LACEBARK PINE (Pinus Bungeana)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LACEBARK PINE (Pinus Bungeana) LACEBARK PINE (Pinus bungeana) By Kris R. Bachtell As those of us who enjoy working with plants settle in for another undoubtedly cold and long midwestern winter, we are more appreciative of plants like lacebark pine that offer their best ornamental features dur­ ing this time of year. Most of us turn to evergreens, both needled and broad-leaved types, when considering plants for winter interest. In addi­ tion to foliage, attractive bark should be one of the first features consid­ ered in the selection of useful "winter landscape" plants. Unlike many other ornamental features, bark becomes more prominent and visibile as trees become larger. Trees can be particularly attractive during the winter months when the low sun illuminates their bark. This, coupled with the contrast of snow and ice that frequently cling to the bark and limbs, can The bark of lacebark pine (Pinus create quite striking results. bungeana) is its most attractive fea ­ ture. Specimens are usually multi­ stemmed. Ornamental Features Lacebark pine has perhaps the most attractive bark of any evergreen tree hardy in the Chicago area. Irregular whitish and cinnamon-brown patches develop all along the young, olive-green stems. On the trunk and larger limbs, these plates, approximately one- to four-inches in size, cre­ ate an affect that is somewhat similar to that of planetree (Platanus X aceri­ folia), a deciduous tree planted frequently in the eastern United States and Europe. However, the bark affect is even more striking on lacebark pine because specimens are usually multi-stemmed, with numerous branches originating from near the base of the plant. The two- to four-inch long needles of lacebark pine are medium to dark green and quite glossy. They are rather stiff to the touch and differ from those of most other pines. They are borne strictly in groups of three, rather than in groups of two, as with Austrian and Scots pines, or in groups of five, as with eastern white pine. The branchlets are reportedly somewhat brittle, although the Arboretum's specimens have not been particularly prone to breakage during ice storms. The cones are approxi­ mately two to three inches long, slightly less in width. 54 Observations in China Of all the plants we observed during the Arboretum-sponsored trip to northern China during the fall of 1990, the lacebark pine was one of the most impressive. It was the first plant we observed when we arrived at the Beijing International Airport. While surveying the airport grounds as we waited for our Chinese hosts to pick us up, we examined a group of these trees along the median between the terminal and the main parking lot. As we drove away from the airport, we observed numerous mass plantings of lacebark pine along our way. Throughout the Beijing area, lacebark pine is a popular landscape tree, and the mass plantings may have been nurseries to provide plants for other areas of the city. At several of the historic temples we visited, lace bark pine was planted in prominent locations, often bordering busy pedestrian walkways. It is so popular in Beijing that we even found it planted in small sidewalk containers in front of major department stores. Due to extensive deforestation, it is not nearly as common as a wild plant as it once was. We observed remnant native populations in pre­ This early rendition of lacebark pine serves, temple grounds, and in locations where the terrain was too depicts the unique, stiff needles that treacherous to harvest trees for lumber or to cultivate the land for crops. distinguish it from most other pines. Lacebark pine persists in remnant native populations in China. This is an early photo by E. H. Wilson, who col­ lected plants in western China for the Arnold Arboretum in 1907-1910. 55 We observed plants and collected seed from a large population of lacebark pines in Shanxi province, a few hundred miles southwest of Beijing, on the Mountain of the Heavenly Dragon. It occurs at an elevation of 5,000- 5,500 feet, on the southwest-facing flank of the mountain, co-dominant with Oriental arborvitae (Thuja orientalis) and Chinese hard pine (Pinus tabulaeformis), both on gentle slopes and around the cliffs. Landscape Use Lacebark pine has proven fully hardy in the Chicago area and in Madison, Wisconsin. As with most pines, this species grows best in well­ drained soils and full sunlight. Siting it in poorly drained soil or flood­ prone sites can be lethal. Flooding during 1987, in the Woody Plants of China collection on the Arboretum's east side, killed one of the two oldest specimens at the Arboretum. The other specimen is declining and may die. With the valuable insight into its native habitat that we gained in China, we recently planted new specimens in locations that should prove more favorable for healthy growth. Despite becoming a large tree when mature, lacebark pine grows slowly enough, usually less than a half a foot each year, for it to be consid­ ered for residential use. The ailing, flood-damaged, 