The Upanishads

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Upanishads 1 The Upanishads The Upanishads are a collection texts of spiritual teachings, inspirational writing, poetry and philosophy where yoga as we might recognise it is first really described. They were written over a long period, approximately 800 - 500 BCE. They were inspired by the inner vision aspect of the Vedas but reflect a shift in approach to spirituality whereby the ritual and sacrifice element of the Vedas became less important, and was even denigrated as unimportant, and meditation and inner exploration started to be emphasised as the source of true knowledge and understanding. This is perhaps a continuation of the strand of meditative inquiry that archeologists and historians speculate existed in the Indus valley civilisation before the more ritual and sacrifice orientated Aryans arrived from the West. An Upanishad is essentially a ‘teaching’ that has its origins in the oral tradition of direct teacher- student transmission. Its literal translation is something like ‘sitting beside the teacher’. During Vedic times, these teachings weren’t as publicly available as they are now and it was necessary to actively seek out a teacher to hear them. The word is also sometimes described as meaning ‘removing ignorance by revealing truth’ or ‘revealing what is hidden’ or even as ‘secret doctrine’ They are not really philosophy in some respects as they are not presented as logical arguments – they are more presented as meditative insight, inquiry and traditional questions and answers designed to help understand the nature of reality and produce a radical shift in perspective. The view expressed is that there is one underlying reality pervading everything as the creative and sustaining source of all life. Philosophically this view of unity and oneness is known as Advaita Vedanta or non- dualism ( Monism in Western philosophy ) . As opposed to dualism which would tend to separate out spirit and matter and/or energy and matter. There are many Upanishads but 10 or 11 main ones that are generally agreed upon as the most important; these are the ones usually collected together in books as representing the essence of the Advaita Vedanta teachings. The flavour of the Upanishads in general is anti-orthodoxy, anti-ritual, anti-intellectual and pro–experiential carrying the message that the truth at the heart of life cannot be known intellectually or through ritual practices but only through direct perception, inner experience and yoga practices. That said, some of the teachings presented are in the form of questions and answers between a student and a teacher, but with the overall intention to illustrate a vision rather than provide an intellectual answer. This represented something of a shift from the Vedic period where much power was with the priests and their knowledge of rituals and sacrifices to a more empowering idea of individual yoga practice and direct perception available to anyone. The Upanishads are the first texts to clearly mention yoga and begin to describe its practice suggesting that some yogic practices that we would recognise today had already been around for some time. Yoga is primarily described as pranayama and meditation. If there was an ancient asana practice it was probably something pretty different to the modern day. 2 There is little obviously systematized yoga instruction in the Upanishads though some of traditional yoga theory is described. The Maitri Upanishad lists what has become known as the six steps path of Yoga, a precursor to the later more clearly systematized eight steps instruction in Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras. In the Taittiriya Upanishad the basic idea of the 5 Koshas (5 bodies) theory is laid out which again is explained more clearly in later hatha yoga texts such as the Hatha Yoga Pradipika. Some of list like and clearly structured yoga/meditation instruction and philosophy as we might more easily recognise it did not really appear in text form until the teaching of the Buddha and Patanjali at a later date. The Advaita Vedanta, non dualist, teachings that are still current today in India and beyond were more fully developed in 800 ACE by Sankara. The core ideas were the same but further insights and explanations from the Buddhist tradition seem to have been included. There are four main styles of expression in the Upanishads: 1. Dialogues with questions and answers. 2. Narration and stories. 3. Similes, metaphors and illustrations. 