DOCSLIB.ORG

15 July 2018 – Eighth Sunday After Pentecost 2 Samuel 6:1–5, 12B–19; Psalm 24; Ephesians 1:3–14; Mark 6:14–29 Leaders Before God

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
15 July 2018 – Eighth Sunday After Pentecost 2 Samuel 6:1–5, 12B–19; Psalm 24; Ephesians 1:3–14; Mark 6:14–29 Leaders Before God 15 July 2018 – Eighth Sunday after Pentecost 2 Samuel 6:1–5, 12b–19; Psalm 24; Ephesians 1:3–14; Mark 6:14–29 Leaders Before God When I meet with people, the topic of conversation invariably moves to world leadership – the type of people who are in power, their actions and personalities, even their life histories. Life hasn’t changed much from the 21st century AD to the 11th century BC (a period of 3,000 years). The people of the Old Testament and New Testament were just as interested in the exploits of their kings as we are in the lives of our civil leaders. In the 21st century we are aware of the life story of King David – from humble beginnings as a shepherd to the seat of power over the entire country. This was one of the first Bible stories we may have read in our children’s Bible. In the Old Testament, kings were expected to behave in a certain way, just as we have standards of behaviour for our civil leaders. When our leaders stray from those standards, the amount of talk about that leader increases significantly, especially in our news-addicted age. So it was with David. This morning we heard the story of how King David was bringing the Ark of the Covenant back to Jerusalem. The Ark of the Covenant contained the stone tablets with the original Ten Commandments which God gave Moses. The Jews believed God's presence resided within the Ark and they kept it veiled in skins and a blue cloth. This was the most sacred and holy object for the Jews and having the Ark come to reside in Jerusalem was a time for great rejoicing. People lined the route singing and praising God. King David was even dancing along the route. In the 19th and early 20th centuries of our era, some Christians considered dancing of any kind to be evil. But in the 11th century BC dancing in worship was considered a way to praise God and therefore not evil. So David's dancing was not a problem for the people of that time. The problem was his clothing – or rather, his lack of clothing. David was not dressed as a king while he was dancing – he was not wearing his regal robes. The story says he was wearing only an ephod. People of those days did not wear underwear as we know underwear. So David is wearing an apron-like garment – two straps over the shoulders that hung down leaving nothing to the imagination. The people didn’t seem to have a problem but his wife, Michal, was angry – very angry. In the next section of this chapter (which we did not hear this morning), Michal gives David, her husband, a piece of her mind. She tells him sarcastically, “How the king of Israel honoured himself today, uncovering himself today before the eyes of his servants’ maids, as any vulgar fellow might shamelessly uncover himself”. She finds his behaviour to be evil. Even today we're not that keen on seeing people half-naked (or even completely naked) – there are laws against it. In the 21st century we may allow 'clothing optional' beaches in British Columbia but people dancing naked – No. But David tells Michal that “before the Lord I will make myself even more contemptible”. David was humbling himself himself before God. He was not dancing as a king but as an ordinary subject of the supreme King. Michal does not see the spiritual significance of his action – her only concern is his status and how that makes her look bad before the people. However, David was showing by his actions that he did not consider himself equal to God (as some of our leaders today do) – his relationship with God was more important. On the other hand, we have King Herod Antipas, whom we heard about in the Gospel of Mark. However, he was a king with a different set of morals. His family relationships were complex – his second wife, Herodias, was not only his niece but also his sister-in-law. John the Baptist condemned Herod’s marriage to Herodias because of that close family relationship and because Herod Antipas had divorced his first wife to marry her. The result was that Herodias hated John the Baptist. She manipulated Herod into a situation in which he had to carry out an odious promise (the head of John the Baptist) to maintain his standing with the members of his court. When Salome, his step-daughter, pleased Herod, her step- father, with her dance, Herod promised her anything she wished. And he could not go back on that promise or he would lose face. Two kings, two wives and two dances. Two very different relationships before God. Two very different styles of leadership. One leader cares about a relationship with God, the other doesn’t even bring God into the equation. In comparing these kings it’s easy for us to make a judgement and say that this one is good and that one is bad. But we know a little more about King David. We know he too lusted – his lust was directed toward the wife of his neighbour and leader in his army. We know that King David