'A WANT of GOOD FEELING' a Reassessment of the Economic and Political Causes of the Rural Unrest in Hampshire, 1830
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Proc. Hampsh. Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 43, 1987, 237-254 'A WANT OF GOOD FEELING' A Reassessment of the Economic and Political Causes of the Rural Unrest in Hampshire, 1830 By BETHANIE AFTON ABSTRACT tension resulted in widespread unrest in Southern England. It began in June with an This article analyses the early nineteenth century arson attack in Kent. From there it spread, agrarian community in Hampshire at a moment of slowly at first, until, by December, few coun- crisis: the riots of 1830. The traditional relationships ties south of the Humber were left unaffected. within the community were put under pressure by a Hampshire, where the actual rioting lasted combination of post-war depression, overpopulation only ten days, from the 17th of November until and the introduction of new ideas and techniques. The the 26th, was one of the most severely affected resultant economic distress felt by a major part of counties (see Figs 1-2). On the 19th and 20th society, the small farmers, traders, craftsmen, and, of November a large mob from several parishes most of all, agricultural labourers, was ignited by roamed between Sutton Scotney and East political tension into an open, widespread revolt. The Stratton extorting money for food and beer, more modem industrial and* commercial attitudes from breaking agricultural machinery, and outside Hampshire were threatening traditional assaulting those who refused their requests. authority and subservience. The revolt was an early, On the 20th, Taskers Waterloo Iron Foundry tentative step out of the essentially rural community at Upper Clatford was severely damaged by a into modem industrial society. The subject of the 1830 crowd of several hundred people. Another unrest has been studied before. In 1937 A M Colson crowd destroyed machinery at an agricultural wrote of the 'agricultural labourers revolt' in an MA engineering factory and a flax spinning/sack thesis. This is an invaluable work especially because it weaving mill near Fordingbridge. On the 22nd centralizes many sources of information, including and 23rd a crowd of up to 1700 damaged the Home Office Papers, the Northbrook Papers, and poor houses at Selborne and Headley and newspaper reports. However, it views history in more demanded a reduction in the tithes from the traditional ways before the wealth of local material local rector. Throughout the county riots, which is available today had been collected together in 'extortion', and machine breaking were daily county record offices. In Captain Swing, E L events (HC 27/12/1830). Hobsbawm and G Rude again study the rioting as a An analysis of the events which occurred national problem which leads to inaccuracies when the during November, 1830, gives an indication of model they devise is related to Hampshire. However, the labourers' reaction to the situation in they do recognize the need for localized studies. This which they found themselves (see Fig 3). article approaches the study using the methods and There were two types of incident. First, there attitudes of local historical investigation and, were the generally clandestine actions, arson consquently, reassesses certain traditionally held views and threats, which were often carried out as on the unrest. revenge for some past grievance (BSP Poor Laws, 1834, 423e, 426e, 439e). This type of THE EVENTS AND RESPONSES TO THE crime, a typical reaction to rural disaffection, 1830 UNREST was most common in the early days of the 1830 unrest in south-eastern England. It was, In 1830 agricultural depression and political however, the second type of incident, the open, 238 HAMPSHIRE FIELD CLUB AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY .10 miles | | Parishes recording no unrest ["*! Parishes recording unrest Parishes in which sentences of jyTj transportation or death were recorded Fig 1. The 1830 unrest in Hampshire. Sources: HRO 14M50/2; The Times; Hampshire Chronicle. collective action, which distinguished the 1830 anger tended to be anything which symbolized agitation in Hampshire. The large numbers of the hardship they had experienced. Because labourers, craftsmen, artisans, and small the workers felt a special grievance against farmers who gathered together to protest labour-reducing machinery, all types of agri- about their conditions was unusual (Charles- cultural implements, especially threshing worth 1983, 131-155). The targets of their machines, were attacked. Forty-two parishes AFTON: RURAL UNREST IN HAMPSHIRE, 1830 239 Clandestine Acts Collective Actions 0 5 10 15 20 Number of Parishes Affected Fig 2. The number of daily incidents in November 1830 in Hampshire. Sources: HRO 14M50/2; The Times; Hampshire Chronicle. See Appendix for data. reported machine breaking. The Parish Reg- obliged to submit to see the destruction of ister of Amport records: their property. (HRO 43M67/A PR5) The 21st of