4. Symbolism. Main ideas, meanings and terms in the Upanishads. The two most central terms in the Upanishads are BRAHMAN and ATMAN. Brahman – translates as something like eternal universal spirit; the underlying force or intelligence behind all of life; whatever it is that is the source or spark of life; truth; love or god. It is essentially the holy grail of philosophers and physicists - ‘the underlying stuff of life’. It is perhaps what the physicists at the Hadron Collider in Switzerland are looking for. Atman- or Self (often represented in English as capital S Self as opposed to small s ‘self’ which is our personality made up from our conditioning). Atman is essentially indistinct from Brahman - it is our own inherent direct connection to Brahman that can only be realised in non-conceptual states of mind. The type of language used to describe it is that it is our own personal connection to truth, our core identity, the centre of our personal spiritual being, perhaps our soul. It is symbolically represented in the Upanishads as a flame living in the heart area; many spiritual traditions speak of the heart as being the seat of our soul or where our essence lies. Some Asian languages have a word meaning heart/mind and meditation is sometimes described as a journey from the head to the heart. In relation to Brahman/Atman a nice analogy comes from T S Elliot and his poem ‘cats’ in which he says all cats have 3 names – one given to them by their owner, one given to them by themselves and one so secret that even the cat herself does not know what it is. In other yogic/Buddhist traditions the same/similar concept is variously described as Purusha (Patanjali ) , Buddha-nature or luminous mind ( Buddhism ) , Rigpa or Clear 3 View (Dzogchen in Tibetan Buddhism) . Aldous Huxley quotes from the Upanishads in his book The Perennial Philosophy , claiming them as part of an underlying common strand running through the world’s spiritual traditions. Characteristics of Atman/Brahman So when we have seen through our conditioning and delusions, and connected with our Atman, are we left with an empty space with no characteristics or a full space with characteristics? The characteristics of Atman/Brahman traditionally described are clear seeing and understanding combined with an all-inclusive unconditional love and compassion, so full in other words. The central point is that Brahman and Atman are one and the same – Brahman is the universal principle and Atman is our personal connection to the universal Neti-neti – literally ‘not this and not that’. This is a very important concept in Indian philosophy generally, and is important in relation to the description of the nature of Brahman. It is often translated as something like ‘not really tangible’ or ‘not fully explainable’. This is important in that it takes away the possibility of the nature of Brahman/Atman being described in a concrete way as some kind of finite entity. The use of neti-neti in relation to Upanishadic concepts means that non-conceptual meditative experiences cannot be placed in overly black and white terms; so no overly entrenched positions can be taken philosophically which tends to remove fundamentalist type attitudes.. (The practice of yoga tends not to produce fundamentalists). This approach has, on the whole, made dialogue and openness a welcome characteristic in this area of Indian culture, spirituality and philosophy with a number of slightly varying viewpoints happily co-existing without too much problem. We can also consider the later approach of the Buddha when it comes to defining the nature of ultimate reality. He had likely been influenced by teachers of Advaita Vedanta on his own journey. He essentially ducked questions asking for definitions of the nature of reality by saying that they were unanswerable and therefore not really worthy of our intellectual time and effort. Perhaps his point was a clever teaching method and essentially a request to stop trying to conceptualise and prove everything and get on with some practice based on what we do know. (We may know some people like this!). Karma and rebirth. Liberation in the future or now? Karma The interconnected, never ending knot of karma. 4 The Upanishads are where the concepts of karma and rebirth appear properly formed for the first time (pre Upanishads the trend was that death meant joining your ancestors). Karma is in essence a cause and effect mechanism operating on many levels including the moral realm – a sophisticated, web-like, holistic process which determines our state of mind/being and creates the filter through which we experience the world and to some extent how the world responds to us. It includes our prior conditioning whether from a previous life and/or the conditions that have come together to form us in this life. In essence positive actions arising out of clear understanding and a positive intention ( i.e. in alignment with how things work/reality/Brahman) produce a positive result, i.e. peace of mind, happiness and a healthy attitude towards life; while a negative action arising out of ignorance/confusion will result in mental suffering, malcontent and a potentially more negative attitude to life. There is both an inner and an outer aspect to the effect of our motivations, thoughts, speech and actions; some outcomes more obviously have a negative or positive effect on our own well-being or state of mind, some on others’ well-being or state of mind; but on closer examination all thought, speech and actions are having an effect in both inner and outer ways.
