1 Bible Journey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Bible Journey Bible Journey: 1 Samuel February 21/22, 2021 The Big Picture Deuteronomistic History 1 Samuel continues the Deuteronomistic History that started back in Joshua and Judges. We saw that Judges was episodic rather than a comprehensive history of that time. 1 Samuel picks up in that same time period of the judges. In his farewell address in 1 Samuel 12, Samuel even summarizes the main part of the book of Judges. For more information about the author and date of composition, refer back to what we discussed the first week with the Deuteronomistic History. As with Joshua and Judges, some of the material here may be earlier sources that were pulled together into this final form of the narrative. So, some people attribute authorship to Samuel for some of this material, but clearly he didn’t write the portions that came after his death. Also, keep in mind that this is a collection of sources, brought together into this final form, rather than a single narrative composed from beginning to end by one person. This may help to explain some of the repetitions in the text, or the fact that some materials are placed together in a more thematic way rather than in a strictly linear narrative. The fact that these books went through at least a final edit during the time of the exile continues to color the themes of which accounts are preserved here and how they are told and interpreted. Transition from judges to the monarchy The final chapters of Judges repeatedly commented on the fact that there was no monarchy in Israel, during the time when things were spiraling out of control. As 1 Samuel opens, the people explicitly ask for a king, and God responds. Samuel himself serves the pivotal role of transition between the judges and the kings. Samuel and his sons will serve as the last of the judges, although Samuel is a much more positive figure than most of the judges we encountered previously. Samuel will then anoint the first king (and the second king). So, he closes out one era and ushers in the next. 1 Samuel-2 Kings Even though we refer to this entire set of books as a longer history, there is a sense in which Joshua and Judges can each stand alone as independent books. With 1 Samuel, however, we start a new, four-volume work, often referred to as Samuel-Kings. (In fact, in Greek, these four books are treated as a single work, 1- 4 Kingdoms.) These four books tell a continuous narrative of the time of Samuel down through the exile of the southern kingdom. The main theme of these four books is the monarchy, from beginning to end. In the spring, we’ll get into the books of Chronicles, and we’ll spend some time then comparing those books to Samuel-Kings, since the time periods covered by these two histories overlaps. But we’ll note right now a couple of key things about the history in Samuel-Kings. First is the simple fact that these books cover the history of both the northern and southern kingdoms, through their parallel monarchies and the time of their exile. (Chronicles covers only the south.) Second is the connection to the book of Deuteronomy as a standard of evaluation. The point of the Deuteronomistic History is to explain why God’s people ended up in exile. Since that was the result, the history isn’t sugar-coated. Samuel-Kings puts the monarchy fully on display, warts and all. So even David and Solomon, for as great as they come across, are still shown quite honestly to be sinners (unlike in Chronicles). But we will also see the emphasis on God’s covenant and commitment. 1 Dates and Chronology Saul (r. ca. 1020–1000 BC); David (r. ca. 1000–960 BC) (see Enter the Bible) Up to this point, we have avoided dates for people and events, simply because the further back we go in time, the harder it is to pin down those numbers. On the flip side, the more we progress in time, the more archaeological and historical information we have available to corroborate names and places and to date them. For 1 Samuel, think simply in terms of date ranges, so that we have a concept of when we’re talking about. Most broadly, the events of 1 Samuel most likely take place during the 11th century BC. More specifically, Saul reigned roughly between 1020 and 1000 BC, and David reigned roughly between 1000 and 960 BC. (Those are the dates given at Enter the Bible, by a professor at Luther Seminary. However, other