39-year-old speci­ men at the Arboretum is just 17 feet tall. Because of this slow growth, one must wait patiently for the attractive bark character to develop. This fea­ ture does not usually develop until the plant surpasses six feet in height. The uniform oval habit of young and middle-aged specimens further justifies the use of this tree in residential landscapes. The ascending branch structure limits the spread of the plant and makes it useful at the corner of a residence, as a specimen in a shrub border, or as a patio tree. When used as a patio plant, the lacy bark can be observed closely throughout the year. The form remains oval until the tree exceeds 25 feet in height. Older, maturing specimens tend to become more rounded, as the weight of branches causes a more horizontal orientation to the limbs. Several specimens observed in China that our guides said were several hundred years old were over 40 feet in height, with an even wider spread. In the United States, lacebark pine is still quite rare. Most large speci­ mens are located in arboreta, botanical gardens, and on university cam­ puses. Both the Morris Arboretum in Philadelphia and the Ohio State University campus in Columbus have magnificent old specimens. The Chicago Botanic Garden has a young specimen well-sited in the Krasberg Rose Garden that is beginning to develop the showy bark character. Locating locally grown trees for purchase in the Chicago area is some­ what difficult. Only a few nurseries in northern Illinois offer lacebark 56 pine, although a number of specialty conifer growers on the west coast grow this plant. Your local garden center could special order a plant for you. With careful, proper siting of young lacebark pines in the Arboretum, their outstanding bark character will develop for all interested visitors to view and enjoy. This magnificent specimen of lacebark pine is growing at the Morris Arbore­ tum in Philadelphia. 57 .
Recommended publications
  • Pines in the Arboretum
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MtJ ARBORETUM REVIEW No. 32-198 PETER C. MOE Pines in the Arboretum Pines are probably the best known of the conifers native to The genus Pinus is divided into hard and soft pines based on the northern hemisphere. They occur naturally from the up­ the hardness of wood, fundamental leaf anatomy, and other lands in the tropics to the limits of tree growth near the Arctic characteristics. The soft or white pines usually have needles in Circle and are widely grown throughout the world for timber clusters of five with one vascular bundle visible in cross sec­ and as ornamentals. In Minnesota we are limited by our cli­ tions. Most hard pines have needles in clusters of two or three mate to the more cold hardy species. This review will be with two vascular bundles visible in cross sections. For the limited to these hardy species, their cultivars, and a few hy­ discussion here, however, this natural division will be ignored brids that are being evaluated at the Arboretum. and an alphabetical listing of species will be used. Where neces­ Pines are readily distinguished from other common conifers sary for clarity, reference will be made to the proper groups by their needle-like leaves borne in clusters of two to five, of particular species. spirally arranged on the stem. Spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies), Of the more than 90 species of pine, the following 31 are or for example, bear single leaves spirally arranged. Larch (Larix) have been grown at the Arboretum. It should be noted that and true cedar (Cedrus) bear their leaves in a dense cluster of many of the following comments and recommendations are indefinite number, whereas juniper (Juniperus) and arborvitae based primarily on observations made at the University of (Thuja) and their related genera usually bear scalelikie or nee­ Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and plant performance dlelike leaves that are opposite or borne in groups of three.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Native Trees and Large Shrubs for the Washington, D.C. Area
    Green Spring Gardens 4603 Green Spring Rd ● Alexandria ● VA 22312 Phone: 703-642-5173 ● TTY: 703-803-3354 www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/greenspring NON - NATIVE TREES AND LARGE SHRUBS ­ FOR THE WASHINGTON, D.C. AREA ­ Non-native trees are some of the most beloved plants in the landscape due to their beauty. In addition, these trees are grown for the shade, screening, structure, and landscape benefits they provide. Deciduous trees, whose leaves die and fall off in the autumn, are valuable additions to landscapes because of their changing interest throughout the year. Evergreen trees are valued for their year-round beauty and shelter for wildlife. Evergreens are often grouped into two categories, broadleaf evergreens and conifers. Broadleaf evergreens have broad, flat leaves. They also may have showy flowers, such as Camellia oleifera (a large shrub), or colorful fruits, such as Nellie R. Stevens holly. Coniferous evergreens either have