DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report ICMPD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report ICMPD GDISC MIGRATION AND CRIME WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON INTER -AGENCY COOPERATION FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR THE GDISC MIGRATION & CRIME CONFERENCE SOFIA , 18 – 20 JUNE 2008 Prevention of and Fight Against Crime 2007 With financial support from the Prevention of and Fight Against Crime Programme European Commission - Directorate-General Justice, Freedom And Security 1 I. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................8 II. METHODOLOGY AND STATE-OF-AFFAIRS...........................................................................8 1. MIGRATION, CRIME AND SECURITY.....................................................................................10 1.1. THE CONCEPT OF ‘MIGRATION AND CRIME ’............................................................................12 1.2. THE IMPACT OF SPECIFIC AREAS OF MIGRATION ON THE ISSUE OF ‘MIGRATION AND CRIME ’................................................................................................................................................13 1.3. CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................18 2. POLICIES AND MEASURES IN THE CONTEXT OF ‘MIGRATION AND CRIME............19 2.1. POLICIES ADDRESSING THE MIGRATION -CRIME NEXUS .......................................................19 2.1.1. Conclusions .................................................................................................................23 2.2. SPECIFIC MEASURES TO TACKLE IRREGULAR MIGRATION , TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS AND HUMAN SMUGGLING ..........................................................................................................................24 2.2.1. Conclusions .................................................................................................................25 2.3. PRE -FRONTIER MEASURES ......................................................................................................26 2.3.1. Visa requirements .....................................................................................................26 2.3.2. Risk profiles for certain migrant categories....................................................27 2.3.3. Pre-boarding documentation checks in countries of origin and transit countries ....................................................................................................................................28 2.3.4. Police cooperation with and Liaison Officers in countries of origin and transit countries ......................................................................................................................29 2.3.5. Conclusions ...............................................................................................................325 2.4. BORDER MANAGEMENT MEASURES ........................................................................................34 2.4.1. Increased border controls ......................................................................................34 2.4.2. Strengthened border control equipment ..........................................................35 2.4.3. Biometric data and enhanced security features for travel documents .38 2.4.4. Special training for border guards ......................................................................40 2.4.5. Conclusions .................................................................................................................42 2.5. POST -ENTRY MEASURES .....................................................................................................43 2.5.1. Internal identity controls ........................................................................................43 2.5.2. Workplace inspections .............................................................................................43 2.5.3. Welfare fraud control ...............................................................................................45 2.5.4. Controls directed at potential recruiters of victims of human trafficking and the issue of fake marriages .......................................................................................46 2.5.5. Conclusions .................................................................................................................47 2.6. INFORMATION GATHERING AND EXCHANGE MECHANISMS ..............................................48 2.6.1. Joint databases, standing information and consultation mechanisms at national level ............................................................................................................................48 2.6.2. Joint databases, standing information and consultation mechanisms at international level ..................................................................................................................53 2.6.3. Conclusions .................................................................................................................57 3. AGENCIES, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF ‘MIGRATION AND CRIME’ .......................................................................................................................................58 3.1. RESPONSIBILITIES ...................................................................................................................58 3.1.1. Police and immigration services ..........................................................................59 3.1.2. Border guards, customs and intelligence services .......................................61 3.2. CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................61 4. SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS AND GOOD PRACTICES OF INTER-AGENCY COOPERATION..................................................................................................................................62 4.1. SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR INTER -AGENCY COOPERATION IN PLACE FOR DEALING WITH THE CRIME ASPECTS INVOLVED IN MIGRATION ...............................................................................62 4.2. GOOD PRACTICES OF INTER -AGENCY COOPERATION ...........................................................64 2 4.2.1. At national level .........................................................................................................64 4.2.2. At international level ................................................................................................65 4.3. REASONS FOR THE SUCCESS OF GOOD PRACTICES .............................................................65 4.4. SPECIFIC PROBLEMS IN RELATION