the pool, Clark County, has been 11 years. The average produc- the north end of the southeastern Illinois tion per well per day throughout the life fields (fig. 1, no. 1). The first well, drilled of each well was approximately 4 barrels. in 1910, was a small producer. The initial The recovery of crude oil from the "Tren- production of the well was 65 barrels and ton" limestone at Westfield is approxi- for the hours the production second 24 mately 800 barrels per acre. was 20 barrels. The depth of the produc- Production is obtained from the Kimm- ing zone was from 2,395 to 2,445 feet. The swick formation in the Westfield pool at well, which was abandoned ten years various depths throughout a zone aver- later, produced an estimated total of aging 90 feet in thickness (fig. 2). The 10,000 barrels during that time. zone consists of coarse dolomitic lime- The Westfield pool is located on a dome stone, fossiliferous, with clear calcite crys- on the axis of the LaSalle anticline. The tals. The average depth to the top of the principal producing formation is the "Trenton" is 2250 feet and to the top of Westfield limestone, correlated as the St. the "pay" 2340 feet. The "pay" is usually Louis-Salem limestones. The St. Louis encountered from 90 to 100 feet below the limestone, which thins over the top of the top of the limestone. Where the formation dome, averages 60 feet in thickness on contained oil in commercial quantity the top. wells had little or no water. The rate of closure, which amounts The "Trenton" the production suggests low porosity and feet, conforms closely to to at least 160 permeability of the producing zone. The that of the overlying Mississippian strata. 9 initial production averaged about 100 is limited structurally to the Production barrels per well and declined an average the structure. upper 50 feet at the top of of 72 per cent the second 24 hours. Within wells in the pool have pro- Thirteen 2 or 3 months the daily average produc- estimated total of 171,000 bar- duced an tion per well was 10 or 12 barrels. One rels of oil from the "Trenton." Two wells well completed in the field with an initial still average daily are producing with an production of 125 barrels was producing 3 barrels.
Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    (Sections) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This “Geologic Play Book for Utica Shale Appalachian Basin Exploration” (hereafter referred to as the “Utica Shale Play Book Study” or simply “Study”) represents the results of a two-year research effort by workers in five different states with the financial support of fifteen oil and gas industry partners. The Study was made possible through a coordinated effort between the Appalachian Basin Oil & Natural Gas Research Consortium (AONGRC) and the West Virginia University Shale Research, Education, Policy and Economic Development Center. The Study was funded by industry members of the Utica Shale Appalachian Basin Exploration Consortium (the Consortium). The 15 industry members of the Consortium were joined by individuals from four state geological surveys, two universities, one consulting company, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), who collectively comprised the Research Team members of the Consortium. This play book incorporates and integrates results of research conducted at various granularities, ranging from basin-scale stratigraphy and architecture to the creation of nano- porosity as gas was generated from organic matter in the reservoir. Between these two end members, the research team has mapped the thickness and distribution of the Utica and Point Pleasant formations using well logs; determined favorable reservoir facies through an examination of outcrops, cores and samples at the macroscopic and microscopic scales; identified the source of the total organic carbon (TOC) component in the shales and estimated the maturation level of the TOC; and searched for reservoir porosity utilizing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve
    In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan By Beth A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation Beth, A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves, 2007, Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michi- gan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1236, 78 p. Cover photographs Clockwise from upper left: Photograph of Pretty Lake by Gary Huffman. Photograph of a river in winter by Dan Wydra. Photographs of Lake Michigan and the Looking Glass River by Sharon Baltusis. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • United States National Museum Bulletin 262