Recommended publications
  • An Understanding of Maya: the Philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva
    An understanding of Maya: The philosophies of Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva Department of Religion studies Theology University of Pretoria By: John Whitehead 12083802 Supervisor: Dr M Sukdaven 2019 Declaration Declaration of Plagiarism 1. I understand what plagiarism means and I am aware of the university’s policy in this regard. 2. I declare that this Dissertation is my own work. 3. I did not make use of another student’s previous work and I submit this as my own words. 4. I did not allow anyone to copy this work with the intention of presenting it as their own work. I, John Derrick Whitehead hereby declare that the following Dissertation is my own work and that I duly recognized and listed all sources for this study. Date: 3 December 2019 Student number: u12083802 __________________________ 2 Foreword I started my MTh and was unsure of a topic to cover. I knew that Hinduism was the religion I was interested in. Dr. Sukdaven suggested that I embark on the study of the concept of Maya. Although this concept provided a challenge for me and my faith, I wish to thank Dr. Sukdaven for giving me the opportunity to cover such a deep philosophical concept in Hinduism. This concept Maya is deeper than one expects and has broaden and enlightened my mind. Even though this was a difficult theme to cover it did however, give me a clearer understanding of how the world is seen in Hinduism. 3 List of Abbreviations AD Anno Domini BC Before Christ BCE Before Common Era BS Brahmasutra Upanishad BSB Brahmasutra Upanishad with commentary of Sankara BU Brhadaranyaka Upanishad with commentary of Sankara CE Common Era EW Emperical World GB Gitabhasya of Shankara GK Gaudapada Karikas Rg Rig Veda SBH Sribhasya of Ramanuja Svet.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2: Vivekananda and Vedanta Philosophy the Meaning of “Vedanta”
    Lecture 2: Vivekananda and Vedanta Philosophy The meaning of “vedanta” The word vedanta can be split into two: veda and anta and literally means “end of the Vedas”. Veda is derived from the root word vid which means “to know”. ‘Vedanta’ should be taken to mean the distilling of the philosophy of the Vedas and the Upanishads into its essential components. The Himalayan range of Upanishadic thought must be catalogued and classified so that we can comprehend it. Vivekananda’s view of Vedanta Just as the word ‘science’ does not refer to a specific subject, but rather to a method of understanding the physical world, Vivekananda views Vedanta as a method to understand both the internal world of the mind and consciousness and the external world of matter. Thus, Vedanta includes science and all forms of human creative endeavor that represent attempts to comprehend infinity in its manifold forms. Six systems of philosophy Nyaya, vaisesika, Samkhya, yoga, purva mimamsa and Vedanta. These translate as: logical realism, realistic pluralism, evolutionary dualism, disciplined meditation, preliminary interpretation of the Vedas, and synthesis of the Vedas, respectively. The systems correspond to the sutra period ranging from 200 CE to 600 CE. Early 19th century translations by European Indologists such as Max Muller had a Judeo- Christian coloring. The three schools of Vedanta Vedanta itself is divided into three schools: dvaita, visistadvaita, and advaita, corresponding to dualism, qualified dualism and non-dualism. The expansion of these schools belongs to the scholarly period: 600 CE to 1700 CE. The principal exponents of these schools were Shankara (advaita), Ramanuja (visistadvaita), and Madhva (dvaita).