needle-like foliage, such as the lacebark pine, or scale-like foliage, such as the green giant arborvitae. Conifers do not have true flowers or fruits but bear cones. Though most conifers are evergreen, exceptions exist. Dawn redwood, for example, loses its needles each fall. The following are useful definitions: Cultivar (cv.) - a cultivated variety designated by single quotes, such as ‘Autumn Gold’. A variety (var.) or subspecies (subsp.), in contrast, is found in nature and is a subdivision of a species (a variety of Cedar of Lebanon is listed). Full Shade - the amount of light under a dense deciduous tree canopy or beneath evergreens. Full Sun - at least 6 hours of sun daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Disturbances Influence Trait Evolution in Pinus
    Master's Thesis Diversify or specialize: Disturbances influence trait evolution in Pinus Supervision by: Prof. Dr. Elena Conti & Dr. Niklaus E. Zimmermann University of Zurich, Institute of Systematic Botany & Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Landscape Dynamics Bianca Saladin October 2013 Front page: Forest of Pinus taeda, northern Florida, 1/2013 Table of content 1 STRONG PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN PINE TRAITS 5 1.1 ABSTRACT 5 1.2 INTRODUCTION 5 1.3 MATERIAL AND METHODS 8 1.3.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 8 1.3.2 TRAIT DATA 9 1.3.3 PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL 9 1.4 RESULTS 11 1.4.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 11 1.4.2 PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL 12 1.5 DISCUSSION 14 1.5.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 14 1.5.2 PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL 16 1.6 CONCLUSION 17 1.7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17 1.8 REFERENCES 19 2 THE ROLE OF FIRE IN TRIGGERING DIVERSIFICATION RATES IN PINE SPECIES 21 2.1 ABSTRACT 21 2.2 INTRODUCTION 21 2.3 MATERIAL AND METHODS 24 2.3.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 24 2.3.2 DIVERSIFICATION RATE 24 2.4 RESULTS 25 2.4.1 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 25 2.4.2 DIVERSIFICATION RATE 25 2.5 DISCUSSION 29 2.5.1 DIVERSIFICATION RATE IN RESPONSE TO FIRE ADAPTATIONS 29 2.5.2 DIVERSIFICATION RATE IN RESPONSE TO DISTURBANCE, STRESS AND PLEIOTROPIC COSTS 30 2.5.3 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE ANALYSIS PATHWAY 33 2.5.4 PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE 34 2.6 CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK 34 2.7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 35 2.8 REFERENCES 36 3 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 39 3.1 S1 - ACCESSION NUMBERS OF GENE SEQUENCES 40 3.2 S2 - TRAIT DATABASE 44 3.3 S3 - SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MAPS 58 3.4 S4 - DISTRIBUTION OF TRAITS OVER PHYLOGENY 81 3.5 S5 - PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL OF 19 BIOCLIM VARIABLES 84 3.6 S6 – COMPLETE LIST OF REFERENCES 85 2 Introduction to the Master's thesis The aim of my master's thesis was to assess trait and niche evolution in pines within a phylogenetic comparative framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Key to the Pines
    ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 11I NOVE~IBER 9, 1JJ1 NUMBER9 SIMPLE KEY TO THE PINES (Native or available from nurseries in the United States) simple key is offered chiefly for the benefit of the amateur gardener who THISis frequently confronted with keys which he finds unnecessarily complicated. The key is based primarily on foliage characters which, in most cases, can be ob- served without the use of a hand lens. It should be clearly understood that any key based primarily on the length of the leaves (and this key is just that) is open to serious criticism because the length of the leaves of any plant will vary with the individual as well as with soil, age and climate variations, disease infestations and altitude at which the tree is growing. Other plant characters vary likewise. However, in order to assist the gardener who has an interest in pines, this key is offered in spite of just such criticism. It includes only those pines which one is likely to find in the woods or nurseries of this country. A few native species have been omitted because they occur only in limited areas, and many exotic species are omitted because they have not yet been widely distributed in culti- vation. It goes without saying that the more species included in a key, the more complicated that key becomes. There are about 80 species of pines distributed throughout the northern hemi- sphere, 27 of which are growing in the Arnold Arboretum.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistletoes of North American Conifers
