DOCSLIB.ORG

14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–12 Edition) § 25.1503

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–12 Edition) § 25.1503 § 25.1503 14 CFR Ch. I (1–1–12 Edition) OPERATING LIMITATIONS gear, as determined under § 25.729 or by flight characteristics. If the extension § 25.1503 Airspeed limitations: general. speed is not the same as the retraction When airspeed limitations are a func- speed, the two speeds must be des- tion of weight, weight distribution, al- ignated as VLO(EXT) and VLO(RET), re- titude, or Mach number, limitations spectively. corresponding to each critical com- (b) The established landing gear ex- bination of these factors must be estab- tended speed VLE may not exceed the lished. speed at which it is safe to fly with the landing gear secured in the fully ex- § 25.1505 Maximum operating limit tended position, and that determined speed. under § 25.729. The maximum operating limit speed [Doc. No. 5066, 29 FR 18291, Dec. 24, 1964, as (VMO/MMO airspeed or Mach Number, amended by Amdt. 25–38, 41 FR 55468, Dec. 20, whichever is critical at a particular al- 1976] titude) is a speed that may not be de- liberately exceeded in any regime of § 25.1516 Other speed limitations. flight (climb, cruise, or descent), unless Any other limitation associated with a higher speed is authorized for flight speed must be established. test or pilot training operations. V / MO [Doc. No. 2000–8511, 66 FR 34024, June 26, 2001] MMO must be established so that it is not greater than the design cruising § 25.1517 Rough air speed, VRA. speed V and so that it is sufficiently C A rough air speed, V , for use as the below V /M or V /M to make it RA D D DF DF, recommended turbulence penetration highly improbable that the latter airspeed in § 25.1585(a)(8), must be es- speeds will be inadvertently exceeded tablished, which— in operations. The speed margin be- (1) Is not greater than the design air- tween V /M and V /M or V M/ MO MO D D DF DF speed for maximum gust intensity, se- may not be less than that determined lected for V ; and under § 25.335(b) or found necessary dur- B (2) Is not less than the minimum ing the flight tests conducted under value of V specified in § 25.335(d); and § 25.253. B (3) Is sufficiently less than VMO to en- [Amdt. 25–23, 35 FR 5680, Apr. 8, 1970] sure that likely speed variation during rough air encounters will not cause the § 25.1507 Maneuvering speed. overspeed warning to operate too fre- The maneuvering speed must be es- quently. In the absence of a rational tablished so that it does not exceed the investigation substantiating the use of design maneuvering speed VA deter- other values, VRA must be less than mined under § 25.335(c). VMO—35 knots (TAS). [Doc. No. 27902, 61 FR 5222, Feb. 9, 1996] § 25.1511 Flap extended speed. The established flap extended speed § 25.1519 Weight, center of gravity, and VFE must be established so that it does weight distribution. not exceed the design flap speed VF The airplane weight, center of grav- chosen under §§ 25.335(e) and 25.345, for ity, and weight distribution limita- the corresponding flap positions and tions determined under §§ 25.23 through engine powers. 25.27 must be established as operating limitations. § 25.1513 Minimum control speed. The minimum control speed VMC de- § 25.1521 Powerplant limitations. termined under § 25.149 must be estab- (a) General. The powerplant limita- lished as an operating limitation. tions prescribed in this section must be established so that they do not exceed § 25.1515 Landing gear speeds. the corresponding limits for which the (a) The established landing gear oper- engines or propellers are type certifi- ating speed or speeds, VLO, may not ex- cated and do not exceed the values on ceed the speed at which it is safe both which compliance with any other re- to extend and to retract the landing quirement of this part is based. 526 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:30 Mar 22, 2012 Jkt 226044 PO 00000 Frm 00536 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\226044.XXX 226044 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with CFR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Difference Between Higher and Lower Flap Setting Configurations May Seem Small, but at Today's Fuel Prices the Savings Can Be Substantial