arranged to have that neighbour killed so that he could marry the object of his lust. At that point, David’s actions were not those of a good leader. The difference between the two kings is that David admitted he was wrong. After being confronted by the prophet Nathan, David confessed to his crime and was given a punishment. How many leaders are willing to do that? Even church leaders have a hard time admitting that they are wrong. One of the amazing things about Pope Francis, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church, is that he did admit he had made a mistake in his judgement about the child abuse perpetrated by clergy in Chile. He worked to rectify his mistake. He humbled himself before God and before the world. It’s easy for us to look at our leaders and point out their fallibilities. It’s easy for us to be enraged by their faults, especially when their mistakes hurt so many people. But their mistakes and their damage take our attention away from our own mistakes and the damage we may have caused others. Yes, we need to hold our leaders to account. We need to pray for them that they will allow God to work on their hard hearts. But we ourselves also need to be humble before God to admit to those times when our hearts were hard and we did not have compassion, when our own desires took precedence over others’ needs. Two leaders, two wives, two dances and two different relationships with God. In small ways each one of us is a leader to a small group of people. God allows us the freedom to choose what kind of person each of us can be in our own sphere of life. May we be humble before God. May we have compassion for God’s people – regardless of their religion, or sexual orientation, or race. May we love as God loves us..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Περίληψη : Χρονολόγηση Γεωγραφικός Εντοπισμός Ionic Colonization
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Deger-Jalkotzy Segred (19/2/2004) Για παραπομπή : Deger-Jalkotzy Segred , "Ionic Colonization", 2004, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=4675> Ionic Colonization Περίληψη : According to the ancient sources, Ionia consisted of twelve cities founded by a Greek population who left mainland Greece. Several issues concerning the reasons, the chronology as well as the ethnic identity of the immigrants or colonists have arisen and they still remain the focal point of a persistent debate among scholars. Χρονολόγηση 11th century B.C. (?) Γεωγραφικός εντοπισμός Asia Minor 1. Ionic Colonization: the written testimony During historical times Greek Ionia consisted of the twelve cities of the Panionic league: Miletus, Myus, Priene, Ephesos, Colophon, Lebedos, Teos, Clazomenae, Erythrae, Phocaea, and the island-states of Samos and Chios. According to the ancient sources, these cities were founded in the course of a migration movement which had set off from Athens, and which was led by the sons of the Athenian king Codrus. The reason of the exodus was ascribed by the ancient authors to a fight between the sons of Codrus for the succession to the throne, in which Medon prevailed.1 1.1 Herodotus Three ancient authors have dealt with the Ionic Migration in detail. According to Herodotus2 the Ionians had originally inhabited twelve cities in the Peloponnesian region of Achaea.3 As soon as they were expelled by the Achaeans, they sought refuge in Athens. Their descendants emigrated to Asia Minor, where they founded twelve cities in remembrance of their earlier settlement in Achaea.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Bible Journey
    Bible Journey: 1 Samuel February 21/22, 2021 The Big Picture Deuteronomistic History 1 Samuel continues the Deuteronomistic History that started back in Joshua and Judges. We saw that Judges was episodic rather than a comprehensive history of that time. 1 Samuel picks up in that same time period of the judges. In his farewell address in 1 Samuel 12, Samuel even summarizes the main part of the book of Judges. For more information about the author and date of composition, refer back to what we discussed the first week with the Deuteronomistic History. As with Joshua and Judges, some of the material here may be earlier sources that were pulled together into this final form of the narrative. So, some people attribute authorship to Samuel for some of this material, but clearly he didn’t write the portions that came after his death. Also, keep in mind that this is a collection of sources, brought together into this final form, rather than a single narrative composed from beginning to end by one person. This may help to explain some of the repetitions in the text, or the fact that some materials are placed together in a more thematic way rather than in a strictly linear narrative. The fact that these books went through at least a final edit during the time of the exile continues to color the themes of which accounts are preserved here and how they are told and interpreted. Transition from judges to the monarchy The final chapters of Judges repeatedly commented on the fact that there was no monarchy in Israel, during the time when things were spiraling out of control.