scholars give different dates, within a range of about 30 to 50 years of that.) So, as we read these stories, we’re talking about things that happened 3000 years ago. But for as long ago as that was, it is amazing how little people have changed. Even if you move that date forward, because these books were composed in their final form in the exile, which was about 500 years later, still—in 2500 years, people haven’t changed much. The Monarchy 1 Samuel 8:10-18 Why did the Israelites want a king so much? They first ask for a king when Samuel is older and his sons are not faithfully following in his footsteps as judges (ch. 8). The main reason they give is that all the surrounding nations have kings. They specify two things that a king does: he governs, and he leads in battle. So, a king could bring the tribes together as a unified force in a way that no leader had since Joshua. With a leader, they also gain a central capital and a standing military. A king therefore represents power and strength in ways that other nations will understand. Why didn’t God want the Israelites to have a king? God gives Samuel the words of warning to pass on to the people, in 8:10-18. The bottom line in this warning is that a king will use the Israelites for a standing army and for labor, and he will tax them for his own wealth and the wealth of his friends. In other words, a king will exploit the poor to line the pockets of the rich. But God is also warning the people not to call out to him for help when that happens, because all he’s going to do is say, “I told you so.” We see especially with David and Solomon how even good kings can go bad. Both of them abuse their power in a way that exploits their fellow Israelites. With David, we see this especially with Bathsheba and Uriah. With Solomon, we see it especially in his use of forced labor for his own luxury and building projects. In contrast to this, the book of Ruth stands as an example of how God intended for things to work: he gave the people the laws they needed to live by that would protect the people. If they would live by those laws, like Boaz did, they wouldn’t need kings over them to enforce the laws. The problem is that the kings were ultimately better at forgetting the laws and breaking them than they were at modeling them or enforcing them. So, if even good kings can go bad, then why did God give in and let the Israelites have a king when they demanded one? • God lets humans make our own choices, even bad ones, and when we insist on doing things our own way, God has a history of letting us try it our own way, so that we can find out for ourselves it was a bad idea. In a positive sense, God lets us learn lessons the hard way, if that’s the only way we’ll learn, with the end result that we’ll come back to God in humility and try his way instead. 2 In a negative sense, God hands us over to the consequences of our own sins, so that if we insist on doing things our own way, God allows us to suffer the negative results, and essentially we end up punishing ourselves. We saw that at the end of Judges, and Paul talks about the same thing in Romans 1. • In the larger scheme of salvation history, the monarchy points us forward to Christ the King and the kingdom of God, so the fact of monarchy was not necessarily bad in and of itself, and it did move forward the story of salvation history. Deuteronomy 17:14-20 Before they even enter the land, Deuteronomy anticipates the day when they’ll have a king. They’re told that it’s okay, as long as they follow certain restrictions: • The king must be an Israelite, not a foreigner. • He shouldn’t acquire horses. (This relates to military might and the fact that God wanted the kings to rely on God for their success, not on chariots or the strength of a standing army.) • He shouldn’t acquire many wives, “or else his heart will turn away [from God].” (This is exactly what is later described as Solomon’s greatest downfall.) • He shouldn’t acquire too much wealth. • He should keep a copy of the law on hand, and regularly read it and follow it. (We will later see that this is not maintained over time, since in Josiah’s day they rediscover the book of the law, indicating that it has long been forgotten and is no longer followed.) • He is also not to exalt himself over his fellow Israelites (and God is warning here through Samuel that this is exactly what the king will do).
