Global Soil Acidification Impacts on Belowground Processes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Soil Acidification Impacts on Belowground Processes Environmental Research Letters LETTER • OPEN ACCESS Global soil acidification impacts on belowground processes To cite this article: Cheng Meng et al 2019 Environ. Res. Lett. 14 074003 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 182.130.23.18 on 01/07/2019 at 14:07 Environ. Res. Lett. 14 (2019) 074003 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab239c LETTER Global soil acidification impacts on belowground processes OPEN ACCESS Cheng Meng1,2,5 , Dashuan Tian1,5, Hui Zeng2, Zhaolei Li1, Chuixiang Yi3 and Shuli Niu1,4 RECEIVED 1 Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, 2 January 2019 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, People’s Republic of China REVISED 2 Shenzhen Graduate School, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, People’s Republic of China 18 May 2019 3 School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Queens College of the City University of New York, NY 11367, United States of America ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION 4 Department of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of China 22 May 2019 5 These authors contribute equally. PUBLISHED 1 July 2019 E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: acid deposition, soil cations, meta-analysis, soil pH, soil respiration, microbes Original content from this Supplementary material for this article is available online work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of Abstract this work must maintain With continuous nitrogen (N) enrichment and sulfur (S) deposition, soil acidification has accelerated attribution to the author(s) and the title of and become a global environmental issue. However, a full understanding of the general pattern of the work, journal citation fi and DOI. ecosystem belowground processes in response to soil acidi cation due to the impacting factors remains elusive. We conducted a meta-analysis of soil acidification impacts on belowground functions using 304 observations from 49 independent studies, mainly including soil cations, soil nutrient, respiration, root and microbial biomass. Our results show that acid addition significantly reduced soil pH by 0.24 on average, with less pH decrease in forest than non-forest ecosystems. The response ratio of soil pH was positively correlated with site precipitation and temperature, but negatively with initial + + + + + soil pH. Soil base cations (Ca2 ,Mg2 ,Na ) decreased while non-base cations (Al3 ,Fe3 ) increased with soil acidification. Soil respiration, fine root biomass, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen were significantly reduced by 14.7%, 19.1%, 9.6% and 12.1%, respectively, under acid addition. These indicate that soil carbon processes are sensitive to soil acidification. Overall, our meta-analysis suggests a strong negative impact of soil acidification on belowground functions, with the potential to suppress soil carbon emission. It also arouses our attention to the toxic effects of soil ions on terrestrial ecosystems. Introduction cycles and impairs ecosystem function (Stevens et al 2010,Lianget al 2018). Therefore, understanding the Since the mid 20th century, acid rain has become a general patterns of ecosystem processes with acid serious global environmental problem due to rapid deposition across diverse environments will provide industrial development (Blank 1985,Duanet al 2016). valuable knowledge for predicting future ecosystem The main sources of acid and acidifying pollutants are dynamics under global change. To date, however, there sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and has been no systematic global synthesis of acid deposi- ammonia (NH3) emitted from fossil fuel combustion tion impact on ecosystem functions. and agricultural activities (Zhao et al 2009,Yanget al Acid deposition has complex effects on ecosystems, + 2012).ThoughSO2 and NOx emissions have been especially for belowground processes. First, more H 2- - reduced in Europe and North America, they are input to soil along with SO4 and NO3 induced by acid increasing in many developing countries due to coal deposition may directly affect microbial activities + combustion (Gao et al 2018).Soilacidification is a (Kuperman and Edwards 1997). Second, H from acid + natural process, which has been accelerated by increases deposition will compete with base cations (e.g. K , + + in N and S deposition associated with human activities Mg2 ,Ca2 ) for replacement, which increase