Xeriscaping in Central Oregon.Pub

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Xeriscaping in Central Oregon.Pub Xeriscaping in Central & Eastern Oregon by Amy Jo Detweiler, Horticulture Faculty for Central Oregon Whether you are an experienced gardener or a newcomer to the high desert, learning how to suc- cessfully garden here can be an exciting challenge. If given the choice, most of us would choose the beauty of a lush green landscape to one full of rocks and sagebrush; but is that possible in this kind of envi- ronment, providing plants with enough moisture, while conserving water, one of our most precious commodities? It is with xeriscaping, a new gardening trend that combines contemporary conservation techniques with the best elements of traditional landscaping. Not only is it possible to have a colorful and beautiful landscape while con- serving water, but you can also conserve valuable commodities such as energy, time, and money. Below is a list of plants that work well in a water-wise garden. These plants tend to use less water and are more drought toler- ant than other ornamental plants. Jul 2006 Ornamental Trees Shade Trees Common Name Botanical Name Common Name Botanical Name Alder, Mountain or Thinleaf Alnus tenuifolia Ash, Green Fraxinus pennsylvanica Apricot Prunus armeniaca Ash, ‘Autumn Purple’ Fraxinus americana Aspen, Quaking Populus tremuloides Catalpa, Western or Catalpa speciosa Northern Buckeye, Ohio Aesulus glabra Hackberry, Common Celtis occidentalis Chokecherry, Amur Prunus maackii Honeylocust, Thornless Gleditsia tricanthos var. Chokecherry, Canada Red Prunus virginiana inermis cvs. ‘Schubert’ Kentucky Coffeetree Gymnocladus dioicus Crabapple, Flowering Malus hybrids Linden, American Tilia americana Goldenrain Tree Koelreuteria paniculata Linden, Littleleaf Tilia cordata ‘Greenspire’ Hawthorn, English ‘Paul’s Craegus laevigata ‘Paul’s ‘Greenspire’ Scarlet’ Scarlet’ Maple, ‘Autumn Blaze’ Acer x fremanii ‘Autumn Hawthorn, Russian Crataegus ambigua Blaze’ Hawthorn, Washington Crataegus phaenopyrum Maple, Norway Acer platanoides Hawthorn, Winter King Crataegus viridis ‘Winter Oak, Bur or Mossycup Quercus macrocarpa King’ Hornbeam, American Carpinus caroliniana Evergreen Trees Lilac, Japanese Tree ‘Ivory Syringa reticulata ‘Ivory Silk’ Silk’ Common Name Botanical Name Maple, Amur Acer ginnala Cedar, Easter Red Juniperus virginiana Maple, Bigtooth (Canyon or Acer grandidentatum Juniper species Juniperus species Wasatch) Juniper, Blue Star Juniperus squamata Maple, Tatarian Acer tataricum ‘Blue Star’ Maple, Rocky Mountain Acer glabrum Juniper, Chinese Juniperus chinensis Mayday Tree (European Prunus padus Juniper, Creeping Juniperus horizontalis Bird Cherry) Juniper, Savin Juniperus sabina Olive, Russian Elaeagnus angustifolia Juniper, Rocky Mountain Juniperus scopulorum Pear, Ussarian Pyrus ussuriensis Juniper, Western or Juniperus occidentalis Serviceberry, Saskatoon Amelanchier alnifolia Sierra Evergreen Trees (con’t) Fruits & Berries Common Name Botanical Name Common Name Botanical Name Juniper, Western or Juniperus occidentalis Apple Malus hybrids Sierra Cherry Prunus spp. Pine, Austrian Pinus