Recommended publications
  • Περίληψη : Χρονολόγηση Γεωγραφικός Εντοπισμός Ionic Colonization
    IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Deger-Jalkotzy Segred (19/2/2004) Για παραπομπή : Deger-Jalkotzy Segred , "Ionic Colonization", 2004, Εγκυκλοπαίδεια Μείζονος Ελληνισμού, Μ. Ασία URL: <http://www.ehw.gr/l.aspx?id=4675> Ionic Colonization Περίληψη : According to the ancient sources, Ionia consisted of twelve cities founded by a Greek population who left mainland Greece. Several issues concerning the reasons, the chronology as well as the ethnic identity of the immigrants or colonists have arisen and they still remain the focal point of a persistent debate among scholars. Χρονολόγηση 11th century B.C. (?) Γεωγραφικός εντοπισμός Asia Minor 1. Ionic Colonization: the written testimony During historical times Greek Ionia consisted of the twelve cities of the Panionic league: Miletus, Myus, Priene, Ephesos, Colophon, Lebedos, Teos, Clazomenae, Erythrae, Phocaea, and the island-states of Samos and Chios. According to the ancient sources, these cities were founded in the course of a migration movement which had set off from Athens, and which was led by the sons of the Athenian king Codrus. The reason of the exodus was ascribed by the ancient authors to a fight between the sons of Codrus for the succession to the throne, in which Medon prevailed.1 1.1 Herodotus Three ancient authors have dealt with the Ionic Migration in detail. According to Herodotus2 the Ionians had originally inhabited twelve cities in the Peloponnesian region of Achaea.3 As soon as they were expelled by the Achaeans, they sought refuge in Athens. Their descendants emigrated to Asia Minor, where they founded twelve cities in remembrance of their earlier settlement in Achaea.
    [Show full text]
  • SEA PEOPLES” and CANAAN in TRANSITION C
    “SEA PEOPLES” AND CANAAN IN TRANSITION c. 1200-950 B.C. The Levant underwent significant changes and transformations between 1200 and 950 B.C., a period which corresponds to the end of the Late Bronze Age and to Iron Age I. The Bronze Age Canaanite and North-Syrian city-state system was then replaced by an ethno-political structure in which the various regions of the Levant were inhabited by different peoples. This change was accompanied by the collapse of the Hittite empire, by a considerable shrinking of the Assyrian power basis, and by the evanescence of the Egyptian control in Syro-Phoenicia and in Canaan, with concomitant and widespread destructions of the urban cen- tres. The consequence was the abrupt and of historical records provided by the cuneiform archives of Hattusha, Emar, and Ugarit, which were not replaced by a sufficient amount of reliable indigenous sources. Only a few inscriptions, especially from Byblos, and some passages hypo- thetically distinguishable in the biblical accounts can be considered as historical sources related to this period. This lack of indigenous docu- ments is by no means filled by the rare external references in Egypt and in Assyria, although one cannot neglect the “Israel Stela” of Merneptah, the Medinet Habu inscriptions and reliefs, which describe the wars of Ramses III against the “Sea Peoples” in his 8th year, the statement in Papyrus Harris I, that Ramses III settled his defeated foes in his strong- holds, the Tale of Wen Amon and the Onomasticon of Amenope, two literary works from the 11th century B.C., as well as the annals of Tiglath-pileser I (1114-1076 B.C.).
    [Show full text]
  • POMEGRANATE (PUNICA GRANATUM L.) from MOTYA and ITS DEEPEST ORIENTAL ROOTS Lorenzo Nigro
    [Vicino Oriente XXII (2018), pp. 49-90] POMEGRANATE (PUNICA GRANATUM L.) FROM MOTYA AND ITS DEEPEST ORIENTAL ROOTS Lorenzo Nigro - Federica Spagnoli Sapienza University of Rome The pomegranate bush raises its voice - tiny, insistent, and shrill: My seeds shine like the teeth of my mistress, the shape of my fruit is round like her breasts. I’m her favorite, I know, sweetest tree in the orchard, looking my best through every season.1 ὣς φάτο: γήθησεν δὲ περίφρων Περσεφόνεια, καρπαλίμως δ᾽ ἀνόρουσ᾽ ὑπὸ χάρματος: αὐτὰρ ὅ γ᾽ αὐτὸς ῥοιῆς κόκκον ἔδωκε φαγεῖν μελιηδέα λάθρῃ, ἀμφὶ ἓ νωμήσας, ἵνα μὴ μένοι ἤματα πάντα αὖθι παρ᾽ αἰδοίῃ Δημήτερι κυανοπέπλῳ.2 Pomegranate remains and representations found in the Phoenician site of Motya in Western Sicily give the cue for a summary study of this plant and its fortune in the Near East and the Mediterranean. Fruits offered in wells, a terracotta relief depicting a pomegranate held by a goddess found in the