    [Show full text]
  • SEA PEOPLES” and CANAAN in TRANSITION C
    “SEA PEOPLES” AND CANAAN IN TRANSITION c. 1200-950 B.C. The Levant underwent significant changes and transformations between 1200 and 950 B.C., a period which corresponds to the end of the Late Bronze Age and to Iron Age I. The Bronze Age Canaanite and North-Syrian city-state system was then replaced by an ethno-political structure in which the various regions of the Levant were inhabited by different peoples. This change was accompanied by the collapse of the Hittite empire, by a considerable shrinking of the Assyrian power basis, and by the evanescence of the Egyptian control in Syro-Phoenicia and in Canaan, with concomitant and widespread destructions of the urban cen- tres. The consequence was the abrupt and of historical records provided by the cuneiform archives of Hattusha, Emar, and Ugarit, which were not replaced by a sufficient amount of reliable indigenous sources. Only a few inscriptions, especially from Byblos, and some passages hypo- thetically distinguishable in the biblical accounts can be considered as historical sources related to this period. This lack of indigenous docu- ments is by no means filled by the rare external references in Egypt and in Assyria, although one cannot neglect the “Israel Stela” of Merneptah, the Medinet Habu inscriptions and reliefs, which describe the wars of Ramses III against the “Sea Peoples” in his 8th year, the statement in Papyrus Harris I, that Ramses III settled his defeated foes in his strong- holds, the Tale of Wen Amon and the Onomasticon of Amenope, two literary works from the 11th century B.C., as well as the annals of Tiglath-pileser I (1114-1076 B.C.).
    [Show full text]
  • POMEGRANATE (PUNICA GRANATUM L.) from MOTYA and ITS DEEPEST ORIENTAL ROOTS Lorenzo Nigro
    [Vicino Oriente XXII (2018), pp. 49-90] POMEGRANATE (PUNICA GRANATUM L.) FROM MOTYA AND ITS DEEPEST ORIENTAL ROOTS Lorenzo Nigro - Federica Spagnoli Sapienza University of Rome The pomegranate bush raises its voice - tiny, insistent, and shrill: My seeds shine like the teeth of my mistress, the shape of my fruit is round like her breasts. I’m her favorite, I know, sweetest tree in the orchard, looking my best through every season.1 ὣς φάτο: γήθησεν δὲ περίφρων Περσεφόνεια, καρπαλίμως δ᾽ ἀνόρουσ᾽ ὑπὸ χάρματος: αὐτὰρ ὅ γ᾽ αὐτὸς ῥοιῆς κόκκον ἔδωκε φαγεῖν μελιηδέα λάθρῃ, ἀμφὶ ἓ νωμήσας, ἵνα μὴ μένοι ἤματα πάντα αὖθι παρ᾽ αἰδοίῃ Δημήτερι κυανοπέπλῳ.2 Pomegranate remains and representations found in the Phoenician site of Motya in Western Sicily give the cue for a summary study of this plant and its fortune in the Near East and the Mediterranean. Fruits offered in wells, a terracotta relief depicting a pomegranate held by a goddess found in the Sacred Area of the Kothon at Motya, and, especially, a pottery vase in the shape of a pomegranate retrieved inside the Temple of Astarte in the same compound, witness the symbolic transcultural role of this fruit and of the pomegranate tree in ancient Mediterranean, from its farthest oriental origins to modern art and religion. Keywords: pomegranate; Punica granatum L.; Motya; Astarte; Demetra 1. POMEGRANATE: THE DIVINE POME [LN] Pomegranate is a divine gift in the imagery of antiquity. It has so many evocative features: its blossom and flower, the squatted fat spherical shape of the pome, with a pointed or crowned tip (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 127567796.23.Pdf
