Monthly Report Global Water Partnership May 2014 Table Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monthly Report Global Water Partnership May 2014 Table Of Monthly Report Global Water Partnership May 2014 Table of contents NewsFlow June 2014.............................................................................................................................................. 2 GWP Global .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 GWP Regions ........................................................................................................................................................ 14 CARIBBEAN .............................................................................................................................................................. 14 CENTRAL AFRICA ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 CENTRAL AMERICA .................................................................................................................................................... 19 CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE .................................................................................................................................. 22 CENTRAL ASIA AND CAUCASUS .................................................................................................................................... 30 CHINA ..................................................................................................................................................................... 49 EASTERN AFRICA ....................................................................................................................................................... 50 MEDITERRANEAN ...................................................................................................................................................... 54 SOUTHERN AFRICA .................................................................................................................................................... 54 SOUTH AMERICA ....................................................................................................................................................... 59 SOUTH ASIA ............................................................................................................................................................. 60 SOUTHEAST ASIA .................................................................................................................................................... 102 WEST AFRICA ......................................................................................................................................................... 106 NewsFlow June 2014 Presidential Support for Water Goal GWP in Action 2013 “Water security is at the heart of our global development The GWP in Action 2013 Annual challenge,” said GWP’s new Patron, President Ellen Johnson Report for 2013 is now available. Sirleaf of Liberia, in a recorded message at Africa Water Week 2014 (AWW5) in Dakar, Senegal. Read more. (article already Read more. (article already published) published) The Liberian President expressed her support for a dedicated Water Goal in the post-2015 development agenda, stressing that this year is a crucial year to raise the issue of water around the world. President Sirleaf is co-chairing the joint GWP-OECD Global Dialogue project, which includes worldwide discussions on water. In her speech, the President brought up the recently completed national consultations on water, which were facilitated by GWP. She said the results from these demonstrate a very strong support for a water goal at country level. President Sirleaf was addressing the Water Ministers of 32 African countries in the opening session of the African Ministers Council on Water (AMCOW) General Assembly. Watch the President’s speech: (insert video link here) Strengthened Relationship with AMCOW GWP representatives attended many of the sessions of AWW5 and meetings were held with all five African GWP regions. The event also presented an opportunity to release the National Drought Management Policy Guidelines, which is the first knowledge product of the GWP/WMO Integrated Drought Management Programme (IDMP). Read more. (article already published) The main outcome for GWP was a further strengthening of the relationship with AMCOW. GWP has been included as lead partner in 7 out of 9 areas of implementation of AMCOW’s new work programme 2014-2016. GWP also had an exhibition booth at AWW5, which was well visited by participants for information and materials. GWP West Africa has a report on this. Promoting Water Security in the Limpopo River Basin GWP Southern Africa is undertaking work for