Gaza Strip Zikim United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Occupied Palestinian Territory Karmiya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gaza Strip Zikim United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Occupied Palestinian Territory Karmiya DISPLACED WOMEN’SRIGHTS TO HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY REALITIES FROM THE GROUND: Women’s Housing, Land and Property Rights in the Gaza Strip Zikim United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs occupied Palestinian territory Karmiya e s n e o il GAZA STRIP Z m g l n i a Yad Mordekhai Scan it! Navigate! h ic A CCESS A N D CLO SUR E with QR reader App with Avenza PDF Maps s t App i u F a 4 34 As-Siafa n d o e DECEMBER 2012 e N 5 h . s a 1 R r A EREZ CROSSING (BEIT HANOUN) Open six days (daytime) a week for the movement of internationalNetiv workersha-Asara and limited number of authorized Palestinians including medical, humanitarian cases and aid workers. Al Attarta Temporary Wastewater Treatment Lagoons Ghaboon Hai Al Amal Fado's 4 Al Qaraya al Badawiya a (Umm An-Naser) n ee North Gaza Beit Lahia D Ed F Al Salateen Al Jam'ia Hatabiyya Wastewater h Al Kur'a Treatment Plant la D El Khamsa Sa As Sultan I e Abedl Hamaid d Beit Lahiya e y e Aslan Al-Sekka h Al Mathaf s a b ) a a k Abu Rahma R Hotel j k o 'Izbat Beit Hanoun r l Alkhazan B e 2 a -S A e l Arc-Med E F - i A Al Balad d l- l t Al Share' El Am 34 1 Hotel B L a A a e h h Sheikh Zayed Hai Al Amal 0 S Madinat al 'Awda a Al Mashroo ia r Housing Project Beit Hanoun c M a Beit Hanoun 2 Jabalia Camp i Al-Zatoon r t n Industrial S S r i t Zone e o r w . ze ta a Beit Hanoun f af -W Al Masreen e S Al l- Kamal Edwan lil n A ha Hospital b Ash Shati' Camp Hospital K E 'Arab Maslakh Zemmo Abu Ghazala A Jabalia Beit Lahya m An Naser l-qu t Ash Sheikh ds Al Banat Sderot i Gaza a e Radwan Al-Sekk v Wharf Jabalya El Balad Al Farata een m d D Al Nazaz i o h E UNDP Compound la n Al Deira S Sa L a N Hotel Northern Remal le - h a t D m g Palestine a a r r Al Shifa' Stadium d a n o Al K n -q - n ud l F Hospital a s i E e UNSCO Compound h a D Southern Remal s m I Ad Darraj i e Al Azhar UNRWA y University Compound l a At Tuffah F n e a Q ka b Islamic l- k r A e University Ja S s 2 m l- a A g As Sabra l A e d 1 bd Northern Gaza e e l N l e Golden Star Hotel as Gaza City Wastewater i A 0 er (Movenpick) Treatment Plant c 2 Al 'Umari m e r Ash Sheikh 'Ijleen Mosque r r Tal El Hawa d Old City l i o e f e e s Mefalsim f h d Gaza Harbor a s u Ijdeedeh a e n a l-Q n b R A m c r a r i s E A a K t - a m l u it e Ash Shuja'iyeh A a e v Gaza n (C a im o R al Mintar d N Hill 6 L N o . 1 0 n o Az Zaitoun e g e ka Nahal Oz / Fuel Pipeline 232 t D ek r Gaza Wastewater d n S E l- i Treatment Plant h A Closed since January 2010 Kfar Aza 9 la A a l- h S M 0 o n t s a i 0 r r F 2 Karni Crossing (Al Montar) d a o Karni s y R Closed since June 2007 r l Industrial ta At Turukman e s Zone l a a (conveyor belt closed since March 2011) o i C Al Zahra e u Al Mughraqa Sa'ad (Abu Middein) m n arim Nitz l ni - a Kar a J Nitzarim t c Wadi Gaza (Al-Shohada) i Junction t m a kk u b e o a -S tt