nigra Currant Ribes spp. Pine, Bristlecone Pinus aristata Grape Vitus lambruscak cvs. Pine, Limber Pinus flexilis Peach Prunus persica cvs. Pine, Pinyon Pinus edulis Pear Pyrus communis Pine, Ponderosa or West- Pinus ponderosa Plum Prunus cvs. ern Yellow Raspberry Rubus cvs. Pine, Lodgepole Pinus contorta latifolia Rhubarb Rheam rhabarbarum cvs. Pine, Mugo or Swiss Pinus mugo Mountain Strawberry Fragaria ananassis cvs. Spruce, Colorado Picea pungens Spruce, Colorado Blue Picea pungens var. glauca Broadleaf Evergreens Small Shrubs 1-4’ Common Name Botanical Name Common Name Botanical Name Grape Holly, Oregon Mahonia aquifolium Coralberry, Hancock Symphoricarpos x chenaul- tii ‘Hancock’ Holly, Creeping Mahonia repens Coralberry, Indian Symphoricarpos orbicula- Kinnickinnick Arctostaphylos uvar-ursi Currant tus Mazanita, Greenleaf Arctostaphylos patula Cotoneaster, Cranberry Cotoneaster apiculatus Mountain Mahogany, Curl- Cercocarpus ledifolium Cotoneaster, Rock Cotoneaster horizontalis Leaf Currant Alpine Ribes alpinum Yucca Yucca species Fernbush Chamaebatiaria millefol- lium Leadplant Amorpha canescens Peashrub, Pygmy Caragana pygmaea Potentilla or Cinquefoil Potentilla fruticosa Vines Rabbitbrush, Gray Chrysothamnus nauseosus Sage, Russian Perovskia atriplicfolia Common Name Botanical Name Sage Silver Artemesia cana Clematis Clematis species Spirea, Blue Mist or Blue- Caryopteris x clandonensis Clematis, Yellow lantern Clematis tanguitica beard Silver Lace Vine Polygonum aubertii Spirea Spiraea species Trumpet Vine Campsis radicans Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus Virginia Creeper Pathenocissus quinquefolia Sumac, Gro-Low Rhus aromatica 2 Medium Shrubs 4-8’ Large Shrubs (Con’t) Common Name Botanical Name Common Name Botanical Name Apache Plume Fallugia paradoxa Sagebrush Artemisia tridentata or Seriphidium tridentate Barberry Berberis species Serviceberry, Saskatoon Amelanchier alnifolia Bitterbrush Purshia tridentata Burning Bush Euonymus alatus Sumac, Smooth Rhus glabra ‘Compactus’ Current, Golden Ribes aureum Sumac, Staghorn Rhus typhina Plum, Cistena or Purpleleaf Prunus x cistena Viburnum, Nannyberry Viburnum lentago Sandcherry Viburnum, Wayfaring Tree Viburnum lantana Rose, Hardy Shrub Rosa species Sandcherry, Western Prunus besseyi Spirea, Vanhoutte Spiraea x vanhouttei Thimbleberry or Boulder Rubus deliciousus Raspberry Viburnum, Compact Virburnum trilobum American Cranberry ‘Compactum’ Large Shrubs 8’+ Ornamental Grasses Common Name Botanical Name Beautybush Kolkwitzia amabilis Common Name Botanical Name Buckthorn, Columnar or Rhamnus frangula Avena, Blue or Blue Oat Helictotrichon semper- Tallhedge ‘Columnaris’ Grass virens Buckthorn, Fernleaf Rhamnus fragula Bluestem, Big Andropogon gerardi ‘Asplenifolia’ Bluestem, Little Schizachyrium scoparium Buffaloberry, Silver Spheherdia argentea Feather Reed Grass, Karl Calamagrostis acutiflora Cherry, Nanking Prunus tomentosa Foerster Cotoneaster, Hedge Cotoneaster lucidus Fescue, Blue Festuca ovina glauca Forsythia Forsythia cultivars Fountain Grass Pennisetum alopecuroides Honeysuckle, Arnold Red Lonicera tatarica ‘Arnold Indian Grass Sorghastrum