    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HIGHER AND LOWER FLAP SETTING CONFIGURATIONS MAY SEEM SMALL, BUT AT TODAY'S FUEL PRICES THE SAVINGS CAN BE SUBSTANTIAL. 24 AERO QUARTERLY QTR_04 | 08 Fuel Conservation Strategies: Takeoff and Climb By William Roberson, Senior Safety Pilot, Flight Operations; and James A. Johns, Flight Operations Engineer, Flight Operations Engineering This article is the third in a series exploring fuel conservation strategies. Every takeoff is an opportunity to save fuel. If each takeoff and climb is performed efficiently, an airline can realize significant savings over time. But what constitutes an efficient takeoff? How should a climb be executed for maximum fuel savings? The most efficient flights actually begin long before the airplane is cleared for takeoff. This article discusses strategies for fuel savings But times have clearly changed. Jet fuel prices fuel burn from brake release to a pressure altitude during the takeoff and climb phases of flight. have increased over five times from 1990 to 2008. of 10,000 feet (3,048 meters), assuming an accel­ Subse quent articles in this series will deal with At this time, fuel is about 40 percent of a typical eration altitude of 3,000 feet (914 meters) above the descent, approach, and landing phases of airline’s total operating cost. As a result, airlines ground level (AGL). In all cases, however, the flap flight, as well as auxiliary­power­unit usage are reviewing all phases of flight to determine how setting must be appropriate for the situation to strategies. The first article in this series, “Cost fuel burn savings can be gained in each phase ensure airplane safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Using an Autothrottle to Compare Techniques for Saving Fuel on A
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2010 Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft Rebecca Marie Johnson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Rebecca Marie, "Using an autothrottle ot compare techniques for saving fuel on a regional jet aircraft" (2010). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 11358. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11358 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using an autothrottle to compare techniques for saving fuel on A regional jet aircraft by Rebecca Marie Johnson A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Electrical Engineering Program of Study Committee: Umesh Vaidya, Major Professor Qingze Zou Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2010 Copyright c Rebecca Marie Johnson, 2010. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I gratefully acknowledge everyone who contributed to the successful completion of this research. Bill Piche, my supervisor at Rockwell Collins, was supportive from day one, as were many of my colleagues. I also appreciate the efforts of my thesis committee, Drs. Umesh Vaidya, Qingze Zou, and Baskar Ganapathayasubramanian. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Actuating Flaps on Bird and Aircraft Wings 437
    Self-actuating flaps on bird and aircraft wings D.W. Bechert, W. Hage & R. Meyer Department of Turbulence Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Berlin, Germany. Abstract Separation control is also an important issue in biology. During the landing approach of birds and in flight through very turbulent air, one observes that the covering feathers on the upper side of bird wings tend to pop up. The raised feathers impede the spreading of the flow separation from the trailing edge to the leading edge of the wing. This mechanism of separation control by bird feathers is described in detail. Self-activated movable flaps (= artificial bird feathers) represent a high-lift system enhancing the maximum lift of airfoils up to 20%. This is achieved without perceivable deleterious effects under cruise conditions. Several data of wind tunnel experiments as well as flight experiments with an aircraft with laminar wing and movable flaps are shown. 1 Movable flaps on wings: artificial bird feathers The issue of artificial feathers on wings, has an almost anecdotal origin. Wolfgang Liebe, the inventor of the boundary layer fence once observed mountain crows in the Alps in the 1930s. He noticed that the covering feathers on the upper side of the wings tend to pop up when the birds were on landing approach or in other situations with high angle of attack, like flight through gusts. Once the attention of the observer is drawn to it, it is comparatively easy to observe this behaviour in almost any bird (see, for example, the feathers on the left-hand wing of a Skua in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Trailing Vortex Attenuation Devices
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1985 Trailing vortex attenuation devices. Heffernan, Kenneth G. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21590 DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARY NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA 93^43 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS TRAILING VORTEX ATTENUATION DEVICES by Kenneth G. Heffernan June 1985 Thesis Advisor: T. Sarpkaya Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited, T223063 Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Data Entered) REPORT READ INSTRUCTIONS DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER 4. TITLE (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT A PERIOD COVERED Dual Master's Thesis; Trailing Vortex Attenuation Devices June 1985 S. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER 7. AUTHORC»> 8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERC*.) Kenneth G. Heffernan 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND AODRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT, TASK AREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 93943 I. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE June 1985 Naval Postgraduate Schodl 13. NUMBER OF PAGES Monterey, California 93943 109 U. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 4 ADDRESSf/f different from Controlling OHicm) 15. SECURITY CLASS, (ol (his report) Unclassified 15a. DECLASSIFICATION/ DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE 16. DISTRIBUTION ST ATEMEN T (of this Report) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol the abstract entered In Block 20, If different from Report) 18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse aide It necessary and Identify by block number) Trailing Vortices 20. ABSTRACT fConl/nu» on reverse side It necessary and Identity by block number) Trailing vortices generated by large aircraft pose a serious hazard to other planes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Design of Control Surfaces
    Aileron Design Chapter 12 Design of Control Surfaces From: Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach Mohammad Sadraey 792 pages September 2012, Hardcover Wiley Publications 12.4.1. Introduction The primary function of an aileron is the lateral (i.e. roll) control of an aircraft; however, it also affects the directional control. Due to this reason, the aileron and the rudder are usually designed concurrently. Lateral control is governed primarily through a roll rate (P). Aileron is structurally part of the wing, and has two pieces; each located on the trailing edge of the outer portion of the wing left and right sections. Both ailerons are often used symmetrically, hence their geometries are identical. Aileron effectiveness is a measure of how good the deflected aileron is producing the desired rolling moment. The generated rolling moment is a function of aileron size, aileron deflection, and its distance from the aircraft fuselage centerline. Unlike rudder and elevator which are displacement control, the aileron is a rate control. Any change in the aileron geometry or deflection will change the roll rate; which subsequently varies constantly the roll angle. The deflection of any control surface including the aileron involves a hinge moment. The hinge moments are the aerodynamic moments that must be overcome to deflect the control surfaces. The hinge moment governs the magnitude of augmented pilot force required to move the corresponding actuator to deflect the control surface. To minimize the size and thus the cost of the actuation system, the ailerons should be designed so that the control forces are as low as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Zap Flaps and Ailerons by TEMPLE N
    AER-56-5 Zap Flaps and Ailerons By TEMPLE N. JOYCE,1 DUNDALK, BALTIMORE, MD. The early history of the Zap development is covered, in­ been looked upon with more or less contempt. This was par­ cluding work done on the Flettner rotor plane in 1928. ticularly true during the boom days when everybody was using Because of phenomenal lift obtained by changes in flow a new engine and when landing speeds were thought of only in around a cylinder, investigations were begun on improving terms of getting into recognized airports. Three things have existing airfoils. This led to preliminary work on flapped occurred since then, however, that have again brought to the airfoils in the tunnel of New York University, and later its front the importance of low landing speed: First, a very distinct application to an Aristocrat cabin monoplane presented to realization that the public was afraid of aviation because of high the B/J Aircraft Corporation early in 1932. A chronological stalling speeds and the frequent crack-ups with serious conse­ record of the reactions of the personnel of the B/J organi­ quences. Second, the fact that increased high speeds could not zation to the Zap development is set forth, particularly be obtained without increasing still further high landing speeds the questions regarding lift and drag coefficients, effect unless some new aerodynamic development was brought into upon stability and balance, and the operating forces neces­ existence. Third, as speed ranges and wing loadings went up, sary to get the flaps down. The effectiveness of lateral takeoff run was increased and angle of climb decreased alarm­ control, particularly with regard to hinge moments and ingly.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Jet-Flap Interaction