Sacred Area of the Kothon at Motya, and, especially, a pottery vase in the shape of a pomegranate retrieved inside the Temple of Astarte in the same compound, witness the symbolic transcultural role of this fruit and of the pomegranate tree in ancient Mediterranean, from its farthest oriental origins to modern art and religion. Keywords: pomegranate; Punica granatum L.; Motya; Astarte; Demetra 1. POMEGRANATE: THE DIVINE POME [LN] Pomegranate is a divine gift in the imagery of antiquity. It has so many evocative features: its blossom and flower, the squatted fat spherical shape of the pome, with a pointed or crowned tip (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • 127567796.23.Pdf
    ■ $)r JU'CniUcI)1* (Eburatianal IDorks, PUBLISHED BT '» ; OriVER & BOYD, EDINBURGH; i SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, A CO., LONDON; AND SOLD BY*“) ALL BOOKSELLERS. ' A valuable Series of Works has been prepared by Dn ; S! M'Culloch,Edinburgh, andformerly now MinisterHead-master of the of Westthe Circus-Place Church, Greenock, School, :■ |; businessfor the useto instructof Seminaries his pupils where in the the meaning preceptor of whatmakes is itread, his ; j1 as well as in the art of reading. This series will be found to ! j l .gradationsserve the double to the pronunciationpurpose of introducing of the English the scholar language, by easyand ; ! jr ancle»erciseof providing hishim opening with a faculties. kind of reading adapted to interest : ; In trie introductory Books, the lessons are arranged on the j j ;; soundsprinciple before of familiarizing embarrassing the him pupil with varietieswith the andmore anomalies common ; «| jjj: ! gradualso that heorder may of bo development taught the suitedlaws ofto hisEnglish tender Orthoepy capacity. in a ■! !|c: lint Rcatiittg-pook, ; 18mo, 24 pages, price lid. in stiff wrapper. 13th Edition. i |: lessonsThis onlittle the manual long and contains short sounds the Alphabet, of the vowels and progressive ; no moro J; |i thesebeing sounds,attempted and in with it than the merelyprimitive to familiarizesounds of the the consonants. pupil with ; Scronii Rcatiing-|0oh, J l8mo, 48 pages, price 3d. in stiff wrapper. 13th Edition. J \; of Thisdouble book consonants contains progressiveand diphthongs, lessons and on on the the pronunciation middle and J! I! considerablebroad sounds number of the vowels. of new sounds,The pupil and is hereto those introduced consonants to a ;; ;; havinghis entering two different on the Thiud sounds, Reading-Book.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil As a Lubricant in the Ancient Middle East
    Tribology Online, 2, 2 (2007) 44-49. ISSN 1881-2198 DOI 10.2474/trol.2.44 Oil as a Lubricant in the Ancient Middle East Michael Nosonovsky National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 8520, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA [email protected] ( Manuscript received 12 January 2007; accepted 8 March 2007; published 15 April 2007 ) There is a significant interest toward the history of tribology in both engineering and historical communities. However, there is a gap between engineers and historians in their approach to the topic, and existing literature sometimes overlooks various cultural influences, in particular, oriental ones, which affected the tribological science and technology. We consider the early history of lubrication and show that while the evidences of usage of lubricants (water, gypsum, and animal fats) in Ancient Egypt in 2nd-3rd millennia BC are hypothetic, rather than established facts, the Hebrew Bible contains earliest records of using oil as a lubricant. In particular, the account of rubbing the shield of King Saul (11th century BC) is discussed as well as other similar cases. These findings allow us to better understand the universal nature of history of science and technology as a multicultural phenomenon. Keywords: history of lubrication, olive oil, gypsum, ancient Middle East artefact, including coatings, sledge surfaces etc. and 1. Introduction investigation of ancient technology used to create them7,8). Although the words “tribophisics/tribology” were Because of this interest toward the history of the coined only some 60 years ago by D. Tabor and H.P. tribology both in the engineering and historical Jost from the Greek word tribos, meaning “rubbing”, scientific communities, a number of publications have tribological knowledge and technology existed from the 1) appeared in the past years, reporting and reviewing earliest time .