l r a A a h Gaza Landfill i K F l- Juhor ad Dik n A n e Gaza B r 3 a m Power Alumim O A Plant Shuva bu B W Tkuma a d k a e An Nuseirat r d A Zimrat l i 25 Camp -S G e dd a e z e eq a MEDITERRANEAN SEA a k k e Al Bureij Camp S n l- Kfar Maimon e A e D d Tushiya E M h Az Zawayda la a S Deir al Balah Wharf Wastewater Treatment Plant Be'eri Al Maghazi Camp Shuhada' Al Aqsa Shokeda Netivot Deir al Balah Camp Hospital Deir al Balah Al Musaddar d a A o l-S R k h l f o o la o h ta a l a s h k d 232 a a K - a o h l C la E a S m e I S R A E L e r a K l e d b A Middle Area Al-Shohada eim d Kisuf Wadi as Salqa a o R GAZA STRIP KEY FACTS l ta s a Re'im o n C e e D d E K h is a u l f a e S i Gaza Goch Qateef m Mawasi Khan Yunis i n Wharf a 569,715 m 2 th O Total Area 365 km l- E North Gaza n a Kisufim lt o s s A 322,126 Khan Yunis r Wastewater e s Al Qarara a Treatment Plant N l e d b A l As Sureij a m a J Housing Project a k k e S l- A A Middle Area * hm Total Population a 1,644,293 f d e Y 238,807 te a a se Ein ha-Shlosha Q en Al Mawasi (Khan Yunis) h c Al Aqsa University Khan Yunis o Mawasi Rafah G (Khan Yunis Campus) Camp Wharf European Naser 'Abasan al Jadida Khan Yunis UNDP Rubble Hospital (as Saghira) Crushing Site Hospital 310,868 d Khan Yunis a o R l Bani Suheila ta s e a n o o C n Z le e i e Nirim g i m q D in r Al Mathaf Hotel l d h a a h E s c S i h ti l- F a u A l Patish o a h a Al Karama N n fa S Arc-Med Hotel E Rafah l- a B WXY a 1 R h a s GAZA CITY r Al Mawasi (Rafah) i Qizan an Najjar n 'Abasan al Kabira 202,777 P! u Madinat al 'Awda Y n a a r Al Qarya as Suwaydiya h o h K k (Swedish Village) a F - i l w A ta af ja Khan Yunis l-S lo A a F l- r e A s a N O S l- a m la Housing Project A a h Qa' al Kharaba r K B h A (Unfinished) e a n la b A f Qa' al Qurein Ash Shati' Camp l- u f K e al Naser Hospital h Jabalya te P! a B a qÆ ta Q b Rafah a k h E a c l-B i e o Nir Oz a h Wastewater Tal as Sultan na e r G s s A E Treatment Plant Ash Sheikh a Khuza'a y l a - Gaza n e S oo Radwan WXY d R l - e Wharf a l M h E d K am P o !x n s K An Naser e Ib a h h r lq a i e a A l l il a q g Ad-Dira Hotel in E d l- d a A z W e l E a Al- k - ze qu l k N Umm Kameil e ds p r h e a s Magen i -S C l e A r o Palestine a r la r Stadium a J i Al Fukhkhari l- A dor d WATER CONSUMPTION oo as M A Ma'on Plants A Northern Rimal l Qatar Chariety p -W e b h a Umm al Kilab * d p t l a t a a jd r h WXY a -M o -K 80-90 l Southern Remal l A Ad Daraj a A 232 kk x s e n d Al Azhar University l-S e litres/capita/day (l/c/d) is the u A Q ¥¢B i E G Y P T B l- r A m a At Tuffah in Rafah Camp m average water consumption ¥¢B D a a O Rafah Islamic University l af d a Y E B n h t T ei a a ru Q l a t - a e h l S Einin ha -theBsor Gaza Strip, below the A a s J H d am u A a u Q l- l A T s l- Q b a d Khalil Al-Wazeer s Golden Star A he e i WHO standard of 100 l/c/d. r l N u e a a n (Movennbeck) sa s q a er A Salah Ed Deen n l- e A As Sabra Gate S n Ash Sheikh e 'Ijleen n a Rafah l Rafah Sufa Landfill UNEMPLOYMENT RATE e n s D o n o a m r a y Old City Ijdeedeh (Egypt) b a Tal El Hawa l r l a A E A Al-Oroob r l m - e O r M t * s a d i e u s Q l- d Rd r No a A .