    United States Department of Agriculture Mistletoes of North Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station American Conifers General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-98 September 2002 Canadian Forest Service Department of Natural Resources Canada Sanidad Forestal SEMARNAT Mexico Abstract _________________________________________________________ Geils, Brian W.; Cibrián Tovar, Jose; Moody, Benjamin, tech. coords. 2002. Mistletoes of North American Conifers. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS–GTR–98. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 123 p. Mistletoes of the families Loranthaceae and Viscaceae are the most important vascular plant parasites of conifers in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Species of the genera Psittacanthus, Phoradendron, and Arceuthobium cause the greatest economic and ecological impacts. These shrubby, aerial parasites produce either showy or cryptic flowers; they are dispersed by birds or explosive fruits. Mistletoes are obligate parasites, dependent on their host for water, nutrients, and some or most of their carbohydrates. Pathogenic effects on the host include deformation of the infected stem, growth loss, increased susceptibility to other disease agents or insects, and reduced longevity. The presence of mistletoe plants, and the brooms and tree mortality caused by them, have significant ecological and economic effects in heavily infested forest stands and recreation areas. These effects may be either beneficial or detrimental depending on management objectives. Assessment concepts and procedures are available. Biological, chemical, and cultural control methods exist and are being developed to better manage mistletoe populations for resource protection and production. Keywords: leafy mistletoe, true mistletoe, dwarf mistletoe, forest pathology, life history, silviculture, forest management Technical Coordinators_______________________________ Brian W. Geils is a Research Plant Pathologist with the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Flagstaff, AZ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Cavitation Resistance in Conifers Maximilian Larter
    The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Maximilian Larter To cite this version: Maximilian Larter. The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers. Bioclimatology. Univer- sit´ede Bordeaux, 2016. English. <NNT : 2016BORD0103>. <tel-01375936> HAL Id: tel-01375936 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01375936 Submitted on 3 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. THESE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITE DE BORDEAUX Spécialité : Ecologie évolutive, fonctionnelle et des communautés Ecole doctorale: Sciences et Environnements Evolution de la résistance à la cavitation chez les conifères The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Maximilian LARTER Directeur : Sylvain DELZON (DR INRA) Co-Directeur : Jean-Christophe DOMEC (Professeur, BSA) Soutenue le 22/07/2016 Devant le jury composé de : Rapporteurs : Mme Amy ZANNE, Prof., George Washington University Mr Jordi MARTINEZ VILALTA, Prof., Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona Examinateurs : Mme Lisa WINGATE, CR INRA, UMR ISPA, Bordeaux Mr Jérôme CHAVE, DR CNRS, UMR EDB, Toulouse i ii Abstract Title: The evolution of cavitation resistance in conifers Abstract Forests worldwide are at increased risk of widespread mortality due to intense drought under current and future climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Summary List and Discussion of Single Fossils. Small Fossil Set Additional Fossils of the Large Fossil
    A. Summary list and discussion of single fossils. Small fossil set - Pinus baileyi. 45 Ma; stem section Pinus - Pinus canariensis. 12.8 Ma; stem P. canariensis - P. roxburghii (clade) - Pinus crossii. 27 Ma; stem subsection Balfourianae - Pinus densiflora. 1.1 Ma; P. densiflora – P. sylvestris divergence - Pinus florissantii. 34 Ma; stem subsection Strobus - Pinus fujiii. 15 Ma; stem MRCA of P. kesiya and P. tabuliformis - Pinus haboroensis. 65 Ma; stem subgenus Pinus - Pinus halepensis. 12.8 Ma; P. halepensis – P. brutia divergence - Pinus hazenii. 5 Ma; P. coulteri – P. sabiniana divergence - Pinus prekesiya. 5.3 Ma; P. yunnanensis – P. kesiya divergence - Pinus radiata. 0.4 Ma; P. radiata – P. muricata divergence - Pinus storeyana. 12 Ma; stem or within Attenuatae clade - Pinus triphylla. 90 Ma; stem subgenus Pinus - Pinus yorkshirensis. 129 Ma; stem Pinus Additional fossils of the large fossil set - Pinus delmarensis. 38 Ma; stem subsection Strobus - Pinus lindgrenii. 6 Ma; MRCA of P. edulis - P. johannis clade - Pinus premassoniana. 5.3 Ma; stem of P. massoniana - Pinus riogrande. 27.2 Ma; Ponderosae clade - Pinus sanjuanensis. 27 Ma; stem of subsection Cembroides - Pinus truckeensis. 12 Ma; subsection Ponderosae within P. ponderosa - clade - Pinus weasmaii. 3 Ma; stem of P. contorta Genus Pinus Pinus yorkshirensis Location: Wealden Formation, NE England Age: 131-129 Ma. Discussion: These are the earliest well-dated cones that belong to the genus Pinus, based on internal anatomy and external morphology, such as the presence of cone scales with apophyses and umbos, features unique to Pinus among extant Pinaceae (Ryberg et al., 2012). Another early representative from the Wealden Formation (P.
