RESEARCH FRONT CSIRO PUBLISHING
Marine and Freshwater Research, 2020, 71, 355–373 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF19200
Some observations on the biogeochemical cycling of zinc in the Australian sector of the Southern Ocean: a dedication to Keith Hunter
Michael J. EllwoodA, Robert StrzepekB, Xiaoyu ChenA, Thomas W. TrullC and Philip W. BoydB
AResearch School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas. 7004, Australia. CCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas. 7004, Australia. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Abstract. In this study we investigated the distribution of dissolved and particulate zinc (dZn and pZn respectively) and its isotopes in the Subantarctic Zone as part of a Geotraces Process voyage. dZn and pZn depth profiles contrasted each other, with dZn showing depletion within the euphotic zone while pZn profiles showed enrichment. Fitting a power law equation to the pZn profiles produced an attenuation factor of 0.82, which contrasted values for particulate phosphorus, cadmium and copper. The results indicate that zinc has a longer regeneration length scale than phosphorus and cadmium, but shorter than copper. The differential regeneration of pZn relative to that of particulate phosphorus likely explains why 66 dZn appears to have a deeper regeneration profile than that of phosphate. The dZn isotope (d Zndissolved) profiles collected across the Subantarctic Zone showed differing profile structures. For one station collected within an isolated cold-core 66 eddy (CCE), d Zndissolved showed surface enrichment relative to deep waters. The corresponding pZn isotope profiles within the CCE did not show enrichment; rather, they were subtly depleted in surface waters and then converged to similar values at depth. Zinc isotope fractionation can be explained through a combination of fractionation processes associated with uptake by phytoplankton, zinc complexation by natural organic ligands and zinc regeneration from particulate matter.
Received 30 May 2019, accepted 7 September 2019, published online 3 December 2019
Introduction Southern Ocean into the global ocean thermocline. The SAZ Zinc is an essential micronutrient for phytoplankton because it is is bound by the Subtropical Front (STF) to the north and the involved in several key enzyme reactions within cells. The Subantarctic Front (SAF) and the Polar Front (PF) to the south oceanic distribution of zinc is similar to that of silicic acid, (Fig. 1). The SAZ is a major contributor to oceanic uptake of 1 which has puzzled researchers for many years (Bruland et al. CO2, with an annual flux .1 Gt C year (Metzl et al. 1999; 1978; Hunter and Boyd 1999). Recent modelling efforts suggest Fro¨licher et al. 2015). Although primary production within the that the coupling of these two nutrients may result from: (1) SAZ makes a major contribution to global CO2 uptake, primary physical circulation within the Southern Ocean and biogeo- production in SAZ waters is limited by silica, iron and light chemical modification of these waters by diatoms (Vance et al. availability (Boyd et al. 1999; Hutchins et al. 2001; Petrou et al. 2017; de Souza et al. 2018); and (2) biological uptake in the 2011; Westwood et al. 2011). In SAZ surface waters, silicic acid Southern Ocean coupled with the reversible scavenging of zinc concentrations typically range between ,0.5 and 3 mM(Lourey onto sinking particles (Roshan et al. 2018; Weber et al. 2018). and Trull 2001), which are on the cusp of being growth limiting These modelling studies rely heavily on the concentration and (Paasche 1973; Franck et al. 2005). isotope composition of zinc in the dissolved phase. Further, in To date, there have only been a handful of studies looking at all these modelling scenarios, the Southern Ocean is critical in zinc cycling in the SAZ. Work by Ellwood (2008), Samanta determining the initial biogeochemical status of zinc, silicic acid et al. (2017) and Butler et al. (2013) for the south-west Pacific and phosphate in surface and subsurface waters, which is then sector of the Southern Ocean all showed depletion of zinc and propagated globally by mode and intermediate water masses silicic in surface waters, with concentrations ranging between (Sarmiento et al. 2004). 0.06 and 0.36 nmol kg 1. Although these zinc concentrations are The Subantarctic Zone (SAZ) of the Southern Ocean repre- low, there is little evidence to suggest that they are low enough to sents ,50% of the total area of the Southern Ocean and is an limit phytoplankton growth (Ellwood 2004; Butler et al. 2013). important contributor to the export of nutrients from the Understanding the processes that affect the cycling of zinc in the
Journal compilation Ó CSIRO 2020 Open Access CC BY-NC-ND www.publish.csiro.au/journals/mfr 356 Marine and Freshwater Research M. J. Ellwood et al.
