(Porifera) Using Nuclear Encoded Housekeeping Genes Malcolm Hill University of Richmond, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Porifera) Using Nuclear Encoded Housekeeping Genes Malcolm Hill University of Richmond, Mhill2@Richmond.Edu University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Biology Faculty Publications Biology 1-2013 Reconstruction of Family-Level Phylogenetic Relationships within Demospongiae (Porifera) Using Nuclear Encoded Housekeeping Genes Malcolm Hill University of Richmond, [email protected] April L. Hill University of Richmond, [email protected] et. al. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/biology-faculty-publications Part of the Biology Commons, Genetics and Genomics Commons, Population Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Hill, Malcolm S., April L. Hill, Jose Lopez, Kevin J. Peterson, Shirley Pomponi, Maria C. Diaz, Robert W. Thacker, Maja Adamska, Nicole Boury-Esnault, Paco Cárdenas, Andia Chaves-Fonnegra, Elizabeth Danka, Bre-Onna De Laine, Dawn Formica, Eduardo Hajdu, Gisele Lobo-Hajdu, Sarah Klontz, Christine C. Morrow, Jignasa Patel, Bernard Picton, Davide Pisani, Deborah Pohlmann, Niamh E. Redmond, John Reed, Stacy Richey, Ana Riesgo, Ewelina Rubin, Zach Russell, Klaus Rützler, Erik A. Sperling, Michael Di Stefano, James E. Tarver, and Allen G. Collins. "Reconstruction of Family-Level Phylogenetic Relationships within Demospongiae (Porifera) Using Nuclear Encoded Housekeeping Genes." PLoS ONE 8, no. 1 (January 2013): e50437. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0050437. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reconstruction of Family-Level Phylogenetic Relationships within Demospongiae (Porifera) Using Nuclear Encoded Housekeeping Genes Malcolm S. Hill1, April L. Hill1, Jose Lopez2, Kevin J. Peterson3, Shirley Pomponi4, Maria C. Diaz5, Robert W. Thacker6, Maja Adamska7, Nicole Boury-Esnault8, Paco Ca´rdenas9, Andia Chaves-Fonnegra2, Elizabeth Danka1, Bre-Onna De Laine1, Dawn Formica2, Eduardo Hajdu10, Gisele Lobo-Hajdu11, Sarah Klontz12, Christine C. Morrow13, Jignasa Patel2, Bernard Picton14, Davide Pisani15, Deborah Pohlmann1, Niamh E. Redmond12, John Reed4, Stacy Richey1, Ana Riesgo16, Ewelina Rubin2, Zach Russell1, Klaus Ru¨ tzler12, Erik A. Sperling17, Michael di Stefano1, James E. Tarver18, Allen G. Collins12,19* 1 Gottwald Science Center, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America, 2 Nova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center, Dania Beach, Florida, United States of America, 3 Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America, 4 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, Fort Pierce, Florida, United States of America, 5 Museo Marino de Margarita, Boulevard de Boca Del Rio, Boca del Rio, Nueva Esparta, Venezuela, 6 Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America, 7 Sars International Centre for Marine Molecular Biology, Thormøhlensgt, Bergen, Norway, 8 IMBE-UMR7263 CNRS, Universite´ d’Aix-Marseille, Station marine d’Endoume, Marseille, France, 9 Department of Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, 10 Departamento de Invertebrados, Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 11 Departamento de Gene´tica, IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 12 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., United States of America, 13 School of Biological Sciences, MBC, Queen’s University, Belfast, United Kingdom, 14 National Museums Northern Ireland, Holywood, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, 15 School of Earth Sciences and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 16 Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, 17 Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, 18 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 19 National Systematics Laboratory of NOAA’s Fisheries Service, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., United States of America Abstract Background: Demosponges are challenging for phylogenetic systematics because of their plastic and relatively simple morphologies and many deep divergences between major clades. To improve understanding of the phylogenetic relationships within Demospongiae, we sequenced and analyzed seven nuclear housekeeping genes involved in a variety of cellular functions from a diverse group of sponges. Methodology/Principal Findings: We generated data from each of the four sponge classes (i.e., Calcarea, Demospongiae, Hexactinellida, and Homoscleromorpha), but focused on family-level relationships within demosponges. With data for 21 newly sampled families, our Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian-based approaches recovered previously phylogenetically