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION MUSEUM O F NATURAL HISTORY For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 - Price 70 cents UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 262 Catalog of the Type Specimens of Invertebrate Fossils LOUIS R. PURNELL Part I: Paleozoic Cephalopoda SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. 1968 Publications of the United States National Museum The scientific publications of the United States National Museum in- clude two series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National Museum Bulletin. In these series are published original articles and monographs dealing with the collections and work of the Museum and setting forth newly ac- quired facts in the field of anthropology, biology, geology, history, and technology. Copies of each publication are distributed to libraries and scientific organizations and to specialists and others interested in the various subjects. The Proceedings, begun in 1878, are intended for the publication, in separate form, of shorter papers. These are gathered in volumes, octavo in size, with the publication date of each paper recorded in the table of contents of the volume. In the Bulletin series, the first of which was issued in 1875, appear longer, separate publications consisting of monographs (occasionally in several parts) and volumes in which are collected works on related sub- jects. Bulletins are either octavo or quarto in size, depending on the the needs of the presentation. Since 1902, papers relating to the botanical collections of the Museum have been published in the Bulletin series under the heading Contributions from the United States National Herbarium.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Collingwood Mb., Lindsay Fm., Stratigraphy and Oil Shale Potential
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • B2150-B FRONT Final
    Bedrock Geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri By W. John Nelson THE PADUCAH CUSMAP QUADRANGLE: RESOURCE AND TOPICAL INVESTIGATIONS Martin B. Goldhaber, Project Coordinator T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2150–B R I A N P T E E R D . I O S . R A joint study conducted in collaboration with the Illinois State Geological U Survey, the Indiana Geological Survey, the Kentucky Geological Survey, and the Missouri M 9 Division of Geology and Land Survey A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nelson, W. John Bedrock geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky, and Missouri / by W. John Nelson. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2150–B) (The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:2150–B 1. Geology—Middle West. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B QE75.B9 no. 2150–B [QE78.7] [557.3 s—dc21 97–7724 [557.7] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Type Kinderhook Ammonoids
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 80 Number Article 6 1973 Type Kinderhook Ammonoids W. M. Furnish University of Iowa Walter L. Manger University of Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1973 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Furnish, W. M. and Manger, Walter L. (1973) "Type Kinderhook Ammonoids," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 80(1), 15-24. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol80/iss1/6 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Furnish and Manger: Type Kinderhook Ammonoids 15 Type Kinderhook Ammonoids W. M. FURNISH1 and WALTER L. MANGER FURNISH, W. M. and WALTER L. MANGER. Type Kinderhook Am­ and the associated conodont faunal data. The Kinderhookian monoids. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 80( 1): 15-24, 1973. Wassonville Member of the Hampton Formation in southeastern SYNOPSIS: Lower Mississippian rocks in the type area of North Iowa and the Chouteau Limestone of Missouri fall within the America have produced only a few scattered ammonoid cephalo­ lower "Pericyclus-Stufe" of the upper Tournaisian Stage as these pods. Those specimens from southeastern Iowa and northwestern units are designated for the early Lower Carboniferous of Western Missouri lie within the general vicinity of the designated type Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Development Opportunities in the Utica Shale Play in Consideration of the Geographic Alignment of the Fairway
    Business Development Opportunities in the Utica Shale Play in Consideration of the Geographic Alignment of the Fairway Defining Business Opportunities within a Geographic Footprint Jim Scherrer, Energy Resources Director Geologic Analysis November 2015 The purpose of this document is to highlight the current business development opportunities that arise across the breadth of the Utica Shale fairway. The oil and gas resources underlying the Marcellus from within the “Utica Shale” play have become better defined through the shale resource exploration and recovery operations of various exploration and production (E&P) Above: The “tiramisu model” companies. The geographic alignment is unique and now is provides a visualization of the better defined; offering opportunities for business horizontal drilling taking place in development that aligns with the geography of the fairway. shale repositories worldwide. Additionally, boundaries such as the “Line of Death” for economic quantities of oil and gas within the play have been better delineated. More recent test drilling within the Appalachian Basin below the Marcellus (Devonian Period), in stratigraphy generally known as the “Utica” (Ordovician Period), there has been a resurgence of activity as this carbon-rich play has yielded unexpected, very positive results. This Utica formation assessment also includes the Point Pleasant formation. Taury Smith (NY State Geological Survey) says the Utica Shale play is more appropriately called the “Utica Shale and associated organic‐rich calcareous shale and interbedded limestone and shale play.” This report relies on many sources, but primarily the Utica Shale Appalachian Basin Exploration Consortium (the Consortium). The 15 members of the Consortium were joined by individuals from four state geological surveys, two universities, one consulting company, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Peninsula