TO INTER -AGENCY COOPERATION ON A NATIONAL OR INTERNATIONAL LEVEL INVOLVING THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION IN RELATION TO ADDRESSING MIGRATION AND CRIME .............................................................................................66 4.5. USEFUL ASSISTANCE IN ADDRESSING ENCOUNTERED PROBLEMS .......................................66 4.6. CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................67 5. SPECIFIC PROCEDURES, PRACTICES OR ARRANGEMENTS IN PLACE FOR DEALING WITH VICTIMS OF TRAFFICKING IN HUMAN BEINGS .....................................68 5.1. IMMIGRATION PROCEDURES FOR THE NRM ..........................................................................68 5.2. LAW ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES FOR THE NRM .................................................................68 5.3. SPECIAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR MINORS ..................................................................................69 5.4. CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................70 6. OUTLOOK .......................................................................................................................................71 6.1. CHANGES PLANNED WITH REGARD TO THE ARRANGEMENTS IN THE AREA OF MIGRATION AND CRIME ........................................................................................................................................71 6.2. PERCEIVED MAIN CHALLENGES IN THE AREA OF MIGRATION AND CRIME AT THE DOMESTIC , EUROPEAN AND GLOBAL LEVELS ......................................................................................................72 6.2.1. At the domestic level ...............................................................................................73 6.2.2. At the European level ..............................................................................................73 6.2.3. At the global level .....................................................................................................74 6.3. ROLE OF THE GDISC NETWORK ............................................................................................74 6.3. CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................75 III. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................76 3 Preface The General Directors’ Immigration Services Conference (GDISC) network initiates, co-ordinates and improves practical co-operation between Immigration Services of its 33 Member States (The 27 EU Member States, Candidate Countries - Croatia, Turkey and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia -, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland). This year was the first time that the GDISC Network
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies
    Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies Editors Aditya Batara G Beni Sukadis Contributors Pierre Aepli Colonel Rudito A.A. Banyu Perwita, PhD Zoltán Nagy Lieutenant-Colonel János Hegedűs First Edition, June 2007 Layout Front Cover Lebanese-Israeli Borders Downloaded from: www.michaelcotten.com Printed by Copyright DCAF & LESPERSSI, 2007 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces FOREWORD Suripto, SH Vice Chairman of 3rd Commission, Indonesian House of Representatives And Chariman of Lesperssi Founder Board Border issues have been one of the largest areas of concern for Indonesia. Since becoming a sovereign state 61 years ago, Indonesia is still facing a series of territorial border problems. Up until today, Indonesia has reached agreements with its neighbouring countries related to demarcation and state border delineation. However, the lack of an unequivocal authority for border management has left serious implications for the state’s sovereignty and its citizen’s security. The Indonesian border of today, is still having to deal with border crime, which includes the violation of the territorial border, smuggling and terrorist infiltration, illegal fishing, illegal logging and Human Rights violations. These kinds of violations have also made a serious impact on the state’s sovereignty and citizen’s security. As of today, Indonesia still has an ‘un-settled’ sea territory, with regard to the rights of sovereignty (Additional Zone, Economic Exclusive Zone, and continent plate). This frequently provokes conflict between the authorised sea-territory officer on patrol and foreign ships or fishermen from neighbouring countries. One of the principal border problems is the Sipadan-Ligitan dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia, which started in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Aspects of Cooperation Between the State Border Guard of Latvia and Federal Security Service Border Guard Service of Russian Federation
    PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF COOPERATION BETWEEN THE STATE BORDER GUARD OF LATVIA AND FEDERAL SECURITY SERVICE BORDER GUARD SERVICE OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION Jekaterina Kuprijanova1, Juris Livdāns2 Iluta Arbidāne3 1 State Border Guard, Latvia, e-mail: [email protected] 2State Border Guard, Latvia, e-mail: [email protected] 3 Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Latvia, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. One of the main State Border Guard priorities is to maintain and develop the state border guarding system, according to the European Union external borders requirements, by fulfilling the conditions of the Schengen acquis. Schengen acquis provides that international cooperation in the field of border security can have multilateral, bilateral and local dimensions. In this context, an agreements concluded with bordering countries on cooperation in the field of border management is an effective tool to strengthen border security (EU Schengen Catalogue, 2002). In research as methodology are used scientific literature in the field of international law, treaties and agreements, the law of the Republic of Latvia, the State border guard of the internal regulations and the State border guard of unpublished materials. The Republic of Latvia and the Russian Federation cooperate in the field of development and implementation of coherent measures for the border control. Cooperation with RF is executed based on treaties and agreements concluded, as well, maintaining contacts between competent representatives of both countries at various management levels. The extensive cooperation between neighbouring countries on maintenance of security at the border results in the elucidation of the incidents occurring at the state border and other relevant issues, at the same time providing stability and security at the common border.