base (Grieve 2001,Kunhikrishnanet al 2016).Human cation leaching out of soil. This further reduces soil acid accelerated soil acidification alters biogeochemical buffering capacity (Driscoll et al 2003) and nutrient © 2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd Environ. Res. Lett. 14 (2019) 074003 availability (Likens et al 1996). Third, increased soil acid deposition and ecosystem function. The searched acidification with continuous acid deposition has the keywords were: (acid deposition or S deposition or + + + potential to mobilize and release free Al3 and Fe3 to simulated acid rain) AND (soil cations (e.g. Na , + + soil solution. This accumulation of toxic elements in Mg2 ,Ca2 ), soil nutrient (e.g. SOC, STN), soil topsoil may eventually impair root growth and micro- respiration, fine root biomass, microbial biomass). bial activity (Godbold et al 1988,Kochian1995, The following criteria were employed to screen appro- Poschenrieder et al 2008), which will consequently priate studies for analysis: (1) only acid addition reduces soil respiration. experiments in the field were included, with the The rate and form of acid deposition, soil type, treatment duration lasting at least one growing season; environmental factor, and ecosystem type all may reg- (2) The control and acid addition treatments had ulate the effects of acid deposition on soil processes. to experience the same climate and soil condition; Normally, acid deposition rate should be a major fac- (3) examined variables were required to be clearly tor to drive soil acidification (Vanhala et al 1996). Dif- described by their means, sample sizes and standard ferent acid forms, e.g. H2SO4 and HNO3, may also deviation. contribute to the variable impacts of acid deposition To acquire as many observations as possible, we - due to their different adsorption mechanism. NO3 is gathered the data at each peak biomass stage of the adsorbed only through electrostatic attraction, while growing season during all measurement years. If sev- 2- SO4 can be specially adsorbed through ligand eral studies with different vegetation types or environ- exchange, especially in variable charge soils (Curtin mental conditions (i.e. annual temperature or and Syers 1990, Guadalix and Pardo 1991). This spe- precipitation) were reported in an article, each study cial adsorption may lead to a release of hydroxyl ions, was considered to be independent. Table-form data which could neutralize a part of the acids and retard were directly extracted, while graph-form data were soil acidification to some extent. Furthermore, soil obtained by the Engauge Digitizer software (Free Soft- type is a significant contributor to regulating soil ware Foundation, Inc., Boston, MA, USA). If climate acidification response. It is expected that soils with variables could not be obtained from the papers, we different initial pH may go through different acidifica- used the latitude and longitude of each study to extract tion buffering phases (Bowman et al 2008). Soil with these data from a global database (http://worldclim. a lower pH generally experiences greater acid- org/). Soil type data were acquired from the FAO data- weathering, which makes less sensitive to external acid base (http://fao.org/). Finally, a global dataset was input (De Vries et al 1989, Zhu 2017). High precipita- established with 49 independent studies from 45 tion accelerates the leaching of soil cations and further papers (figure S1 is available online at stacks.iop.org/ aggravates acidification (Lapenis et al 2004, Ling et al ERL/14/074003/mmedia). This dataset covered the 2007). Low temperature possibly depresses litter area with latitude range from 23.15 to 69.75° N and decomposition (Oulehle et al 2011, Liang et al 2013), elevation range from 10 to 1200 m. Mean annual leading to litter accumulation and then weakening soil temperature varied from −2 °C to 21.4 °C, and pre- acidification magnitude (Aerts 1997). The influence of cipitation from 130 to 2400 mm. Ecosystems included fi these abiotic and biotic factors in combination nally forest, grassland and peatland, but we sorted them causes different ecosystem response to acid deposi- into two groups for analysis (forest and non-forest). fl tion. It is a challenge but essential to quantify the in u- This is due to the lack of data from grassland and peat- fi ences of those factors on the soil acidi cation impacts land ecosystems. Experimental duration spanned 1 to across different experiments with different application 14 years. rates and acid agents to soils with varying buffering In our dataset, most data were related to below- capacities. ground processes. Response variables included soil ( + + + + + + + Here, we compiled a global dataset 304 observa- cations (K ,Na ,Mg2 ,Ca2 ,Zn2 ,Mn2 ,Al3 , ) + tions from 49 case studies and performed a meta- Fe3 ), soil nutrient (SOC-soil organic C, DOC- analysis to quantify belowground process dynamics in dissolved organic C, STN-soil total N, soil NH , soil fi 4 response to experimental