(a)(b) 35°S 12°S
40°S 24°S
36°S 45°S
48°S 50°S
60°S 55°S 120°E 135°E 150°E 165°E 180°W 130°E 135°E 140°E 145°E 150°E 155°E 160°E
–7000 –6000 –5000 –4000 –3000 –2000 –10000 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Depth (m) Chl-a (μg L–1)
Fig. 1. (a) Bathymetry map showing the locations of the Cold Core Eddy (CCE), Subantarctic Zone (SAZ) and Southern Ocean Time Series (SOTS) stations. The positions of the Subtropical Front (STF) and the Subantarctic Front (SAF) are also drawn based on data from Orsi et al. (1995). (b) Satellite-derived chlorophyll (Chl)-a concentrations for March 2016. Maps were drawn using M_map (ver. 1.4k, R. Pawlowicz, see www.eoas. ubc.ca/,rich/map.html).
SAZ is important because this region is where Subantarctic circulation near Tasmania that is associated with the westward Mode Water (SAMW) forms and ventilates lower latitudes leakage of the East Australia Current (Weeding and Trull 2014; (Sarmiento et al. 2004; Salle´e et al. 2006). Shadwick et al. 2015). For the present study, the SOTS site was To date, little work has looked at zinc isotope cycling occupied between 18 and 21 March 2016 and again between 19 between the dissolved and particulate phases (dZn and pZn and 27 March 2017. respectively). The aim of the work presented here was to The cyclonic cold-core eddy (CCE) site was studied between understand the cycling of dZn and pZn in the subantarctic waters 28 March and 3 April 2016 (Fig. 1), with its centre located at south of Australia. This work forms part of the international ,50.48S, 147.18E. The eddy was ,190 km in diameter and was GEOTRACES program. a stable feature that had formed in mid-February 2016, ,1.28 further south of the sampling site near the SAF (Moreau et al. Materials and methods 2017). After formation, the eddy moved slowly northward Sampling sites across the northern extension of the SAF with a rotation speed 1 The Southern Ocean Time Series (SOTS) site is located at 478S, of 0.527 rad day (Moreau et al. 2017; Patel et al. 2019). The 1428E, south-west of Tasmania, Australia (Fig. 1). This has been biogeochemical properties of this eddy differ from external a long-term mooring site where biophysicochemical water waters (Moreau et al. 2017; Patel et al. 2019). Because this column measurements have been made since 1998 and it pres- eddy became ‘structurally closed’ after development, its ability ently forms part of the Australian Integrated Marine Observing to entrain and detrain nutrients, dissolved iron, phytoplankton System (IMOS). The SOTS site is located on the northern edge and zooplankton was restricted. That is, it behaved much like a of the SAZ, with typical sea surface temperatures ranging static mesocosm. between ,9 and 138C(Fig. 1; Herraiz-Borreguero and Rintoul The other site of interest was located at 51.908S, 148.518E 2011). The site is in deep water (.4500 m) and is located on the within the SAZ and was designated as the ‘SAZ’ site (Fig. 1). western side of the Tasman Rise. Although the site is located on It was located north of the northern extension of the the northern edge of the SAZ, upper ocean oceanography at the SAF and is regarded as having biogeochemical properties site can be complex. The oceanographic properties of the site are typical of the SAZ. The site was sampled between 7 and 11 generally representative of the Australian sector of the SAZ, but April 2016. the site is also affected by Tasman Sea Outflow water, which forms part of the return flow to the South Pacific super gyre Equipment cleaning (Ridgway 2007; Oliver and Holbrook 2014). This westward- All equipment used in this study had been extensively acid flowing water exhibits some properties of subtropical water cleaned. Typically, sample bottles were soaked for 1 week in sourced from the Tasman Sea, but is also affected by eddy 15% aqua regia (HCl : HNO3 3 : 1) reagent grade, rinsed and Zinc cycling in the Southern Ocean Marine and Freshwater Research 357