Recommended publications
  • Pdf | 459.71 Kb
    מרכז המידע הישראלי לזכויות האדם בשטחים (ע.ר.) One Big Prison Freedom of Movement to and from the Gaza Strip on the Eve of the Disengagement Plan March 2005 Researched and written by Yehezkel Lein Data coordination by Najib Abu Rokaya, Ariana Baruch, Rim ‘Odeh, Shlomi Swissa Fieldwork by Musa Abu Hashhash, Iyad Haddad, Zaki Kahil, Karim Jubran, Mazen al-Majdalawi, ‘Abd al-Karim S’adi Assistance on legal issues by Yossi Wolfson Translated by Zvi Shulman, Shaul Vardi Edited by Rachel Greenspahn Introduction “The only thing missing in Gaza is a morning line-up,” said Abu Majid, who spent ten years in Israeli prisons, to Israeli journalist Amira Hass in 1996.1 This sarcastic comment expressed the frustration of Gaza residents that results from Israel’s rigid policy of closure on the Gaza Strip following the signing of the Oslo Agreements. The gap between the metaphor of the Gaza Strip as a prison and the reality in which Gazans live has rapidly shrunk since the outbreak of the intifada in September 2000 and the imposition of even harsher restrictions on movement. The shrinking of this gap is the subject of this report. Israel’s current policy on access into and out of the Gaza Strip developed gradually during the 1990s. The main component is the “general closure” that was imposed in 1993 on the Occupied Territories and has remained in effect ever since. Every Palestinian wanting to enter Israel, including those wanting to travel between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, needs an individual permit. In 1995, about the time of the Israeli military’s redeployment in the Gaza Strip pursuant to the Oslo Agreements, Israel built a perimeter fence, encircling the Gaza Strip and separating it from Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes 22 – 28 February 2006
    U N I TOCHA E D Weekly N A Briefing T I O NotesN S 22 – 28 February 2006 N A T I O N S| 1 U N I E S OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes 22 – 28 February 2006 Of note this period • IDF military operations in Balata camp (Nablus) continued. Four Palestinians including a child were killed and 15 others injured. Two IDF soldiers were also injured in the operation. • A large number of Palestinians injured – including in demonstrations against the construction of the Barrier in Ramallah and Jerusalem and confrontations between the IDF and Palestinian stone throwers in the West Bank. • High number of flying checkpoints observed throughout the West Bank, particularly in Qalqiliya, Nablus and Hebron governorates. 1. Physical Protection Casualties1 80 60 40 20 0 Children Women Injuries Deaths Deaths Deaths Palestinians 71 8 1 - Israelis 10 - - - Internationals ---- • 22 February: IDF soldiers beat and injured a 21-year-old Palestinian in H1 area of Hebron city (Hebron). • 22 February: The IDF injured a 15-year-old Palestinian minor after opening fire towards Palestinian stone throwers in Bani Na’im (Hebron). • 22 February: Palestinians injured one Israeli after opening fire at an Israeli plated vehicle passing on Road 55 near Ázzun (Qalqiliya). • 22 February: The IDF injured one Palestinian man after opening fire at Huwwara checkpoint (Nablus) during unrest at the checkpoint caused by long delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza-Israel: the Legal and the Military View Transcript