Recommended publications
  • Artificial Chinampas Soils of Mexico City
    !"#$%&$'()Chinampas)*+$(,)+-) ./0$&+)1$#23)#4/$")5"+6/"#$/,) '78)*'($7$9'#$+7):'9'"8, Suelos artificiales de chinampas de la Ciudad de México: propiedades y riesgos de salinización Solos artificiais da cidade do México - Chinampas: propriedades e riscos de salinização AUTHORS Received: 24.03.2011 Revised: 02.06.2011 Accepted: 24.06.2011 1 Ramos Bello, R. ABSTRACT García Calderón, 1 N.E. !e chinampas agriculture is a traditional land use practice in the Valley of Mexico since Pre-Hispa- nic time. !e chinampas soils were constructed by excavation of lake sediments that resulted in the Ortega Escobar, 2 H.M. creation of a system of islands separated by channels. !e agricultural productivity of these artificial soils was high; also the land use practices included forestry, fish breeding and hunting. Nowadays, 3@ Krasilnikov, P. the chinampas soils are affected by excessive salinity. We studied 10 representative soil profiles in the pavel.krasilnikov@ gmail.com chinampas zone of Mexico City in order to characterize their properties and origin, to provide their classification, and to evaluate soil salinization, vertical distribution of the salts and their chemical composition. !e soils are characterized by a layered structure, uniform dark grey colour, irregular vertical distribution of organic carbon and clay, and high percentage of carbon. Some soils show an @ Corresponding Author increase in organic matter with depth, and other profiles have maximum organic matter content in the surficial layers and in the subsoil. !e dynamics of sedimentation resulted in the decrease in 1 Facultad de Ciencias, organic matter in the upper layers of lacustrine sediments, because of recent increase in erosion rate UNAM, México.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sustainable Approach for Improving Soil Properties and Reducing N2O Emissions Is Possible Through Initial and Repeated Biochar Application
    agronomy Article A Sustainable Approach for Improving Soil Properties and Reducing N2O Emissions Is Possible through Initial and Repeated Biochar Application Ján Horák 1,* , Tatijana Kotuš 1, Lucia Toková 1, Elena Aydın 1 , Dušan Igaz 1 and Vladimír Šimanský 2 1 Department of Biometeorology and Hydrology, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] (T.K.); [email protected] (L.T.); [email protected] (E.A.); [email protected] (D.I.) 2 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Recent findings of changing climate, water scarcity, soil degradation, and greenhouse gas emissions have brought major challenges to sustainable agriculture worldwide. Biochar application to soil proves to be a suitable solution to these problems. Although the literature presents the pros and cons of biochar application, very little information is available on the impact of repeated application. In this study, we evaluate and discuss the effects of initial and reapplied biochar (both in rates of 0, 10, and 20 t ha−1) combined with N fertilization (at doses of 0, 40, and 80 kg ha−1) on soil properties and N O emission from Haplic Luvisol in the temperate climate zone (Slovakia). Results showed that 2 biochar generally improved the soil properties such as soil pH(KCl) (p ≤ 0.05; from acidic towards Citation: Horák, J.; Kotuš, T.; Toková, moderately acidic), soil organic carbon (p ≤ 0.05; an increase from 4% to over 100%), soil water L.; Aydın, E.; Igaz, D.; Šimanský, V.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Four Soil Amendments