then soaked for 1 further week in 2% HNO3. Water used to rinse Trace metal analysis bottles was purified using a water purification system Purification and separation of zinc from the seawater matrix (Millipore, Melbourne, Vic., Australia). The final step in the was performed by solid-phase extraction using chelating ion process was to fill bottles with 0.5% (w/w) Teflon-distilled chromatography followed by anion exchange chromatography (designated here as ‘t-acid’; Savillex, Minneapolis, MN, USA) 66 (Samanta et al. 2016, 2017). For dZn isotope (d Zndissolved) HNO3 (Mattinson 1972) and then double-bag them. Laboratory determination, seawater samples (2 L) were spiked with a plasticware was acid cleaned by heating in aqua regia followed 67Zn–68Zn double spike (3–6 : 1 spike : sample ratio; Samanta by heating with 0.5% t-HNO3. et al. 2016, 2017). Samples were left overnight to equilibrate and then preconcentrated at a pH of 4.5 by passing them over 0.5-mL Conductivity, temperature and depth and nutrient sampling columns packed with Nobias PA Chelate PA1L resin (Hitachi- Conductivity, temperature and depth (CTD) profile data and Hitech, Tokyo, Japan) at a flow rate of 2 mL min 1. Samples were water samples for nutrient and biological parameters were col- rinsed with 4 mL of ammonium acetate buffer solution (1% w/w) lected with a winch-lowered package consisting of an SBE followed by elution with 4 mL of 1 M t-HNO3. Samples were 911plus CTD (Seabird, Seattle, WA, USA), a Turner Designs evaporated to dryness and redissolved with 0.5 mL of 6 M t-HCl. (San Jose, CA, USA) fluorometer and a 24-bottle SBE 32 Samples were further purified using the anion exchange proce- Carousel water sampler (Seabird). Salinities were standardised to dure described by Poitrasson and Freydier (2005). This procedure standard seawater (Ocean Scientific International Ltd, Ports- involved loading samples onto ,200-mL columns filled with mouth, UK). Samples for macronutrients, phosphate, nitrate, cleaned AG-MP1 resin (Bio-Rad, Sydney, NSW, Australia). Salts nitrite, ammonia and silicic acid were collected and analysed at and other elements not of interest were eluted from columns by sea on unfiltered samples using a Seal AA3 segmented flow passing 3 1 mL of 6 M t-HCl followed by 3 1mLof0.5M system (Seal Analytical, Mequon, WI, USA) following the t-HCl. This fraction was saved for iron isotope analysis. Zinc was procedures outlined by Armstrong et al. (1967) and Wood et al. eluted from each column by passing 3 1mLof0.5Mt-HNO3 (1967). Horizontal CTD profile measurements of the water col- over the AG-MP1 resin. The collected zinc samples were evap- umn were made using a towed undulating (0–200 m) SBE 911plus orated to dryness and redissolved in 2% (w/w) HNO3. CTD system (TRIAXUS; MacArtney, Esbjerg, Denmark). Particulate samples for trace element and d66Zn determina- tion were thawed and processed using the acid digestion proto- Primary production measurements col of Eggimann and Betzer (1976), as described by