    Gaza-Israel: The Legal and the Military View Transcript Date: Wednesday, 7 October 2015 - 6:00PM Location: Barnard's Inn Hall 07 October 2015 Gaza-Israel: The Legal and Military View Professor Sir Geoffrey Nice QC General Sir Nick Parker For long enough commentators have usually assumed the Israel - Palestine armed conflict might be lawful, even if individual incidents on both sides attracted condemnation. But is that assumption right? May the conflict lack legality altogether, on one side or both? Have there been war crimes committed by both sides as many suggest? The 2014 Israeli – Gaza conflict (that lasted some 52 days and that was called 'Operation Protective Edge' by the Israeli Defence Force) allows a way to explore some of the underlying issues of the overall conflict. General Sir Nick Parker explains how he advised Geoffrey Nice to approach the conflict's legality and reality from a military point of view. Geoffrey Nice explains what conclusions he then reached. Were war crimes committed by either side? Introduction No human is on this earth as a volunteer; we are all created by an act of force, sometimes of violence just as the universe itself arrived by force. We do not leave the world voluntarily but often by the force of disease. As pressed men on earth we operate according to rules of nature – gravity, energy etc. – and the rules we make for ourselves but focus much attention on what to do when our rules are broken, less on how to save ourselves from ever breaking them. That thought certainly will feature in later lectures on prison and sex in this last year of my lectures as Gresham Professor of Law but is also central to this and the next lecture both on Israel and on parts of its continuing conflict with Gaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev the Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research the Albert Katz International School for Desert Studies
    Ben-Gurion University of the Negev The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research The Albert Katz International School for Desert Studies Evolution of settlement typologies in rural Israel Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of "Master of Science" By: Keren Shalev November, 2016 “Human settlements are a product of their community. They are the most truthful expression of a community’s structure, its expectations, dreams and achievements. A settlement is but a symbol of the community and the essence of its creation. ”D. Bar Or” ~ III ~ תקציר למשבר הדיור בישראל השלכות מרחיקות לכת הן על המרחב העירוני והן על המרחב הכפרי אשר עובר תהליכי עיור מואצים בעשורים האחרונים. ישובים כפריים כגון קיבוצים ומושבים אשר התבססו בעבר בעיקר על חקלאות, מאבדים מאופיים הכפרי ומייחודם המקורי ומקבלים צביון עירוני יותר. נופי המרחב הכפרי הישראלי נעלמים ומפנים מקום לשכונות הרחבה פרבריות סמי- עירוניות, בעוד זהותה ודמותה הייחודית של ישראל הכפרית משתנה ללא היכר. תופעת העיור המואץ משפיעה לא רק על נופים כפריים, אלא במידה רבה גם על מרחבים עירוניים המפתחים שכונות פרבריות עם בתים צמודי קרקע על מנת להתחרות בכוח המשיכה של ישובים כפריים ולמשוך משפחות צעירות חזקות. כתוצאה מכך, סובלים המרחבים העירוניים, הסמי עירוניים והכפריים מאובדן המבנה והזהות המקוריים שלהם והשוני ביניהם הולך ומיטשטש. על אף שהנושא מעלה לא מעט סוגיות תכנוניות חשובות ונחקר רבות בעולם, מעט מאד מחקר נעשה בנושא בישראל. מחקר מקומי אשר בוחן את תהליכי העיור של המרחב הכפרי דרך ההיסטוריה והתרבות המקומית ולוקח בחשבון את התנאים המקומיים המשתנים, מאפשר התבוננות ואבחנה מדויקים יותר על ההשלכות מרחיקות הלכת. על מנת להתגבר על הבסיס המחקרי הדל בנושא, המחקר הנוכחי החל בבניית בסיס נתונים רחב של 84 ישובים כפריים (קיבוצים, מושבים וישובים קהילתיים( ומצייר תמונה כללית על תהליכי העיור של המרחב הכפרי ומאפייניה.