defined taxa: Keratosap, Myxospongiaep, Spongillidap, Haploscleromorphap (the marine haplosclerids) and Democlaviap.We found conflicting results concerning the relationships of Keratosap and Myxospongiaep to the remaining demosponges, but our results strongly supported a clade of Haploscleromorphap+Spongillidap+Democlaviap. In contrast to hypotheses based on mitochondrial genome and ribosomal data, nuclear housekeeping gene data suggested that freshwater sponges (Spongillidap) are sister to Haploscleromorphap rather than part of Democlaviap. Within Keratosap, we found equivocal results as to the monophyly of Dictyoceratida. Within Myxospongiaep, Chondrosida and Verongida were monophyletic. A well- supported clade within Democlaviap, Tetractinellidap, composed of all sampled members of Astrophorina and Spirophorina (including the only lithistid in our analysis), was consistently revealed as the sister group to all other members of Democlaviap. Within Tetractinellidap, we did not recover monophyletic Astrophorina or Spirophorina. Our results also reaffirmed the monophyly of order Poecilosclerida (excluding Desmacellidae and Raspailiidae), and polyphyly of Hadromerida and Halichondrida. Conclusions/Significance: These results, using an independent nuclear gene set, confirmed many hypotheses based on ribosomal and/or mitochondrial genes, and they also identified clades with low statistical support or clades that conflicted with traditional morphological classification. Our results will serve as a basis for future exploration of these outstanding questions using more taxon- and gene-rich datasets. PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 January 2013 | Volume 8 | Issue 1 | e50437 Family-Level Phylogeny of Demospongiae Citation: Hill MS, Hill AL, Lopez J, Peterson KJ, Pomponi S, et al. (2013) Reconstruction of Family-Level Phylogenetic Relationships within Demospongiae (Porifera) Using Nuclear Encoded Housekeeping Genes. PLoS ONE 8(1): e50437. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050437 Editor: Senjie Lin, University of Connecticut, United States of America Received May 1, 2012; Accepted October 22, 2012; Published January 23, 2013 This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Assembling the Tree of Life Program (http://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ. jsp?pims_id = 5129; DEB awards 0829763, 0829783, 0829791, and 0829986). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. * E-mail: [email protected] Introduction housekeeping genes [18,44]. A broad correspondence in inferences about demosponge phylogeny exists between these three sets of Sponges belong to an ancient metazoan lineage with a fossil data (see discussion below), but both of the latter two sets of data record that stretches back to the late Cryogenian .635 Myr ago have been sampled from a far more limited number of taxa. The [1–3]. Some estimates place their appearance at nearly 800 Myr Porifera Tree of Life project (www.portol.org) employs a variety of ago [4,5]. As a sister group (or groups) to all the other animals in tools to integrate morphological and molecular data and to expand the metazoan tree of life, sponges represent a fulcrum point in the the diversity of sponge taxa used to elucidate all levels of sponge history of animal life lying at the junction between single-celled phylogeny. In this study, we report findings based on a significant ancestors and the rest of Metazoa. Sponges have also been expansion (38 new samples from 38 species representing 30 important ecosystem engineers throughout much of their history, families, including 21 families newly sampled) of the nuclear e.g., as major reef-builders during the Upper Devonian, Upper housekeeping gene dataset first developed for metazoan-wide Permian, and through a major portion of the Jurassic [6,7]. In phylogenetic and molecular dating analyses [45,46] and later modern oceans, poriferans continue to perform important applied by Sperling et
Recommended publications
  • Taxonomy and Diversity of the Sponge Fauna from Walters Shoal, a Shallow Seamount in the Western Indian Ocean Region
    Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region By Robyn Pauline Payne A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in the Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Supervisors: Dr Toufiek Samaai Prof. Mark J. Gibbons Dr Wayne K. Florence The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. December 2015 Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region Robyn Pauline Payne Keywords Indian Ocean Seamount Walters Shoal Sponges Taxonomy Systematics Diversity Biogeography ii Abstract Taxonomy and diversity of the sponge fauna from Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount in the Western Indian Ocean region R. P. Payne MSc Thesis, Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape. Seamounts are poorly understood ubiquitous undersea features, with less than 4% sampled for scientific purposes globally. Consequently, the fauna associated with seamounts in the Indian Ocean remains largely unknown, with less than 300 species recorded. One such feature within this region is Walters Shoal, a shallow seamount located on the South Madagascar Ridge, which is situated approximately 400 nautical miles south of Madagascar and 600 nautical miles east of South Africa. Even though it penetrates the euphotic zone (summit is 15 m below the sea surface) and is protected by the Southern Indian Ocean Deep- Sea Fishers Association, there is a paucity of biodiversity and oceanographic data.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Some Important Early Collections of West Indian Type Specimens, with Historical Notes
    Appendix: Some important early collections of West Indian type specimens, with historical notes Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 between 1841 and 1864, we gain additional information concerning the sponge memoir, starting with the letter dated 8 May 1855. Jacob Gysbert Samuel van Breda A biography of Placide Duchassaing de Fonbressin was (1788-1867) was professor of botany in Franeker (Hol­ published by his friend Sagot (1873). Although an aristo­ land), of botany and zoology in Gent (Belgium), and crat by birth, as we learn from Michelotti's last extant then of zoology and geology in Leyden. Later he went to letter to van Breda, Duchassaing did not add de Fon­ Haarlem, where he was secretary of the Hollandsche bressin to his name until 1864. Duchassaing was born Maatschappij der Wetenschappen, curator of its cabinet around 1819 on Guadeloupe, in a French-Creole family of natural history, and director of Teyler's Museum of of planters. He was sent to school in Paris, first to the minerals, fossils and physical instruments. Van Breda Lycee Louis-le-Grand, then to University. He finished traveled extensively in Europe collecting fossils, especial­ his studies in 1844 with a doctorate in medicine and two ly in Italy. Michelotti exchanged collections of fossils additional theses in geology and zoology. He then settled with him over a long period of time, and was received as on Guadeloupe as physician. Because of social unrest foreign member of the Hollandsche Maatschappij der after the freeing of native labor, he left Guadeloupe W etenschappen in 1842. The two chief papers of Miche­ around 1848, and visited several islands of the Antilles lotti on fossils were published by the Hollandsche Maat­ (notably Nevis, Sint Eustatius, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithistid’ Tetractinellid
    1 Systematics of ‘lithistid’ tetractinellid 2 demosponges from the Tropical Western 3 Atlantic – implications for phylodiversity 4 and bathymetric distribution 1,2 3 4 5 Astrid Schuster , Shirley A. Pomponi , Andrzej Pisera , Paco 5 6 1,7,8 1,8 6 Cardenas´ , Michelle Kelly , Gert Worheide¨ , and Dirk Erpenbeck 1 7 Department of Earth- & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology and Geobiology, 8 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ M ¨unchen, Richard-Wagner Str. 10, 80333 Munich, 9 Germany 2 10 Current address: Department of Biology, NordCEE, Southern University of Denmark, 11 Campusvej 55, 5300 M Odense, Denmark 3 12 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute, Florida Atlantic University, 5600 U.S. 1 North, 13 Ft Pierce, FL 34946, USA 4 14 Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Twarda 51/55, 00-818 15 Warszawa, Poland 5 16 Pharmacognosy, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala University, Husargatan 17 3, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden 6 18 National Centre for Coasts and Oceans, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric 19 Research, Private Bag 99940, Newmarket, Auckland, 1149, New Zealand 7 20 SNSB-Bayerische Staatssammlung f ¨urPalaontologie¨ und Geologie, Richard-Wagner 21 Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany 8 22 GeoBio-CenterLMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat¨ M ¨unchen, Richard-Wagner Str. 10, 23 80333 Munich, Germany 24 Corresponding author: 1,8 25 Dirk Erpenbeck 26 Email address: [email protected] 27 ABSTRACT PeerJ Preprints | https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27673v1 | CC BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 22 Apr 2019, publ: 22 Apr 2019 28 Background Among all present demosponges, lithistids represent a polyphyletic group with 29 exceptionally well preserved fossils dating back to the Cambrian.