    [Show full text]
  • Philistine State Or Neo-Hittite Kingdom?
    Emanuel, Jeffrey P. King Taita and his “Palistin”: philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom? Antiguo Oriente: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente Vol. 13, 2015 Este documento está disponible en la Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina, repositorio institucional desarrollado por la Biblioteca Central “San Benito Abad”. Su objetivo es difundir y preservar la producción intelectual de la Institución. La Biblioteca posee la autorización del autor para su divulgación en línea. Cómo citar el documento: Emanuel, Jeffrey P. “King Taita and his “Palistin” : philistine state or neo-hittite kingdom?” [en línea], Antiguo Oriente : Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente 13 (2015). Disponible en: http://bibliotecadigital.uca.edu.ar/repositorio/revistas/king-taita-palistin-emanuel.pdf [Fecha de consulta:..........] . 01 Emanuel King Taita_Antiguo Oriente 27/06/2016 12:40 p.m. Página 11 KING TAITA AND HIS “PALISTIN”: PHILISTINE STATE OR NEO-HITTITE KINGDOM?* JEFFREY P. EMANUEL [email protected] Center for Hellenic Studies Harvard University Cambridge, USA Summary: King Taita and His “Palistin”: Philistine State or Neo-Hittite Kingdom? The end of the Hittite Empire and the destruction and abandonment of Alalakh repre- sents a cultural break between the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages in the ‘Amuq Valley. In the Iron I, a population with clear ties to the greater Aegean world, perhaps related to the Philistines of southern Canaan, established an agro-pastoral settlement at Tell Ta‘yinat and the surrounding area. This occupation, marked by Field Phases 6–3 at Ta‘yinat, was both materially and chronologically ephemeral, and should be viewed as a cultural outlier sandwiched between the Hittite-controlled LBA and later Iron I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Calendar
    Here is the ninth legend. This is about the Chinese Calendar. Can you find out more about it? Can you find different versions of this legend? The Chinese Calendar The traditional Chinese calendar has been used for centuries by farmers to tell them when to plant and when to harvest. It also continues to define the dates of festivals and is used for horoscopes in China. This calendar has a very long history going back to the Xia (21st century BC - 16th century BC) and Shang Dynasty (16th century BC - 11th century BC). It is based on a unique combination of astronomy and geography through observation and exploration. It is also referred to as the Lunar Calendar, Yin calendar, Xia calendar or the old Chinese calendar. A lunar month is the time between one full moon and the next, approximately twenty-eight days during which the moon orbits the earth. The lunar year consists of thirteen months of twenty-eight days each. This means that the Chinese New Year falls on varying dates between the latter part of January and early February. According to the Lunar Calendar, a new month begins when the moon moves into line with the earth and the sun. This is called 'Chu Yi' or 'Shuo Ri' (the first day of a lunar month). The year was divided into in 24 equal parts, each forming the 24 solar terms. The month with its first day nearest the Beginning of Spring (the first solar term) is the first lunar month. This varies between January 20th and February 20th.