    ■ $)r JU'CniUcI)1* (Eburatianal IDorks, PUBLISHED BT '» ; OriVER & BOYD, EDINBURGH; i SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, A CO., LONDON; AND SOLD BY*“) ALL BOOKSELLERS. ' A valuable Series of Works has been prepared by Dn ; S! M'Culloch,Edinburgh, andformerly now MinisterHead-master of the of Westthe Circus-Place Church, Greenock, School, :■ |; businessfor the useto instructof Seminaries his pupils where in the the meaning preceptor of whatmakes is itread, his ; j1 as well as in the art of reading. This series will be found to ! j l .gradationsserve the double to the pronunciationpurpose of introducing of the English the scholar language, by easyand ; ! jr ancle»erciseof providing hishim opening with a faculties. kind of reading adapted to interest : ; In trie introductory Books, the lessons are arranged on the j j ;; soundsprinciple before of familiarizing embarrassing the him pupil with varietieswith the andmore anomalies common ; «| jjj: ! gradualso that heorder may of bo development taught the suitedlaws ofto hisEnglish tender Orthoepy capacity. in a ■! !|c: lint Rcatiittg-pook, ; 18mo, 24 pages, price lid. in stiff wrapper. 13th Edition. i |: lessonsThis onlittle the manual long and contains short sounds the Alphabet, of the vowels and progressive ; no moro J; |i thesebeing sounds,attempted and in with it than the merelyprimitive to familiarizesounds of the the consonants. pupil with ; Scronii Rcatiing-|0oh, J l8mo, 48 pages, price 3d. in stiff wrapper. 13th Edition. J \; of Thisdouble book consonants contains progressiveand diphthongs, lessons and on on the the pronunciation middle and J! I! considerablebroad sounds number of the vowels. of new sounds,The pupil and is hereto those introduced consonants to a ;; ;; havinghis entering two different on the Thiud sounds, Reading-Book.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil As a Lubricant in the Ancient Middle East
    Tribology Online, 2, 2 (2007) 44-49. ISSN 1881-2198 DOI 10.2474/trol.2.44 Oil as a Lubricant in the Ancient Middle East Michael Nosonovsky National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8520, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA [email protected] ( Manuscript received 12 January 2007; accepted 8 March 2007; published 15 April 2007 ) There is a significant interest toward the history of tribology in both engineering and historical communities. However, there is a gap between engineers and historians in their approach to the topic, and existing literature sometimes overlooks various cultural influences, in particular, oriental ones, which affected the tribological science and technology. We consider the early history of lubrication and show that while the evidences of usage of lubricants (water, gypsum, and animal fats) in Ancient Egypt in 2nd-3rd millennia BC are hypothetic, rather than established facts, the Hebrew Bible contains earliest records of using oil as a lubricant. In particular, the account of rubbing the shield of King Saul (11th century BC) is discussed as well as other similar cases. These findings allow us to better understand the universal nature of history of science and technology as a multicultural phenomenon. Keywords: history of lubrication, olive oil, gypsum, ancient Middle East artefact, including coatings, sledge surfaces etc. and 1. Introduction investigation of ancient technology used to create them7,8). Although the words “tribophisics/tribology” were Because of this interest toward the history of the coined only some 60 years ago by D. Tabor and H.P. tribology both in the engineering and historical Jost from the Greek word tribos, meaning “rubbing”, scientific communities, a number of publications have tribological knowledge and technology existed from the 1) appeared in the past years, reporting and reviewing earliest time .
    [Show full text]
  • Philistine State Or Neo-Hittite Kingdom?