    [Show full text]
  • The Upanishads- an Overview
    The Upanishads- An overview (S.N.Sastri) The word ‘Upanishad’ denotes Brahma-vidya by its derivation. Sri Sankara Bhagavatpada says in his Bhashya on the Kathopanishad that this word is derived by adding the prefixes ‘upa’ (meaning near) and ‘ni’ (with certainty) to the root ‘sad’ which means ‘to destroy’, ‘to reach’, and ‘to loosen’. Thus the meaning of the word ‘Upanishad’ is that it is the knowledge that destroys the seeds of worldly existence such as ignorance in the case of those seekers of liberation who, after becoming free from all desires approach (upa sad) this knowledge. The subject-matter of the upanishads is Brahman, the only Reality. Brihadaaranyaka upanishad, 3. 9. 26 says, “I ask you about Him, the Purusha of the upanishads”. The upanishads are the only source of knowledge about Brahman. The method adopted in Vedanta to impart the knowledge of Brahman is known as the method of superimposition ( adhyaaropa ) and subsequent negation ( apavaada ). In the Bhashya on Br.up.4.4.25 Bhagavatpada says, “The transmigrating self is indeed Brahman. He who knows the self as Brahman which is beyond fear becomes Brahman. This is the purport of the whole upanishad put in a nutshell. It is to bring out this purport that the ideas of creation, maintenance and dissolution of the universe, as well as the ideas of action, its factors and results were superimposed on the Self. Then, by the negation of the superimposed attributes the true nature of Brahman as free from all attributes has been brought out”. This is the method of adhyaaropa and apavaada, superimposition and negation, which is adopted by Vedanta.
    [Show full text]
  • Upanishad Vahinis
    Upanishad Vahini Stream of The Upanishads SATHYA SAI BABA Contents Upanishad Vahini 7 DEAR READER! 8 Preface for this Edition 9 Chapter I. The Upanishads 10 Study the Upanishads for higher spiritual wisdom 10 Develop purity of consciousness, moral awareness, and spiritual discrimination 11 Upanishads are the whisperings of God 11 God is the prophet of the universal spirituality of the Upanishads 13 Chapter II. Isavasya Upanishad 14 The spread of the Vedic wisdom 14 Renunciation is the pathway to liberation 14 Work without the desire for its fruits 15 See the Supreme Self in all beings and all beings in the Self 15 Renunciation leads to self-realization 16 To escape the cycle of birth-death, contemplate on Cosmic Divinity 16 Chapter III. Katha Upanishad 17 Nachiketas seeks everlasting Self-knowledge 17 Yama teaches Nachiketas the Atmic wisdom 18 The highest truth can be realised by all 18 The Atma is beyond the senses 18 Cut the tree of worldly illusion 19 The secret: learn and practise the singular Omkara 20 Chapter IV. Mundaka Upanishad 21 The transcendent and immanent aspects of Supreme Reality 21 Brahman is both the material and the instrumental cause of the world 21 Perform individual duties as well as public service activities 22 Om is the arrow and Brahman the target 22 Brahman is beyond rituals or asceticism 23 Chapter V. Mandukya Upanishad 24 The waking, dream, and sleep states are appearances imposed on the Atma 24 Transcend the mind and senses: Thuriya 24 AUM is the symbol of the Supreme Atmic Principle 24 Brahman is the cause of all causes, never an effect 25 Non-dualism is the Highest Truth 25 Attain the no-mind state with non-attachment and discrimination 26 Transcend all agitations and attachments 26 Cause-effect nexus is delusory ignorance 26 Transcend pulsating consciousness, which is the cause of creation 27 Chapter VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16 INDEX
    By Suresvaracharya Volume 16 INDEX S. No. Title Verse Page No. Destruction of avidya through scriptural 60. 67 – 72 2579 to 2668 knowledge [Verse 65 – 72] Restatement of agency, etc. for the purpose 61. 73 – 77 2683 to 1764 of negation [Verse 73 – 80] [ii] INDEX S. No. Title Page No. II Chapter 3 : Topic 60 to 61 66 Verse 67 2601 67 Verse 68 2606 68 Verse 69 2611 69 Verse 70 2624 70 Verse 71 2656 71 Verse 72 2667 72 Verse 73 2683 73 Verse 74 2698 74 Verse 75 2703 75 Verse 76 2724 76 Verse 77 2747 [iii] Topic 60 to 61 Verse 67 to 77 Verse 67 – Introduction : The removal of this illusion of ignorance takes place through the rise of the right knowledge. [Introduction – Chapter 3 – Verse 67] • Since Moola Avidya is non enquirable, can only work for negating it. Verse 67 : From text such as "You are that Being," which remove the desire for further inquiry, certain knowledge about the inward Self does arise, and this [knowledge] cannot be obtained from other sources. [Chapter 3 – Verse 67] a) Tatu Asi Iti Akinam : • With help of Mahavakyam. • Sad Asi = Tat Tvam Asi. • Tat = Pronoun – That – standing for what? • Tatu = Pure existence, Attributeless, sat. 2601 • Sureshvaracharya replaces Tat by Sat, drops word Tvam because verb Asi is 2nd person – singular. • Tvam – Singular, need not be said. • Subject, understood as you. • Sad Asi = Tat Tvam Asi. b) Sad Asi Iti Adhi Mahavakyam : • For the student, Samyak Jnanam, right knowledge w.r.t. Atma, Pratyag Atma, inner self, Advitiya Jnanam.
