Greater Dublin Drainage Project Irish Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Greater Dublin Drainage Project Irish Water Greater Dublin Drainage Project Irish Water Environmental Impact Assessment Report: Volume 3 Part A of 6 Chapter 9 Biodiversity (Marine) June 2018 Envir onmental Impact Assessment Report: Vol ume 3 Part A of 6 Irish Water Environmental Impact Assessment Report: Volume 3 Part A of 6 Contents 9. Biodiversity (Marine) ................................................................................................................................. 1 9.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 9.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................ 4 9.2.1 Desktop Study ............................................................................................................................................. 4 9.2.2 Field Surveys ............................................................................................................................................... 4 9.2.3 Underwater Noise Modelling ....................................................................................................................... 8 9.2.4 Impact Assessment Methodology ............................................................................................................... 9 9.2.5 Non-Statutory Consultation ....................................................................................................................... 13 9.3 Baseline Environment ............................................................................................................................... 16 9.3.1 Designated Sites for Nature Conservation ................................................................................................ 16 9.3.2 Geomorphology and Seabed Sediments .................................................................................................. 17 9.3.3 Sediment Chemistry .................................................................................................................................. 18 9.3.4 Marine Benthos ......................................................................................................................................... 22 9.3.5 Water Quality Profiling, Sampling and Plankton ....................................................................................... 32 9.3.6 Baldoyle Estuary Walkover ....................................................................................................................... 36 9.3.7 Marine Mammals ....................................................................................................................................... 39 9.3.8 Fish and Shellfish ...................................................................................................................................... 45 9.3.9 Summary Evaluation (Importance) of Key Marine Ecological Receptors and Habitats ............................ 51 9.4 Impact of the Proposed Project – Construction Phase ............................................................................. 53 9.4.1 Construction of the Microtunnelling Compounds Adjacent to the Baldoyle Estuary and Construction Works Upstream of Marine Environment with Potential for Contaminated Runoff ................................... 54 9.4.2 Tunnelling Underneath Baldoyle Bay and Tunnelling Compounds ........................................................... 55 9.4.3 Dredging of Proposed Outfall Pipeline Route (Marine Section) ................................................................ 63 9.4.4 Piling for Tunnel Interface and/or Fibre Optic Cable ................................................................................. 69 9.4.5 Installation of the Proposed Marine Diffuser ............................................................................................. 70 9.5 Impact of the Proposed Project – Operational Phase ............................................................................... 72 9.6 ‘Do Nothing’ Impact ................................................................................................................................... 78 9.7 Mitigation Measures .................................................................................................................................. 78 9.7.1 Construction Phase ................................................................................................................................... 78 9.7.2 Operational Phase ..................................................................................................................................... 82 9.8 Residual Impacts ....................................................................................................................................... 82 9.9 References ................................................................................................................................................ 