Presence and Metabolism of Endogenous Androgenic–Anabolic Steroid Hormones in Meat-Producing Animals: a Review J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Food Additives and Contaminants Vol. 26, No. 5, May 2009, 640–671 Presence and metabolism of endogenous androgenic–anabolic steroid hormones in meat-producing animals: a review J. Scartha*, C. Akreb, L. van Ginkelc, B. Le Bizecd, H. De Brabandere, W. Korthf, J. Pointsg, P. Tealea and J. Kayh aHFL Sport Science (a Quotient Bioresearch Company), Fordham, UK; bCanadian Food Inspection Agency, Saskatoon, Canada; cNational Institute of Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, European Union Community Reference Laboratory for Residues, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; dLABERCA, Ecole Nationale Ve´te´rinaire de Nantes, Nantes, France; eFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Laboratory of Chemical Analysis, Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium; fNational Residue Survey, Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Barton, ACT, Australia; gVeterinary Drugs Group, LGC, Teddington, UK; hVeterinary Medicines Directorate, Addlestone, UK (Received 17 April 2008; final version received 15 November 2008) The presence and metabolism of endogenous steroid hormones in meat-producing animals has been the subject of much research over the past 40 years. While significant data are available, no comprehensive review has yet been performed. Species considered in this review are bovine, porcine, ovine, equine, caprine and cervine, while steroid hormones include the androgenic–anabolic steroids testosterone, nandrolone and boldenone, as well as their precursors and metabolites. Information on endogenous steroid hormone concentrations is primarily useful in two ways: (1) in relation to pathological versus ‘normal’ physiology and (2) in relation to the detection of the illegal abuse of these hormones in residue surveillance programmes. Since the major focus of this review is on the detection of steroids abuse in animal production, the information gathered to date is used to guide future research. A major deficiency in much of the existing published literature is the lack of standardization and formal validation of experimental approach. Key articles are cited that highlight the huge variation in reported steroid concentrations that can result when samples are analysed by different laboratories under different conditions. These deficiencies are in most cases so fundamental that it is difficult to make reliable comparisons between data sets and hence it is currently impossible to recommend definitive detection strategies. Standardization of the experimental approach would need to involve common experimental protocols and collaboratively validated analytical methods. In particular, standardization would need to cover everything from the demographic of the animal population studied, the method of sample collection and storage (especially the need to sample live versus slaughter sampling since the two methods of surveillance have very different requirements, particularly temporally), sample preparation technique (including mode of extraction, hydrolysis and derivatization), the end-point analytical detection technique, validation protocols, and the statistical methods applied to the resulting data. Although efforts are already underway (at HFL and LABERCA) to produce more definitive data and promote communication among the scientific community on this issue, the convening of a formal European Downloaded By: [Universiteit Gent] At: 07:40 2 June 2009 Union working party is recommended. Keywords: steroids; food; metabolism; endogenous; natural; meat; bovine; porcine; ovine Introduction officially registered for use as hormonal growth- The European Union Council Directive 96/22/EC promoting compounds. Due to their anabolic and/or (European Union 1996a) states that ‘substances partitioning effect, they increase the profit per unit having a hormonal action’ are prohibited for use in head for the farmer. European Union Council animals intended for meat production. As well as Directive 96/23/EC (European Union 1996b) purely novel steroids not existing in nature, the (European Union 2002) lays down the requirements Directive therefore also covers synthetically produced for residue testing in order to ensure compliance with versions of steroids that are known to occur naturally the European Union prohibition. For a succinct in certain species under particular circumstances. overview of the context of the different European However, in some countries, including the USA, Union directives and the resulting methods that Canada and Australia, some (combinations of) ste- have been applied in recent years, see Stolker and roids and a related synthetic compound zeranol are Brinkman (2005). *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ISSN 0265–203X print/ISSN 1464–5122 online ß 2009 Taylor & Francis DOI: 10.1080/02652030802627160 http://www.informaworld.com Food Additives and Contaminants 641 The steroid hormones considered in this review reaches the test matrix, i.e. plasma or urine. Some are the androgenic–anabolic steroids that potentially type of quantitative uni- or multivariate threshold derive from precursors within the body such as approach is therefore usually required in order to cholesterol and pregnenolone (Figure 1). These include confirm abuse. Where particular steroids are believed testosterone, androstenedione, nandrolone, boldenone not to be endogenous in an animal at a particular limit and DHEA, as well as their numerous catabolic of detection (LOD), who is to say that as analytical products and any precursor compounds that might limits decrease, they will not be discovered as endo- potentially lead to conversion to these steroids within genous at a lower concentration? These and some the body. The task of detecting the abuse of further analytical and physiological considerations are synthetically produced hormones that are also known taken up again later in this review. to be endogenous under certain conditions, dubbed Analytical methods of various kinds have in the past ‘pseudo-endogenous’ or ‘grey zone substances’ due to been employed to identify and quantify endogenous their dual synthetic/endogenous nature (Van Thuyne steroids, their metabolites and precursors, but their 2006), is problematic for many reasons. The most effectiveness and the harmonization of their application significant challenge arises because when they are in different countries and situations is questionable. shown to occur naturally within a particular type of For example, Van Ginkel et al. (1993) highlight the animal, a simple qualitative demonstration of their wide range of different analytical methods and thresh- presence does not necessarily prove abuse. Most, but olds that have been applied in different European not all, steroid preparations are ester versions of these Union countries in the past. Since the authors are aware potentially endogenous steroids. However, a simple of no comprehensive published review on the concen- demonstration of the presence of the steroid ester as trations and metabolism of such steroids in food- proof of abuse is not always possible (with the producing animals, the overall aim of the work exception of hair and injection/implant sites in some reported herein was therefore to carry out a survey of cases) due to the ester being cleaved by the time it the existing literature, which will then guide further Downloaded By: [Universiteit Gent] At: 07:40 2 June 2009 Figure 1. Schematic of the biosynthetic pathways for endogenous steroids in mammalian species. Many of the reactions that involve oxidation or reduction of hydroxyl and ketone groups, respectively, are reversible. Wavy arrows indicate a putative pathway only. 642 J. Scarth et al. practical work in order to increase knowledge or to (Henricks 1976; Velle 1976; Hartmann et al. 1998; develop more effective testing methods. Fritsche and Steinhart 1999; Arnold 2000; Daxenberger et al. 2001; Stephany et al. 2004; Mouw et al. 2006). Literature survey methods The overall aim was to collect as much published and unpublished data as possible in order to provide Physiological and analytical considerations regarding for the most comprehensive evaluation of the field. comparisons of steroid concentrations within and Literature searches were conducted using the Pubmed between different species facility of the US National Centre for Biotechnology A basic understanding of the analytical and physiolo- Information (NCBI) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), gical context of natural steroids is assumed in this Scopus (http://www.scopus.com), the Web of Science review. Nevertheless, some information of specific (http://www.scientific.thomson.com/products/wos/) relevance is given below and the biosynthetic and and various ‘grey’ literature sources (referring to lite- catabolic pathways of some representative natural rature sources not easily found using common search steroids are summarized in Figures 1 and 2 and facilities), such as government websites, reports and Table 4. Further background information on general libraries. Many researchers internationally were also analytical aspects can be found in Makin et al. (1995) contacted so that as much data as possible from indi- and Stolker and Brinkman (2005) while further vidual animals and particularly for values below the physiological information can be found in Mason reported LODs, detection capability (CC ) or decision (2002) and Hadley and Levine (2006). limit (CC ) could be obtained. This had the advantage Although the background given here is separated that some appreciation of concentrations