    [Show full text]
  • Brahman, Atman and Maya
    Sanatana Dharma The Eternal Way of Life (Hinduism) Brahman, Atman and Maya The Hindu Way of Comprehending Reality and Life Brahman, Atman and Maya u These three terms are essential in understanding the Hindu view of reality. v Brahman—that which gives rise to maya v Atman—what each maya truly is v Maya—appearances of Brahman (all the phenomena in the cosmos) Early Vedic Deities u The Aryan people worship many deities through sacrificial rituals: v Agni—the god of fire v Indra—the god of thunder, a warrior god v Varuna—the god of cosmic order (rita) v Surya—the sun god v Ushas—the goddess of dawn v Rudra—the storm god v Yama—the first mortal to die and become the ruler of the afterworld The Meaning of Sacrificial Rituals u Why worship deities? u During the period of Upanishads, Hindus began to search for the deeper meaning of sacrificial rituals. u Hindus came to realize that presenting offerings to deities and asking favors in return are self-serving. u The focus gradually shifted to the offerings (the sacrificed). u The sacrificed symbolizes forgoing one’s well-being for the sake of the well- being of others. This understanding became the foundation of Hindu spirituality. In the old rites, the patron had passed the burden of death on to others. By accepting his invitation to the sacrificial banquet, the guests had to take responsibility for the death of the animal victim. In the new rite, the sacrificer made himself accountable for the death of the beast.
    [Show full text]
  • Advaita Is Vedanta.Pdf
    1 UNEDITED BOOKLET Advaita Is Vedanta States-Stations-Experiences and Samskaras Nothing is Permanent, Nothing is Temporary There Is No Nothing, There Is No Something There is No Not Nothing There is no separation, There is no Oneness There Is No Me Prior To Emptiness There Is No Me Prior To Form There Is No Me Prior To Or Without Samskaras Nisargadatta Maharaj (Paraphased), You think your thoughts are yours, actually they come from the collective 1 2 DEDICATION To Avadhut Nityananda Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj Baba Prakashananda Maharaj Who devoured the mind and opened the heart Without whose love and grace none of this would have been possible 2 3 “ALL THAT IS HEARD, (or that is about to be read) IS NON-EXISTENT”… SHANKARA 3 4 Advaita Is Vedanta Nisargadatta Maharaj (Paraphased), You think your thoughts are yours, actually they come from the collective Advaita is Vedanta Advaita is Not Two Neti Neti is Not This, Not This Advaita It seems ridiculous to even discuss Advaita as 4 5 Advaita is correctly translated as Not Two. Like many presenters of Advaita language has become extremely sloppy For example we incorrectly refer to Advaita as: The One, The One Substance, Consciousness, The Being, God, Emptiness or as Awareness. Shankara: “All that is heard is non-existent.” None of these words have anything to do with Advaita Advaita means NOT TWO. The words used to describe Advaita All mistakenly represent both states-stations and experiences which lead one to believe that there is such a thing as The One, Consciousness, God The Being Emptiness, One Substance, 5 6 or Awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upanishads Page
    TThhee UUppaanniisshhaaddss Table of Content The Upanishads Page 1. Katha Upanishad 3 2. Isa Upanishad 20 3 Kena Upanishad 23 4. Mundaka Upanishad 28 5. Svetasvatara Upanishad 39 6. Prasna Upanishad 56 7. Mandukya Upanishad 67 8. Aitareya Upanishad 99 9. Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 105 10. Taittiriya Upanishad 203 11. Chhandogya Upanishad 218 Source: "The Upanishads - A New Translation" by Swami Nikhilananda in four volumes 2 Invocation Om. May Brahman protect us both! May Brahman bestow upon us both the fruit of Knowledge! May we both obtain the energy to acquire Knowledge! May what we both study reveal the Truth! May we cherish no ill feeling toward each other! Om. Peace! Peace! Peace! Katha Upanishad Part One Chapter I 1 Vajasravasa, desiring rewards, performed the Visvajit sacrifice, in which he gave away all his property. He had a son named Nachiketa. 