    [Show full text]
  • Araucaria Angustifolia Chloroplast Genome Sequence and Its Relation to Other Araucariaceae”
    Genetics and Molecular Biology (2019) Supplementary Material to “Araucaria angustifolia chloroplast genome sequence and its relation to other Araucariaceae” Table S1 - List of 58 Pinidae complete chloroplast genomes used in chloroplast genome assembling of Araucaria angustifolia No. Taxon GenBank accession number Study 1 Abies koreana KP742350.1 (Yi et al., 2016b) 2 Abies nephrolepis KT834974.1 (Yi et al., 2016a) 3 Agathis dammara AB830884.1 (Wu and Chaw 2014) 4 Amentotaxus argotaenia KR780582.1 (Li et al., 2015a) 5 Calocedrus formosana AB831010.1 (Wu and Chaw, 2014) 6 Cathaya argyrophylla AB547400.1 (Lin et al., 2010) 7 Cedrus deodara NC_014575.1 (Lin et al., 2010) 8 Cephalotaxus oliveri KC136217.1 (Yi et al., 2013) 9 Cryptomeria japônica AP009377.1 (Hirao et al., 2008) 10 Cunninghamia lanceolata KC427270.1 - 11 Cupressus gigantea KT315754.1 (Li et al., 2016a) 12 Glyptostrobus pensilis KU302768.1 (Hao et al., 2016) 13 Juniperus bermudiana KF866297.1 (Guo et al., 2014) 14 Juniperus cedrus KT378453.1 (Guo et al., 2016) 15 Juniperus monosperma KF866298.1 (Guo et al., 2014) 16 Juniperus scopulorum KF866299.1 (Guo et al., 2014) 17 Juniperus virginiana KF866300.1 (Guo et al., 2014) 18 Keteleeria davidiana NC_011930.1 (Wu et al., 2009) 19 Larix decídua AB501189.1 (Wu et al., 2011) 20 Metasequoia glyptostroboides KR061358.1 (Chen et al., 2015) 21 Nageia nagi AB830885.1 (Wu and Chaw, 2014) 22 Picea abies HF937082.1 (Nystedt et al., 2013) 23 Picea glauca KT634228.1 (Jackman et al., 2015) 24 Picea jezoensis KT337318.1 (Yang et al., 2016) 25 Picea morrisonicola AB480556.1 (Wu et al., 2011) 26 Picea sitchensis EU998739.3 (Cronn et al., 2008) 27 Picea sitchensis KU215903.2 (Coombe et al., 2016) 28 Pinus armandii KP412541.1 (Li et al., 2015b) 29 Pinus bungeana KR873010.1 (Li et al., 2015c) 30 Pinus contorta EU998740.4 (Cronn et al., 2008) 31 Pinus fenzeliana var.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Seed Dormancy in Pinus Bungeana Zucc. Ex Endl.: Understanding the Contributions of Enclosing Tissues and Temperature on Germination
    Article Investigating Seed Dormancy in Pinus bungeana Zucc. ex Endl.: Understanding the Contributions of Enclosing Tissues and Temperature on Germination Congcong Guo 1,2 ID , Yongbao Shen 2,3,4,* and Fenghou Shi 2,3,4 1 College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; [email protected] 2 Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; [email protected] 3 Southern Tree Seed Inspection Center, National Forestry Administration, Nanjing 210037, China 4 College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-25-85427403; Fax: +86-25-85427402 Received: 21 May 2018; Accepted: 3 July 2018; Published: 4 July 2018 Abstract: Pinus bungeana Zucc. ex Endl. is an endangered conifer tree species that is endemic to Western Central China. With the aim to confirm whether the Pinus bungeana seeds were dormant or not, an isolated embryo was cultured and seed coat interference with imbibition was examined by the water uptake test; the contribution of enclosing structures to germination inhibition and the effect of different temperatures (10 ◦C, 15 ◦C, 20 ◦C, 25 ◦C, and 30 ◦C) on seed germination were investigated by the germination test, then total germination percentage (TGP) and mean germination time (MGT) were calculated. Results showed that the Pinus bungeana seeds were non-dormant, seeds without any prechilling treatment germinated readily and achieved high germination (approximately 90%) at favorable temperatures (15 and 20 ◦C). At 25 ◦C, seed germination was inhibited and intact seeds exhibited 5% germination, but an interference with imbibition was not responsible for this result.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirr, Michael A. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants: Their Identification, Ornamental Characteristics, Culture, Propagation and Uses