the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) to package and disseminate research results of the CGIAR Challenge Programme for Water and Food (CPWF) undertaken in the Limpopo River Basin in 2009-2013. Read more. (article is published on GWP Southern Africa) Global Water Partnership (GWP), Global Secretariat, Drottninggatan 33, SE-111 51 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 (0)8 1213 8600, Fax: + 46 (0)8 1213 8604, e-mail: [email protected] The CPWF research in the Limpopo identified some interventions to help promote climate adaptation and water security within the Limpopo basin. In attempting to improve the water security challenges faced in Limpopo River Basin, an assessment of the socio-political, economic, institutional and market forces need to be carried out before any technologies aimed at improving agricultural productivity can be implemented. Providing incentives for the uptake of agricultural technologies. Livestock rearing is a common practice among small holder farmers but due to dry seasons and frequent droughts, the challenge is for farmers to ensure their livestock have enough feed to survive the drought season. Therefore, farmers are encouraged to grow fodder crops on part of their land. For those farmers who grow maize, they are encouraged to do crop rotation with velvet bean that helps to improve soil fertility and can also be used as livestock feed. For a new technology to be adopted, awareness and knowledge sharing should be facilitated. CPWF has created platforms that link farmers with input suppliers and value chain actors who can deliberate on challenges and opportunities for agricultural productivity and profitability. Poverty mapping was also carried out by CPWF to identify and locate poor areas and also provide information on social characteristics that hinder development. This move allows for the appropriate allocation of programs and interventions aimed at alleviating poverty and food insecurity. For successful intervention to be achieved, regional and national organisations must have a say in identifying research agendas. Aligning existing research agendas and research can allow researchers to use their findings to contribute to outcomes and impact. CPWF’s recognition of female farmers’ contribution to agricultural production has allowed for the engagement of agricultural extension workers to assist by initiating schemes that ease the domestic work load of women. This in turn gives female farmers ample time to work in their fields and enabling them to contribute to water security through agricultural production. Currently, GWP SA is strategizing and preparing the dissemination of the CPWF research outputs that were developed over the past 3 years. The knowledge products will be developed for end users and decision makers as a means of fostering regional ownership of project outputs and outcomes through partners national and regional dissemination events. These dissemination channels will contribute to the solution of improving governance and management of rain water in a bid to raise productivity, reduce poverty and improve livelihood adaptation in the Limpopo. A number of key organizations, such as the Limpopo Watercourse Commission (LIMCOM) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC) strongly supported CPWF’s approach in the Limpopo River basin, and both institutions are planning to incorporate CPWF findings into ongoing work. GWPSA will further engage with SADC, Waternet and NEPAD CoE as well as other strategic R4D partners (such as CCARDESA) on taking Research for Development forward in the region. 3 Read the Summary of the CPWF Research in the Limpopo River Basin over the past three years. GWP Consultations Reinforce Call for Dedicated Water Goal The conclusions of a second round of national stakeholder consultations on water urge the global community to include a dedicated water goal within the post-2015 sustainable development agenda. Read more. (article already published) Between February and April 2014, Global Water Partnership (GWP) brought together about 1,200 participants in 29 countries to discuss proposals for a water goal and related targets for the post-2015 development agenda. The most important conclusion was a broad consensus that the proposed goal of "Securing sustainable water for all" is fundamental to future development. In addition, there was strong support for targets that advance integrated approaches to water management, in particular the five targets proposed in the UN-Water Technical Advice paper. The second round of consultations indicated a clear preference for an approach vis-à-vis targets which allows flexibility for setting national targets (the "dashboard" approach), supported by clear definitions of terms and indicators. The consultations also addressed