    [Show full text]
  • A Soft Spot for Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution
    marine drugs Review A Soft Spot for Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge Secondary Metabolite Distribution Adrian Galitz 1 , Yoichi Nakao 2 , Peter J. Schupp 3,4 , Gert Wörheide 1,5,6 and Dirk Erpenbeck 1,5,* 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology & Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (G.W.) 2 Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan; [email protected] 3 Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111 Wilhelmshaven, Germany; [email protected] 4 Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity, University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), 26129 Oldenburg, Germany 5 GeoBio-Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany 6 SNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Palaeontology and Geology, 80333 Munich, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Marine sponges are the most prolific marine sources for discovery of novel bioactive compounds. Sponge secondary metabolites are sought-after for their potential in pharmaceutical applications, and in the past, they were also used as taxonomic markers alongside the difficult and homoplasy-prone sponge morphology for species delineation (chemotaxonomy). The understanding Citation: Galitz, A.; Nakao, Y.; of phylogenetic distribution and distinctiveness of metabolites to sponge lineages is pivotal to reveal Schupp, P.J.; Wörheide, G.; pathways and evolution of compound production in sponges. This benefits the discovery rate and Erpenbeck, D. A Soft Spot for yield of bioprospecting for novel marine natural products by identifying lineages with high potential Chemistry–Current Taxonomic and Evolutionary Implications of Sponge of being new sources of valuable sponge compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for a Revised Classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera) Christine Morrow1 and Paco Cárdenas2,3*
    Morrow and Cárdenas Frontiers in Zoology (2015) 12:7 DOI 10.1186/s12983-015-0099-8 DEBATE Open Access Proposal for a revised classification of the Demospongiae (Porifera) Christine Morrow1 and Paco Cárdenas2,3* Abstract Background: Demospongiae is the largest sponge class including 81% of all living sponges with nearly 7,000 species worldwide. Systema Porifera (2002) was the result of a large international collaboration to update the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on morphological data. Since then, an increasing number of molecular phylogenetic studies have considerably shaken this taxonomic framework, with numerous polyphyletic groups revealed or confirmed and new clades discovered. And yet, despite a few taxonomical changes, the overall framework of the Systema Porifera classification still stands and is used as it is by the scientific community. This has led to a widening phylogeny/classification gap which creates biases and inconsistencies for the many end-users of this classification and ultimately impedes our understanding of today’s marine ecosystems and evolutionary processes. In an attempt to bridge this phylogeny/classification gap, we propose to officially revise the higher taxa Demospongiae classification. Discussion: We propose a revision of the Demospongiae higher taxa classification, essentially based on molecular data of the last ten years. We recommend the use of three subclasses: Verongimorpha, Keratosa and Heteroscleromorpha. We retain seven (Agelasida, Chondrosiida, Dendroceratida, Dictyoceratida, Haplosclerida, Poecilosclerida, Verongiida) of the 13 orders from Systema Porifera. We recommend the abandonment of five order names (Hadromerida, Halichondrida, Halisarcida, lithistids, Verticillitida) and resurrect or upgrade six order names (Axinellida, Merliida, Spongillida, Sphaerocladina, Suberitida, Tetractinellida). Finally, we create seven new orders (Bubarida, Desmacellida, Polymastiida, Scopalinida, Clionaida, Tethyida, Trachycladida).