83 32102902/EIAR/9 ii Environmental Impact Assessment Report: Volume 3 Part A of 6 9. Biodiversity (Marine) This Chapter of the Environmental Impact Assessment provides a characterisation of the receiving environment and an assessment of the impacts of the Proposed Project on estuarine, coastal and marine ecology. The key areas of the Proposed Project boundary which may be particularly sensitive are Baldoyle Bay and Rockabill to Dalkey Island Special Areas of Conservation (SAC). In particular, the sub-littoral reefs close to the proposed outfall pipeline route (marine section) and the presence of designated marine mammals in the waters surrounding the outer end were of concern and have received a significant level of assessment. A large number of estuarine and marine surveys were undertaken between 2012 and 2017. This included a walkover survey over the mudflats, Salicornia and Atlantic salt meadows of the Baldoyle Bay Estuary SAC beneath which the proposed outfall route (marine section) will pass using micro tunnelling. The potential for impact in this area relates to bentonite or air breakout during construction along with possible contamination from runoff from the proposed temporary construction compounds. These possible impacts can be mitigated through a Construction Environmental Management Plan, preventing discharges to the estuary and detailed control of bentonite flow and air pressures where needed. The proposed outfall pipeline route (marine section) area was surveyed using multiple geophysical and benthic surveys between 2012 and 2017. Benthic data shows a diverse population based on sands to the west and mixed sandy gravels to the east at shelf break with no contaminants found in surface or dredge sediment depths. These habitats are not particularly sensitive to construction impacts and no significant impact is predicted. The proposed marine diffuser will be located within Rockabill to Dalkey Island SAC (designated for Reefs at Ireland’s Eye and the harbour porpoise over the greater area). The reefs were assessed in 2015 using camera and divers and these showed a diverse habitat with a naturally high silt content. The Construction Phase presents a minor risk of plume effects during dredging whilst near the proposed marine diffuser location during spring tides, but no mitigation other than monitoring and control of dredging operations is needed to keep this to a negligible impact on this feature. Harbour porpoises were assessed by an extensive monitoring survey between 2015 and 2017 using both acoustic and observational techniques in the vicinity of the Proposed Project. Results showed some of the highest densities recorded in Ireland and moderate levels of activity throughout the year with numbers increasing in late summer. This was coincident with the presence of calves and may be due to seasonally abundant food sources such as sprat, herring and Trisopterus and gadoid species. Numbers then reduced during late spring/early summer which may be associated with an offshore movement of this species before calving. No impacts are expected for dredging operations outside the SAC, but passive acoustic monitoring and marine mammal observations will be carried out to limit proximity during high noise construction operations (i.e. piling). Operations will also be restricted to outside peak population periods to reduce a potential minor impact to a negligible impact within the SAC. Fish surveys showed mostly nursery areas of limited importance but with a few sensitive/important fish species were present. The shellfish fishery is also important commercially but not sensitive ecologically. No impact from construction other than restriction of fishing grounds and loss of habitat at the proposed marine diffuser location are predicted. No operational impacts of the Proposed Project and no predicted significant residual effects upon estuarine, coastal and marine ecological receptors are predicted. 32102902/EIAR/9 Chapter 9 – Page 1 Environmental Impact Assessment Report: Volume 3 Part A of 6 9.1 Introduction This Chapter of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) provides a characterisation of the receiving environment and an assessment of the ecological impacts of the Greater Dublin Drainage Project (hereafter referred to as the Proposed Project) on marine ecology. The marine ecology impact assessment addresses the potential impacts on the benthos (animals living on or within the seafloor), marine mammals, fish, plankton and water
Recommended publications
  • An Ecosystem Model of the North Sea to Support an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management: Description and Parameterisation
    Science Series Technical Report no.142 An ecosystem model of the North Sea to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries management: description and parameterisation S. Mackinson and G. Daskalov Science Series Technical Report no.142 An ecosystem model of the North Sea to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries management: description and parameterisation S. Mackinson and G. Daskalov This report should be cited as: Mackinson, S. and Daskalov, G., 2007. An ecosystem model of the North Sea to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries management: description and parameterisation. Sci. Ser. Tech Rep., Cefas Lowestoft, 142: 196pp. This report represents the views and findings of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders. © Crown copyright, 2008 This publication (excluding the logos) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium for research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject to it being re-used accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the publication specified. This publication is also available at www.Cefas.co.uk For any other use of this material please apply for a Click-Use Licence for core material at www.hmso.gov.uk/copyright/licences/ core/core_licence.htm, or by writing to: HMSO’s Licensing Division St Clements House 2–16 Colegate Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax: 01603 723000 E-mail: [email protected] List of contributors and reviewers Name Affiliation