Recommended publications
  • Achham, Banke, Chitwan, and Pachthar Districts
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 44168-012 Capacity Development Technical Assistance (CDTA) October 2013 Nepal: Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development (Financed by the Strategic Climate Fund) District Baseline Reports: Department of Roads (DOR) Achham, Banke, Chitwan, and Pachthar Districts Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | DoR District Baseline TA – 7984 NEP October, 2013 Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development 1 Main Consultancy Package (44768-012) ACHHAM DISTRICT BASELINE: DEPARTMENT OF ROADS (DOR) Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management METCON Consultants APTEC Consulting Prepared for Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Nepal Environment Natural Resources and Agriculture Department, South Asia Department, Asian Development Bank Version B i MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | DoR District Baseline TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ACHHAM DISTRICT ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 District Sector Master Plan ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Live Storage Capacities of Reservoirs As Per Data of : Large Dams/ Reservoirs/ Projects (Abstract)
    LIVE STORAGE CAPACITIES OF RESERVOIRS AS PER DATA OF : LARGE DAMS/ RESERVOIRS/ PROJECTS (ABSTRACT) Completed Under Construction Total No. of No. of No. of Live No. of Live No. of Live No. of State/ U.T. Resv (Live Resv (Live Resv (Live Storage Resv (Live Total No. of Storage Resv (Live Total No. of Storage Resv (Live Total No. of cap data cap data cap data capacity cap data Reservoirs capacity cap data Reservoirs capacity cap data Reservoirs not not not (BCM) available) (BCM) available) (BCM) available) available) available) available) Andaman & Nicobar 0.019 20 2 0.000 00 0 0.019 20 2 Arunachal Pradesh 0.000 10 1 0.241 32 5 0.241 42 6 Andhra Pradesh 28.716 251 62 313 7.061 29 16 45 35.777 280 78 358 Assam 0.012 14 5 0.547 20 2 0.559 34 7 Bihar 2.613 28 2 30 0.436 50 5 3.049 33 2 35 Chhattisgarh 6.736 245 3 248 0.877 17 0 17 7.613 262 3 265 Goa 0.290 50 5 0.000 00 0 0.290 50 5 Gujarat 18.355 616 1 617 8.179 82 1 83 26.534 698 2 700 Himachal 13.792 11 2 13 0.100 62 8 13.891 17 4 21 J&K 0.028 63 9 0.001 21 3 0.029 84 12 Jharkhand 2.436 47 3 50 6.039 31 2 33 8.475 78 5 83 Karnatka 31.896 234 0 234 0.736 14 0 14 32.632 248 0 248 Kerala 9.768 48 8 56 1.264 50 5 11.032 53 8 61 Maharashtra 37.358 1584 111 1695 10.736 169 19 188 48.094 1753 130 1883 Madhya Pradesh 33.075 851 53 904 1.695 40 1 41 34.770 891 54 945 Manipur 0.407 30 3 8.509 31 4 8.916 61 7 Meghalaya 0.479 51 6 0.007 11 2 0.486 62 8 Mizoram 0.000 00 0 0.663 10 1 0.663 10 1 Nagaland 1.220 10 1 0.000 00 0 1.220 10 1 Orissa 23.934 167 2 169 0.896 70 7 24.830 174 2 176 Punjab 2.402 14
    [Show full text]
  • GRMB Annual Report 2017-18
    Government of India Ministry of Water Resources, RD & GR Godavari River Management Board ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 GODAVARI BASIN – Dakshina Ganga Origin Brahmagiri near Trimbakeshwar, Nasik Dist., Maharashtra Geographical Area 9.50 % of Total GA of India Area & Location Latitude - 16°19’ to 22°34’ North Longitude – 73°24’ to 83° 4’ East Boundaries West: Western Ghats North: Satmala hills, the Ajanta range and the Mahadeo hills East: Eastern Ghats & the Bay of Bengal South: Balaghat & Mahadeo ranges stretching forth from eastern flank of the Western Ghats & the Anantgiri and other ranges of the hills and ridges separate the Gadavari basin from the Krishna basin. Catchment Area 3,12,812 Sq.km Length of the River 1465 km States Maharashtra (48.6%), Telangana (18.8%), Andhra Pradesh (4.5%), Chhattisgarh (10.9%), Madhya Pradesh (10.0%), Odisha (5.7%), Karnataka (1.4%) and Puducherry (Yanam) and emptying into Bay of Bengal Length in AP & TS 772 km Major Tributaries Pravara, Manjira, Manair – Right side of River Purna, Pranhita, Indravati, Sabari – Left side of River Sub- basins Twelve (G1- G12) Dams Gangapur Dam, Jayakwadi dam, Vishnupuri barrage, Ghatghar Dam, Upper Vaitarna reservoir, Sriram Sagar Dam, Dowleswaram Barrage. Hydro power stations Upper Indravati 600 MW Machkund 120 MW Balimela 510 MW Upper Sileru 240 MW Lower Sileru 460 MW Upper Kolab 320 MW Pench 160 MW Ghatghar pumped storage 250 MW Polavaram (under 960 MW construction) ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18 GODAVARI RIVER MANAGEMENT BOARD 5th Floor, Jalasoudha, Errum Manzil, Hyderabad- 500082 FROM CHAIRMAN’S DESK It gives me immense pleasure to present the Annual Report of Godavari River Management Board (GRMB) for the year 2017-18.