    [Show full text]
  • Louis Dautais 2020. “Review Of: Peter M. Fischer and Teresa Bürge (Eds) 2017. Sea Peoples Up-To-Date. New Research on Transfo
    Louis Dautais 2020. “Review of: Peter M. Fischer and Teresa Bürge (eds) 2017. Sea Peoples Up-to-Date. New Research on Transformations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the 13th-11th Centuries BCE (Proceedings of the ESFWorkshop held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 3-4 Nov. 2014)”, published in Journal of Greek Archaeology Vol. 5, pp. 585-591. Peter M. Fischer and Teresa Bürge (eds.). Sea Peoples Up-to-Date. New Research on Transformations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the 13th-11th Centuries BCE (Proceedings of the ESF-Workshop held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 3-4 November 2014). Denkschriften der Gesamtakademie 81; Contributions to the Chronology of the Eastern Mediterranean 35. pp. 412, figs. 92. 2017. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. ISBN 978-3-7001-7963-4 paperback €149; e-publication €109. This volume is the outcome of an international workshop held at the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna in November 2014. Since the first use of the term “Sea Peoples” (« Peuples de la Mer ») in 1867 by French Egyptologist Emmanuel de Rougé,1 the topic has not lost its popularity, with plenty of attention in recent years, including now published workshops at Louvain-la-Neuve (in 2014)2 and Warsaw (in 2016).3 The present volume wanted to go beyond the information provided by the texts and aimed at presenting new archaeological data and their analysis, covering a wider geographical region and implying a more holistic approach than ever before. As the subtitle indicates, the specific aim of the volume is to study the various political, economic, social and cultural transformations in the Eastern Mediterranean from the 13th to 11th centuries BC4 that can be connected to the Sea Peoples phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Saul Old Testament Facts
    Saul Old Testament Facts Irrecusably contiguous, Hurley enervating keratitis and relay manse. Which Bjorne paik so punily that Lon upbuild her ascendances? Deane remains khedival after Raynor psychs dreamlessly or decussates any year-ends. See proof either have been out of man from the king of the church of old saul was By Redlands Daily Facts redlandsdfmdevcom July 7 2010 at 1200 am lord all recognize the scoundrels in the Bible one fan my favorites for sheer political. Absalom began to kill david crept up to his glory appears as seen weaker people out for saul old testament facts. King Saul A re-examination of another reign to its effects on. Israel and moses did just a saul old testament facts. You ads to the saul old testament facts i needed an affair with facts audio programming whenever you are not wealthy rancher in drawing the. Because four people made return of David's single victory than view of Saul's the king went into street rage and became mayor of David From every moment he plotted to kill me Instead for building up Israel King Saul wasted most from his time chasing David through the hills. This would die, saul old testament facts. Beth Shean in the Bible and Archaeology Biblical. Saul of Tarsus Condensed Biblical Encyclopedia Scripture facts on Saul of Tarsus Free online bible encyclopedia for surveillance of verses and characters. The gut probably more interpretive than factual indicates belief be the. Cathy and sent word of facts about himself up saul old testament facts stated, i believe that he saw samuel told national fund warehouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11Th Edition, by Various 1
    Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, by Various 1 Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, by Various The Project Gutenberg EBook of Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Volume 9, Slice 6, by Various This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Volume 9, Slice 6 "English Language" to "Epsom Salts" Author: Various Release Date: February 17, 2011 [EBook #35306] Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA *** Produced by Marius Masi, Don Kretz and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net Transcriber's notes: (1) Numbers following letters (without space) like C2 were originally printed in subscript. Letter subscripts are preceded by an underscore, like Cn. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, by Various 2 (2) Characters following a carat (^) were printed in superscript. (3) Side-notes were relocated to function as titles of their respective paragraphs. (4) Macrons and breves above letters and dots below letters were not inserted. (5) Small and capital EZH letters are subtituted with [gh] and [Gh] respectively. Thorn is subtituted with th or Th, and eth is subtituted with dh. (6) [root] stands for the root symbol; [alpha], [beta], etc. for greek letters. (7) The following typographical errors have been corrected: ARTICLE ENGLISH LANGUAGE: "The writers of each district wrote in the dialect familiar to them; and between extreme forms the difference was so great as to amount to unintelligibility ..." 'familiar' amended from 'familar'.