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN. For this object I have zealously worked. How far I have succeeded in the effort the reader may judge; and I shall feel well satisfied if he finds the picture I give worth UPPER PENINSULA attentive study, without having it surrounded by a 1869-1873 borrowed glistening frame, composed of a collection of ACCOMPANIED BY AN items from almost every branch of human knowledge. ATLAS OF MAPS. Very respectfully yours, C. ROMINGER. VOL. I. PART III. PALÆOZOIC ROCKS. INTRODUCTION. BY DR. C. ROMINGER BY the Legislative Assembly of 1871, the continuation of a geological survey of the State of Michigan was determined upon, in such a manner as to divide the work PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE OF into three districts, each of which was to be investigated MICHIGAN. independently by different parties. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. The third district, intrusted to me, comprises the Lower Peninsula, and the eastern half of the Upper Peninsula, NEW YORK or that portion which Is not included in the iron and JULIUS BIEN copper regions. Its surface rock is exclusively 1873 composed of members of the palæozoic series; while In Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1873, by the other two, older crystalline and metamorphic rocks GOVERNOR J. J. BAGLEY, prevail. for the State of Michigan, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. On the Lower Peninsula only a partial reconnoissance TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF tour has been made through Little Traverse Bay region.
    [Show full text]
  • Utica Shale Play Geology Review
    Utica Shale Play Geology review April 2017 Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy www.eia.gov Washington, DC 20585 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the U.S. Department of Energy or other federal agencies EIA author contact: Dr. Olga Popova Email: [email protected] U.S. Energy Information Administration | Utica Shale Play i April 2017 Introduction The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is adding and updating geologic information and maps of the major tight formations and shale plays for the continental United States. This document outlines updated information and maps for the Utica shale play of the Appalachian basin. The geologic features characterized include a contoured elevation of the formation top (structure), contoured thickness (isopach), paleogeography elements, and tectonic structures (regional faults and folds, etc.), as well as play boundaries, well location, and initial GOR (gas-to-oil ratio) of wells producing from January 2004 through December 2016. EIA integrates these geologic elements into a series of maps. The Utica play map consists of layers of geologic and production information that users can view either as separate thematic maps (such as Figure 1) or as interactive layers of the U.S. Energy Mapping System. Additional map layers may be added if additional geologic data (such as petrophysical and thermodynamic formation properties) become available.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Appalachia's Utica/Point Pleasant and Marcellus Formations
    Analysis of Appalachia’s Utica/Point Pleasant and Marcellus Formations’ Geology on Estimated Ultimate Recovery Nicholas Cuaresma and Brittany Martin 2019, Marietta College Cuaresma and Martin 2 Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify the optimum horizontal wellbore azimuths in the Ordovician Utica/Point Pleasant Formation and Devonian Marcellus Formation unconventional petroleum plays in three locations in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, from data contributed by Knobloch Petroleum of Marietta, Ohio. The assumption was that the stress state in the crust determined both the orientations of natural hydraulic fractures formed during the Pennsylvanian Alleghanian orogeny would control the orientation of the fractures formed during present day hydraulic fracturing of horizontal wells. Therefore, the orientation of the horizontal wellbores with respect to fracture orientations would affect the estimated ultimate recovery of petroleum. Multivariable regression analyses, with estimated ultimate recovery as the dependent variable and amount of water used during hydraulic fracturing, amount of sand used as a fracture proppant, and the horizontal wellbore azimuth as the independent variables, were run using data from 1400 wells. A brief overview of the geology of the Appalachian basin, the basin in which both the Utica/Point Pleasant and Marcellus formations were deposited, along with an explanation of the conditions under which natural hydraulic fracturing occurs were included in the study. The study concluded that the amount of water used during hydraulic fracturing in Ohio has the largest effect on the estimated ultimate recovery and the amount of sand used as a fracture proppant in Pennsylvania and West Virginia a numerically large effect on the estimated ultimate recovery, whereas the orientation (azimuth) of the wellbore appears to have an insignificant effect.
    [Show full text]