nutans Red’ Miscanthus Grass or Miscanthus sinensis Lilac, Common or French Syringa vulgaris Maiden Hair Grass lilac Switch Grass ‘Heavy Metal’ Panicum virgatum ‘Heavy Mockorange, Littleleaf Philadelphus microphyllus Metal’ Ninebark Physocarpus species Peashrub, Siberian Caragana arborescens Privet, Cheyenne Ligustrum vulgare ‘Cheyenne’ Privet, New Mexico or Forestiera neomexicana Desert Olive 3 Ground Covers 1-12” Perennials Common Name Botanical Name Common Name Botanical Name Bugleweed or Carpet Ajuga species Artemesia or Wormwood Artemesia species Bugle Baby’s Breath Gysophila paniculata Candytuft Iberis sempervirens Balloon Flower Platycodon grandiflora Dianthus, Garden Carna- Dianthus species tion, or Pinks Basket-of-Gold Aurinia saxatile Hardy Cactus Cactaceae Family Bellflower Campanula species Hens and Chicks Sempervivum species Black-eyed Susan Rudbeckia species Himalayan Fleeceflower or Polgonum affine Blanket Flower Gaillardia varieties Border Jewel Catmint Nepeta species Iceplant, Purple Delosperma cooperi Columbine Aquilegia species Iceplant, Yellow Delosperma nubigenum Coneflower Echinacea purpurea Mount Atlas Daisy or Mat Anacyclus depressus Coralbells Heuchera sanguinea Daisy Coreopsis or Tickseed Coreopsis species Mountain Gold Alyssum montanum Cranesbill Geranium varieties Penstemon, Pineleaf Penstemon pinifolius Daylily Hemerocallis species Periwinkle Vinca major varieties Delphinium Delphinium varieties Phlox, Creeping or Moss Phlox subulata Double Bubble Mint or Agastache cana Poppy Mallow or Prairie Callirhoe involucrata Mountain Mint Winecup Daisy, Painted Tanacetum coccineum Potentilla, Creeping Potentilla verna-nana Daisy, Shasta Leucanthemum x super- Primrose, Mexican Evening Oenothera berlandieri bum ‘Siskiyou’ Fireweed Epilobium angustifolium Pussytoes or Cat’s Ears Antennaria species Flax, Blue Linum perenne Rock Cress Aubrieta deltoidea Sea Thrift Armeria maritima Foxglove Digitalis varieties Snow-in-Summer Cerastium tomentosum Globe Thistle Echinops ritro Goldenrod Solidago species Speedwell Veronica species Heartleaf Bergenia Bergenia cordifolia Stonecrop Sedum species Hollyhock Alcea rosea Sulfur Flower Eriogonum umbellatum Hosta Lily Hosta species Sweet Woodruff or Galium ordoratum Bedstraw Iris, Tall Bearded Iris hybrids Thyme Thymus species Jupiter’s Beard or Valerian Centranthus ruber Thyme, Woolly Thymus pseudolanugino- Knautia Knautia macedonia sus Ozark Sundrops Oenothera missouriensis White Rock Cress Arabis species Penstemon or Beard- Penstemon species Yarrow, Woolly Achillea tomentosa tongue 4 Perennials (Con’t) Common Name Botanical Name Phlox, Tall Garden Phlox paniculata varieties Pincushion Flower Scabiosa species Poppy, Oriental Papaver orientale Prairie Coneflower or Ratibida columnifera Mexican Hat Rose Campion Lychnis coronaria Salvia or Sage Salvia species Sea Lavender Limonium latifolium Sedum, Tall Sedum species Torch Lily or Red-hot Kniphofia uvaria Poker Yarrow Achillea species For more gardening information, check out our website below. OSU/Deschutes Co Extension Service 3893 SW Airport Way Redmond OR 97756 541.548.6088 Http://extension.oregonstate.edu/deschutes 5 .
