DOCSLIB.ORG

“Fearless Girl”? Or Can She Not Be Owned by Anyone?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Fearless Girl”? Or Can She Not Be Owned by Anyone? advertising | marketing | media | trade marks WHO OWNS THE RIGHTS TO THE “FEARLESS GIRL”? OR CAN SHE NOT BE OWNED BY ANYONE? By Winnie Lok, Solicitor 7 January 2020 In the lead up to International Women’s Day in 2017, US investment firm State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) Commissioned artist Kristen Visbal to Create the statue of the “Fearless Girl” to promote the firm’s support of gender diversity and women in leadership, and it was initially plaCed across from Wall Street’s ‘charging bull’ statue in a show of strength and defiance. An overnight sensation, the Fearless Girl made headlines across the world for her representation of female empowerment. The statue now resides in front of the NY stock exchange. SinCe the first statue’s creation, Visbal has gone on to Create repliCas of the Fearless Girl whiCh have appeared in Los Angeles, Oslo, London and most reCently, Federation Square in Melbourne. Now the Fearless Girl is making headlines for other reasons. In response to the repliCas, SSGA is claiming that they own the image and name of the Fearless Girl and have brought proceedings against Visbal in the New York State Supreme Court alleging breach of contract and violation of their trade mark and Copyright in the Fearless Girl. The US firm is also suing Australian law firm, MauriCe BlaCkburn, who Commissioned the Melbourne statue, in the Australian Federal Court citing similar breaches of their intellectual property rights. The ongoing legal battles raise many intelleCtual property Considerations to unpaCk and ultimately begs the question: who “owns” the Fearless Girl? Copyright Ownership Under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), the copyright owner of an artistic work (suCh as a sCulpture or statue) is generally the author i.e. the Creator. Based on this alone, it is easy to make the quiCk assumption that because Visbal sculpted the Fearless Girl, she must be the copyright owner. However, the Copyright Act also allows for copyright to be assigned or licensed. Assignment and exclusive licence must be in writing and signed by or on behalf of the copyright owner in order to take effeCt. A Common misunderstanding is that if a person Commissions a work, they have paid for it and therefore, automatically become the copyright owner in every instanCe. In limited CircumstanCes, a person is automatically the Copyright owner of an artistiC work if the artistiC work is a photograph for private or domestic use (e.g. family portraits or wedding photos), or a painting or drawing of a portrait. However, unless otherwise specified in writing, the owner of any other commissioned artistic work (such as a sculpture or statue) is the author. The person who has Commissioned the work can use the work only for the purpose for which it was commissioned - i.e. they are granted a licenCe, but ownership remains with the author unless assigned in writing. Given that the terms of the agreement between SSGA and Visbal are largely confidential, it is difficult to determine who is the copyright owner and if copyright ownership was not assigned, whether an exClusive liCenCe was granted to SSGA (and if so what the terms of that liCenCe may have been). If Visbal retained Copyright ownership of the Fearless Girl then, as the Copyright owner, she is free to reproduce the sculpture as she wishes subject to the terms of the exclusive licence or any other contract with SSGA, if one exists. In the Australian proCeedings, SSGA is claiming that the agreement between SSGA and Visbal granted SSGA the exclusive right to use the sculpture (in 2D and 3D form) to promote gender 2 diversity in corporate governance and in the financial services sector and placed restrictions on Visbal’s ability to deal with the rights in the sCulpture in these fields – claims whiCh Visbal denies. The terms that SSGA and Visbal aCtually agreed upon in relation to the rights to the image of the Fearless Girl will have a major impaCt on the Australian proceeding between SSGA and Maurice BlaCkburn. If SSGA’s Claims are found to be true, then MauriCe BlaCkburn’s position is signifiCantly weakened. However, if Visbal never assigned Copyright or granted an exClusive liCenCe to SSGA as they claim then SSGA may be attempting to enforCe rights they do not hold. Indeed, if agreement between Maurice Blackburn and Visbal may provide some remedies for Maurice Blackburn against Visbal, if the rights Visbal provided to MauriCe BlaCkburn were invalid or breaChed the rights of any third party suCh as SSGA. Trade Mark Ownership and Passing Off The owner of a registered trade mark has the exClusive right to use the mark in relation to partiCular goods and services. They can also prevent other traders from using a substantially identical or deceptively similar mark in relation to identical or similar goods or services. In Australia, SSGA is the owner of the registered word trade mark “FEARLESS GIRL” in respeCt of publicity services relating to bringing awareness of gender and diversity issues and finanCial advisory serviCes. SSGA also owns a pending trade mark application which is broader and covers more areas. In short, in order for Maurice Blackburn to infringe on SSGA’s trade marks, they must 1) use the “FEARLESS