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivorous Sponges of the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans
    &DUQLYRURXVVSRQJHVRIWKH$WODQWLFDQG $UFWLF2FHDQV 3K\ORJHQ\WD[RQRP\GLVWULEXWLRQDQGPLFURELDODVVRFLDWLRQVRIWKH &ODGRUKL]LGDH 'HPRVSRQJLDH3RHFLORVFOHULGD -RQ7KRPDVVHQ+HVWHWXQ Dissertation for the degree of philosophiae doctor (PhD) at the University of Bergen 'LVVHUWDWLRQGDWH1RYHPEHUWK © Copyright Jon Thomassen Hestetun The material in this publication is protected by copyright law. Year: 2016 Title: Carnivorous sponges of the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans Phylogeny, taxonomy, distribution and microbial associations of the Cladorhizidae (Demospongiae, Poecilosclerida) Author: Jon Thomassen Hestetun Print: AiT Bjerch AS / University of Bergen 3 Scientific environment This PhD project was financed through a four-year PhD position at the University of Bergen, and the study was conducted at the Department of Biology, Marine biodiversity research group, and the Centre of Excellence (SFF) Centre for Geobiology at the University of Bergen. The work was additionally funded by grants from the Norwegian Biodiversity Centre (grant to H.T. Rapp, project number 70184219), the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters (grant to H.T. Rapp), the Research Council of Norway (through contract number 179560), the SponGES project through Horizon 2020, the European Union Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (grant agreement No 679849), the Meltzer Fund, and the Joint Fund for the Advancement of Biological Research at the University of Bergen. 4 5 Acknowledgements I have, initially through my master’s thesis and now during these four years of my PhD, in all been involved with carnivorous sponges for some six years. Trying to look back and somehow summarizing my experience with this work a certain realization springs to mind: It took some time before I understood my luck. My first in-depth exposure to sponges was in undergraduate zoology, and I especially remember watching “The Shape of Life”, an American PBS-produced documentary series focusing on the different animal phyla, with an enthusiastic Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemistry of Marine Sponges∗ 4 Sherif S
    The Chemistry of Marine Sponges∗ 4 Sherif S. Ebada and Peter Proksch Contents 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................ 192 4.2 Alkaloids .................................................................................. 193 4.2.1 Manzamine Alkaloids ............................................................. 193 4.2.2 Bromopyrrole Alkaloids .......................................................... 196 4.2.3 Bromotyrosine Derivatives ....................................................... 208 4.3 Peptides .................................................................................... 217 4.4 Terpenes ................................................................................... 240 4.4.1 Sesterterpenes (C25)............................................................... 241 4.4.2 Triterpenes (C30).................................................................. 250 4.5 Concluding Remarks ...................................................................... 268 4.6 Study Questions ........................................................................... 269 References ....................................................................................... 270 Abstract Marine sponges continue to attract wide attention from marine natural product chemists and pharmacologists alike due to their remarkable diversity of bioac- tive compounds. Since the early days of marine natural products research in ∗The section on sponge-derived “terpenes” is from a review article published
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Rhabdastrella Distincta (Thiele, 1900)
    Revision of Rhabdastrella distincta (Thiele, 1900) A re-description of the holotype and description of two recently re-collected specimens Anne Twaalfhoven (10149996) Biology BSc Thesis, July 2016 University of Amsterdam: dr. P. (Peter) Roessingh, [email protected] Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden: dr. N.J. (Nicole) de Voogd, [email protected] Abstract Sponge taxonomy is largely founded upon outdated descriptions originating from pre-modern times. Luckily, the material that these descriptions are based upon is often still available in Natural History Collections. In this article two sponge samples collected in 2009 from Ternate, Indonesia are compared to the type material of Rhabdastrella distincta. The holotype was described in 1896 by Thiele (1900). This article reviews the material for the first time