Recommended publications
  • Forests of Eastern Oregon: an Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann
    Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann United States Forest Pacific Northwest General Tecnical Report Department of Service Research Station PNW-GTR-578 Agriculture April 2003 Revised 2004 Joseph area, eastern Oregon. Photo by Tom Iraci Authors Sally Campbell is a biological scientist, Dave Azuma is a research forester, and Dale Weyermann is geographic information system manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 SW Main, Portland, OR 97205. Cover: Aspen, Umatilla National Forest. Photo by Tom Iraci Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR April 2003 State Forester’s Welcome Dear Reader: The Oregon Department of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service invite you to read this overview of eastern Oregon forests, which provides highlights from recent forest inventories.This publication has been made possible by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program, with support from the Oregon Department of Forestry. This report was developed from data gathered by the FIA in eastern Oregon’s forests in 1998 and 1999, and has been supplemented by inventories from Oregon’s national forests between 1993 and 1996.This report and other analyses of FIA inventory data will be extremely useful as we evaluate fire management strategies, opportunities for improving rural economies, and other elements of forest management in eastern Oregon.We greatly appreciate FIA’s willingness to work with the researchers, analysts, policymakers, and the general public to collect, analyze, and distrib- ute information about Oregon’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Media Kit
    2019 MEDIA KIT 2019 MEDIA KIT MAILING ADDRESS 541.948.5200 Oregon Media [email protected] 70 SW Century Drive WWW.OREGON-MEDIA.COM Suite 100-474 Bend, Oregon 97702 2019 MEDIA KIT reach The official Central Oregon Visitors Guide is the region’s most widely circulated promotional publication, reaching more than 402,500 readers through a $2.5 million, nationwide marketing campaign and exclusive placement in resorts and destinations throughout Central Oregon. Distribution • 115,000 distributed annually. Exclusive collateral piece of COVA’s annual marketing, promotion, sales and public relations Of f icial • campaigns. • Travel Oregon’s official fulfillment piece for any inquiry into Central Oregon. VISITORS Placed exclusively in more than 4,000 resort units, hotel rooms, vacation homes, condominiums GUIDE • and bed-and-breakfasts throughout Central Oregon. Sent to more than 90 visitor centers, chambers and state welcome centers, more than 40 AAA • offices throughout Oregon-Washington-Idaho, Nevada, California and Texas. CROOKED RIVER RANCH · LA PINE · MADRAS Available at both the Redmond Airport and Portland International Airport. · MAUPIN · PRINEVILLE • · REDMOND · SISTERS Showcased in all COVA press kits provided to travel editors and at all industry and consumer · WARM SPRINGS • travel shows and sales events. The COVA website VisitCentralOregon.com is receiving nearly 1 million unique visitor • views annually and features a digital version of the COVA guide with links to each partner stakeholder and advertiser. MAILING ADDRESS 541.948.5200 Oregon Media [email protected] 70 SW Century Drive WWW.OREGON-MEDIA.COM Suite 100-474 Bend, Oregon 97702 2019 MEDIA KIT audience By profiling a perfect combination of adventurous recreation opportunities and wonderful retreats, the official Central Oregon Visitors Guide impacts local and out-of-town readers who enjoy a diverse range of lifestyles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR
    The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit 2018 Linking Collaboration Efforts to Build a Best Harney County High Desert Partnership’s Mission Summit Vision The High Desert Partnership exists to cultivate collaboration and We believe this summit will provide a productive time for those support and strengthen diverse partners engaged in solving participating in collaborative work in Harney County to network, complex issues to advance healthy ecosystems, economic well- learn and look for opportunities to work together. Bringing together being and social vitality to ensure a thriving and resilient the collaborative initiatives will create synergy and the story of community. collaboration will reverberate in our community. The outcomes from this summit will lead to more resilient communities. Our Core Values o We believe in our collaborative process to address societal Goals of the Summit issues. o Increase the understanding of collaborative efforts in Harney o We believe in doing things right rather than right now. County. o We believe in recognizing the values of others. o Understand the links where initiatives can work together on o We believe in advocating for the process, not for outcomes. projects or programs. o We believe in taking a holistic approach: social, ecological and o Find the places for sharing resources. economic. o Grow the community's collaborative participation. o We believe that optimism is necessary to successfully address o Provide a venue for those in attendance to gain a better the challenges we face. understanding of the work of High Desert Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Deschutes County Historical Highlights