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum MOLLUSCA
    285 MOLLUSCA: SOLENOGASTRES-POLYPLACOPHORA Phylum MOLLUSCA Class SOLENOGASTRES Family Lepidomeniidae NEMATOMENIA BANYULENSIS (Pruvot, 1891, p. 715, as Dondersia) Occasionally on Lafoea dumosa (R.A.T., S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 42-49 fm., on Lafoea dumosa (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368): Eddystone, 29 fm., 1920 (R.W.): 7, 3, 1 and 1 in 4 hauls N.E. of Eddystone, 1948 (V.F.) Breeding: gonads ripe in Aug. (R.A.T.) Family Neomeniidae NEOMENIA CARINATA Tullberg, 1875, p. 1 One specimen Rame-Eddystone Grounds, 29.12.49 (V.F.) Family Proneomeniidae PRONEOMENIA AGLAOPHENIAE Kovalevsky and Marion [Pruvot, 1891, p. 720] Common on Thecocarpus myriophyllum, generally coiled around the base of the stem of the hydroid (S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 43-49 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 367): S. of Rame Head, 27 fm., 1920 (R.W.): N. of Eddystone, 29.3.33 (A.J.S.) Class POLYPLACOPHORA (=LORICATA) Family Lepidopleuridae LEPIDOPLEURUS ASELLUS (Gmelin) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 407, as Chiton; Matthews, 1953, p. 246] Abundant, 15-30 fm., especially on muddy gravel (S.P.): at 9 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 40-43 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368, as Craspedochilus onyx) SALCOMBE. Common in dredge material (Allen and Todd, 1900, p. 210) LEPIDOPLEURUS, CANCELLATUS (Sowerby) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 410, as Chiton; Matthews. 1953, p. 246] Wembury West Reef, three specimens at E.L.W.S.T. by J. Brady, 28.3.56 (G.M.S.) Family Lepidochitonidae TONICELLA RUBRA (L.) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Aliens in Egyptian Waters. a Checklist of Ascidians of the Suez Canal and the Adjacent Mediterranean Waters
    Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research (2016) xxx, xxx–xxx HOSTED BY National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research http://ees.elsevier.com/ejar www.sciencedirect.com FULL LENGTH ARTICLE Aliens in Egyptian waters. A checklist of ascidians of the Suez Canal and the adjacent Mediterranean waters Y. Halim a, M. Abdel Messeih b,* a Oceanography Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria, Egypt b National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Alexandria, Egypt Received 3 April 2016; revised 21 August 2016; accepted 22 August 2016 KEYWORDS Abstract Checklists of the alien ascidian fauna of Egyptian waters are provided covering the Suez Ascidians; Canal, the adjacent Mediterranean waters and the Gulf of Suez. Enrichment in ascidian species of Mediterranean Sea; the Suez Canal seems to have been on the increase since 1927. The distinctly uneven distribution Erythrean non-indigenous pattern in the Canal appears to be directly related to the ship traffic system. species; Earlier reports on alien ascidian species in the Mediterranean are compared and discussed. Of 65 Suez Canal; species recorded from the Mediterranean waters of Egypt in all, four are Erythrean migrants and Polyclinum constellatum four potentially so. Polyclinum constellatum Savigny, 1816 is a new record for the Mediterranean Sea. Ó 2016 National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries. Hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Introduction 2005 and 2014 to deal with this issue and with other related problems. Ascidians are receiving more and more attention because of Based on an analysis of the literature and on the on-line the invasive ability of some species and the severe damage World Register of Marine Species (www.marinespecies.org/), caused to aquaculture (reviewed in a special issue of Aquatic Shenkar and Swalla (2011) assembled 2815 described ascidian Invasions, January 2009: http://aquatic invasions.net/2009/in- species.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographical Homogeneity in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. II
    Vol. 19: 75–84, 2013 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published online September 4 doi: 10.3354/ab00521 Aquat Biol Biogeographical homogeneity in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. II. Temporal variation in Lebanese bivalve biota Fabio Crocetta1,*, Ghazi Bitar2, Helmut Zibrowius3, Marco Oliverio4 1Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121, Napoli, Italy 2Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon 3Le Corbusier 644, 280 Boulevard Michelet, 13008 Marseille, France 4Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie ‘Charles Darwin’, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185 Roma, Italy ABSTRACT: Lebanon (eastern Mediterranean Sea) is an area of particular biogeographic signifi- cance for studying the structure of eastern Mediterranean marine biodiversity and its recent changes. Based on literature records and original samples, we review here the knowledge of the Lebanese marine bivalve biota, tracing its changes during the last 170 yr. The updated checklist of bivalves of Lebanon yielded a total of 114 species (96 native and 18 alien taxa), accounting for ca. 26.5% of the known Mediterranean Bivalvia and thus representing a particularly poor fauna. Analysis of the 21 taxa historically described on Lebanese material only yielded 2 available names. Records of 24 species are new for the Lebanese fauna, and Lioberus ligneus is also a new record for the Mediterranean Sea. Comparisons between molluscan records by past (before 1950) and modern (after 1950) authors revealed temporal variations and qualitative modifications of the Lebanese bivalve fauna, mostly affected by the introduction of Erythraean species. The rate of recording of new alien species (evaluated in decades) revealed later first local arrivals (after 1900) than those observed for other eastern Mediterranean shores, while the peak in records in conjunc- tion with our samplings (1991 to 2010) emphasizes the need for increased field work to monitor their arrival and establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Qunanitative Evaluation of Morphological Changes During Fusion Events in a Colony of Didemnum Vexillum and of Polycunum Constellatum