    Reducing Propulsion Airframe Aeroacoustic Interactions with Uniquely Tailored Chevrons: 3. Jet-Flap Interaction Vinod G. Mengle*, Leon Brusniak†, Ronen Elkoby‡ The Boeing Company, Seattle, WA 98124-2207 and Russ H. Thomas§ NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681-2199 Propulsion airframe aeroacoustic (PAA) interactions, resulting from the integration of engine and airframe, lead to azimuthal asymmetries in the flow/acoustic field, e.g., due to the interaction between the exhaust jet flow and the pylon, the wing and its high-lift devices, such as, flaps and flaperons. In the first two parts of this series we have presented experimental results which show that isolated and installed nozzles with azimuthally varying chevrons (AVCs) can reduce noise more than conventional chevrons when integrated with a pylon and a wing with flaps at take-off conditions. In this paper, we present model-scale experimental results for the reduction of jet-flap interaction noise source due to these AVCs and document the PAA installation effects (difference in noise between installed and isolated nozzle configurations) at both approach and take-off conditions. It is found that the installation effects of both types of chevron nozzles, AVCs and conventional, are reversed at approach and take-off, in that there is more installed noise reduction at approach and less at take-off compared to that of the isolated nozzles. Moreover, certain AVCs give larger total installed noise benefits at both conditions compared to conventional chevrons. Phased microphone array results show that at approach conditions (large flap deflection, low jet speed and low ambient Mach number), chevrons gain more noise benefit from reducing jet- flap interaction noise than they do from quieting the jet plume noise source which is already weak at these low jet speeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10: Ailerons & Flaps
    CHAPTER 10: AILERONS & FLAPS REVISIONS From time to time, revisions to this assembly manual may be deemed necessary. When such revisions are made, you should immediately replace all outdated pages with the revised pages. Discard the out dated . pages. Note that on the lower right corner of each page is a "revision date". Initial printings will have the number "O" printed and the printing date. All subsequent revisions will have the revision number followed by the date of that revision. When such revisions are made, a "table of revisions" page will also be issued. This page (or pages) should be inserted in front of the opening page (this page) of each affected chapter. A new "table of revisions" page will accompany any revision made to a chapter. Arrows Most drawings will have arrows to show which direction the parts are facing, unless the drawing itself makes that very obvious. "A/C UP'refers to the direction that would be up if the part were installed in a plane sitting in the upright position. In most cases the part shown will be oriented in the same position as the part itself will be placed during that particular assembly step. However, time goes on and changes are made, so careful attention should be paid to the orientation arrows. That old cartoon of the guy agonizing over the plans for hls canoe, built one end up, one end down, should not happen in real life. Especially to you. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DRAWING LIST 3. SPECIAL PARTS, TOOLS & SUPPLIES LIST A. PARTS B.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft De-Icing/Anti-Icing
    Aircraft De-Icing/Anti-Icing Standard Practices Procedure (1)Make sure that all loose snow is removed from the aircraft before you do the de-icing/anti- icing procedures. WARNING: FOR SUFFICIENT HOLDOVER TIME, MAKE SURE THE FREEZING POINT OF THE DE-ICING/ANTI-ICING MIXTURE IS LESS THAN THE AIRCRAFT AND AMBIENT TEMPERATURES. THE HOLDOVER TIME WILL ALSO DECREASE DURING THE CONDITIONS THAT FOLLOW: THERE ARE STRONG WINDS THERE IS PRECIPITATION THE AMBIENT TEMPERATURE DECREASES THERE ARE WINDS CAUSED BY OTHER AIRCRAFT ENGINES THE AIRCRAFT FUEL TEMPERATURE ADJACENT TO THE SKIN IS LESS THAN THE AMBIENT TEMPERATURE. IF YOU DO NOT OBEY THIS WARNING, THE HOLDOVER TIME WILL DECREASE. THIS CAN CAUSE INJURY TO PERSONS AND DAMAGE TO THE EQUIPMENT. WARNING: IF YOU DO THE ANTI-ICING PROCEDURE MORE THAN ONCE, DO THE DE-ICING PROCEDURE AGAIN ALSO. MORE THAN ONE LAYER OF ANTI- ICING WILL CHANGE THE AERODYNAMIC PROPERTY OF THE WINGS. THIS CAN CAUSE INJURIES TO PERSONS AND DAMAGE TO EQUIPMENT. (2)Obey the precautions and standard practices that follow when you do the de-icing/anti-icing procedures: (a)The APU should be shut down for all anti-icing/de-icing operations. (b)If it is necessary to operate the engines or the APU while you do the de-icing/anti-icing procedures, obey the precautions that follow: 1 Make sure that the engines are at idle speed. 2 Make sure that all bleed air valves are closed. 3 Make sure that all the external lights in the de-icing/anti-icing area are off. 4 Make sure the valves for the air conditioning unit are off.