    Deschutes County Historical Highlights First white men to enter Central Oregon: Reed and Seton from the 1813 American Pacific Fur Company. Fremont Exploration: lead by John C. Fremont and his party which 1843 included Kit Carson, Thomas "Bad hand" Fitzpatrick, and Billy Chinnook. 1848 Oregon Territory created. Clark Party camps on the bank of the Deschutes River near the future 1851 townsite of Bend. 1859 Oregon gains Statehood. Felix Scott Jr., Marion Scott, John Craig and Robert Millican bring 900 1862 head of Cattle into Central Oregon and spend the winter here. Reputed to be the first white men to do so. William P. Vandvert settles on the Deschutes River south of present site of 1874 Sunriver. 1877 Farewell Bend Ranch established by John Y. Todd. 1878 Tetherow Crossing built (oldest home standing in Deschutes County). 1882 Crook County formed from Wasco County. 1886 Post Office established at Farewell Bend Ranch by John Sisemore. Passage of Carey Act which allow free land to those who irrigate it, opens 1894 the high desert to development. Columbia Southern Railroad reaches the City of Shaniko. 1900 Alexander M. Drake arrives in the future town of Bend. City of Sisters platted. 1901 Construction begins on Pilot Butte Canal. Name of post office changed temporally from "Bend" to "Deschutes" 1902 Millard Triplett constructs Bend’s first frame building. 1903 Bend population reaches approximately 250 people. Tumalo platted as Laidlaw. 1904 Water turned on in the Pilot Butte Canal. First phone lines laid between Bend and Prineville. City of Redmond platted. 1905 City of Bend officially incorporated with 500 people (104 votes in favor - 3 in opposition).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical and Current Forest and Range Landscapes in the Interior
    United States Department of Historical and Current Forest Agriculture Forest Service and Range Landscapes in the Pacific Northwest Research Station United States Interior Columbia River Basin Department of the Interior and Portions of the Klamath Bureau of Land Management General Technical and Great Basins Report PNW-GTR-458 September 1999 Part 1: Linking Vegetation Patterns and Landscape Vulnerability to Potential Insect and Pathogen Disturbances Authors PAUL F. HESSBURG is a research plant pathologist and R. BRION SALTER is a GIS analyst, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 1133 N. Western Avenue, Wenatchee, WA 98801; BRADLEY G. SMITH is a quantitative ecologist, Pacific Northwest Region, Deschutes National Forest, 1645 Highway 20 E., Bend, OR 97701; SCOTT D. KREITER is a GIS analyst, Wenatchee, WA; CRAIG A. MILLER is a geographer, Wenatchee, WA; CECILIA H. McNICOLL was a plant ecol- ogist, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, and is currently at Pike and San Isabel National Forests, Leadville Ranger District, Leadville, CO 80461; and WENDEL J. HANN was the regional ecologist, Northern Region, Intermountain Fire Sciences Laboratory, and is currently the National Landscape Ecologist stationed at White River National Forest, Dillon Ranger District, Silverthorne, CO 80498. Historical and Current Forest and Range Landscapes in the Interior Columbia River Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins Part 1: Linking Vegetation Patterns and Landscape Vulnerability to Potential Insect and Pathogen Disturbances Paul F. Hessburg, Bradley G. Smith, Scott D. Kreiter, Craig A. Miller, R. Brion Salter, Cecilia H. McNicoll, and Wendel J. Hann Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project: Scientific Assessment Thomas M.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analyses of Juniperus Species in Turkey and Their Relations with Other Juniperus Based on Cpdna Supervisor: Prof