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2012 A QUNANITATIVE EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES DURING FUSION EVENTS IN A COLONY OF DIDEMNUM VEXILLUM AND OF POLYCUNUM CONSTELLATUM Andrea Frey University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Frey, Andrea, "A QUNANITATIVE EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES DURING FUSION EVENTS IN A COLONY OF DIDEMNUM VEXILLUM AND OF POLYCUNUM CONSTELLATUM" (2012). Master's Theses and Capstones. 716. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/716 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A QUNANITATIVE EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES DURING FUSION EVENTS IN A COLONY OF DIDEMNUM VEXILLUM AND OF POLYCUNUM CONSTELLATUM BY Andrea Frey BA, Mount Holyoke College, 2005 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources: Environmental Conservation May, 2012 UMI Number: 1518022 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an Updated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Taxonomic Paper Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist Chryssanthi Antoniadou‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou§§, Nicolas Bailly ‡ Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece § Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece Corresponding author: Chryssanthi Antoniadou ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christos Arvanitidis Received: 18 May 2016 | Accepted: 17 Jul 2016 | Published: 01 Nov 2016 Citation: Antoniadou C, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N (2016) Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Abstract Background The checklist of the ascidian fauna (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) of Greece was compiled within the framework of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS), an application of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) aiming to produce a complete checklist of species recorded from Greece. This checklist was constructed by updating an existing one with the inclusion of recently published records. All the reported species from Greek waters were taxonomically revised and cross-checked with the Ascidiacea World Database. New information The updated checklist of the class Ascidiacea of Greece comprises 75 species, classified in 33 genera, 12 families, and 3 orders. In total, 8 species have been added to the previous species list (4 Aplousobranchia, 2 Phlebobranchia, and 2 Stolidobranchia). Aplousobranchia was the most speciose order, followed by Stolidobranchia. Most species belonged to the families Didemnidae, Polyclinidae, Pyuridae, Ascidiidae, and Styelidae; these 4 families comprise 76% of the Greek ascidian species richness. The present effort revealed the limited taxonomic research effort devoted to the ascidian fauna of Greece, © Antoniadou C et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Keys for the Identification of Families and Genera of Atlantic
    Biota Neotropica ISSN: 1676-0611 [email protected] Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Brasil Moreira da Rocha, Rosana; Bastos Zanata, Thais; Moreno, Tatiane Regina Keys for the identification of families and genera of Atlantic shallow water ascidians Biota Neotropica, vol. 12, núm. 1, enero-marzo, 2012, pp. 1-35 Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Campinas, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199123750022 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Keys for the identification of families and genera of Atlantic shallow water ascidians Rocha, R.M. et al. Biota Neotrop. 2012, 12(1): 000-000. On line version of this paper is available from: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v12n1/en/abstract?identification-key+bn01712012012 A versão on-line completa deste artigo está disponível em: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v12n1/pt/abstract?identification-key+bn01712012012 Received/ Recebido em 16/07/2011 - Revised/ Versão reformulada recebida em 13/03/2012 - Accepted/ Publicado em 14/03/2012 ISSN 1676-0603 (on-line) Biota Neotropica is an electronic, peer-reviewed journal edited by the Program BIOTA/FAPESP: The Virtual Institute of Biodiversity. This journal’s aim is to disseminate the results of original research work, associated or not to the program, concerned with characterization, conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity within the Neotropical region. Biota Neotropica é uma revista do Programa BIOTA/FAPESP - O Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade, que publica resultados de pesquisa original, vinculada ou não ao programa, que abordem a temática caracterização, conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade na região Neotropical.