2—3 When the gifts were being distributed, faith entered into the heart of Nachiketa, who was still a boy. He said to himself: Joyless, surely, are the worlds to which he goes who gives away cows no longer able to drink, to eat, to give milk, or to calve. 4 He said to his father: Father! To whom will you give me? He said this a second and a third time. Then his father replied: Unto death I will give you. 5 Among many I am the first; or among many I am the middlemost. But certainly I am never the last. What purpose of the King of Death will my father serve today by thus giving me away to him? 6 Nachiketa said: Look back and see how it was with those who came before us and observe how it is with those who are now with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept of Salvation in Hinduism
    HINDUISM AND CONCEPT OF SALVATION {With special reference to The Bhagavad Gita} Tahira Basharat∗ The concept of salvation is present in almost all religions in its own distinct way. The primary purpose of all religions is to provide salvation to their followers and the existence of many different religions indicates that there is a great variety of opinion about what constitutes salvation and the means of achieving it. The term salvation can be meaningfully used in connection with so many religions, however, shows that it distinguishes a notion common to men and women of a wide range of cultural traditions. The monotheistic religions state that barrier between human and God is a sin. The monotheistic religions define salvation as entering a state of eternal communion with God, which means that personhood will not be abolished but perfected. However, they differ greatly on the way one can be saved and on the role Jesus Christ has in it. According to Judaism and Islam, salvation is attained by performing good deeds and following the moral law. According to Christianity this is not enough and the role of Jesus Christ as Savior is essential. Other Eastern religions, such as Buddhism and Taoism, take salvation as an illumination, meaning the discovery of and conformity of oneself with an eternal law that governs existence. Dualistic religions, which state that two opposed forces of good and evil rule our world, see salvation as a return to an initial angelic state, from which humans have fallen into a physical body. Salvation, for the Hindu, can be achieved in one of three ways: the way of works, the way of knowledge, or the way of devotion.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I the Religions of Indian Origin
    Part I The Religions of Indian Origin MRC01 13 6/4/04, 10:46 AM Religions of Indian Origin AFGHANISTAN CHINA Amritsar Kedamath Rishikesh PAKISTAN Badrinath Harappa Hardwar Delhi Indus R. NEPAL Indus Civilization BHUTAN Mohenjo-daro Ayodhya Mathura Lucknow Ganges R. Pushkar Prayag BANGLADESH Benares Gaya Ambaji I N D I A Dakshineshwar Sidphur Bhopal Ahmadabad Jabalpur Jamshedpur Calcutta Dwarka Dakor Pavagadh Raipur Gimar Kadod Nagpur Bhubaneswar Nasik-Tryambak Jagannath Puri Bombay Hyderabad Vishakhapatnam Arabian Sea Panaji Bay of Bengal Tirupati Tiruvannamalai-Kaiahasti Bangalore Madras Mangalore Kanchipuram Pondicherry Calicut Kavaratti Island Madurai Thanjavar Hindu place of pilgrimage Rameswaram Pilgrimage route Major city SRI LANKA The Hindu cultural region 14 MRC01 14 6/4/04, 10:46 AM 1 Hinduism Hinduism The Spirit of Hinduism Through prolonged austerities and devotional practices the sage Narada won the grace of the god Vishnu. The god appeared before him in his hermitage and granted him the fulfillment of a wish. “Show me the magic power of your Maya,” Narada prayed. The god replied, “I will. Come with me,” but with an ambiguous smile on his lips. From the shade of the hermit grove, Vishnu led Narada across a bare stretch of land which blazed like metal under the scorching sun. The two were soon very thirsty. At some distance, in the glaring light, they perceived the thatched roofs of a tiny village. Vishnu asked, “Will you go over there and fetch me some water?” “Certainly, O Lord,” the saint replied, and he made off to the distant group of huts. When Narada reached the hamlet, he knocked at the first door.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Lessons from Advaita Bhavesh a Kinkhabwala