    Die Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment Volume 69, Issue 3, 141–153, 2018. 10.2478/boku-2018-0013 ISSN: 0006-5471 online, © De Gruyter, www.degruyter.com/view/j/boku Research Article Sustainable intensification of agricultural production: a review of four soil amendments Nachhaltige Intensivierung der landwirtschaftlichen Produktion: ein Überblick vier verschiedener Bodenzusätze Katharina Maria Keiblinger1,* Rosana Maria Kral2 1 University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Austria, Institute of Soil Research, Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria 2 University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Austria, Centre for Development Research, Peter-Jordan-Straße 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria * Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 22 June 2018, received in revised form: 10 September 2018, accepted: 21 September 2018 Summary Dwindling natural resources, growing population pressure, climate change, and degraded soils threaten agricultural production. In order to feed the growing world population, we have to develop strategies to sustainably intensify current agricultural production while reducing the adverse effects of agriculture. Currently, a number of amendments have come into focus for improving structure and fertility of soils. Zeolites, biochar (BC), lime, and nitrification inhibitors (NIs) are reviewed for their properties. Zeolites and BC share many characteristics, such as a high cation exchange capacity (CEC), high specific surface area, and high porosity. Lime, on the other hand, works above all through its buffering capacity and can improve aggregate stability. Although the latter amend- ments change soil physicochemical characteristics, NIs do not act on soil properties but constrain a chemical/enzymatic reaction directly. These amendments are potential strategies to mitigate ongoing soil degradation and to secure soil fertility, under the global challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps
    ISSN 0532-0488 WORLD SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS 106 World reference base for soil resources 2014 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 Cover photographs (left to right): Ekranic Technosol – Austria (©Erika Michéli) Reductaquic Cryosol – Russia (©Maria Gerasimova) Ferralic Nitisol – Australia (©Ben Harms) Pellic Vertisol – Bulgaria (©Erika Michéli) Albic Podzol – Czech Republic (©Erika Michéli) Hypercalcic Kastanozem – Mexico (©Carlos Cruz Gaistardo) Stagnic Luvisol – South Africa (©Márta Fuchs) Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: SALES AND MARKETING GROUP Information Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (+39) 06 57053360 Web site: http://www.fao.org WORLD SOIL World reference base RESOURCES REPORTS for soil resources 2014 106 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps Update 2015 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2015 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Biochar Application on Nitrogen Leaching, Ammonia Volatilization and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Two Distinct Soils
    Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2017, 17 (2), 515-528 RESEARCH ARTICLE Effects of biochar application on nitrogen leaching, ammonia volatilization and nitrogen use efficiency in two distinct soils Zunqi Liu1,2 Tianyi He1,2 Ting Cao1,2 Tiexing Yang1,2 Jun Meng2*, and Wenfu Chen1,2 1Agronomy College, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China. 2Liaoning Biochar Engineering & Technology Research Centre, Shenyang, China. *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract This study was conducted to determine the effect of biochar application on nitrogen (N) leaching, ammonia (NH3) volatilization, and fertilizer N use efficiency (NUE) in two soils with different properties (loamy and sandy). Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) incubation experiments (with 15N-enriched urea applied) and an N loss simulation study were conducted at biochar application rates of 2% and 4%. The results showed that 15N utilization increased by 8.83–9.06% following the addition of biochar to sandy soil during the first season compared with the control. However, this significant effect was not observed in the loamy soil, in which significantly more urea-N was retained in the soil following biochar application. Furthermore, based on the results of the N leaching and NH3 volatilization experiments, 29.19% and 28.65% NO3-N leaching reductions were induced by 2% and 4% biochar amendments in loamy soil, decreasing the total inorganic N that was leached (NH4+-N plus NO3-N) by 26.46% and 26.82%, respectively. However, although the amount of leached NH4+-N decreased in biochar-amended sandy soil, the cumulative NH3 volatilizations were 14.18–20.05% higher than in the control, and 22.55% more NO3--N was leached from biochar-amended sandy soil, resulting in a negative effect on N retention.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleosols Can Promote Root Growth of Recent Vegetation – a Case Study from the Sandy Soil–Sediment Sequence Rakt, the Netherlands