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY APRIL 2015 Approval of the thesis MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA submitted by AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Orhan Adalı Head of the Department, Biological Sciences Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Supervisor, Dept. of Biological Sciences METU Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Musa Doğan Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof.Dr. Hayri Duman Biology Dept., Gazi University Prof. Dr. İrfan Kandemir Biology Dept., Ankara University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sertaç Önde Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Date: iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Aysun Demet GÜVENDİREN Signature : iv ABSTRACT MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA Güvendiren, Aysun Demet Ph.D., Department of Biological Sciences Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Morphogenesis of the Seed Cones of the Cupressaceae - Part II Cupressoideae
    1 2 Bull. CCP 4 (2): 51-78. (10.2015) A. Jagel & V.M. Dörken Morphology and morphogenesis of the seed cones of the Cupressaceae - part II Cupressoideae Summary The cone morphology of the Cupressoideae genera Calocedrus, Thuja, Thujopsis, Chamaecyparis, Fokienia, Platycladus, Microbiota, Tetraclinis, Cupressus and Juniperus are presented in young stages, at pollination time as well as at maturity. Typical cone diagrams were drawn for each genus. In contrast to the taxodiaceous Cupressaceae, in Cupressoideae outgrowths of the seed-scale do not exist; the seed scale is completely reduced to the ovules, inserted in the axil of the cone scale. The cone scale represents the bract scale and is not a bract- /seed scale complex as is often postulated. Especially within the strongly derived groups of the Cupressoideae an increased number of ovules and the appearance of more than one row of ovules occurs. The ovules in a row develop centripetally. Each row represents one of ascending accessory shoots. Within a cone the ovules develop from proximal to distal. Within the Cupressoideae a distinct tendency can be observed shifting the fertile zone in distal parts of the cone by reducing sterile elements. In some of the most derived taxa the ovules are no longer (only) inserted axillary, but (additionally) terminal at the end of the cone axis or they alternate to the terminal cone scales (Microbiota, Tetraclinis, Juniperus). Such non-axillary ovules could be regarded as derived from axillary ones (Microbiota) or they develop directly from the apical meristem and represent elements of a terminal short-shoot (Tetraclinis, Juniperus).
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Conservation Partnership Program Investing in Idaho
    Regional Conservation Partnership Program Investing in Idaho Regional Conservation Partnership Program Created by the 2014 Farm Bill, the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) is a partner- Idaho Projects to driven, locally-led approach to conservation. It offers new opportunities for USDA’s Natural Resources Date Conservation Service (NRCS) to harness innovation, welcome new partners to the conservation mission, and demonstrates the value and efficacy of voluntary, private lands conservation. Projects by Resource Concern In 2017, NRCS is investing up to $225 million in 88 projects that impact nearly every state in the nation, including three in Idaho. Since 2014, NRCS has invested more than $825 million in 286 high- 3 3 impact projects, bringing together more than 2,000 conservation partners who have invested an additional $1.4 billion. By 2018, NRCS and partners will have invested at least $2.4 billion. These projects are leading to cleaner and more abundant water, better soil and air quality, enhance wildlife habitat, more resilient and productive agricultural lands and stronger rural economies. 4 Water Quantity/Drought Water Quality Wildlife Habitat 10 Projects $26.3 million NRCS Investment 93 Partners Idaho RCPP Projects Existing RCPP Projects Year Title Funding Lead Partner Number of NRCS Pool Partners Investment 2016 Farmer's Cooperative Ditch Company Project State Farmer’s Cooperative Ditch 7 $500,000 Company 2016 Greater Spokane River Watershed National Spokane Conservation 21 $7.7 million Implementation District 2016
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Review Report
    BEND CITY GOVERNANCE COMMUNITY OPINIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON CHARTER REVIEW —Feb. 1, 2017— For more information contact: Bend 2030 Executive Director Erin Foote Morgan 541-420-8603 [email protected] Bend Chamber of Commerce Executive Vice President for Community Affairs Jamie Christman 541-382-3221 [email protected] City Club of Central Oregon Executive Director Joey Drucker 541-633-7163 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 3 Report Overview 4 Forum One: The Issues 5 Forum Two: Public Input 10 Interactive posters 11 Free responses 15 Post-it Note exercises 21 Appendix Elected mayor comparisons across Oregon 22 Ward system comparisons across Oregon 23 Council pay and audit policies across Oregon 24 History of Bend governance structure 25 Citizen presentation to