    Emanuel, Jeffrey P. King Taita and his “Palistin”: philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom? Antiguo Oriente: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente Vol. 13, 2015 Este documento está disponible en la Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina, repositorio institucional desarrollado por la Biblioteca Central “San Benito Abad”. Su objetivo es difundir y preservar la producción intelectual de la Institución. La Biblioteca posee la autorización del autor para su divulgación en línea. Cómo citar el documento: Emanuel, Jeffrey P. “King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?” [en línea], Antiguo Oriente : Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente 13 (2015). Disponible en: http://bibliotecadigital.uca.edu.ar/repositorio/revistas/king-taita-palistin-emanuel.pdf [Fecha de consulta:..........] . 01 Emanuel King Taita_Antiguo Oriente 27/06/2016 12:40 p.m. Página 11 KING TAITA AND HIS “PALISTIN”: PHILISTINE STATE OR NEO-HITTITE KINGDOM?* JEFFREY P. EMANUEL [email protected] Center for Hellenic Studies Harvard University Cambridge, USA Summary: King Taita and His “Palistin”: Philistine State or Neo-Hittite Kingdom? The end of the Hittite Empire and the destruction and abandonment of Alalakh repre- sents a cultural break between the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages in the ‘Amuq Valley. In the Iron I, a population with clear ties to the greater Aegean world, perhaps related to the Philistines of southern Canaan, established an agro-pastoral settlement at Tell Ta‘yinat and the surrounding area. This occupation, marked by Field Phases 6–3 at Ta‘yinat, was both materially and chronologically ephemeral, and should be viewed as a cultural outlier sandwiched between the Hittite-controlled LBA and later Iron I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Calendar
    Here is the ninth legend. This is about the Chinese Calendar. Can you find out more about it? Can you find different versions of this legend? The Chinese Calendar The traditional Chinese calendar has been used for centuries by farmers to tell them when to plant and when to harvest. It also continues to define the dates of festivals and is used for horoscopes in China. This calendar has a very long history going back to the Xia (21st century BC - 16th century BC) and Shang Dynasty (16th century BC - 11th century BC). It is based on a unique combination of astronomy and geography through observation and exploration. It is also referred to as the Lunar Calendar, Yin calendar, Xia calendar or the old Chinese calendar. A lunar month is the time between one full moon and the next, approximately twenty-eight days during which the moon orbits the earth. The lunar year consists of thirteen months of twenty-eight days each. This means that the Chinese New Year falls on varying dates between the latter part of January and early February. According to the Lunar Calendar, a new month begins when the moon moves into line with the earth and the sun. This is called 'Chu Yi' or 'Shuo Ri' (the first day of a lunar month). The year was divided into in 24 equal parts, each forming the 24 solar terms. The month with its first day nearest the Beginning of Spring (the first solar term) is the first lunar month. This varies between January 20th and February 20th.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Dautais 2020. “Review Of: Peter M. Fischer and Teresa Bürge (Eds) 2017. Sea Peoples Up-To-Date. New Research on Transfo
    Louis Dautais 2020. “Review of: Peter M. Fischer and Teresa Bürge (eds) 2017. Sea Peoples Up-to-Date. New Research on Transformations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the 13th-11th Centuries BCE (Proceedings of the ESFWorkshop held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 3-4 Nov. 2014)”, published in Journal of Greek Archaeology Vol. 5, pp. 585-591. Peter M. Fischer and Teresa Bürge (eds.). Sea Peoples Up-to-Date. New Research on Transformations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the 13th-11th Centuries BCE (Proceedings of the ESF-Workshop held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 3-4 November 2014). Denkschriften der Gesamtakademie 81; Contributions to the Chronology of the Eastern Mediterranean 35. pp. 412, figs. 92. 2017. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. ISBN 978-3-7001-7963-4 paperback €149; e-publication €109. This volume is the outcome of an international workshop held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna in November 2014. Since the first use of the term “Sea Peoples” (« Peuples de la Mer ») in 1867 by French Egyptologist Emmanuel de Rougé,1 the topic has not lost its popularity, with plenty of attention in recent years, including now published workshops at Louvain-la-Neuve (in 2014)2 and Warsaw (in 2016).3 The present volume wanted to go beyond the information provided by the texts and aimed at presenting new archaeological data and their analysis, covering a wider geographical region and implying a more holistic approach than ever before. As the subtitle indicates, the specific aim of the volume is to study the various political, economic, social and cultural transformations in the Eastern Mediterranean from the 13th to 11th centuries BC4 that can be connected to the Sea Peoples phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Saul Old Testament Facts