    [Show full text]
  • For Review Only 19 20 21 504 Ampuero D, T
    Page 1 of 39 Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 1 2 3 1 DNA identification and larval morphology provide new evidence on the systematic 4 5 2 position of Ergasticus clouei A. Milne-Edwards, 1882 (Decapoda, Brachyura, 6 7 3 Majoidea) 8 9 10 4 11 1 2 1 3 12 5 Marco-Herrero, Elena , Torres, Asvin P. , Cuesta, José A. , Guerao, Guillermo , Palero, 13 14 6 Ferran 4, & Abelló, Pere 5 15 16 7 17 18 8 1Instituto de CienciasFor Marinas Review de Andalucía (ICMAN-C OnlySIC), Avda. República 19 20 21 9 Saharaui, 2, 11519 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain. 22 2 23 10 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centre Oceanogràfic de les Balears, Moll de Ponent 24 25 11 s/n, 07015 Palma, Spain. 26 27 12 3IRTA, Unitat de Cultius Aqüàtics. Ctra. Poble Nou, Km 5.5, 43540 Sant Carles de la 28 29 30 13 Ràpita, Tarragona, Spain. 31 4 32 14 Unitat Mixta Genòmica i Salut CSISP-UV, Institut Cavanilles Universitat de Valencia, 33 34 15 C/ Catedrático José Beltrán 2, 46980 Paterna, Spain. 35 36 16 5Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 37 38 17 Barcelona, Catalonia. Spain. 39 40 41 18 42 43 19 44 45 20 46 47 21 RUN TITLE: Larval evidence and the systematic position of Ergasticus clouei 48 49 50 22 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society Page 2 of 39 1 2 3 23 ABSTRACT: The morphology of the complete larval stage series of the crab Ergasticus 4 5 24 clouei is described and illustrated based on larvae (zoea I, zoea II and megalopa) 6 7 25 captured from plankton samples taken in Mediterranean waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Torbay Rmcz, Devon Physical Features Surveyed
    Torbay rMCZ, Devon Seasearch Site Surveys 2012 This report summarises the results of surveys carried out in the recommended MCZ by Seasearch divers during 2012. The aim of the surveys was to add detail of the habitats and species found within the area to support the designation process. Particular attention was paid to the Habitat and Species FOCI identified in the Ecological Guidance on the designation of MCZs. Surveys were carried out at a number of sites in all parts of the rMCZ. 1 2 4 3 5 Sites Surveyed 1 Babbacombe 2 Hope’s Cove CW 3 Orestone 6 7 4 Thatcher Gut 8 9 5 Fairy Cove 6 Elberry Cove 7 Fishcombe Cove 8 Brixham Breakwater 10 11 9 Shoalstone Beach 12 10 Cod Rock 11 Sharpham Bay 12 St Mary’s Bay Physical features Surveyed The main features of the area surveyed by Seasearch in 2012 were eelgrass beds (Hopes Cove (2), Thatcher Gut (4), Elberry Cove (6), Fishcombe Cove (7) and Brixham Breakwater Beach (8)), infralittoral rocky reefs (Babbacombe (1), Fairy Cove (5), Shoalstone (9) and St Marys Bay (12)), circalittoral rocky reefs (Orestone (3), Cod Rock (10) and Sharpham Bay (11)) and a variety of sediments from gravel to sandy mud (most sites). All of the sites are already within the Torbay SAC, but a number had not been previously surveyed and the records of eelgrass beds at Hope’s Cove and Thatcher Gut are new, is arCWe the circalittoral rocky reef in Sharpham Bay. CW Features of the Marine Life and Habitats Eeelgrass Beds (Sites 2,4,6,7,8) Eelgrass, Zostera marina, is one of the very few flowering plants underwater and, unlike seaweeds, has a system of roots which can help to bind soft sediments and create a complex habitat in what would otherwise be a relatively un-diverse environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys Species List
    FKNMS Species List A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T 1 Marine and Terrestrial Species of the Florida Keys 2 Phylum Subphylum Class Subclass Order Suborder Infraorder Superfamily Family Scientific Name Common Name Notes 3 1 Porifera (Sponges) Demospongia Dictyoceratida Spongiidae Euryspongia rosea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 4 2 Fasciospongia cerebriformis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 5 3 Hippospongia gossypina Velvet sponge 6 4 Hippospongia lachne Sheepswool sponge 7 5 Oligoceras violacea Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 8 6 Spongia barbara Yellow sponge 9 7 Spongia graminea Glove sponge 10 8 Spongia obscura Grass sponge 11 9 Spongia sterea Wire sponge 12 10 Irciniidae Ircinia campana Vase sponge 13 11 Ircinia felix Stinker sponge 14 12 Ircinia cf. Ramosa species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 15 13 Ircinia strobilina Black-ball sponge 16 14 Smenospongia aurea species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey, Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 17 15 Thorecta horridus recorded from Keys by Wiedenmayer 18 16 Dendroceratida Dysideidae Dysidea etheria species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 19 17 Dysidea fragilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 20 18 Dysidea janiae species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey; Tortugas survey, Wheaton list 21 19 Dysidea variabilis species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 22 20 Verongida Druinellidae Pseudoceratina crassa Branching tube sponge 23 21 Aplysinidae Aplysina archeri species from G.P. Schmahl, BNP survey 24 22 Aplysina cauliformis Row pore rope sponge 25 23 Aplysina fistularis Yellow tube sponge 26 24 Aplysina lacunosa 27 25 Verongula rigida Pitted sponge 28 26 Darwinellidae Aplysilla sulfurea species from G.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapoda, Brachyura