    SOIL, 2, 537–549, 2016 www.soil-journal.net/2/537/2016/ doi:10.5194/soil-2-537-2016 SOIL © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Paleosols can promote root growth of recent vegetation – a case study from the sandy soil–sediment sequence Rakt, the Netherlands Martina I. Gocke1,2, Fabian Kessler1, Jan M. van Mourik3, Boris Jansen4, and Guido L. B. Wiesenberg1 1Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland 2Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Nussallee 13, 53115 Bonn, Germany 3IBED-Paleoecology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, Amsterdam 1090 GE, the Netherlands 4IBED-Earth Surface Science, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, Amsterdam 1090 GE, the Netherlands Correspondence to: Martina I. Gocke ([email protected]) Received: 3 November 2015 – Published in SOIL Discuss.: 14 December 2015 Accepted: 15 September 2016 – Published: 21 October 2016 Abstract. Soil studies commonly comprise the uppermost meter for tracing, e.g., soil development. However, the maximum rooting depth of various plants significantly exceeds this depth. We hypothesized that deeper parts of the soil, soil parent material and especially paleosols provide beneficial conditions in terms of, e.g., nutrient contents, thus supporting their utilization and exploitation by deep roots. We aimed to decipher the different phases of soil formation in Dutch drift sands and cover sands. The study site is located at Bedafse Bergen (south- eastern Netherlands) in a 200-year-old oak stand. A recent Podzol developed on drift sand covering a Plaggic Anthrosol that was piled up on a relict Podzol on Late Glacial eolian cover sand.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTHROSOLS Profound Changes in Soil Properties (From the Greek, Meaning Soil)
    JRC Soils Atlas 24/6/05 11:32 am Page 28 The soil of Europe The major soil types of Europe Soil with subsurface accumulation of low activity clay Acid soil with a bleached horizon penetrating a clay ACRISOLS minerals and low base saturation (from the Latin, acris, ALBELUVISOLS accumulation horizon (from the Latin, albus, meaning meaning very acid). white and eluere, meaning to wash out). An Acrisol is a highly weathered soil occurring in warm temperate regions and the wetter parts Albeluvisols have an accumulation of clay in the subsoil with an irregular or broken upper of the tropics and subtropics. Acrisols have poor chemical properties, low levels of plant boundary and deep penetrations or ‘tonguing’ of bleached soil material into the illuviation nutrients, high levels of aluminium and high susceptibility to erosion. These conditions are horizon. The typical “albeluvic tongues” are generally the result of freeze-thaw processes in strong limitations for agricultural use. Acrisols are similar to the Red-Yellow Podzolic soil of periglacial conditions and often show a polygonal network in horizontal cuts. Albeluvisols occur Indonesia), Red and Yellow Earths and are related to several subgroups of Alfisols and Ultisols mainly in the moist and cool temperate regions. Also known as Podzoluvisols (FAO), Ortho- (Soil Taxonomy). podzolic soil (Russia) and several suborders of the Alfisols (Soil Taxonomy). Left: Sheet and rill erosion on Left: Albeluvisols develop Acrisols; mostly under forest vegetation; Below: a natural Acrisol profile Below: Albeluvic tongues are exposed by deep gully erosion; clearly visible penetrating the The map shows the location of bleached illuvial horizon; The areas in Europe where Acrisols map shows the location of are the dominant soil type.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Soil Systems on the Basis of Transfer Factors of Radionuclides from Soil to Reference Plants
    IAEA-TECDOC-1497 Classification of soil systems on the basis of transfer factors of radionuclides from soil to reference plants Proceedings of a final research coordination meeting organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture and held in Chania, Crete, 22–26 September 2003 June 2006 IAEA-TECDOC-1497 Classification of soil systems on the basis of transfer factors of radionuclides from soil to reference plants Report of the final research coordination meeting organized by the Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture held in Chania, Crete, 22–26 September 2003 June 2006 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Food and Environmental Protection Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL SYSTEMS ON THE BASIS OF TRANSFER FACTORS OF RADIONUCLIDES FROM SOIL TO REFERENCE PLANTS IAEA, VIENNA, 2006 IAEA-TECDOC-1497 ISBN 92–0–105906–X ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2006 Printed by the IAEA in Austria June 2006 FOREWORD The IAEA Basic Safety Standards