    Plant Profiles: HORT 2242 Landscape Plants II Botanical Name: Pinus bungeana Common Name: lacebark pine Family Name: Pinaceae – pine family General Description: Pinus bungeana is a slow growing pine known for its outstanding bark. The bark is a beautiful mixture of green, cream, and cinnamon colors reminiscent of sycamore (planetree) bark. Specimens can be found in arboreta and specialty gardens in the Chicago area but it is not commonly used as a landscape plant. Our heavy, wet soils limit broad use of this plant but should not deter one from planting it in their own garden as its beauty is beyond compare. Zone: 4(5)-7 Resources Consulted: Dirr, Michael A. Manual of Woody Landscape Plants: Their Identification, Ornamental Characteristics, Culture, Propagation and Uses. Champaign: Stipes, 2009. Print. Creator: Julia Fitzpatrick-Cooper, Professor, College of DuPage Creation Date: 2014 Keywords/Tags: Pinaceae, tree, conifer, cone, needle, evergreen, Pinus bungeana, lacebark pine Whole plant/Habit: Description: Pinus bungeana is pyramidal when young often with multiple trunks or branching near the base of the trunk. Image Source: Karren Wcisel, TreeTopics.com Image Date: April 21, 2007 Image File Name: lacebark_pine_0991.png Whole plant/Habit: Description: As lacebark pine matures it becomes more open and round in form. This photograph illustrates the start of that process. Image Source: Karren Wcisel, TreeTopics.com Image Date: August 10, 2008 Image File Name: lacebark_pine_2575.png Bark: Description: The bark is a beautiful mosaic of green, silver, cream, cinnamon, and sometimes purple. The wider range of color becomes more pronounced as the tree becomes more open to the sun with age.
    [Show full text]
  • Lacebark Pine, Pinus Bungeana
    Lacebark Pine, Pinus bungeana Alex X. Niemiera, Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture Summary Foliage: About 3 inches long; 3 needles per fascicle; stiff; evergreen Height: About 40 feet Spread: About 25 feet Shape: Conical in youth, irregular with age Main Features Lacebark pine is a medium (sometimes large) conifer species that has strikingly beautiful bark. Bark is a camouflage-like patchwork of greens, silvery-white, creams, browns, and red-browns. There is a great amount of tree to tree variation in bark color; patchwork of colors begins to appear on approximately 2 inch diameter branches. Lacebark pine usually produces several main trunks which can be an asset since more trunks embellishes the showy bark characteristic. However, this multiple trunk tendency is also a liability since multiple trunks are not as sturdy as a single trunk, and multi-trunk trees are susceptible to snow and ice damage. The extra weight of snow and ice on branches will cause them to split away from the main (or large) trunks. Plant Needs Zone: 5 to 7 Light: Full sun Moisture: Average to somewhat dry Soil type: Average pH range: Acid Functions This species can certainly be used as a specimen tree (has sufficiently notable attributes to be used as a focal point) in a garden or landscape. Care Trees may be pruned at an early age to develop a single trunk. This species has relatively few pest problems. Additional Information Lacebark pine is purported to have a slow growth rate, but I have found that under average conditions (minimum of stressful conditions) that a medium growth rate (1 to 2 feet per year) can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • MF3423 Conifer Trees for Kansas: a Guide to Landscape Evergreens
    Conifer Trees for Kansas A Guide to Landscape Evergreens Jason Griffin Ornamental Tree and Shrub Specialist Director, John C. Pair Horticultural Center and Tim McDonnell Community Forestry Program Coordinator Kansas Forest Service Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension System 1 Evergreen plants continue to be an important part the conifers that can be grown in Kansas. This guide of the landscape in Kansas and throughout the Great focuses on the most common species and cultivars, but Plains. They offer year-round color, screen unsightly these plants are not recommended for all locations. For views, provide wildlife habitat, and serve as windbreaks. instance, a species might perform well as a screen in a Maintaining healthy evergreen plantings in Kansas suburban or urban landscape in eastern Kansas, but might requires proper planning, knowledge, skill and follow-up not survive in a farmstead windbreak in central or western care. Environmental stress factors increase susceptibility Kansas. When in doubt, ask your local extension agent or to disease and insect infestation. nursery professional for a recommendation. In Kansas, soil moisture should be managed year- Plant descriptions provide the following details: round, particularly during the winter. On sunny • Botanical name currently accepted and the most winter days, the leaves warm and plants begin to lose frequently used common name. moisture through transpiration. Desiccation or winter • Region(s) where the species can be expected to burn occurs when ground is frozen or soil moisture perform well with normal care and maintenance. is inadequate. Watering conifers during a warm spell • Estimated height and width. Individual plants can in the winter is recommended.
    [Show full text]