    [Show full text]
  • HAMAS DIVIDED: TIME for a NEW POLICY? by Tally Helfont
    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Email and Posted at www.fpri.org October 2010 HAMAS DIVIDED: TIME FOR A NEW POLICY? By Tally Helfont Tally Helfont is an FPRI research fellow. Her research focuses on Middle East-related issues and radical Islamic movements. She has also instructed training courses on behalf of K3 Enterprises in Civil Information Management to U.S. Military Civil Affairs Units and Human Terrain Teams assigned to Iraq and Afghanistan. September 2010 marked the beginning of renewed peace negotiations in the Middle East. The American-brokered talks took some time to restart—18-months to be exact—and its two primary participants, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, were reluctant at best. The parties met on three separate occasions: in Washington D.C. from September 1-2, in Sharm El-Sheikh from September 13-14, and at the Israeli Prime Minister's official residence in Jerusalem on September 15. It is difficult to say whether there was any tangible progress achieved during these meetings, but as it currently stands, the continuation of these efforts is uncertain, and some would even say, unlikely. The United States, on the one hand, and Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia on the other, are exerting significant diplomatic pressure to bridge the current gaps and bring the two sides back to the negotiating table. But what about those who seek to obstruct such efforts? Chief among this camp is the Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas. Through numerous statements and acts of violence, Hamas seemed intent on attracting attention during this period of negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Jerusalem – New Military Order Limits West Bank Palestinian Access
    February 2006 Special Focus Humanitarian Reports Humanitarian Assistance in the oPt Humanitarian Events Monitoring Issues Special Focus: Access to Jerusalem – New Military Order Limits West Bank Palestinian Access As the Barrier nears completion around Jerusalem, recent Israeli The eight other crossings are less time-consuming - drivers and their military orders further restrict West Bank Palestinian pedestrian and passengers generally drive through a checkpoint encountering only vehicle access into Jerusalem.1 These orders integrate the Barrier random ID checks. crossing regime into the closure system and limit West Bank Palestinian traffic into Jerusalem to four Barrier crossings (see map Reduced access to religious sites: below): Qalandiya from the north, Gilo from the south2, Shu’fat camp The ability of the Muslim and Christian communities in the West from the east and Ras Abu Sbeitan (Olive) for pedestrian residents Bank to freely access holy sites in Jerusalem is an additional of Abu Dis, and Al ‘Eizariya.3 concern. With these orders, for example, all three major routes between Jerusalem and Bethlehem (Tunnel road, original Road 60 Currently, there are 12 routes and crossings to enter Jerusalem from (Gilo) and Ein Yalow) will be blocked for Palestinian use. the West Bank including the four in the Barrier (see detailed map Christian and Muslim residents of Bethlehem and the surrounding attached). The eight other routes and crossing points into Jerusalem, villages will in the future access Jerusalem through one barrier now closed to West Bank Palestinians, will remain open to residents crossing and only if a permit has been obtained from the Israeli Civil of Israel including those living in settlements, persons of Jewish Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cincinnati
    U UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: 05-20-2009 I, Shadi Y. Saleh , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master in Architecture It is entitled: Designing by Community Participation: Meeting the Challenges of the Palestinian Refugee Camps Shadi Saleh Student Signature: This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: Elizabeth Riorden Thomas Bible Approval of the electronic document: I have reviewed the Thesis/Dissertation in its final electronic format and certify that it is an accurate copy of the document reviewed and approved by the committee. Committee Chair signature: Elizabeth Riorden Designing by Community Participation: Meeting the Challenges of the Palestinian Refugee Camps A thesis submitted to the Division of Research and Advance Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Architecture In the school of Architecture and Interior design Of the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning 2009 By Shadi Y. Saleh Committee chair Elizabeth Riorden Thomas Bible ABSTRACT Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria are the result of the sudden population displacements of 1948 and 1967. After 60 years, unorganized urban growth compounds the situation. The absence of state support pushed the refugees to take matters into their own hands. Currently the camps have problems stemming from both the social situation and the degradation of the built environment. Keeping the refugee camps in order to “represent” a nation in exile does not mean to me that there should be no development. The thesis seeks to make a contribution in solving the social and environmental problems in a way that emphasizes the Right of Return.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Gaza: the Challenge of Clans and Families