ever since. The two recently collected samples are the first records of the species since its description. Descriptions of all three samples are based upon external morphology, skeletal structure, spicule measurements and spicule analysis by electron microscopy. It is revealed that, contrary to previous descriptions, the spherasters of R. distincta are stubbed with spines. Consequently, it is argued that the relation of R. distincta to its fellow species should be reconsidered. Euasters of R. distincta POR 5341 Twaalfhoven, July 2016, UvA Introduction When researching environmental change and biodiversity, Natural History Collections (NHC’s) can be of high value. Former taxonomists collected and described large collections of specimens that now serve as the foundation of our current knowledge on marine biodiversity (Jackson, 2001; Hooper & van Soest, 2002; Hoeksema et al, 2011). For reef systems, systematic ecological observations and methodological sampling started no earlier than the 1930’s (Jackson, 2001), and most recent surveys only encompass relatively short timespans (Jackson, 2001; van der Meij et al., 2010; Lister, 2011; Hoeksema et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetics Suggests a New Classification and Uncovers Convergent Evolution of Lithistid Demosponges
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Deceptive Desmas: Molecular Phylogenetics Suggests a New Classification and Uncovers Convergent Evolution of Lithistid Demosponges Astrid Schuster1,2, Dirk Erpenbeck1,3, Andrzej Pisera4, John Hooper5,6, Monika Bryce5,7, Jane Fromont7, Gert Wo¨ rheide1,2,3* 1. Department of Earth- & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology and Geobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians- Universita¨tMu¨nchen, Richard-Wagner Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany, 2. SNSB – Bavarian State Collections OPEN ACCESS of Palaeontology and Geology, Richard-Wagner Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany, 3. GeoBio-CenterLMU, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita¨t Mu¨nchen, Richard-Wagner Str. 10, 80333 Munich, Germany, 4. Institute of Citation: Schuster A, Erpenbeck D, Pisera A, Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland, 5. Queensland Hooper J, Bryce M, et al. (2015) Deceptive Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia, 6. Eskitis Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith Desmas: Molecular Phylogenetics Suggests a New Classification and Uncovers Convergent Evolution University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia, 7. Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum, of Lithistid Demosponges. PLoS ONE 10(1): Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia, 6986, Australia e116038. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0116038 *[email protected] Editor: Mikhail V. Matz, University of Texas, United States of America Received: July 3, 2014 Accepted: November 30, 2014 Abstract Published: January 7, 2015 Reconciling the fossil record with molecular phylogenies to enhance the Copyright: ß 2015 Schuster et al. This is an understanding of animal evolution is a challenging task, especially for taxa with a open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which mostly poor fossil record, such as sponges (Porifera).
    [Show full text]
  • 10-15 September 2018 Station Marine D'endoume, Marseille
    4th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON TAXONOMY OF ATLANTO-MEDITERRANEAN DEEP-SEA & CAVE SPONGES 10-15 September 2018 Station Marine d’Endoume, Marseille 4th International Workshop on Taxonomy of Atlanto-Mediterranean Deep-Sea & Cave Sponges 2018 Cuban Mesophotic Reef Sponges: Challenges, Novelties, and Opportunities – Part II: Demospongiae, Homosclerophorida, and Calcarea Diversity. María Cristina Díaz1, Shirley A. Pomponi1, María R. García–Hernández2 & Linnet Busutil3 1 Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute–Florida Atlantic University, Fort Pierce, Florida, USA 2 Centro Nacional de Áreas Protegidas, Playa, La Habana, Cuba 3 Instituto de Ciencias del Mar, Departamento de Biología, Playa, La Habana, Cuba A joint Cuba-U.S. research cruise was conducted from May 14 to June 12, 2017 to survey deep mesophotic reefs of Cuba during 42 dives at 35 unique sites. Two hundred and ninety six morphospecies have been distinguished after interpretation of field observations and photographs, with only six species assigned to Calcarea, six as Homoscleromorpha, and 286 to Demospongia. 