    [Show full text]
  • Telling Stories: the Mycenaean Origins of the Philistines
    GUY D. MIDDLETON TELLING STORIES: THE MYCENAEAN ORIGINS OF THE PHILISTINES Summary. The story of the Philistines as Mycenaean or Aegean migrants, refugees who fled the Aegean after the collapse of the palace societies c.1200 BC, bringing an Aegean culture and practices to the Eastern Mediterranean, is well known. Accepted as essentially true by some, yet rejected as little more than a modern myth by others, the migration narrative retains a central place in the archaeology and historiography of the Eastern Mediterranean in the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age (LBA/EIA). In recent years, and despite an increasingly shaky theoretical basis, the migration hypothesis has nevertheless seemed to drown out other interpretations and characterizations of the period, claiming a normative position that is undeserved. In this paper I explore the continuing power of this nineteenth century narrative and seek to show why it is less convincing than its prominent status would suggest. INTRODUCTION Dalglish (2005, 148–9) has defined historical myths as ‘narratives which have a basis in history, but which have been embellished and over-emphasised to the extent that they reduce history to a limited series of caricatures and stereotypes’. One such enduring myth is that of an ‘Aegean’, usually meaning ‘Mycenaean’, migration to Canaan at the end of the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age c.1200 BC, which serves for many as an explanation of the origin of the Philistines (Dothan 1982; Dothan and Dothan 1992; Stager 1995). This is part of the larger story of a supposed migration of the ‘Sea Peoples’. As Stone wrote, ‘the origins of the Sea Peoples’ culture lie in Mycenaean Greece’ (Stone 1995, 13).
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Checklist (PDF File, About 328KB
    201 213 226-2 240 255 262 269 276 Lid with a Knob (fragmented) Lebes with Snake Busts Fibula Necklace with Pendants of an Ring Pair of Earrings Necklace Finger Ring 2nd half of 14th–early 13th century B.C. 1st quarter of 7th century B.C. 2nd quarter of 7th century B.C. Acorn and a Ram’s Head 2nd half of 4th century B.C. ca.mid-4th century B.C. 1st–3rd century A.D. 3rd century A.D. Sofia, National Institute of Archaeology Roma, Museo Nazionale Etrusco di Villa Giulia Firenze, Museo Archeologico Nazionale 4th century B.C. Firenze, Museo Archeologico Nazionale Roma, Museo Nazionale Etrusco di Villa Giulia Rijksmuseum van Oudheden, Leiden Rijksmuseum van Oudheden, Leiden with Museum at the Bulgarian Academy of Musei Vaticani, Museo Gregoriano Etrusco, Collezione Castellani Sciences 214 227 Città del Vaticano 256 270 277 THE 263 202 Patera Dragon-Type Fibula 241 Pair of Amulets Necklace Bulla (pendant) 1st quarter of 7th century B.C. 1st half of 7th century B.C. late 6th century B.C. Necklace 1st–3rd century A.D. 1st century A.D. OLDEN Three-Part Vessel with Roma, Museo Nazionale Etrusco di Villa Giulia Firenze, Museo Archeologico Nazionale Ivy Leaf Diadem Firenze, Museo Archeologico Nazionale 1st–2nd century A.D. Rijksmuseum van Oudheden, Leiden Rijksmuseum van Oudheden, Leiden Decoration of Canelures ca.4th–3rd century B.C. Roma, Museo Nazionale Etrusco di Villa Giulia G 2nd half of 14th–early 13th century B.C. Musei Vaticani, Museo Gregoriano Etrusco, Collezione Castellani Treasured Gold from Sofia, National Institute of Archaeology 215 228 Città del Vaticano 257 271 278 with Museum at the Bulgarian Academy of Necklace with Anthropomorphic Dragon-Type Fibula Amulet with a Representation of 264 Earring Medallion the Ancient Mediterranean World Sciences Pendants mid-7th century B.C.
    [Show full text]