    INSIDE GAZA: THE CHALLENGE OF CLANS AND FAMILIES Middle East Report N°71 – 20 December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION: THE DYNAMICS OF CHANGE ............................................... 1 II. THE CHANGING FORTUNES OF KINSHIP NETWORKS................................... 2 A. THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY AND CLAN POLITICS .............................................................2 B. THE 2000 UPRISING AND THE RISE OF CLAN POWER.............................................................3 C. ISRAEL’S GAZA DISENGAGEMENT AND FACTIONAL CONFLICT..............................................3 D. BETWEEN THE 2006 ELECTIONS AND HAMAS’S 2007 SEIZURE OF POWER.............................5 III. KINSHIP NETWORKS IN OPERATION .................................................................. 6 A. ECONOMIC SUPPORT .............................................................................................................6 B. FEUDS AND INFORMAL JUSTICE.............................................................................................7 C. POLITICAL AND SECURITY LEVERAGE...................................................................................9 IV. THE CLANS AND HAMAS........................................................................................ 13 A. BETWEEN GOVERNANCE AND CHAOS .................................................................................13 B. HAMAS’S SEIZURE OF POWER .............................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Forces
    Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax : 1 (202) 457 -8746 Email: [email protected] Palestinian Forces Palestinian Authority and Militant Forces Anthony H. Cordesman Center for Strategic and International Studies [email protected] Rough Working Draft: Revised February 9, 2006 Copyright, Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. May not be reproduced, referenced, quote d, or excerpted without the written permission of the author. Cordesman: Palestinian Forces 2/9/06 Page 2 ROUGH WORKING DRAFT: REVISED FEBRUARY 9, 2006 ................................ ................................ ............ 1 THE MILITARY FORCES OF PALESTINE ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 2 THE OSLO ACCORDS AND THE NEW ISRAELI -PALESTINIAN WAR ................................ ................................ .............. 3 THE DEATH OF ARAFAT AND THE VICTORY OF HAMAS : REDEFINING PALESTINIAN POLITICS AND THE ARAB - ISRAELI MILITARY BALANCE ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 4 THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY FORC ES ................................ ................................ .......... 5 Palestinian Authority Forces During the Peace Process ................................ ................................ ..................... 6 The
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficiary and Community Perspectives on the Palestinian National Cash Transfer Programme
    TRANSFORMING COUNTRY BRIEFING CASH TRANSFERS Beneficiary and community perspectives on the Palestinian National Cash Transfer Programme transformingcashtransfers.org Introduction transformingcashtransfers.org Our research aimed to explore the perceptions of cash transfer programme beneficiaries and implementers and other community members, in order to ensure their views are better reflected in policy and programming. Introduction transformingcashtransfers.org There is growing evidence internationally of positive links Key points: between social protection and poverty and vulnerability reduction. However, there has been limited recognition of the • De-developmental policies, recurring social inequalities that perpetuate poverty, such as gender insecurity and dependency on donor inequality, unequal citizenship status and displacement funding are among the key challenges through conflict, and the role social protection can play in in advancing social protection in the tackling these interlinked socio-political vulnerabilities. Occupied Palestinian Territories. • The Palestinian National Cash Transfer This country briefing synthesises qualitative research focusing Programme is an important but on beneficiary and community perceptions of the Palestinian limited component of female-headed National Cash Transfer Programme (PNCTP) in Gaza1 and households’ coping repertoires. West Bank2, as part of a broader research project in five countries (Kenya, Mozambique, OPT, Uganda and Yemen) by • Programme governance requires urgent the Overseas Development
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning Analyses of Refugee Camps, Jabalia As Case Study-Gaza Strip, Palestine
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391 Urban Planning Analyses of Refugee Camps, Jabalia as Case Study-Gaza Strip, Palestine Dr. Usama Ibrahim Badawy1, Dr Ra’ed A. Salha2, Dr. Muain Qasem Jawabrah3, Amjad Jarada4 Mohammed A. EL Hawajri5 1Former Professor of Architecture, Birzeit University Palestine, works currently at UNRWA 2Assistant Professor, Islamic University of Gaza in Geography and GIS Palestine 3Assistance Professor, Architecture Department, Birzeit University Palestine 4Researcher in Infrastructure Planning and Development works currently at UNRWA, G, 5Researcher Geography subjects, works currently as teacher by the Ministry of Education Abstract: The Gaza Strip is a tight area with more than 1.8 million inhabitants. Since the beginning of the last century, and as other Palestinian areas, Gaza Strip was subject to direct occupation. The occupation tightened laws and regulations and increased obstacles, meanwhile it established settlements in a method that besieges existing Palestinian urban areas and leads them to develop in a way that serves the occupation, particularly the security side. This research begins with background information on Palestinian refugees in Gaza, sees that camp Improvement Strategies should called for adoption of the future urban planning, increasing the accommodation capacity of the built-up area, activating the environmental resources protection laws and played down the issue of the land properties when preparing the comprehensive plans. In this study reviews options for addressing the problems faced by Palestinian refugees in Gaza, Recommendations: After discussing the topic through a analyses of the Current Conditions , Land availability, Population distribution, Land requirements, Overcrowding, Public Spaces problems inside the camps , Sustainability in Gaza Strip, socio-economic situation , Unemployment problem and Population density in Jabalia Camp.
    [Show full text]