    [Show full text]
  • Achhame, Banke, Chitwan, Kathmandu, and Panchthar Districts
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 44168-012 Capacity Development Technical Assistance (CDTA) October 2013 Nepal: Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development (Financed by the Strategic Climate Fund) District Baseline Reports: Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads (DOLIDAR) Achhame, Banke, Chitwan, Kathmandu, and Panchthar Districts Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | DoLIDAR District Baseline TA – 7984 NEP October, 2013 Mainstreaming Climate Change Risk Management in Development 1 Main Consultancy Package (44768-012) ACHHAM DISTRICT BASELINE: DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT & AGRICULTURAL ROADS (DOLIDAR) Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management METCON Consultants APTEC Consulting Prepared for Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Nepal Environment Natural Resources and Agriculture Department, South Asia Department, Asian Development Bank Version B 1 MOSTE | Mainstreaming climate change risk management in development | DoLIDAR District Baseline TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 ACHHAM DISTRICT ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Study Report on "Comminity Based Organizations(Cbos): Landscape
    Community Based Organizations (CBOs): Landscape, Capacity Assessment and Strengthening Strategy Study Report Prepared for PLAN Nepal Lalitpur, Nepal July, 2005 Democratizing civil society at grassroots SAGUN P.O. Box 7802, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 977 4247920, Fax: 9771 4229544 Email: [email protected] Community Based Organizations (CBOs): Landscape, Capacity Assessment and Strengthening Strategy Mukta S. Lama Suresh Dhakal Lagan Rai Study Report Prepared for PLAN Nepal Lalitpur, Nepal July, 2005 SAGUN P.O. Box 7802, Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 977 4247920, Fax: 9771 4229544 Email: [email protected] ii Acknowledgements This report is a result of contribution of many people in multiple ways. Foremost, we extend our deepest and heartfelt gratitude to members of Community Based Organizations across the districts for sharing us with their time, insight and experiences. The study benefited greatly from support and cooperation of the Plan field staff and partner agencies in Sunsari, Morang, Makwanpur, Rautahat, Bara, and Banke districts and the Regional Operational Support Unit teams. We would like to thank Ms. Chhing Lamu Sherpa, Mr. Kalbhan Rai, Dr. Chandra K. Sen, Mr. R. P. Gupta and Krishna Ghimire for their valuable inputs on the study. Dr. Chandi Chapagai, Plan Nepal Country Training Coordinator deserves special thanks for coordinating the whole exercise. We would like to express our deep appreciation to Shobhakar Vaidhya for his keen interest, insightful comments and his enthusiasm for incorporating the learning into the institutional policies and procedures. Thanks are also due to the Ms. Minty Pande, Country Director for her encouragement and comments. Similarly we very much appreciate the support of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal's 9 Minimum Characteristics of a Disaster Resilient Community
    Flagship 4 Handbook Nepal’s 9 Minimum Characteristics of a Disaster Resilient Community Published July 2013 Flagship 4: Integrated Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction/Management Flagship 4 is led by Government of Nepal’s Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development in partnership with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Flagship 4 is part of the Nepal Risk Reduction Consortium. An electronic version of this handbook can be downloaded from www.flagship4.nrrc.org.np The handbook is available in both English and Nepali Copies of the handbook and other documents can be obtained from IFRC’s Flagship 4 coordinator i Nepal’s 9 Minimum Characteristics Nepal’s 9 Minimum Characteristics of a Disaster Resilient Community of a Disaster Resilient Community About This Handbook Glossary of Terms Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction / Management Since the inception of the 9 minimum Handbook contents CBDRR/M characteristics of a disaster resilient community CDMC Community Disaster Management Committee in Nepal, there have been many questions Case studies by Government, implementing agencies, One attempt to provide guidance on DDC District Development Committee researchers, and community members on how operationalising the characteristics has DDMC District Disaster Management Committee to operationalise these characteristics. These been to collect a number of case studies questions have led to the formation of this from implementing agencies in Nepal. DDRC District Disaster Response Committee handbook which contains more information Each case study corresponds to a specific DEECC District Energy, Environment and Climate Change Division about each characteristic and examples of how characteristic and outlines how the they can be applied in interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • To See Annual Report 2011-12