    APLICACIÓN DE TÉCNICAS MORFOLÓGICAS Y MOLECULARES EN LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LA MEGALOPA de Decápodos Braquiuros de la Península Ibérica bérica I enínsula P raquiuros de la raquiuros B ecápodos D de APLICACIÓN DE TÉCNICAS MORFOLÓGICAS Y MOLECULARES EN LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LA MEGALOPA LA DE IDENTIFICACIÓN EN LA Y MOLECULARES MORFOLÓGICAS TÉCNICAS DE APLICACIÓN Herrero - MEGALOPA “big eyes” Leach 1793 Elena Marco Elena Marco-Herrero Programa de Doctorado en Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva Rd. 99/2011 Tesis Doctoral, Valencia 2015 Programa de Doctorado en Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva Rd. 99/2011 APLICACIÓN DE TÉCNICAS MORFOLÓGICAS Y MOLECULARES EN LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE LA MEGALOPA DE DECÁPODOS BRAQUIUROS DE LA PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA TESIS DOCTORAL Elena Marco-Herrero Valencia, septiembre 2015 Directores José Antonio Cuesta Mariscal / Ferran Palero Pastor Tutor Álvaro Peña Cantero Als naninets AGRADECIMIENTOS-AGRAÏMENTS Colaboración y ayuda prestada por diferentes instituciones: - Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (actual Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) por la concesión de una Beca de Formación de Personal Investigador FPI (BES-2010- 033297) en el marco del proyecto: Aplicación de técnicas morfológicas y moleculares en la identificación de estados larvarios planctónicos de decápodos braquiuros ibéricos (CGL2009-11225) - Departamento de Ecología y Gestión Costera del Instituto de Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía (ICMAN-CSIC) - Club Náutico del Puerto de Santa María - Centro Andaluz de Ciencias y Tecnologías Marinas (CACYTMAR) - Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO), Centros de Mallorca y Cádiz - Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) de Barcelona - Institut de Recerca i Tecnología Agroalimentàries (IRTA) de Tarragona - Centre d’Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB) de Girona - Universidad de Málaga - Natural History Museum of London - Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn di Napoli (SZN) - Universitat de Barcelona AGRAÏSC – AGRADEZCO En primer lugar quisiera agradecer a mis directores, el Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the British Stalk-Eyed Crustacea
    Go ygle Acerca de este libro Esta es una copia digital de un libro que, durante generaciones, se ha conservado en las estanterias de una biblioteca, hasta que Google ha decidido escanearlo como parte de un proyecto que pretende que sea posible descubrir en linea libros de todo el mundo. Ha sobrevivido tantos anos como para que los derechos de autor hayan expirado y el libro pase a ser de dominio publico. El que un libro sea de dominio publico significa que nunca ha estado protegido por derechos de autor, o bien que el periodo legal de estos derechos ya ha expirado. Es posible que una misma obra sea de dominio publico en unos paises y, sin embargo, no lo sea en otros. Los libros de dominio publico son nuestras puertas hacia el pasado, suponen un patrimonio historico, cultural y de conocimientos que, a menudo, resulta dificil de descubrir. Todas las anotaciones, marcas y otras senales en los margenes que esten presentes en el volumen original apareceran tambien en este archivo como testimonio del largo viaje que el libro ha recorrido desde el editor hasta la biblioteca y, finalmente, hasta usted. Normas de uso Google se enorgullece de poder colaborar con distintas bibliotecas para digitalizar los materiales de dominio publico a fin de hacerlos accesibles a todo el mundo. Los libros de dominio publico son patrimonio de todos, nosotros somos sus humildes guardianes. No obstante, se trata de un trabajo caro. Por este motivo, y para poder ofrecer este recurso, hemos tornado medidas para evitar que se produzca un abuso por parte de terceros con fines comerciales, y hemos incluido restricciones tecnicas sobre las solicitudes automatizadas.
    [Show full text]