    [Show full text]
  • Anniversary Publication
    Ten Years of Europol 1999-2009 TEN YEARS OF EUROPOL, 1999-2009 Europol Corporate Communications P.O. Box 90850 2509 LW The Hague The Netherlands www.europol.europa.eu © European Police OfÞ ce, 2009 All rights reserved. Reproduction in any form or by any means is allowed only with the prior permission of Europol Editor: Agnieszka Biegaj Text: Andy Brown Photographs: Europol (Zoran Lesic, Bo Pallavicini, Max Schmits, Marcin Skowronek, Europol archives); EU Member States’ Law Enforcement Authorities; European Commission; European Council; Participants of the Europol Photo Competition 2009: Kristian Berlin, Devid Camerlynck, Janusz Gajdas, Jean-François Guiot, Lasse Iversen, Robert Kralj, Tomasz Kurczynski, Antte Lauhamaa, Florin Lazau, Andrzej Mitura, Peter Pobeska, Pawel Ostaszewski, Jorgen Steen, Georges Vandezande Special thanks to all the photographers, EU Member States’ Law Enforcement Authorities and Europol Liaison Bureaux for their contributions 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 7 I. Birth of an Idea, 1991-1998 11 1. Ideas behind Europol: Tackling International Crime 11 2. Maastricht Treaty: the ‘Founding Article’ 12 3. First Step: the Europol Drugs Unit 12 4. The Hague: a Fitting Location 13 5. Formal Status: the Europol Convention 14 6. European Union: New Members and a New Treaty 15 II. The First Years, 1999-2004 21 1. Facing the Challenges: Stabilisation and Consolidation 21 2. Changing Priorities, Flexible Organisation 24 3. Information Exchange and Intelligence Analysis: Core Business 27 4. The Hague Programme: Positioning Europol at the Centre of EU Law Enforcement Cooperation 34 5. Casting the Net Wider: Cooperation Agreements with Third States and Organisations 36 6. Europol’s Most Important Asset: the Staff and the ELO Network 37 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Line 2013, State Partnership Edition
    THE State Partnership Edition MarylandLINE Celebrating 20 Years with Estonia Celebrating 10 Years with Bosnia and Herzegovina OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF THE MARYLAND MILITARY DEPARTMENT Inside this issue: 8 6 9 12 10 LINE 18 22 16 20 Feature Stories Capt. Adolphus Houck makes his way across a northern Estonia waterfall during the Erna Raid 2007 competition in norther 14tests Soldiers’ skills and endurance over six grueling days of competition. 6 Maryland celebrates 12 4 Maryland Guard partners with LINE partnerships: Estonia & Bosnia and Herzegovina On The Bosnia and Herzegovina for peace, security 8 State of Maryland signs 10 Estonian Air Force pilots Memorandum with Estonia deploy with Maryland 9 Adjutant General Hosts Bosnian On the cover: National Guard Deputy Minister of Defense 12 Maryland Guard trains Maryland 16 The Forgotten Front Estonian Air Force pilots 13 Estonian Border Guard 20 Special Forces in Estonia Cross of Merit 24 State Partnership Program THE 22 Sabre Strike 2013 Governor: Contributors: Martin O’Malley Lt. Col. Charles Kohler 1st Lt. Kristofer Baumgartner Maj. Wade Minami A Maryland Army National Guard Sol- Adjutant General: dier sight opposing forces during the Capt. Joseph Winter Erna Raid 2007 military event in north- Maj. Gen. James A. Adkins Military Department 2nd Lt. Jessica Donnelly ern Estonia Aug. 9, 2007. Maryland National Guard Staff Sgt. Thaddeus Harrington Public Affairs Office Staff Sgt. John Higgins The Ambassador and BiH Minister Design & Layout: Fifth Regiment Armory Spc. Loni Kingston of Defense signed a Memorandum of 29th Division St. Understanding confirming continued Assembled from past Baltimore, Md. 21201 Spc Kieth Muckler (AF) Staff Sgt.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Smuggler States: Poland, Latvia, Estonia, and Contraband Trade Across the Soviet Frontier, 1919-1924
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SMUGGLER STATES: POLAND, LATVIA, ESTONIA, AND CONTRABAND TRADE ACROSS THE SOVIET FRONTIER, 1919-1924 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY ANDREY ALEXANDER SHLYAKHTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2020 Илюше Abstract Smuggler States: Poland, Latvia, Estonia, and Contraband Trade Across the Soviet Frontier, 1919-1924 What happens to an imperial economy after empire? How do economics, security, power, and ideology interact at the new state frontiers? Does trade always break down ideological barriers? The eastern borders of Poland, Latvia, and Estonia comprised much of the interwar Soviet state’s western frontier – the focus of Moscow’s revolutionary aspirations and security concerns. These young nations paid for their independence with the loss of the Imperial Russian market. Łódź, the “Polish Manchester,” had fashioned its textiles for Russian and Ukrainian consumers; Riga had been the Empire’s busiest commercial port; Tallinn had been one of the busiest – and Russians drank nine-tenths of the potato vodka distilled on Estonian estates. Eager to reclaim their traditional market, but stymied by the Soviet state monopoly on foreign trade and impatient with the slow grind of trade talks, these countries’ businessmen turned to the porous Soviet frontier. The dissertation reveals how, despite considerable misgivings, their governments actively abetted this traffic. The Polish and Baltic struggles to balance the heady profits of the “border trade” against a host of security concerns shaped everyday lives and government decisions on both sides of the Soviet frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Guide