for Radiation Protection include the general requirement to keep all doses as low as reasonably achievable, taking account of economic and social considerations, within the overall constraint of individual dose limits. National and Regional authorities have to set release limits for radioactive effluent and also to establish contingency plans to deal with an uncontrolled release following an accident or terrorist activity. It is normal practice to assess radiation doses to man by means of radiological assessment models. In this context the IAEA published (1994), in cooperation with the International Union of Radioecologists (IUR), a Handbook of Parameter Values for the Prediction of Radionuclide Transfer in Temperate Environments to facilitate such calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology of Soils and Landforms in Cultural
    5 Geochronology of Soils and Landforms in Cultural Landscapes on Aeolian Sandy Substrates, Based on Radiocarbon and Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dating (Weert, SE-Netherlands) J.M. van Mourik, A.C. Seijmonsbergen and B. Jansen University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), Netherlands 1. Introduction The landscape of the study area (fig. 1,2) is underlain by coversand, deposited during the Late Glacial of the Weichselian. In the Preboreal, aeolian processes reduced soil formation (Stichting voor Bodemkaratering, 1972) and from the Preboreal to the Atlantic a deciduous climax forest developed (Janssen, 1974). The geomorphology was a coversand landscape, composed of ridges (umbric podzols), coversand plains (gleyic podzols), coversand depressions (histic podzols) and small valleys (gleysols). The area was used by hunting people during the Late Paleolithic and Mesolithic (Nies, 1999). Analysis of the urnfield ‘Boshoverheide’, indicated that the population increased during the Bronze Age between 1000 and 400 BC to a community of several hundreds of people, living from forest grazing, shifting cultivation and trade (Bloemers, 1988). The natural deciduous forests gradually degraded into heath land. The deforestation accelerated soil acidification and affected the hydrology, which is reflected in drying out of ridges and wetting of depressions, promoting the development of histosols and histic podzols. Sustainable productivity on chemically poor sandy substrates required application of organic fertilizers, composed of a mixture of organic litter with animal manure with a very low mineral compound (Van Mourik et al., 2011a), produced in shallow stables (Vera, 2011). The unit plaggic anthrosol on the soil map of 1950 AD identifies the land surface, which was used for plaggen agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthrosols (At)
    ANTHROSOLS (AT) The Reference Soil Group of the Anthrosols comprises soils that were buried or profoundly modified through human activities such as addition of organic materials or household wastes, irrigation or culti- vation. The group includes soils otherwise known as 'Plaggen soils', 'Paddy soils', 'Oasis soils' and 'Ter- ra Preta do Indio'. Definition of Anthrosols Soils having 1 a hortic, irragric, plaggic or terric horizon 50 cm or more thick; or 2 an anthraquic horizon and an underlying hydragric with a combined thickness of 50 cm or more. Common soil units: 1 Units characterizing the surface horizon: Hydragric, Irragric, Terric, Plaggic and Hortic. 2 Units characterizing buried horizon(s) or soil: Gleyic, Spodic, Ferralic, Luvic, Arenic, Regic, Stagnic. Summary description of Anthrosols Connotation: soils with prominent characteristics that result from human activities; from Gr. anthropos, man. Parent material: virtually any soil material, modified by Man through cultivation or addition of mate- rial. Environment: Plaggic Anthrosols are most common in north-west Europe; Hydragric Anthrosols in Southeast and East Asia, and Irragric Anthrosols in the Middle East. Profile development: influence of Man is normally restricted to the surface horizon(s); the horizon dif- ferentiation of a buried soil can still be intact at some depth. Use: European Anthrosols were traditionally grown to winter rye, oats, and barley but are now also planted to forage crops, potatoes and horticultural crops; in places they are used for tree nurseries and pasture. Irragric Anthrosols occur in irrigation areas where they are under cash crops and/or food crops. Hydragric Anthrosols are associated with paddy rice cultivation whereas Hortic Anthrosols are (main- ly) planted to vegetables for home consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazonian Dark Earths in Africa?