Ellwood Net primary production (i.e. 14C uptake rates) were determined et al. (2015). for water column samples collected at six depths from 0 to 100 m Zinc isotopes were determined using a NeptunePlus multi- (Boyd et al. 2005). These measurements involved spiking collector ICPMS (ThermoScientific, Sydney, NSW, Australia) 14 with an APEX-IR introduction system (ESI, Omaha, NB, USA) samples with radioactive carbon (NaH CO3) and incubating them for 24 h. The light conditions for the six collection depths and with X-type skimmer cones. At the start of each measurement session, the instrument was tuned for intensities on mass 62Ni, were simulated using neutral density screening for each incu- 63 65 64 66 67 68 bator chamber. After 24 h, samples were filtered, rinsed Cu, Cu, Zn, Zn, Zn and Zn. Samples were analysed in reducing titanium solution to remove extracellular 14C and medium resolution mode in groups of three, bracketed with the archived for scintillation counting ashore. IRMM-3702 standard (Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Geel, Belgium). A 2% (v/v) HNO3 blank mea- Trace metal sampling surement was made before each sample or standard measurement. All measurements were made as one block of 45 cycles with a 4-s Seawater samples for trace metal and isotope determination were integration time. On-peak blank correction of sample isotope collected using acid-cleaned, Teflon-coated, externally sprung intensities was undertaken by subtracting the average intensity of 12-L Niskin bottles attached to an autonomous rosette (Seabird) the 45 cycle measurements for each of the measured isotopes equipped with an SBE 911plus CTD unit (Seabird). Upon from the isotope intensities measured for each blank. retrieval, the Niskin bottles were transferred to a clean container All zinc isotope measurements were collected relative to the laboratory. Seawater samples for dissolved trace metal analysis standard reference material IRMM-3702, which is isotopically m were filtered through acid-cleaned, 0.2- m capsule filters (Supor indistinguishable from the new zinc standard ‘AA-ETH Zn’ AcroPak 200; Pall, New York, NY, USA) and acidified with (Archer et al. 2017). The IRMM-3702 standard is offset by t-HNO3 to a final pH of #1.8. The sampling protocols followed 0.30 0.05% (s.d) with respect to the Johnson Matthey (JMC) recommendations in the GEOTRACES Cruise and Methods Lyon standard (Cloquet et al. 2008; Moeller et al. 2012; Archer Manual (Cookbook) (http://www.geotraces.org/science/inter- et al. 2017). Zinc isotope values were subsequently related to the calibration/222-sampling-and-sample-handling-protocols-for- JMC Lyon standard by adding 0.30% to all our results. Thus, the geotraces-cruises, accessed 10 November 2015). d66Zn values are reported using the following equation: Particulate trace metal samples were collected in situ onto ! acid-leached 0.2-mm Supor (142-mm diameter) filters (Pall) d66Zn=d64Zn using six large-volume dual-head pumps (McLane Research d66Zn ¼ sample 1000 þ 0:3 ð1Þ JMCLyon 66 = 64 Laboratories, East Falmouth, MA, USA), deployed at various d Zn d ZnIRMM3702 water depths. For most profiles, one pump depth was used as a blank check whereby only 4–8 L of water was pumped through Zinc isotope reproducibility was tested by processing an in- the filter. house seawater standard multiple times. This standard was 358 Marine and Freshwater Research M. J. Ellwood et al. collected at a depth of 3500 m during the PINTS (‘Primary (i.e. upwelling) occurs in the Southern Ocean primarily south of productivity induced by Iron and Nitrogen in the Tasman Sea’) the PF and not in the SAZ and SAF regions examined here campaign in 2010 from Station P3 (Hassler et al. 2014). Full (Speer et al. 2000); (2) zonal advection brings in waters with processing of the sample produced a mean ( 2 s.d.) similar properties from upstream in the Antarctic Circumpolar 66 d ZnJMCLyon value of 0.63 0.02 (n ¼ 3), which is isotopically Current (Trull et al. 2001b), and can thus be ignored; and (3) indistinguishable from the mean ( 2 s.d.) value of 0.60 0.05 meridional transport is dominated by northward Ekman trans- (n ¼ 6) obtained by Samanta et al. (2017; Table 1). port, and although this does supply nutrients over the annual Elemental analysis for dissolved and particulate copper, mean, in late summer surface concentrations between the SAF cadmium, nickel, manganese, aluminium and phosphorus was and PF zone are very uniform (Trull et al. 2001a), so this term made by removing aliquots from preconcentrated digests can also be ignored. destined for zinc isotope analysis. These were measured by In the model, phytoplankton production (gphyto) is expressed high-resolution inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry as a function of nitrogen biomass. The limiting term (i.e. the (ICP-MS; Element XR; ThermoScientific) in medium resolu- minimum, min) for gphyto is expressed as follows (the definitions tion mode. Iron concentrations were obtained from iron isotope for all symbols and their values are given in Table 3): analysis (M. J. Ellwood, unpubl. data). Blanks associated with ½ ½ ½ the collection and processing of particulate samples are given in ¼ N ; P ; PAR gphyto min Tables 1 and 2, along with results for the analysis of an in-house kphyto:N þ½N kphyto:P þ½P kphyto:PAR þ½PAR standard for dissolved trace metals. Overall, the dissolved ð2Þ results produced in this study are comparable to the results obtained by Samanta et al. (2017) for zinc, Thompson and In the upper water column, at and above the depth of peak Ellwood (2014) for copper and previous measurements made at the Australian National University for iron and nickel in 2011. biomass (i.e. the deep chlorophyll maximum), the regeneration of nutrients back into solution is expressed as a linear function relative to biomass. Below this depth the rate of nutrient regener- One-dimensional biogeochemical modelling ation decreases following the Martin particulate organic carbon The potential processes that affect the distribution of dZn rela- (POC) attenuation expression power law (Martin et al. 1987): tive to that of nitrate or phosphate and phytoplankton biomass b k : ¼ k : ðz=z Þ ð3Þ were explored using a one-dimensional (1-D) model (Fig. 2). regen z regen z0 0 During the development of the model, we were mindful that some processes, (e.g. lateral advection) are not parameterised by where z is depth with respect to z0, which was set to depth below the model. Some of the biological processes parameterised the peak in biomass. This function effectively trends the sinking within the model are also simplified. The rationale for using this particles as transitioning from fresh to refractory with depth. For 1 1-D model is to explore the relative effect (and interplay) that simplicity, the model used single values of kregen (0.35 day ) processes such as phytoplankton utilisation of zinc, zinc com- and the power law exponent b (0.858; Martin et al. 1987) for all plexation to natural organic ligands and regeneration have on components. As shown in the results, it is likely that b varies dZn and pZn isotope profiles. One should be mindful that this among elements, and the ramifications of choosing a single model is not three-dimensional in nature and only extends to value are explored in the Discussion. 