    143 Management Lessons from Advaita Bhavesh A Kinkhabwala Introduction Acharya Shankara is a thorough, outright one. he word ‘Advaita’ is very beautiful. It As indicated by him, whatever is, is Brahman. Tliterally means ‘non-dual’. Dvaita means Brahman itself is totally homogeneous. All dis- ‘dual’ and the prefix ‘a’ negates the exist- tinctions and plurality are deceptive.3 ence of duality so, there is no ‘two’ but, ‘one’. It Dualism, Dvaita; qualified monism, Vish- could be simpler, if we said ‘one’, but then, the ishtadvaita; and Monism, Advaita; are the three next question would be, is there ‘two’; so by say- different fundamental schools of metaphysical ing non-dual, it conveys the clear and firm mes- ideas. They are altogether different stages to the sage of being just one, that is non-dual. final stage of the ultimate Truth, namely,para- Acharya Shankara’s ‘philosophical stand- brahma. They are the steps on the stepping stool point can be tried to be summed up in a sin- of yoga. They are not in any manner conflicting gle word “Advaita”—NonDuality. The objective but, in actuality, they are complementary to one of Advaita is to is to make an individual under- another. These stages are amicably orchestrated in stand his or her fundamental (profound) char- an evaluated arrangement of spiritual experiences. acter with the preeminent realty [sic] “Nirakar Dualism, qualified monism, pure monism—all Brahm” and reality that there is no “two” yet one these come full circle inevitably in the Advaita and only. Advaita shows us to see the substance Vedantic acknowledgement of the Absolute or of oneself in each one and that nobody is sep- the supra-normal trigunatita ananta Brahman.
    [Show full text]
  • Isha Upanishad
    Sri Aurobindo Isha Upanishad THE UPANISHADS BOOK I P ART ONE TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY PUB- LISHED BY SRI AUROBINDO Isha Upanishad 1 ÈÙÀ vÀsyamidaÌ sarvaÌ yat kiÜca jagatyÀÌ jagat, tena tyaktena bhuñjÈthÀ mÀ gÐdhaÕ kasya sviddhanam. All this is for habitation1 by the Lord, whatsoever is individual universe of movement in the universal motion. By that renounced thou shouldst enjoy; lust not after any man's possession. 2 kÓrvanneveha karmÀÍi jijÈviØecchataÌ samÀÕ, evaÌ tvayi nÀnyatheto'sti na karma lipyate nare. Doing verily2 works in this world one should wish to live a hun- dred years. Thus it is in thee and not otherwise than this; action cleaves not to a man.3 1 There are three possible senses of vÀsyam, “to be clothed”, “to be worn as garment” and “to be inhabited”. The first is the ordinarily accepted meaning. Shankara explains it in this significance, that we must lose the sense of this unreal objective universe in the sole perception of the pure Brahman. So explained the first line becomes a contradiction of the whole thought of the Upanishad which teaches the reconciliation, by the perception of essential Unity, of the apparently incompatible opposites, God and the World, Renunciation and Enjoyment, Action and internal Freedom, the One and the Many, Being and its Becomings, the pas- sive divine Impersonality and the active divine Personality, the Knowledge and the Ignorance, the Becoming and the Not-Becoming, Life on earth and beyond and the supreme Immortality. The image is of the world either as a garment or as a dwell- ing-place for the informing and governing Spirit.
    [Show full text]