Bend City Council 26 COAR letter of support for charter review committee 40 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The 2017-2019 Bend City Council Casey Roats, Mayor Barb Campbell Sally Russell, Mayor Pro Tem Justin Livingston Bruce Abernethy Bill Moseley Nathan Boddie Charter Review Citizen Presentation Committee Jack Farley Don Leonard Bill Galaway Kathleen Meehan Coop Brent Landels Richard Ross Bend Livability Project Steering Committee Seth Anderson Richard Ross Joey Drucker Sara Q. Thompson Kim Gammond Judy Watts DeeDee Johnson Westin Webre Susanne Julber Bend Livability Project Sponsors Amplion Kollective Ascent Architecture Lead Method Bank of the Cascades Leapology BBT Louis Capozzi Bend 2030 Magento Bend Broadband Manzama Bend Chamber Miller Lumber Bend Radio Group
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Name Common Name
    Approved Approved & as a eligible to Not eligible to Approved as Frontage fulfill other fulfill other Type of plant a Street Tree Tree standards standards Heritage Tree Tree Heritage Species Botanical Name Common name Native Abelia x grandiflora Glossy Abelia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes White Forsytha; Korean Abeliophyllum distichum Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Abelialeaf Acanthropanax Fiveleaf Aralia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes sieboldianus Acer ginnala Amur Maple Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Aesculus parviflora Bottlebrush Buckeye Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Aesculus pavia Red Buckeye Shrub, Deciduous No No Yes Yes Alnus incana ssp. rugosa Speckled Alder Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Alnus serrulata Hazel Alder Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Amelanchier humilis Low Serviceberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Amelanchier stolonifera Running Serviceberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes False Indigo Bush; Amorpha fruticosa Desert False Indigo; Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No No Not eligible Bastard Indigo Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Aronia melanocarpa Black Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Aronia prunifolia Purple Chokeberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Groundsel-Bush; Eastern Baccharis halimifolia Shrub, Deciduous No No Yes Yes Baccharis Summer Cypress; Bassia scoparia Shrub, Deciduous No No No Yes Burning-Bush Berberis canadensis American Barberry Shrub, Deciduous Yes No No Yes Common Barberry; Berberis vulgaris Shrub, Deciduous No No No No Not eligible European Barberry Betula pumila
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Quail Translocations in Eastern Oregon
    MOUNTAIN QUAIL TRANSLOCATIONS IN EASTERN OREGON Project Report: 2010 Trout Creek Mountains Kevyn Groot, Mountain Quail Technician Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Hines District Office 237 Highway 20 South, P.O. Box 8 Hines, OR 97738 (541) 573-6582 1 Table of Contents Page Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………...2 Methods………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………….......12 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………..….17 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………....…18 References…………………………………………………………………………………..…19 Appendix I: Mountain Quail Movements from Release Site to Breeding Range by Project Year…………………………………………………………………….….21 Appendix II: List of Tables and Maps………………………………………………….…....22 Maps……………………………………………………………………………………………23 2 Introduction The primary distribution of the mountain quail (Oreortyx pictus) includes the Sierra Nevada, the Cascades, and the Coast Range of the western United States (Gutiérrez and Delehanty 1999). Populations in the western Great Basin are currently the focus of conservation efforts due to a steady decline that began in the 20th century (Crawford 2000). In particular, eastern Oregon, western Nevada, and western Idaho have shown evidence of diminished populations that warrant significant concern. Fire suppression, water development, and overgrazing by livestock in brush and riparian zones have contributed to the degradation of mountain quail habitat in these regions and are cited as the main causes of population declines (Brennan 1994 in Gutiérrez and Delehanty 1999, Pope and Crawford 2000). The Mountain Quail Translocation Program for Eastern Oregon began in 2001 as a cooperative effort between the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), the U.S. Forest Service, and the Game Bird Research Program at Oregon State University. The goal of this initiative is to actively restore viable, self-sustaining mountain quail populations to affected native ranges in eastern Oregon.
    [Show full text]