500 m (i.e. it lacks the ability to simulate the global processes). For dissolved inorganic nitrogen (NO3), Eqn 4 and 5 express That said, this 1-D model is a useful tool for exploring processes its uptake by phytoplankton, its exchange between boxes above that influence the cycling of zinc within the CCE. (j) and below (j 2) and its regeneration from phytoplankton The 1-D model is based on the model developed by Schlosser (expressed here as particulate organic nitrogen, PON): et al. (2014) and includes one phytoplankton group and refer- ½ ences key nutrients, including nitrate, phosphate, zinc and iron d NO3 j 1 ¼ kmix ð½NO3 þ½NO3 Þ 2 kmix ½NO3 (Fig. 2). Note that the model has an iron component, which will dt j j 2 j 1 þ ½ ½ not be presented in this paper. The model includes mixing, kregen PON j 1 gphyto mmax:phyto NO3 j 1 which supplies nutrients into the euphotic zone and the main loss ð4Þ process for nutrients and zinc from the euphotic zone (organic matter export; Fig. 2). The zinc component within the model Note that the maximum uptake rate mmax.phyto is in units of also includes complexation to natural organic ligands. In the 14 model presented, scavenging of zinc from solution and isotope nitrogen here, and thus scaling to the observed C uptake rates fractionation associated with this potential process are consid- requires adjustment by the Redfield C : N ratio. ered in a limited number of runs (John and Conway 2014; Weber Overall, the change in PON can be expressed as follows: et al. 2018). We justify this because our model focuses on the ½ d PON j 1 upper water column where zinc predominantly complexes to ¼ g m : ½NO þ k ½PON þ phyto max phyto 3 j 1 sink j ð Þ natural organic ligands, which will tend to reduce the free Zn2 dt 5 ½ ½ concentration such that scavenging would be a minor compo- ksink PON j 1 kregen PON j nent of its overall cycling in the upper water column. As mentioned, the model does not include advection, In this expression (Eqn 5), and for the other particle expres- which is justifiable for several reasons: (1) vertical advection sions (Eqn 7, 11; see below), the mixing terms do not appear Table 1. Dissolved trace metal and zinc isotope dataset for samples collected in 2016 and 2017 at the Cold Core Eddy station, the Subantarctic Zone station and at the Southern Ocean Time Series Ocean Southern the in cycling Zinc station Values for d66 Zn are given as the mean 2 s.e. for each measurement. Blanks (n ¼ 5) are based on a 2-L sample being processed. For ‘previous’ measurements, most are unpublished and represent measurements made in 2011 for a large volume sample collected from 3500 m at Station P3 during the PINTS expedition (Hassler et al. 2014). Station P3 was located at 468S, 1608E in the South Tasman Sea. ND, not determined
66 Depth (db) Fe Zn d Zn (%)Al Ni Cu Mn Cd NO3 PO4 Si NH4 NO2 (nmol kg 1 ) (nmol kg 1 ) (nmol kg 1 ) (nmol kg 1 ) (nmol kg 1 ) (nmol kg 1 ) (nmol kg 1 ) (mM) (mM) (mM) (mM) (mM)