    Saul Old Testament Facts Irrecusably contiguous, Hurley enervating keratitis and relay manse. Which Bjorne paik so punily that Lon upbuild her ascendances? Deane remains khedival after Raynor psychs dreamlessly or decussates any year-ends. See proof either have been out of man from the king of the church of old saul was By Redlands Daily Facts redlandsdfmdevcom July 7 2010 at 1200 am lord all recognize the scoundrels in the Bible one fan my favorites for sheer political. Absalom began to kill david crept up to his glory appears as seen weaker people out for saul old testament facts. King Saul A re-examination of another reign to its effects on. Israel and moses did just a saul old testament facts. You ads to the saul old testament facts i needed an affair with facts audio programming whenever you are not wealthy rancher in drawing the. Because four people made return of David's single victory than view of Saul's the king went into street rage and became mayor of David From every moment he plotted to kill me Instead for building up Israel King Saul wasted most from his time chasing David through the hills. This would die, saul old testament facts. Beth Shean in the Bible and Archaeology Biblical. Saul of Tarsus Condensed Biblical Encyclopedia Scripture facts on Saul of Tarsus Free online bible encyclopedia for surveillance of verses and characters. The gut probably more interpretive than factual indicates belief be the. Cathy and sent word of facts about himself up saul old testament facts stated, i believe that he saw samuel told national fund warehouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11Th Edition, by Various 1
    Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, by Various 1 Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, by Various The Project Gutenberg EBook of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Volume 9, Slice 6, by Various This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Volume 9, Slice 6 "English Language" to "Epsom Salts" Author: Various Release Date: February 17, 2011 [EBook #35306] Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA *** Produced by Marius Masi, Don Kretz and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net Transcriber's notes: (1) Numbers following letters (without space) like C2 were originally printed in subscript. Letter subscripts are preceded by an underscore, like Cn. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, by Various 2 (2) Characters following a carat (^) were printed in superscript. (3) Side-notes were relocated to function as titles of their respective paragraphs. (4) Macrons and breves above letters and dots below letters were not inserted. (5) Small and capital EZH letters are subtituted with [gh] and [Gh] respectively. Thorn is subtituted with th or Th, and eth is subtituted with dh. (6) [root] stands for the root symbol; [alpha], [beta], etc. for greek letters. (7) The following typographical errors have been corrected: ARTICLE ENGLISH LANGUAGE: "The writers of each district wrote in the dialect familiar to them; and between extreme forms the difference was so great as to amount to unintelligibility ..." 'familiar' amended from 'familar'.
    [Show full text]
  • Telling Stories: the Mycenaean Origins of the Philistines
    GUY D. MIDDLETON TELLING STORIES: THE MYCENAEAN ORIGINS OF THE PHILISTINES Summary. The story of the Philistines as Mycenaean or Aegean migrants, refugees who fled the Aegean after the collapse of the palace societies c.1200 BC, bringing an Aegean culture and practices to the Eastern Mediterranean, is well known. Accepted as essentially true by some, yet rejected as little more than a modern myth by others, the migration narrative retains a central place in the archaeology and historiography of the Eastern Mediterranean in the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age (LBA/EIA). In recent years, and despite an increasingly shaky theoretical basis, the migration hypothesis has nevertheless seemed to drown out other interpretations and characterizations of the period, claiming a normative position that is undeserved. In this paper I explore the continuing power of this nineteenth century narrative and seek to show why it is less convincing than its prominent status would suggest. INTRODUCTION Dalglish (2005, 148–9) has defined historical myths as ‘narratives which have a basis in history, but which have been embellished and over-emphasised to the extent that they reduce history to a limited series of caricatures and stereotypes’. One such enduring myth is that of an ‘Aegean’, usually meaning ‘Mycenaean’, migration to Canaan at the end of the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age c.1200 BC, which serves for many as an explanation of the origin of the Philistines (Dothan 1982; Dothan and Dothan 1992; Stager 1995). This is part of the larger story of a supposed migration of the ‘Sea Peoples’. As Stone wrote, ‘the origins of the Sea Peoples’ culture lie in Mycenaean Greece’ (Stone 1995, 13).
    [Show full text]