GIRL” expression or something deceptively similar as a trade mark and 2) use it in relation to similar goods and services that the trade mark is registered for. It is possible that they have done so through their promotional aCtivities prior to the unveiling of the statue in Melbourne, however this will be tested in Court. In addition to trade mark infringement, the investment firm is also arguing that MauriCe BlaCkburn has committed to common law tort of passing off and have made false representations under the Australian Consumer Law. In other words, MauriCe BlaCkburn is taking a free ride on SSGA’s goodwill and reputation and representing that there is a commercial arrangement between MauriCe BlaCkburn and SSGA when there is in faCt not, and that as a result SSGA has suffered damages. SSGA is Claiming that it has developed a substantial reputation and goodwill in the Fearless Girl image and name in relation to gender diversity worldwide inCluding Australia through its Australian counterpart and Maurice Blackburn’s conduct misrepresents that there is an affiliation between SSGA and MauriCe BlaCkburn’s sCulptures. Although SSGA must also prove that there has been or is likely to be damage as a result of Maurice Blackburn’s commissioned statue in Australia, this has yet to be satisfied or properly explored. It is important to note that prior to the unveiling of the Melbourne installation, SSGA was suCCessful in filing an injunCtion against Maurice BlaCkburn on the basis of trade mark infringement and the likelihood that the public will be misled into thinking that Maurice BlaCkburn was affiliated with the original sculpture commissioned by SSGA. The injunction was ultimately lifted on the Condition that MauriCe BlaCkburn inCluded a disClaimer on the statue and in the newspaper that the Melbourne repliCa was a “limited edition reproduCtion” of the original and that there is no affiliation between MauriCe BlaCkburn and SSGA. MauriCe BlaCkburn was also required to halt all promotional aCtivities involving the replica and Fearless Girl name. Despite MauriCe BlaCkburn agreeing to the Conditions set by SSGA in order to proCeed with the planned unveiling, the Australian law firm continues to defend their position and denies any wrongdoing in Commissioning the Melbourne installation. Both proCeedings against Visbal and MauriCe BlaCkburn remain ongoing and it will be interesting to see how the intertwining issues of copyright ownership, trade mark infringement, passing off and breach of consumer laws play out in the US and Australian courts. Contact us If you would like further information on copyright and trade mark infringement, passing off or the Australian Consumer Law and how it impacts on you or your business, please contact one of our experts below. 3 Winnie Lok Clint Fillipou +61 3 9907 4310 +61 3 9907 4302 [email protected] [email protected] www.anisimoff.com.au https://twitter.com/AnisimoffLegal https://www.facebook.com/AnisimoffLegal http://www.linkedin.com/company/anisimoff-legal .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fearless Girl
    Fearless Girl Dominica Ribeiro State Street Global Advisors Head of Institutional Marketing, North America 2414907.1.1.AM.RTL Photo: Sculpture by Kristen Visbal $2.51 Trillion AUM reflects approximately $32.45 billion (as of December 31, 2018), with respect to which State Street Global Advisors Funds Distributors, LLC (SSGA FD) serves as marketing agent; SSGA FD and State Street Global Advisors are affiliated. 2414907.1.1.AM.RTL Our Mission Invest responsibly to enable economic prosperity and social progress 2414907.1.1.AM.RTL Studies show companies with women in leadership perform better than those without. Source: State Street Global Advisors, Source: MSCI Women on Boards: Global Trends in Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards, November 2015. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. 2414907.1.1.AM.RTL 1 in 4 Russell 3000 companies did not have a woman on their board in 2017 Source: State Street Global Advisors Asset Stewardship Team March 2017 2414907.1.1.AM.RTL Objectives Promote the power of women in leadership Create global awareness for our asset stewardship agenda Enable further discussions with clients about our wider ESG offerings Be first call for every institutional investor and intermediary on Photo: Sculpture by Kristen Visbal gender diversity investing 2414907.1.1.AM.RTL 5 2414907.1.1.AM.RTL Key Ingredients Relevancy Conviction Linkage to investment capabilities Underpinning investment philosophy and policies Photo: Sculpture by Kristen Visbal 2134063.1.1.GBL.RTL7 7 News Coverage Beyond Talk University of Delaware
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Statue - Why Board Diversity Is Important 15/05/2017   