Cold Core Eddy 15 0.024 0.3 0.93 0.04 0.14 5.41 0.86 0.17 360 22.2 1.56 3.3 0.32 0.28 40 0.022 0.42 0.67 0.03 0.12 5.37 0.86 0.18 375 22.2 1.56 3.3 0.32 0.28 70 0.018 0.46 0.64 0.03 0.09 5.65 0.9 0.19 384 22.4 1.58 3.4 0.38 0.28 100 0.028 0.63 0.42 0.03 0.27 5.35 0.89 0.2 443 23.3 1.67 3.6 0.81 0.3 150 0.027 0.98 0.50 0.04 0.08 5.69 0.94 0.24 543 24.4 1.74 6.5 0.59 0.55 200 0.033 1.21 0.33 0.03 0.17 5.46 0.98 0.23 580 25.7 1.79 9.7 0.21 0.07 300 0.41 0.9 0.38 0.03 0.67 5.7 0.94 0.24 597 26.6 1.84 14.2 0.15 0.01 750 0.71 3.17 0.57 0.04 1.18 6.49 1.27 0.18 860 33.2 2.31 41.6 0.09 0.01 1000 0.51 3.8 0.43 0.04 0.53 6.57 1.33 0.15 899 34.7 2.42 58.2 0.09 0.01 1250 0.52 4.2 0.47 0.04 0.5 6.87 1.53 0.17 881 34.8 2.42 68.8 0.06 0.01 1500 0.37 5.06 0.49 0.03 0.36 6.69 1.56 0.21 873 33.9 2.36 76 0.03 0.01 Subantarctic Zone station 15 0.06 0.37 0.43 0.04 0.09 4.26 0.77 0.17 111 14.5 1.11 1.3 0.24 0.28 40 0.036 0.24 0.45 0.05 0.1 4.22 0.61 0.18 112 14.5 1.11 1.3 0.23 0.28 70 0.047 0.21 0.54 0.06 0.09 4.13 0.6 0.16 107 14.5 1.11 1.3 0.27 0.28 100 0.035 0.26 0.47 0.06 0.11 4.44 0.65 0.23 232 14.4 1.1 1.4 0.23 0.28 150 0.046 0.35 0.42 0.05 0.15 4.23 0.61 0.15 240 15.7 1.17 3 0.1 0.07 200 0.068 0.45 0.41 0.06 0.1 4.44 0.67 0.22 234 15.6 1.15 3.9 0.14 0.01 300 0.87 0.5 0.49 0.07 0.19 4.56 0.67 0.15 298 16.4 1.21 4.4 0.12 0.01 500 0.13 0.56 0.51 0.07 0.22 5.12 0.79 0.06 526 18.6 1.35 5.7 0.14 0.01 750 0.30 1.5 0.49 0.05 0.23 5.52 0.87 0.13 622 26.2 1.83 16 0.13 0 1000 0.35 2.45 0.44 0.03 0.2 5.78 0.95 0.07 674 31 2.17 30.5 0.12 0 1250 0.41 3.75 0.39 0.04 0.19 6.66 1.16 0.07 807 33.8 2.38 49.6 0.12 0 1500 0.44 4.74 0.50 0.03 0.17 6.79 1.28 0.05 821 34.9 2.46 66 0.08 0 Southern Ocean Time Series Station 2016 15 0.063 0.42 0.25 0.04 ND ND ND ND ND 4.5 0.46 1.3 0.19 0.17
40 0.057 0.25 0.33 0.07 0.27 3.17 0.37 0.3 7 4.6 0.46 1.3 0.17 0.17 Research Freshwater and Marine 70 0.064 0.26 0.33 0.05 0.26 3.1 0.37 0.37 5 4.9 0.48 1.3 0.19 0.18 100 0.21 0.42 0.32 0.04 0.62 2.76 0.4 0.36 65 10.7 0.81 3.5 0.02 0.03 150 0.19 0.45 0.26 0.06 0.55 3.15 0.41 0.41 58 12.3 0.91 4.1 0 0.01 200 0.21 0.33 0.32 0.07 0.55 3.39 0.46 0.43 89 13.5 0.98 4.6 0.03 0.01 300 0.19 0.51 0.21 0.08 0.5 3.59 0.53 0.35 130 14.9 1.08 5.1 0.04 0.01 500 0.22 0.42 0.32 0.11 0.43 3.77 0.55 0.33 186 16.7 1.2 5.8 0.05 0.02 750 0.50 1.14 0.35 0.05 0.64 4.17 0.59 0.19 224 23.5 1.62 13.6 0.02 0 1000 0.57 2.14 0.36 0.05 0.57 5.71 0.86 0.09 567 29 2 28.5 0.02 0.01 1250 0.53 3.43 0.42 0.04 0.33 7.16 0.98 0.08 682 33.3 2.3 48.6 0.03 0 1500 0.56 4.92 0.43 0.04 0.43 7.02 1.45 0.11 714 35 2.43 70.6 0.01 0 Station 2017 15 0.16 0.4 ND 0.73 2.21 0.8 0.24 18 6.5 0.57 0.2 0.15 0.31 40 0.18 0.55 ND 0.38 2.01 0.33 0.25 14 7.2 0.61 0.2 0.13 0.3 359
(Continued) 360 Marine and Freshwater Research M. J. Ellwood et al.
2 Table 2. Particulate trace metal and zinc isotope dataset for samples M) m
NO collected in 2016 and 2017 at the Cold Core Eddy (CCE) station, the ( Subantarctic Zone (SAZ) station and at the Southern Ocean Time Series (SOTS) station 4
M) Note multiple casts are presented for the CCE and SOTS stations. Values for m
NH 66 ( d Zn are given as the mean 2 s.e. for each measurement. Blanks (n ¼ 3) are based filter blanks scaled to the volume of water filtered. ND, not determined M) Si m ( Depth (m) Zn (pM) d66Zn (%) Cu (pM) Cd (pM) P (nM) 4 M) m
PO CCE station ( Profile 1 40 33 0.29 0.04 23.3 7.6 13
3
M) 90 39 0.29 0.04 34 10.7 19.5 m NO ( 150 12 0.32 0.04 13.2 1.7 2.9 250 12 0.44 0.05 15.1 1.5 2.4
) 1 500 14 0.31 0.04 19.9 1.3 2.1 37 Profile 2 Cd 40 33 0.13 0.06 19 3.2 14.1
(nmol kg 90 19 0.22 0.05 13.8 1.8 7.1 150 13 0.16 0.05 13 0.5 3.7
) 250 8 0.49 0.04 12.2 0.6 2.2 1