115 morphospecies have been recognized to a species level (39%) while the rest (61%) have received either a generic or higher taxa assignations. Here we will present the most conspicuous species identified within Demospongiae subclasses Verongimorpha (24 morphospecies of the order Verongiida, two Chondrillida and one Chondrosida), Keratosa (13 Dictyoceratida and one Dendroceratida), the Heteroscleromorpha orders: Agelasida (23 spp.), Axinellida (10 spp), Poecilosclerida (9 spp.), Clionaida (8 spp.), Tetractinellida (17 spp.) Suberitida (4 spp.), Scopalinida (3 spp.), Polymastiida (3 spp.), and the calcarean and homosclerophorida species encountered. Here we introduce a dozen of potential undescribed species from the mentioned orders. The challenges, advances and potential opportunities to advance in the understanding of Cuban and Caribbean sponge fauna is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Sponge (Porifera: Demospongiae) Liosina Paradoxa Thiele, 1899 from Sandspit Backwater Mangroves at Karachi Coast, Pakistan
    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 47 (06), June 2018, pp. 1296-1299 Marine Sponge (Porifera: Demospongiae) Liosina paradoxa Thiele, 1899 from Sandspit backwater mangroves at Karachi coast, Pakistan Hina Jabeen, Seema Shafique*, Zaib-un-Nisa Burhan & Pirzada Jamal Ahmed Siddiqui Centre of Excellence in Marine Biology, University of Karachi, Karachi-75270, Pakistan *[E.Mail: [email protected]] Received 22 August 2016 ; revised 07 December 2016 Marine sponge Liosina paradoxa was recently collected from pneumatophore of Avicennia marina at Sandspit backwater (66°54'25" E, 24°49'20" N), Karachi coast in May 2015. Identification of specimen was based on the structure of siliceous spicules scattered irregularly in mesohyl observed under light microscope and scanning electron microscope. Spicules are megascleres, entirely smooth, strongyle (length = 310-451 ± 59.65 µm, width = 5-8 ± 1.8 µm), microscleres absent. The result has been shown that the species is Liosina paradoxa (Family Dictyonellidae) first time reported from coastal area of Pakistan. [Keywords: Marine sponge; mangroves; Demospongiae; Bubarida; Dictyonellidae; Liosina paradoxa] Introduction derivatives16. Most species of Dictyonellidae found in Mangroves are salt tolerant vegetation that inhabits warm waters. The following ten genera have been tropical and sub-tropical coastal regions and are included in this family; Liosina, Acanthella, considered among the world’s most productive Rhaphoxya, Lipastrotethya, Tethyspira, Scopalina, ecosystems1, which provide food and shelter for a Dictyonella, Phakettia, Svenzea and Stylissa16,18,19. wide variety of organisms2. Fungi, algal (micro and Liosina is massive, encrusting sponge with muddy macro) communities and many other invertebrates appearance. Spicules may scatter irregularly near the (sponges, polychaetes, bryozoans, barnacles and surface in the form of bundles within spongin, mostly molluscs) are the most abundant epibionts of monactines and diactines13,14.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Marine Sponges of the Family Ancorinidae (Demospongiae: Astroporida) from Korea
    Two Marine Sponges of the Family Ancorinidae (Demospongiae: Astroporida) from Korea Eun Jung Shim1,* Chung Ja Sim2 1Natural History Museum of Hannam University, Daejeon 306-791, Korea 2Department of Biological Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Nano Technology, Hannam University, Daejeon 305-811, Korea ABSTRACT Two sponges, Stelletta subtilis (Sollas, 1886) and Stryphnus sollasi n. sp., were collected from depth of 24-30 m at Jeju-do Island and Chuja-do Island by SCUBA diving from July 2003 to June 2010. The new species Stryphnus sollasi n. sp is similar with Stryphnus niger Sollas, 1886 in the composition of spicules, however they differ in colour and spicule size. This new species has smaller oxeas and larger oxyasters than those of S. niger. This new species has two size categories of oxyaster but S. niger has one size category of oxyaster. The colour of S. sollasi n. sp is white, but the latter puce black. Stelletta subtilis (Sollas, 1886) is first recorded in Korean fauna. Keywords: Stelletta, Stryphnus, Ancorinidae, new species, Korea Running title: Two Ancorinid Sponges from Korea * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 82-42-629-8455 Fax: 82-42-629-8280 E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The genera Stelletta Schmidt, 1862 and Stryphnus Sollas, 1886 are contained in the family Ancorinidae. This family is characterized by the long-rhabdome triaenes and oxeas as megascleres and euasters, sanidasters or microrhabds as microscleres. The genus Stelletta is characterized by presence of long-shafted triaenes as megascleres and euasters without marked centrum as microscleres. Twelve Stelletta species have been reported in Korean waters so far (Shim and Sim, 2009).
    [Show full text]