    C O N T E N T S I. About India Water Partnership (IWP) 1 II. Key Areas 1 III. Network Partners 1 IV. Mission 2 V. Objectives 2 VI. Board of Governors 3 VII. Host Institutions of IWP 3 VIII. IWP Office Bearers’ Representation in various Committees 3 IX. IWP Project Review Committee 3 X. Zonal Water Partnership Coordinators of IWP 4 XI. Activities Implemented by IWP during 2011-2012 4 XII. IWP Core Team 22 XIII. Audited Statement of Accounts for 2011-12 25 XIV. Acknowledgement 34 Annex-I : List of India Water Partnership Members 35 0 I. India Water Partnership (IWP) India Water Partnership (IWP) is a non-profit organization with a goal of promoting Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). IWP started as an informal body first under the Chairmanship of Prof. S R Hashim (the then Member, Planning Commission) (1997-98). Dr. Y K Alagh (former Union Minister of Power, Science & Technology, Government of India) was its next President. Shri Balasaheb Vikhe Patil (former Member of Parliament & Minister of Industries, Government of India) was the President during 2004-06. Thereafter, Prof. S R Hashim took over charge again in 2007 and continues to be its President. IWP became a legal entity on 28th November, 2001 with its Memorandum of Association registered in Haryana under the Society’s Registration Act of India. It is also accredited by the Global Water Partnership (GWP) headquartered at Stockholm, Sweden as one of its Country Water Partnerships and thus also known as (GWP-India). II. Key Areas IWP has been active in promotion of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) principles and practices to support national development priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources, River Development & Ganga Rejuvenation Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF JAL SHAKTI, DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, RIVER DEVELOPMENT & GANGA REJUVENATION LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. †919 ANSWERED ON 27.06.2019 OLDER DAMS †919. SHRI HARISH DWIVEDI Will the Minister of JAL SHAKTI be pleased to state: (a) the number and names of dams older than ten years across the country, State-wise; (b) whether the Government has conducted any study regarding safety of dams; and (c) if so, the outcome thereof? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR JAL SHAKTI & SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT (SHRI RATTAN LAL KATARIA) (a) As per the data related to large dams maintained by Central Water Commission (CWC), there are 4968 large dams in the country which are older than 10 years. The State-wise list of such dams is enclosed as Annexure-I. (b) to (c) Safety of dams rests primarily with dam owners which are generally State Governments, Central and State power generating PSUs, municipalities and private companies etc. In order to supplement the efforts of the State Governments, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Department of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation (DoWR,RD&GR) provides technical and financial assistance through various schemes and programmes such as Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Programme (DRIP). DRIP, a World Bank funded Project was started in April 2012 and is scheduled to be completed in June, 2020. The project has rehabilitation provision for 223 dams located in seven States, namely Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand. The objectives of DRIP are : (i) Rehabilitation and Improvement of dams and associated appurtenances (ii) Dam Safety Institutional Strengthening (iii) Project Management Further, Government of India constituted a National Committee on Dam Safety (NCDS) in 1987 under the chairmanship of Chairman, CWC and representatives from State Governments with the objective to oversee dam safety activities in the country and suggest improvements to bring dam safety practices in line with the latest state-of-art consistent with Indian conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the Role of Civil Society and Women in Democracy And