    Chapter 13 Amazonian Dark Earths in Africa? J Fairhead and M Leach 13.1 Introduction During the last 20 years, research on Amazonian soils has been central to a com- plete reappraisal of the region’s social and natural history. Patches of dark and highly fertile soils have been found to occur throughout Amazonia, known as Amazonian Dark Earths (ADE) and sometimes distinguished as terra preta (Black Earths) and terra mulata (Brown Earths). The former are usually described as the legacy of the former settlement sites (middens) of pre-Colombian farmers, and the latter as a legacy of their agricultural practices. The ability of these soils to support intensive agriculture has undermined environmentally-determinist views of Amazonian history which until recently asserted that the inherently infertile soils could not support populous settled farming. The importance of ADE is not restricted to their historical significance. First, these soils are sought after by today’s farmers (Woods and McCann 1999; German 2003; Fraser et al., this volume). Second, the development of new techniques to establish them rapidly could help intensify modern farming in Amazonia and beyond. Third, because the secret to these soils is at least partially due to the high proportion of charred carbon they contain, farming technologies based on ADE have the potential to sequester enormous quantities of carbon, suggesting a ‘win- win’ opportunity, improving sustainable agriculture whilst mitigating climate change. Unfolding research concerning the qualities of ADE has, however, been con- fined to Amazonia, or at least the neotropics of South and Central America (e.g. Graham 2006). Sillitoe (2006) has argued that the new research on ADE might offer useful technology to import into Africa and some research has been initiated on biochar technologies in Kenya.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes on the Major Soils of the World
    LECTURE NOTES ON THE GEOGRAPHY, FORMATION, PROPERTIES AND USE OF THE MAJOR SOILS OF THE WORLD P.M. Driessen & R. Dudal (Eds) in Q AGRICULTURAL KATHOLIEKE 1 UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITEIT ^.. WAGENINGEN LEUVEN \^ ivr^ - SI I 82 o ) LU- w*y*'tinge n ökSjuiOTHEEK ÎCANDBOUWUNWERSIIEI^ WAGENINGEN TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION The FAO-Unesco classificationo f soils 3 Diagnostichorizon s anddiagnosti cpropertie s 7 Key toMajo r SoilGrouping s 11 Correlation 14 SET 1. ORGANIC SOILS Major SoilGrouping :HISTOSOL S 19 SET 2. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BYHUMA N INFLUENCES Major SoilGrouping :ANTHROSOL S 35 SET 3. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BYTH E PARENT MATERIAL Major landforms involcani c regions 43 Major SoilGrouping :ANDOSOL S 47 Major landforms inregion swit h sands 55 Major SoilGrouping :ARENOSOL S 59 Major landforms insmectit eregion s 65 Major SoilGrouping :VERTISOL S 67 SET 4. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BYTH E TOPOGRAPHY/PHYSIOGRAPHY Major landforms inalluvia l lowlands 83 Major SoilGroupings :FLUVISOL S 93 (with specialreferenc e toThioni c Soils) GLEYSOLS 105 Major landforms inerodin gupland s 111 Major SoilGroupings :LEPTOSOL S 115 REGOSOLS 119 SET 5. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BYTHEI RLIMITE D AGE Major SoilGrouping : CAMBISOLS 125 SET 6. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BYA WE T (SUB)TROPICAL CLIMATE Major landforrasi ntropica l regions 133 Major SoilGroupings :PLINTHOSOL S 139 FERRALSOLS 147 NITISOLS 157 ACRISOLS 161 ALISOLS 167 LIXISOLS 171 SET 7. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BYA (SEMI-)AR-ID CLIMATE Major landforms inari d regions 177 Major SoilGroupings :SOLONCHAK S 181 SOLONETZ 191 GYPSISOLS 197 CALCISOLS 203 SET 8. MINERAL SOILS CONDITIONED BYA STEPPIC CLIMATE Major landforms instepp e regions 211 Major Soil Groupings:KASTANOZEM S 215 CHERNOZEMS 219 PHAEOZEMS 227 GREYZEMS 231 SET 9.
    [Show full text]