    TRAVEL GUIDE Traces of the COLD WAR PERIOD The Countries around THE BALTIC SEA Johannes Bach Rasmussen 1 Traces of the Cold War Period: Military Installations and Towns, Prisons, Partisan Bunkers Travel Guide. Traces of the Cold War Period The Countries around the Baltic Sea TemaNord 2010:574 © Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen 2010 ISBN 978-92-893-2121-1 Print: Arco Grafisk A/S, Skive Layout: Eva Ahnoff, Morten Kjærgaard Maps and drawings: Arne Erik Larsen Copies: 1500 Printed on environmentally friendly paper. This publication can be ordered on www.norden.org/order. Other Nordic publications are available at www.norden.org/ publications Printed in Denmark T R 8 Y 1 K 6 S 1- AG NR. 54 The book is produced in cooperation between Øhavsmuseet and The Baltic Initiative and Network. Øhavsmuseet (The Archipelago Museum) Department Langelands Museum Jens Winthers Vej 12, 5900 Rudkøbing, Denmark. Phone: +45 63 51 63 00 E-mail: [email protected] The Baltic Initiative and Network Att. Johannes Bach Rasmussen Møllegade 20, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. Phone: +45 35 36 05 59. Mobile: +45 30 25 05 59 E-mail: [email protected] Top: The Museum of the Barricades of 1991, Riga, Latvia. From the Days of the Barricades in 1991 when people in the newly independent country tried to defend key institutions from attack from Soviet military and security forces. Middle: The Anna Akhmatova Museum, St. Petersburg, Russia. Handwritten bark book with Akhmatova’s lyrics. Made by a GULAG prisoner, wife of an executed “enemy of the people”. Bottom: The Museum of Genocide Victims, Vilnius, Lithuania.
    [Show full text]
  • 027694/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt Am 22/06/18
    027694/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt am 22/06/18 Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 June 2018 (OR. en) 14175/06 DCL 1 SCH-EVAL 151 FRONT 210 COMIX 854 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST14175/06 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED dated: 23 October 2006 new status: Public Subject: Schengen evaluation of the new Member States - ESTONIA: Report on Land Borders Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 14175/06 DCL 1 /dl DGF 2C EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 23 October 2006 THE EUROPEAN UNION 14175/06 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 151 FRONT 210 COMIX 854 REPORT from : the Schengen Evaluation Committee Land Borders to: the Schengen Evaluation Working Party Subject : Schengen evaluation of the new Member States - ESTONIA: Report on Land Borders 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 3 2. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 3 3. GENERAL INFORMATION..................................................................................................... 5 3.1. Strategy ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Organisational (functional) structure ................................................................................ 9 3.3. Operational effectiveness ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Report
    EUBORDERREGIONS FP7 RESEARCH PROJECT CASE STUDY #1 NORWAY - RUSSIA Case Study Report Elaborated by The Barents Institute Team UIT The Arctic University of Norway 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 The border, the border region and the border traffic zone ............................................................. 4 1.2 Data material and network analysis ................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Historical background ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 The impact of the past on current cross-border relations ............................................................. 10 1.5 Minorities and their impact on current cross-border relations ..................................................... 11 2. Socio-economic characteristics ................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Finnmark County ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Murmansk Region ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Regional indicators compared to national indicators ..................................................................... 16 2.4 Differences
    [Show full text]
  • 026797/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt Am 18/06/18
    026797/EU XXVI. GP Eingelangt am 18/06/18 Council of the European Union Brussels, 15 June 2018 (OR. en) 12754/1/06 REV 1 DCL 1 SCH-EVAL 137 FRONT 177 COMIX 749 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST12754/1/06 REV 1 RESTREINT UE/EU RESTRICTED dated: 19 October 2006 new status: Public Subject: Schengen evaluation of the new Member States - ESTONIA : report on Air Borders Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 12754/1/06 REV 1 DCL 1 /dl DGF 2C EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 October 2006 THE EUROPEAN UNION 12754/1/06 REV 1 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 137 FRONT 177 COMIX 749 REPORT from: Air Borders Evaluation Committee to: Schengen Evaluation Working Party Subject : Schengen evaluation of the new Member States - ESTONIA : report on Air Borders This report was drafted by the Air Borders Evaluation Committee and will be brought to the attention of the Sch-Eval Working Party, which will ensure a report and the presentation of the follow-up thereto to the Council. 12754/1/06 REV 1 AE/mdc 1 DG H RESTREINT UE EN www.parlament.gv.at RESTREINT UE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Management summary ............................................................................................................... 4 3. General information ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Estonia