November 1830 Such wage demands, as well as protests about This day will be memorable in the annels of poor relief and tithes, were fairly common. Yet this Parish. The Labourers were in a body diere was little real violence, and, of the 12 destroyed evey Threshing Machine and evey cases of assault which were reported, the only other Machine of any description and all one which caused actual injury was committed cast iron work; and demanded an increase of against William Bingham Baring, a member of wages, which demand was granted - the one of the most influential landowning wage been tried at 12s per week for able families in the county. The most frequently Bodied Labourers - above 20 and 9s per recorded occurrence was 'extortion'. This was week for lads above 16. This rising was legally robbery with menace from a person and general throughout the County and there was a capital offence. In reality it was far less being no force to repel violence, all were serious consisting largely of demands for beer 240 HAMPSHIRE FIELD CLUB AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY [I] Clandestine Acts Threats Hi; Arson Collective Action Assault Incitement to Riot Extortion Tithe Riots Wage Meetings Poor House Riots Machine Breaking Others 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Number of Parishes Reporting an Incident on any One Day Fig 3. Recorded incidents of the 1830 unrest. Sources: HRO 14M50/2; The Times; Hampshire Chronicle. See Appendix for data. and money. The riots often had a festive further sentences of death were recorded, atmosphere with the demands reminiscent of thirty-six men were to be transported, seven- the contributions collected by waits and mum- teen men were sentenced to hard labour, and mers at village fetes (Hobsbawm & Rude, forty-three men received gaol sentences of 1973, 45). Sixty-six cases of extortion were various terms (HRO 14M50/4). Within days committed for trial. By December 1830, 342 efforts were being made to modify the punish- men were awaiting trial at a Special Commiss- ments. After numerous petitions to the King ion of Assize in Winchester (HRO 14M50/2; and the court, only two men, James Cooper The Times 21/12/1830-3/1/1831). who led the attack on the factories near Ford- At the trial a candid effort was made to set ingbridge, and Henry Cooke who assaulted an example of those committed in order to and allegedly tried to murder Willam Bingham warn others of the consequences of such Baring, were executed {The Times 3/1/1831). collective crime (HRO 14M50/4). Memories of The latter was the most violent action of the the Bread and Blood Riots in East Anglia in Hampshire unrest, with The Times, sympathetic 1816, of the Luddite machine breaking in the towards the other defendants, reporting that North between 1811 and 1816, and of the Cooke had a cruel disposition and deserved his Peterloo Massacre in 1819, were fresh in the punishment (ibid). The other ninety-nine men minds of the authorities. With no police force, who had been sentenced to death were trans- agrarian agitation was especially difficult to ported for life. contain. There was very real anxiety that the In 1834 the House of Commons published revolt in the southern counties would ignite the findings of a Royal Commission on the into national revolution if it were allowed to Administration and Operation of the Poor spread into northern industrial areas (HRO Laws. Question 53 had asked for information 14M50/3). However, the severity of the court relating to the causes and consequences of the shocked even the magistrates involved. Many Agricultural Riots and Burnings of 1830-31. witnesses testified to the previous good cha- The fifty-four responses from Hampshire racter of the defendants. In spite of this, six varied widely in nature. They displayed per- men were sentenced to be hanged, ninety-five sonal biases and the limitations on freedom of AFTON: RURAL IJNRRST IN HAMPSHIRE, 1830 \ll\ Economic Low Wages 3 • Political System of Poor Relief TTWTTTTWmTSTJ Overpopulation/Underemployment llli High Labourers' Rents \llli High Tenants* Rents IT] Tithes ••I41>tlilll3 Introduction of Machinery Loss of Customary Rights Revolution in Europe Bad Influence of Road Gangs Riots in other Counties Unequal Treatment under the Law 'Inflammatory Publications New Beer-shops Influence of Demogogues 0 5 10 15 20 Frequency of Responses Fig 4. Perceived causes of the 1830 rioting and burning. Source: Responses to question 53, Royal Commission on the Administration and Operation of the Poor Laws, app. B, part V. expression that could occur. Fourteen participating in the riots..An anonymous reply respondents either would not or could not from Minstead in southwestern Hampshire answer the question. O A Baker, Churchwar- suggested: den from Easton, a parish dominated by the Duke of Buckingham and Chandos, wrote, 'I The cause was the want of good feeling have my opinion as to the cause, but would which ought and used to exist between the rather not express it' (BSP Poor laws 1834, Farmer and the Labourer; the former of 427e).