    Careers Contact Us Global Our firm Insights Capabilities Press centre SEARCH Beyond the statue - Why board diversity is important 15/05/2017 Summary On March 7 in celebration of International Women’s Day, the 7,000 pound charging bull sculpture, which has reigned alone for 27 years in Lower Manhattan as a potent symbol of Wall Street, woke up to some company. Investment firm State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) had placed the statue of a young girl standing in defiance opposite the bull. “Fearless Girl” was placed to introduce and promote its campaign for increasing the number and role of women in corporate leadership positions. Beyond the statue - Why board diversity is important On March 7 in celebration of International Women’s Day, the 7,000 pound charging bull sculpture, which has reigned alone for 27 years in Lower Manhattan as a potent symbol of Wall Street, woke up to some company. Investment firm State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) had placed the statue of a young girl standing in defiance opposite the bull. “Fearless Girl” was placed to introduce and promote its campaign for increasing the number and role of women in corporate leadership positions. This is particularly notable for State Street as the majority of its assets are passive, and large passive managers such as SSGA, Blackrock, and Vanguard have historically been oft-criticised for not taking a more active approach with the enormous amount of shares they own. Intuitively this makes sense as an active manager may sell out of their position if they do not agree with the decisions being made by Corporate Boards and senior management.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Corporate Responsibility Report
    2017 Corporate Responsibility Report State Street Corporation State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 www.statestreet.com The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without State Street Corporation's express written consent. All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. © 2015 State Street Corporation CORP-1394 Exp. April 30, 2016 Creating Long-Term Value As a financial institution with a global footprint and diverse clients, our business imperative is to create long-term value for our stakeholders. That’s something we focus on every day in every business interaction — through strategic governance, careful risk management, responsible growth and innovation. Our impact also extends beyond the business of investing. By committing to social and environmental stewardship, human rights and responsible conduct, we hope to strengthen our communities and serve the greater good. These efforts are reflected in our corporate responsibility (CR) initiatives across the company. CR is our commitment to all stakeholders. It means we strive to conduct business in an ethical manner; work in partnership with our clients, employees and suppliers; support the communities where we work and live; and protect the environment. Our values —Trust Is Our Greatest Asset, Always Finding Better Ways, Stronger Together and Global Force, Local Citizen — also support this commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSBA Summer 2017 | Vol
    NYSBA SUMMER 2017 | VOL. 26 | NO. 2 Bright Ideas A publication of the Intellectual Property Law Section of the New York State Bar Association Inside Supreme Court Tackles IP Issues: ■ Star Athletica: Finding for Fashion ■ The Return of the Submarine Patent ■ Protecting Registration of Disparaging Trademarks Also: ■ VARA: “Charging Bull” v. “Fearless Girl” NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Section From the NYSBA Book Store > Members get 20% discount* with coupon code Counseling Content PUB8700N Providers in the Digital Age A Handbook for Lawyers For as long as there have been printing presses, there have been accusations of libel, invasion of privacy, intellectual property infringements and a variety of other torts. Now that much of the content reaching the public is distributed over the Internet, television (including cable and satellite), radio and film as well as in print, the field of pre-publication review has become more complicated and more important. Counseling Content Providers in the Digital Age provides an overview of the issues content reviewers face repeatedly. Counseling Content Providers in the Digital Age was written and edited by experienced media law attorneys from California and New York. This book is invaluable to anyone entering the field of pre-publication review as well as anyone responsible for vetting the content of their client’s or their firm’s Web site. EDITORS Kathleen Conkey, Esq. Elissa D. Hecker, Esq. Table of Contents Pamela C. Jones, Esq. Introduction; Defamation; The Invasion of Privacy Torts; Right of Publicity; Other News-gathering Torts; Copyright Infringement; Trademark Infringement; Rights and Clearances; Errors and Omissions PRODUCT INFO AND PRICES Insurance; Contracting with Minors; Television Standards and 2010 / 480 pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Arby's, a Charging Bull and a Fearless Girl
    ARBY’S, A CHARGING BULL AND A FEARLESS GIRL | Page 1 ARBY’S, A CHARGING BULL AND A FEARLESS GIRL By: Jack Greiner on April 13, 2017 on graydon.law Have you heard the Arby’s ad that features Bonnie Tyler’s “Holding Out for a Hero”? The joke is that every time the song says “hero” Ving Rhames (Arby’s deep voiced spokesman) says “gyro” over the soundtrack. It’s kind of funny. And I don’t know what deal Arby’s struck with Bonnie Tyler, but I assume they worked something out. You can’t distort an artist’s work without their permission. That seems like a fairly basic concept. Which brings us to this story. It seems that Arturo Di Modica, the artist who sculpted the “Charging Bull” statue that adorns Wall Street, and he is upset with the placement of another statue – “Fearless Girl” in such a way that it appears the bull is bearing down on her. “Fearless Girl” was commissioned by State Street Global Advisors. According to Di Modica, State Street commissioned “Fearless Girl” to promote its Gender Diversity Index SHE. Indeed at “Fearless Girl’s” feet the following words appear: “Know the power of Leadership, SHE makes a difference.” And let’s be honest, the girl looks a lot more fearless staring down a bull than she would standing by herself. Coincidence or rip-off? In any event, it surely seems to distort Di Modica’s work. It’s hard for me to see how it’s much different from the Arby’s ad.