    Adoption | Publication Public 7 December 2018 GrecoEval5Rep(2018)3 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT ESTONIA 7 Adopted by GRECO at its 81st Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 3-7 December 2018) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 6 III. CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................................. 7 IV. CORRUPTION PREVENTION IN CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS (TOP EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS) ......................... 9 SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND TOP EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS.............................................................................................. 9 Status and remuneration of persons with top executive functions ............................................................. 13 ANTICORRUPTION AND INTEGRITY POLICY, REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .................................................. 14 Legal framework/ethical principles and rules of conduct ............................................................................ 15 Institutional framework ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 20
    The IOM Moscow Times International Organization for Migration Moscow, Russia Issue 20, September, 2010 12, 2-aya Zvenigorodskaya, 123100, Moscow = Tel 7 (495) 797-87-22 = Fax 7 (495) 253-35-22 = [email protected], www.iom.int On August 2010 the IOM Moscow project team together with an invited international experts conducted a scheduled training INSIDE THIS ISSUE: workshops on Integrated Border Management in Kaliningrad (August, 13-14) and Nizhniy Novgorod (August 25-26). In Kaliningrad the workshop was attended by the staff of Regional Office, · Project “Enhancement of management of the Russian representatives of Rosgranitsa HQ and representative of the North- Federation border checkpoints”: Training workshops West Division of Rosgranitsa. In Nizhniy Novgorod it was attended by on integrated border management in Kaliningrad; the staff of Privolzhskiy Regional Office and its Public Council, Workshop on international experience in border Rosgranitsa Central Office personnel, representatives of Privolzhskiy management in Ekaterinburg; Study tour to Poland for Customs Department, representatives of Nizhniy Novgorod representatives of concerned agencies for International Airport and Truck Carriers Association in Privolzhskiy familiarization with best examples of solutions in Federal District. border management Both training sessions were in the series of training with the ultimate · Project “Development and implementation of a return goal of enhancing the Rosgranitsa personnel capacity. The main aim and reintegration assistance Programme for voluntary was to promote the understanding of the concept and practice of IBM returnees to the Chechen republic” among border management staff of the Regional offices of · Central Asia regional programme Rosgranitsa as well as to arrange exchange of different opinions and · Project “Combating trafficking in human beings in experience on the issues of border management, checkpoints the Russian Federation” (SIDA): administrating and functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • SCHENGEN EVALUATION PHS Forskning 2020: 1
    STEIN ULRICH - MARTIN NØKLEBERG - HELENE O. I. GUNDHUS SCHENGEN EVALUATION SchengenNemporiatur evaluation simusa is qui a mechanism omnimendi for STEIN ULRICH - MARTIN NØKLEBERG - HELENE O. I. GUNDHUS assessingquiae pa the verrorro compliance molupta with tusapisti Schengen rulesomnienis and regulations et litiunt byestet all participatingommolor countries.eperatio etThis eos report as cuscite provides mporit a brief SCHENGEN EVALUATION introductionut autet ad to maximil the origin et andquostisitas framework of ateSchengen aut hillese evaluation. diataquias Since dolori the first – AN EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE mechanismcomnis molleceseque was set upaut inharci 1998 aut all Schengenipis dolorrum countries quatas have remporibusbeen evaluated THE EXAMPLE OF NORWAY moreaut than ium once.doluptur audam etur ma Thecomnihit study looks fuga. at Itatur, Schengen ommolup evaluation tati- as istan hita educational ex eum voluptur experience. secupta The -aim wastion to analysecullabo. if evaluationXimolla quaectatur, has improved theeiumenet quality of erro service, mi,.Ihicias raised sequis the level et of professionalismoptatin velestem and libusant improved ullaborae educa - tionalvolendae activities consequ in the idempor police ehenisor border guardmaximusdant service of parit,a Schengen ide solorio state. min- Thecipi study tisciatur uses sin Norway cust adas euman example quo andtoribus argues qui that aut Schengen arcipid istotateevaluation es has hadsamenda a very positiveapid moloria effect spicien on how imu -the policesant in quiandic
    [Show full text]