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM Monitoring and Evaluation Plan 25 November 2011 – 25 August 2016 (Cooperative Agreement No: AID-367-A-11-00003) Submitted to: UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT NEPAL MISSION Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Submitted by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal First approved on April 18, 2013 Updated and approved on January 5, 2015 Updated and approved on July 31, 2015 Updated and approved on August 31, 2015 Updated and approved on January 19, 2016 January 19, 2016 Ms. Judy Oglethorpe Chief of Party, Hariyo Ban Program WWF Nepal Baluwatar, Kathmandu Subject: Approval for revised M&E Plan for the Hariyo Ban Program Reference: Cooperative Agreement # 367-A-11-00003 Dear Judy, This letter is in response to the updated Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (M&E Plan) for the Hariyo Program that you submitted to me on January 14, 2016. I would like to thank WWF and all consortium partners (CARE, NTNC, and FECOFUN) for submitting the updated M&E Plan. The revised M&E Plan is consistent with the approved Annual Work Plan and the Program Description of the Cooperative Agreement (CA). This updated M&E has added/revised/updated targets to systematically align additional earthquake recovery funding added into the award through 8th modification of Hariyo Ban award to WWF to address very unexpected and burning issues, primarily in four Hariyo Ban program districts (Gorkha, Dhading, Rasuwa and Nuwakot) and partly in other districts, due to recent earthquake and associated climatic/environmental challenges. This updated M&E Plan, including its added/revised/updated indicators and targets, will have very good programmatic meaning for the program’s overall performance monitoring process in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft IEE: Nepal
    Draft Initial Environmental Examination September 2011 NEP: Integrated Urban Development Project- Nepalganj Municipality Prepared by the Government of Nepal, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 5 August 2011) Currency unit – Nepalese rupee (NRs/NRe) NRs1.00 = $0.01391 $1.00 = NRs 71.874 ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AIDS - Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome CITES - Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora DOR - Department of Roads DSC - Design and Supervision Consultants DSWSS - Department of Water Supply and Sewerage DUDBC - Department of Urban Development and Building Construction DWEC - District Wage Evaluation Committee EARF - Environmental Assessment and Review Framework EIA - Environmental Impact Assessments EIA - environmental impact assessment EMEP - Environmental Mitigation Execution Plan EMP - Environmental Management Plan EPA - Environment Protection Act EPR - Environment Protection Rules GRC - Grievance Redress Mechanism HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus IEE - Initial Environmental Examination MLD - Ministry of Local Development MOE - Ministry of Environment MOE - Ministry of Environment MOF - Ministry of Finance MPMC - Municipal Project Management Committee MPPW - Ministry of Physical Planning and Works NDWQS - National Drinking Water Quality Standards NGO - Non-Government Oranization NTFP - non-timber forest products NWSC - Nepal Water Supply Corporation OHS - Occupational Health and Safety PCO - project coordination
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Submitted to USAID So the Details of Those Activities Are Not Reported Here
    From Combatants to Peacemakers Program Project Final Report October, 2015 to March 31, 2017 Award No: AID-367-F-15-00002 Under USAID/DCHA/CMM APS-OAA-14-000003 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Democracy and Governance Office Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: +977-01-42340000 Submitted by: Forum for Protection of Public Interest (Pro Public) Gautambuddha Marg, Anamnagar P.O.Box: 14307 Telephone: +977-01-4268681, 4265023 Fax: +977-01-4268022 1 Disclaimer: All these activities were made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Pro Public and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. 2 Abbreviations BC Brahmin Chhetri CBO Community Based Organization CDO Chief District Officer CPN Communist Party of Nepal CSO Civil Society Organization DDC District Development Committee DF Dialogue facilitation ECs Ex-Combatants FGD Focus Group Discussion GESI Gender and Social Inclusion GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH KII Key Informant Interview LPC Local Peace Committee NC Nepali Congress NPTF Nepal Peace Trust Fund OCA Organizational Capacity Assessment OPI Organizational Performance Index PLA People Liberation Army Pro Public Forum for the Protection of Public Interest SDG Social Dialogue Group STPP Strengthening the Peace Process UCPN United Communist Party of Nepal UML United Marxist Leninist UNDP United Nations Development Program USAID United States Agency for International Development VDC Village Development Committee WCF Ward Citizen Forum 3 Acknowledgement This project completion report covers the overall implementation of the USAID-funded Combatants to Peacemakers (C2P) project (October 2015 to March 2017).
    [Show full text]