    [Show full text]
  • Ac 25-15 11/20/89
    Advisory us. Departmenf of Tronsportafion Federal Aviation Circular Administration Subject: APPROVAL OF FLIGHT MANAGEMENT Date: 11/20/89 AC No: 25-15 SYSTEMS IN TRANSPORT CATEGORY Initiated by: ANM-110 Change: AIRPLANES 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) provides guidance material for the airworthiness approval of flight management systems (FMS} in transport category airplanes. Like all AC material, this AC is not mandatory and does not constitute a regulation. It is issued for guidance purposes and to outline a method of compliance with the rules. In lieu of following this method without deviation, the applicant may elect to follow an alternate method, provided the alternate method is also found by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA} to be an acceptable means of complying with the requirements of Part 25. Because the method of compliance presented in this AC is not mandatory, the terms II sha11" and "must II used herein apply on1y to an applicant who chooses to follow this particular method without deviation. 2. RELATED DOCUMENTS. a. Related Federal Aviation Regulations {FAR}. Portions of Part 25 and a portion of Part 121, as presently written, can be applied for the design, substantiation, and certification of FMS for transport category airplanes. Sections which prescribe requirements for these types of systems include: § 25.101 Performance: General. § 25 .103 Stalling speed. § 25.105 Takeoff. § 25.107 Takeoff speeds. § 25.109 Accelerate-stop distance. § 25.111 Takeoff path. § 25.113 Takeoff distance and takeoff run. § 25.115 Takeoff flight path. § 25.117 Climb: general. § 25.119 Landing climb: All-engines-operating. § 25.121 Climb: One-engine-inoperative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Final Approach Speed
    Flight Safety Foundation Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction Tool Kit FSF ALAR Briefing Note 8.2 — The Final Approach Speed Assuring a safe landing requires achieving a balanced • Wind; distribution of safety margins between: • Flap configuration (when several flap configurations are • The computed final approach speed (also called the certified for landing); target threshold speed); and, • Aircraft systems status (airspeed corrections for • The resulting landing distance. abnormal configurations); • Icing conditions; and, Statistical Data • Use of autothrottle speed mode or autoland. Computation of the final approach speed rarely is a factor The final approach speed is based on the reference landing in runway overrun events, but an approach conducted speed, VREF. significantly faster than the computed target final approach speed is cited often as a causal factor. VREF usually is defined by the aircraft operating manual (AOM) and/or the quick reference handbook (QRH) as: The Flight Safety Foundation Approach-and-landing Accident Reduction (ALAR) Task Force found that “high-energy” 1.3 x stall speed with full landing flaps approaches were a causal factor1 in 30 percent of 76 approach- or with selected landing flaps. and-landing accidents and serious incidents worldwide in 1984 through 1997.2 Final approach speed is defined as: Defining the Final Approach Speed VREF + corrections. The final approach speed is the airspeed to be maintained down Airspeed corrections are based on operational factors (e.g., to 50 feet over the runway threshold. wind, wind shear or icing) and on landing configuration (e.g., less than full flaps or abnormal configuration). The final approach speed computation is the result of a decision made by the flight crew to ensure the safest approach and The resulting final approach speed provides the best landing for the following: compromise between handling qualities (stall margin or • Gross weight; controllability/maneuverability) and landing distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Flap & Aileron Gap Seals
    Flap & Aileron Gap Seals by Jack Sobelman The two upper outboard right-wing skins on my Twin Comanche had just been replaced. I looked down upon one of the ailerons. Through an opening in the aileron I saw something that really irritated me. It was my foot! The fact that I could see my foot while looking down thru the wing meant that air from the bottom of the wing could easily escape out of the top. This results in a loss of lift and increased drag, neither being desirable. A good look underneath where the flaps and ailerons meet the wing revealed some ugly things for air making its way across the bottom of the wing surface. It also allowed any higher- pressure air that entered the wing via the wheel wells to travel outward inside the wing and exit out the gaps between the wing and the flaps & ailerons. In an article, Matt Kurke provided a way to plug some of the air leaks in the wheel wells. We followed his advice. I then began to research possible ways to minimize the flap & aileron gap problem. Two vendors offer complete wing flap and aileron gap seals, and one offers just flap gap seals for both the single and twin Comanche. Both Webco and Knots 2U offer a complete underwing gap seal kit that traverses the entire underside of each wing with a Teflon sealant along the contact points with the ailerons and flaps. The Webco and Knots 2U kits are similar in dimension, function, and installation requirements. Installation will take at or a little north of 40 man-hours.
    [Show full text]