    [Show full text]
  • A Battle Between Moral Rights and Freedom of Expression: How Would Moral Rights Empower the "Charging Bull" Against the "Fearless Girl"?
    THE JOHN MARSHALL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW A BATTLE BETWEEN MORAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: HOW WOULD MORAL RIGHTS EMPOWER THE "CHARGING BULL" AGAINST THE "FEARLESS GIRL"? TZU-I LEE ABSTRACT The Fearless Girl statue that stands in front of the iconic Charging Bull sculpture in Manhattan’s Financial District has drawn attention since an investment company first installed her for International Women’s Day in 2017. The Fearless Girl alters the context and meaning of the Charging Bull to a symbol of gender oppression in the workplace and provokes tensions between copyright and freedom of speech. The Fearless Girl also leads to a scene where a small girl funded by Wall Street is standing up a large bull created by an artist with his own money. This comment discusses how artists can rely on “moral rights” in preventing their works from intentional distortions like the Fearless Girl case under the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA). With the reputational externalities and the freedom of expression theories, this comment proposes that VARA should extend to protect against objectionable contextual modification of a work of art. The clear global trend is towards greater recognition of artist’s moral rights for a broad range of protection. The protection against objectionable contextual modification also reveals unequal power relations and empowers artists in the complexities of cultural production and consumption under globalization. The contextual protection is valuable for the artist and the public interest. Copyright © 2018 The John Marshall Law School Cite as Tzu-I Lee, A Battle Between Moral Rights and Freedom of Expression: How Would Moral Rights Empower the "Charging Bull" Against the "Fearless Girl"?, 17 J.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Proxy Statement
    Ronald P. O’Hanley Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer April 6, 2021 Dear Shareholder: We cordially invite you to the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders of State Street Corporation. The meeting will be held on May 19, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Due to the continuing COVID-19 public health crisis, out of caution for the health and safety of our shareholders, employees and directors, the annual meeting of shareholders will be conducted online via live audio webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/STT2021. You will be able to participate, submit questions and vote your shares electronically. The proxy statement and annual meeting provide an important opportunity for us to communicate with you as shareholders, and for you to communicate with us, on important topics such as our performance, corporate governance, the effectiveness of the Board of Directors and executive compensation. Details regarding virtual admission to the meeting and the business to be conducted are more fully described in the accompanying notice of annual meeting and proxy statement. Your vote is very important to us. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting online, please carefully review the enclosed proxy statement together with the annual report that accompanies it and then cast your vote. We urge you to vote regardless of the number of shares you hold. To be sure that your vote will be received in time, please cast your vote by your choice of available means at your earliest convenience. We look forward to the annual meeting. Your continued interest in State Street is very much appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood and France, 1914-1945 Louise G
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2011 Vive la Différence: Hollywood and France, 1914-1945 Louise G. Hilton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Hilton, Louise G., "Vive la Différence: Hollywood and France, 1914-1945" (2011). LSU Master's Theses. 1206. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1206 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VIVE LA DIFFÉRENCE: HOLLYWOOD AND FRANCE, 1914-1945 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Arts in The Interdepartmental Program in Liberal Arts by Louise G. Hilton B. A., Louisiana State University, 2004 May 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish, first of all, to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Charles Shindo, for his counsel and infinite patience during the time I spent working on this project. Dr. Karl Roider also deserves heartfelt thanks for his unflagging support throughout my studies at LSU and for his agreeing to be a member of my thesis committee. I extend my appreciation to Dr. William Clark for giving of his valuable time to be a part of my committee.
    [Show full text]
  • 2,500 Sf Corner Available up to 7,500 Sf Available
    CORNER OF BROAD & EXCHANGE PLACE 2,500 SF CORNER AVAILABLE UP TO 7,500 SF AVAILABLE RETAIL 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL 3 GROUND FLOOR BROAD STREET 2,500 SF 1,516 SF 620 SF 75’ 50’ on 12’ on 46’ FOOTAGE Wraparound Exchange Place Exchange Place POSESSION Q2 2020 Arranged Immediate RETAIL 1 CEILING HEIGHTS 14’ 12’-15’ 13’ 29’ 2,500 SF *Additional 2,500 SF can be made available RENT UPON REQUEST COMMENTS • ADJACENT TO WHOLE FOODS AND LIFETIME FITNESS RETAIL 2 • SPACES CAN BE COMBINED • BASE OF NEWLY RENOVATED 476,000 SF CLASS A OFFICE TOWER 1,516 SF • STEPS FROM NYSE, FEDERAL HALL, FEARLESS GIRL 50’ • STEPS FROM 4,5,J,Z SUBWAY • POSSIBLE ENTRANCES INTO BUILDING • NYSC IN BUILDING EXCHANGE PLACE RETAIL 3 12’ 620 SF NEW STREET TRINITY PLACE CEDAR STREET PINE STREET PEARL STREET FEDERAL HALL NATIONAL MEMORIAL 1 WALL STREET WALL STREET 23 WALL STREET HANOVER COMING SOON (PROPOSED) BROADWAY ST JAKE HOROWITZ FEARLESS GIRL WALL STREET 20 STATUE Real Estate Salesperson COMING SOON BLACK LABEL CUCINA +1 212 716 3798 SALON BENE 25 PIZZERIA [email protected] NEW EXCHANGE PLACE STREET THE ROSETTA EXCHANGE IRISH WINES CLEANERS / PUNT DAVID TRICARICO FLOWERS Associate Real Estate Broker 25 30Broad Street +1 212 716 3585 EDGAR ST GOUVERNEUR LANE B [email protected] R BEAVER STREET FLAVORS 40 O A D S 41 T R E E WATER STREET T WILLIAM ST 50 45 DEVELOPMENT GFG BAKERY CAFE 60 55 MILL LN OLD SLIP MORRIS ST No representation is made as to the accuracy of the information furnished herein and same is submitted subject to errors, omissions, change of prices, rental, or other conditions, prior sale, lease, sublease, and/or withdrawal without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing and Preventing Sexist Advertising an Analysis of Local And
    — Addressing and preventing sexist advertising An analysis of local and global promising practice Abstract This research paper explores the efficacy of interventions that aim to address sexism or promote progressive gender representations in advertising, highlighting examples of local and global promising practice. Interventions to prevent or address sexist advertising may occur through several distinct mechanisms: legislative frameworks; self-regulatory and co-regulatory systems; the provision of educational resources to the broader community; industry initiatives to re-shape advertising culture and promote diverse, inclusive and ethical practice; and the exertion of influence on advertisers and regulators through consumer activism. The paper explores the strengths and limitations of each mechanism and illustrates interventions in practice through a variety of case studies. Critical to addressing sexist advertising is a whole of system approach with mutually reinforcing interventions that capitalise on different opportunities for influence. Concluding summations are offered throughout with a range of recommendations drawn from these at the end of the paper. Authors and researchers This research paper has been written and researched by: Dr Lauren Gurrieri, Senior Lecturer in Marketing, RMIT University Dr Rob Hoffman, Research Assistant, RMIT University This research is funded by Women’s Health Victoria as part of the Advertising (in)equality project and supported by the Victorian Government through its Free from Violence Innovation Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Manhattan Map Front U
    C¢« C¢TTC¢« C¢TT C¢¯B E GN¦H SE C¢¯B E C¢¯B E Map Key W R P B£D¦§ W ETT B£D¦§ N H D ±E«N H D ±E« W W W W W ¤ OAª ¤ OAª ¤ OAª ¤ OAª ¤ OAª Visitor Information New York Water Taxi Free Downtown Connection Bus W ¤ OAª B S u bway NYC Ferry Seaport District Bound Stops K MSSE R R RE D P L R Citibike Station BPC Bound Stops M AªTT FK T R P L R C¢« C¢TTC¢« C¢TTC¢« C¢TT Path Station W ¬I® O GN¦H R P £C SCTT P M AªTT D R R Titanic Park G E Points of Attraction Museums BL BL SE BMSE Vietnam Veterans Memorial Plaza R R RE R R RE P­ P 9/11 Museum & Memorial 9/11 Tribute Museum N A SE Zuccotti Park T¢£TAY V Y R ASE P L R African Burial Ground Fraunces Tavern Museum W R E TIPE FT R Battery Maritime Building/ Museum of American Finance W E DSE F OTT Hotels F Governors Island Ferry OTT BM R (Temporarily Closed) G E Charging Bull Statue WI TT Museum of Jewish Heritage - AC Hotel J E F¶D±E Brooklyn Bridge A Living Memorial to the Holocaust D H Aka Wall Street J E CF R Brookfield Place Poets House C LT N AT. Aloft Manhattan Downtown MEA J SE B£D¦§ B£D¦§ P T R Castle Clinton National Monument Skyscraper Museum P L R Andaz Wall Street S« H D ±E« WIS.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FUTURE? Apple Has Siri
    CRAINSNEW YORK BUSINESS 10,000 businesses to get emergency lifeline P. 5 | Classical music’s rock stars P. 6 | Put your money where your mind is P. 15 NEW YORK BUSINESS® APRIL 17 - 23, 2017 | PRICE $3.00 IS THIS THE STORE OF THE FUTURE? Apple has Siri. Amazon has Alexa. Tom Murn has Vicki, which he is hoping will transform the way New Yorkers shop PAGE 13 VOL. XXXIII, NO. 16 WWW.CRAINSNEWYORK.COM NEWSPAPER P001_CN_20170417.indd 1 4/14/17 7:36 PM APRIL 17 - 23, 2017 CRAINSNEW YORK BUSINESS FROM THE NEWSROOM | BRENDAN O’CONNOR | MANAGING EDITOR IN THIS ISSUE Playing it safe 4 IN CASE YOU MISSED IT 5 TECHNOLOGY BROOKLYN’S LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL season is off to a 6 SMALL BIZ SPOTLIGHT Midtown typically slow and soggy start this year. Opening Day (April East is finally 1) was a washout, and in an apparent pre-emptive strike 7 ENTERTAINMENT becoming a 8 WHO OWNS THE BLOCK restaurant against further field erosion, the Parks Department decided destination to close all the diamonds in Prospect Park for the entire 9 REAL ESTATE weekend. The sun returned the following Saturday, which 10 VIEWPOINTS also happened to be the beginning of the public school 11 THE LIST spring break, leaving several teams—including my son’s, which I coach—depleted of players. FEATURES But, hey, that’s baseball. To borrow a line from Bull 13 VENDING MACHINE Durham, sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, some- Though rare, sudden 15 PEACE OFFERING times it rains. And in the case of the Prospect Park Baseball cardiac deaths Association, sometimes half the team is on vacation.
    [Show full text]